Two pay penalty for allowing dogs to foul in Colne street (From Lancashire Telegraph)
When news happens, text LT and your photos and videos to 80360. Or contact us by email or phone.
Two pay penalty for allowing dogs to foul in Colne street
10:57am Friday 11th January 2013 in Pendle
TWO men from Pendle were ordered to pay £320 for allowing their dogs to foul.
Howard Lewin, aged 45, of Chad Street, Colne failed to appear at Reedley Magistrates’ Court.
But the case was proved in his absence and he was found guilty.
A dog warden witnessed a dog straying and fouling in Junction Street, Colne last August. The dog was traced back to Lewin who was issued with a fixed penalty notice, which he did not pay.
Magistrates found Lewin guilty of the dog-fouling incident and fined him £110, and ordered him to pay a £15 victim surcharge.
In a separate case, Clinton Eyers 33, of Poplar Street, Nelson, also failed to appear before Reedley magistrates.
He was also found guilty and fined £110, and ordered to pay £70 costs and a £15 victim surcharge.
Eyers was witnessed allowing his dog to foul on in June last year on Walton Street, Colne.
Coun John David, from Pendle Council, said: “Picking up a dog’s waste is part and parcel of being a dog owner.
“If you’re not prepared to do that, then you really shouldn’t have a dog.
He added: “We do follow up on reports and have an excellent track record of fining and prosecuting irresponsible dog owners.”
Comments(5)
George.White.Bread
says...
11:21am Fri 11 Jan 13
tipsy1
says...
1:22pm Fri 11 Jan 13
midas
says...
1:41pm Fri 11 Jan 13
Izanears wrote:The fines don't go to the council they go to the Court. The Council will get their costs, £70, probably deducted from benefits at £5 per week. Although if Mr Eyers was to appear in Court on other matters the £70 would probably get remitted by the Magistrates and the Council end up with nothing.
Handing out fines is one thing. Collecting them is another. Perhaps Councillor David will tell us when the money is in the councils bank account!
.
£110 fine after a trial (which they couldn't be bothered to attend) when the fixed penalty is £75 isn't offering any incentive to pay the fixed penalty is it?
Izanears
says...
3:57pm Fri 11 Jan 13
midas wrote:Thank you Midas.
Izanears wrote:The fines don't go to the council they go to the Court. The Council will get their costs, £70, probably deducted from benefits at £5 per week. Although if Mr Eyers was to appear in Court on other matters the £70 would probably get remitted by the Magistrates and the Council end up with nothing.
Handing out fines is one thing. Collecting them is another. Perhaps Councillor David will tell us when the money is in the councils bank account!
.
£110 fine after a trial (which they couldn't be bothered to attend) when the fixed penalty is £75 isn't offering any incentive to pay the fixed penalty is it?
Let me just repeat that it would be good to be informed when the council gets its share of the prodeeds. However much it is.
Izanears says...
11:02am Fri 11 Jan 13
Collecting them is another.
Perhaps Councillor David will tell us when the money is in the councils bank account!