Blackburn Rovers again refused permission for Sherwood talks

10:47am Wednesday 17th October 2012 in Sport

BLACKBURN Rovers have again been knocked back in their efforts to speak to former skipper Tim Sherwood about their vacant managerial position.

Sherwood is high on Rovers’ wish list as they attempt to appoint a new boss to replace the departed Steve Kean.

But the 43-year-old is currently working as Tottenham’s technical co-ordinator and the North London club have now refused another approach from Rovers to speak to Sherwood.

For more on this story, see tomorrow’s Lancashire Telegraph.

Comments (127)

10:49am Wed 17 Oct 12

roverfoxy says...

Balls!!!
Balls!!! roverfoxy

10:50am Wed 17 Oct 12

kazz says...

Get in shearer with an experienced assistant
Get in shearer with an experienced assistant kazz

10:55am Wed 17 Oct 12

Nurseman says...

Lets move on!
Lets move on! Nurseman

10:57am Wed 17 Oct 12

earwego says...

Black it is then. The farce continues.
Black it is then. The farce continues. earwego

10:59am Wed 17 Oct 12

MatthewCA says...

Last two weeks they said the same - one name in media - Sherwood. Is there any confirmation about his interest in the job ?

Get one who act fast into the ground with players. even players also lost focus if u continue like this. Now Blackburn rovers Club is just like a headless chicken in the championship.

Hope Sherwood will soon find his Ewood love.
Last two weeks they said the same - one name in media - Sherwood. Is there any confirmation about his interest in the job ? Get one who act fast into the ground with players. even players also lost focus if u continue like this. Now Blackburn rovers Club is just like a headless chicken in the championship. Hope Sherwood will soon find his Ewood love. MatthewCA

11:00am Wed 17 Oct 12

MxMave says...

NO ONE WANTS SHERWOOD!
HE HAS NIL EXPERIENCE!
SHERWOOD OUT! SHERWOOD OUT! (BEFORE HES EVEN IN)

They want to appoint Sherwood so that they can keep the rest of the backroom staff in place and keep control over the team.
NO ONE WANTS SHERWOOD! HE HAS NIL EXPERIENCE! SHERWOOD OUT! SHERWOOD OUT! (BEFORE HES EVEN IN) They want to appoint Sherwood so that they can keep the rest of the backroom staff in place and keep control over the team. MxMave

11:03am Wed 17 Oct 12

HitchinRover says...

I think Sherwood is a much better candidate than Shearer. Still OGS as my number 1 choice though
I think Sherwood is a much better candidate than Shearer. Still OGS as my number 1 choice though HitchinRover

11:15am Wed 17 Oct 12

Rovers 1495 says...

What a bunch of assh*les
What a bunch of assh*les Rovers 1495

11:16am Wed 17 Oct 12

Steve BB2 says...

OGS has said he is staying at Molde until at least the end of the season and has distanced himself from a move to any Northwest club.

Sherwood has apparently said he would like to talk to the owners and is meant to be having a meeting with the Rao brothers in Switzerland to discuss things.
Although if this report is correct then he wont be meeting with them after all.

Personally I would like us to pursue Holloway and compensation is likely to be less and he has the experience and ability we need right now.
OGS has said he is staying at Molde until at least the end of the season and has distanced himself from a move to any Northwest club. Sherwood has apparently said he would like to talk to the owners and is meant to be having a meeting with the Rao brothers in Switzerland to discuss things. Although if this report is correct then he wont be meeting with them after all. Personally I would like us to pursue Holloway and compensation is likely to be less and he has the experience and ability we need right now. Steve BB2

11:27am Wed 17 Oct 12

J.C - Rishton says...

earwego wrote:
Black it is then. The farce continues.
I have a horrible feeling you will be right.

Unless Sherwood forces the issue with Spurs and they relent and let him talk to Rovers (which is still possible as DL is known as a very hard negociator).

If Rovers turn their attention to IH I can see Blackpool also refusing us permission to speak to him - then Rovers will win one of our next 2 games and hey presto, slam dunk, Black will be appointed within 36 hours of us scaping a 1 0 win against some no hoper team.
[quote][p][bold]earwego[/bold] wrote: Black it is then. The farce continues.[/p][/quote]I have a horrible feeling you will be right. Unless Sherwood forces the issue with Spurs and they relent and let him talk to Rovers (which is still possible as DL is known as a very hard negociator). If Rovers turn their attention to IH I can see Blackpool also refusing us permission to speak to him - then Rovers will win one of our next 2 games and hey presto, slam dunk, Black will be appointed within 36 hours of us scaping a 1 0 win against some no hoper team. J.C - Rishton

11:34am Wed 17 Oct 12

Is Eckersley playing? says...

We can't have it all ways. There has been complaints that they are looking for someone cheap. I am not particularly imbued with Sherwood but there's no doubt he wouldn't come cheap, either in compensation or wages. Yet it seems they won't give up the chase. Let's face it, they can't suit everbody with their choice and its not a decison I'd like to make. I fancy big Sam would still be here but for Venkys apalling, hasty decision. Now they are reaping the whirlwind. I'm just going to sit back now and await the decision. But if they get it wrong they might as well sell up....there won't be another chance!
We can't have it all ways. There has been complaints that they are looking for someone cheap. I am not particularly imbued with Sherwood but there's no doubt he wouldn't come cheap, either in compensation or wages. Yet it seems they won't give up the chase. Let's face it, they can't suit everbody with their choice and its not a decison I'd like to make. I fancy big Sam would still be here but for Venkys apalling, hasty decision. Now they are reaping the whirlwind. I'm just going to sit back now and await the decision. But if they get it wrong they might as well sell up....there won't be another chance! Is Eckersley playing?

11:34am Wed 17 Oct 12

buckoff says...

Its obvious black is there man. But they will continue chasing anyone thats not available. Venkys are living in cookoo land thinking they can pull chicken feathers over our eyes tossers.
Its obvious black is there man. But they will continue chasing anyone thats not available. Venkys are living in cookoo land thinking they can pull chicken feathers over our eyes tossers. buckoff

11:35am Wed 17 Oct 12

FannyTickler says...

Keep lowering your sights. You'll be wishing you still had Kean...
Keep lowering your sights. You'll be wishing you still had Kean... FannyTickler

11:40am Wed 17 Oct 12

Tatts says...

Holloway is a better option. He likes teams to pass the ball and he has plenty of experience of managing footballers, which is something Sherwood doesn't have.

Would any other club in our position be interested in Sherwood as manager? The answer is surely no.
Holloway is a better option. He likes teams to pass the ball and he has plenty of experience of managing footballers, which is something Sherwood doesn't have. Would any other club in our position be interested in Sherwood as manager? The answer is surely no. Tatts

11:42am Wed 17 Oct 12

eddie the eagle says...

Kean had no playing career no managerial experience and lacked leadership skills or carisma,so when it went tits up the crowd gave him what he deserved,nothing.The

y didn't believe in him and they wanted him out.
Sherwood has all the above attributes except managerial experience,but he runs the youth system at Spurs and must be good at it because levy won't let him go.
I don't know if Sherwood is the answer,who is look at Hughes not doing well is he but I would think most fans would have him back.
There are no guarentees but I think its worth a gamble,OGS would be my first choice but Sherwood tiks similar boxes.As long as we don't get Black he is a step back.
Kean had no playing career no managerial experience and lacked leadership skills or carisma,so when it went tits up the crowd gave him what he deserved,nothing.The y didn't believe in him and they wanted him out. Sherwood has all the above attributes except managerial experience,but he runs the youth system at Spurs and must be good at it because levy won't let him go. I don't know if Sherwood is the answer,who is look at Hughes not doing well is he but I would think most fans would have him back. There are no guarentees but I think its worth a gamble,OGS would be my first choice but Sherwood tiks similar boxes.As long as we don't get Black he is a step back. eddie the eagle

11:43am Wed 17 Oct 12

waggyonthewing says...

if sherwood wants the job he,s gonna have to stand up and tell spurs where to get off,there wont be alot they could do about it,or is it all down to money and greed again!!personally i would like to give keith hill a chance,he,s done his apprenticeship in the lower leagues(worked wonders really)and deserves a chance,saying all that i would also be happy with sherwood.c,mon rovers get it sorted!!
if sherwood wants the job he,s gonna have to stand up and tell spurs where to get off,there wont be alot they could do about it,or is it all down to money and greed again!!personally i would like to give keith hill a chance,he,s done his apprenticeship in the lower leagues(worked wonders really)and deserves a chance,saying all that i would also be happy with sherwood.c,mon rovers get it sorted!! waggyonthewing

11:49am Wed 17 Oct 12

Brfc24138931 says...

One word "CLUELESS"
One word "CLUELESS" Brfc24138931

11:49am Wed 17 Oct 12

roversjeff says...

Get your act together Venky's! How long is this saga going on for? Interview someone and appoint someone this week. The longer you idiots leave it the further down the table we will go!
Get your act together Venky's! How long is this saga going on for? Interview someone and appoint someone this week. The longer you idiots leave it the further down the table we will go! roversjeff

12:16pm Wed 17 Oct 12

Bazzer says...

Is Eckersley playing? wrote:
We can't have it all ways. There has been complaints that they are looking for someone cheap. I am not particularly imbued with Sherwood but there's no doubt he wouldn't come cheap, either in compensation or wages. Yet it seems they won't give up the chase. Let's face it, they can't suit everbody with their choice and its not a decison I'd like to make. I fancy big Sam would still be here but for Venkys apalling, hasty decision. Now they are reaping the whirlwind. I'm just going to sit back now and await the decision. But if they get it wrong they might as well sell up....there won't be another chance!
Of course the decision to sack Big Sam is going to reverberate for many years to come. In that one swinging of the axe this club was cast into the wilderness. It was a diabolical business decision very badly executed, leaving a bad taste in the mouth. It was also the most stupid footballing decision, albeit applauded by some, particularly on here.
The reputation and position of Blackburn Rovers still hurtles downwards.
[quote][p][bold]Is Eckersley playing?[/bold] wrote: We can't have it all ways. There has been complaints that they are looking for someone cheap. I am not particularly imbued with Sherwood but there's no doubt he wouldn't come cheap, either in compensation or wages. Yet it seems they won't give up the chase. Let's face it, they can't suit everbody with their choice and its not a decison I'd like to make. I fancy big Sam would still be here but for Venkys apalling, hasty decision. Now they are reaping the whirlwind. I'm just going to sit back now and await the decision. But if they get it wrong they might as well sell up....there won't be another chance![/p][/quote]Of course the decision to sack Big Sam is going to reverberate for many years to come. In that one swinging of the axe this club was cast into the wilderness. It was a diabolical business decision very badly executed, leaving a bad taste in the mouth. It was also the most stupid footballing decision, albeit applauded by some, particularly on here. The reputation and position of Blackburn Rovers still hurtles downwards. Bazzer

12:17pm Wed 17 Oct 12

Stone Island: says...

Good. Sherwood isn't the man for the job anyway. Haven't we learned our lesson over the years? Let the next Alex Fergusons of the world practice at some other club! FFS, GO FOR SOMEONE WHO HAS DONE THE JOB BEFORE! Not rocket science, is it?
Good. Sherwood isn't the man for the job anyway. Haven't we learned our lesson over the years? Let the next Alex Fergusons of the world practice at some other club! FFS, GO FOR SOMEONE WHO HAS DONE THE JOB BEFORE! Not rocket science, is it? Stone Island:

12:18pm Wed 17 Oct 12

greenscreener says...

waggyonthewing wrote:
if sherwood wants the job he,s gonna have to stand up and tell spurs where to get off,there wont be alot they could do about it,or is it all down to money and greed again!!personally i would like to give keith hill a chance,he,s done his apprenticeship in the lower leagues(worked wonders really)and deserves a chance,saying all that i would also be happy with sherwood.c,mon rovers get it sorted!!
Doesn't Sherwood have an agent ?
[quote][p][bold]waggyonthewing[/bold] wrote: if sherwood wants the job he,s gonna have to stand up and tell spurs where to get off,there wont be alot they could do about it,or is it all down to money and greed again!!personally i would like to give keith hill a chance,he,s done his apprenticeship in the lower leagues(worked wonders really)and deserves a chance,saying all that i would also be happy with sherwood.c,mon rovers get it sorted!![/p][/quote]Doesn't Sherwood have an agent ? greenscreener

12:21pm Wed 17 Oct 12

Dukes says...

Sherwood lets move on from him shebby get a life and move on from him and get a experience manager in.
Sherwood lets move on from him shebby get a life and move on from him and get a experience manager in. Dukes

12:26pm Wed 17 Oct 12

davemal says...

They wanted a manager in by Satyrday, at this rate they'll be lucky to have a manager in by Christmas.
They wanted a manager in by Satyrday, at this rate they'll be lucky to have a manager in by Christmas. davemal

12:31pm Wed 17 Oct 12

Rovers1975 says...

FannyTickler wrote:
Keep lowering your sights. You'll be wishing you still had Kean...
What a silly billy
[quote][p][bold]FannyTickler[/bold] wrote: Keep lowering your sights. You'll be wishing you still had Kean...[/p][/quote]What a silly billy Rovers1975

12:34pm Wed 17 Oct 12

Riverside 7 says...

If Spurs wont let us speak to Sherwood and he won't walk out on them, then we've got to accept it and move on.

We should find out if OGS really wants to come to Ewood.

If he does, I'm sure that he would be worth the wait.
If Spurs wont let us speak to Sherwood and he won't walk out on them, then we've got to accept it and move on. We should find out if OGS really wants to come to Ewood. If he does, I'm sure that he would be worth the wait. Riverside 7

12:36pm Wed 17 Oct 12

int_football_brilliant says...

Sherwood won't force a move as he won't want to burn any bridges with Spurs...it's his safety net if it goes wrong at rovers
Sherwood won't force a move as he won't want to burn any bridges with Spurs...it's his safety net if it goes wrong at rovers int_football_brilliant

12:36pm Wed 17 Oct 12

Harwoodstblue says...

Bazzer wrote:
Is Eckersley playing? wrote:
We can't have it all ways. There has been complaints that they are looking for someone cheap. I am not particularly imbued with Sherwood but there's no doubt he wouldn't come cheap, either in compensation or wages. Yet it seems they won't give up the chase. Let's face it, they can't suit everbody with their choice and its not a decison I'd like to make. I fancy big Sam would still be here but for Venkys apalling, hasty decision. Now they are reaping the whirlwind. I'm just going to sit back now and await the decision. But if they get it wrong they might as well sell up....there won't be another chance!
Of course the decision to sack Big Sam is going to reverberate for many years to come. In that one swinging of the axe this club was cast into the wilderness. It was a diabolical business decision very badly executed, leaving a bad taste in the mouth. It was also the most stupid footballing decision, albeit applauded by some, particularly on here.
The reputation and position of Blackburn Rovers still hurtles downwards.
Excellent post and I agree with every word.
[quote][p][bold]Bazzer[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Is Eckersley playing?[/bold] wrote: We can't have it all ways. There has been complaints that they are looking for someone cheap. I am not particularly imbued with Sherwood but there's no doubt he wouldn't come cheap, either in compensation or wages. Yet it seems they won't give up the chase. Let's face it, they can't suit everbody with their choice and its not a decison I'd like to make. I fancy big Sam would still be here but for Venkys apalling, hasty decision. Now they are reaping the whirlwind. I'm just going to sit back now and await the decision. But if they get it wrong they might as well sell up....there won't be another chance![/p][/quote]Of course the decision to sack Big Sam is going to reverberate for many years to come. In that one swinging of the axe this club was cast into the wilderness. It was a diabolical business decision very badly executed, leaving a bad taste in the mouth. It was also the most stupid footballing decision, albeit applauded by some, particularly on here. The reputation and position of Blackburn Rovers still hurtles downwards.[/p][/quote]Excellent post and I agree with every word. Harwoodstblue

12:38pm Wed 17 Oct 12

leitchy says...

Stone Island: wrote:
Good. Sherwood isn't the man for the job anyway. Haven't we learned our lesson over the years? Let the next Alex Fergusons of the world practice at some other club! FFS, GO FOR SOMEONE WHO HAS DONE THE JOB BEFORE! Not rocket science, is it?
EXACTLY...Get a manager for a managers job, bring in coaches to coach and players to f**king play!!!! It's not difficult !!
[quote][p][bold]Stone Island:[/bold] wrote: Good. Sherwood isn't the man for the job anyway. Haven't we learned our lesson over the years? Let the next Alex Fergusons of the world practice at some other club! FFS, GO FOR SOMEONE WHO HAS DONE THE JOB BEFORE! Not rocket science, is it?[/p][/quote]EXACTLY...Get a manager for a managers job, bring in coaches to coach and players to f**king play!!!! It's not difficult !! leitchy

12:41pm Wed 17 Oct 12

gpb501 says...

Rumour mill has Steve kean as a favourite to take on the Scotland job when Levine has been sacked.

Are Scotland that desperate lol!
Rumour mill has Steve kean as a favourite to take on the Scotland job when Levine has been sacked. Are Scotland that desperate lol! gpb501

12:46pm Wed 17 Oct 12

Rovers 1495 says...

Might as well ask Kitman to come back
Might as well ask Kitman to come back Rovers 1495

12:51pm Wed 17 Oct 12

Rovers 1495 says...

Bottom line is Black is in for Derby game. B*llocks
Bottom line is Black is in for Derby game. B*llocks Rovers 1495

12:52pm Wed 17 Oct 12

gleechy says...

Well, to all the give Venks a chance they have been naieve, and they are learning, absolute bull poop.

The fans are the longest serving positive the club has. Do they care about what the fans think - do they heck.

They can stick stupid singh where the sun don't shine and loose the hangers on before any re building can start.

Any one who has followed this breakup can see the problem, it's just very difficult to admit we all just stood there and watched it happen. It doesn't really matter who the manager is he will just be the excuse maker for the unhealthy owners.

Get the owner/s out.
Well, to all the give Venks a chance they have been naieve, and they are learning, absolute bull poop. The fans are the longest serving positive the club has. Do they care about what the fans think - do they heck. They can stick stupid singh where the sun don't shine and loose the hangers on before any re building can start. Any one who has followed this breakup can see the problem, it's just very difficult to admit we all just stood there and watched it happen. It doesn't really matter who the manager is he will just be the excuse maker for the unhealthy owners. Get the owner/s out. gleechy

12:55pm Wed 17 Oct 12

RespectTheK-Dog says...

roversjeff wrote:
Get your act together Venky's! How long is this saga going on for? Interview someone and appoint someone this week. The longer you idiots leave it the further down the table we will go!
Yet another fan demanding a rush job appointment. Wouldn't you rather they took their time and got the right man than immediately appointing someone that was wrong for the club?

And as you are so worried about slipping down the table under Eric Black - well I thought nobody could do worse than Steve Kean?

Admit it - Kean is better than Black. you all forced a good out of his job.
[quote][p][bold]roversjeff[/bold] wrote: Get your act together Venky's! How long is this saga going on for? Interview someone and appoint someone this week. The longer you idiots leave it the further down the table we will go![/p][/quote]Yet another fan demanding a rush job appointment. Wouldn't you rather they took their time and got the right man than immediately appointing someone that was wrong for the club? And as you are so worried about slipping down the table under Eric Black - well I thought nobody could do worse than Steve Kean? Admit it - Kean is better than Black. you all forced a good out of his job. RespectTheK-Dog

12:56pm Wed 17 Oct 12

carlmc1 says...

When Rovers stated that Samba was not for sale last year it was pretty obvious that he would get his move. He stated that he wanted to move on and move on he did. He stated that he could not promise to give his all for the club anymore. In situations like that, a club cannot hang on to an unhappy player.

If Sherwood wants the job badly enough, he can simply let it be known. He is also quite capable of resigning his post and then talk to Rovers of his own free accord. If he is certain that the job is his if we wants it, then that is all he needs to do. In effect he did force his move from Rovers to Spurs as a player, when Eric Hall his agent at the time promised to double his money. The shoe is on the other foot now, so Tim if you want the job, resign from Spurs.

Whether he is the right man for the job or not, only time will tell. When we hired Howard Kendall all those years ago, he was a novice manager. Despite that he took us from the old Third Division as champions in his first season to within goal difference of promotion, to the top flight, all on a shoestring. He went on to manage Everton to the championship, so a novice can some good!
When Rovers stated that Samba was not for sale last year it was pretty obvious that he would get his move. He stated that he wanted to move on and move on he did. He stated that he could not promise to give his all for the club anymore. In situations like that, a club cannot hang on to an unhappy player. If Sherwood wants the job badly enough, he can simply let it be known. He is also quite capable of resigning his post and then talk to Rovers of his own free accord. If he is certain that the job is his if we wants it, then that is all he needs to do. In effect he did force his move from Rovers to Spurs as a player, when Eric Hall his agent at the time promised to double his money. The shoe is on the other foot now, so Tim if you want the job, resign from Spurs. Whether he is the right man for the job or not, only time will tell. When we hired Howard Kendall all those years ago, he was a novice manager. Despite that he took us from the old Third Division as champions in his first season to within goal difference of promotion, to the top flight, all on a shoestring. He went on to manage Everton to the championship, so a novice can some good! carlmc1

12:59pm Wed 17 Oct 12

RespectTheK-Dog says...

Riverside 7 wrote:
If Spurs wont let us speak to Sherwood and he won't walk out on them, then we've got to accept it and move on.

We should find out if OGS really wants to come to Ewood.

If he does, I'm sure that he would be worth the wait.
Of course Spurs will let you speak to Sherwood.

Daniel Levy is merely showing the chicken farmers how to conduct business.

Pretending they are so desperate to keep him - and you all fall for it - when AvB has already indicated he doesn't like him or even want him around the club!

Spurs don't even rate Sherwood. And I'm stumped if I can see why anyone else would either.
[quote][p][bold]Riverside 7[/bold] wrote: If Spurs wont let us speak to Sherwood and he won't walk out on them, then we've got to accept it and move on. We should find out if OGS really wants to come to Ewood. If he does, I'm sure that he would be worth the wait.[/p][/quote]Of course Spurs will let you speak to Sherwood. Daniel Levy is merely showing the chicken farmers how to conduct business. Pretending they are so desperate to keep him - and you all fall for it - when AvB has already indicated he doesn't like him or even want him around the club! Spurs don't even rate Sherwood. And I'm stumped if I can see why anyone else would either. RespectTheK-Dog

1:10pm Wed 17 Oct 12

Rovers1975 says...

RespectTheK-Dog wrote:
roversjeff wrote:
Get your act together Venky's! How long is this saga going on for? Interview someone and appoint someone this week. The longer you idiots leave it the further down the table we will go!
Yet another fan demanding a rush job appointment. Wouldn't you rather they took their time and got the right man than immediately appointing someone that was wrong for the club?

And as you are so worried about slipping down the table under Eric Black - well I thought nobody could do worse than Steve Kean?

Admit it - Kean is better than Black. you all forced a good out of his job.
Why are you still posting absolute tosh on here? Black can't possibly be as bad a manager as Kean. Apart from being an abysmal manager, Kean is a bare faced liar who lives in some sort of fantasy world he's a good manager. He manipulated his way into a job he had no right to have even been considered for and is not and never will be a decent manager in professional football. That said Black is not the man for the job either and like most human beings would not put up with the absolute bombardment of abuse Kean received because just for financial benefit and pig ignorance. Posting sh1t for a reaction suggests to me you've not much going on Dog, so go and wash your hair and paint your nails puff pants.
[quote][p][bold]RespectTheK-Dog[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]roversjeff[/bold] wrote: Get your act together Venky's! How long is this saga going on for? Interview someone and appoint someone this week. The longer you idiots leave it the further down the table we will go![/p][/quote]Yet another fan demanding a rush job appointment. Wouldn't you rather they took their time and got the right man than immediately appointing someone that was wrong for the club? And as you are so worried about slipping down the table under Eric Black - well I thought nobody could do worse than Steve Kean? Admit it - Kean is better than Black. you all forced a good out of his job.[/p][/quote]Why are you still posting absolute tosh on here? Black can't possibly be as bad a manager as Kean. Apart from being an abysmal manager, Kean is a bare faced liar who lives in some sort of fantasy world he's a good manager. He manipulated his way into a job he had no right to have even been considered for and is not and never will be a decent manager in professional football. That said Black is not the man for the job either and like most human beings would not put up with the absolute bombardment of abuse Kean received because just for financial benefit and pig ignorance. Posting sh1t for a reaction suggests to me you've not much going on Dog, so go and wash your hair and paint your nails puff pants. Rovers1975

1:17pm Wed 17 Oct 12

bigste says...

Shearer and Newell. The latter will take no crap from the owners and does have some experience. Can't see Venky's paying for two or anyone that will stand up to them.
Shearer and Newell. The latter will take no crap from the owners and does have some experience. Can't see Venky's paying for two or anyone that will stand up to them. bigste

1:18pm Wed 17 Oct 12

1riversider says...

Not sure about Sherwood, unless he had an experienced number 2 alongside him. However, if Spurs won't let us talk to him, and he won't engineer the move, then it it is dead in the water, and time to move on.

Doubtless SS and the other Stooges don't understand this, since they have zero knowledge of how football works, no plan B, and so the farce goes on! Any one care to bet on Black as team manager, and SS as Director of Football? The ultimate nightmare scenario is looming.

SHYSTERS GET OUT OF OUR CLUB NOW
Not sure about Sherwood, unless he had an experienced number 2 alongside him. However, if Spurs won't let us talk to him, and he won't engineer the move, then it it is dead in the water, and time to move on. Doubtless SS and the other Stooges don't understand this, since they have zero knowledge of how football works, no plan B, and so the farce goes on! Any one care to bet on Black as team manager, and SS as Director of Football? The ultimate nightmare scenario is looming. SHYSTERS GET OUT OF OUR CLUB NOW 1riversider

1:21pm Wed 17 Oct 12

Harwoodstblue says...

RespectTheK-Dog wrote:
Riverside 7 wrote:
If Spurs wont let us speak to Sherwood and he won't walk out on them, then we've got to accept it and move on.

We should find out if OGS really wants to come to Ewood.

If he does, I'm sure that he would be worth the wait.
Of course Spurs will let you speak to Sherwood.

Daniel Levy is merely showing the chicken farmers how to conduct business.

Pretending they are so desperate to keep him - and you all fall for it - when AvB has already indicated he doesn't like him or even want him around the club!

Spurs don't even rate Sherwood. And I'm stumped if I can see why anyone else would either.
I think you'll, find that 95% of people on here agree with your last sentence, so you are telling us nothing really.
[quote][p][bold]RespectTheK-Dog[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Riverside 7[/bold] wrote: If Spurs wont let us speak to Sherwood and he won't walk out on them, then we've got to accept it and move on. We should find out if OGS really wants to come to Ewood. If he does, I'm sure that he would be worth the wait.[/p][/quote]Of course Spurs will let you speak to Sherwood. Daniel Levy is merely showing the chicken farmers how to conduct business. Pretending they are so desperate to keep him - and you all fall for it - when AvB has already indicated he doesn't like him or even want him around the club! Spurs don't even rate Sherwood. And I'm stumped if I can see why anyone else would either.[/p][/quote]I think you'll, find that 95% of people on here agree with your last sentence, so you are telling us nothing really. Harwoodstblue

1:22pm Wed 17 Oct 12

int_football_brilliant says...

i can remember how efficient the previous board were at sorting this kind of thing out. Didn't rush, but did everything correctly and pinpointed who they wanted, and then simply got them! souness, hughes, even ince, the allerdyce
i can remember how efficient the previous board were at sorting this kind of thing out. Didn't rush, but did everything correctly and pinpointed who they wanted, and then simply got them! souness, hughes, even ince, the allerdyce int_football_brilliant

1:25pm Wed 17 Oct 12

glp says...

Roll up! Roll up! the Venkys Circus continues down at Ewood Park. Clueless owners, useless management and coaching staff, unfit players. Sorry but I will be returning until this Clown Show leaves town and give us back our once wonderful Football Club. Sorry Uncle Jack your pride and joy as been destroyed by this bunch of totally inept chicken farmers
Roll up! Roll up! the Venkys Circus continues down at Ewood Park. Clueless owners, useless management and coaching staff, unfit players. Sorry but I will be returning until this Clown Show leaves town and give us back our once wonderful Football Club. Sorry Uncle Jack your pride and joy as been destroyed by this bunch of totally inept chicken farmers glp

1:26pm Wed 17 Oct 12

PpMac says...

there are a million and one candidates out there ready for the job...Tim Sherwood would be a risk...a good risk, but never-the-less a risk. Perhaps he also thinks this as well as all it takes is for Sherwood to seek permission to talk to Rovers, but he ain't done that, so Shebby, get ur bloody finger out and go for someone who IS interested.
there are a million and one candidates out there ready for the job...Tim Sherwood would be a risk...a good risk, but never-the-less a risk. Perhaps he also thinks this as well as all it takes is for Sherwood to seek permission to talk to Rovers, but he ain't done that, so Shebby, get ur bloody finger out and go for someone who IS interested. PpMac

1:34pm Wed 17 Oct 12

glp says...

Roll up! Roll up! the Venkys Circus continues down at Ewood Park. Clueless owners, useless management and coaching staff, unfit players. Sorry but I will not be returning until this Clown Show leaves town and give us back our once wonderful Football Club. Sorry Uncle Jack your pride and joy as been destroyed by this bunch of totally inept chicken farmers”
Roll up! Roll up! the Venkys Circus continues down at Ewood Park. Clueless owners, useless management and coaching staff, unfit players. Sorry but I will not be returning until this Clown Show leaves town and give us back our once wonderful Football Club. Sorry Uncle Jack your pride and joy as been destroyed by this bunch of totally inept chicken farmers” glp

1:35pm Wed 17 Oct 12

Tamworth rover says...

RespectTheK-Dog wrote:
Riverside 7 wrote:
If Spurs wont let us speak to Sherwood and he won't walk out on them, then we've got to accept it and move on.

We should find out if OGS really wants to come to Ewood.

If he does, I'm sure that he would be worth the wait.
Of course Spurs will let you speak to Sherwood.

Daniel Levy is merely showing the chicken farmers how to conduct business.

Pretending they are so desperate to keep him - and you all fall for it - when AvB has already indicated he doesn't like him or even want him around the club!

Spurs don't even rate Sherwood. And I'm stumped if I can see why anyone else would either.
Wrong on so many levels. The reason AVB doesnt want him at the club is down to the fact that he has more respect from all players and staff at the football club and its showing him up. How can you say spurs dont even rate him when Levy wants him to become the director of football at the club and thats why hes refusing to let him speak to us plus 80% of the back room coatching staff would also be leaving to come to us if Sherwood was appointed manager, Which would cause huge problems at Spurs and unsettle players etc.

For me Sherwood would be a much better addition then the likes of Black,Holloway, McCarthy and Shearer
[quote][p][bold]RespectTheK-Dog[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Riverside 7[/bold] wrote: If Spurs wont let us speak to Sherwood and he won't walk out on them, then we've got to accept it and move on. We should find out if OGS really wants to come to Ewood. If he does, I'm sure that he would be worth the wait.[/p][/quote]Of course Spurs will let you speak to Sherwood. Daniel Levy is merely showing the chicken farmers how to conduct business. Pretending they are so desperate to keep him - and you all fall for it - when AvB has already indicated he doesn't like him or even want him around the club! Spurs don't even rate Sherwood. And I'm stumped if I can see why anyone else would either.[/p][/quote]Wrong on so many levels. The reason AVB doesnt want him at the club is down to the fact that he has more respect from all players and staff at the football club and its showing him up. How can you say spurs dont even rate him when Levy wants him to become the director of football at the club and thats why hes refusing to let him speak to us plus 80% of the back room coatching staff would also be leaving to come to us if Sherwood was appointed manager, Which would cause huge problems at Spurs and unsettle players etc. For me Sherwood would be a much better addition then the likes of Black,Holloway, McCarthy and Shearer Tamworth rover

1:41pm Wed 17 Oct 12

Rover Pete says...

All these delays are to try to give Black time to win a game. They can then go for a him as he is a very, very, cheap option.
An ideal outome for Venky's.
It will mean League 1 for Rovers, of course, but Venky's are a funny lot.
West Ham are where Rovers would be now if they had kept Sam.
All this madness could have been avoided wih a bit of common sense when Venky's bought the club.
Onwards and downwards!
All these delays are to try to give Black time to win a game. They can then go for a him as he is a very, very, cheap option. An ideal outome for Venky's. It will mean League 1 for Rovers, of course, but Venky's are a funny lot. West Ham are where Rovers would be now if they had kept Sam. All this madness could have been avoided wih a bit of common sense when Venky's bought the club. Onwards and downwards! Rover Pete

1:44pm Wed 17 Oct 12

glp says...

from sky sports

David Goodwillie has cut short a loan spell at Crystal Palace and returned to Blackburn Rovers after struggling to settle in London.

Goodwillie linked up with Palace on transfer deadline day in an agreement which was due to run until January.

However, the 23-year-old has opted to head back to his parent employers ahead of schedule.

Goodwillie made just one substitute appearance during his time at Selhurst Park after finding it difficult to acclimatise to life in the capital.

"David Goodwillie has agreed to go back to Blackburn Rovers as he's struggled to settle in London," Crystal Palace assistant manager Lennie Lawrence told the Croydon Advertiser.

"It was in everybody's best interests that he went back, so that's happened.

"He just couldn't settle and it's just one of those things."
from sky sports David Goodwillie has cut short a loan spell at Crystal Palace and returned to Blackburn Rovers after struggling to settle in London. Goodwillie linked up with Palace on transfer deadline day in an agreement which was due to run until January. However, the 23-year-old has opted to head back to his parent employers ahead of schedule. Goodwillie made just one substitute appearance during his time at Selhurst Park after finding it difficult to acclimatise to life in the capital. "David Goodwillie has agreed to go back to Blackburn Rovers as he's struggled to settle in London," Crystal Palace assistant manager Lennie Lawrence told the Croydon Advertiser. "It was in everybody's best interests that he went back, so that's happened. "He just couldn't settle and it's just one of those things." glp

1:44pm Wed 17 Oct 12

glp says...

from sky sports

David Goodwillie has cut short a loan spell at Crystal Palace and returned to Blackburn Rovers after struggling to settle in London.

Goodwillie linked up with Palace on transfer deadline day in an agreement which was due to run until January.

However, the 23-year-old has opted to head back to his parent employers ahead of schedule.

Goodwillie made just one substitute appearance during his time at Selhurst Park after finding it difficult to acclimatise to life in the capital.

"David Goodwillie has agreed to go back to Blackburn Rovers as he's struggled to settle in London," Crystal Palace assistant manager Lennie Lawrence told the Croydon Advertiser.

"It was in everybody's best interests that he went back, so that's happened.

"He just couldn't settle and it's just one of those things."
from sky sports David Goodwillie has cut short a loan spell at Crystal Palace and returned to Blackburn Rovers after struggling to settle in London. Goodwillie linked up with Palace on transfer deadline day in an agreement which was due to run until January. However, the 23-year-old has opted to head back to his parent employers ahead of schedule. Goodwillie made just one substitute appearance during his time at Selhurst Park after finding it difficult to acclimatise to life in the capital. "David Goodwillie has agreed to go back to Blackburn Rovers as he's struggled to settle in London," Crystal Palace assistant manager Lennie Lawrence told the Croydon Advertiser. "It was in everybody's best interests that he went back, so that's happened. "He just couldn't settle and it's just one of those things." glp

1:46pm Wed 17 Oct 12

burnleyglentoran says...

Spurs obviously dont want some, (what was it you lot were calling it 8 months ago? oh yes!) little chumpionship club, distracting the big boys from getting on with business in the Prem!

BRKFC - JUST A LAUGHING STOCK NEAR SHADSWORTH
Spurs obviously dont want some, (what was it you lot were calling it 8 months ago? oh yes!) little chumpionship club, distracting the big boys from getting on with business in the Prem! BRKFC - JUST A LAUGHING STOCK NEAR SHADSWORTH burnleyglentoran

1:49pm Wed 17 Oct 12

Nuttall Street says...

Extensive managerial experience is not a priority! God, these Indians are going to kill Rovers. Managerial experience was not a priority when they sacked BFS and despite the series of disasters since then Venkys have not learned anything. Blackburn are doomed while these arrogant fools own the club.
IT IS TIME NOW FOR AN IMMEDIATE BOYCOTT UNTIL A DECENT PROVEN MANAGER IS APPOINTED or we will be saddled with another useless manager through whom Venkys will manage the team by default. BOYCOTT NOW BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE!
Extensive managerial experience is not a priority! God, these Indians are going to kill Rovers. Managerial experience was not a priority when they sacked BFS and despite the series of disasters since then Venkys have not learned anything. Blackburn are doomed while these arrogant fools own the club. IT IS TIME NOW FOR AN IMMEDIATE BOYCOTT UNTIL A DECENT PROVEN MANAGER IS APPOINTED or we will be saddled with another useless manager through whom Venkys will manage the team by default. BOYCOTT NOW BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE! Nuttall Street

1:49pm Wed 17 Oct 12

Brunzig says...

OGS is the man!! Get it through your thick heads venkys and shebby hes off limits has nil experience and no f!ucker wants him! Get OGS before its to late
OGS is the man!! Get it through your thick heads venkys and shebby hes off limits has nil experience and no f!ucker wants him! Get OGS before its to late Brunzig

1:51pm Wed 17 Oct 12

Harwoodstblue says...

Rover Pete wrote:
All these delays are to try to give Black time to win a game. They can then go for a him as he is a very, very, cheap option.
An ideal outome for Venky's.
It will mean League 1 for Rovers, of course, but Venky's are a funny lot.
West Ham are where Rovers would be now if they had kept Sam.
All this madness could have been avoided wih a bit of common sense when Venky's bought the club.
Onwards and downwards!
What is Venkys agenda ?

They've been here for two years and still nobody knows, but they're certainly showing no ambition from a footballing point of view.
[quote][p][bold]Rover Pete[/bold] wrote: All these delays are to try to give Black time to win a game. They can then go for a him as he is a very, very, cheap option. An ideal outome for Venky's. It will mean League 1 for Rovers, of course, but Venky's are a funny lot. West Ham are where Rovers would be now if they had kept Sam. All this madness could have been avoided wih a bit of common sense when Venky's bought the club. Onwards and downwards![/p][/quote]What is Venkys agenda ? They've been here for two years and still nobody knows, but they're certainly showing no ambition from a footballing point of view. Harwoodstblue

2:21pm Wed 17 Oct 12

eddyo says...

Steve BB2 wrote:
OGS has said he is staying at Molde until at least the end of the season and has distanced himself from a move to any Northwest club.

Sherwood has apparently said he would like to talk to the owners and is meant to be having a meeting with the Rao brothers in Switzerland to discuss things.
Although if this report is correct then he wont be meeting with them after all.

Personally I would like us to pursue Holloway and compensation is likely to be less and he has the experience and ability we need right now.
Somebody told me the Norwegian season finishes in four weeks time - not long to wait if we want him.
[quote][p][bold]Steve BB2[/bold] wrote: OGS has said he is staying at Molde until at least the end of the season and has distanced himself from a move to any Northwest club. Sherwood has apparently said he would like to talk to the owners and is meant to be having a meeting with the Rao brothers in Switzerland to discuss things. Although if this report is correct then he wont be meeting with them after all. Personally I would like us to pursue Holloway and compensation is likely to be less and he has the experience and ability we need right now.[/p][/quote]Somebody told me the Norwegian season finishes in four weeks time - not long to wait if we want him. eddyo

2:23pm Wed 17 Oct 12

wolsty says...

RespectTheK-Dog wrote:
roversjeff wrote:
Get your act together Venky's! How long is this saga going on for? Interview someone and appoint someone this week. The longer you idiots leave it the further down the table we will go!
Yet another fan demanding a rush job appointment. Wouldn't you rather they took their time and got the right man than immediately appointing someone that was wrong for the club?

And as you are so worried about slipping down the table under Eric Black - well I thought nobody could do worse than Steve Kean?

Admit it - Kean is better than Black. you all forced a good out of his job.
you talk some ****
[quote][p][bold]RespectTheK-Dog[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]roversjeff[/bold] wrote: Get your act together Venky's! How long is this saga going on for? Interview someone and appoint someone this week. The longer you idiots leave it the further down the table we will go![/p][/quote]Yet another fan demanding a rush job appointment. Wouldn't you rather they took their time and got the right man than immediately appointing someone that was wrong for the club? And as you are so worried about slipping down the table under Eric Black - well I thought nobody could do worse than Steve Kean? Admit it - Kean is better than Black. you all forced a good out of his job.[/p][/quote]you talk some **** wolsty

2:36pm Wed 17 Oct 12

thommovat says...

burnleyglentoran wrote:
Spurs obviously dont want some, (what was it you lot were calling it 8 months ago? oh yes!) little chumpionship club, distracting the big boys from getting on with business in the Prem! BRKFC - JUST A LAUGHING STOCK NEAR SHADSWORTH
BRFC are still higher up the your lot!!
[quote][p][bold]burnleyglentoran[/bold] wrote: Spurs obviously dont want some, (what was it you lot were calling it 8 months ago? oh yes!) little chumpionship club, distracting the big boys from getting on with business in the Prem! BRKFC - JUST A LAUGHING STOCK NEAR SHADSWORTH[/p][/quote]BRFC are still higher up the your lot!! thommovat

2:38pm Wed 17 Oct 12

thommovat says...

Harwoodstblue wrote:
Rover Pete wrote: All these delays are to try to give Black time to win a game. They can then go for a him as he is a very, very, cheap option. An ideal outome for Venky's. It will mean League 1 for Rovers, of course, but Venky's are a funny lot. West Ham are where Rovers would be now if they had kept Sam. All this madness could have been avoided wih a bit of common sense when Venky's bought the club. Onwards and downwards!
What is Venkys agenda ? They've been here for two years and still nobody knows, but they're certainly showing no ambition from a footballing point of view.
Agreed. Hopefully they will get some decent advice for a change...and sell the club to owners whoboth care and know what they are doing.
[quote][p][bold]Harwoodstblue[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Rover Pete[/bold] wrote: All these delays are to try to give Black time to win a game. They can then go for a him as he is a very, very, cheap option. An ideal outome for Venky's. It will mean League 1 for Rovers, of course, but Venky's are a funny lot. West Ham are where Rovers would be now if they had kept Sam. All this madness could have been avoided wih a bit of common sense when Venky's bought the club. Onwards and downwards![/p][/quote]What is Venkys agenda ? They've been here for two years and still nobody knows, but they're certainly showing no ambition from a footballing point of view.[/p][/quote]Agreed. Hopefully they will get some decent advice for a change...and sell the club to owners whoboth care and know what they are doing. thommovat

2:40pm Wed 17 Oct 12

handsj14 says...

I still firmly believe Sherwood will be in charge perhaps not before Derby but cretainly after.
I still firmly believe Sherwood will be in charge perhaps not before Derby but cretainly after. handsj14

2:41pm Wed 17 Oct 12

kenbro says...

If Shebby does get Sherwood we would have to pay a ransom to Spurs, and give him a 4 year, big money contract. What if he is another Paul Ince ?
In 6 months, if we are at the bottom end of the Championship, it will cost a few more millions to fire him and replace him.
He is totally unproven as a Manager. If he wanted to be one, he could start off in the lower leagues and learn the trade. With the situation at Ewood we can't afford to be a training ground for maybe managers. Failure would be catastrophic.
If Shebby does get Sherwood we would have to pay a ransom to Spurs, and give him a 4 year, big money contract. What if he is another Paul Ince ? In 6 months, if we are at the bottom end of the Championship, it will cost a few more millions to fire him and replace him. He is totally unproven as a Manager. If he wanted to be one, he could start off in the lower leagues and learn the trade. With the situation at Ewood we can't afford to be a training ground for maybe managers. Failure would be catastrophic. kenbro

2:43pm Wed 17 Oct 12

CARover says...

Maybe the list of candidates is not as big as we are led to believe ?

TS is better off at Spurs and Shearer on TV so who does that leave that has the right credentials? Certainly not Black

I would like Holloway but I think he manages his way and not the way someone else would want him to manage unless they are ready or some straight talk look else where

All of SK management supporters are also capable of steering candidates away from this job as they probably do know just how bad this club is now being run but do not say this in public

3 weeks and no decision makes me comfortable that nothing has changed with Venkys, they are slow and unsure and have put themselves in to analysis paralysis, basically they could not pick their nose without a consultant telling them how
Maybe the list of candidates is not as big as we are led to believe ? TS is better off at Spurs and Shearer on TV so who does that leave that has the right credentials? Certainly not Black I would like Holloway but I think he manages his way and not the way someone else would want him to manage unless they are ready or some straight talk look else where All of SK management supporters are also capable of steering candidates away from this job as they probably do know just how bad this club is now being run but do not say this in public 3 weeks and no decision makes me comfortable that nothing has changed with Venkys, they are slow and unsure and have put themselves in to analysis paralysis, basically they could not pick their nose without a consultant telling them how CARover

2:46pm Wed 17 Oct 12

Harwoodstblue says...

kenbro wrote:
If Shebby does get Sherwood we would have to pay a ransom to Spurs, and give him a 4 year, big money contract. What if he is another Paul Ince ?
In 6 months, if we are at the bottom end of the Championship, it will cost a few more millions to fire him and replace him.
He is totally unproven as a Manager. If he wanted to be one, he could start off in the lower leagues and learn the trade. With the situation at Ewood we can't afford to be a training ground for maybe managers. Failure would be catastrophic.
Exactly, but why are Venkys going down this line ?

If it doesn't work out will they have a plan B, or will they be 'confused' again ?
[quote][p][bold]kenbro[/bold] wrote: If Shebby does get Sherwood we would have to pay a ransom to Spurs, and give him a 4 year, big money contract. What if he is another Paul Ince ? In 6 months, if we are at the bottom end of the Championship, it will cost a few more millions to fire him and replace him. He is totally unproven as a Manager. If he wanted to be one, he could start off in the lower leagues and learn the trade. With the situation at Ewood we can't afford to be a training ground for maybe managers. Failure would be catastrophic.[/p][/quote]Exactly, but why are Venkys going down this line ? If it doesn't work out will they have a plan B, or will they be 'confused' again ? Harwoodstblue

2:53pm Wed 17 Oct 12

Rovers 1495 says...

Rearrange these words into well-known phrase

Dead flogging horse a
Rearrange these words into well-known phrase Dead flogging horse a Rovers 1495

2:54pm Wed 17 Oct 12

Rovers1975 says...

burnleyglentoran wrote:
Spurs obviously dont want some, (what was it you lot were calling it 8 months ago? oh yes!) little chumpionship club, distracting the big boys from getting on with business in the Prem!

BRKFC - JUST A LAUGHING STOCK NEAR SHADSWORTH
Oh dear, selective memory syndrome again I see. An average crowd of 10,000 and a manager who's just dropped you like a piece of sh1t for a lower league club? Now that's what I call a laughing stock.
[quote][p][bold]burnleyglentoran[/bold] wrote: Spurs obviously dont want some, (what was it you lot were calling it 8 months ago? oh yes!) little chumpionship club, distracting the big boys from getting on with business in the Prem! BRKFC - JUST A LAUGHING STOCK NEAR SHADSWORTH[/p][/quote]Oh dear, selective memory syndrome again I see. An average crowd of 10,000 and a manager who's just dropped you like a piece of sh1t for a lower league club? Now that's what I call a laughing stock. Rovers1975

3:01pm Wed 17 Oct 12

bburnrover says...

Ole Gunnar is worth the wait till November.
Ole Gunnar is worth the wait till November. bburnrover

3:27pm Wed 17 Oct 12

RUinsane says...

C'mpn Shaggy, move on, Sherwoods not worth 2 million a year and a big compo payment to spuds, he has no track record in management.
Either wait for Ole gunnar or go in for Simon Grayson, ian Holloway or someone of that ilk. Don't bother with Bananaman Mcarthy though, let the Dingles get Mr personality
C'mpn Shaggy, move on, Sherwoods not worth 2 million a year and a big compo payment to spuds, he has no track record in management. Either wait for Ole gunnar or go in for Simon Grayson, ian Holloway or someone of that ilk. Don't bother with Bananaman Mcarthy though, let the Dingles get Mr personality RUinsane

4:02pm Wed 17 Oct 12

A Darener says...

Sorry folks, but we can come on here until the cows come home but there is only going to be one outcome...the futures bleak, the futures Black!
Sorry folks, but we can come on here until the cows come home but there is only going to be one outcome...the futures bleak, the futures Black! A Darener

4:05pm Wed 17 Oct 12

eddyo says...

Rovers 1495 wrote:
Rearrange these words into well-known phrase

Dead flogging horse a
'Dead flogging horse a'
*
David Dunn ?
[quote][p][bold]Rovers 1495[/bold] wrote: Rearrange these words into well-known phrase Dead flogging horse a[/p][/quote]'Dead flogging horse a' * David Dunn ? eddyo

4:36pm Wed 17 Oct 12

Rover82 says...

This could be an ideal situation for Venkys, they save a big compo payout for Sherwood and also avoid angering a significant number of fans by hiring an unproven manager. In return they can get Holloway, cheap at £500,000 reported fee and a proven manager that the majority of fans would welcome. The issue is Shebby can't boss Holloway around and so isn't keen. The "football!" men at the club (whether you respect them or not in Shaw etc) want experience and are pushing for IH . I say either go and get Holloway, who according to Andy Cryer would come or sign up OGS and be open with the fans that we have to wait until November for him to arrive. NOT Black
This could be an ideal situation for Venkys, they save a big compo payout for Sherwood and also avoid angering a significant number of fans by hiring an unproven manager. In return they can get Holloway, cheap at £500,000 reported fee and a proven manager that the majority of fans would welcome. The issue is Shebby can't boss Holloway around and so isn't keen. The "football!" men at the club (whether you respect them or not in Shaw etc) want experience and are pushing for IH . I say either go and get Holloway, who according to Andy Cryer would come or sign up OGS and be open with the fans that we have to wait until November for him to arrive. NOT Black Rover82

5:00pm Wed 17 Oct 12

merlinrabbit says...

A slight improvement in that an approach has been made. Last time they didnt bother looking beyond the kitroom
A slight improvement in that an approach has been made. Last time they didnt bother looking beyond the kitroom merlinrabbit

5:19pm Wed 17 Oct 12

stick to football says...

If Sherwood had been convinced he would have made it happen just like he made his transfer to Spurs happen

Now move on Shebby otherwise you will make Venkys look decisive!!
If Sherwood had been convinced he would have made it happen just like he made his transfer to Spurs happen Now move on Shebby otherwise you will make Venkys look decisive!! stick to football

5:20pm Wed 17 Oct 12

dangerous dave says...

When will they learn the 'Shabby Lot' - Sherwood is not wanted and is not the man for the job - experience is what we want with a good up front honest attitude which is something that Singh and Venkeys don not possess!!!!!
OUT WITH SHAW AGNEW BLACK HENDRY SINGH VENKEYS
When will they learn the 'Shabby Lot' - Sherwood is not wanted and is not the man for the job - experience is what we want with a good up front honest attitude which is something that Singh and Venkeys don not possess!!!!! OUT WITH SHAW AGNEW BLACK HENDRY SINGH VENKEYS dangerous dave

5:21pm Wed 17 Oct 12

trueblue72 says...

gpb501 wrote:
Rumour mill has Steve kean as a favourite to take on the Scotland job when Levine has been sacked.

Are Scotland that desperate lol!
I heard Alan brazil choke on his weetabix this am when domeone mentioned keanes name as a candidate for the Scotland job if Levine gets sacked.
His silence said it all.

He wasn't that quiet when we wanted keane out, what goes around comes around !!!
[quote][p][bold]gpb501[/bold] wrote: Rumour mill has Steve kean as a favourite to take on the Scotland job when Levine has been sacked. Are Scotland that desperate lol![/p][/quote]I heard Alan brazil choke on his weetabix this am when domeone mentioned keanes name as a candidate for the Scotland job if Levine gets sacked. His silence said it all. He wasn't that quiet when we wanted keane out, what goes around comes around !!! trueblue72

5:35pm Wed 17 Oct 12

blueblooded says...

theres more dingles posting here than on there own articles. unsurprising really. League one wannabes cant understand Howe it all went wrong for them.. whose your current manager and where are you in the table remind me?

Exactly.
theres more dingles posting here than on there own articles. unsurprising really. League one wannabes cant understand Howe it all went wrong for them.. whose your current manager and where are you in the table remind me? Exactly. blueblooded

5:35pm Wed 17 Oct 12

French Rover says...

Tamworth rover wrote:
RespectTheK-Dog wrote:
Riverside 7 wrote:
If Spurs wont let us speak to Sherwood and he won't walk out on them, then we've got to accept it and move on.

We should find out if OGS really wants to come to Ewood.

If he does, I'm sure that he would be worth the wait.
Of course Spurs will let you speak to Sherwood.

Daniel Levy is merely showing the chicken farmers how to conduct business.

Pretending they are so desperate to keep him - and you all fall for it - when AvB has already indicated he doesn't like him or even want him around the club!

Spurs don't even rate Sherwood. And I'm stumped if I can see why anyone else would either.
Wrong on so many levels. The reason AVB doesnt want him at the club is down to the fact that he has more respect from all players and staff at the football club and its showing him up. How can you say spurs dont even rate him when Levy wants him to become the director of football at the club and thats why hes refusing to let him speak to us plus 80% of the back room coatching staff would also be leaving to come to us if Sherwood was appointed manager, Which would cause huge problems at Spurs and unsettle players etc.

For me Sherwood would be a much better addition then the likes of Black,Holloway, McCarthy and Shearer
Agree with the post - Levy likes him and wants him to stay but AVB wants his own appointment - but I think Levy will relent if Spurs get the right level of compensation money.Three million was mentioned last week so guess that it's that figure which is the key that opens the door for Tim.
Just need our owners to show some intent (and cash) and sort that out ASAP now.
[quote][p][bold]Tamworth rover[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]RespectTheK-Dog[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Riverside 7[/bold] wrote: If Spurs wont let us speak to Sherwood and he won't walk out on them, then we've got to accept it and move on. We should find out if OGS really wants to come to Ewood. If he does, I'm sure that he would be worth the wait.[/p][/quote]Of course Spurs will let you speak to Sherwood. Daniel Levy is merely showing the chicken farmers how to conduct business. Pretending they are so desperate to keep him - and you all fall for it - when AvB has already indicated he doesn't like him or even want him around the club! Spurs don't even rate Sherwood. And I'm stumped if I can see why anyone else would either.[/p][/quote]Wrong on so many levels. The reason AVB doesnt want him at the club is down to the fact that he has more respect from all players and staff at the football club and its showing him up. How can you say spurs dont even rate him when Levy wants him to become the director of football at the club and thats why hes refusing to let him speak to us plus 80% of the back room coatching staff would also be leaving to come to us if Sherwood was appointed manager, Which would cause huge problems at Spurs and unsettle players etc. For me Sherwood would be a much better addition then the likes of Black,Holloway, McCarthy and Shearer[/p][/quote]Agree with the post - Levy likes him and wants him to stay but AVB wants his own appointment - but I think Levy will relent if Spurs get the right level of compensation money.Three million was mentioned last week so guess that it's that figure which is the key that opens the door for Tim. Just need our owners to show some intent (and cash) and sort that out ASAP now. French Rover

5:55pm Wed 17 Oct 12

bburnrover says...

Well who gives one about Sherwood what has he ever done in management? Do you all feel Shebby knows anything about football and management? I would personally not go near anyone that Shebby likes as he is just another Charlie Chaplin trying to make a name for himself.Please could someone explain why a provincial club based in east Lancashire require a Global Adviser? We should go for either a big name or a young hungry manager with a good track record and who knows the game backward.
Well who gives one about Sherwood what has he ever done in management? Do you all feel Shebby knows anything about football and management? I would personally not go near anyone that Shebby likes as he is just another Charlie Chaplin trying to make a name for himself.Please could someone explain why a provincial club based in east Lancashire require a Global Adviser? We should go for either a big name or a young hungry manager with a good track record and who knows the game backward. bburnrover

6:31pm Wed 17 Oct 12

Lancs - pensioner says...

J.C - Rishton wrote:
earwego wrote:
Black it is then. The farce continues.
I have a horrible feeling you will be right.

Unless Sherwood forces the issue with Spurs and they relent and let him talk to Rovers (which is still possible as DL is known as a very hard negociator).

If Rovers turn their attention to IH I can see Blackpool also refusing us permission to speak to him - then Rovers will win one of our next 2 games and hey presto, slam dunk, Black will be appointed within 36 hours of us scaping a 1 0 win against some no hoper team.
You may be right JC but the owners know another farce and the Boycott starts again, we are the customer and if we don't like the product we don't buy it, full stop!
If they want 12000 a fortnight then let them have there YES man.
[quote][p][bold]J.C - Rishton[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]earwego[/bold] wrote: Black it is then. The farce continues.[/p][/quote]I have a horrible feeling you will be right. Unless Sherwood forces the issue with Spurs and they relent and let him talk to Rovers (which is still possible as DL is known as a very hard negociator). If Rovers turn their attention to IH I can see Blackpool also refusing us permission to speak to him - then Rovers will win one of our next 2 games and hey presto, slam dunk, Black will be appointed within 36 hours of us scaping a 1 0 win against some no hoper team.[/p][/quote]You may be right JC but the owners know another farce and the Boycott starts again, we are the customer and if we don't like the product we don't buy it, full stop! If they want 12000 a fortnight then let them have there YES man. Lancs - pensioner

6:34pm Wed 17 Oct 12

jogalot says...

bburnrover wrote:
Well who gives one about Sherwood what has he ever done in management? Do you all feel Shebby knows anything about football and management? I would personally not go near anyone that Shebby likes as he is just another Charlie Chaplin trying to make a name for himself.Please could someone explain why a provincial club based in east Lancashire require a Global Adviser? We should go for either a big name or a young hungry manager with a good track record and who knows the game backward.
Agreed although if Sherwood came, I'd get behind him but 3 weeks and they haven't sorted it is ridiculous. They should move on but the Global Advisor must have ulterior motives for not doing so. All names mentioned have more experience than Sherwood but experience is apparently not a priority...

There's just the £8million paid for Rhodes that keeps me hanging on to the hope that they will make a good appointment. Everything else points to it being more of the same stupidity. There was a light at the end of the tunnel when Kean went but now it's looking increasingly Black. :-((((
[quote][p][bold]bburnrover[/bold] wrote: Well who gives one about Sherwood what has he ever done in management? Do you all feel Shebby knows anything about football and management? I would personally not go near anyone that Shebby likes as he is just another Charlie Chaplin trying to make a name for himself.Please could someone explain why a provincial club based in east Lancashire require a Global Adviser? We should go for either a big name or a young hungry manager with a good track record and who knows the game backward.[/p][/quote]Agreed although if Sherwood came, I'd get behind him but 3 weeks and they haven't sorted it is ridiculous. They should move on but the Global Advisor must have ulterior motives for not doing so. All names mentioned have more experience than Sherwood but experience is apparently not a priority... There's just the £8million paid for Rhodes that keeps me hanging on to the hope that they will make a good appointment. Everything else points to it being more of the same stupidity. There was a light at the end of the tunnel when Kean went but now it's looking increasingly Black. :-(((( jogalot

6:36pm Wed 17 Oct 12

Forever-Blue says...

Dougie Freedman from Palace or Flitcroft from Chorley thats it guys.

This lot make noises like they give one and then hire a cheap option and blame it on Spurs. Dont discount Black either, especially if we win at Derby.

Whats wrong with Holloway ffs. The whole dire 20+ months has been a nightmare that looks like it will not end any time soon. :-(
Dougie Freedman from Palace or Flitcroft from Chorley thats it guys. This lot make noises like they give one and then hire a cheap option and blame it on Spurs. Dont discount Black either, especially if we win at Derby. Whats wrong with Holloway ffs. The whole dire 20+ months has been a nightmare that looks like it will not end any time soon. :-( Forever-Blue

6:40pm Wed 17 Oct 12

CheltRover says...

Bazzer wrote:
Is Eckersley playing? wrote:
We can't have it all ways. There has been complaints that they are looking for someone cheap. I am not particularly imbued with Sherwood but there's no doubt he wouldn't come cheap, either in compensation or wages. Yet it seems they won't give up the chase. Let's face it, they can't suit everbody with their choice and its not a decison I'd like to make. I fancy big Sam would still be here but for Venkys apalling, hasty decision. Now they are reaping the whirlwind. I'm just going to sit back now and await the decision. But if they get it wrong they might as well sell up....there won't be another chance!
Of course the decision to sack Big Sam is going to reverberate for many years to come. In that one swinging of the axe this club was cast into the wilderness. It was a diabolical business decision very badly executed, leaving a bad taste in the mouth. It was also the most stupid footballing decision, albeit applauded by some, particularly on here.
The reputation and position of Blackburn Rovers still hurtles downwards.
Getting rid of big Sam wasn't as bad a mistake as appointing kean
[quote][p][bold]Bazzer[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Is Eckersley playing?[/bold] wrote: We can't have it all ways. There has been complaints that they are looking for someone cheap. I am not particularly imbued with Sherwood but there's no doubt he wouldn't come cheap, either in compensation or wages. Yet it seems they won't give up the chase. Let's face it, they can't suit everbody with their choice and its not a decison I'd like to make. I fancy big Sam would still be here but for Venkys apalling, hasty decision. Now they are reaping the whirlwind. I'm just going to sit back now and await the decision. But if they get it wrong they might as well sell up....there won't be another chance![/p][/quote]Of course the decision to sack Big Sam is going to reverberate for many years to come. In that one swinging of the axe this club was cast into the wilderness. It was a diabolical business decision very badly executed, leaving a bad taste in the mouth. It was also the most stupid footballing decision, albeit applauded by some, particularly on here. The reputation and position of Blackburn Rovers still hurtles downwards.[/p][/quote]Getting rid of big Sam wasn't as bad a mistake as appointing kean CheltRover

6:42pm Wed 17 Oct 12

stony bloke says...

I don't want Sherwood or Shearer. How many times do we have to say this? We want a manager with EXPERIENCE.
I don't want Sherwood or Shearer. How many times do we have to say this? We want a manager with EXPERIENCE. stony bloke

6:43pm Wed 17 Oct 12

CheltRover says...

carlmc1 wrote:
When Rovers stated that Samba was not for sale last year it was pretty obvious that he would get his move. He stated that he wanted to move on and move on he did. He stated that he could not promise to give his all for the club anymore. In situations like that, a club cannot hang on to an unhappy player.

If Sherwood wants the job badly enough, he can simply let it be known. He is also quite capable of resigning his post and then talk to Rovers of his own free accord. If he is certain that the job is his if we wants it, then that is all he needs to do. In effect he did force his move from Rovers to Spurs as a player, when Eric Hall his agent at the time promised to double his money. The shoe is on the other foot now, so Tim if you want the job, resign from Spurs.

Whether he is the right man for the job or not, only time will tell. When we hired Howard Kendall all those years ago, he was a novice manager. Despite that he took us from the old Third Division as champions in his first season to within goal difference of promotion, to the top flight, all on a shoestring. He went on to manage Everton to the championship, so a novice can some good!
We finished second to Grimsby that season
[quote][p][bold]carlmc1[/bold] wrote: When Rovers stated that Samba was not for sale last year it was pretty obvious that he would get his move. He stated that he wanted to move on and move on he did. He stated that he could not promise to give his all for the club anymore. In situations like that, a club cannot hang on to an unhappy player. If Sherwood wants the job badly enough, he can simply let it be known. He is also quite capable of resigning his post and then talk to Rovers of his own free accord. If he is certain that the job is his if we wants it, then that is all he needs to do. In effect he did force his move from Rovers to Spurs as a player, when Eric Hall his agent at the time promised to double his money. The shoe is on the other foot now, so Tim if you want the job, resign from Spurs. Whether he is the right man for the job or not, only time will tell. When we hired Howard Kendall all those years ago, he was a novice manager. Despite that he took us from the old Third Division as champions in his first season to within goal difference of promotion, to the top flight, all on a shoestring. He went on to manage Everton to the championship, so a novice can some good![/p][/quote]We finished second to Grimsby that season CheltRover

6:44pm Wed 17 Oct 12

Davelyn says...

Thank God for that !!!!
Certainly not my choice.
Thank God for that !!!! Certainly not my choice. Davelyn

6:45pm Wed 17 Oct 12

Davelyn says...

Thank God for that !!!
Certainly not my choice. Sherwood would not bring the fans back
Thank God for that !!! Certainly not my choice. Sherwood would not bring the fans back Davelyn

6:51pm Wed 17 Oct 12

smellthecoffee says...

Forever-Blue wrote:
Dougie Freedman from Palace or Flitcroft from Chorley thats it guys. This lot make noises like they give one and then hire a cheap option and blame it on Spurs. Dont discount Black either, especially if we win at Derby. Whats wrong with Holloway ffs. The whole dire 20+ months has been a nightmare that looks like it will not end any time soon. :-(
Still cannot believe Flitcroft's name is on their list....Chorley even lost at home to Fylde last night 4-1!!! Is that how far the club has plummeted with it's aspirations??
.
Those in Pune and in Blackburn couldn't organise the proverbial in a brewery. It's taken them two weeks to get to a shortlist plus another week of ar$e scratching and still nothing.
.
Do not realise how much long term damage this is doing to the club?? They are all completely out of their depths...it is shameful & embarrassing.
[quote][p][bold]Forever-Blue[/bold] wrote: Dougie Freedman from Palace or Flitcroft from Chorley thats it guys. This lot make noises like they give one and then hire a cheap option and blame it on Spurs. Dont discount Black either, especially if we win at Derby. Whats wrong with Holloway ffs. The whole dire 20+ months has been a nightmare that looks like it will not end any time soon. :-([/p][/quote]Still cannot believe Flitcroft's name is on their list....Chorley even lost at home to Fylde last night 4-1!!! Is that how far the club has plummeted with it's aspirations?? . Those in Pune and in Blackburn couldn't organise the proverbial in a brewery. It's taken them two weeks to get to a shortlist plus another week of ar$e scratching and still nothing. . Do not realise how much long term damage this is doing to the club?? They are all completely out of their depths...it is shameful & embarrassing. smellthecoffee

6:51pm Wed 17 Oct 12

blueblooded says...

So its Shearer, Black or Frank Rijkaard now on the "impressive" shortlist?

Why am I not elated?
So its Shearer, Black or Frank Rijkaard now on the "impressive" shortlist? Why am I not elated? blueblooded

6:54pm Wed 17 Oct 12

guiderover says...

We've now established that Sherwood is not coming here.Get Holloway in now and stop messing around,or we can kiss our chances of promotion goodbye.Get a move on Shebby!
We've now established that Sherwood is not coming here.Get Holloway in now and stop messing around,or we can kiss our chances of promotion goodbye.Get a move on Shebby! guiderover

6:54pm Wed 17 Oct 12

smellthecoffee says...

stony bloke wrote:
I don't want Sherwood or Shearer. How many times do we have to say this? We want a manager with EXPERIENCE.
If you go for experience then you would go for McCarthy. He wouldn't cost a penny in compensation and has achieved promotions with two separate clubs. Holloway would involve compensation and has only one promotion under his belt....plus a sacking from Leicester.
.
If you want someone to excite the fans and get them behind the club then you would employ Shearer with Dowie or Newell (who both have management experience).
[quote][p][bold]stony bloke[/bold] wrote: I don't want Sherwood or Shearer. How many times do we have to say this? We want a manager with EXPERIENCE.[/p][/quote]If you go for experience then you would go for McCarthy. He wouldn't cost a penny in compensation and has achieved promotions with two separate clubs. Holloway would involve compensation and has only one promotion under his belt....plus a sacking from Leicester. . If you want someone to excite the fans and get them behind the club then you would employ Shearer with Dowie or Newell (who both have management experience). smellthecoffee

6:55pm Wed 17 Oct 12

juanbbien says...

According to Tony Livesy on B.B.C north west a statement sent out from Ewood is that the next 24 hours are crucial what ever that means.
According to Tony Livesy on B.B.C north west a statement sent out from Ewood is that the next 24 hours are crucial what ever that means. juanbbien

6:58pm Wed 17 Oct 12

French Rover says...

juanbbien wrote:
According to Tony Livesy on B.B.C north west a statement sent out from Ewood is that the next 24 hours are crucial what ever that means.
Sherwood is coming...in charge for saturdays game at Derby!
[quote][p][bold]juanbbien[/bold] wrote: According to Tony Livesy on B.B.C north west a statement sent out from Ewood is that the next 24 hours are crucial what ever that means.[/p][/quote]Sherwood is coming...in charge for saturdays game at Derby! French Rover

6:58pm Wed 17 Oct 12

Captain Dreckley says...

Well at last a bit of good news on the manager front. Ok Venkys and Singh had nothing to do with a common sense decision. Sherwood isn't a proven manager he is s coach and venkys should have learnt their lesson putting coaches into managers positions with Kean and Black. There again, when it comes to football clubs experience shows that venkys and learning don't go together. Who knows, maybe Singh is watching results at QPR and waiting for good king Harry to be brought in then he can bring Hughes back as a free agent and save any compensation. Derby must be over the moon at the thought of Black in charge on Saturday.
Well at last a bit of good news on the manager front. Ok Venkys and Singh had nothing to do with a common sense decision. Sherwood isn't a proven manager he is s coach and venkys should have learnt their lesson putting coaches into managers positions with Kean and Black. There again, when it comes to football clubs experience shows that venkys and learning don't go together. Who knows, maybe Singh is watching results at QPR and waiting for good king Harry to be brought in then he can bring Hughes back as a free agent and save any compensation. Derby must be over the moon at the thought of Black in charge on Saturday. Captain Dreckley

6:59pm Wed 17 Oct 12

stick to football says...

It is understood that Souness, who also had a spell in charge at Bolton's rivals Blackburn Rovers from 2000-2004, may be brought in on a short-term basis to secure promotion to the Premier League.


How about Brad Freidel ?
It is understood that Souness, who also had a spell in charge at Bolton's rivals Blackburn Rovers from 2000-2004, may be brought in on a short-term basis to secure promotion to the Premier League. How about Brad Freidel ? stick to football

7:14pm Wed 17 Oct 12

merlinrabbit says...

guiderover wrote:
We've now established that Sherwood is not coming here.Get Holloway in now and stop messing around,or we can kiss our chances of promotion goodbye.Get a move on Shebby!
You are joking. Holloway hasnt achieved any more than Coyle and I wouldnt want him. Holloway is a ridiculous suggestion come from a desperate lack of good candidates. Weve been spoiled before
[quote][p][bold]guiderover[/bold] wrote: We've now established that Sherwood is not coming here.Get Holloway in now and stop messing around,or we can kiss our chances of promotion goodbye.Get a move on Shebby![/p][/quote]You are joking. Holloway hasnt achieved any more than Coyle and I wouldnt want him. Holloway is a ridiculous suggestion come from a desperate lack of good candidates. Weve been spoiled before merlinrabbit

7:43pm Wed 17 Oct 12

NICEONESUNSHINE, says...

If Shaggy really wants Deadwood (and Shaggys a Spuds fan after all remember) then I think he's going to have to dig a bit deeper in those pockets of his and show Mr Levi the colour of his money.

After a couple of weeks of what appears non activity and the speculation about OGS, Holloway, McCarthy etc, should the question now not be "Who wants to manager BRFC"?
If Shaggy really wants Deadwood (and Shaggys a Spuds fan after all remember) then I think he's going to have to dig a bit deeper in those pockets of his and show Mr Levi the colour of his money. After a couple of weeks of what appears non activity and the speculation about OGS, Holloway, McCarthy etc, should the question now not be "Who wants to manager BRFC"? NICEONESUNSHINE,

7:51pm Wed 17 Oct 12

Top10StillOn says...

trueblue72 wrote:
gpb501 wrote:
Rumour mill has Steve kean as a favourite to take on the Scotland job when Levine has been sacked.

Are Scotland that desperate lol!
I heard Alan brazil choke on his weetabix this am when domeone mentioned keanes name as a candidate for the Scotland job if Levine gets sacked.
His silence said it all.

He wasn't that quiet when we wanted keane out, what goes around comes around !!!
Exactly, nice one trueblue. Also like to see Charlie Nicholas' reaction if "he" gets the job as well.
[quote][p][bold]trueblue72[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]gpb501[/bold] wrote: Rumour mill has Steve kean as a favourite to take on the Scotland job when Levine has been sacked. Are Scotland that desperate lol![/p][/quote]I heard Alan brazil choke on his weetabix this am when domeone mentioned keanes name as a candidate for the Scotland job if Levine gets sacked. His silence said it all. He wasn't that quiet when we wanted keane out, what goes around comes around !!![/p][/quote]Exactly, nice one trueblue. Also like to see Charlie Nicholas' reaction if "he" gets the job as well. Top10StillOn

7:58pm Wed 17 Oct 12

A Rover 45 years and over says...

I think Sing should pack his bags and resign all he is doing is to look at people who would be manipulated by Venky's and have no proper experience, and to even consider Black will be a crime after what Venkys have put the fans through. I am not sure that they deserve any support and I am sure they wont get any if Black is appointed. Only a relegation battle awaits us if he is appointed. 2 points out of nine with no attacking stratergy. Sorry I cant go down and watch that.
I think Sing should pack his bags and resign all he is doing is to look at people who would be manipulated by Venky's and have no proper experience, and to even consider Black will be a crime after what Venkys have put the fans through. I am not sure that they deserve any support and I am sure they wont get any if Black is appointed. Only a relegation battle awaits us if he is appointed. 2 points out of nine with no attacking stratergy. Sorry I cant go down and watch that. A Rover 45 years and over

8:06pm Wed 17 Oct 12

Nuttall Street says...

It is now very clear that Rovers are on the brink of DISASTER. These Venky arrogant clowns having learnt nothing from the last two years of calamities are set upon appointing an INEXPERIENCED and malleable manager. If fans do not ACT NOW we will be saddled with STEVE KEAN MARK 2 and after that there will be nothing left worth saving.
We must BOYCOTT Ewood Park immediately and stay away until an experienced and PROVEN manager is appointed. If you have BRFC at heart join the BOYCOTT now.
It is now very clear that Rovers are on the brink of DISASTER. These Venky arrogant clowns having learnt nothing from the last two years of calamities are set upon appointing an INEXPERIENCED and malleable manager. If fans do not ACT NOW we will be saddled with STEVE KEAN MARK 2 and after that there will be nothing left worth saving. We must BOYCOTT Ewood Park immediately and stay away until an experienced and PROVEN manager is appointed. If you have BRFC at heart join the BOYCOTT now. Nuttall Street

8:24pm Wed 17 Oct 12

RUinsane says...

smellthecoffee wrote:
stony bloke wrote:
I don't want Sherwood or Shearer. How many times do we have to say this? We want a manager with EXPERIENCE.
If you go for experience then you would go for McCarthy. He wouldn't cost a penny in compensation and has achieved promotions with two separate clubs. Holloway would involve compensation and has only one promotion under his belt....plus a sacking from Leicester.
.
If you want someone to excite the fans and get them behind the club then you would employ Shearer with Dowie or Newell (who both have management experience).
Stick Bananman where the sun don't shine, So your saying hes never been fired? Let Bananaman go to Bumley.
Simon Grayson is number 2 on my list with Ole gunnar number 1.
Bananaman is way down below Owen Coyle just because of the shape of his nose. Only guy in football that comes close to steve bruce. If I wanted a manager to sniff round corners then he'd be the guy, but whoever gets picked has to represent our club and Mcarthy doesn't make good viewing.
[quote][p][bold]smellthecoffee[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]stony bloke[/bold] wrote: I don't want Sherwood or Shearer. How many times do we have to say this? We want a manager with EXPERIENCE.[/p][/quote]If you go for experience then you would go for McCarthy. He wouldn't cost a penny in compensation and has achieved promotions with two separate clubs. Holloway would involve compensation and has only one promotion under his belt....plus a sacking from Leicester. . If you want someone to excite the fans and get them behind the club then you would employ Shearer with Dowie or Newell (who both have management experience).[/p][/quote]Stick Bananman where the sun don't shine, So your saying hes never been fired? Let Bananaman go to Bumley. Simon Grayson is number 2 on my list with Ole gunnar number 1. Bananaman is way down below Owen Coyle just because of the shape of his nose. Only guy in football that comes close to steve bruce. If I wanted a manager to sniff round corners then he'd be the guy, but whoever gets picked has to represent our club and Mcarthy doesn't make good viewing. RUinsane

8:25pm Wed 17 Oct 12

RUinsane says...

Nuttall Street wrote:
It is now very clear that Rovers are on the brink of DISASTER. These Venky arrogant clowns having learnt nothing from the last two years of calamities are set upon appointing an INEXPERIENCED and malleable manager. If fans do not ACT NOW we will be saddled with STEVE KEAN MARK 2 and after that there will be nothing left worth saving.
We must BOYCOTT Ewood Park immediately and stay away until an experienced and PROVEN manager is appointed. If you have BRFC at heart join the BOYCOTT now.
Dancing Fool returns
[quote][p][bold]Nuttall Street[/bold] wrote: It is now very clear that Rovers are on the brink of DISASTER. These Venky arrogant clowns having learnt nothing from the last two years of calamities are set upon appointing an INEXPERIENCED and malleable manager. If fans do not ACT NOW we will be saddled with STEVE KEAN MARK 2 and after that there will be nothing left worth saving. We must BOYCOTT Ewood Park immediately and stay away until an experienced and PROVEN manager is appointed. If you have BRFC at heart join the BOYCOTT now.[/p][/quote]Dancing Fool returns RUinsane

8:31pm Wed 17 Oct 12

RUinsane says...

I don't want sherwood or Mick Bananaman Mcarthy, but whoever Rovers appoint is gonna get my full 100% backing, because if they appointed a dancing monkey it would have a better win ratio than steve kean. All the boycotters said they would return if kean was sacked and now we haven't even appointed a new guy yet and some PLONKERS are calling for a boycott already. As I said last week. I suspect these accounts belong to DINGLES or special needs clients.
I don't want sherwood or Mick Bananaman Mcarthy, but whoever Rovers appoint is gonna get my full 100% backing, because if they appointed a dancing monkey it would have a better win ratio than steve kean. All the boycotters said they would return if kean was sacked and now we haven't even appointed a new guy yet and some PLONKERS are calling for a boycott already. As I said last week. I suspect these accounts belong to DINGLES or special needs clients. RUinsane

8:46pm Wed 17 Oct 12

jim 2012 says...

rovers management such as it is seem to be trying to get timSherwood
A MAN WITH NO MANAGEMENT EXPERIENCE!!
if you what a young manager with little bit of
EXPERIENCE then try ROY KEANE
or we could go for some one with a lot of EXPERIENCE rafa benitez or ian holloway but please no more managers with no EXPERIENCE
rovers management such as it is seem to be trying to get timSherwood A MAN WITH NO MANAGEMENT EXPERIENCE!! if you what a young manager with little bit of EXPERIENCE then try ROY KEANE or we could go for some one with a lot of EXPERIENCE rafa benitez or ian holloway but please no more managers with no EXPERIENCE jim 2012

9:26pm Wed 17 Oct 12

RUinsane says...

smellthecoffee wrote:
stony bloke wrote:
I don't want Sherwood or Shearer. How many times do we have to say this? We want a manager with EXPERIENCE.
If you go for experience then you would go for McCarthy. He wouldn't cost a penny in compensation and has achieved promotions with two separate clubs. Holloway would involve compensation and has only one promotion under his belt....plus a sacking from Leicester.
.
If you want someone to excite the fans and get them behind the club then you would employ Shearer with Dowie or Newell (who both have management experience).
I've decided, I read your mind and your dream ticket would be, Mick Mcarthy as boss with Ian Dowie as assistant boss and Peater Beardsley as first team coach and Gary Neville on youth dvelopment. It sounds a good team and would definitely win the Ugly Munters in football barr none award year on year.
[quote][p][bold]smellthecoffee[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]stony bloke[/bold] wrote: I don't want Sherwood or Shearer. How many times do we have to say this? We want a manager with EXPERIENCE.[/p][/quote]If you go for experience then you would go for McCarthy. He wouldn't cost a penny in compensation and has achieved promotions with two separate clubs. Holloway would involve compensation and has only one promotion under his belt....plus a sacking from Leicester. . If you want someone to excite the fans and get them behind the club then you would employ Shearer with Dowie or Newell (who both have management experience).[/p][/quote]I've decided, I read your mind and your dream ticket would be, Mick Mcarthy as boss with Ian Dowie as assistant boss and Peater Beardsley as first team coach and Gary Neville on youth dvelopment. It sounds a good team and would definitely win the Ugly Munters in football barr none award year on year. RUinsane

9:29pm Wed 17 Oct 12

JPB says...

why is ole gunnar solskjaer worth waiting til november for? more **** from fans that think anything connected with man utd is a guaranteed recipe for success. 2 names. brian kidd and paul ince.

we need an EXPERIENCED PROVEN MANAGER. mick mccarthy, alan curbishley, alex mcleish, any of those 3 would do the job.
why is ole gunnar solskjaer worth waiting til november for? more **** from fans that think anything connected with man utd is a guaranteed recipe for success. 2 names. brian kidd and paul ince. we need an EXPERIENCED PROVEN MANAGER. mick mccarthy, alan curbishley, alex mcleish, any of those 3 would do the job. JPB

10:04pm Wed 17 Oct 12

wilyrover says...

Maybe I'm missing something here, but what has Sherwood ever achieved in coaching/managerial circles to merit being head hunted? We need a McCarthy type manager.
Maybe I'm missing something here, but what has Sherwood ever achieved in coaching/managerial circles to merit being head hunted? We need a McCarthy type manager. wilyrover

10:34pm Wed 17 Oct 12

maggie-T says...

Wait til your stand is renamed the shabby Singh stand, it's a coming
Wait til your stand is renamed the shabby Singh stand, it's a coming maggie-T

10:46pm Wed 17 Oct 12

RespectTheK-Dog says...

Harwoodstblue wrote:
RespectTheK-Dog wrote:
Riverside 7 wrote:
If Spurs wont let us speak to Sherwood and he won't walk out on them, then we've got to accept it and move on.

We should find out if OGS really wants to come to Ewood.

If he does, I'm sure that he would be worth the wait.
Of course Spurs will let you speak to Sherwood.

Daniel Levy is merely showing the chicken farmers how to conduct business.

Pretending they are so desperate to keep him - and you all fall for it - when AvB has already indicated he doesn't like him or even want him around the club!

Spurs don't even rate Sherwood. And I'm stumped if I can see why anyone else would either.
I think you'll, find that 95% of people on here agree with your last sentence, so you are telling us nothing really.
Au contraire

My reading is that loads of fans want this unpleasant, self serving joker in pronto.
[quote][p][bold]Harwoodstblue[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]RespectTheK-Dog[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Riverside 7[/bold] wrote: If Spurs wont let us speak to Sherwood and he won't walk out on them, then we've got to accept it and move on. We should find out if OGS really wants to come to Ewood. If he does, I'm sure that he would be worth the wait.[/p][/quote]Of course Spurs will let you speak to Sherwood. Daniel Levy is merely showing the chicken farmers how to conduct business. Pretending they are so desperate to keep him - and you all fall for it - when AvB has already indicated he doesn't like him or even want him around the club! Spurs don't even rate Sherwood. And I'm stumped if I can see why anyone else would either.[/p][/quote]I think you'll, find that 95% of people on here agree with your last sentence, so you are telling us nothing really.[/p][/quote]Au contraire My reading is that loads of fans want this unpleasant, self serving joker in pronto. RespectTheK-Dog

10:46pm Wed 17 Oct 12

RUinsane says...

JPB wrote:
why is ole gunnar solskjaer worth waiting til november for? more **** from fans that think anything connected with man utd is a guaranteed recipe for success. 2 names. brian kidd and paul ince.

we need an EXPERIENCED PROVEN MANAGER. mick mccarthy, alan curbishley, alex mcleish, any of those 3 would do the job.
Because solskjar has a 68% win ratio, won the league last year and is about to win it again. I'm not bothered if he played for Burnley with that kind of record.On the other hand, Mcarthy or bananaman has a win ratio of about 40% and two relegations and three sackings under his bent conk.
Does that answer your question?
[quote][p][bold]JPB[/bold] wrote: why is ole gunnar solskjaer worth waiting til november for? more **** from fans that think anything connected with man utd is a guaranteed recipe for success. 2 names. brian kidd and paul ince. we need an EXPERIENCED PROVEN MANAGER. mick mccarthy, alan curbishley, alex mcleish, any of those 3 would do the job.[/p][/quote]Because solskjar has a 68% win ratio, won the league last year and is about to win it again. I'm not bothered if he played for Burnley with that kind of record.On the other hand, Mcarthy or bananaman has a win ratio of about 40% and two relegations and three sackings under his bent conk. Does that answer your question? RUinsane

10:50pm Wed 17 Oct 12

RUinsane says...

wilyrover wrote:
Maybe I'm missing something here, but what has Sherwood ever achieved in coaching/managerial circles to merit being head hunted? We need a McCarthy type manager.
What is it with you fools and Mr bananaman. Mcarthy is just a journeyman manager, i know you've been used to kean but for gawds sake man. Mcarthy was born for dingle dangling.
[quote][p][bold]wilyrover[/bold] wrote: Maybe I'm missing something here, but what has Sherwood ever achieved in coaching/managerial circles to merit being head hunted? We need a McCarthy type manager.[/p][/quote]What is it with you fools and Mr bananaman. Mcarthy is just a journeyman manager, i know you've been used to kean but for gawds sake man. Mcarthy was born for dingle dangling. RUinsane

10:59pm Wed 17 Oct 12

RespectTheK-Dog says...

French Rover wrote:
Tamworth rover wrote:
RespectTheK-Dog wrote:
Riverside 7 wrote:
If Spurs wont let us speak to Sherwood and he won't walk out on them, then we've got to accept it and move on.

We should find out if OGS really wants to come to Ewood.

If he does, I'm sure that he would be worth the wait.
Of course Spurs will let you speak to Sherwood.

Daniel Levy is merely showing the chicken farmers how to conduct business.

Pretending they are so desperate to keep him - and you all fall for it - when AvB has already indicated he doesn't like him or even want him around the club!

Spurs don't even rate Sherwood. And I'm stumped if I can see why anyone else would either.
Wrong on so many levels. The reason AVB doesnt want him at the club is down to the fact that he has more respect from all players and staff at the football club and its showing him up. How can you say spurs dont even rate him when Levy wants him to become the director of football at the club and thats why hes refusing to let him speak to us plus 80% of the back room coatching staff would also be leaving to come to us if Sherwood was appointed manager, Which would cause huge problems at Spurs and unsettle players etc.

For me Sherwood would be a much better addition then the likes of Black,Holloway, McCarthy and Shearer
Agree with the post - Levy likes him and wants him to stay but AVB wants his own appointment - but I think Levy will relent if Spurs get the right level of compensation money.Three million was mentioned last week so guess that it's that figure which is the key that opens the door for Tim.
Just need our owners to show some intent (and cash) and sort that out ASAP now.
Utter tripe.

Are you seriously suggesting for one second that Levy would consider keeping Sherwood when AvB wants him out?

Or that AvB is somehow "jealous" of Sherwood?

If Levy loves Deadwood so much why didn't he make HIM manager? Er because he thought he'd get a proper manager.

Sherwood only got a position at Spurs because he was a mate of Jamie Redknapp's. And that is a sorry fact.

But keep on believing the hype about him being hot property?

Can you not see that on a basic level Tim Sherwood is scum? He's a piece of work. White bread.

You are being played by Levy and it's hilarious that you can't even see it. The more he pretends to want to keep him (£3m compo I believe HAHAHA) the more you seem to believe he has some sort of talent.

Levy will let him go alright. You'll pay through the nose and he'll ruin you. Deadwood's ambitious alright - but he'll have no loyalty to you lot.
[quote][p][bold]French Rover[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Tamworth rover[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]RespectTheK-Dog[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Riverside 7[/bold] wrote: If Spurs wont let us speak to Sherwood and he won't walk out on them, then we've got to accept it and move on. We should find out if OGS really wants to come to Ewood. If he does, I'm sure that he would be worth the wait.[/p][/quote]Of course Spurs will let you speak to Sherwood. Daniel Levy is merely showing the chicken farmers how to conduct business. Pretending they are so desperate to keep him - and you all fall for it - when AvB has already indicated he doesn't like him or even want him around the club! Spurs don't even rate Sherwood. And I'm stumped if I can see why anyone else would either.[/p][/quote]Wrong on so many levels. The reason AVB doesnt want him at the club is down to the fact that he has more respect from all players and staff at the football club and its showing him up. How can you say spurs dont even rate him when Levy wants him to become the director of football at the club and thats why hes refusing to let him speak to us plus 80% of the back room coatching staff would also be leaving to come to us if Sherwood was appointed manager, Which would cause huge problems at Spurs and unsettle players etc. For me Sherwood would be a much better addition then the likes of Black,Holloway, McCarthy and Shearer[/p][/quote]Agree with the post - Levy likes him and wants him to stay but AVB wants his own appointment - but I think Levy will relent if Spurs get the right level of compensation money.Three million was mentioned last week so guess that it's that figure which is the key that opens the door for Tim. Just need our owners to show some intent (and cash) and sort that out ASAP now.[/p][/quote]Utter tripe. Are you seriously suggesting for one second that Levy would consider keeping Sherwood when AvB wants him out? Or that AvB is somehow "jealous" of Sherwood? If Levy loves Deadwood so much why didn't he make HIM manager? Er because he thought he'd get a proper manager. Sherwood only got a position at Spurs because he was a mate of Jamie Redknapp's. And that is a sorry fact. But keep on believing the hype about him being hot property? Can you not see that on a basic level Tim Sherwood is scum? He's a piece of work. White bread. You are being played by Levy and it's hilarious that you can't even see it. The more he pretends to want to keep him (£3m compo I believe HAHAHA) the more you seem to believe he has some sort of talent. Levy will let him go alright. You'll pay through the nose and he'll ruin you. Deadwood's ambitious alright - but he'll have no loyalty to you lot. RespectTheK-Dog

11:28pm Wed 17 Oct 12

RUinsane says...

RespectTheK-Dog wrote:
French Rover wrote:
Tamworth rover wrote:
RespectTheK-Dog wrote:
Riverside 7 wrote:
If Spurs wont let us speak to Sherwood and he won't walk out on them, then we've got to accept it and move on.

We should find out if OGS really wants to come to Ewood.

If he does, I'm sure that he would be worth the wait.
Of course Spurs will let you speak to Sherwood.

Daniel Levy is merely showing the chicken farmers how to conduct business.

Pretending they are so desperate to keep him - and you all fall for it - when AvB has already indicated he doesn't like him or even want him around the club!

Spurs don't even rate Sherwood. And I'm stumped if I can see why anyone else would either.
Wrong on so many levels. The reason AVB doesnt want him at the club is down to the fact that he has more respect from all players and staff at the football club and its showing him up. How can you say spurs dont even rate him when Levy wants him to become the director of football at the club and thats why hes refusing to let him speak to us plus 80% of the back room coatching staff would also be leaving to come to us if Sherwood was appointed manager, Which would cause huge problems at Spurs and unsettle players etc.

For me Sherwood would be a much better addition then the likes of Black,Holloway, McCarthy and Shearer
Agree with the post - Levy likes him and wants him to stay but AVB wants his own appointment - but I think Levy will relent if Spurs get the right level of compensation money.Three million was mentioned last week so guess that it's that figure which is the key that opens the door for Tim.
Just need our owners to show some intent (and cash) and sort that out ASAP now.
Utter tripe.

Are you seriously suggesting for one second that Levy would consider keeping Sherwood when AvB wants him out?

Or that AvB is somehow "jealous" of Sherwood?

If Levy loves Deadwood so much why didn't he make HIM manager? Er because he thought he'd get a proper manager.

Sherwood only got a position at Spurs because he was a mate of Jamie Redknapp's. And that is a sorry fact.

But keep on believing the hype about him being hot property?

Can you not see that on a basic level Tim Sherwood is scum? He's a piece of work. White bread.

You are being played by Levy and it's hilarious that you can't even see it. The more he pretends to want to keep him (£3m compo I believe HAHAHA) the more you seem to believe he has some sort of talent.

Levy will let him go alright. You'll pay through the nose and he'll ruin you. Deadwood's ambitious alright - but he'll have no loyalty to you lot.
The bitterness of this post spaeks volumes of its author, a dingle who can't believe that Rovers are so much bigger than the Turd that they can contemplate paying 3 million in compensation for a manager, instead of waving goodbye to your own who would sooner pay his own compo, to leave the dump of a p1ss stain club of yours.
Not that I want Sherwood, but whats it got to do with you? You lot can't even afford to pay 3 million on a player so naff off back t turd with you where you can start talking about what failure of a manager you can afford to pay until he scarpes enough coin together to pay himself out of his contract at your dump. Bottom trougher
[quote][p][bold]RespectTheK-Dog[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]French Rover[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Tamworth rover[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]RespectTheK-Dog[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Riverside 7[/bold] wrote: If Spurs wont let us speak to Sherwood and he won't walk out on them, then we've got to accept it and move on. We should find out if OGS really wants to come to Ewood. If he does, I'm sure that he would be worth the wait.[/p][/quote]Of course Spurs will let you speak to Sherwood. Daniel Levy is merely showing the chicken farmers how to conduct business. Pretending they are so desperate to keep him - and you all fall for it - when AvB has already indicated he doesn't like him or even want him around the club! Spurs don't even rate Sherwood. And I'm stumped if I can see why anyone else would either.[/p][/quote]Wrong on so many levels. The reason AVB doesnt want him at the club is down to the fact that he has more respect from all players and staff at the football club and its showing him up. How can you say spurs dont even rate him when Levy wants him to become the director of football at the club and thats why hes refusing to let him speak to us plus 80% of the back room coatching staff would also be leaving to come to us if Sherwood was appointed manager, Which would cause huge problems at Spurs and unsettle players etc. For me Sherwood would be a much better addition then the likes of Black,Holloway, McCarthy and Shearer[/p][/quote]Agree with the post - Levy likes him and wants him to stay but AVB wants his own appointment - but I think Levy will relent if Spurs get the right level of compensation money.Three million was mentioned last week so guess that it's that figure which is the key that opens the door for Tim. Just need our owners to show some intent (and cash) and sort that out ASAP now.[/p][/quote]Utter tripe. Are you seriously suggesting for one second that Levy would consider keeping Sherwood when AvB wants him out? Or that AvB is somehow "jealous" of Sherwood? If Levy loves Deadwood so much why didn't he make HIM manager? Er because he thought he'd get a proper manager. Sherwood only got a position at Spurs because he was a mate of Jamie Redknapp's. And that is a sorry fact. But keep on believing the hype about him being hot property? Can you not see that on a basic level Tim Sherwood is scum? He's a piece of work. White bread. You are being played by Levy and it's hilarious that you can't even see it. The more he pretends to want to keep him (£3m compo I believe HAHAHA) the more you seem to believe he has some sort of talent. Levy will let him go alright. You'll pay through the nose and he'll ruin you. Deadwood's ambitious alright - but he'll have no loyalty to you lot.[/p][/quote]The bitterness of this post spaeks volumes of its author, a dingle who can't believe that Rovers are so much bigger than the Turd that they can contemplate paying 3 million in compensation for a manager, instead of waving goodbye to your own who would sooner pay his own compo, to leave the dump of a p1ss stain club of yours. Not that I want Sherwood, but whats it got to do with you? You lot can't even afford to pay 3 million on a player so naff off back t turd with you where you can start talking about what failure of a manager you can afford to pay until he scarpes enough coin together to pay himself out of his contract at your dump. Bottom trougher RUinsane

12:21am Thu 18 Oct 12

smellthecoffee says...

RUinsane wrote:
RespectTheK-Dog wrote:
French Rover wrote:
Tamworth rover wrote:
RespectTheK-Dog wrote:
Riverside 7 wrote: If Spurs wont let us speak to Sherwood and he won't walk out on them, then we've got to accept it and move on. We should find out if OGS really wants to come to Ewood. If he does, I'm sure that he would be worth the wait.
Of course Spurs will let you speak to Sherwood. Daniel Levy is merely showing the chicken farmers how to conduct business. Pretending they are so desperate to keep him - and you all fall for it - when AvB has already indicated he doesn't like him or even want him around the club! Spurs don't even rate Sherwood. And I'm stumped if I can see why anyone else would either.
Wrong on so many levels. The reason AVB doesnt want him at the club is down to the fact that he has more respect from all players and staff at the football club and its showing him up. How can you say spurs dont even rate him when Levy wants him to become the director of football at the club and thats why hes refusing to let him speak to us plus 80% of the back room coatching staff would also be leaving to come to us if Sherwood was appointed manager, Which would cause huge problems at Spurs and unsettle players etc. For me Sherwood would be a much better addition then the likes of Black,Holloway, McCarthy and Shearer
Agree with the post - Levy likes him and wants him to stay but AVB wants his own appointment - but I think Levy will relent if Spurs get the right level of compensation money.Three million was mentioned last week so guess that it's that figure which is the key that opens the door for Tim. Just need our owners to show some intent (and cash) and sort that out ASAP now.
Utter tripe. Are you seriously suggesting for one second that Levy would consider keeping Sherwood when AvB wants him out? Or that AvB is somehow "jealous" of Sherwood? If Levy loves Deadwood so much why didn't he make HIM manager? Er because he thought he'd get a proper manager. Sherwood only got a position at Spurs because he was a mate of Jamie Redknapp's. And that is a sorry fact. But keep on believing the hype about him being hot property? Can you not see that on a basic level Tim Sherwood is scum? He's a piece of work. White bread. You are being played by Levy and it's hilarious that you can't even see it. The more he pretends to want to keep him (£3m compo I believe HAHAHA) the more you seem to believe he has some sort of talent. Levy will let him go alright. You'll pay through the nose and he'll ruin you. Deadwood's ambitious alright - but he'll have no loyalty to you lot.
The bitterness of this post spaeks volumes of its author, a dingle who can't believe that Rovers are so much bigger than the Turd that they can contemplate paying 3 million in compensation for a manager, instead of waving goodbye to your own who would sooner pay his own compo, to leave the dump of a p1ss stain club of yours. Not that I want Sherwood, but whats it got to do with you? You lot can't even afford to pay 3 million on a player so naff off back t turd with you where you can start talking about what failure of a manager you can afford to pay until he scarpes enough coin together to pay himself out of his contract at your dump. Bottom trougher
ok now...time for your bath and then bed.
[quote][p][bold]RUinsane[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]RespectTheK-Dog[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]French Rover[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Tamworth rover[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]RespectTheK-Dog[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Riverside 7[/bold] wrote: If Spurs wont let us speak to Sherwood and he won't walk out on them, then we've got to accept it and move on. We should find out if OGS really wants to come to Ewood. If he does, I'm sure that he would be worth the wait.[/p][/quote]Of course Spurs will let you speak to Sherwood. Daniel Levy is merely showing the chicken farmers how to conduct business. Pretending they are so desperate to keep him - and you all fall for it - when AvB has already indicated he doesn't like him or even want him around the club! Spurs don't even rate Sherwood. And I'm stumped if I can see why anyone else would either.[/p][/quote]Wrong on so many levels. The reason AVB doesnt want him at the club is down to the fact that he has more respect from all players and staff at the football club and its showing him up. How can you say spurs dont even rate him when Levy wants him to become the director of football at the club and thats why hes refusing to let him speak to us plus 80% of the back room coatching staff would also be leaving to come to us if Sherwood was appointed manager, Which would cause huge problems at Spurs and unsettle players etc. For me Sherwood would be a much better addition then the likes of Black,Holloway, McCarthy and Shearer[/p][/quote]Agree with the post - Levy likes him and wants him to stay but AVB wants his own appointment - but I think Levy will relent if Spurs get the right level of compensation money.Three million was mentioned last week so guess that it's that figure which is the key that opens the door for Tim. Just need our owners to show some intent (and cash) and sort that out ASAP now.[/p][/quote]Utter tripe. Are you seriously suggesting for one second that Levy would consider keeping Sherwood when AvB wants him out? Or that AvB is somehow "jealous" of Sherwood? If Levy loves Deadwood so much why didn't he make HIM manager? Er because he thought he'd get a proper manager. Sherwood only got a position at Spurs because he was a mate of Jamie Redknapp's. And that is a sorry fact. But keep on believing the hype about him being hot property? Can you not see that on a basic level Tim Sherwood is scum? He's a piece of work. White bread. You are being played by Levy and it's hilarious that you can't even see it. The more he pretends to want to keep him (£3m compo I believe HAHAHA) the more you seem to believe he has some sort of talent. Levy will let him go alright. You'll pay through the nose and he'll ruin you. Deadwood's ambitious alright - but he'll have no loyalty to you lot.[/p][/quote]The bitterness of this post spaeks volumes of its author, a dingle who can't believe that Rovers are so much bigger than the Turd that they can contemplate paying 3 million in compensation for a manager, instead of waving goodbye to your own who would sooner pay his own compo, to leave the dump of a p1ss stain club of yours. Not that I want Sherwood, but whats it got to do with you? You lot can't even afford to pay 3 million on a player so naff off back t turd with you where you can start talking about what failure of a manager you can afford to pay until he scarpes enough coin together to pay himself out of his contract at your dump. Bottom trougher[/p][/quote]ok now...time for your bath and then bed. smellthecoffee

12:24am Thu 18 Oct 12

smellthecoffee says...

RUinsane wrote:
smellthecoffee wrote:
stony bloke wrote: I don't want Sherwood or Shearer. How many times do we have to say this? We want a manager with EXPERIENCE.
If you go for experience then you would go for McCarthy. He wouldn't cost a penny in compensation and has achieved promotions with two separate clubs. Holloway would involve compensation and has only one promotion under his belt....plus a sacking from Leicester. . If you want someone to excite the fans and get them behind the club then you would employ Shearer with Dowie or Newell (who both have management experience).
I've decided, I read your mind and your dream ticket would be, Mick Mcarthy as boss with Ian Dowie as assistant boss and Peater Beardsley as first team coach and Gary Neville on youth dvelopment. It sounds a good team and would definitely win the Ugly Munters in football barr none award year on year.
Time to visit the doctor and increase the medication....how's the one-to-one's doing?
[quote][p][bold]RUinsane[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]smellthecoffee[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]stony bloke[/bold] wrote: I don't want Sherwood or Shearer. How many times do we have to say this? We want a manager with EXPERIENCE.[/p][/quote]If you go for experience then you would go for McCarthy. He wouldn't cost a penny in compensation and has achieved promotions with two separate clubs. Holloway would involve compensation and has only one promotion under his belt....plus a sacking from Leicester. . If you want someone to excite the fans and get them behind the club then you would employ Shearer with Dowie or Newell (who both have management experience).[/p][/quote]I've decided, I read your mind and your dream ticket would be, Mick Mcarthy as boss with Ian Dowie as assistant boss and Peater Beardsley as first team coach and Gary Neville on youth dvelopment. It sounds a good team and would definitely win the Ugly Munters in football barr none award year on year.[/p][/quote]Time to visit the doctor and increase the medication....how's the one-to-one's doing? smellthecoffee

4:48am Thu 18 Oct 12

jim 2012 says...

eddyo wrote:
Rovers 1495 wrote:
Rearrange these words into well-known phrase

Dead flogging horse a
'Dead flogging horse a'
*
David Dunn ?
me!!
[quote][p][bold]eddyo[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Rovers 1495[/bold] wrote: Rearrange these words into well-known phrase Dead flogging horse a[/p][/quote]'Dead flogging horse a' * David Dunn ?[/p][/quote]me!! jim 2012

4:51am Thu 18 Oct 12

Roverthere says...

FannyTickler wrote:
Keep lowering your sights. You'll be wishing you still had Kean...
No!
[quote][p][bold]FannyTickler[/bold] wrote: Keep lowering your sights. You'll be wishing you still had Kean...[/p][/quote]No! Roverthere

4:55am Thu 18 Oct 12

Roverthere says...

Bazzer wrote:
Is Eckersley playing? wrote:
We can't have it all ways. There has been complaints that they are looking for someone cheap. I am not particularly imbued with Sherwood but there's no doubt he wouldn't come cheap, either in compensation or wages. Yet it seems they won't give up the chase. Let's face it, they can't suit everbody with their choice and its not a decison I'd like to make. I fancy big Sam would still be here but for Venkys apalling, hasty decision. Now they are reaping the whirlwind. I'm just going to sit back now and await the decision. But if they get it wrong they might as well sell up....there won't be another chance!
Of course the decision to sack Big Sam is going to reverberate for many years to come. In that one swinging of the axe this club was cast into the wilderness. It was a diabolical business decision very badly executed, leaving a bad taste in the mouth. It was also the most stupid footballing decision, albeit applauded by some, particularly on here.
The reputation and position of Blackburn Rovers still hurtles downwards.
Yes, the start of the downward spiral by that one idiotic decision!
[quote][p][bold]Bazzer[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Is Eckersley playing?[/bold] wrote: We can't have it all ways. There has been complaints that they are looking for someone cheap. I am not particularly imbued with Sherwood but there's no doubt he wouldn't come cheap, either in compensation or wages. Yet it seems they won't give up the chase. Let's face it, they can't suit everbody with their choice and its not a decison I'd like to make. I fancy big Sam would still be here but for Venkys apalling, hasty decision. Now they are reaping the whirlwind. I'm just going to sit back now and await the decision. But if they get it wrong they might as well sell up....there won't be another chance![/p][/quote]Of course the decision to sack Big Sam is going to reverberate for many years to come. In that one swinging of the axe this club was cast into the wilderness. It was a diabolical business decision very badly executed, leaving a bad taste in the mouth. It was also the most stupid footballing decision, albeit applauded by some, particularly on here. The reputation and position of Blackburn Rovers still hurtles downwards.[/p][/quote]Yes, the start of the downward spiral by that one idiotic decision! Roverthere

5:14am Thu 18 Oct 12

Roverthere says...

I think the truth of the delay is that nobody applied or even wants the job with these incompetent management and owners! What a farce!
I think the truth of the delay is that nobody applied or even wants the job with these incompetent management and owners! What a farce! Roverthere

5:23am Thu 18 Oct 12

maggie-T says...

What about colonel sanders?
What about colonel sanders? maggie-T

5:41am Thu 18 Oct 12

ronnie clayton says...

Nuttall Street wrote:
Extensive managerial experience is not a priority! God, these Indians are going to kill Rovers. Managerial experience was not a priority when they sacked BFS and despite the series of disasters since then Venkys have not learned anything. Blackburn are doomed while these arrogant fools own the club.
IT IS TIME NOW FOR AN IMMEDIATE BOYCOTT UNTIL A DECENT PROVEN MANAGER IS APPOINTED or we will be saddled with another useless manager through whom Venkys will manage the team by default. BOYCOTT NOW BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE!
thats the way we are heading
[quote][p][bold]Nuttall Street[/bold] wrote: Extensive managerial experience is not a priority! God, these Indians are going to kill Rovers. Managerial experience was not a priority when they sacked BFS and despite the series of disasters since then Venkys have not learned anything. Blackburn are doomed while these arrogant fools own the club. IT IS TIME NOW FOR AN IMMEDIATE BOYCOTT UNTIL A DECENT PROVEN MANAGER IS APPOINTED or we will be saddled with another useless manager through whom Venkys will manage the team by default. BOYCOTT NOW BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE![/p][/quote]thats the way we are heading ronnie clayton

5:43am Thu 18 Oct 12

whappen says...

Rovers1975 wrote:
burnleyglentoran wrote: Spurs obviously dont want some, (what was it you lot were calling it 8 months ago? oh yes!) little chumpionship club, distracting the big boys from getting on with business in the Prem! BRKFC - JUST A LAUGHING STOCK NEAR SHADSWORTH
Oh dear, selective memory syndrome again I see. An average crowd of 10,000 and a manager who's just dropped you like a piece of sh1t for a lower league club? Now that's what I call a laughing stock.
"Bournemouth is the only club I would have left (Burnley) for"

When was the last time you heard those words in the same sentence?

Kind of says it all, don't you think?
[quote][p][bold]Rovers1975[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]burnleyglentoran[/bold] wrote: Spurs obviously dont want some, (what was it you lot were calling it 8 months ago? oh yes!) little chumpionship club, distracting the big boys from getting on with business in the Prem! BRKFC - JUST A LAUGHING STOCK NEAR SHADSWORTH[/p][/quote]Oh dear, selective memory syndrome again I see. An average crowd of 10,000 and a manager who's just dropped you like a piece of sh1t for a lower league club? Now that's what I call a laughing stock.[/p][/quote]"Bournemouth is the only club I would have left (Burnley) for" When was the last time you heard those words in the same sentence? Kind of says it all, don't you think? whappen

6:46am Thu 18 Oct 12

ronnie clayton says...

Shebby ,
What about your co-commentator on ESPN , STEVE McMAHON, had his ups and downs in management ,but at least managed to get promotion for both Swindon and Blackpool, was the manager at Blackpool prior to HENDRY coming in and making a pigs a*rse out of his tenure as Blackpool Manager , the Pool supporters were grateful to Grayson who came in and sorted out Hendry`s mess.
Shebby , What about your co-commentator on ESPN , STEVE McMAHON, had his ups and downs in management ,but at least managed to get promotion for both Swindon and Blackpool, was the manager at Blackpool prior to HENDRY coming in and making a pigs a*rse out of his tenure as Blackpool Manager , the Pool supporters were grateful to Grayson who came in and sorted out Hendry`s mess. ronnie clayton

7:08am Thu 18 Oct 12

MatthewCA says...

FANS have choose and appoint the new manager - Who is the best with championship budget....?
FANS have choose and appoint the new manager - Who is the best with championship budget....? MatthewCA

8:24am Thu 18 Oct 12

Rovers 1495 says...

jogalot wrote:
bburnrover wrote:
Well who gives one about Sherwood what has he ever done in management? Do you all feel Shebby knows anything about football and management? I would personally not go near anyone that Shebby likes as he is just another Charlie Chaplin trying to make a name for himself.Please could someone explain why a provincial club based in east Lancashire require a Global Adviser? We should go for either a big name or a young hungry manager with a good track record and who knows the game backward.
Agreed although if Sherwood came, I'd get behind him but 3 weeks and they haven't sorted it is ridiculous. They should move on but the Global Advisor must have ulterior motives for not doing so. All names mentioned have more experience than Sherwood but experience is apparently not a priority...

There's just the £8million paid for Rhodes that keeps me hanging on to the hope that they will make a good appointment. Everything else points to it being more of the same stupidity. There was a light at the end of the tunnel when Kean went but now it's looking increasingly Black. :-((((
Surely they should have a couple of quid left from the parachute payments
[quote][p][bold]jogalot[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]bburnrover[/bold] wrote: Well who gives one about Sherwood what has he ever done in management? Do you all feel Shebby knows anything about football and management? I would personally not go near anyone that Shebby likes as he is just another Charlie Chaplin trying to make a name for himself.Please could someone explain why a provincial club based in east Lancashire require a Global Adviser? We should go for either a big name or a young hungry manager with a good track record and who knows the game backward.[/p][/quote]Agreed although if Sherwood came, I'd get behind him but 3 weeks and they haven't sorted it is ridiculous. They should move on but the Global Advisor must have ulterior motives for not doing so. All names mentioned have more experience than Sherwood but experience is apparently not a priority... There's just the £8million paid for Rhodes that keeps me hanging on to the hope that they will make a good appointment. Everything else points to it being more of the same stupidity. There was a light at the end of the tunnel when Kean went but now it's looking increasingly Black. :-(((([/p][/quote]Surely they should have a couple of quid left from the parachute payments Rovers 1495

8:29am Thu 18 Oct 12

Rovers 1495 says...

juanbbien wrote:
According to Tony Livesy on B.B.C north west a statement sent out from Ewood is that the next 24 hours are crucial what ever that means.
It means that Balaji will take his finger out of his bottom
[quote][p][bold]juanbbien[/bold] wrote: According to Tony Livesy on B.B.C north west a statement sent out from Ewood is that the next 24 hours are crucial what ever that means.[/p][/quote]It means that Balaji will take his finger out of his bottom Rovers 1495

9:20am Thu 18 Oct 12

maggie-T says...

Colonel sanders will be announced as the new manager in the newly renamed shabby Singh stand
Colonel sanders will be announced as the new manager in the newly renamed shabby Singh stand maggie-T

9:32am Thu 18 Oct 12

kiwipom73 says...

Good comments from "jogalot" ....man on the move !
There have been interesting experienced Managers mentioned....yet it all comes down to
1) the ground rules set by Venky & whover else has a finger in the Rovers pie
2) who well work with those alrady on-board
3) what role will Singh be playing in the new set-up and who is prepared the have him in there !!!!!!
4) who would want to travel too India every fortnight to report to Ms Venky !!!!!
5) who,s wife/partner enjoys he odd curry....


5)
Good comments from "jogalot" ....man on the move ! There have been interesting experienced Managers mentioned....yet it all comes down to 1) the ground rules set by Venky & whover else has a finger in the Rovers pie 2) who well work with those alrady on-board 3) what role will Singh be playing in the new set-up and who is prepared the have him in there !!!!!! 4) who would want to travel too India every fortnight to report to Ms Venky !!!!! 5) who,s wife/partner enjoys he odd curry.... 5) kiwipom73

10:02am Thu 18 Oct 12

blueblooded says...

Rovers 1495 wrote:
juanbbien wrote:
According to Tony Livesy on B.B.C north west a statement sent out from Ewood is that the next 24 hours are crucial what ever that means.
It means that Balaji will take his finger out of his bottom
Expecting to hear something by weekend.
[quote][p][bold]Rovers 1495[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]juanbbien[/bold] wrote: According to Tony Livesy on B.B.C north west a statement sent out from Ewood is that the next 24 hours are crucial what ever that means.[/p][/quote]It means that Balaji will take his finger out of his bottom[/p][/quote]Expecting to hear something by weekend. blueblooded

10:29am Thu 18 Oct 12

Rovers 1495 says...

blueblooded wrote:
Rovers 1495 wrote:
juanbbien wrote:
According to Tony Livesy on B.B.C north west a statement sent out from Ewood is that the next 24 hours are crucial what ever that means.
It means that Balaji will take his finger out of his bottom
Expecting to hear something by weekend.
Something like 'Eric will be taking charge of the Derby game' ...
[quote][p][bold]blueblooded[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Rovers 1495[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]juanbbien[/bold] wrote: According to Tony Livesy on B.B.C north west a statement sent out from Ewood is that the next 24 hours are crucial what ever that means.[/p][/quote]It means that Balaji will take his finger out of his bottom[/p][/quote]Expecting to hear something by weekend.[/p][/quote]Something like 'Eric will be taking charge of the Derby game' ... Rovers 1495

10:35am Thu 18 Oct 12

French Rover says...

RespectTheK-Dog wrote:
French Rover wrote:
Tamworth rover wrote:
RespectTheK-Dog wrote:
Riverside 7 wrote:
If Spurs wont let us speak to Sherwood and he won't walk out on them, then we've got to accept it and move on.

We should find out if OGS really wants to come to Ewood.

If he does, I'm sure that he would be worth the wait.
Of course Spurs will let you speak to Sherwood.

Daniel Levy is merely showing the chicken farmers how to conduct business.

Pretending they are so desperate to keep him - and you all fall for it - when AvB has already indicated he doesn't like him or even want him around the club!

Spurs don't even rate Sherwood. And I'm stumped if I can see why anyone else would either.
Wrong on so many levels. The reason AVB doesnt want him at the club is down to the fact that he has more respect from all players and staff at the football club and its showing him up. How can you say spurs dont even rate him when Levy wants him to become the director of football at the club and thats why hes refusing to let him speak to us plus 80% of the back room coatching staff would also be leaving to come to us if Sherwood was appointed manager, Which would cause huge problems at Spurs and unsettle players etc.

For me Sherwood would be a much better addition then the likes of Black,Holloway, McCarthy and Shearer
Agree with the post - Levy likes him and wants him to stay but AVB wants his own appointment - but I think Levy will relent if Spurs get the right level of compensation money.Three million was mentioned last week so guess that it's that figure which is the key that opens the door for Tim.
Just need our owners to show some intent (and cash) and sort that out ASAP now.
Utter tripe.

Are you seriously suggesting for one second that Levy would consider keeping Sherwood when AvB wants him out?

Or that AvB is somehow "jealous" of Sherwood?

If Levy loves Deadwood so much why didn't he make HIM manager? Er because he thought he'd get a proper manager.

Sherwood only got a position at Spurs because he was a mate of Jamie Redknapp's. And that is a sorry fact.

But keep on believing the hype about him being hot property?

Can you not see that on a basic level Tim Sherwood is scum? He's a piece of work. White bread.

You are being played by Levy and it's hilarious that you can't even see it. The more he pretends to want to keep him (£3m compo I believe HAHAHA) the more you seem to believe he has some sort of talent.

Levy will let him go alright. You'll pay through the nose and he'll ruin you. Deadwood's ambitious alright - but he'll have no loyalty to you lot.
Wow - why are you so jealous of the possibility us getting Sherwood as our next manager? That is quite a rant even for a deluded claret. Has Howe's betrayal (almost equal to Coyle's) hurt you so badly that you need to slag-off everything Rovers do...? Just because your (ex) manager would rather go build sandcastles on Bournemouth beach rather than continue with the impossible task of building the shambles at the Turf into a football club, please do not bring your inane ramblings onto our site.

anyway it may be Holloway and not Sherwood that comes to Ewood - but guess that you will have plenty to slag him off for too....maybe your next manager can be one of our dregs that we didn't want? I will ask Shebby to send you the 'not wanted' list.
[quote][p][bold]RespectTheK-Dog[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]French Rover[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Tamworth rover[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]RespectTheK-Dog[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Riverside 7[/bold] wrote: If Spurs wont let us speak to Sherwood and he won't walk out on them, then we've got to accept it and move on. We should find out if OGS really wants to come to Ewood. If he does, I'm sure that he would be worth the wait.[/p][/quote]Of course Spurs will let you speak to Sherwood. Daniel Levy is merely showing the chicken farmers how to conduct business. Pretending they are so desperate to keep him - and you all fall for it - when AvB has already indicated he doesn't like him or even want him around the club! Spurs don't even rate Sherwood. And I'm stumped if I can see why anyone else would either.[/p][/quote]Wrong on so many levels. The reason AVB doesnt want him at the club is down to the fact that he has more respect from all players and staff at the football club and its showing him up. How can you say spurs dont even rate him when Levy wants him to become the director of football at the club and thats why hes refusing to let him speak to us plus 80% of the back room coatching staff would also be leaving to come to us if Sherwood was appointed manager, Which would cause huge problems at Spurs and unsettle players etc. For me Sherwood would be a much better addition then the likes of Black,Holloway, McCarthy and Shearer[/p][/quote]Agree with the post - Levy likes him and wants him to stay but AVB wants his own appointment - but I think Levy will relent if Spurs get the right level of compensation money.Three million was mentioned last week so guess that it's that figure which is the key that opens the door for Tim. Just need our owners to show some intent (and cash) and sort that out ASAP now.[/p][/quote]Utter tripe. Are you seriously suggesting for one second that Levy would consider keeping Sherwood when AvB wants him out? Or that AvB is somehow "jealous" of Sherwood? If Levy loves Deadwood so much why didn't he make HIM manager? Er because he thought he'd get a proper manager. Sherwood only got a position at Spurs because he was a mate of Jamie Redknapp's. And that is a sorry fact. But keep on believing the hype about him being hot property? Can you not see that on a basic level Tim Sherwood is scum? He's a piece of work. White bread. You are being played by Levy and it's hilarious that you can't even see it. The more he pretends to want to keep him (£3m compo I believe HAHAHA) the more you seem to believe he has some sort of talent. Levy will let him go alright. You'll pay through the nose and he'll ruin you. Deadwood's ambitious alright - but he'll have no loyalty to you lot.[/p][/quote]Wow - why are you so jealous of the possibility us getting Sherwood as our next manager? That is quite a rant even for a deluded claret. Has Howe's betrayal (almost equal to Coyle's) hurt you so badly that you need to slag-off everything Rovers do...? Just because your (ex) manager would rather go build sandcastles on Bournemouth beach rather than continue with the impossible task of building the shambles at the Turf into a football club, please do not bring your inane ramblings onto our site. anyway it may be Holloway and not Sherwood that comes to Ewood - but guess that you will have plenty to slag him off for too....maybe your next manager can be one of our dregs that we didn't want? I will ask Shebby to send you the 'not wanted' list. French Rover

2:48pm Thu 18 Oct 12

walshy2866 says...

Top10StillOn wrote:
trueblue72 wrote:
gpb501 wrote:
Rumour mill has Steve kean as a favourite to take on the Scotland job when Levine has been sacked.

Are Scotland that desperate lol!
I heard Alan brazil choke on his weetabix this am when domeone mentioned keanes name as a candidate for the Scotland job if Levine gets sacked.
His silence said it all.

He wasn't that quiet when we wanted keane out, what goes around comes around !!!
Exactly, nice one trueblue. Also like to see Charlie Nicholas' reaction if "he" gets the job as well.
P1sshead Brazil, Kean and Charlie D1ckless all p1ss in the same pot anyway, all dirty celtic supporting 5cum. Despite what they all say to get paid for another week of radio/tv drivel, they'll be a lot more interested in how the rep of Ireland team is doing. The west of Scotland is still a divided community on that front and always will be because it looks like someone's forgot to tell them The Famine Is Over , so they can all p1ss off back to their beloved country
[quote][p][bold]Top10StillOn[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]trueblue72[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]gpb501[/bold] wrote: Rumour mill has Steve kean as a favourite to take on the Scotland job when Levine has been sacked. Are Scotland that desperate lol![/p][/quote]I heard Alan brazil choke on his weetabix this am when domeone mentioned keanes name as a candidate for the Scotland job if Levine gets sacked. His silence said it all. He wasn't that quiet when we wanted keane out, what goes around comes around !!![/p][/quote]Exactly, nice one trueblue. Also like to see Charlie Nicholas' reaction if "he" gets the job as well.[/p][/quote]P1sshead Brazil, Kean and Charlie D1ckless all p1ss in the same pot anyway, all dirty celtic supporting 5cum. Despite what they all say to get paid for another week of radio/tv drivel, they'll be a lot more interested in how the rep of Ireland team is doing. The west of Scotland is still a divided community on that front and always will be because it looks like someone's forgot to tell them The Famine Is Over , so they can all p1ss off back to their beloved country walshy2866

1:48am Fri 19 Oct 12

RespectTheK-Dog says...

French Rover wrote:
RespectTheK-Dog wrote:
French Rover wrote:
Tamworth rover wrote:
RespectTheK-Dog wrote:
Riverside 7 wrote:
If Spurs wont let us speak to Sherwood and he won't walk out on them, then we've got to accept it and move on.

We should find out if OGS really wants to come to Ewood.

If he does, I'm sure that he would be worth the wait.
Of course Spurs will let you speak to Sherwood.

Daniel Levy is merely showing the chicken farmers how to conduct business.

Pretending they are so desperate to keep him - and you all fall for it - when AvB has already indicated he doesn't like him or even want him around the club!

Spurs don't even rate Sherwood. And I'm stumped if I can see why anyone else would either.
Wrong on so many levels. The reason AVB doesnt want him at the club is down to the fact that he has more respect from all players and staff at the football club and its showing him up. How can you say spurs dont even rate him when Levy wants him to become the director of football at the club and thats why hes refusing to let him speak to us plus 80% of the back room coatching staff would also be leaving to come to us if Sherwood was appointed manager, Which would cause huge problems at Spurs and unsettle players etc.

For me Sherwood would be a much better addition then the likes of Black,Holloway, McCarthy and Shearer
Agree with the post - Levy likes him and wants him to stay but AVB wants his own appointment - but I think Levy will relent if Spurs get the right level of compensation money.Three million was mentioned last week so guess that it's that figure which is the key that opens the door for Tim.
Just need our owners to show some intent (and cash) and sort that out ASAP now.
Utter tripe.

Are you seriously suggesting for one second that Levy would consider keeping Sherwood when AvB wants him out?

Or that AvB is somehow "jealous" of Sherwood?

If Levy loves Deadwood so much why didn't he make HIM manager? Er because he thought he'd get a proper manager.

Sherwood only got a position at Spurs because he was a mate of Jamie Redknapp's. And that is a sorry fact.

But keep on believing the hype about him being hot property?

Can you not see that on a basic level Tim Sherwood is scum? He's a piece of work. White bread.

You are being played by Levy and it's hilarious that you can't even see it. The more he pretends to want to keep him (£3m compo I believe HAHAHA) the more you seem to believe he has some sort of talent.

Levy will let him go alright. You'll pay through the nose and he'll ruin you. Deadwood's ambitious alright - but he'll have no loyalty to you lot.
Wow - why are you so jealous of the possibility us getting Sherwood as our next manager? That is quite a rant even for a deluded claret. Has Howe's betrayal (almost equal to Coyle's) hurt you so badly that you need to slag-off everything Rovers do...? Just because your (ex) manager would rather go build sandcastles on Bournemouth beach rather than continue with the impossible task of building the shambles at the Turf into a football club, please do not bring your inane ramblings onto our site.

anyway it may be Holloway and not Sherwood that comes to Ewood - but guess that you will have plenty to slag him off for too....maybe your next manager can be one of our dregs that we didn't want? I will ask Shebby to send you the 'not wanted' list.
No I'm not jealous of you getting Deadwood. And I don't know why you would think that.

I've gone out of my way to say why he would be a rubbish manager.

He's unproven as as yet but being as he is sub human scum I think he would damage Blackburn.

One last thing I support LEEDS.
[quote][p][bold]French Rover[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]RespectTheK-Dog[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]French Rover[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Tamworth rover[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]RespectTheK-Dog[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Riverside 7[/bold] wrote: If Spurs wont let us speak to Sherwood and he won't walk out on them, then we've got to accept it and move on. We should find out if OGS really wants to come to Ewood. If he does, I'm sure that he would be worth the wait.[/p][/quote]Of course Spurs will let you speak to Sherwood. Daniel Levy is merely showing the chicken farmers how to conduct business. Pretending they are so desperate to keep him - and you all fall for it - when AvB has already indicated he doesn't like him or even want him around the club! Spurs don't even rate Sherwood. And I'm stumped if I can see why anyone else would either.[/p][/quote]Wrong on so many levels. The reason AVB doesnt want him at the club is down to the fact that he has more respect from all players and staff at the football club and its showing him up. How can you say spurs dont even rate him when Levy wants him to become the director of football at the club and thats why hes refusing to let him speak to us plus 80% of the back room coatching staff would also be leaving to come to us if Sherwood was appointed manager, Which would cause huge problems at Spurs and unsettle players etc. For me Sherwood would be a much better addition then the likes of Black,Holloway, McCarthy and Shearer[/p][/quote]Agree with the post - Levy likes him and wants him to stay but AVB wants his own appointment - but I think Levy will relent if Spurs get the right level of compensation money.Three million was mentioned last week so guess that it's that figure which is the key that opens the door for Tim. Just need our owners to show some intent (and cash) and sort that out ASAP now.[/p][/quote]Utter tripe. Are you seriously suggesting for one second that Levy would consider keeping Sherwood when AvB wants him out? Or that AvB is somehow "jealous" of Sherwood? If Levy loves Deadwood so much why didn't he make HIM manager? Er because he thought he'd get a proper manager. Sherwood only got a position at Spurs because he was a mate of Jamie Redknapp's. And that is a sorry fact. But keep on believing the hype about him being hot property? Can you not see that on a basic level Tim Sherwood is scum? He's a piece of work. White bread. You are being played by Levy and it's hilarious that you can't even see it. The more he pretends to want to keep him (£3m compo I believe HAHAHA) the more you seem to believe he has some sort of talent. Levy will let him go alright. You'll pay through the nose and he'll ruin you. Deadwood's ambitious alright - but he'll have no loyalty to you lot.[/p][/quote]Wow - why are you so jealous of the possibility us getting Sherwood as our next manager? That is quite a rant even for a deluded claret. Has Howe's betrayal (almost equal to Coyle's) hurt you so badly that you need to slag-off everything Rovers do...? Just because your (ex) manager would rather go build sandcastles on Bournemouth beach rather than continue with the impossible task of building the shambles at the Turf into a football club, please do not bring your inane ramblings onto our site. anyway it may be Holloway and not Sherwood that comes to Ewood - but guess that you will have plenty to slag him off for too....maybe your next manager can be one of our dregs that we didn't want? I will ask Shebby to send you the 'not wanted' list.[/p][/quote]No I'm not jealous of you getting Deadwood. And I don't know why you would think that. I've gone out of my way to say why he would be a rubbish manager. He's unproven as as yet but being as he is sub human scum I think he would damage Blackburn. One last thing I support LEEDS. RespectTheK-Dog

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

Get Adobe Flash player
About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree