When news happens, text LT and your photos and videos to 80360. Or contact us by email or phone.
9:22pm Saturday 12th November 2011 in Football
Exclusive By Andy Cryer, Blackburn Rovers reporter
A QATAR oil giant could be set to launch a shock takeover bid for Blackburn Rovers.
The Lancashire Telegraph understand the company is preparing to offer £25m for the club to under fire owners Venky's as well as taking on and clearing the club's debt.
Rovers are not the only Premier League club they are looking at, although they are understood to have already been put off moving for Everton due to the cost involved in building a new stadium.
Venky's were unavailable for comment today and it is not yet known whether Rovers' Indian owners would be prepared to sell.
In the past, Venky's have vehemently denied suggestions they were looking to sell the club they bought 12 months ago next week.
They have suffered a tough introduction to life as a football club owner, with Rovers fans disappointed and concerned about the club's current position.
The company, who do not want to be named at this stage, would want a quick resolution to their move in order to implement the changes they feel are needed for the club to thrive in the Premier League.
The prospect of buying a Premier League club has become attractive to them after Qatar was awarded the 2022 World Cup.
Rovers are not the only Premier League club they are interested in buying and have not even been told that Venky's would consider selling the club.
It is believed they even showed some interest in buying Manchester United.
Comments(140)
trampus
says...
9:35pm Sat 12 Nov 11
Vinjay
says...
9:35pm Sat 12 Nov 11
YorkshireBlue
says...
9:38pm Sat 12 Nov 11
Vinjay
says...
9:38pm Sat 12 Nov 11
trampus wrote:Cryer knows Nixon is planning to break a takeover story later tonight and probably wanted to beat him to it. He admitted on twitter he does not have any idea if anyone is buying the club.
More gossip......tell us something real for a change!
tombo1984
says...
9:43pm Sat 12 Nov 11
alfa111
says...
9:46pm Sat 12 Nov 11
YorkshireBlue wrote:so will20,000 others buddy
Please be true. Having a party when Baldy gets sacked....
lobby
says...
9:49pm Sat 12 Nov 11
Dr.alan79
says...
9:50pm Sat 12 Nov 11
Vinjay wrote:No he didn't at all. He said he has no idea if Venky's would sell.
trampus wrote:Cryer knows Nixon is planning to break a takeover story later tonight and probably wanted to beat him to it. He admitted on twitter he does not have any idea if anyone is buying the club.
More gossip......tell us something real for a change!
Vinjay
says...
9:52pm Sat 12 Nov 11
Vinjay
says...
9:53pm Sat 12 Nov 11
Stavka-rovers
says...
10:00pm Sat 12 Nov 11
Vinjay
says...
10:15pm Sat 12 Nov 11
Only1Garner
says...
10:15pm Sat 12 Nov 11
ossyrover1
says...
10:17pm Sat 12 Nov 11
Shorty Medlocke
says...
10:22pm Sat 12 Nov 11
Keep Darwen Green
says...
10:27pm Sat 12 Nov 11
adcr
says...
10:28pm Sat 12 Nov 11
petergray
says...
10:29pm Sat 12 Nov 11
Keep Darwen Green
says...
10:32pm Sat 12 Nov 11
petergray
says...
10:34pm Sat 12 Nov 11
petergray
says...
10:36pm Sat 12 Nov 11
Dr.alan79
says...
10:36pm Sat 12 Nov 11
Keep Darwen Green wrote:You're not kidding! I think the wine cellar needs replenishing, I was a very casual drinker 12 months ago. I may be calling AA soon.
Considering the last takeover took 6 months to complete that should take us to the end of the season with mr. Pilkington still at the helm. Buckle up chucks its going to be a bumpy ride
Dukes
says...
10:45pm Sat 12 Nov 11
adcr
says...
10:48pm Sat 12 Nov 11
Keep Darwen Green wrote:the venky's might be stubborn, but all we are to them is an investment. if they see their investment going bad and they can get their money back and perhaps make a small profit, who knows they might just sell.
Oh and for what its worth my prediction is Venky's won't sell, but then again, I'm always wrong aren't I boys. In my eyes they took on a five year plan and its just twelve months in so I reckon, unless they are offered seriously stupid money, they will still be our owners in twelve months.
granty
says...
10:57pm Sat 12 Nov 11
petergray
says...
11:12pm Sat 12 Nov 11
petergray
says...
11:15pm Sat 12 Nov 11
eddie the eagle
says...
12:27am Sun 13 Nov 11
bluerob
says...
12:41am Sun 13 Nov 11
Vinjay
says...
12:52am Sun 13 Nov 11
tombo1984
says...
1:33am Sun 13 Nov 11
granty
says...
1:37am Sun 13 Nov 11
Roverthere
says...
3:57am Sun 13 Nov 11
JPB
says...
5:54am Sun 13 Nov 11
JPB
says...
5:55am Sun 13 Nov 11
in moses we trust
says...
7:54am Sun 13 Nov 11
J.C - Rishton
says...
7:56am Sun 13 Nov 11
Keep Darwen Green wrote:You know I don't like to agree with you but in this case I do - I think Venkies will not sell unless they were to receive a huge profit on their investment - otherwise they do have their own (secretive) plan and they'll stick with it.
Oh and for what its worth my prediction is Venky's won't sell, but then again, I'm always wrong aren't I boys. In my eyes they took on a five year plan and its just twelve months in so I reckon, unless they are offered seriously stupid money, they will still be our owners in twelve months.
Sherwoodforest
says...
8:20am Sun 13 Nov 11
J.C - Rishton
says...
8:24am Sun 13 Nov 11
in moses we trust wrote:Moses, yes you are right - but then again we are drowning so who wouldnt be grasping at any straws - let alone one that might pump £500m into player purchases.
Clutching at very short straws the lot of you,face it your doomed.
J.C - Rishton
says...
8:29am Sun 13 Nov 11
Sherwoodforest wrote:They don't want to build a stadium, they just want to get into improving the playing side without having to wait by getting the infrastructure in place first.
Hmmm,
Why would they not want to build a new stadium if they are so rich?
Could well be tomsh1ttery, hopefully not
VENKYS OUT
J.C - Rishton
says...
8:29am Sun 13 Nov 11
Sherwoodforest wrote:They don't want to build a stadium, they just want to get into improving the playing side without having to wait by getting the infrastructure in place first.
Hmmm,
Why would they not want to build a new stadium if they are so rich?
Could well be tomsh1ttery, hopefully not
VENKYS OUT
Gaz M
says...
8:51am Sun 13 Nov 11
J.C - Rishton
says...
8:51am Sun 13 Nov 11
J.C - Rishton
says...
8:55am Sun 13 Nov 11
Gaz M wrote:Gaz - I can't believe what you have written.
you are quite right stavka and look where Portsmouth are now!.Hope this does not scupper any transfer monies that Venkys might be concidering spending in january ?
stick to football
says...
9:03am Sun 13 Nov 11
Suffolk n Watt
says...
9:16am Sun 13 Nov 11
saint.george
says...
9:26am Sun 13 Nov 11
Gaz M
says...
9:40am Sun 13 Nov 11
rovertilldie
says...
9:47am Sun 13 Nov 11
cboyer
says...
10:24am Sun 13 Nov 11
bburnrover
says...
11:14am Sun 13 Nov 11
Justjes
says...
11:17am Sun 13 Nov 11
Smacx25
says...
11:31am Sun 13 Nov 11
J.C - Rishton
says...
11:48am Sun 13 Nov 11
Suffolk n Watt wrote:I am sorry but are you saying we should stick with Venkys over the Qatar Royal family cos if they pumped millions of £s into us and we qualified from the champions league then we would be barred from entering the competition ?.
There are a few big problems that some people are not taking into account.
If they were taken over by the oil barons on the basis that they want to transform the club into a Champions League team, they can't splash out these massive amounts of money on players and wages as FIFA's new financial play laws started this season.
They would be barred from entering the Champions League and Europa Cup.
This is why Venkys have signed young inexperienced players on low wages just to stand a slight chance of getting into Europe.
Rovers have a relatively new ground and the capacity is about right as new fans are hard to find whilst money is tight.
Prices will have to go up in the near future just to get the wages to turnover ratio down,and then most fans will not pay the extra ticket price.
Like it or not Rovers will become a selling club with no prospects in the next 20 years of ever challenging for honours unless 200,000 new homes are built in the area and thats just not going to happen.
The only thing they can do is try and keep the club within the top ten and thats about the best any rovers fan can hope for.
As much as it pains me i'm a lifelong Rovers fan, so effectively we are stuck with Venkys but we don't have to be stuck with Kean.
J.C - Rishton
says...
11:51am Sun 13 Nov 11
Gaz M wrote:Ok fair enough, sorry I didnt get your point originally and I usually think you talk a lot of sense
J C The point i was trying to make was that if at all this story is all b****ks and just scaremongering it might be just the excuse Venkys need for them not to spend in January .If there is any substance to the story i would welcome the new owners with open arms as i do believe that Venkys are slowly destroying our club.
nontetleydrinker
says...
11:55am Sun 13 Nov 11
ossyrover1
says...
12:04pm Sun 13 Nov 11
nontetleydrinker wrote:even that would be better than venky's, dingle.
Also in the running to buy trampwood park is, Honest finbar The gypsy rag 'n' bone man, He is a typical blackburner and has offered £500 to take over the helm, Well i would certainly trust finbar over venkys....
Road Runner Road Runner
says...
12:17pm Sun 13 Nov 11
Sherwoodforest
says...
12:23pm Sun 13 Nov 11
manyarecalled
says...
1:04pm Sun 13 Nov 11
adcr
says...
1:05pm Sun 13 Nov 11
ossyrover1
says...
1:25pm Sun 13 Nov 11
J.C - Rishton
says...
1:28pm Sun 13 Nov 11
adcr wrote:You are right of course that its all a rumour put about by a newspaper - and not a particular reliable one at that.
i'm not getting too excited about this yet. the people newspaper broke the story (not the most reliable news agency). nobody else i.e. sky, the bbc, and other newspapers have mentioned this yet (apart from the mirror, who is the people's sister paper). either its very early days and the other news agencies are waiting on something concrete before they publish the story. or its just another rumour about another consortium looking to bid for a premiership club.
A Game of Blue & White Halves
says...
1:32pm Sun 13 Nov 11
rovertilldie wrote:Geography not your strongest subject, I see.
1.hopefully this is true 2.get a new manager 3.saudi owners wil spend money 4.hopefully move up table
Keep Darwen Green
says...
1:46pm Sun 13 Nov 11
adcr
says...
1:48pm Sun 13 Nov 11
J.C - Rishton wrote:yes, it is potentially very exciting (if true). but, i thought that it was illegal to own two football clubs at the same time. as this is a conflict of interest. i know this is definately true for teams in the premier league. but i also thought it would apply in europe. i mean what if rovers met psg in the european cup. there i go getting carried away again. lol
adcr wrote:You are right of course that its all a rumour put about by a newspaper - and not a particular reliable one at that.
i'm not getting too excited about this yet. the people newspaper broke the story (not the most reliable news agency). nobody else i.e. sky, the bbc, and other newspapers have mentioned this yet (apart from the mirror, who is the people's sister paper). either its very early days and the other news agencies are waiting on something concrete before they publish the story. or its just another rumour about another consortium looking to bid for a premiership club.
.
You are also right when you say we should wait and see before getting too excited - but in truth its hard not to get excited - not only do we have a chance to get rid of those bungaling buffoons from India but our prospective new owners have genuine wealth - wealth that can match any other football owner anywhere in the world.
.
What IS fact though is that these people have already bought PSG and pumped millions into them and it is also fact they have been talking to Everton about buying them out and that they have been unhappy at the figures that Bill Kenright is talking about (£120m to buy Everton, clear the debt, approx £70-£80m and build a new ground - £200m ??). This is one reason that Everton fans recently marched in protest against Kenwright because they see him as pricing out, what would be a fantastic potential buyer for their club.
.
It is also well known that this family wants to own an English Premier League club and have been looking for one to buy for a couple of years now - if it dosent turn out to be Everton or Blackburn it will be one lucky club sooner or later.
adcr
says...
2:00pm Sun 13 Nov 11
Keep Darwen Green wrote:kdg, your right about being respectful and staying calm, until something concrete happens. but i am still going to allow myself a little bit of excitement. because not many teams are lucky enough to find that in their darkest hour a white knight might ride in and save the day. don't forget without hope everything is lost.
Just as I feared, a lot of posters and people are already on cloud cuckoo land. You need to step back and calm down. All this talk of Qatar has started rocks clanging in heads. Don't get me wrong, I think that everyone wants to see an improvement in our status. But on this occasion and for once in his life Moses is correct and there is a lot of straw clutching going on. If Venky's don't want to sell they will still be our owners and some of the vile comments that have been written on here already just shows the head space some of our supporters live in.
What if they don't sell, what if they want to stay, what if all the rainbow chasers amongst you are blinded by the pound signs and the money never materialises. Its only more likely to wind you up even more.
So for me, if it happens it happens but for now Venky's are the owners and I won't sink so low as to call them pathetic names. Grow some and don't peddle your sewage in public.
Fartonadingleshead
says...
2:01pm Sun 13 Nov 11
FARAWAYROVER
says...
2:05pm Sun 13 Nov 11
FARAWAYROVER
says...
2:06pm Sun 13 Nov 11
eddie the eagle
says...
2:07pm Sun 13 Nov 11
FARAWAYROVER
says...
2:08pm Sun 13 Nov 11
Stone Island
says...
2:19pm Sun 13 Nov 11
Vinjay wrote:Maybe this could be liberation day, eh Vinjay?
I know what its like to get excited about takeover stories only to see them come to nothing. So this does not quite get the pulse racing yet but we will all be praying deep down it is Rovers they want.
The main question even if they are is still would venkys sell as Cryer points out. At the moment oil barons or not fans will see anyone as better than venkys. Maybe or maybe not but the gamble has to be taken. If these people are the front runners the word gamble does not come into it.
We should be hearing more about this from nixon later tonight.
Stone Island
says...
2:21pm Sun 13 Nov 11
FARAWAYROVER wrote:Why can it not happen?
Anyone who believes anything that andy cryer writes or believes one shred of the qatar takeover story musy be as deluded as baldy b*****d.Lots of us want baldy out and venkys but it ain't gonna happen.I've boycotted the last 2 games and they'll only only take notice if we hit them in the pocket
Stone Island
says...
2:44pm Sun 13 Nov 11
Keep Darwen Green
says...
3:00pm Sun 13 Nov 11
Stone Island wrote:Rainbow chaser
COWBOYS from India OUT! Arabs IN!
Stone Island
says...
3:04pm Sun 13 Nov 11
Keep Darwen Green wrote:Absolutely!
Stone Island wrote:Rainbow chaser
COWBOYS from India OUT! Arabs IN!
RoversLoyal
says...
3:21pm Sun 13 Nov 11
J.C - Rishton wrote:The Darwen Hag would love this story to be false, you can just sense it in the tone of her post - another arrogant contribution from a Kean/Venky lickspittle.
Keep Darwen Green wrote:You know I don't like to agree with you but in this case I do - I think Venkies will not sell unless they were to receive a huge profit on their investment - otherwise they do have their own (secretive) plan and they'll stick with it.
Oh and for what its worth my prediction is Venky's won't sell, but then again, I'm always wrong aren't I boys. In my eyes they took on a five year plan and its just twelve months in so I reckon, unless they are offered seriously stupid money, they will still be our owners in twelve months.
.
But this will just show how little they actually care about the club - preventing someone who would be hugely beneficial and could transform us back to previous glories, just for their own petty, selfish motives.
.
If they turn down this sale then don't seriously invest in the club themselves then ALL Rovers fans must never forget and never forgive them.
RoversLoyal
says...
3:25pm Sun 13 Nov 11
adcr wrote:Yes KDG - you are tight about being "calm" and "respectful" - so why not try fcuking doing it?
Keep Darwen Green wrote:kdg, your right about being respectful and staying calm, until something concrete happens. but i am still going to allow myself a little bit of excitement. because not many teams are lucky enough to find that in their darkest hour a white knight might ride in and save the day. don't forget without hope everything is lost.
Just as I feared, a lot of posters and people are already on cloud cuckoo land. You need to step back and calm down. All this talk of Qatar has started rocks clanging in heads. Don't get me wrong, I think that everyone wants to see an improvement in our status. But on this occasion and for once in his life Moses is correct and there is a lot of straw clutching going on. If Venky's don't want to sell they will still be our owners and some of the vile comments that have been written on here already just shows the head space some of our supporters live in.
What if they don't sell, what if they want to stay, what if all the rainbow chasers amongst you are blinded by the pound signs and the money never materialises. Its only more likely to wind you up even more.
So for me, if it happens it happens but for now Venky's are the owners and I won't sink so low as to call them pathetic names. Grow some and don't peddle your sewage in public.
Stone Island
says...
3:27pm Sun 13 Nov 11
paladin101
says...
3:50pm Sun 13 Nov 11
Rover Pete
says...
3:53pm Sun 13 Nov 11
Vinjay
says...
4:57pm Sun 13 Nov 11
insiderbb
says...
5:22pm Sun 13 Nov 11
Arthur Labore
says...
5:40pm Sun 13 Nov 11
dancav
says...
6:23pm Sun 13 Nov 11
ossyrover1
says...
6:23pm Sun 13 Nov 11
ossyrover1 wrote:as i said earlier, the slumdogs dont want to sell. deal off.
apparantly venky's have said NO SALE
Baldly goes
says...
6:38pm Sun 13 Nov 11
Smacx25 wrote:I think the LT has been very balanced . I also think the protestors are in a minority
If this happens it will be a major embarrament for Lancashire Telegraph. You have snubbed the fans protests and backed Venkys and Kean up to the hilt. We will not forget that you should have been a voice for the Rovers fans. The very people who buy and keep your paper going.
Russ ov the rovers
says...
6:46pm Sun 13 Nov 11
Baldly goes wrote:Shut up tit
Smacx25 wrote: If this happens it will be a major embarrament for Lancashire Telegraph. You have snubbed the fans protests and backed Venkys and Kean up to the hilt. We will not forget that you should have been a voice for the Rovers fans. The very people who buy and keep your paper going.I think the LT has been very balanced . I also think the protestors are in a minority
Suffolk n Watt
says...
6:50pm Sun 13 Nov 11
J.C - Rishton wrote:This is why Man City are trying to wipe out their overspending with a 10year £400 million pound sponsorship,which has been pointed out that it's an inflated deal just to overcome their spending woes.
Suffolk n Watt wrote:I am sorry but are you saying we should stick with Venkys over the Qatar Royal family cos if they pumped millions of £s into us and we qualified from the champions league then we would be barred from entering the competition ?.
There are a few big problems that some people are not taking into account.
If they were taken over by the oil barons on the basis that they want to transform the club into a Champions League team, they can't splash out these massive amounts of money on players and wages as FIFA's new financial play laws started this season.
They would be barred from entering the Champions League and Europa Cup.
This is why Venkys have signed young inexperienced players on low wages just to stand a slight chance of getting into Europe.
Rovers have a relatively new ground and the capacity is about right as new fans are hard to find whilst money is tight.
Prices will have to go up in the near future just to get the wages to turnover ratio down,and then most fans will not pay the extra ticket price.
Like it or not Rovers will become a selling club with no prospects in the next 20 years of ever challenging for honours unless 200,000 new homes are built in the area and thats just not going to happen.
The only thing they can do is try and keep the club within the top ten and thats about the best any rovers fan can hope for.
As much as it pains me i'm a lifelong Rovers fan, so effectively we are stuck with Venkys but we don't have to be stuck with Kean.
.
That is completely illogical - I would rather finish 4th in the EPL and NOT allowed to play in Europe than finish 16th in the EPL and not qualify for Europe anyway.
.
Also Sir Alex said recently that he didnt believe that these "financial restrictions or club barings" from the Champions league would happen -and I agree with him.
.
At the moment - City and Chelsea, prob Man U, AC Milan and Barcelona would all not qualify - can you honestly see these clubs being bared from the competition ?? - it will never happen because the TV companies simply would not allow it
adcr
says...
6:52pm Sun 13 Nov 11
dancav wrote:maybe the venkys are trying to bump up the price.
Just been on Granada news that Venkys have dismissed claims and are not willing to sell.
J.C - Rishton
says...
7:30pm Sun 13 Nov 11
Suffolk n Watt wrote:I understand where you are coming from but like Sir Alex - I don't agree with you, when push comes to shove no club will be excluded, a deal will be done with FIFA and these new measures will be postponed or clubs will simply get round it by the owners putting in the investment under the guise of "sponsership" - the sponsers and TV companies want the best, not necessarily the best run and, as the saying goes "he who pays the piper, calles the tune".
J.C - Rishton wrote:This is why Man City are trying to wipe out their overspending with a 10year £400 million pound sponsorship,which has been pointed out that it's an inflated deal just to overcome their spending woes.
Suffolk n Watt wrote:I am sorry but are you saying we should stick with Venkys over the Qatar Royal family cos if they pumped millions of £s into us and we qualified from the champions league then we would be barred from entering the competition ?.
There are a few big problems that some people are not taking into account.
If they were taken over by the oil barons on the basis that they want to transform the club into a Champions League team, they can't splash out these massive amounts of money on players and wages as FIFA's new financial play laws started this season.
They would be barred from entering the Champions League and Europa Cup.
This is why Venkys have signed young inexperienced players on low wages just to stand a slight chance of getting into Europe.
Rovers have a relatively new ground and the capacity is about right as new fans are hard to find whilst money is tight.
Prices will have to go up in the near future just to get the wages to turnover ratio down,and then most fans will not pay the extra ticket price.
Like it or not Rovers will become a selling club with no prospects in the next 20 years of ever challenging for honours unless 200,000 new homes are built in the area and thats just not going to happen.
The only thing they can do is try and keep the club within the top ten and thats about the best any rovers fan can hope for.
As much as it pains me i'm a lifelong Rovers fan, so effectively we are stuck with Venkys but we don't have to be stuck with Kean.
.
That is completely illogical - I would rather finish 4th in the EPL and NOT allowed to play in Europe than finish 16th in the EPL and not qualify for Europe anyway.
.
Also Sir Alex said recently that he didnt believe that these "financial restrictions or club barings" from the Champions league would happen -and I agree with him.
.
At the moment - City and Chelsea, prob Man U, AC Milan and Barcelona would all not qualify - can you honestly see these clubs being bared from the competition ?? - it will never happen because the TV companies simply would not allow it
No oil baron would want to put in massive amounts of money unless they got a champions league spot as where would they make any money from.
Utd have been under the wages to turnover ratio for years and would qualify,Chelsea spent a massive amount the year before and will not spend anywhere near what they have done in the last few years anymore.
Barcelona are just on the cusp of qualifying as Cesc Fabregas had to take a pay cut just to join them.
Its a catch 22 situation that will only make the big clubs even bigger.
It will be 3 years before the barring starts so many will be trying to get their house in order.
ChrisSutton
says...
7:44pm Sun 13 Nov 11
ossyrover1 wrote:There's a lot of hearsay on this potential bid and a LOT of people claiming to be 'in the know'. We need to keep some healthy scepticism in mind.
ossyrover1 wrote:as i said earlier, the slumdogs dont want to sell. deal off.
apparantly venky's have said NO SALE
stick to football
says...
9:05pm Sun 13 Nov 11
Keep Darwen Green
says...
9:08pm Sun 13 Nov 11
RoversLoyal wrote:Is that your take on the subject? I would have preferred an opinion like stone islands or adcr, at least they have one, instead of your usual stalking, do you have an opinion on anything but what I post? Why do you wait until I post and then jump on it like some deranged nutter from broadmoore? Are you Ian Huntley with computer time? probably frothing at the mouth yanking the end off it waiting for the taser squad to arrive.
J.C - Rishton wrote:The Darwen Hag would love this story to be false, you can just sense it in the tone of her post - another arrogant contribution from a Kean/Venky lickspittle.
Keep Darwen Green wrote:You know I don't like to agree with you but in this case I do - I think Venkies will not sell unless they were to receive a huge profit on their investment - otherwise they do have their own (secretive) plan and they'll stick with it.
Oh and for what its worth my prediction is Venky's won't sell, but then again, I'm always wrong aren't I boys. In my eyes they took on a five year plan and its just twelve months in so I reckon, unless they are offered seriously stupid money, they will still be our owners in twelve months.
.
But this will just show how little they actually care about the club - preventing someone who would be hugely beneficial and could transform us back to previous glories, just for their own petty, selfish motives.
.
If they turn down this sale then don't seriously invest in the club themselves then ALL Rovers fans must never forget and never forgive them.
Livesey rover
says...
9:31pm Sun 13 Nov 11
high viz jacket man
says...
9:35pm Sun 13 Nov 11
high viz jacket man
says...
9:36pm Sun 13 Nov 11
Only1Garner
says...
9:43pm Sun 13 Nov 11
J.C - Rishton
says...
9:51pm Sun 13 Nov 11
ChrisSutton wrote:Chris - Unfortunatley I don't think these arabs operate by saying "I like it - I'm having it at any price" - everyone who deals with them knows they have pots of money but if they are made to pay over the odds then they just walk away - this was evident when the Dubai royals were looking at Liverpool - overall buyout/setup costs (similar to the Everton problem now).
ossyrover1 wrote:There's a lot of hearsay on this potential bid and a LOT of people claiming to be 'in the know'. We need to keep some healthy scepticism in mind.
ossyrover1 wrote:as i said earlier, the slumdogs dont want to sell. deal off.
apparantly venky's have said NO SALE
If a Qatar billionaire was seriously interested in buying a Premier League club, and wanted a club already with the infrastructure available, for sure, Rovers would be a sensible purchase.
Considering they'd have to pump in around £300-400 million to Everton for a new stadium, then raising their bid for Rovers by 20 or so million is absolute peanuts considering.
My point is: if they truly wanted Rovers/a PL club, they'd make a higher bid to Venkys.
People who claim to be in the know, may know some info, but they can never know the whole story. If this Qatar billionaire wanted to force Venkys to sell he could quite easily double his opening bid (again, peanuts compared to the cash outlay required at Everton). If they don't re-bid, then I question how serious THEY are about buying a PL club.
Will be interesting to see how this pans out. If the whole story becomes available that Venkys truly blocked a buy out from a billionaire, will Rovers fans ever forgive Venkys?
We'll be left in the Championship thinking what might have been.
-D.K.O
ChrisSutton
says...
10:25pm Sun 13 Nov 11
J.C - Rishton wrote:True. Although I would say that even if Venkys demanded more money our price would still be a world away from what it'd cost to buy Liverpool. But that last scenario you outlined really would be a win win for everyone:
ChrisSutton wrote:Chris - Unfortunatley I don't think these arabs operate by saying "I like it - I'm having it at any price" - everyone who deals with them knows they have pots of money but if they are made to pay over the odds then they just walk away - this was evident when the Dubai royals were looking at Liverpool - overall buyout/setup costs (similar to the Everton problem now).
ossyrover1 wrote:There's a lot of hearsay on this potential bid and a LOT of people claiming to be 'in the know'. We need to keep some healthy scepticism in mind.
ossyrover1 wrote:as i said earlier, the slumdogs dont want to sell. deal off.
apparantly venky's have said NO SALE
If a Qatar billionaire was seriously interested in buying a Premier League club, and wanted a club already with the infrastructure available, for sure, Rovers would be a sensible purchase.
Considering they'd have to pump in around £300-400 million to Everton for a new stadium, then raising their bid for Rovers by 20 or so million is absolute peanuts considering.
My point is: if they truly wanted Rovers/a PL club, they'd make a higher bid to Venkys.
People who claim to be in the know, may know some info, but they can never know the whole story. If this Qatar billionaire wanted to force Venkys to sell he could quite easily double his opening bid (again, peanuts compared to the cash outlay required at Everton). If they don't re-bid, then I question how serious THEY are about buying a PL club.
Will be interesting to see how this pans out. If the whole story becomes available that Venkys truly blocked a buy out from a billionaire, will Rovers fans ever forgive Venkys?
We'll be left in the Championship thinking what might have been.
-D.K.O
.
I don't think Venkys will sell because they are set on this "Rovers in India" theme. I think the only chance we have is if they sell a majority share to the Qataris and keep a minority holding and so the can still have a Rovers academy in Pune, still have the Rovers shops and still get Rovers over for games - this isnt that outlandish as when the Quatris recently bought PSG they only bought 70% of the club - the previous owners retained 30% share in the club.
Bazzer
says...
10:33pm Sun 13 Nov 11
Vinjay wrote:Is that the gratitude you show to your "liberators"?
EVIL If there's any justice Kean, Anderson and Venkys will pay for this. Rot in hell all of them.
alfa111
says...
10:36pm Sun 13 Nov 11
Keep Darwen Green
says...
10:41pm Sun 13 Nov 11
J.C - Rishton wrote:That was my take on the best way forward as well, Let them buy a controlling share in the club as long term Venky's idea may pay handsomely whereas the Qatariis may want to bale as soon as the world cup is out of the way. They can't exactly expand the fan base in a country that has no football at all. People are just seeing the pound signs and not looking at longevity. At least the Venky's have a long term plan
ChrisSutton wrote:Chris - Unfortunatley I don't think these arabs operate by saying "I like it - I'm having it at any price" - everyone who deals with them knows they have pots of money but if they are made to pay over the odds then they just walk away - this was evident when the Dubai royals were looking at Liverpool - overall buyout/setup costs (similar to the Everton problem now).
ossyrover1 wrote:There's a lot of hearsay on this potential bid and a LOT of people claiming to be 'in the know'. We need to keep some healthy scepticism in mind.
ossyrover1 wrote:as i said earlier, the slumdogs dont want to sell. deal off.
apparantly venky's have said NO SALE
If a Qatar billionaire was seriously interested in buying a Premier League club, and wanted a club already with the infrastructure available, for sure, Rovers would be a sensible purchase.
Considering they'd have to pump in around £300-400 million to Everton for a new stadium, then raising their bid for Rovers by 20 or so million is absolute peanuts considering.
My point is: if they truly wanted Rovers/a PL club, they'd make a higher bid to Venkys.
People who claim to be in the know, may know some info, but they can never know the whole story. If this Qatar billionaire wanted to force Venkys to sell he could quite easily double his opening bid (again, peanuts compared to the cash outlay required at Everton). If they don't re-bid, then I question how serious THEY are about buying a PL club.
Will be interesting to see how this pans out. If the whole story becomes available that Venkys truly blocked a buy out from a billionaire, will Rovers fans ever forgive Venkys?
We'll be left in the Championship thinking what might have been.
-D.K.O
.
I don't think Venkys will sell because they are set on this "Rovers in India" theme. I think the only chance we have is if they sell a majority share to the Qataris and keep a minority holding and so the can still have a Rovers academy in Pune, still have the Rovers shops and still get Rovers over for games - this isnt that outlandish as when the Quatris recently bought PSG they only bought 70% of the club - the previous owners retained 30% share in the club.
ChrisSutton
says...
10:47pm Sun 13 Nov 11
alfa111 wrote:I had that exact thought too.
venkys could use this situation to there advantage, as some may already bethinking its just a set up for venkys to show rovers fans that they do mean what they say there shoulder to shoulder with BRFC and fans and will not sell, that they are commited to the succsess of BRFC,dont pan me one on the head yet,its just a thought though.
alfa111
says...
11:49pm Sun 13 Nov 11
ChrisSutton wrote:Yep thats true cant see themletting go.
alfa111 wrote: venkys could use this situation to there advantage, as some may already bethinking its just a set up for venkys to show rovers fans that they do mean what they say there shoulder to shoulder with BRFC and fans and will not sell, that they are commited to the succsess of BRFC,dont pan me one on the head yet,its just a thought though.I had that exact thought too. But then I looked at our current situation and the mess we're in, and I looked at the fact they said Steve Kean is a "brilliant manager" and continue to back him to the hilt, and then I realise... they ain't that smart. -D.K.O
Rishtonian
says...
12:24am Mon 14 Nov 11
Rishtonian
says...
12:25am Mon 14 Nov 11
Rishtonian
says...
12:25am Mon 14 Nov 11
eddie the eagle
says...
12:31am Mon 14 Nov 11
eddie the eagle wrote:Reported in Mirror that Venkys would sell but Balija Rao is using his veto,apparently he is the football brains in the family.
Mrs Desai woke up this morning and found a horses head in her bed but has told LET that she will not sell.she stated that keeping that nice Mr Kean was more important than profit has she has already proved.
eddie the eagle
says...
12:33am Mon 14 Nov 11
eddie the eagle wrote:Reported in Mirror that Venkys would sell but Balija Rao is using his veto,apparently he is the football brains in the family.
Mrs Desai woke up this morning and found a horses head in her bed but has told LET that she will not sell.she stated that keeping that nice Mr Kean was more important than profit has she has already proved.
ChrisSutton
says...
1:01am Mon 14 Nov 11
Stone Island
says...
1:35am Mon 14 Nov 11
Keep Darwen Green wrote:"At least the venky's have a long term plan" To do what? Destroy us completely? KDG: I admire your optimism and positivity, it's a good quality to have. But, FFS you can't honestly believe that Venky's are doing a good job, can you?
J.C - Rishton wrote:That was my take on the best way forward as well, Let them buy a controlling share in the club as long term Venky's idea may pay handsomely whereas the Qatariis may want to bale as soon as the world cup is out of the way. They can't exactly expand the fan base in a country that has no football at all. People are just seeing the pound signs and not looking at longevity. At least the Venky's have a long term plan
ChrisSutton wrote:Chris - Unfortunatley I don't think these arabs operate by saying "I like it - I'm having it at any price" - everyone who deals with them knows they have pots of money but if they are made to pay over the odds then they just walk away - this was evident when the Dubai royals were looking at Liverpool - overall buyout/setup costs (similar to the Everton problem now).
ossyrover1 wrote:There's a lot of hearsay on this potential bid and a LOT of people claiming to be 'in the know'. We need to keep some healthy scepticism in mind.
ossyrover1 wrote:as i said earlier, the slumdogs dont want to sell. deal off.
apparantly venky's have said NO SALE
If a Qatar billionaire was seriously interested in buying a Premier League club, and wanted a club already with the infrastructure available, for sure, Rovers would be a sensible purchase.
Considering they'd have to pump in around £300-400 million to Everton for a new stadium, then raising their bid for Rovers by 20 or so million is absolute peanuts considering.
My point is: if they truly wanted Rovers/a PL club, they'd make a higher bid to Venkys.
People who claim to be in the know, may know some info, but they can never know the whole story. If this Qatar billionaire wanted to force Venkys to sell he could quite easily double his opening bid (again, peanuts compared to the cash outlay required at Everton). If they don't re-bid, then I question how serious THEY are about buying a PL club.
Will be interesting to see how this pans out. If the whole story becomes available that Venkys truly blocked a buy out from a billionaire, will Rovers fans ever forgive Venkys?
We'll be left in the Championship thinking what might have been.
-D.K.O
.
I don't think Venkys will sell because they are set on this "Rovers in India" theme. I think the only chance we have is if they sell a majority share to the Qataris and keep a minority holding and so the can still have a Rovers academy in Pune, still have the Rovers shops and still get Rovers over for games - this isnt that outlandish as when the Quatris recently bought PSG they only bought 70% of the club - the previous owners retained 30% share in the club.
mrconcept
says...
5:32am Mon 14 Nov 11
roversok
says...
7:33am Mon 14 Nov 11
roversok
says...
7:38am Mon 14 Nov 11
saint.george
says...
8:01am Mon 14 Nov 11
roversok wrote:Maybe because they were trying to get their hands on Man U ...
Why was this interest not show 12 months ago, they have a vested interest in acquiring football clubs, BRFC was for sale a long time before Venkey's got their hands on us. This lot had there chance then to buy Rovers.
Looks like we are the unluckiest club in the Premiership, as Kean keeps telling us.
Love Rovers
Hate Kean
Russ ov the rovers
says...
8:05am Mon 14 Nov 11
Russ ov the rovers
says...
8:05am Mon 14 Nov 11
J.C - Rishton
says...
8:15am Mon 14 Nov 11
gunishment
says...
8:26am Mon 14 Nov 11
Stone Island wrote:Just before I start, a very large part of me never thought we would be better off under Venky's than under the Walker's, and some of tried to urge a degree of scepticism amongst other fans, because large multi national companies rarely do things with the intention of losing money. We had infrastructure in place, we had a proportionally successful team to our fanbase/revenue, and they made it quite clear from start they were never going to invest silly money. All that said, I never thought they could have been quite this misguided/arrogant/i
Keep Darwen Green wrote:"At least the venky's have a long term plan" To do what? Destroy us completely? KDG: I admire your optimism and positivity, it's a good quality to have. But, FFS you can't honestly believe that Venky's are doing a good job, can you?
J.C - Rishton wrote:That was my take on the best way forward as well, Let them buy a controlling share in the club as long term Venky's idea may pay handsomely whereas the Qatariis may want to bale as soon as the world cup is out of the way. They can't exactly expand the fan base in a country that has no football at all. People are just seeing the pound signs and not looking at longevity. At least the Venky's have a long term plan
ChrisSutton wrote:Chris - Unfortunatley I don't think these arabs operate by saying "I like it - I'm having it at any price" - everyone who deals with them knows they have pots of money but if they are made to pay over the odds then they just walk away - this was evident when the Dubai royals were looking at Liverpool - overall buyout/setup costs (similar to the Everton problem now).
ossyrover1 wrote:There's a lot of hearsay on this potential bid and a LOT of people claiming to be 'in the know'. We need to keep some healthy scepticism in mind.
ossyrover1 wrote:as i said earlier, the slumdogs dont want to sell. deal off.
apparantly venky's have said NO SALE
If a Qatar billionaire was seriously interested in buying a Premier League club, and wanted a club already with the infrastructure available, for sure, Rovers would be a sensible purchase.
Considering they'd have to pump in around £300-400 million to Everton for a new stadium, then raising their bid for Rovers by 20 or so million is absolute peanuts considering.
My point is: if they truly wanted Rovers/a PL club, they'd make a higher bid to Venkys.
People who claim to be in the know, may know some info, but they can never know the whole story. If this Qatar billionaire wanted to force Venkys to sell he could quite easily double his opening bid (again, peanuts compared to the cash outlay required at Everton). If they don't re-bid, then I question how serious THEY are about buying a PL club.
Will be interesting to see how this pans out. If the whole story becomes available that Venkys truly blocked a buy out from a billionaire, will Rovers fans ever forgive Venkys?
We'll be left in the Championship thinking what might have been.
-D.K.O
.
I don't think Venkys will sell because they are set on this "Rovers in India" theme. I think the only chance we have is if they sell a majority share to the Qataris and keep a minority holding and so the can still have a Rovers academy in Pune, still have the Rovers shops and still get Rovers over for games - this isnt that outlandish as when the Quatris recently bought PSG they only bought 70% of the club - the previous owners retained 30% share in the club.
I've asked several fans over the last couple of weeks, if they thought we are better off now, than we were 12 months ago. Only one responded: baldie. Bizarrely, he thought we were. One of the reasons he gave was that Venky's offered cheap tickets. As I said, bizarre.
So KDG, I will ask you the same question. Is BRFC now better off under Venky's, than it was under the Walker Trust?
gunishment
says...
8:46am Mon 14 Nov 11
gunishment
says...
8:50am Mon 14 Nov 11
getkeanout
says...
8:54am Mon 14 Nov 11
A Darener
says...
9:30am Mon 14 Nov 11
jack01
says...
9:52am Mon 14 Nov 11
gunishment wrote:Come off it. I accept that Everton have more potential when it comes to fanbase. But in today's modern football the size of your fanbase is irrelevant. It's not going to make any difference to a Qatari tycoon whether you can get 25,000 a week or 45,000 a week on watching. The difference in revenue that 20,000 people a week paying £10-20 a ticket can make might just get you a couple of players on £100,000 a week. The Qatari bloke at Malaga could have bought a club like Valencia or Atletico Madrid who can get gates of 50,000 a week, but he went for a club like Malaga whose ground only holds 28,000.
And one final thought. Objectively speaking, I know that's a hard concept for football but we will give it a go anyway, Everton would be a more attractive proposition for any serious potential investor. Their playing staff, as well as on and off field management are significantly stronger than ours at present (who would actually get into Moyes' team, Samba, Hoillet only to de dropped not tracking back and Ollson on the left wing). Like we were, they are a very well run club, but their fanbase is bigger than ours because they in a massive city, and I think if they had investment in the team and the fans onboard they could give 45k people to
home games, in a new stadium which in the grand scheme of things if we are talking about a half billion pound investment wouldn't cost all that much, especially if it was shared with their Red neighbours. We on the other hand have a set of stubborn owners, some good players but a lot either of whom are average or just not good enough, a lot of idiots in important managerial positions and will never get more than 30k people into Ewood regardless of how much success we were having because we don't have a hugely populated catchment area. Of course we are a great club with history, but as an investment I'm not sure we make that much sense, one of the reasons it took so long to find a buyer and we ended up with Venky's I suppose! Here's hoping I'm wrong...
jack01
says...
9:53am Mon 14 Nov 11
gunishment wrote:Come off it. I accept that Everton have more potential when it comes to fanbase. But in today's modern football the size of your fanbase is irrelevant. It's not going to make any difference to a Qatari tycoon whether you can get 25,000 a week or 45,000 a week on watching. The difference in revenue that 20,000 people a week paying £10-20 a ticket can make might just get you a couple of players on £100,000 a week. The Qatari bloke at Malaga could have bought a club like Valencia or Atletico Madrid who can get gates of 50,000 a week, but he went for a club like Malaga whose ground only holds 28,000.
And one final thought. Objectively speaking, I know that's a hard concept for football but we will give it a go anyway, Everton would be a more attractive proposition for any serious potential investor. Their playing staff, as well as on and off field management are significantly stronger than ours at present (who would actually get into Moyes' team, Samba, Hoillet only to de dropped not tracking back and Ollson on the left wing). Like we were, they are a very well run club, but their fanbase is bigger than ours because they in a massive city, and I think if they had investment in the team and the fans onboard they could give 45k people to
home games, in a new stadium which in the grand scheme of things if we are talking about a half billion pound investment wouldn't cost all that much, especially if it was shared with their Red neighbours. We on the other hand have a set of stubborn owners, some good players but a lot either of whom are average or just not good enough, a lot of idiots in important managerial positions and will never get more than 30k people into Ewood regardless of how much success we were having because we don't have a hugely populated catchment area. Of course we are a great club with history, but as an investment I'm not sure we make that much sense, one of the reasons it took so long to find a buyer and we ended up with Venky's I suppose! Here's hoping I'm wrong...
paladin101
says...
9:58am Mon 14 Nov 11
ChrisSutton wrote:The answer is definitely 'no'. Rovers fans will NEVER forgive Venkys if they block this takeover.
ossyrover1 wrote:There's a lot of hearsay on this potential bid and a LOT of people claiming to be 'in the know'. We need to keep some healthy scepticism in mind.
ossyrover1 wrote:as i said earlier, the slumdogs dont want to sell. deal off.
apparantly venky's have said NO SALE
If a Qatar billionaire was seriously interested in buying a Premier League club, and wanted a club already with the infrastructure available, for sure, Rovers would be a sensible purchase.
Considering they'd have to pump in around £300-400 million to Everton for a new stadium, then raising their bid for Rovers by 20 or so million is absolute peanuts considering.
My point is: if they truly wanted Rovers/a PL club, they'd make a higher bid to Venkys.
People who claim to be in the know, may know some info, but they can never know the whole story. If this Qatar billionaire wanted to force Venkys to sell he could quite easily double his opening bid (again, peanuts compared to the cash outlay required at Everton). If they don't re-bid, then I question how serious THEY are about buying a PL club.
Will be interesting to see how this pans out. If the whole story becomes available that Venkys truly blocked a buy out from a billionaire, will Rovers fans ever forgive Venkys?
We'll be left in the Championship thinking what might have been.
-D.K.O
J.C - Rishton
says...
10:06am Mon 14 Nov 11
gunishment wrote:Hi - I don't think you are right on the Everton V Rovers investment - they (the arabs simply don't seem to think like that).
And one final thought. Objectively speaking, I know that's a hard concept for football but we will give it a go anyway, Everton would be a more attractive proposition for any serious potential investor. Their playing staff, as well as on and off field management are significantly stronger than ours at present (who would actually get into Moyes' team, Samba, Hoillet only to de dropped not tracking back and Ollson on the left wing). Like we were, they are a very well run club, but their fanbase is bigger than ours because they in a massive city, and I think if they had investment in the team and the fans onboard they could give 45k people to
home games, in a new stadium which in the grand scheme of things if we are talking about a half billion pound investment wouldn't cost all that much, especially if it was shared with their Red neighbours. We on the other hand have a set of stubborn owners, some good players but a lot either of whom are average or just not good enough, a lot of idiots in important managerial positions and will never get more than 30k people into Ewood regardless of how much success we were having because we don't have a hugely populated catchment area. Of course we are a great club with history, but as an investment I'm not sure we make that much sense, one of the reasons it took so long to find a buyer and we ended up with Venky's I suppose! Here's hoping I'm wrong...
Suffolk n Watt
says...
10:29am Mon 14 Nov 11
J.C - Rishton wrote:I accept your view that they may not be barred,but with Platini's new laws coming into effect you have to look at it seriously.
Suffolk n Watt wrote:I understand where you are coming from but like Sir Alex - I don't agree with you, when push comes to shove no club will be excluded, a deal will be done with FIFA and these new measures will be postponed or clubs will simply get round it by the owners putting in the investment under the guise of "sponsership" - the sponsers and TV companies want the best, not necessarily the best run and, as the saying goes "he who pays the piper, calles the tune".
J.C - Rishton wrote:This is why Man City are trying to wipe out their overspending with a 10year £400 million pound sponsorship,which has been pointed out that it's an inflated deal just to overcome their spending woes.
Suffolk n Watt wrote:I am sorry but are you saying we should stick with Venkys over the Qatar Royal family cos if they pumped millions of £s into us and we qualified from the champions league then we would be barred from entering the competition ?.
There are a few big problems that some people are not taking into account.
If they were taken over by the oil barons on the basis that they want to transform the club into a Champions League team, they can't splash out these massive amounts of money on players and wages as FIFA's new financial play laws started this season.
They would be barred from entering the Champions League and Europa Cup.
This is why Venkys have signed young inexperienced players on low wages just to stand a slight chance of getting into Europe.
Rovers have a relatively new ground and the capacity is about right as new fans are hard to find whilst money is tight.
Prices will have to go up in the near future just to get the wages to turnover ratio down,and then most fans will not pay the extra ticket price.
Like it or not Rovers will become a selling club with no prospects in the next 20 years of ever challenging for honours unless 200,000 new homes are built in the area and thats just not going to happen.
The only thing they can do is try and keep the club within the top ten and thats about the best any rovers fan can hope for.
As much as it pains me i'm a lifelong Rovers fan, so effectively we are stuck with Venkys but we don't have to be stuck with Kean.
.
That is completely illogical - I would rather finish 4th in the EPL and NOT allowed to play in Europe than finish 16th in the EPL and not qualify for Europe anyway.
.
Also Sir Alex said recently that he didnt believe that these "financial restrictions or club barings" from the Champions league would happen -and I agree with him.
.
At the moment - City and Chelsea, prob Man U, AC Milan and Barcelona would all not qualify - can you honestly see these clubs being bared from the competition ?? - it will never happen because the TV companies simply would not allow it
No oil baron would want to put in massive amounts of money unless they got a champions league spot as where would they make any money from.
Utd have been under the wages to turnover ratio for years and would qualify,Chelsea spent a massive amount the year before and will not spend anywhere near what they have done in the last few years anymore.
Barcelona are just on the cusp of qualifying as Cesc Fabregas had to take a pay cut just to join them.
Its a catch 22 situation that will only make the big clubs even bigger.
It will be 3 years before the barring starts so many will be trying to get their house in order.
.
Also what you have said dosent hold water either when you look at other small clubs round Europe that are getting hugh outside investment into.
Anzhi - Russian club that employs the "highest paid player in world football" and also Malaga (a club of similar size to Rovers) who just happen to have been bought by one of the Qatar princes - your FIFA rules dosent seem to be bothering these new owners, they are both planning to plough millions into their clubs and have said this is the start of their player investment.
.
Also, who cares if we got barred from playing in European comps anyway - we arn't at the moment nor will we if this downward spiral carries on. I would rather have huge investment in the club and then worry about "Champions league exclusion" if that problem ever arose.
.
I don't see many Man City fans worrying about it and I don't see any planned slow down in player investment either - like city, clubs will just get round it by larger sponsership deals from their own owners
paladin101
says...
2:26pm Mon 14 Nov 11
alfa111
says...
4:17pm Mon 14 Nov 11
ROVERSCAN
says...
5:37pm Mon 14 Nov 11
alfa111
says...
7:00pm Mon 14 Nov 11
RoversLoyal
says...
7:30pm Mon 14 Nov 11
Keep Darwen Green wrote:...another vulgar rant.
RoversLoyal wrote:Is that your take on the subject? I would have preferred an opinion like stone islands or adcr, at least they have one, instead of your usual stalking, do you have an opinion on anything but what I post? Why do you wait until I post and then jump on it like some deranged nutter from broadmoore? Are you Ian Huntley with computer time? probably frothing at the mouth yanking the end off it waiting for the taser squad to arrive.
J.C - Rishton wrote:The Darwen Hag would love this story to be false, you can just sense it in the tone of her post - another arrogant contribution from a Kean/Venky lickspittle.
Keep Darwen Green wrote:You know I don't like to agree with you but in this case I do - I think Venkies will not sell unless they were to receive a huge profit on their investment - otherwise they do have their own (secretive) plan and they'll stick with it.
Oh and for what its worth my prediction is Venky's won't sell, but then again, I'm always wrong aren't I boys. In my eyes they took on a five year plan and its just twelve months in so I reckon, unless they are offered seriously stupid money, they will still be our owners in twelve months.
.
But this will just show how little they actually care about the club - preventing someone who would be hugely beneficial and could transform us back to previous glories, just for their own petty, selfish motives.
.
If they turn down this sale then don't seriously invest in the club themselves then ALL Rovers fans must never forget and never forgive them.
So, whats your opinion? Nightstalker
gunishment
says...
12:06am Tue 15 Nov 11
J.C - Rishton wrote:Hi J.C, and Jack01. I totally accept both of both of your points, all I would say is if money truly is no object, why not but Man Utd?
gunishment wrote:Hi - I don't think you are right on the Everton V Rovers investment - they (the arabs simply don't seem to think like that).
And one final thought. Objectively speaking, I know that's a hard concept for football but we will give it a go anyway, Everton would be a more attractive proposition for any serious potential investor. Their playing staff, as well as on and off field management are significantly stronger than ours at present (who would actually get into Moyes' team, Samba, Hoillet only to de dropped not tracking back and Ollson on the left wing). Like we were, they are a very well run club, but their fanbase is bigger than ours because they in a massive city, and I think if they had investment in the team and the fans onboard they could give 45k people to
home games, in a new stadium which in the grand scheme of things if we are talking about a half billion pound investment wouldn't cost all that much, especially if it was shared with their Red neighbours. We on the other hand have a set of stubborn owners, some good players but a lot either of whom are average or just not good enough, a lot of idiots in important managerial positions and will never get more than 30k people into Ewood regardless of how much success we were having because we don't have a hugely populated catchment area. Of course we are a great club with history, but as an investment I'm not sure we make that much sense, one of the reasons it took so long to find a buyer and we ended up with Venky's I suppose! Here's hoping I'm wrong...
.
They are not looking at our (or Evertons current squad) they couldnt care less about either - they intend to buy players far far better than we or Everton currently have.
.
Also if you look at the football clubs the arabs have bought they seem to want low cost, low dept, with good infrasctucture already in place (ground, training facility etc). They seem to want to just pour money into players not grounds - this has been highlighted by the fact that this was a major stumbling block with the purchase of Liverpool a few years ago and is a problem now with Everton.
.
They also don't worry about buying clubs with huge fan base as the purchase of Malaga recently shows - a club with no huge fan base but it has a decent enough ground and very little historical sucess in Spanish football
.
Lastly THEY ARE NOT LOOKING FOR A RETURN ON THEIR INVESTMENT - they are rich beyond what people like us (or Venkys even) can hardly comprehend - to illustrate this point Man City have just anounced losses of £150m for the last year (and this does not include their summer purchases) - do you think their owners are worried by this loss - no, they couldnt care less.
Peter Henni
says...
10:28am Tue 15 Nov 11
Dave139
says...
2:22pm Tue 15 Nov 11
saint.george
says...
8:57am Thu 17 Nov 11
gunishment wrote:Why not buy Man U ? Because they don't want to sell. Just like BRFC.
J.C - Rishton wrote:Hi J.C, and Jack01. I totally accept both of both of your points, all I would say is if money truly is no object, why not but Man Utd?
gunishment wrote:Hi - I don't think you are right on the Everton V Rovers investment - they (the arabs simply don't seem to think like that).
And one final thought. Objectively speaking, I know that's a hard concept for football but we will give it a go anyway, Everton would be a more attractive proposition for any serious potential investor. Their playing staff, as well as on and off field management are significantly stronger than ours at present (who would actually get into Moyes' team, Samba, Hoillet only to de dropped not tracking back and Ollson on the left wing). Like we were, they are a very well run club, but their fanbase is bigger than ours because they in a massive city, and I think if they had investment in the team and the fans onboard they could give 45k people to
home games, in a new stadium which in the grand scheme of things if we are talking about a half billion pound investment wouldn't cost all that much, especially if it was shared with their Red neighbours. We on the other hand have a set of stubborn owners, some good players but a lot either of whom are average or just not good enough, a lot of idiots in important managerial positions and will never get more than 30k people into Ewood regardless of how much success we were having because we don't have a hugely populated catchment area. Of course we are a great club with history, but as an investment I'm not sure we make that much sense, one of the reasons it took so long to find a buyer and we ended up with Venky's I suppose! Here's hoping I'm wrong...
.
They are not looking at our (or Evertons current squad) they couldnt care less about either - they intend to buy players far far better than we or Everton currently have.
.
Also if you look at the football clubs the arabs have bought they seem to want low cost, low dept, with good infrasctucture already in place (ground, training facility etc). They seem to want to just pour money into players not grounds - this has been highlighted by the fact that this was a major stumbling block with the purchase of Liverpool a few years ago and is a problem now with Everton.
.
They also don't worry about buying clubs with huge fan base as the purchase of Malaga recently shows - a club with no huge fan base but it has a decent enough ground and very little historical sucess in Spanish football
.
Lastly THEY ARE NOT LOOKING FOR A RETURN ON THEIR INVESTMENT - they are rich beyond what people like us (or Venkys even) can hardly comprehend - to illustrate this point Man City have just anounced losses of £150m for the last year (and this does not include their summer purchases) - do you think their owners are worried by this loss - no, they couldnt care less.
Jack I agree I infrastructure was once far superior to Evertons, that was before Venky's restructured. Now, apart from our youth set up, I fail to see how we rival many premier league clubs apart from in our history which is both recently and historically greater than many other clubs outside the top 4.
Search jobs in and around Lancashire
Search Now »
Find the right person for you
Search Now »
Search houses, flats, and all properties
Search Now »
Search new & used cars in and around Lancashire
Search Now »
alfa111 says...
9:34pm Sat 12 Nov 11