News RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


LT block logo JOIN THE DEBATE BY ADDING YOUR COMMENTS ON THESE STORIES

Registering to post comments on the Lancashire Telegraph website only takes a few seconds. Click here to go to the registration page.

16 Lancashire Police officers have criminal records


SIXTEEN Lancashire police officers have criminal records, it has emerged.

The offences include common assault, theft, drink driving, dangerous driving and criminal damage.

Four officers committed crimes while in the force and have kept their job.

The remaining offences happened before the other 12 officers joined the police.

An MP said officers who committed crimes while in the police should be sacked.

He called for ‘greater transparency’ as the details were only uncovered by the Lancashire Telegraph using the Freedom of Information act.

A solicitor said lawyers also needed to know about the incidents as they criminal records could potentially affect an officer’s credibility in court.

Police bosses stressed that the total of 16 was a drop in the ocean of the force’s 3,500 officers.

However they declined to explain the circumstances behind each of the crimes, saying each case was assessed on an individual basis.

Forces should not recruit people with cautions or convictions that may call into question the integrity of the applicant or the service, according to Home Office guidance.

The decision of whether this is the case is left up to individual force’s judgement.

Coun David Whipp, a member of Lancashire Police Authority which oversees the management of the force, was surprised by the Lancashire Telegraph’s findings.

He said: “I certainly wasn’t aware of this being the case, but I do know there is a high level of standards required for the recruits and the vetting process is extremely thorough.

“I will ask some questions about this matter following the information that has been revealed by the Lancashire Telegraph.”

Ribble Valley MP Nigel Evans called for more transparency within the police force.

He said: "Obviously we don't know details of these particular cases and I think those who have spent convictions should be allowed to re-establish themselves in the community.

“That said, those who have committed offences while working for the police should be sacked.

“I think the public have the right to know that people who are there to uphold the law are practicing what they preach."

Leeds-based solicitor Simon Purchas, who specialises in public law and actions against the police, said he was ‘concerned’ about officers with assault and theft convictions.

He said: "Lawyers should be made aware of these convictions if an officer with a conviction is a witness in court because they may be relevant to the officers credibility.

“I find it extraordinary that an officer with a theft conviction is allowed to uphold the law.

"The fundamental role of a police officer is honesty.

"These findings raise a lot more serious questions.”

John O’Reilly, chairman of Lancashire Police Federation, representing rank and file, said there was a vigorous vetting process for police applicants.

He said: “I know for example that if an officer was convicted of a drink driving offence it would be 10 years before they would even be considered to join.

"A drunk and disorderly offence would be five years and if you didn’t declare it and it later came to light you would quite simply be out.

“When there is a conviction for theft which calls into question an officer’s integrity they would have to show they have moved on and made a decent life since.”

Chief Superintendent Clive Tattum, head of professional standards for Lancashire Constabulary, said they tried to balance individual’s history with how their skills could improve the force.

He said: “It should be remembered that there are more than 3,500 police officers in the county, the overwhelming majority of whom serve the public with dedication and behave professionally, ethically and with integrity.”

Similar investigations elsewhere have found there are 70 officers with convictions in the Metropolitan police which has 31,000 staff and 50 in the 4,400-strong Merseyside force.

Key questions

We asked Lancashire Constabulary how many officers had criminal records.

The force replied: One sergeant and 15 police constables, 12 of them committing crimes before they joined the police.

Four had been convicted of criminal damage, two of drink-driving, four of theft, one for dangerous driving, two of drunk and disorderly and two of common assault. The force did not disclose one of the convictions.

Five of the 16 were serving in East Lancashire, two at headquarters and the remaining nine elsewhere in the county.

Comments(18)

akon says...
9:54am Wed 18 Feb 09

The offences include common assault, theft, drink driving, dangerous driving and criminal damage.

Four officers committed crimes while in the force and have kept their jobs.
And they have a witch-hunt of a serving officer who happens to be a member of the BNP ( a legitimate political party)?
Wonder what the ethnicity is,of the officers who have kept their jobs.

loobeylu says...
10:11am Wed 18 Feb 09

That would be about right for our police today, they are bigger than the criminals themselves in a lot of areas, not surprised me one bit,and i bet it doesnt suprise many either.

Robbie says...
10:12am Wed 18 Feb 09

sorry but what does it matter if they have a recored? as long as it does not stop them doing their, who give a stuff!

as for the bnp memeber who is also an officer... again.. as long as he does his job and his personal beliefs dont effect his work then again i dont give a stuff.

these officers sometimes risk injury or worst to protect us.. no one is perfect, NO ONE!.. give them a break for god sake! back off an support our officers for once.

Tee-Hee says...
11:49am Wed 18 Feb 09

Just out of interest, how many Telegraph staff have records? We're trusting them to provide honest, factual information.

mazzgomaz says...
12:46pm Wed 18 Feb 09

CRB checks for taxi drivers, care workers, social workers, school teachers and many more people have to submit and to bare their sole to get a job and yet we are Policed by criminals, what an endicetment of our society.
In these columns, in recent weeks we have read of a local PEER of the realm, taxi drivers and social care workers flounting the rules and now now to find that the Police are also on the bandwaggon comes as no surprise, does it.

sideways says...
3:43pm Wed 18 Feb 09

i would like to know if the 18 policemen pleaded guilty at there own court cases or/ did they take the oath and say not guilty, if the latter, then surely their swear on oath on the publics court cases cannot be trusted.i am a 67 year woman and i am disgusted that they are still on the force-- get rid

jingandjang says...
4:53pm Wed 18 Feb 09

What a farce, its once again dont do what I do, do what I tell you.
Two months ago when social services were under scrutiny for various alleged problems re social care for adults ,questions were asked and answers were expected, after all we are a democracy and have the right of freedom of speech or do we, for to this day I havnt seen answers to that problem and I even mentioned The Freedom of Information Act but was told that even under that Act certain information cannot be divulged.
All our public servants work for us, The Public,and there are rules to be followed and when rules are broken or bent then there is a statutory body to investigate the problems.
The only problem being that if a report is negative then it is suppressed as being not in the best public interest to publish it.
The point I make is.whatever we say nothing will change, it didnt at social services and it wont change in this Police scandle.
We can do away with the CRB checks as they seem to be dissregarded anyway.

Jimmy Paterson says...
5:15pm Wed 18 Feb 09

Anyone with any conviction(s) is not fit for the role as a police officer and should never be allowed to join or if convicted whilst in the job should be sacked (not allowed to resign as is often the case).
Unfortunately the Police's 21st century obsession with recruiting or retaining those from minority groups is tainting senior management judgement on who is actually fit for office of constable....

jingandjang says...
5:46pm Wed 18 Feb 09

Jimmy Paterson wrote:
Anyone with any conviction(s) is not fit for the role as a police officer and should never be allowed to join or if convicted whilst in the job should be sacked (not allowed to resign as is often the case). Unfortunately the Police's 21st century obsession with recruiting or retaining those from minority groups is tainting senior management judgement on who is actually fit for office of constable....
An interesting point from Jimmy re resignations.
Many is the case where Police officers of any rank that have been suspended from duty pending a trial for a criminal act have been allowed to resign or be medically discharged before the trial thus protecting their generous pension should they be found guilty.


mobile fly says...
6:41pm Wed 18 Feb 09

it very annoying regarding this has I've applyed for the police six times and I didn't even get an interview, then police are employed with a crimnal record and register with the BNP. This is one big joke to our Country.

mobile fly says...
6:42pm Wed 18 Feb 09

Well done to Lancashire Telegraph for bringing it to the public attention. Hope you can on with more of these artcile's.

Old Timer says...
8:50pm Wed 18 Feb 09

Hello, Hello, Hello, what 'ave we here... something old Dixon of Dock Green would not believe. But he was from the old days when a Bobby was part of the community and lived in the area so you knew all about his history and even his whereabouts.
Thanks LT. you are doing a fine job.

Old Timer says...
9:03pm Wed 18 Feb 09

"Did you go to school? I doubt it with the way you have constructed this comment."
The above reply from Mr Tickle of Darwen regarding what Matthew 987 wrote is so unfair. If it is genuine then Matthew has put over his point and that is what this site is all about. Sadly all cannot be to the standard you obviously think you are but like your educated self they are people with something to tell.

Whats the Matta says...
9:44pm Wed 18 Feb 09

Have you been in trouble with the police before Sir?

No, but 16 of your colleagues have.

Same Old Faces says...
12:05am Thu 19 Feb 09

Firstly, what a glorified news report or should I say 'exclusive' by Charlotte Bradshaw!!

Out of 3500+ only 12 of these officers had a conviction of some sort when they joined the job... this might have been anything up to 29 years ago if they are nearing the end of thier career!!

The police service is probably (and rightly) the most pro-active public body when it comes to dismissing staff who fall short of the expected standard. In 'every' profession there are respected, trustworthy people with spent convictions including solicitors, doctors, barristers and even our local newspaper reporters!! It is a fact of life but every now and then a junior reporter glorifies and mis-interprets information obtained so she gets her 'exclusive'!!

Ive stopped buying the LET years ago because of ridiculous reports like this.. thank god this site is still free to view otherwise I probably wouldnt bother at all!!!

Whats tomorrows 'exclusive' Caroline? "Five Lancashire Ambulance Drivers have speeding convitions"..

Barbara J says...
4:46am Thu 19 Feb 09

Poice officers should be held to high esteem. If they have commited a crime they must be held accountable. How on earth are the public to believe in them if they have issues. Okay, everyone can make a mistake thats a gimmee but you cannot expect the regular public to agree if they are held to dfferent standards. You muar have accountablility if the public are to trust you. NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW

mazzgomaz says...
11:42am Thu 19 Feb 09

Pandoras box. Why stop at the Police, Why not do a check on all the public services in this catchment area, spent convictions of course to be excluded,or maybe we would rather not know what caliber of people are administering our local services.
I say again, ask the questions, and eventually there might be some answers.

chorleypoop says...
2:56pm Sat 21 Feb 09

Anyone can make a mistake. Obviously if they had numerous convictions each then that would be a worry. People can make a mistake and learn from it. I'm not worried.


16 Lancashire Police officers have criminal records 16 Lancashire Police officers have criminal records

Most popular


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Local Businesses