Poisoner sought after series of dog deaths in Blackburn (From Lancashire Telegraph)

Some sick people around but what does it take to get dog owners to clean up the mess. I know this is not the way to go about it but some owners will never learn. Just a handful of bad owners are the cause of this.

I wish the people motivated to kill these dogs would man up and pull the owners up instead.

It isn't the fault of the dogs and it's possible to end up harming the dog of an owner who *does* pick up after their pet.

The sad thing about this case is that I bet its the dogs of owners who do clean up after them are the ones that died. Not a good way to go about dealing with the issue at all.

The worst 'sad' thing is when people posting on these comments pages are just the same person with potentially dozens of usernames. Telegraph when ate you going to sort this out or do you 'encourage' or by letting it carry on?

Even worse, considering the jobs and positions some of them hold in society. Allowing them access to information under the data protection act and the criminal use thereof.

Like I said, if you are happy with this Telegraph then you only encourage it by inaction.

Dont be to surprised LT upon checking their ips some of them are pcsos. In fact I know one is. Kaching.

if this sicko killer is so concerned why not stand on the canal towpath with a camera and photograph the offending OWNERS?

it's not the dogs fault but it's them that this 'person' is torturing and killing.

As for the offending dog owners it only costs a quid for a 100 or so nappy sacks to clean up , if thats too much to spend to be responsible then should you really have a dog?

Be some old git who don't like dogs , if I saw anyone putting poison down I'd boot them in the canel

I fail to see how a dog could eat anything while being walked if they were on a LEAD as is proscribed by Law. Whilst the action of the poisoner is reprehensible, the dog owners have a duty of care as well.

Sajdin wrote:
Serves the dog owners right. Poor dogs died because of the owners !

Your backward , with your retarded answer , take it you don't like dogs , probably because of your religious , beliefs , glad I'm not religious ,

Some psycho sat at home plotting to poison animals , needs to be caught for and jailed for administrating poisons in a public area ,

phil kernot wrote:
Some psycho sat at home plotting to poison animals , needs to be caught for and jailed for administrating poisons in a public area ,

Whilst not condoning any action leading to the death of even one dog aren't the irresponsible dog owners "administering poison" by allowing their dogs to foul the towpath and pavements? Dog faeces are responsible for a disease causing blindness and other nasty ailments. There has to be a change in the attitude of some dog owners. What if it was their child affected by these faeces.

I dont condone these actions either but many people are sick of ignorant and selfish dog owners who pretend they cant see their dog sh*ttng all over the place or carry bags with no intention of using them or use them and throw the bags anywhere after.
Also of aggressive dog owners of aggressive dogs who just wish to intimidate or worse.
The law does not protect adequately, people just dont care.
if any good comes from this it may make owners take more care in future.

This is 1 saddo who needs catching and quick!! Who next bike riders, kids, walkers?? U's knocking dog owners (which i am 1 but dont use the canal) would be up in arms if it was someone you knew??! Anybody sad enough + have all this time on their hands to summat so deranged needs locking away quickly!! Fingers crossed that this doesnt happen but it only needs a toddler to fall over + find something quickly and bang u lot wont be defending this nutter so quickly!!!!

phil kernot wrote:

Sajdin wrote:
Serves the dog owners right. Poor dogs died because of the owners !

Your backward , with your retarded answer , take it you don't like dogs , probably because of your religious , beliefs , glad I'm not religious ,

Are you failing to see a justified comment?

Its not a religious issue and has no relevance at all here but neglectful dog owners being questioned and in the spotight.
You don't have to be a faith believer to have some common sense, atleast a bit of good judgment should be sufficient.
Hope that's not too much to ask from you!

We walk our whippet dog from the bridge at Feniscowles all the way to the old sun paper mill and then up through the cricket club area. There are no dog waste bins at all on that whole stretch but we still act as responsible dog owners and pick up and bag the waste and then have to carry it with us for the whole walk! Please get more dog bins along the canal walk. I'm positive people would use them. It is one of our favourite walks but we are worried about this.

I used to RESPONSIBLY walk my dog on the canal at Feniscowles and always picked up and disposed of dog mess. Not anymore because of someone's dispicable actions. I hope the person who has done this is proud of him/herself? It this is about dog mess, irresponsible owners should be held to account and not resort to the killing of defenceless animals.....

If the people who do this think the towpath is bad, they should come and look at the area of Darwen where I live. Every morning, there are several huge mounds, and, I mean mounds, of the stuff on the pavements. Perhaps the answer might be to poison the owners instead.

Darren1951 wrote:
If the people who do this think the towpath is bad, they should come and look at the area of Darwen where I live. Every morning, there are several huge mounds, and, I mean mounds, of the stuff on the pavements. Perhaps the answer might be to poison the owners instead.

That's more than likely to be human excrement though.

LiveseyBranchRover wrote:

Darren1951 wrote: If the people who do this think the towpath is bad, they should come and look at the area of Darwen where I live. Every morning, there are several huge mounds, and, I mean mounds, of the stuff on the pavements. Perhaps the answer might be to poison the owners instead.

That's more than likely to be human excrement though.

So, poison them too; might as well make a cleab sweep and get rid of you at the same time, you total moron

"That's more than likely to be human excrement though" - best laugh for ages
I know of a place we called dogsh*t alley as a child. I was pleased to see the effort that had been put in to cleaning the place up! dog litter bins galore.
Careful owners were picking their dogs mess up in the bags - and then flinging it into the bush - the local kids now call this the dogsh*t tree
Some things never change!

sen c b l wrote:

phil kernot wrote:

Sajdin wrote:
Serves the dog owners right. Poor dogs died because of the owners !

Your backward , with your retarded answer , take it you don't like dogs , probably because of your religious , beliefs , glad I'm not religious ,

Are you failing to see a justified comment?

Its not a religious issue and has no relevance at all here but neglectful dog owners being questioned and in the spotight.
You don't have to be a faith believer to have some common sense, atleast a bit of good judgment should be sufficient.
Hope that's not too much to ask from you!

Quote: You don’t have to be a faith believer to have common sense.

Since when have faith believers had common sense?

Some faith believers believe that bleeding animals to death while they’re still alive is necessary. So let’s hope that if there is someone laying poison they soon gain enough common sense to realise that it’s just a cruel thing to do. For whatever reason!

JohnR1 wrote:
I fail to see how a dog could eat anything while being walked if they were on a LEAD as is proscribed by Law. Whilst the action of the poisoner is reprehensible, the dog owners have a duty of care as well.

Hi John,

You fail to see presumably because you don't have a dog. I walk my dog exclusively on a lead, and a sniff of the ground very quickly can turn into your dog eating something - more often than not takeaway food thrown onto the ground by careless people who have little regard for their environment. I try and remove whatever she's eaten, but sometimes that can be quite tricky. I probably have more reason than most to hate dog muck as I spend hours each day walking my dog through areas where there are piles just left, waiting to be stood on. I always carry bags, always keep an eye on my dog, and always pick up. However, using this as an excuse to poison dogs is inexcusable - people should report dog fouling to the relevant authorities, not take the law into their own hands This person is a heartless sinister vigilante and whose actions shouldn't be applauded.

district01 wrote:

sen c b l wrote:

phil kernot wrote:

Sajdin wrote:
Serves the dog owners right. Poor dogs died because of the owners !

Your backward , with your retarded answer , take it you don't like dogs , probably because of your religious , beliefs , glad I'm not religious ,

Are you failing to see a justified comment?

Its not a religious issue and has no relevance at all here but neglectful dog owners being questioned and in the spotight.
You don't have to be a faith believer to have some common sense, atleast a bit of good judgment should be sufficient.
Hope that's not too much to ask from you!

Quote: You don’t have to be a faith believer to have common sense.

Since when have faith believers had common sense?

Some faith believers believe that bleeding animals to death while they’re still alive is necessary. So let’s hope that if there is someone laying poison they soon gain enough common sense to realise that it’s just a cruel thing to do. For whatever reason!

Likewise some faith believers will regard those who oppose bleeding an animal prior to consuming its meat as ludicrous and the necessity of performing slaughter, as a must. They will also see stunning an animal with low voltage as an act that seriously needs researching thoroughly. Most abbatoirs report that stunning results in an animal being knocked out for a peroid of 15-20 seconds. After this period the animal is back to normal and during the 20 seconds, it is alive and breathing. This means that when the animal is slaughtered, the animal would bleed the same way as it would when not stunned. In some circumstances animals have died as a result of stunning and can only be compared to a violent blow.

sen c b l wrote:

district01 wrote:

sen c b l wrote:

phil kernot wrote:

Sajdin wrote:
Serves the dog owners right. Poor dogs died because of the owners !

Your backward , with your retarded answer , take it you don't like dogs , probably because of your religious , beliefs , glad I'm not religious ,

Are you failing to see a justified comment?

Its not a religious issue and has no relevance at all here but neglectful dog owners being questioned and in the spotight.
You don't have to be a faith believer to have some common sense, atleast a bit of good judgment should be sufficient.
Hope that's not too much to ask from you!

Quote: You don’t have to be a faith believer to have common sense.

Since when have faith believers had common sense?

Some faith believers believe that bleeding animals to death while they’re still alive is necessary. So let’s hope that if there is someone laying poison they soon gain enough common sense to realise that it’s just a cruel thing to do. For whatever reason!

Likewise some faith believers will regard those who oppose bleeding an animal prior to consuming its meat as ludicrous and the necessity of performing slaughter, as a must. They will also see stunning an animal with low voltage as an act that seriously needs researching thoroughly. Most abbatoirs report that stunning results in an animal being knocked out for a peroid of 15-20 seconds. After this period the animal is back to normal and during the 20 seconds, it is alive and breathing. This means that when the animal is slaughtered, the animal would bleed the same way as it would when not stunned. In some circumstances animals have died as a result of stunning and can only be compared to a violent blow.

Your understanding and knowledge of the meat industry is frightening . . .

. . . and you still eat meat?

district01 wrote:

sen c b l wrote:

district01 wrote:

sen c b l wrote:

phil kernot wrote:

Sajdin wrote:
Serves the dog owners right. Poor dogs died because of the owners !

Your backward , with your retarded answer , take it you don't like dogs , probably because of your religious , beliefs , glad I'm not religious ,

Are you failing to see a justified comment?

Its not a religious issue and has no relevance at all here but neglectful dog owners being questioned and in the spotight.
You don't have to be a faith believer to have some common sense, atleast a bit of good judgment should be sufficient.
Hope that's not too much to ask from you!

Quote: You don’t have to be a faith believer to have common sense.

Since when have faith believers had common sense?

Some faith believers believe that bleeding animals to death while they’re still alive is necessary. So let’s hope that if there is someone laying poison they soon gain enough common sense to realise that it’s just a cruel thing to do. For whatever reason!

Likewise some faith believers will regard those who oppose bleeding an animal prior to consuming its meat as ludicrous and the necessity of performing slaughter, as a must. They will also see stunning an animal with low voltage as an act that seriously needs researching thoroughly. Most abbatoirs report that stunning results in an animal being knocked out for a peroid of 15-20 seconds. After this period the animal is back to normal and during the 20 seconds, it is alive and breathing. This means that when the animal is slaughtered, the animal would bleed the same way as it would when not stunned. In some circumstances animals have died as a result of stunning and can only be compared to a violent blow.

Your understanding and knowledge of the meat industry is frightening . . .

. . . and you still eat meat?

What do you mean 'your understanding and knowledge'?
Probably you should seriously consider increasing your knowledge based on facts and evidence provided by personnels within the relevant business sector, and when you do your nightmares will become a terrifying reality.........and yes I really do enjoy my meat provided its not scandalous!!!

sen c b l wrote:

district01 wrote:

sen c b l wrote:

district01 wrote:

sen c b l wrote:

phil kernot wrote:

Sajdin wrote:
Serves the dog owners right. Poor dogs died because of the owners !

Your backward , with your retarded answer , take it you don't like dogs , probably because of your religious , beliefs , glad I'm not religious ,

Are you failing to see a justified comment?

Its not a religious issue and has no relevance at all here but neglectful dog owners being questioned and in the spotight.
You don't have to be a faith believer to have some common sense, atleast a bit of good judgment should be sufficient.
Hope that's not too much to ask from you!

Quote: You don’t have to be a faith believer to have common sense.

Since when have faith believers had common sense?

Some faith believers believe that bleeding animals to death while they’re still alive is necessary. So let’s hope that if there is someone laying poison they soon gain enough common sense to realise that it’s just a cruel thing to do. For whatever reason!

Likewise some faith believers will regard those who oppose bleeding an animal prior to consuming its meat as ludicrous and the necessity of performing slaughter, as a must. They will also see stunning an animal with low voltage as an act that seriously needs researching thoroughly. Most abbatoirs report that stunning results in an animal being knocked out for a peroid of 15-20 seconds. After this period the animal is back to normal and during the 20 seconds, it is alive and breathing. This means that when the animal is slaughtered, the animal would bleed the same way as it would when not stunned. In some circumstances animals have died as a result of stunning and can only be compared to a violent blow.

Your understanding and knowledge of the meat industry is frightening . . .

. . . and you still eat meat?

What do you mean 'your understanding and knowledge'?
Probably you should seriously consider increasing your knowledge based on facts and evidence provided by personnels within the relevant business sector, and when you do your nightmares will become a terrifying reality.........and yes I really do enjoy my meat provided its not scandalous!!!

Enjoy your sleep my friend!

And we are a nation of animal lovers, not

A Darener wrote:

phil kernot wrote:
Some psycho sat at home plotting to poison animals , needs to be caught for and jailed for administrating poisons in a public area ,

Whilst not condoning any action leading to the death of even one dog aren't the irresponsible dog owners "administering poison" by allowing their dogs to foul the towpath and pavements? Dog faeces are responsible for a disease causing blindness and other nasty ailments. There has to be a change in the attitude of some dog owners. What if it was their child affected by these faeces.

Ha, and just what disease can you get from dog poop that causes blindiness? Really?! Wow. But you know what? What if someone's child got into the poison, now that could cause some "nasty ailments", dont ya think?

How very sad, where will this end?
Why don't the people who use the area get together Sunday armed with gloves & bags and have a mass clean up campaign . Come on folks have a little pride and clean it up:-).
No animal should suffer for human errors.

twostellas wrote:

A Darener wrote:

phil kernot wrote:
Some psycho sat at home plotting to poison animals , needs to be caught for and jailed for administrating poisons in a public area ,

Whilst not condoning any action leading to the death of even one dog aren't the irresponsible dog owners "administering poison" by allowing their dogs to foul the towpath and pavements? Dog faeces are responsible for a disease causing blindness and other nasty ailments. There has to be a change in the attitude of some dog owners. What if it was their child affected by these faeces.

Ha, and just what disease can you get from dog poop that causes blindiness? Really?! Wow. But you know what? What if someone's child got into the poison, now that could cause some "nasty ailments", dont ya think?

Toxocariasis is an infestation of humans, usually children, with the larvae of Toxocara canis, a small threadlike worm that resides in a dog's intestine.A dog harbouring the small round worm causes large numbers of worm eggs in its faeces, which can then contaminate the soil.

I hope the sick excuse for a human being who has done this cowardly despicable act dies a slow and painful death, in fact I put a curse on them to do so. I don't say this lightly; I'm sat here at 5.00 am in the morning after expensive visits to the Vet nursing a very sick dog who is suffering from a suspected poisoning. The cost isn't a problem, the little girl, God willing will make it, It's the fact that someone can plan and go out, and do such a premeditated act of cruelty. Trust me people, they're very mentally sick and they walk among us!

Let's just hope that the police find the mentally-challenged old git before some of the dead pet owners do.

Poison would probably be the least of his/her worries.

heard its 'spread' to witton park, where not only do i take my dog and clean up any 'mess' she makes, but where children play. When they catch this moron they should feed him/her rat poison. 90 per cent of the dog walkers at witton park clean up after their animals, this is sick and angers me as i am sure it angers most people. Id love to catch you at it and see how clever you are then.

heard its 'spread' to witton park, where not only do i take my dog and clean up any 'mess' she makes, but where children play. When they catch this moron they should feed him/her rat poison. 90 per cent of the dog walkers at witton park clean up after their animals, this is sick and angers me as i am sure it angers most people. Id love to catch you at it and see how clever you are then.

drewster wrote:
heard its 'spread' to witton park, where not only do i take my dog and clean up any 'mess' she makes, but where children play. When they catch this moron they should feed him/her rat poison. 90 per cent of the dog walkers at witton park clean up after their animals, this is sick and angers me as i am sure it angers most people. Id love to catch you at it and see how clever you are then.

It is not the 90% the poisoner is after! Perhaps his child has been blinded by dog faeces and he is after revenge. Agreed it is the wrong way to go about it but dog owners must take responsibility for their dogs. It is not the dogs fault.