FULL TIME: Middlesbrough 3 Burnley 2 (From Lancashire Telegraph)

Ouch that was a late one!!!

Gutted as we were worth a point by the end of that game. With a bit of luck, Eddie will have the money at the end of the season for a new keeper. Grant should have had their first goal. A very poor give away. Despite a decent defence, it may be the keeper that lets us down as Grant did. He looked poor in the warm up. When we felt we were on the ascendency it turned out to be a hump backed bridge. Eddie will sort it
Huddersfield will get the back lash.

Howe the lads

Only 2 comments against your own match report ! too busy commenting on the Rovers stories probably. It must be agony for you, jealousy is a terrible thing and I can only imagine what it must be like to go through your whole sad lives being a very poor second to Rovers.

Look everyone - it's Cour de Racist again, can't help but continue his obsession with all things Burnley FC.

Listen sonny, if you are stuck for something to do this evening, now that you are *ahem* protesting this season - why don't you knock on your sister's cave door and see if she wants to play Doctors and nurses with you - again.

no ney never wrote:
Gutted as we were worth a point by the end of that game. With a bit of luck, Eddie will have the money at the end of the season for a new keeper. Grant should have had their first goal. A very poor give away. Despite a decent defence, it may be the keeper that lets us down as Grant did. He looked poor in the warm up. When we felt we were on the ascendency it turned out to be a hump backed bridge. Eddie will sort it Huddersfield will get the back lash. Howe the lads

Don't talk b0ll0cks man, the first goal took a deflection, Grant not to blame for any of the goals.

Coeur de Lion wrote:
Only 2 comments against your own match report ! too busy commenting on the Rovers stories probably. It must be agony for you, jealousy is a terrible thing and I can only imagine what it must be like to go through your whole sad lives being a very poor second to Rovers.

Go to Claretsmad and read any of the 2 million posts! We have our own website and don't really need to rely on the LET!!

Seem to remember us getting beat there 2 seasons ago by a couple of unstoppable wonder strikes, after taking the lead?

caballo wrote:

no ney never wrote:
Gutted as we were worth a point by the end of that game. With a bit of luck, Eddie will have the money at the end of the season for a new keeper. Grant should have had their first goal. A very poor give away. Despite a decent defence, it may be the keeper that lets us down as Grant did. He looked poor in the warm up. When we felt we were on the ascendency it turned out to be a hump backed bridge. Eddie will sort it Huddersfield will get the back lash. Howe the lads

Don't talk b0ll0cks man, the first goal took a deflection, Grant not to blame for any of the goals.

I agree, he doesn't know what the f*** he's talking about.

midas wrote:

Coeur de Lion wrote:
Only 2 comments against your own match report ! too busy commenting on the Rovers stories probably. It must be agony for you, jealousy is a terrible thing and I can only imagine what it must be like to go through your whole sad lives being a very poor second to Rovers.

Go to Claretsmad and read any of the 2 million posts! We have our own website and don't really need to rely on the LET!!

WTF are you doing here then ?

Harwoodstblue wrote:

caballo wrote:

no ney never wrote:
Gutted as we were worth a point by the end of that game. With a bit of luck, Eddie will have the money at the end of the season for a new keeper. Grant should have had their first goal. A very poor give away. Despite a decent defence, it may be the keeper that lets us down as Grant did. He looked poor in the warm up. When we felt we were on the ascendency it turned out to be a hump backed bridge. Eddie will sort it Huddersfield will get the back lash. Howe the lads

Don't talk b0ll0cks man, the first goal took a deflection, Grant not to blame for any of the goals.

I agree, he doesn't know what the f*** he's talking about.

Didn't you know that you can open two different windows on the internet - and even more than that, if you want.
It means you can be on more than one site at once.
For example, a great one (like claretsmad) and a crappy one (like here). It's a great way to really understand the difference between good stuff - and crap stuff.

davidinburnley wrote:

Harwoodstblue wrote:

caballo wrote:

no ney never wrote:
Gutted as we were worth a point by the end of that game. With a bit of luck, Eddie will have the money at the end of the season for a new keeper. Grant should have had their first goal. A very poor give away. Despite a decent defence, it may be the keeper that lets us down as Grant did. He looked poor in the warm up. When we felt we were on the ascendency it turned out to be a hump backed bridge. Eddie will sort it Huddersfield will get the back lash. Howe the lads

Don't talk b0ll0cks man, the first goal took a deflection, Grant not to blame for any of the goals.

I agree, he doesn't know what the f*** he's talking about.

Didn't you know that you can open two different windows on the internet - and even more than that, if you want.
It means you can be on more than one site at once.
For example, a great one (like claretsmad) and a crappy one (like here). It's a great way to really understand the difference between good stuff - and crap stuff.

Hi David............Tha
t puts us above you then.