Latest ‘super school’ opens doors to Blackburn and Darwen pupils (From Lancashire Telegraph)

The liquorice allsort design certainly makes me hungry.

ghanto wrote:
Welcome to tjhe school the school with people with learning difficulties

Central high school with CROSSHILL

Pleackgate school is name for mathametics and computing college but idiots named it as " CROSSHILL"

24 million pounds and name says it all

Maybe you should go to school, to practice English!

Why should anyone be ashamed of a school for children with learning dificulties?

If your children are embarrassed about being on the same site as children with learning difficulties, then the problem is with how they have been brought up not the school.

ghanto wrote:
People build school and name it "MATHAMETICS AND COMPUTING COLLEGE etc
BUT this school is named

Centeral high schoool with crosshills

Crosshill is a school for people with learning difficulties

LOGO on childrens uniform makes then embarrassed becuase it says "crosshills"

Idiots outhere have no concerns but i got my children out of there as soon as i found out the name of the school and logo

Ghanto the Panto.

Your comments are regarded as discrimation against children with difficulties of no fault of their own. You never know how lucky you are that it's not your children with severe learning difficulties.

For you to remove yours, you're a bigger idiot!

bit confused by this ghanto persons argument its children should not go to the new blackburn central high school because on the same site sharing some of the facilities are some pupils who have additional support needs? ghanto has an issue because the pupils who attend the crosshill part of the school have blazers with badges identifying their school and then this ghanto states "it wouldve been better if both children had different logos there was no need for healthy and good children to have crosshill logos " healthy and good children? what on earth does that mean? and by the way ghanto making the offensive comments about comparisons with "mental street" etc is something that most children and young people with learning support needs would have better manners than to do. you never know give the school a chance your prejudices might be overcome if you actually get past the issue of a name badge to differentiate different parts of the school

ghanto wrote:

sen c ble wrote:

ghanto wrote: People build school and name it "MATHAMETICS AND COMPUTING COLLEGE etc BUT this school is named Centeral high schoool with crosshills Crosshill is a school for people with learning difficulties LOGO on childrens uniform makes then embarrassed becuase it says "crosshills" Idiots outhere have no concerns but i got my children out of there as soon as i found out the name of the school and logo

Ghanto the Panto. Your comments are regarded as discrimation against children with difficulties of no fault of their own. You never know how lucky you are that it's not your children with severe learning difficulties. For you to remove yours, you're a bigger idiot!

its not discrimination its a saying that if our children are with god grace are healthy and professional why name the school as crosshills

how would you feel if your street is named mental street??????

Brains man brains

"Brains man brains"

By the way you write, what you think is, English, and, your dark ages attitude to kids with learning difficulties, you've proven that when it comes to brains man brains -

YOU AINT GOT NON!!!!!!!

ghanto wrote:

sen c ble wrote:

ghanto wrote: People build school and name it "MATHAMETICS AND COMPUTING COLLEGE etc BUT this school is named Centeral high schoool with crosshills Crosshill is a school for people with learning difficulties LOGO on childrens uniform makes then embarrassed becuase it says "crosshills" Idiots outhere have no concerns but i got my children out of there as soon as i found out the name of the school and logo

Ghanto the Panto. Your comments are regarded as discrimation against children with difficulties of no fault of their own. You never know how lucky you are that it's not your children with severe learning difficulties. For you to remove yours, you're a bigger idiot!

its not discrimination its a saying that if our children are with god grace are healthy and professional why name the school as crosshills

how would you feel if your street is named mental street??????

Brains man brains

You stupid idiotic woman.

If you go to great lengths to remove your gremlin children from a school that once were educating children with learning difficulties just for the sake of a name, I would not doubt your retarded capability that you would similarily remove your strange offspring and enrol in a land specifically for your alien type where ET and ALF were once attending.

You're not welcome in any Lancashire school, so 4off.

I'm in shock reading what this ghanto person has been writing, I honestly think if ever a persons IP address should be handed over to the appropriate authorities it's now, I'm appalled.

adamdesk wrote:
if people out there are so professionals then argue t with the school and coumncil why they discriminated between the crosshill pupils and the central high school pupils and why both were given different names and different building

If this is not discrimitative then how suggesting different uniform for different school be discriminative ?????????????

Children with learning difficulties requires special attention and a lot of patience from teacher's educating them, and yes a separate building.

To deliberately target certain children by taking action so it may not be regarded that it's relevant to you, is discrimination. Does Brockhall ring a bell? Would it be sensible for the people of that village to request a name change!

Why is it Ghanto has removed her gremlin children if there are two separate buildings?

adamdesk wrote:
There are 2 seperate pupils educating, there are 2 seperate names there are 2 seperate buildings
these are not claased as discrimination BUT ghanto asking the school to have seperate logos for two sepearate pupils is discrimination ??

WHAT RUBBISH its simply Jealousy and something the council & school didnt though of which is now too late as uniforms are made

I suggests you employ ghanto phanto in the future

Jealousy! What total garbage talk is this.

You fancy calling me an idiot in my prescence?

Sen.

There are an awful lot of idiotic, bigoted people on this blog! Everyone is different but all have their strengths. Embrace all, and see what a wonderful society we would have. Segregate, and you end up with ghettos. Nuff said!

adamdesk wrote:

sen c ble wrote:

adamdesk wrote: There are 2 seperate pupils educating, there are 2 seperate names there are 2 seperate buildings these are not claased as discrimination BUT ghanto asking the school to have seperate logos for two sepearate pupils is discrimination ?? WHAT RUBBISH its simply Jealousy and something the council & school didnt though of which is now too late as uniforms are made I suggests you employ ghanto phanto in the future

Jealousy! What total garbage talk is this. You fancy calling me an idiot in my prescence? Sen.

yes

Well in that case meet me somewhere. Name the place.

Has adamdesk actually looked at the propsectus or the website for this school?
Crosshills is NOT a separate school; it is an integral part of BCHS. From what I have just read, it can best be viewed as a "house" within the main school structure which just happens to have its own building. There is one management team, one headteacher. Inclusivity is the theme of the school.
So no, there is no call for a separate uniform: the students amalgamated into the new school on the Witton Park site won't have one......
So yes, adamdesk, ghanto is discriminatory in his / her posts and so are you. Why should Crosshill students be stigmatised? Why should that be allowed to continue? Before you spout your thoughts, try and get your facts straight.......

adamdesk wrote:

ladysal wrote: Has adamdesk actually looked at the propsectus or the website for this school? Crosshills is NOT a separate school; it is an integral part of BCHS. From what I have just read, it can best be viewed as a "house" within the main school structure which just happens to have its own building. There is one management team, one headteacher. Inclusivity is the theme of the school. So no, there is no call for a separate uniform: the students amalgamated into the new school on the Witton Park site won't have one...... So yes, adamdesk, ghanto is discriminatory in his / her posts and so are you. Why should Crosshill students be stigmatised? Why should that be allowed to continue? Before you spout your thoughts, try and get your facts straight.......

GET OUT

????????????????????
?

adamdesk wrote:
INTIGERATED SEPERATE PART, SEPERATE NAME, SEPERATE TEACHING, SPEC IAL TEACHERS, SPECIAL CARE NEED PUPILS NAME IT AS CROSSHILLS IS CLEARLY DISCRIMINATION BUT SEPERATE UNIFORM FOR CROSSHILLS AND SEPERATE FOR BCHS IS DISCRIMINATION WHAT ARE IDITOS NOTHING TO SAY THEN STUR UP

Let me break it down for you:
INTIGERATED SEPERATE PART (which is it: it can't be both.....), SEPERATE NAME (the name isn't seperate: it is called BCHS with Crosshill),
SEPERATE TEACHING (and? There will be separate teachers teaching different subjects, year groups, ability levels through the school),
SPEC IAL TEACHERS (most schools have those, they are called subject specialists),
SPECIAL CARE NEED PUPILS NAME IT AS CROSSHILLS IS CLEARLY DISCRIMINATION BUT SEPERATE UNIFORM FOR CROSSHILLS AND SEPERATE FOR BCHS IS DISCRIMINATION (I have no idea what you are trying to say: the entire sentence doesn't make sense)
WHAT ARE IDITOS NOTHING TO SAY THEN STUR UP (Please, do us a favour: stop shouting, there is no need. Learn to spell and use grammar. Try and put a reasoned argument together before going off on a rant)

At least I'm prepared to research something I know little about before putting in my tuppenyworth.......

adamdesk wrote:
INTIGERATED SEPERATE PART, SEPERATE NAME, SEPERATE TEACHING, SPEC IAL TEACHERS, SPECIAL CARE NEED PUPILS
NAME IT AS CROSSHILLS IS CLEARLY DISCRIMINATION

BUT SEPERATE UNIFORM FOR CROSSHILLS AND SEPERATE FOR BCHS IS DISCRIMINATION

WHAT ARE IDITOS
NOTHING TO SAY THEN STUR UP

Learn to discuss.

Continue in this pathetic manner and you'll end up with a 5lap across your *kin face!

adamdesk wrote:

ladysal wrote:

adamdesk wrote: INTIGERATED SEPERATE PART, SEPERATE NAME, SEPERATE TEACHING, SPEC IAL TEACHERS, SPECIAL CARE NEED PUPILS NAME IT AS CROSSHILLS IS CLEARLY DISCRIMINATION BUT SEPERATE UNIFORM FOR CROSSHILLS AND SEPERATE FOR BCHS IS DISCRIMINATION WHAT ARE IDITOS NOTHING TO SAY THEN STUR UP

Let me break it down for you: INTIGERATED SEPERATE PART (which is it: it can't be both.....), SEPERATE NAME (the name isn't seperate: it is called BCHS with Crosshill), SEPERATE TEACHING (and? There will be separate teachers teaching different subjects, year groups, ability levels through the school), SPEC IAL TEACHERS (most schools have those, they are called subject specialists), SPECIAL CARE NEED PUPILS NAME IT AS CROSSHILLS IS CLEARLY DISCRIMINATION BUT SEPERATE UNIFORM FOR CROSSHILLS AND SEPERATE FOR BCHS IS DISCRIMINATION (I have no idea what you are trying to say: the entire sentence doesn't make sense) WHAT ARE IDITOS NOTHING TO SAY THEN STUR UP (Please, do us a favour: stop shouting, there is no need. Learn to spell and use grammar. Try and put a reasoned argument together before going off on a rant) At least I'm prepared to research something I know little about before putting in my tuppenyworth.......

Have you got too much time to repond to comments

I have a job for road sweeper

Do you work for the council or some authority, if so tell me where?

adamdesk wrote:

ladysal wrote:

adamdesk wrote: INTIGERATED SEPERATE PART, SEPERATE NAME, SEPERATE TEACHING, SPEC IAL TEACHERS, SPECIAL CARE NEED PUPILS NAME IT AS CROSSHILLS IS CLEARLY DISCRIMINATION BUT SEPERATE UNIFORM FOR CROSSHILLS AND SEPERATE FOR BCHS IS DISCRIMINATION WHAT ARE IDITOS NOTHING TO SAY THEN STUR UP

Let me break it down for you: INTIGERATED SEPERATE PART (which is it: it can't be both.....), SEPERATE NAME (the name isn't seperate: it is called BCHS with Crosshill), SEPERATE TEACHING (and? There will be separate teachers teaching different subjects, year groups, ability levels through the school), SPEC IAL TEACHERS (most schools have those, they are called subject specialists), SPECIAL CARE NEED PUPILS NAME IT AS CROSSHILLS IS CLEARLY DISCRIMINATION BUT SEPERATE UNIFORM FOR CROSSHILLS AND SEPERATE FOR BCHS IS DISCRIMINATION (I have no idea what you are trying to say: the entire sentence doesn't make sense) WHAT ARE IDITOS NOTHING TO SAY THEN STUR UP (Please, do us a favour: stop shouting, there is no need. Learn to spell and use grammar. Try and put a reasoned argument together before going off on a rant) At least I'm prepared to research something I know little about before putting in my tuppenyworth.......

Have you got too much time to repond to comments I have a job for road sweeper

I have enough. They are called lunch breaks, tea breaks, etc.
No, I don't need a job as a road sweeper thank you.
I leave comments because I enjoy informed, intelligent debate or because somebody says something so outrageous that it winds me up so much I can't help myself.
Guess which category you fall into.......

Goodness what a lot of ignorant people have commented on this! The school was built so that pupils with educational and special needs and pupils with no educational or special needs can be integrated in society without anybody being able to call them out on being different. Basically teaching all children that IGNORANCE is NOT ACCEPTABLE. It is not acceptable for children with educational needs to be singled out as 'mental' or 'unruly' nor is it acceptable to class children with no educational needs as 'normal'. They are children, they are human and each one is unique, be it that one may need help controlling ADHD or be it that another may be an A* student. People on here haven't seemed to realise this because of their own IGNORANCE. Ghanto if you have pulled your children out of this school because they were ashamed to be associated with Crosshill then shame on you. My question to you is why should pupils at Crosshill want to wear the same uniform as your ignorant children? They are what you teach them. Adamdesk, surely all children wearing the same uniform makes them all feel like not one child is better than another? By Crosshill pupils wearing a different uniform do you not think they would be upset at being singled out from other children just because they have a learning difficulty? They are still children for crying out loud! You would not even be able to tell that some of the students at Crosshill have any learning difficulties unless they told you. Same for some of the pupils who attend Central High School, you may think with their behaviour that they were in fact attending Crosshill when they are being disruptive in a classroom. The whole 50 comments above were ridiculous. This is a school. It has pupils who attend it. Whether those pupils are black, white, mixed race, have ADHD, are A* students, are dislexic or anything else society likes to label, they are all CHILDREN. NOT ONE SHOULD BE TREATED DIFFERENTLY. I pity ignorant folk, I really do.....

ghanto wrote:
my sympathy goes to all children with learning difficulties and hope you recover soon

However the children cannot be discriminated or neglected

We cannot force a pupil with learning difficulties to learn to cross the road some learn some takes time

Different uinform can alert police, teachers and others of special needs and they can be helped where necessary

These idiots above like ladysal etc wants to comment and make a stupid issue and bang their head against the wall becuase they need treatment

people with special needs play openly as they are already mix with other children go out but unfortunately they have to be looked after and different uniform or logos wouldve helped

There is nothing embarrassed about it they are normal humans who takes time to learn

so keep your mouth shut and so back to brockhall school or tell you mum or dad to teach you how to respect

Children with learning difficulties are not classified as 'mentally disabled or require extra attention to live their normal life's. Instead they are classified as 'learning difficulties' because they require extra help and attention when being taught in class. This may be because they are not as brilliant as other children we expect and requires extra time to learn simple tasks. Where normal children would tackle simple subjects with ease, others would take longer and these are the children that are known as 'children with learning difficulties'.
I am aware Crosshill did teach these children and still does, but because they have now linked up with other schools to become a super school, the name Crosshill is not welcomed by certain parents, thus the objection. This may be because within friends and families this may be an embarrasment and discomfort.

I am a man of discipline. One insulting word and I will come out with a mouthfull!

hewdale wrote:
Goodness what a lot of ignorant people have commented on this! The school was built so that pupils with educational and special needs and pupils with no educational or special needs can be integrated in society without anybody being able to call them out on being different. Basically teaching all children that IGNORANCE is NOT ACCEPTABLE. It is not acceptable for children with educational needs to be singled out as 'mental' or 'unruly' nor is it acceptable to class children with no educational needs as 'normal'. They are children, they are human and each one is unique, be it that one may need help controlling ADHD or be it that another may be an A* student. People on here haven't seemed to realise this because of their own IGNORANCE. Ghanto if you have pulled your children out of this school because they were ashamed to be associated with Crosshill then shame on you. My question to you is why should pupils at Crosshill want to wear the same uniform as your ignorant children? They are what you teach them. Adamdesk, surely all children wearing the same uniform makes them all feel like not one child is better than another? By Crosshill pupils wearing a different uniform do you not think they would be upset at being singled out from other children just because they have a learning difficulty? They are still children for crying out loud! You would not even be able to tell that some of the students at Crosshill have any learning difficulties unless they told you. Same for some of the pupils who attend Central High School, you may think with their behaviour that they were in fact attending Crosshill when they are being disruptive in a classroom. The whole 50 comments above were ridiculous. This is a school. It has pupils who attend it. Whether those pupils are black, white, mixed race, have ADHD, are A* students, are dislexic or anything else society likes to label, they are all CHILDREN. NOT ONE SHOULD BE TREATED DIFFERENTLY. I pity ignorant folk, I really do.....

crosshill was made for u