When news happens, text LT and your photos and videos to 80360. Or contact us by email or phone.
11:10am Monday 8th February 2010 in
SAM Allardyce admits his Blackburn Rovers side were not clever enough to see off Stoke City’s physical challenge – but insists referee Steve Bennett has to shoulder some of the blame as well.
The Rovers boss was furious with his side’s defending as they gifted the hosts a 2-0 half time lead but also pointed to key decisions in playing a part in the defeat.
Allardyce insists his side should have been awarded a penalty when Chris Samba’s header appeared to strike Dean Whitehead’s hand on the line, before blasting the decision to send off the African soon after the break.
He said: “We knew we would have to come here and work hard and anything we got we were going to have to make ourselves.
“What we didn’t do was stop Stoke doing what they do. If we had defended correctly we would have been well in the game.
“The blame is some of ours and some of the referees.
"It has accumulated in a very disappointing 3-0 defeat on our behalf.
“We didn’t match them physically because we are not quite as physical as them but we had to be cleverer.
"A lot of the time we weren't clever enough in our thought pattern and our game pattern.
“We got big chances though at 1-0 down, one was taken away by the official and the other one was a missed sitter from us.
"They are the critical moments and we didn't get them right.”
Danny Higginbotham volleyed Stoke ahead on just nine minutes, after being left unmarked by Pascal Chimbonda, before Gael Givet allowed Mamady Sidibe double the lead on 45 minutes.
Matthew Etherington made sure of the win after the break with a third, although by then Samba had already seen red for being booked twice for innocuous challenges.
Allardyce said: “It is easy to see where we have gone wrong for the first goal.
"By not marking the Stoke players correctly and because we haven’t done that, we have been working on it for two days, we decide to let Higginbotham free.
“Great credit for the finish but we should have had someone nearer.
“So we go 1-0 down and it is not the end of the world.
"We come storming back, we have Franco's header from six yards out that has to hit the target.
“Then we have got that flurry of corners, six on the trot, and there is huge pressure on Stoke.
"Then Chris Samba comes up with a monster, monster header – the ball is going in the back of the net and Whitehead puts his arm out and it goes wide.
“It should have been 1-1, or a penalty and Stoke down to 10 men and us back in the game.
"It is unfair from our point of view and it is the second time we have had this situation. We had the same at West Ham and we have been really given a bitter pill to swallow.
“It it is not the referee’s fault for our defending on the second goal, that is poor defending from Givet at the far post and of course it is an uphill battle.
“Then lo and behold we bizarrely get Chris Samba sent off.
"I don’t know why he was booked for the first one. Now it is a sending off and we miss him.
"All in all a very disappointing day indeed.”
Comments(48)
Ossy blue
says...
11:22am Mon 8 Feb 10
Stone Island
says...
11:42am Mon 8 Feb 10
BRFCBrabant
says...
12:07pm Mon 8 Feb 10
jeppo
says...
12:50pm Mon 8 Feb 10
blueandwhitey79
says...
12:54pm Mon 8 Feb 10
eddie the eagle
says...
1:13pm Mon 8 Feb 10
eddie the eagle
says...
1:16pm Mon 8 Feb 10
harwoodblue
says...
1:24pm Mon 8 Feb 10
eddie the eagle
says...
1:30pm Mon 8 Feb 10
Kappy
says...
1:47pm Mon 8 Feb 10
harwoodblue
says...
2:13pm Mon 8 Feb 10
eddie the eagle wrote:I wouldnt mind if the were 50p or £1's against Sunderland the amount of coins that hit me on the back of the head would have paid for my bargain bin season ticket.
HARWOODBLUE:Maybe the tragic events at weekend will deter the coin throwers or am I just being naive.
bed and breakfast man_!
says...
2:31pm Mon 8 Feb 10
Stone Island wrote:You have put what i was thinking,Some still have the blinkers on , To what Sam is doing to Blackburn Rovers.....
Your not clever enough Sam, and that is the problem. The game has moved on in the last few years, unfortunately, you haven't. . Talking of moving on?
Morst
says...
2:50pm Mon 8 Feb 10
jeppo wrote:Hey is that a chink of light reaching the bunker Jeppo?
Stoke played ugly football, their win shouldn't count. Some of their fans even cheered their long ball goals...the world's going mad!!
Morst
says...
2:55pm Mon 8 Feb 10
bed and breakfast man_! wrote:Hey B+B how's it going?
Stone Island wrote:You have put what i was thinking,Some still have the blinkers on , To what Sam is doing to Blackburn Rovers.....
Your not clever enough Sam, and that is the problem. The game has moved on in the last few years, unfortunately, you haven't. . Talking of moving on?
Dragging us down.
bed and breakfast man_!
says...
3:33pm Mon 8 Feb 10
Morst wrote:Hey up Morst, I am fine thanks, I hate to sound negative with my post.
bed and breakfast man_! wrote:Hey B+B how's it going? . I think we have been good to our word this season and given Sam a chance but now the worry is could he destroy our squad of ball players before we get rid of him? . He just has only one way to play and it will never be welcome at BRFC. I could not care if we were top 10 like Stoke playing that drivel would still depress me and send me back to the armchair until he goes. . 31st.......Stone Island wrote: Your not clever enough Sam, and that is the problem. The game has moved on in the last few years, unfortunately, you haven't. . Talking of moving on?You have put what i was thinking,Some still have the blinkers on , To what Sam is doing to Blackburn Rovers..... Dragging us down.
therighthon
says...
3:51pm Mon 8 Feb 10
Bill Carson
says...
4:26pm Mon 8 Feb 10
jeppo
says...
4:46pm Mon 8 Feb 10
floydbrfc
says...
4:59pm Mon 8 Feb 10
Morst
says...
5:26pm Mon 8 Feb 10
jeppo wrote:As long as we play FOOTBALL and not hoofball Jeppo I really don't care!
But the fact is, Rovers WILL stay up. We will also finish in a higher position than we did last season, and with a lower wage bill, and a younger average age of squad. It may be grim along the way, but that is the reality of it.
Referring to Eddies post above...if it is the case that 'fan power' wants Sam out, surely our Premiership future needs to be number one priority. Can we pay Sam off, bring a new manager in and then expect him to progress to the level expected within the constraints - or is that too much of a gamble?
Morst
says...
5:28pm Mon 8 Feb 10
tommalta
says...
5:36pm Mon 8 Feb 10
Miller11
says...
5:42pm Mon 8 Feb 10
jeppo wrote:It is certainly not a fact we will stay up. Especially when you consider who we have to play. A lot of our remaining fixtures our manager has a habit of throwing.
But the fact is, Rovers WILL stay up. We will also finish in a higher position than we did last season, and with a lower wage bill, and a younger average age of squad. It may be grim along the way, but that is the reality of it.
Referring to Eddies post above...if it is the case that 'fan power' wants Sam out, surely our Premiership future needs to be number one priority. Can we pay Sam off, bring a new manager in and then expect him to progress to the level expected within the constraints - or is that too much of a gamble?
Billypieman
says...
6:27pm Mon 8 Feb 10
Morst
says...
7:03pm Mon 8 Feb 10
jeppo
says...
7:09pm Mon 8 Feb 10
Jarred
says...
7:17pm Mon 8 Feb 10
marghen
says...
7:26pm Mon 8 Feb 10
Miller11 wrote:Jeppo my sweetie, realism is what miller says
jeppo wrote: But the fact is, Rovers WILL stay up. We will also finish in a higher position than we did last season, and with a lower wage bill, and a younger average age of squad. It may be grim along the way, but that is the reality of it. Referring to Eddies post above...if it is the case that 'fan power' wants Sam out, surely our Premiership future needs to be number one priority. Can we pay Sam off, bring a new manager in and then expect him to progress to the level expected within the constraints - or is that too much of a gamble?It is certainly not a fact we will stay up. Especially when you consider who we have to play. A lot of our remaining fixtures our manager has a habit of throwing.
banjo's at ewood
says...
7:29pm Mon 8 Feb 10
BRFCBrabant
says...
8:13pm Mon 8 Feb 10
BRFCBrabant
says...
8:16pm Mon 8 Feb 10
Miller11
says...
8:29pm Mon 8 Feb 10
Rovers Number 9
says...
8:30pm Mon 8 Feb 10
hasslem hasslem
says...
8:45pm Mon 8 Feb 10
marghen wrote:I agree largely with your assessement, but am trying to be more optimistic.
Miller11 wrote:Jeppo my sweetie, realism is what miller says . Man U H Arsenal H Chelsea H Spurs A Liverpool A Villa A . Definitely no points from these games -so that leaves… . Birmingham H Everton H Wolves A Burnley A ..can anyone guarantee picking points up Brum & Toffees showing great form of late very hard games-Wolves away similar trip to the Stoke fixture -tough Dingles 31 years coming to an end -their home form is superb. 3 points at most from these IMO . The critical fixtures . Hull H Bolton H Portsmouth A These are the most important games of the season, the winnable games, will we win them all? No- 5/6 points at most IMO . Total points 8/9 at best- Total points for the season 36/7points at best IMO-jeppo wrote: But the fact is, Rovers WILL stay up. We will also finish in a higher position than we did last season, and with a lower wage bill, and a younger average age of squad. It may be grim along the way, but that is the reality of it. Referring to Eddies post above...if it is the case that 'fan power' wants Sam out, surely our Premiership future needs to be number one priority. Can we pay Sam off, bring a new manager in and then expect him to progress to the level expected within the constraints - or is that too much of a gamble?It is certainly not a fact we will stay up. Especially when you consider who we have to play. A lot of our remaining fixtures our manager has a habit of throwing.
Miller11
says...
8:47pm Mon 8 Feb 10
Rovers Number 9 wrote:"I'm pleased with the 3 points. It means we don't have to go and get a win against west ham."
I think BFS will keep us up. I just wished he have given Tugay an extra year, he might have only played 50 mins a game , he was the only clever player we had, I rather have Tugay the great rather than Salgardo the inpersonator. We need to keep the faith and the FANS get behind the team. STOP THE NEGATIVITY
eddie the eagle
says...
9:28pm Mon 8 Feb 10
hasslem hasslem
says...
10:22pm Mon 8 Feb 10
Coach Taylor
says...
10:44pm Mon 8 Feb 10
local chap
says...
11:01pm Mon 8 Feb 10
BRFCBrabant wrote:shearer and hendry defo but to be honest it wont happen we need someone older but not has old has sam ,o'leary ,southgate,jewell,cl
Anybody fancy a shearer and newell partnership again??
Roverthere
says...
5:06am Tue 9 Feb 10
Morst
says...
9:22am Tue 9 Feb 10
Jarred wrote:Sorry mate but that quote I gave is taken from THE CHAIRMANS own STATEMENT from the recently published accounts!
'And Jeppo the board have said we are a trading club and not a selling club for at least the next 4 years - compare that to several other teams.'
I'm afraid you're wrong their Morst. In his latest interview, JW admitted that player sales were offsetting the deficit created by high wages.
£5 million of Roque Santa Cruz's transfer fee went to offset last year's £5 million loss.
£5 million of Stephen Warnock's fee went to offset a predicted £5 million loss this year.
So Sam Allardyce worked on a -£10,000,000 transfer budget last summer (approx £25 million sold, approx £15 million bought).
Do you still think a young manager could come in and keep us up and play entertaining football on that sort of budget?
I understand your concerns, but the simple fact is that if we fire Sam and bring in a younger, less experienced manager, we could very well end up in the championship.
The only available manager with the experience of keeping teams in the Premiership other than Sam that I can think of is Alan Curbishley - but he's gone on record as saying he'd want to take over a club with some resources so he could push the top half of the table.
I can see how a -£5 million a year budget is going to impress him.
jeppo
says...
9:27am Tue 9 Feb 10
hasslem hasslem
says...
10:00am Tue 9 Feb 10
Morst
says...
10:22am Tue 9 Feb 10
up_norf
says...
12:09pm Tue 9 Feb 10
jeppo
says...
2:33pm Tue 9 Feb 10
hasslem hasslem
says...
3:26pm Tue 9 Feb 10
Comments on Blackburn Rovers stories following the Jerome Anderson interview with Sky Sports have been frozen on this website after the Lancashire Telegraph received a letter from Mr Anderson’s solicitors. However, later tomorrow (Friday) we are setting up a new facility for readers to post their comments on Blackburn Rovers at (insert email address here). The LT will continue to allow fair and even robust comments on this subject acknowledging the depth of feeling of supporters and their right to express their opinions as long as these comments are lawful and obey our house rules . But we refuse to accept defamatory and unproven accusations of criminal or other wrongful activity which break the rules governing the comments facility.
Enter your postcode, town or place name
Search jobs in and around Lancashire
Search Now »
Find the right person for you
Search Now »
Search houses, flats, and all properties
Search Now »
Search new & used cars in and around Lancashire
Search Now »
blueette says...
11:21am Mon 8 Feb 10
Stop attributing our inept performances to referees - nobody but yourself is to blame for the paucity of our squad and the cowardliness of an approach which sees you stick a centre forward on the right wing to match up with Stoke
Let's face the facts - Stoke are a horrible, non-footballing side but we are an even worse version of the same who couldn't match them in any area of the field
Your tactics and whole demeanour are a shameful embarassment to a club which two years ago was challenging for a top six or seven spot playing proper football
Keep us up and resign - you will never be loved or accepted here, just tolerated as long as you don't visit complete disaster upon us to go along with the 50-odd games of utterly unwatchable garbage you have served up