THE initial reaction to the second half results from British Petroleum
must be that under chief executive David Simon, it has a better chance
of emulating the quality rating of Shell than for many a year.
And now chairman Lord Ashburton has categorically ruled out a rights
issue -- a cloud that had been hovering on the horizon unsettlingly
long. So a round of applause for once.
The bald figures are inevitably complicated but the striking point is
that there has been a significant advance in the second half operating
level which contributed 80% of the total. And crucially rather than
bleeding to death, there was a cash inflow in the December quarter of
#135m which enabled BP to reduce debt. Put another way, there was a cash
outflow for the year of #607m or just over half the #1135m of 1991m.
The stated full year results show that after tax and #888m of
exceptional items there was a loss of #352m on the replacement cost
basis compared with the previous year's profit of #1035m. On the
historic cost computation which strips out the effect of oil price
fluctuations, there was a deterioration from the preceding year's
surplus of #415m into a #458m deficit.
That does look bad except that the first half had a loss of #717m
after BP took a charge of #919m to cover redundancy and reorganisation
costs. The picture has also been distorted thanks to the figures having
been accounted under the Financial Reporting Standard 3 which deals with
acquisitions and disposals.
Concentrating on the operating outcome, there was a near quadrupling
in profitability in the fourth quarter to #200m despite losses in
chemicals where BP is suffering like the rest of the industry from the
impact of severe overcapacity. But Mr Simon made it clear that he was
not going to be the leader in putting the problem to rights. The full
year divisional loss of #24m does however contain some #20m of
restructing costs
Oil exploration and production saw the full year total only marginally
softer at #1681m which is good going considering the reduced sales of
both oil and gas. BP felt the effect of both lower Alaskan output and
the impact of sales of producing assets such as Canada offset by
increased sales from Miller in the North Sea in the final few months.
That field also helped stabilise gas sales which had suffered earlier in
the year from reduced take-up by British Gas which was losing market
share to the independents.
Average Brent prices were 5% lower at $19.40 a barrel. However the
impact of sterling devaluation in the fourth quarter had a beneficial
#1.54 a barrel uplift to #12.09 which helped sterling margins.
Mr Simon is chary about the outlook for the oil price which is natural
given the perennial uncertainties at Opec as well as a global economy
expected to rise by 2% at best this year. But it is reassuring that he
is basing BP's strategy on a $18 real oil price rather than the euphoric
$25 of predecessor Bob Horton.
Refining and marketing margins came under increasing pressure because
of economic sloth, particularly in the UK and Europe which left overall
annual profits slimming from #779m to #394m. Paradoxically now that
Nutrition is up for sale its profits have almost doubled to #73m
reflecting reduced capital expenditure.
The denial of any rights intention may look slightly odd when one
looks at gearing of 99%. But that reflects sterling devaluation. Year
end debt in dollars was a little changed year on year at $15.3 billion,
in sterling there was a #2000m jump to #10.2 billion. The gearing
problem is that BP has not revalued its assets to current prices which
would presumably half the stated figure.
Debt will fall $1000m a year until 1995 fuelled by asset sales with up
to $2000m planned this year including some of the chemical activities.
There has been extreme concern that because of its financial pressures
the reduction in the capital expenditure programme to just $5000m this
year ($6100m) will sap the life blood of the future. But with a major
squeeze on costs and better technology there is the confidence that
daily output will be maintained at 500,000 barrels of oil equivalent
until the end of the century.
Some 14,000 employees have left of which just 3500 were through asset
sales. There are more job losses to come this year but at a much reduced
level and there was nothing specific in the air yesterday.
Although the quarterly dividend has been held at 2.1p to bring the
total for the year to 10.5p, there is little hope of anything above 8.4p
this year as any recovery in the payment will have to await BP achieving
greater financial stability and that appears to be annual income of
#2000m.
The shares responded by rising 11[1/2]p to 277[1/2]p where they yield
a running 4%. Support should harden as the debt burden falls away and
there are no more exceptional write-offs of substance.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article