Lancashire TelegraphTwo pay huge price for rubbish build-up in Darwen (From Lancashire Telegraph)

When news happens, text LT and your photos and videos to 80360. Or contact us by email or phone.

Two pay huge price for rubbish build-up in Darwen

TWO Darwen residents have been fined for allowing rubbish to accumulate at their properties.

Darren Tomlinson, 40, of Clarence Street, was told to pay £264 for failing to remove waste, including dog excrement from the yard of the property, after repeated warnings from the council.

He did not to attend the hearing before Blackburn magistrates yesterday but in a statement read to the court he said he had been involved in a dispute with neighbours at the time over who owned the bins, and that the waste bins had gone missing.

The same court in a separate hearing was told that Jamie-Leigh Scott, 23, of Lily Street, had been fined following a visit from a public protection officer.

She had been served with a notice by Blackburn with Darwen Council in December 2013 but was visited again in January this year when it was established the notice had been breached.

She was ordered to pay £264, which included a fine of £165, compensation of £80, and a victim surcharge of £20.

Coun Jim Smith, executive member for Environment said: “It is crucial that residents dispose of their rubbish in the correct, hygienic way to avoid prosecution and fines.

“The Your Call campaign continues to show that the vast majority of residents want to see our borough clean, and we will name and shame in the press those who litter our community and tarnish this good work.”

“People should consider their neighbourhoods and their neighbours, and dispose of their rubbish properly.

“This is a considerable amount of money for not putting household waste in the bins provided and putting them out on collection day.”

Comments (3)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

11:44pm Fri 30 May 14

fireonthemountain says...

She was ordered to pay £264, which included a fine of £165, compensation of £80, and a victim surcharge of £20.

So - 165 + 80 + 20 = 264 .

Errrrmm ......
She was ordered to pay £264, which included a fine of £165, compensation of £80, and a victim surcharge of £20. So - 165 + 80 + 20 = 264 . Errrrmm ...... fireonthemountain
  • Score: 4

9:41am Sat 31 May 14

jenkinsroy says...

I see they have the same accountant as this government
What is the old saying in for a penny in for a pound
we should be asking who get the pound .?????
I see they have the same accountant as this government What is the old saying in for a penny in for a pound we should be asking who get the pound .????? jenkinsroy
  • Score: 2

3:36pm Mon 2 Jun 14

We'll win the next one says...

Scruffs
Scruffs We'll win the next one
  • Score: 2

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree