When news happens, text LT and your photos and videos to 80360. Or contact us by email or phone.
REGISTER NOW TO POST YOUR COMMENTS ON THESE STORIES
It's free and only takes a few seconds. Click here to go to the registration page.
4:50pm Saturday 28th November 2009
Blackburn Rovers took away a point in a match that never really got going.
The first half yielded very little in terms of clear-cut chances, with both defences looking more than comfortable.
Franco Di Santo had the better of the chances for the home side, while Liam Lawrence and Dean Whitehead were both kept out by Paul Robinson at the other end.
Rovers started the second the much brighter, but lacked quality, pace and a cutting edge in the final third.
Andy Wilkinson had a great chance to send the visitors ahead, but gave Blackburn a reprieve as he sliced his shot wide.
Heeding the warning sign, the home side then stormed down the other end and nearly took the lead on three occasions.
Ryan Nelsen saw his over head kick turned round the post, El-Hadji Dioufs cross come shot was tipped over and Steven Nzonzi saw his strike clatter the woodwork.
As the pace slowed Stoke came back in to it, and Dean Whitehead fluffed a golden opportunity.
Ricardo Fullers good work down the left saw him beat Gael Givet, but upon squaring the ball Whitehead sliced his effort well wide.
Back came Rovers, who despite possession couldn't find any creativity to carve any openings.
Brett Emerton enjoyin the best effort as his drive from range sailed just wide.
Returning James Beattie then shot over from inside the box, as the game ebbed away towards the finish line.
The home side enjoyed the better of the latter stages but couldn't convert of the half chances that came their way.
Chris Samba almost taking it at the death, but his headed attempt rolled wide and it ended with both sides taking away a point.
tonto, Rishton says...
5:13pm Sat 28 Nov 09
spyderleg, blackburn says...
5:19pm Sat 28 Nov 09
tonto, Rishton says...
5:50pm Sat 28 Nov 09
NICEONESUNSHINE, blackburn says...
5:56pm Sat 28 Nov 09
French Rover, Brossac France says...
6:21pm Sat 28 Nov 09
fraybentos, sheffield says...
6:34pm Sat 28 Nov 09
jeppo, huddersfield says...
6:38pm Sat 28 Nov 09
kevin e, portugal says...
7:12pm Sat 28 Nov 09
moggy669, darwen says...
7:14pm Sat 28 Nov 09
fraybentos wrote:Totally agree.
bentley back? a ten millon pound midfielder ? i think rovers have the most disillusioned fan base in the entire country, but at a guess id say that these comments come from the same half hearted fans that boo keith andrews off the pitch. lets get behind our team and players, and lets hope that big sam learns to s**t pound notes. £10 mill my ar*e
fraybentos, sheffield says...
7:15pm Sat 28 Nov 09
tonto, Rishton says...
7:18pm Sat 28 Nov 09
bed and breakfast man_!, The riverside says...
7:35pm Sat 28 Nov 09
moggy669, darwen says...
7:38pm Sat 28 Nov 09
tonto wrote:Good, niether did we.
I didn't boo or grumble or sing for Benni, however what i watched was total manure. I'm Blackburn through & through but this is painful.
French Rover, Brossac France says...
8:54pm Sat 28 Nov 09
fraybentos wrote:If you think and others on here think that a point at home to Stoke Bleeding City is a good result for us, then you must be Allardyces love child! Getting a point away at Stoke would be a bit of blow, I know we have to be realistic about our team but what you just said is plain silly and totally defeatist.
yeah sorry for the outburst mate, but sitting in the most incestus section of the riverside this season has really ground me down. i cant belive what a dissilussioned bunch we are. we have over performed for a number of years, truth is, a point to stoke IS a good result for us. i hope this small section of the ground dose not reflect the thoughts of other fans.
Tricky, Poulton-le-Fylde says...
9:57pm Sat 28 Nov 09
Woody Riversider, Blackburn says...
12:09am Sun 29 Nov 09
Miller11, Mellor says...
12:29am Sun 29 Nov 09
Miller11, Mellor says...
12:30am Sun 29 Nov 09
DarwenRover, Darwen says...
8:44am Sun 29 Nov 09
mike rover, essex says...
10:34am Sun 29 Nov 09
hawaii 5-0, AFD 2001 says...
10:44am Sun 29 Nov 09
hawaii 5-0, AFD 2001 says...
10:46am Sun 29 Nov 09
marghen, taunton says...
11:52am Sun 29 Nov 09
hawaii 5-0 wrote:yeah, but the wrong two!
Should also mention - TUFters - We played TUF for 2/3 of the game yesterday.
marghen, taunton says...
12:00pm Sun 29 Nov 09
kevin e, portugal says...
1:30pm Sun 29 Nov 09
hawaii 5-0 wrote:Good stuff Hawaii.
I see yesteday's result has got the moaners in full flow again. Not the best game but why do we have god given right to play 'teams like Stoke' off the park. French Rover - why is 4 points from 3 games against teams around us not good enough. They are around us because they are as good as us. Stoke finished higher than us last season and are in that position again, and who the hell is suggesting we get Bentley back or spend £10 million on a midfielder. Come on, let's get real! I think there's a reallity check required for some of you on here and as a negative as it sounds, in the current climate we will not be any better than a mid table team. Perhaps if a few more of you went, the board would have more money to spend. Look where we were this time last year just before Allardyce took over and look at the league table now. I challenge anyone to put up an argument to say we not in a substantially better position. God if we have the same improvement again in 12 months, we'll be challenging Europe.
kevin e, portugal says...
1:38pm Sun 29 Nov 09
French Rover wrote:I suggest that your views about Stoke are out of date French Rover.
fraybentos wrote:If you think and others on here think that a point at home to Stoke Bleeding City is a good result for us, then you must be Allardyces love child! Getting a point away at Stoke would be a bit of blow, I know we have to be realistic about our team but what you just said is plain silly and totally defeatist.
yeah sorry for the outburst mate, but sitting in the most incestus section of the riverside this season has really ground me down. i cant belive what a dissilussioned bunch we are. we have over performed for a number of years, truth is, a point to stoke IS a good result for us. i hope this small section of the ground dose not reflect the thoughts of other fans.
BlueSkies, darwen says...
2:07pm Sun 29 Nov 09
DarwenRover, Darwen says...
3:33pm Sun 29 Nov 09
zappedagain, Manchester says...
3:50pm Sun 29 Nov 09
spyderleg, blackburn says...
5:33pm Sun 29 Nov 09
kevin e wrote:The "quality" of our fans is not in question, remember the 18th oct, or were you not there? we've had two seasons of dross to contend with. even "morons" as you call them are entitled to voice their displeasure. As for Stoke being a decent side you must be easily satisfied....outside of the top five I don't think I've seen a "decent"side at Ewood this season or last for that matter. The football under Allardyce has taken a definate turn for the worse,If this entertains you, you have my sympathy. I for one think we should strive for...... and deserve better!
French Rover wrote:I suggest that your views about Stoke are out of date French Rover. . They are a decent side doing better than us in the Premiership. . I wish we had the quality of their fans' support instead of the moaning morons by which FrayBentos is surrounded. . Supporters? By definitiion, no.fraybentos wrote: yeah sorry for the outburst mate, but sitting in the most incestus section of the riverside this season has really ground me down. i cant belive what a dissilussioned bunch we are. we have over performed for a number of years, truth is, a point to stoke IS a good result for us. i hope this small section of the ground dose not reflect the thoughts of other fans.If you think and others on here think that a point at home to Stoke Bleeding City is a good result for us, then you must be Allardyces love child! Getting a point away at Stoke would be a bit of blow, I know we have to be realistic about our team but what you just said is plain silly and totally defeatist.
eddie the eagle, chorley says...
5:57pm Sun 29 Nov 09
marghen, taunton says...
6:14pm Sun 29 Nov 09
kevin e, portugal says...
8:21pm Sun 29 Nov 09
spyderleg wrote:I have no problem with fans voicing their displeasure as long as it is done in a way which is not going to spread disaffection amongst the crowd and, thereby, on to the pitch.
kevin e wrote:The "quality" of our fans is not in question, remember the 18th oct, or were you not there? we've had two seasons of dross to contend with. even "morons" as you call them are entitled to voice their displeasure. As for Stoke being a decent side you must be easily satisfied....outside of the top five I don't think I've seen a "decent"side at Ewood this season or last for that matter. The football under Allardyce has taken a definate turn for the worse,If this entertains you, you have my sympathy. I for one think we should strive for...... and deserve better!
French Rover wrote:I suggest that your views about Stoke are out of date French Rover. . They are a decent side doing better than us in the Premiership. . I wish we had the quality of their fans' support instead of the moaning morons by which FrayBentos is surrounded. . Supporters? By definitiion, no.fraybentos wrote: yeah sorry for the outburst mate, but sitting in the most incestus section of the riverside this season has really ground me down. i cant belive what a dissilussioned bunch we are. we have over performed for a number of years, truth is, a point to stoke IS a good result for us. i hope this small section of the ground dose not reflect the thoughts of other fans.If you think and others on here think that a point at home to Stoke Bleeding City is a good result for us, then you must be Allardyces love child! Getting a point away at Stoke would be a bit of blow, I know we have to be realistic about our team but what you just said is plain silly and totally defeatist.
kevin e, portugal says...
8:24pm Sun 29 Nov 09
eddie the eagle wrote:...and why do fans think we should have breezed past them?
Stoke this season have scored 4 goals and conceded 8 this season this suggests that they are very good at doing what they set out to do,get a point away and maintain their premier status.As for opinions everybody is entitled to their opinions but why in a game filled with poor performances is Andrews singled out for the boos and a lazy selfish McCarthy has fans chanting his name.
paolowhite, oswaldtwistle says...
9:34pm Sun 29 Nov 09
Miller11 wrote:Andrews is worst player at rovers i have seen, even Matty Holmes were better, I cringe when his names on the team sheet
Everyone who raves about how good our defence is... we have conceded more this season than we had at this point under Ince and Winterburn. They cannot hold their line - the captain should be ensuring this happens. They are all over the place. They got the run around off Ricardo Fuller today. Terrible. Good job stoke were as woeful in front of goal as us. Di Santo is like roberts. Good worker, bad finisher. He was played in for the second game in a row by public enemy number 1 (who also did very well after our inept defense failed miserably to play the offside trap) and squandered a good chance. We are terrible at set pieces. Pedersen should not be allowed to play, let alone take them. When we get a corner, there is barely any movement. Maybe 1 player will make a run and attack the ball. Far too static. Our midfield are INSTRUCTED TO STAY BEHIND THE BALL. Watch them, they always look to move into space at the side, not forward. This is down to Allardyce. When defending, their only objective is to get men between the ball and the goal, not to close down players. Central midfield is the least of our worries. Grella and Andrews have their limitations (which are increased thanks to Allardyce's preffered tactic of bypassing them at every opportunity), but are good at the basics and breaking up play. N'Zonzi is young and still learning, he drifts in and out of play at the moment, but has a bright future, and is proof that young players can be bloodied into the first team (lets see Hoilett get a go!) Dunn is the attacking option, and we all know what he is capable of... so long as he stays fit. Good to see Emerton playing well. Get him playing in a proper 442, as a proper winger, and he will really shine. We have nothing on the left. Pedersen is finished. What the hell is van Heerden all about? Brown envelopes would be my guess! Kalinic is looking a worse signing by the day. McCarthy must be totally disillusioned. Roberts mk. 1 has been replaced by a younger, newer model, Roberts mk. 2 who we have borrowed from a big, glamorous team, so he must be better, eh? Ince was vilified for bringing in Andrews and Fowler. There were accusations of an "old pals act" and a past it player coming for a pay day. Andrews contributes far more to the cause than Diouf, and was a far more economical purchase, who is paid a comparitively modest wage. Fowler was on a pay as you play, short term deal, as opposed to a 60k per week basic wage like our 7th choice right back from spain! The day when our management team are pleased, or at least content with a 0-0 draw at home against Stoke City is a bad one!
paolowhite, oswaldtwistle says...
9:37pm Sun 29 Nov 09
BlueSkies wrote:Andrews excellent 1st half you been on crack? or are you his dad??
I would also like to express my disgust at the treatment some of the so-called 'fans' direct at Keith Andrews. They're probably from the same line that used to boo Mark Atkins and Jason Wilcox in days gone by. . I personally thought he'd had an excellent 1st half and put in his shift which was more than could be said for some of our 'heroes'. . Stoke I thought were unfortunate not to have taken all 3 points, a mixture of laughable finishing and good goalkeeping keeping them at bay. . They soaked up our woeful, at times, attempts at attack and caught us on the break time and time again. They demonstrated something which Rovers don't have and that's PACE in their attack. They're arguably a better side than us at present. . Chelsea on Wednesday? Scary.
spyderleg, blackburn says...
8:29am Mon 30 Nov 09
kevin e wrote:So allardyce saved us did he? Looks like he'll have to do It again this season....but more likely the thing that will save us is the fact that half a dozen teams are actually worse than us. Also my memory is fine, I actually remember when the Rovers tried to win each and every home game....thats what I'll be thinking next time I moan about tactics....along with the the majority of our supporters!
spyderleg wrote:I have no problem with fans voicing their displeasure as long as it is done in a way which is not going to spread disaffection amongst the crowd and, thereby, on to the pitch. . The football under Allardyce may be 'worse' than under previous managers but the man needs time to build his team. Some people have short memories. . Had it not been for Sam we would have been in the Championship and there would have been no Oct 18th - we would have been looking up with envy at Premiership Burnley. Think of that next time you moan about Samnand his tactics.kevin e wrote:The "quality" of our fans is not in question, remember the 18th oct, or were you not there? we've had two seasons of dross to contend with. even "morons" as you call them are entitled to voice their displeasure. As for Stoke being a decent side you must be easily satisfied....outside of the top five I don't think I've seen a "decent"side at Ewood this season or last for that matter. The football under Allardyce has taken a definate turn for the worse,If this entertains you, you have my sympathy. I for one think we should strive for...... and deserve better!French Rover wrote:I suggest that your views about Stoke are out of date French Rover. . They are a decent side doing better than us in the Premiership. . I wish we had the quality of their fans' support instead of the moaning morons by which FrayBentos is surrounded. . Supporters? By definitiion, no.fraybentos wrote: yeah sorry for the outburst mate, but sitting in the most incestus section of the riverside this season has really ground me down. i cant belive what a dissilussioned bunch we are. we have over performed for a number of years, truth is, a point to stoke IS a good result for us. i hope this small section of the ground dose not reflect the thoughts of other fans.If you think and others on here think that a point at home to Stoke Bleeding City is a good result for us, then you must be Allardyces love child! Getting a point away at Stoke would be a bit of blow, I know we have to be realistic about our team but what you just said is plain silly and totally defeatist.
kevin e, portugal says...
9:19am Mon 30 Nov 09
kevin e, portugal says...
9:23am Mon 30 Nov 09
marghen, taunton says...
10:19am Mon 30 Nov 09
jeppo, huddersfield says...
10:39am Mon 30 Nov 09
marghen, taunton says...
10:47am Mon 30 Nov 09
kevin e, portugal says...
1:07pm Mon 30 Nov 09
marghen wrote:I try and watch on the internet whilst also listening to Radio Rovers.
Sorry Kevin, do you actually go to Ewood-or do you watch the games via internet/sky etc.. in sunny Portugal?
marghen, taunton says...
2:05pm Mon 30 Nov 09
kevin e, portugal says...
7:07pm Mon 30 Nov 09
marghen wrote:Hi Marghen,
Hi Kevin,
.
Look -if people haven’t the ability to come to their own conclusion about how the club/team is run, then that’s their problem, if they are influenced by other fans around them in the stands, then more fool them. At the end of the day its their choice and no matter what you or I say will change that.
.
Its obvious that there’s two camps at Ewood..the For’s & the Against’s Allardyce brigades -I’m in the latter camp-A supporter of Allardyce doesn’t automatically make them positive and at the same time being against Allardyce doesn’t make them negative- You, me or anyone else doesn’t know for certain which option is better for BRFC.
.
At the end of the day fans vote with their feet -which doesn’t necessary apply to you or a few other on here (not a dig, a fact) the Club can’t afford to lose those fans that do attend Ewood on a regularly basis, those are the same fans the club have got to listen to and take notice of- not, with all respect to fans that don’t attend games and don’t support the club financially in anyway.
.
From my perspective if, this type of football being served up at the moment continues and doesn’t improve, I most certainly will consider not renewing my season ticket(s) for next season and I wont be alone!
kevin e, portugal says...
7:17pm Mon 30 Nov 09
marghen, taunton says...
12:16am Tue 1 Dec 09
kevin e, portugal says...
8:39am Tue 1 Dec 09
marghen wrote:Hi Marghen
Nice reply Kev-just hope your football knowledge is better than your geography …hehe
kevin e, portugal says...
8:44am Tue 1 Dec 09
marghen, taunton says...
9:17am Tue 1 Dec 09
kevin e, portugal says...
12:11pm Tue 1 Dec 09
marghen, taunton says...
12:41pm Tue 1 Dec 09
kevin e, portugal says...
1:13pm Tue 1 Dec 09
marghen wrote:Hi Marghen - are you inclined to let me have your e-mail address? I will get in touch with some details. I am sure that we can help you.
Hi Kevin,
.
“property management business” very interesting- I assume that includes rentals? Been looking at Portugal for next years break….After a villa/apartment for 3 weeks from around the 11th June-walking distance to beach/bars/restauran
ts-swimming pool-A/C -& most importantly -a decent size telly with sky/English tv(someone told me it’s the world cup) Can you help?
.
Sorry everyone in advance for using this site as a travel agency.
kevin e, portugal says...
1:18pm Tue 1 Dec 09
marghen, taunton says...
1:59pm Tue 1 Dec 09
marghen, taunton says...
2:07pm Tue 1 Dec 09
Enter your postcode, town or place name
Search jobs in and around Lancashire
Search Now »
Find the right person for you
Search Now »
Search houses, flats, and all properties
Search Now »
Search new & used cars in and around Lancashire
Search Now »
French Rover, Brossac France says...
5:04pm Sat 28 Nov 09