When news happens, text LT and your photos and videos to 80360. Or contact us by email or phone.
|
|
JOIN THE DEBATE BY ADDING YOUR COMMENTS ON THESE STORIES Registering to post comments on the Lancashire Telegraph website only takes a few seconds. Click here to go to the registration page. |
1:30pm Thursday 9th July 2009 in
ACCRINGTON Stanley hope to negotiate a new deal with the Supporters’ Fund after indicating that they are unlikely to accept a proposal for a share issue.
The fund, which was set up by businessman Ilyas Khan last month in an attempt to help the club overcome financial problems, submitted a formal offer for a minority stake in Stanley on Monday.
But that proposal is still dependent on the issue of new shares – something that Stanley are reluctant to do, given that Dave O’Neill is due to become the club’s 51 per cent majority shareholder next week.
O’Neill has now paid Eric Whalley for the buy-out of his entire shareholding and will officially take over the shares once forms are signed off at the solicitors.
Stanley chief executive Rob Heys, who revealed the club plans to start publishing their accounts on a monthly basis, said: “Firstly we think the fighting fund is a great idea and there are some good business people involved, who have put a lot of money in.
“There are six or seven things they have outlined in their proposal in terms of transparency, being honest and open, that we have no issue with at all. We are happy to offer Peter Shaw (the fund’s chairman) a place on the board.
“But the share issue might be the stumbling block, because it would dilute everyone’s percentages.
“Dave has just bought the majority shareholding and it would be unfair on him to dilute that before he’s had a chance to implement his ideas.
“There are other shareholders, too, who would have to buy more shares just to maintain their percentage.
“But we’d be stupid not to look at ways around it and they’ve invited us to a meeting next Wednesday, which we’ve taken them up on. Ilyas is going to be there too.”
Comments(5)
peel parker
says...
9:00pm Thu 9 Jul 09
cast42
says...
9:06am Fri 10 Jul 09
accstan
says...
10:20am Fri 10 Jul 09
cast42 wrote:By that do you mean the members of Stanley's board or the members of the supporters fund because, believe me the needs of the club is what matters to all concerned
So, the club is to be denied money it desperately needs because the board members want to indulge their egos and play their little power games. What about putting the needs of the club first?
cast42
says...
11:21am Fri 10 Jul 09
accstan wrote:I was referring to the Stanley board members who appear to be resisting the offer from the supporter's fund because it would dilute the percentage of their shareholdings. I hope all concerned do put the interests of the club first. But, with a £25,000 tax bill to pay every month and the playing budget cut by 10%, why else would Dave O’Neill be so resistant to the offer from the supporter’s fund if he didn’t want to carry on being a big fish in a small pond with his 51% holding?
cast42 wrote: So, the club is to be denied money it desperately needs because the board members want to indulge their egos and play their little power games. What about putting the needs of the club first?By that do you mean the members of Stanley's board or the members of the supporters fund because, believe me the needs of the club is what matters to all concerned
Enter your postcode, town or place name
Search jobs in and around Lancashire
Search Now »
Find the right person for you
Search Now »
Search houses, flats, and all properties
Search Now »
Search new & used cars in and around Lancashire
Search Now »
ASFC 1 says...
6:20pm Thu 9 Jul 09