MR Baggott's letter (November 28) on the subject of Nangreaves raised a number of questions about the council's actions. These require an answer.

Mount Pleasant (Nangreaves) has been a Conservation Area since 1974 and in addition a large number of the houses are individually protected by "listed building" status.

Also, as part of the planning permission when the mill was converted, the normal residential development rights of the new properties were removed. This means that, by law, any changes to these buildings which affect their character require permission from the council.

This is part of a national system designed to protect the country's heritage and it is implemented by every local planning authority. Incidentally, there is no opting-out and many of the residents will have moved into the area knowing that there are additional controls.

Mount Pleasant is very special in terms of its history and architecture and all the council is doing is applying the law to protect the area's heritage for future generations. Many people in the village apply for the necessary permission but some do not.

To approach the situation objectively, the council has undertaken a survey and a detailed appraisal of the area and has produced a list of proposals. Some of the proposals are about providing guidance for the residents and undertaking improvements. No "threats" have been issued. The latest letter sent to residents was to keep them informed of the decisions made at the planning control committee in November when the matter was considered.

The council has stated that where matters need to be resolved this will be done through discussion with residents. What the council cannot do is ignore the gradual erosion of the village's character through unlawful acts.

COUNCILLOR DOT CASSIDY