Brian Laws: My pain over Turf Moor exit

FORMER Burnley boss Brian Laws has described his Turf Moor sacking as the “most hurtful parting” of his career after accusing the Burnley board of not being strong enough during his troubled tenure.

The ex Clarets full back went from being the darling of the Longside during his playing days to the subject of fans ire for his 12-month spell as manager in 2010, which saw the club relegated from the Premier League.

Now, in his autobiography ‘Laws of the Jungle’, he has spoken of the hurt felt during that period and insisted Burnley were on target for their play-off objective when he was sacked in December 2010.

He admits the reaction towards him by the fans was “heartbreaking” and revealed he was asked to step down by then chairman Barry Kilby during a phone conversation from America that lasted ‘a minute’.

In the book, he wrote: “It still rankles as the most hurtful period of my career. It was the shortest phone conversation you can imagine.

“If I said it only lasted a minute that would not be overstating the case.

“We never spoke again. About an hour later, Burnley put an announcement that I was leaving. I was disappointed both with the decision and manner of it.

“I thought I had a better working relationship and understanding with the club than that. For all my love for the club over many years, this wasn’t a pleasant experience. The supporters upset me and I was dismayed at the way it ended from the club’s point of view.

“Brendan’s (Flood) reasoning was that if we lost again, the supporters would turn on the board. I thought they would have been stronger than that. We were on target for the play offs.

“Change doesn’t necessarily equal progress and what was so galling for me was that the board could have had been more supportive, especially as I was on target for our objective.”

Laws lost 22 matches of his 44 in charge at Turf and, despite challenging for a play-off spot, a 2-0 defeat at home to Scunthorpe in late December spelt the end for the manager.

He reflects though on the jeers he received at the end of the previous match, Burnley’s first win at Barnsley for 79 years, and, despite a text of support from Kilby, admits he feared the writing was on the wall.

“At the final whistle, instead of cheers, all I heard from our supporters was jeers,” he said. “That was heartbreaking. It was almost as if they were disappointed we’d won. What true supporter goes to a game with that attitude? The whole situation beggared belief.

“I wasn’t their favoured choice when I took the job. Burnley’s promotion to the Premier League had attracted a new breed of supporter and I was up against those.

“But they were willing to give me an opportunity, albeit a brief one. Their anger at Coyle’s departure was bound to be channelled somewhere and it was me who copped for it.”

In the book, which also charts his playing days at Burnley, Law described how following the defeat to Scunthorpe the boardroom door was locked and that the directors had all already left.

He said: “Any mistake by a player was seized on by supporters as an opportunity to have a go at me. Let me tell you any fan who thinks that booing will make a player better is having a laugh.

“Even at the time I went there, in mid January, the omens were stacking up against us. The team hadn’t won in the league for 10 games.

“These were not necessarily Premier League players, they were Championship players who had risen above their expectations. Eventually, there comes a stage when they are mentally drained and get demoralised. That’s what happened to Burnley.”

* Laws of the jungle was published on September 8 and has been co-written with BBC Final Score reporter Alan Biggs. It charts his days as a player at Burnley, Huddersfield, Middlesbrough and Nottingham Forest, and his management career at Grimsby, Scunthorpe, Sheffield Wednesday and Burnley.

Comments(11)

woody9229 says...
9:21am Tue 11 Sep 12

Brian Laws was not the darling of the Longside as a player no more than Coyle was a legend at BWFC. I do think though that we as fans treated him badly and in a way I am sorry about that but really Brian you must have been wetting yourself with shock at how lucky you were to get the job whilts running all the way to the bank. Biggest mistake BFC has made since selling Jimmy Mac employing you. Sorry Brian but its true. How on earth anybody would dream of buying the book is beyond me. Hope you are not relying on the proceeds of sales to keep you going.

leedsclaret says...
9:26am Tue 11 Sep 12

It's never nice when a former player returns as manager, struggles and fails to win over the fans.
I sympathise with Laws in that respect, but it is the Board that deserved all the flak for his appointment. Going for a manager who had just been sacked at a league one club showed a massive lack of ambition and would have represented a poor appointment if we had still been in the championship, let alone in the premier league.
I think the fans saw this as an admission of defeat by the Board, that we didn't belong at the highest level and this alienated and upset many people.

hollinsclaret says...
9:34am Tue 11 Sep 12

Have to agree with leedscalaret here, I was not fan of Laws but you can't really argue with what he is saying. I think the board have made some serious errors of judgement, the failure to bring in a more senior and experienced PL manager was a massive missed opportunity, to which we paid the ultimate price ! Shame on them

claretmeandyou says...
10:40am Tue 11 Sep 12

For once we Clarets same to be singing from the same hymn sheet and have at last woken up as to who was to blame for appointing Brian Laws in the first place and who is to blame for the current situation that the club find themselves in just three seasons since our Premiership days. Brendon Flood's reasoning that if the club lost again the fans would turn on the board is very interesting as I think this board has had an easy ride from the fans for quite a long time now dispite obvious gaffs like appointing Brian Laws and not spending enough money on decent players who would have kept us in the Premiership and we would still be in the Premiership today but for this no-risk taking board. Barry Kilby's one minute conversation is a joke especially when Brian had guided the team to within two points of the play-off positions. It just goes to show how insecure they were and our current situation at the club does not seem to indicate that anything has changed especially as they are already trying to tempt the stay away fans to buy silver and bronze tickets in order to stand a chance of purchasing a ticket for a match that does not take place for 12 weeks. I have news for the board ; Venky boys will not sell all their tickets and neither will we. Defeat on Saturday and Eddie and the board will need more than just their tin hats on.

fylde exile says...
11:53am Tue 11 Sep 12

Brian Laws wasn't to blame for his appointment,if anybody else had been offered a premiership managers'job at the place where he started his career would he turn it down.Laws was an excellent full back ask Notts Forest and England,only John Bond didn't seem to think so.Rumours were cicrcling in Bolton long before Coyle left here,the board should have kept him,and given him the money for the three new players he wanted,which wasn't a fortune,and just bears out what Laws says about inheriting championship players punching above their weight.It needed strenghtening.Draw a parrellel with Blackpool,one manager over a long period,lesser gates than ours,a Chairman who was also allegedly repaid for keeping them in existance,But with a much more forward looking outlook Yes I wasn't a Laws fan as a Manager but when he left we were much higher in the table than we are now.Let's hope this can be quickly redressed,but can anybody believe that three years ago we would have been where we are now and us loyal fans have been treated so badly once more.

icannotrace says...
9:04pm Tue 11 Sep 12

RUinsane wrote:
.*-----o----( 0 )----o----*
(Its all goin pear shape)

Bran laws was exactly the right man for the job. The board were aware how out of their depth they were and wanted to return to the comfort of the lower leagues. Whilst in the prem they had to do interviews on TV, now nobody cares except wing nut charles and his horse Camilla. Now you are at the correct level and the money divers can point the finger at this scapegoat.
At least the board did sack him?

beagle says...
10:21pm Tue 11 Sep 12

Rather have Laws than E H at the moment to be honest, worrying times at the turf.
UTC

forzagranata says...
12:12am Wed 12 Sep 12

Laws was treated appallingly by Burnley fans - mainly the Plastics who started going on the Turf when they got close to the Premier League.

As a kid I remember watching Laws come up through the ranks, from the youth team to the first team where he as one of our best players for years.

He wasn't an ideal choice after Coyle dropped the club in it, but he should have enjoyed better support than he got.

He was set a target of a top six finish. His team were two points off the playoffs with a game in hand - and he was sacked over the phone.

A sorry episode in Burnley's history.

I'll be interested to see when the Clarets get back to contending for a playoff spot.

no ney never says...
9:26am Wed 12 Sep 12

Nowt new here, Barry has already admitted it was his mistake appointing Brian. Owen Coyle still has his story to tell and will no doubt not be favourable to the board when the time comes for him to tell it. The board have also made some good decisions though.

Eddie and the players will get it together in pretty much the same way as last season. Hopefully this season we can maintain a longer winning streak.

Howe the lads

jellybiff says...
5:01pm Wed 12 Sep 12

As a kid I remember watching Laws come up through the ranks, from the youth team to the first team where he as one of our best players for years.jeez you are one strange person if you think that .

Phil Simpson says...
4:56am Thu 13 Sep 12

Laws is being most fair when he states that he wasn't exactly the favoured choice of successor to Owen Coyle. The board argued that they took advice from manangement consultants in terms of a cost-benefit analysis.

One has to question a) Whether accountants are the best judge of candidate for a football management position & b) bear in mind that the return on the investment of a manager is cheap to hire isn't necessarily going to keep a Premier League team in said league.

Coyle & Laws had their own strength. Coyle took a team with modest means & developed the playing staff into a force to be reckoned with in the Championship. Laws made some shrewd signings in light of the inadequate budget that he had at his disposition.

Maybe with Coyle's coaching acumen & Laws' knowledge of the transfer market, they would have made a "dream ticket". Therefore perhaps both should have been employed in the first place. Replacing one Steve Cotterill with two men of complementary qualities would have been an investment worth making.

click2find

Get Adobe Flash player
About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree