January 24.
Peter Brooke, MP's glowing half-page article on the proposed
Government-organised lottery must not fool anyone in Scotland who is or
is not tempted to have a wee flutter on it (January 22).
I have a copy of the National Heritage's press release of December 17
and the prospect is not so glowing. During the worst recession in years
it is set to ''catch the imagination of the nation'' and use your cash
''to bring genuine lasting benefits''.
Reading on, it says ''twenty percent will go to a millennium fund''
which ''will be administered by a new millennium commission appointed by
the Queen'' in London, ''chaired by the secretary for National
Heritage''.
''Distinguished and disinterested commissioners will be appointed.''
No doubt the right people will be chosen and the right fee paid.
''Arts money will be distributed by the Arts Council of Great Britain
(in London) and the Arts Council of Northern Ireland.'' No mention of
Scotland. We'll get the already agreed percentage and be told to be
grateful (the English regions will say it is too much).
But best of all ''The distributors will work closely with . . .
English Heritage, the Countryside Commission, English Nature, the
Museums and Galleries Commission, the British Film Institute, and the
Crafts Council'' -- every single one of them based in London.
Aye, but there's mair. ''We are creating a new body, the National
Lottery Charities Board -- and intend to set up an Office of National
Lottery to act as a regulator.'' It's name will be Oflot.
What in summary is this ''imaginative'' scheme likely to bring? What
are these ''exciting opportunities''? That much I think is obvious. It
will create a nice range of jobs in London, funded by Joe Public, under
the impression that the money is to go to ''worthy causes'' when in fact
it will take even more money out of Scotland.
And the British Labour Party approves (of course) of it all.
Lionel Hawes,
50 Kingsacre Road,
Glasgow.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article