Police commissioner election: A force for good or a recipe for disaster?

Clockwise from top left: Labour’s Clive Grunshaw, Tory Tim Ashton, Lib Dem Afzal Anwar and UKIP’s Robert Drobny

Clockwise from top left: Labour’s Clive Grunshaw, Tory Tim Ashton, Lib Dem Afzal Anwar and UKIP’s Robert Drobny

First published in News Lancashire Telegraph: Photograph of the Author by , Crime reporter

WITH powers to dismiss the Chief Constable, determine crime fighting priorities and control the policing budget, the new Police and Crime Commissioner will have huge potential to change how Lancashire bobbies operate.
With less than four days to the election to decide who will win the prestigious title and £85,000-a-year salary, Lancashire Telegraph crime reporter Vanessa Cornall examines the role and its implications for the force and the public.

AFTER spending more than £1 million in Lancashire alone on Thursday’s elections, the government is still facing the prospect of possibly the lowest turnout in any election held in this country.

There are fears that just one in ten electors will bother to go to the polls, giving rise to serious concerns about the ‘mandate’ that winning candidates will assume.

As for the role itself, opinions are polarised.

Those in support, including its chief backer David Cameron, point to the greater accountability afforded by the commissioner system which, they argue, will do more to address voter concerns.

Opponents’ concerns include fears that politics will be brought into play, with commissioners overstepping the boundaries and embracing policies which reflect their political dogma. Some sceptics say that PCCs may even start interfering in ongoing police operations and are worried they could abuse the power they will have to sack the chief constable.

The new supremo, who will set budgets, will replace the current Police Authority committee made up of councillors, magistrates and lay people in a move the government believes will bring sharp focus on the role of overseeing the county force with a single political figure knowing he or she will carry the can in an election every four years.

The big salary and high-profile role as Lancashire’s chief crimebuster have lured four candidates to throw their hats in the ring.

All four Lancashire candidates promise just that and pledge they will not be interfering in Chief Constable Steve Finnigan’s day-to-day decisions.

They are Liberal Democrat, Afzal Anwar, a barrister from Nelson; Conservative Tim Ashton, a Lancashire County Councillor for Lytham and formerly cabinet member for Highways and Transport; Labour county councillor Clive Grunshaw, a former member of Lancashire Police Authority from Fleetwood; and UK Independence Party candidate Robert Drobny, a former Deputy Mayor of Preesall near Poulton-le-Fylde.

Registered voters will have received polling cards telling them how and where to vote. Further details can be found at http://www.aboutmyvote. co.uk/how_do_i_vote/voting_systems/police_and_crime_ commissioner.aspx The commissioner will be scrutinised by a Police and Crime Panel (PCP), chaired by Blackburn with Darwen council leader Kate Hollern.

It will provide supervision of the new commissioner and guidance when he faces difficult and controversial issues while ensuring political leanings are not brought into play on operational issues.

The difficulty here, some argue, is that the panels themselves can sometimes have political agendas.

But concerns about the new system being over-politicised are likely to come down to the personalities involved.

In some areas, with voices of reason in play, it may well turn out to be a great success whereas other counties could see headline-grabbing PCCs acting irresponsibly. At its best, an effective commissioner will be a leader who brings councils and other local agencies together to improve the criminal justice system whether that’s tackling child protection issues, getting more bobbies on the beat or simply improving the processing of offenders through the courts.

And yes, the PCC should ensure that the chief constable is listening to the concerns of the public – without interfering in day-to-day operations.

In the coming weeks we will discover which type of commissioner we have voted in.

Comments (9)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

7:32pm Mon 12 Nov 12

Sutty the wise says...

Electing a leader for the local Police is a stupid idea. What next, vote for judges? Then every lawyer can be manipulated.
Electing a leader for the local Police is a stupid idea. What next, vote for judges? Then every lawyer can be manipulated. Sutty the wise
  • Score: 1

7:34pm Mon 12 Nov 12

mavrick says...

I hope this election is a total failure. The post of commissionaire has never been publicly debated. The majority of people don't want it or even know anything about it. The financially exclusive election is almost rigged. The idea should be scrapped in it's present form and the people of the country asked if they want such drastic change.
I hope this election is a total failure. The post of commissionaire has never been publicly debated. The majority of people don't want it or even know anything about it. The financially exclusive election is almost rigged. The idea should be scrapped in it's present form and the people of the country asked if they want such drastic change. mavrick
  • Score: 3

8:20pm Mon 12 Nov 12

ste.g says...

ask the voters at the next election if they want this,why are they forcing it on us????wasting millions on this farce.

we dont want it
ask the voters at the next election if they want this,why are they forcing it on us????wasting millions on this farce. we dont want it ste.g
  • Score: 4

8:23pm Mon 12 Nov 12

sean_brfc says...

If and when the turnout is pathetically low, I hope the government finally realises that the public can see numerous better ways to spend our money than the ludicrous cost of over-politicising and complicating policing.
If and when the turnout is pathetically low, I hope the government finally realises that the public can see numerous better ways to spend our money than the ludicrous cost of over-politicising and complicating policing. sean_brfc
  • Score: 4

9:00pm Mon 12 Nov 12

Is Eckersley playing? says...

sean_brfc wrote:
If and when the turnout is pathetically low, I hope the government finally realises that the public can see numerous better ways to spend our money than the ludicrous cost of over-politicising and complicating policing.
The trouble is, Sean, the money will have been spent on this nonsense. The best way to show our displeasure is for no-one to turn out and vote as you say. To have politicians meddling with the police is a recipe for disaster, total lunacy...
[quote][p][bold]sean_brfc[/bold] wrote: If and when the turnout is pathetically low, I hope the government finally realises that the public can see numerous better ways to spend our money than the ludicrous cost of over-politicising and complicating policing.[/p][/quote]The trouble is, Sean, the money will have been spent on this nonsense. The best way to show our displeasure is for no-one to turn out and vote as you say. To have politicians meddling with the police is a recipe for disaster, total lunacy... Is Eckersley playing?
  • Score: 2

12:39am Tue 13 Nov 12

english rose 1 says...

It is indeed a mad policy. But there will be an election on Thursday and there will be a winner.
*
If you want to show your displeasure about this policy then simply vote against those parties that implemented this stupid idea ! i.e. don't vote Tory or their Lib-Dem lap dogs !
It is indeed a mad policy. But there will be an election on Thursday and there will be a winner. * If you want to show your displeasure about this policy then simply vote against those parties that implemented this stupid idea ! i.e. don't vote Tory or their Lib-Dem lap dogs ! english rose 1
  • Score: 0

12:41am Tue 13 Nov 12

english rose 1 says...

mavrick wrote:
I hope this election is a total failure. The post of commissionaire has never been publicly debated. The majority of people don't want it or even know anything about it. The financially exclusive election is almost rigged. The idea should be scrapped in it's present form and the people of the country asked if they want such drastic change.
The Tories promised to implement this in their 2010 general election manifesto. Unfortunately the Lib-Dems agreed to it in the Coalition manifesto. (they used to be against it).
*
[quote][p][bold]mavrick[/bold] wrote: I hope this election is a total failure. The post of commissionaire has never been publicly debated. The majority of people don't want it or even know anything about it. The financially exclusive election is almost rigged. The idea should be scrapped in it's present form and the people of the country asked if they want such drastic change.[/p][/quote]The Tories promised to implement this in their 2010 general election manifesto. Unfortunately the Lib-Dems agreed to it in the Coalition manifesto. (they used to be against it). * english rose 1
  • Score: 2

9:19am Tue 13 Nov 12

midas says...

english rose 1 wrote:
It is indeed a mad policy. But there will be an election on Thursday and there will be a winner. * If you want to show your displeasure about this policy then simply vote against those parties that implemented this stupid idea ! i.e. don't vote Tory or their Lib-Dem lap dogs !
Rather than bringing party politics into it, how about voting for the person you think will do the best job!
[quote][p][bold]english rose 1[/bold] wrote: It is indeed a mad policy. But there will be an election on Thursday and there will be a winner. * If you want to show your displeasure about this policy then simply vote against those parties that implemented this stupid idea ! i.e. don't vote Tory or their Lib-Dem lap dogs ![/p][/quote]Rather than bringing party politics into it, how about voting for the person you think will do the best job! midas
  • Score: 2

9:44am Tue 13 Nov 12

A Darener says...

midas wrote:
english rose 1 wrote:
It is indeed a mad policy. But there will be an election on Thursday and there will be a winner. * If you want to show your displeasure about this policy then simply vote against those parties that implemented this stupid idea ! i.e. don't vote Tory or their Lib-Dem lap dogs !
Rather than bringing party politics into it, how about voting for the person you think will do the best job!
The person that will do the "best Job" is the Chief Constable. A man brought up through the ranks. A man that will know the police system inside out. A man well versed in the current law situation. We do NOT need an outsider who knows nothing about the workings of the police to "oversee" the Chief Constable. Just another " jobs for the boys ". Wasting thousands of pounds that could be spent on MORE police officers etc. I.e. Really fighting crime.
[quote][p][bold]midas[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]english rose 1[/bold] wrote: It is indeed a mad policy. But there will be an election on Thursday and there will be a winner. * If you want to show your displeasure about this policy then simply vote against those parties that implemented this stupid idea ! i.e. don't vote Tory or their Lib-Dem lap dogs ![/p][/quote]Rather than bringing party politics into it, how about voting for the person you think will do the best job![/p][/quote]The person that will do the "best Job" is the Chief Constable. A man brought up through the ranks. A man that will know the police system inside out. A man well versed in the current law situation. We do NOT need an outsider who knows nothing about the workings of the police to "oversee" the Chief Constable. Just another " jobs for the boys ". Wasting thousands of pounds that could be spent on MORE police officers etc. I.e. Really fighting crime. A Darener
  • Score: 0

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree