- Mobile site
- E-Newsletters
-
- News feed
- Find us on Twitter
@lancstelegraph
News, sport and entertainment from all over East Lancashire
@blackburnrovers
All the latest news from Blackburn Rovers
@burnleyfc
All the latest news from the Clarets
@lt_blackburn
Latest news from Blackburn
@lt_burnley
Latest news from Burnley
@lt_darwen
Latest news from Darwen
@lt_hyndburn
Latest news from Hyndburn
@lt_pendle
Latest news from Pendle
@lt_ribblevalley
Latest news from Ribble Valley
@lt_rossendale
Latest news from Rossendale
- Find us on Facebook
The Lancashire Telegraph
News, sport and entertainment from all over East Lancashire
Rivals fire potshots in East Lancashire pothole debate (From Lancashire Telegraph)
When news happens, text LT and your photos and videos to 80360. Or contact us by email or phone.
Rivals fire potshots in East Lancashire pothole debate
4:00pm Friday 8th February 2013 in News
By Bill Jacobs, Local government reporter
Three of Blackburn's many potholes
SENIOR councillors have clashed over road resurfacing cash as East Lancashire motorists face daily misery because of a “pothole epidemic” on local highways.
Blackburn with Darwen Tory spokesman Alan Cottam said borough Labour leaders diverted £750,000 earmarked for repairs for other purposes.
But council highways boss Dave Harling said his opposite number is simply “wrong”.
The row surfaced when councillors debated government spending cuts of £30 million over two years imposed on the council.
Coun Harling did welcome extra government grants of £334,000 in 2013 and £171,000 in 2014/15 for “additional highway maintenance works”.
But Coun Cottam said this was a sticking plaster to cover the fact that in 2012/2013 £750,000 earmarked for roadworks had been spent on other council services. The dispute comes after complaints that thousands of extra potholes had left Lancashire county and Blackburn with Darwen councils with facing millions of pounds in repair costs.
Coun Harling blamed “shrinking council budgets and a deteriorating network” for the shock rise.
Coun Cottam said: “Last year the council had £750,000 earmarked for road repairs and resurfacing which it diverted to other purposes blaming government cuts.
“To trumpet extra government cash as a solution to the pothole problem is a sticking plaster.
“If they had spent this £750,000 as they should have done in the first place, the problem would be nowhere near as bad.” Coun Harling said: “As part of the previous year's 25 per cent council cuts, the highway maintenance budget was reduced by around £750,000 at the start of 2011/12.
“I stress it was not spent elsewhere in the council.
“The council then re-invested £1m in response to the state of the roads and the harsh winter, boosted by Department of Transport funding as the Government recognised the problem nationally.
“If Coun Cottam is suggesting that we had £750,000 to spend on the roads and we failed to do so, then he is wrong.
“It is the result of his government's cuts that we had to reduce highway maintenance funding in the first place.”
Coun Cottam said: “The borough ruling Labour group have used the supplementary grant and not the base highways budget on the roads.
“Whatever Dave Harling says, they used it for something else.”
Comments are closed on this article.
Comments (9)
4:14pm Fri 8 Feb 13
mavrick says...
5:42pm Fri 8 Feb 13
Private I says...
Now that their own Government is unfairly hitting areas like our & diverting money to leafy parts of the country he tries to blame the local Labour Council who appear to be trying their best to protect local people & local services despite having had huge amounts of money taken away.
Cottam, Lee & their Lib Dem mates Foster & Browne should hang their heads in shame and get onto their buddy Jake Berry and tell him for once to stand up for the people he's supposed to represent.
6:18pm Fri 8 Feb 13
shytalk says...
6:44pm Fri 8 Feb 13
ste.g says...
7:31pm Fri 8 Feb 13
2 for 5p says...
I pay road fund for the purpose of repairing roads.
to not do that is a breach of contract
12:56am Sat 9 Feb 13
s_smith says...
The council has a duty to maintain the roads in a safe condition - that does NOT mean pothole free. They could - in theory - rake up the tarmac and return it to gravel and the road would still be regarded as safe as long as there were no deep ruts and one could travel along it.
The duty is a statutory duty which they are legally required to carry out. It does not form a contract with the end user.
9:13am Sat 9 Feb 13
Char_donnay says...
I've seen them on our road acting like children and and moving on in what was a ridiculously short space of time, six to nine months later they come back and fill the pothole again.
Please do not waste our money and do a proper job, right first time.
6:06pm Sun 10 Feb 13
allan1957 says...
10:04pm Sun 10 Feb 13
Graham Hartley says...
Four thousand holes in Blackburn, Lancashire
from the words to a 1967 song by Lennon-McCartney