Potholes are the number one priority for Lancashire residents, according to county councillors.

That is the message elected representatives say they are getting whenever they talk to locals.

The revelation came at a meeting of Lancashire County Council’s scrutiny management board during a discussion about how the authority should spend the cash being sent its way from the savings made by scrapping the northern leg of the HS2 railway line to Manchester.

Board member Scott Cunliffe, the Green Party county councillor for the Burnley Central West division, said he had been canvassing opinion in his area regarding the public’s preferences for how the money should be used.

“Fill in the potholes, fill in the potholes’ – that’s all people say. So if we want to listen to residents and respond to [them], we’re not going to spend it on sustainable transport, which might be my preference – we’re going to go for the potholes first,” County Cllr Cunliffe added.

Lead member for highways and active transport Scott Smith said the sentiment was universally shared.

“It is the top priority [at] every door you knock on, every resident you speak to – that they want the potholes filled and the roads resurfaced,” the Conservative politician said.

Lancashire is in line for two tranches of redirected HS2 cash over the next decade as part of the government’s ‘Network North’ programme.

The county council area has been promised a £244.5m boost to its highways maintenance budget between 2023 and 2033.  The standalone authorities in Blackpool and Blackburn with Darwen are set to get an additional £12.7m and £20.4m, respectively, over the same period.

Separately, Lancashire as a whole is due to receive the largest share across the North and Midlands from the government’s Local Transport Fund (LTF) – which also comes under the Network North umbrella.   The county council has been told it will be given £494m between next year and 2032, with Blackpool getting £120.8m and Blackburn £116.9m.

The LTF is intended for major highways and transport schemes such as building new roads or upgrading railway stations, rather than repairing potholes.

But the scrutiny board heard the complexity of the different funding arrangements was not cutting through with residents, many of whom would happily see it all spent on resurfacing the roads.

County Cllr Cunliffe asked for more clarity over how Lancashire’s allocations were going to be spent in time for the next board meeting in June, adding:  “This is going to change the dynamic for highways, especially, and transport.”

But County Cllr Smith said he could not guarantee government guidance on suitable LTF projects would be available within that timeframe.

Just 24 hours later transport minister Huw Merriman told a Commons debate on the possibility of reopening Midge Hall station near Leyland that advice on LTF funding would be issued “shortly”.

A breakdown of how Lancashire County Council intends to spend its extra highways maintenance funding – of which £7.2m has so been allocated – has already been published.

As previously reported 22 schemes have been drawn up across nine districts – but none from that pot are planned for Burnley, Preston, or Chorley.

County Cllr Cunliffe said a resident had already contacted him to express their dismay at Burnley’s omission from the list.