THE Chancellor has expressed an interest in how the public think we should cut our deficit.
May I suggest that a good start for our nation's financial savings — and a great example to the population — would be to reduce the size of the House of Commons.
We have 650 MPs for a population of 70 million. The USA has 457 Congressmen for a population of around 240 million. This is a representation roughly one fifth of ours.
You can just imagine the length of debates, and their intellectual level, with that membership. China would have a legislature of over 12,000 on the same basis.
America is a very successful country so perhaps we could learn from their minimalist approach to government.
We have a whip system therefore MPs cannot vote independently on many issues, so total numbers are irrelevant.
MPs are very expensive, even without the exaggerated expenses, I propose that we cut our House of Commons to a membership of, say 140. This would give us an immediate saving of many millions of pounds and give a powerful example to our nation.
It is unlikely to damage our governance.
Dr Tom Paterson Summerseat Lane Ramsbottom
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here