Blackburn man angry over 'ocean' of plastic waste stacked next to home (From Lancashire Telegraph)
When news happens, text LT and your photos and videos to 80360. Or contact us by email or phone.
Blackburn man angry over 'ocean' of plastic waste stacked next to home
11:30am Monday 26th November 2012 in News
By Simone Yates
Howard Hudson (inset) is furious over the view from his garden
THIS is the sight that greets Howard Hudson every time he walks into his backyard.
As he peers over his wall he is confronted by an ‘ocean’ of plastic recycling waste.
Mr Hudson said: “It is an absolute disgrace, it looks really awful. I can’t carry on living like this.”
V10 Polymers which owns the site in Queens Park, Blackburn, is not doing anything illegal.
Because the firm has been operating legally at the site for many years it is not controvening any planning rules.
It said its recycling operations met Environment Agency and borough requirements.
But Mr Hudson and his neighbours in adjacent Derham Street say they have to contend with constant noise from heavy lorries going to and from the neighbouring recycling site and rats scurrying across the mountains of rubbish from the canal towards their homes.
They are calling for action from their local councillors and the Environment Agency to prevent the operations of V10 Polymers making their lives a misery.
Mr Hudson, 57, said the expansion of the firm’s Rockliffe Works in Paterson Street had seen the mountain of plastic waste grow and brought an infestation of rats to his and nearby homes.
Neighbour Diane Hargreaves, who has been in Derham Street for just three weeks, said: “I knew V10 was there when I moved in, but cannot believe how bad it is.”
Queens Park councillors Salim Mulla and Faryad Hussain, Blackburn with Darwen Council’s executive member for Environment, have promised to investigate the residents’ concerns.
The Environment Agency, which licenses the plastics recycling firm set up in 1968, has also launched its own enquiries.
Mr Hudson, who has lived in Derham Street for around 20 years, said the increasing activity at the site was making his family’s life a misery.
He said he feared it had caused the value of his Blackburn home to drop by £20,000.
He claimed he can no longer stand living next to the eyesore, but cannot sell his home since the firm ‘made amendments’ a few years ago.
Mr Hudson said: “This is the mess that I see over my back yard wall and every morning through the bedroom window.
“Since the company has grown, residents around here have been left with noisy wagons and this eyesore. We are going to start a petition and send it to the council. I was hoping to emigrate next year but I will never be able to sell the house.
“My son is in the building trade and he said the house has devalued by £20,000. The council needs to do something.
“When I moved in it was not like this. I just don’t know what to do because it’s really getting me down.
“There are rats everywhere I have had to buy three cats to keep them away.”
Mr Hudson said when he first moved in to the property, the company, which has been there for twenty years, was ‘quiet and tidy’.
Mrs Hargreaves said: “The view is dreadful and the noise from lorries, especially in the morning is terrible. I want the company or the council to do something about it. Even a wall or screen between us and the recycling site would be an improvement.”
V10 Polymers manager David Holt said that the company have the been trading the same way as usual.
He said: “ We have controlled facilities for our waste and the items that we recycle disposed of accordingly. And as for the rats we are situated right next to the canal.”
According to the company’s website the firm handles in excess of 5,000 tonnes of plastic scrap per year.
Coun Hussain said: “I will look into this both as a local councillor and council executive board member for the environment.
“As local councillor I am there to represent the interests of the householders and as member for the environment to make sure the company is adhering to all the rules and regulations it should.
“I shall be investigating this and talking to residents, the company and council officials to see what can be done.”
Coun Mulla said:”I shall be talking with Faryad and we as councillors for Queen Park will investigate this and see what can be done to solve any problems.”
A spokesman for the Environment Agency said: “We have taken a complaint from a local resident relating to this site and are currently carrying out investigations.”
Blackburn with Darwen planning chairman Jim Smith said: “As the firm has been there for some time, we can do nothing in planning terms.
“It is about ensuring it meets environmental standards and the council mediating between the company and local residents on issues like this.
“A long standing industrial operation in the middle of a residential area is not uncommon in Blackburn.”
Comments(21)
Pebbles3
says...
2:01pm Mon 26 Nov 12
ste6976
says...
2:22pm Mon 26 Nov 12
Bootneck
says...
4:44pm Mon 26 Nov 12
And what of the employees of this factory? Should they risk their employment because one or two residents have decided to complain?
jogalot
says...
5:50pm Mon 26 Nov 12
A Darener
says...
7:17pm Mon 26 Nov 12
makemelaugh
says...
7:47pm Mon 26 Nov 12
makemelaugh
says...
8:01pm Mon 26 Nov 12
Pebbles3 wrote:Rats don't eat plastic as far as i am aware, perhaps you should take a walk down the canal towards Eanam Wharf, the place is riddled with rats and i don't know of any recycling factories in that area!
Poor people, bet the bosses of this company wouldn't want this as their view from their own house. Look on satelite images on google, this didn't look this 2 years ago. I'm glad I don't have to live there, must be awful. These places should not be in residential areas they should be on the outskirts of town, surely planning permission would be required for this? Manager says the rats are from the canal mmmmm yeah, but where are they heading towards from the canal, the left over smells of the rubbish on the containers probably.
ajameson86
says...
8:14pm Mon 26 Nov 12
George White Bread
says...
11:38pm Mon 26 Nov 12
Legal Beagle
says...
2:03am Tue 27 Nov 12
ajameson86 wrote:This is an absurd attitude, and I suspect the comment has been written by either Mr Holt himself or one of his employees.
How can you complain when that business has been there for such a long time! Putting peoples jobs at risk by trying to cause issues to Mr Holt (an honest business man) I think is very selfish. Recycling is something this country should take more seriously, and with people like you Mr Hudson, we are only going to go backwards!
The mere fact that the business has been there a long time doesn't allow them to escalate the scale of their operations so as to cause a nuisance to Mr Hudson and his neighbours.
`Honest businessman' Mr Holt has an obligation to his neighbours to run his business in such a way that it does not impinge on their reasonable enjoyment of their property. If he is unwilling or unable to do so legal remedies such as an injunction may be exercised against the company.
makaveli96
says...
7:25am Tue 27 Nov 12
They say Recycling produces a better climate.
Try telling this to Mr Hudson.
Plasticbertrand
says...
9:32am Tue 27 Nov 12
Ex_Darwen_Tech
says...
3:43pm Tue 27 Nov 12
Guzford
says...
5:21pm Tue 27 Nov 12
Guzford
says...
5:24pm Tue 27 Nov 12
Ex_Darwen_Tech wrote:you have no idea how Mr Holts company works so why are you commenting with your silly text book lean manufacturing rubbish ?
It seems to me that V10 Polymers manager David Holt needs to take a course on modern manufacturing methods such as "Just-in-time" and only have enough waste to be processed for the immediate recycling process. Why take on so much waste plastics if it can't be processed in a timely fashion. Do they buy the waste plastic or are they paid by the amount they take? I suspect the latter.
Bootneck
says...
5:30pm Tue 27 Nov 12
Ex_Darwen_Tech wrote:Ex Darwen Tech, you are talking out your backside about a business you obviously have no knowledge about , and business principles you are ignorant of. Waste streams that need recycling cannot be turned off and on to suit the owners needs and requirements. once a contract is started you have a ready and continuous supply that needs to be dealt with, but the moment you stop that feedstock, then the supply goes elsewhere for processing ! The business handles over 5000 tons of waste per annum, what do you expect will happen to that if is not handled by a professional outfit like V10 ?
It seems to me that V10 Polymers manager David Holt needs to take a course on modern manufacturing methods such as "Just-in-time" and only have enough waste to be processed for the immediate recycling process. Why take on so much waste plastics if it can't be processed in a timely fashion. Do they buy the waste plastic or are they paid by the amount they take? I suspect the latter.
makemelaugh
says...
6:06pm Tue 27 Nov 12
Legal Beagle wrote:Have you even read the article?
ajameson86 wrote:This is an absurd attitude, and I suspect the comment has been written by either Mr Holt himself or one of his employees.
How can you complain when that business has been there for such a long time! Putting peoples jobs at risk by trying to cause issues to Mr Holt (an honest business man) I think is very selfish. Recycling is something this country should take more seriously, and with people like you Mr Hudson, we are only going to go backwards!
The mere fact that the business has been there a long time doesn't allow them to escalate the scale of their operations so as to cause a nuisance to Mr Hudson and his neighbours.
`Honest businessman' Mr Holt has an obligation to his neighbours to run his business in such a way that it does not impinge on their reasonable enjoyment of their property. If he is unwilling or unable to do so legal remedies such as an injunction may be exercised against the company.
"the site has been operating legally for many number of years and is not contravening any planning rules"
Ex_Darwen_Tech
says...
8:45pm Tue 27 Nov 12
So they have a contract to buy ALL the waste that their suppliers want to deliver to the recucling plant.
WOW what a deal for the suppliers. So the more folks recycle the more waste plastic will arrive at the plant? Sorry but that doesn't make sense.
No matter the material a plant is processing one has to control the inventory. And if the company is buying recyclable plastics and selling the processed resulting product it is even more important to control the inventory. If they can't keep up the flow now the stock pile will just continue to grow.
Legal Beagle
says...
9:00pm Tue 27 Nov 12
"the site has been operating legally for many number of years and is not contravening any planning rules"
If you possessed any knowledge of legal matters, which you clearly don't, you would realise that there are two types of law, public and private.
Planning is a matter of public law, i.e. the state versus the individual, and is enforced by the state for the good of the community as a whole.
The law of nuisance is a matter of private law, and protects the rights of one individual against another - an action for breach of contract, for example.
The mere fact that the state is unable to take action using planning law does NOT in any way restrict the right of Mr Hudson to take action in the civil courts to protect his rights.
midas
says...
4:12pm Wed 28 Nov 12
makemelaugh wrote:You seem to have mistaken "planning rules" with "statutory nuisance" and "public health" laws.
Legal Beagle wrote:Have you even read the article? "the site has been operating legally for many number of years and is not contravening any planning rules"ajameson86 wrote: How can you complain when that business has been there for such a long time! Putting peoples jobs at risk by trying to cause issues to Mr Holt (an honest business man) I think is very selfish. Recycling is something this country should take more seriously, and with people like you Mr Hudson, we are only going to go backwards!This is an absurd attitude, and I suspect the comment has been written by either Mr Holt himself or one of his employees. The mere fact that the business has been there a long time doesn't allow them to escalate the scale of their operations so as to cause a nuisance to Mr Hudson and his neighbours. `Honest businessman' Mr Holt has an obligation to his neighbours to run his business in such a way that it does not impinge on their reasonable enjoyment of their property. If he is unwilling or unable to do so legal remedies such as an injunction may be exercised against the company.
midas says...
1:53pm Mon 26 Nov 12