Barnoldswick homes plan goes back to the drawing board

Barnoldswick homes plan goes back to the drawing board

Barnoldswick homes plan goes back to the drawing board

First published in News Lancashire Telegraph: Photograph of the Author by , Reporter

DEVELOPERS behind a controversial housing development in Barnoldswick have had to go back to the drawing board after it was discovered they didn’t own all of the required land for the project.

An application for 29 houses on land off Long Ing Lane, near the Leeds and Liverpool Canal, was due to be discussed by Pendle Council’s development control committee. But the application has had to be resubmitted, which means another 21-day consultation exercise will now have to take place.

Coun David Whipp questioned whether the boundaries shown on the application were accurate when the plans were considered at the last West Craven area committee meeting. He said the application was back at square one.

Councillors on the area committee had voted to reject the plans, going against a planning officer's advice, which is why it was due to be heard again by the development control committee.

Resident Peter Crompton addressed the committee on behalf of more than 500 objectors, highlighting residents' concerns about access, increased traffic and road safety, and pointed out that neighbouring property owners would be robbed of their environmental amenity.

Councillors were also upset the developers refused to contribute to local bus stop improvements and open spaces.

Coun Ken Hartley said: “This is a total nonsense application.” he added that 20 per cent of it was outside the settlement boundary.

But Neil Watson, Pendle Council's planning and building control manager, said: "Developers can challenge decisions based on viability. These type of green field sites form the type of development Pendle needs, and we should allow a developer a reasonable profit margin.

"If these additional contributions would be made, it would then become unviable."

Comments (1)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

10:28pm Sat 21 Jun 14

Pendlesider says...

QUOTE "But Neil Watson, Pendle Council's planning and building control manager, said: "Developers can challenge decisions based on viability. These type of green field sites form the type of development Pendle needs, and we should allow a developer a reasonable profit margin. "
.
clearly the application was'nt 'valid' due to the plans encroaching over 20% of the proposed development. Something you'd think a planning manager would actually pick up on during the application validation process?
.
'profit margins' , as any planning manager knows, are not a material consideration in planning terms.
.
Finally, it is not the role of a planning officer to dictate what is and what is not needed in terms of development. That is for the development control committee to decide.
.
My advice would be the re-submission be dealt with by a planning officer who knows their onions.
QUOTE "But Neil Watson, Pendle Council's planning and building control manager, said: "Developers can challenge decisions based on viability. These type of green field sites form the type of development Pendle needs, and we should allow a developer a reasonable profit margin. " . clearly the application was'nt 'valid' due to the plans encroaching over 20% of the proposed development. Something you'd think a planning manager would actually pick up on during the application validation process? . 'profit margins' , as any planning manager knows, are not a material consideration in planning terms. . Finally, it is not the role of a planning officer to dictate what is and what is not needed in terms of development. That is for the development control committee to decide. . My advice would be the re-submission be dealt with by a planning officer who knows their onions. Pendlesider
  • Score: 1

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree