Clayton-le-Moors mum worried about PIP breast implants (From Lancashire Telegraph)
When news happens, text LT and your photos and videos to 80360. Or contact us by email or phone.
Clayton-le-Moors mum worried about PIP breast implants
1:00pm Saturday 21st January 2012 in Clayton-le-Moors
By Neil Docking, Reporter
WORRIED Rebecca Ashton had PIP implants
A MUM-OF-FOUR whose breast implants contain banned silicone has demanded action from private medical companies.
Rebecca Ashton, 33, is one of thousands of women whose implants consist of industrial silicone usually used in mattresses.
Miss Ashton, from Clayton-le-Moors fears her implants may have leaked, putting her at risk of serious health problems.
Now she and sister-in-law Vikki Ashton, who also has PIP breast implants, have set up a Facebook page for women affected by the issue.
They are calling on private medical companies to replace the implants or take them out free of charge.
Miss Ashton, from Clayton-le-Moors, paid £4,150 to be fitted with PIP (Poly Implant Prostheses) implants four years ago.
But it has since emerged that the defunct French company PIP filled its implants with industrial silicone, originally manufactured for use in the mattress industry, rather than medical grade silicone.
Miss Ashton said: “I had my breasts done in September 2007, through the Harley Medical Group in Manchester. I went from an A to a D.
“I was 29-years-old, I’d had all my children and I did it for cosmetic reasons. I wanted some boobs because I’d never had any.
“Everything as far as the Harley Medical Group was concerned was fine and the aftercare was brilliant - until the PIP scandal.”
Miss Ashton said she was extremely concerned because she had discovered a lump on her bikini line and previously developed a lump under her arm.
She said: “I don’t know if that’s anything to do with my breasts.
“The doctors say that when they leak the liquid goes wherever it wants.”
Around 300,000 of the PIP implants were sold worldwide, with 40,000 fitted in the UK.
European health authorities have recommended that women fitted with the banned implants should have them removed as a precaution.
The NHS concluded that there was not enough evidence to recommend their routine removal, but it is taking the implants out if there is medical need, risk or unresolved concerns.
Miss Ashton’s GP has referred her for an appointment at an NHS breast clinic at Burnley General Hospital on January 30.
She said: “I’ve been offered a full examination where they take biopsies of your breast tissue and do four different tests.
“For the last week I haven’t slept properly. I only wish I had done something a year ago when I first spotted a lump.
“I feel like I know they are ruptured and I’m just praying there is no health impact.”
Miss Ashton, her sister-in-law and their friend Fiona Platt, hope their Facebook page, called the PIP Implant Forum, will bring together women affected by the issue.
She said: “Harley Medical Group are now saying if they have ruptured they will replace them for free if they were within the last six years.
“The NHS have been fabulous, they’ve done what they can, it’s the private companies we have a problem with.
“We’re not saying it’s their fault, we’re just saying you sold us them and if you bought a car and it was faulty you would get your money back or a replacement car.”
The Harley Medical Group said it was first trying to identify which of its patients had PIP implants, before contacting them and checking their medical records.
In a letter sent to patients on Friday, January 13, Harley urged anybody experiencing symptoms such as pain, heat around the breast area, redness, inflammation or rippling to call its team directly.
The letter said: “We fully understand just how anxious, angry and concerned you are. We are sorry and apologise sincerely. Our top priority is you.
“We understand from speaking to many of you that you would like to have your implants replaced as soon as possible.
“Unfortunately The Harley Medical Group does not have enough hospitals, surgeons and staff to manage this alone. Nor does it have scanning facilities. We will require help. We have spoken to the NHS again and plan to meet them again next week.
“Almost 14,000 of you are involved in this situation. We currently treat around 4,000 patients a year so I hope you will understand the scale of the problem we are seeking to resolve.
“We recognise our responsibility and are determined to help everyone who has been in our care.
“We would like to thank you for your understanding and patience in this very difficult time.”
Comments(31)
louderfasterlonger
says...
2:37pm Sat 21 Jan 12
Where I do agree is that the implants should be replaced at the expense of the patient or the person originally carrying out the procedure.
bbgal
says...
3:46pm Sat 21 Jan 12
if you spent 5 grand on a car that was fitted with a counterfeit engine would you like to pay for a replacement engine and the fitting of it, no you would not ! you would take it back and expect a full refund not pay another 5 grand for a replacement.
retired one
says...
4:38pm Sat 21 Jan 12
ossy wrote:I agree with you that only mastectomy patients need implants. No-one forced these women to have them, they had them for vanity and not urgent medical reasons.
Miss Ashton, I have every sympathy with your plight, but why can't you pay for the implants to be removed yourself, you could afford nearly 5 grand to have them in the first place.
Personally I believe that only mastectomy patients NEED implants.
bbgal
says...
5:14pm Sat 21 Jan 12
Do you also feel the same about those women who have suffered horrific burns following allergic reactions to hair dye, should the NHS have turned them away ? after all do they really NEED to dye their hair. We live in a very visual age and rightly or wrongly people are judged on their appearance and first impression so it is not surprising women are subjecting themselves to enhancing treatments. for goodness sake turn the blame onto the manufacturer and clinics not the women.
frank
says...
5:16pm Sat 21 Jan 12
the companies that carry out this work, making massive profits in the process, should cover these costs not the general public.
ossy
says...
6:51pm Sat 21 Jan 12
bbgal wrote:I fully agree, I would expect a replacement from the person that sold me the faulty goods, but the private clinics are saying they cannot afford nor have the facilities to replace them all. Let the NHS do it and charge them.
Ossy you need to think about what you are saying, do you really believe that if a person who has saved up long and hard to buy themselves some breasts should be treated any different than any other consumer. They have been supplied with counterfeit goods which are potentially toxic and life threatening. The monster who manufactured them has committed fraud on a large scale without a care of the consequences. whether the woman has had her breast enhanced due to vanity or low self esteem does not matter, none of them deserve to have had substandard and dangerous implants, this is not what they paid for !! They should not have to pay for them to be replaced themselves the responsible clinics should be footing the bill and the government should be stepping in to make sure they do.
if you spent 5 grand on a car that was fitted with a counterfeit engine would you like to pay for a replacement engine and the fitting of it, no you would not ! you would take it back and expect a full refund not pay another 5 grand for a replacement.
ossy
says...
6:51pm Sat 21 Jan 12
bbgal wrote:I fully agree, I would expect a replacement from the person that sold me the faulty goods, but the private clinics are saying they cannot afford nor have the facilities to replace them all. Let the NHS do it and charge them.
Ossy you need to think about what you are saying, do you really believe that if a person who has saved up long and hard to buy themselves some breasts should be treated any different than any other consumer. They have been supplied with counterfeit goods which are potentially toxic and life threatening. The monster who manufactured them has committed fraud on a large scale without a care of the consequences. whether the woman has had her breast enhanced due to vanity or low self esteem does not matter, none of them deserve to have had substandard and dangerous implants, this is not what they paid for !! They should not have to pay for them to be replaced themselves the responsible clinics should be footing the bill and the government should be stepping in to make sure they do.
if you spent 5 grand on a car that was fitted with a counterfeit engine would you like to pay for a replacement engine and the fitting of it, no you would not ! you would take it back and expect a full refund not pay another 5 grand for a replacement.
ossy
says...
6:53pm Sat 21 Jan 12
frank wrote:fully agree frank
isn't it time that insurance has to be taken out when people go in for this sort of thing, to cover eventualities like this?
the companies that carry out this work, making massive profits in the process, should cover these costs not the general public.
Say it Right
says...
8:13pm Sat 21 Jan 12
All the cosmetic clinic should do the same. Did they not wonder why these implants cost just a fifth of what they'd normally pay?
As for my other friend, well she's been told they're fine and they believe there's no added risk with these implants. If she wants them removed it will cost £1500 and if she wants different implants inserting that will be another £3750+. What a joke!!
Let's not forget men also have pip implants, pec and testicular. This does not just affect women.
living the end times in BB1
says...
8:58pm Sat 21 Jan 12
Say it Right wrote:This as affected 40,000 women in the UK if you times that by six grand each its only a mere quarter of a million and thats including ten grand for Sat It Rights dodgey PIP balls.
I know of two women with these implants. One is lucky that she went with a company with morals, hers are being removed and replaced for free. I think the company is MYA cosmetic surgery.
All the cosmetic clinic should do the same. Did they not wonder why these implants cost just a fifth of what they'd normally pay?
As for my other friend, well she's been told they're fine and they believe there's no added risk with these implants. If she wants them removed it will cost £1500 and if she wants different implants inserting that will be another £3750+. What a joke!!
Let's not forget men also have pip implants, pec and testicular. This does not just affect women.
Not even a years salary for a decent Harley St surgeon.But the NHS concluded that there was not enough evidence to recommend their routine removal.
A spokesman for East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust said: “We recognise that this will be a worrying time for women with PIP implants and that they need to be properly supported by those that performed the implant surgery.
For those who had surgery for nothing more than vanity i am in favour of them making their own arrangements to have them removed.
Jack-son
says...
9:00pm Sat 21 Jan 12
Surely these difficulties should be covered by it.
I do think the NHS should remove implants fitted privately where a risk to health has been identified but should not have to bear the cost of new replacements.
Fire Fly
says...
9:57pm Sat 21 Jan 12
At the end of the day, if you'd paid 5k for a car that didn't drive properly, you'd expect a refund, or if you found out that the car was fitted with illegal parts etc...you would expect them changed. Basically, if you pay for something....it needs to be fit for purpose & that goes for these implants too
milly mandy
says...
10:01pm Sat 21 Jan 12
Lifeinthemix
says...
11:52pm Sat 21 Jan 12
Darwen Tower
says...
9:27am Sun 22 Jan 12
louderfasterlonger
says...
12:24pm Sun 22 Jan 12
living the end times in BB1 wrote:Think you need a maths lesson, 40,000 times 6,000 is quarter of a billion, not quarter of a million !
Say it Right wrote:This as affected 40,000 women in the UK if you times that by six grand each its only a mere quarter of a million and thats including ten grand for Sat It Rights dodgey PIP balls.
I know of two women with these implants. One is lucky that she went with a company with morals, hers are being removed and replaced for free. I think the company is MYA cosmetic surgery.
All the cosmetic clinic should do the same. Did they not wonder why these implants cost just a fifth of what they'd normally pay?
As for my other friend, well she's been told they're fine and they believe there's no added risk with these implants. If she wants them removed it will cost £1500 and if she wants different implants inserting that will be another £3750+. What a joke!!
Let's not forget men also have pip implants, pec and testicular. This does not just affect women.
Not even a years salary for a decent Harley St surgeon.But the NHS concluded that there was not enough evidence to recommend their routine removal.
A spokesman for East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust said: “We recognise that this will be a worrying time for women with PIP implants and that they need to be properly supported by those that performed the implant surgery.
For those who had surgery for nothing more than vanity i am in favour of them making their own arrangements to have them removed.
maxcollie
says...
1:26pm Sun 22 Jan 12
retired one
says...
2:38pm Sun 22 Jan 12
bbgal
says...
3:33pm Sun 22 Jan 12
maxcollie wrote:maxcollie and retired one, you have no idea what some women must feel like when their self esteem is so low because they hate the way they look. stop being so judgemental. Having breast implants can transform a womans life. and stop playing the vanity card it makes no difference and does not alter the facts that they have got what they paid for and should not have to pay again. The government has not supported these women their statement regarding the safety of these implants was a cop out. If the NHS are going to remove them from all the women who have had then done on the NHS then they must believe there is a risk to health. The government needs to enforce that the clinics take responsibility.
I f the implants were done privately for their vanity. Why on earth should we the tax payers pay to have them removed . What is wrong with a natural body?
jimmypetter1
says...
5:49pm Sun 22 Jan 12
living the end times in BB1
says...
6:37pm Sun 22 Jan 12
bbgal wrote:Quarter of a million pounds it will cost to remove all the pip inplants.
maxcollie wrote: I f the implants were done privately for their vanity. Why on earth should we the tax payers pay to have them removed . What is wrong with a natural body?maxcollie and retired one, you have no idea what some women must feel like when their self esteem is so low because they hate the way they look. stop being so judgemental. Having breast implants can transform a womans life. and stop playing the vanity card it makes no difference and does not alter the facts that they have got what they paid for and should not have to pay again. The government has not supported these women their statement regarding the safety of these implants was a cop out. If the NHS are going to remove them from all the women who have had then done on the NHS then they must believe there is a risk to health. The government needs to enforce that the clinics take responsibility.
Lifeinthemix
says...
8:25pm Sun 22 Jan 12
vanity it is, but the only way vanity will be balanced is for it to go extreme and effect many so they wise up and realise its not all about looks its about people.
Everyone suffers the barrage of sex, vanity, fashion and grading the human accordingly, the test is therefore, do you fall for it?
without a strong self identity you follow the most in your face stimuli, when you have a respect for who you are then there are lines you don't cross, regardless of the pressure. We exist the best we can always trying to improve because that is a good example to set, deregulation of the TV and the introduction of XXX mainsteam destroyed the morality lines, this is the result.
Girls the doctors are not interested in your wellbeing, they want cash, status, or they would advise you at all times never to change what you where born with without the effort required.
the boys are going to suffer i the coming years for the same reason, they want big muscles without the effort and take steroids, best advice to you chaps is to have your children before you reach 30 or forget it....
AccyLass
says...
8:26pm Sun 22 Jan 12
living the end times in BB1 wrote:£6000 x 40,000 ppl = £240,000,000 - that is 240 million pounds not a quarter of a million!
bbgal wrote:Quarter of a million pounds it will cost to remove all the pip inplants.
maxcollie wrote: I f the implants were done privately for their vanity. Why on earth should we the tax payers pay to have them removed . What is wrong with a natural body?maxcollie and retired one, you have no idea what some women must feel like when their self esteem is so low because they hate the way they look. stop being so judgemental. Having breast implants can transform a womans life. and stop playing the vanity card it makes no difference and does not alter the facts that they have got what they paid for and should not have to pay again. The government has not supported these women their statement regarding the safety of these implants was a cop out. If the NHS are going to remove them from all the women who have had then done on the NHS then they must believe there is a risk to health. The government needs to enforce that the clinics take responsibility.
peely
says...
10:44pm Sun 22 Jan 12
If they paid for them putting in then they should pay for them taking out !!
End of story..
living the end times in BB1
says...
8:01am Mon 23 Jan 12
peely wrote:Spot on.
It,s not their breasts that need attention its their brains - any woman daft enoughto undergo surgery just to have bigger t$ts need their heads examaning or phsyciatric help !!
If they paid for them putting in then they should pay for them taking out !!
End of story..
I was a victim of a scam to pay for a pair of inplants and it turns out that they are a pair of industrial pip t1ts.As she was having her t1ts done i was having a tatoo done on my back shoulder and chest and just to finish with i had the yin yang sign tatooed on the back of my hand.
I am not expecting her t1ts to blow up but this goes a long way to proving my beliefs in yin yang.
louderfasterlonger
says...
10:43am Mon 23 Jan 12
Coeur de Lion
says...
6:06pm Mon 23 Jan 12
jimmypetter1 wrote:Talking of useless t*ts.
they should all be removed by the nhs as soon as possible, who can begrudge that as its a health risk,
OwdAkela
says...
6:34pm Mon 23 Jan 12
bbgal wrote:I think you will find that bbgal, maxcollie and myself are not being judgemental. The females that have chosen to mess with nature are the ones who are judgemental - they think that we all judge by their standards which are low and shallow - no self esteem? Do something good for someone else and stop being selfish. That is what builds self esteem not being an Essex lookalike.
maxcollie wrote: I f the implants were done privately for their vanity. Why on earth should we the tax payers pay to have them removed . What is wrong with a natural body?maxcollie and retired one, you have no idea what some women must feel like when their self esteem is so low because they hate the way they look. stop being so judgemental. Having breast implants can transform a womans life. and stop playing the vanity card it makes no difference and does not alter the facts that they have got what they paid for and should not have to pay again. The government has not supported these women their statement regarding the safety of these implants was a cop out. If the NHS are going to remove them from all the women who have had then done on the NHS then they must believe there is a risk to health. The government needs to enforce that the clinics take responsibility.
chris283
says...
10:17am Tue 24 Jan 12
ossybsting
says...
1:38pm Sun 29 Jan 12
.........real ones. any size, shape, must be real.
ossy says...
2:06pm Sat 21 Jan 12
Personally I believe that only mastectomy patients NEED implants.