When news happens, text LT and your photos and videos to 80360. Or contact us by email or phone.
10:17am Tuesday 20th January 2009 in Sport
By Andy Cryer, Blackburn Rovers reporter
SAM Allardyce has put a £40million price tag on Roque Santa Cruz after claiming that is the amount at stake in the forthcoming Premier League relegation battle.
The Rovers boss has again warned Manchester City off their pursuit of the Paraguayan striker and insists it is a “certainty” Santa Cruz will be remaining at Ewood Park this season.
The Eastlands outfit have so far seen three bids rejected for Santa Cruz, the latest being in the region of £16m, but Allardyce warns they are still nowhere near Rovers’ own valuation.
He said: “The bottom line is, we don't want to sell Roque Santa Cruz.
“For me, we won't be selling Roque Santa Cruz, that's a certainty.
"The money is no good to me at this stage of the season.
"Roque Santa Cruz is more valuable to me and more valuable to Blackburn Rovers than the money, whoever might offer.
“There's £40m at stake [to stay] in the Premier League per year and I don't think anyone is going to offer us £40m for Roque Santa Cruz.
"The value of Roque as a player for us is far greater than what anyone could give us in terms of money."”
Manchester City have stunned the world of football this month with a £100m bid for Brazilian ace Kaka as they look to buy their way to the top of the game.
While Craig Bellamy is the latest big-money buy joining Mark Hughes’ revolution, Rovers continue to resist all attempts to prise away their talisman.
Santa Cruz himself has stated his desire to join up with Hughes again this month on several occasions but Allardyce has refused to budge in his stance on the situation.
When asked though if he would be happy to take the £40m, Allardyce added: “I think I would, yes.
“I think I'd have to. I don't think the board would take too kindly to me saying 'No, I'm still not taking that'."”
Rovers and City are believed to have kept contact throughout the last few weeks as Mark Hughes’ side looked for ways to make their efforts for Santa Cruz end in success.
A lack of an obvious replacement available in the transfer market at the moment though has heightened Rovers resolve to hang on to the striker, as they realise the importance of maintaining their Premier League status.
Santa Cruz will be allowed to leave this summer though if a club offers enough to trigger a release clause on his contract, believed to be around £20m.
Comments(33)
Tatts
says...
10:53am Tue 20 Jan 09
NickH1982
says...
10:58am Tue 20 Jan 09
Robbie
says...
11:00am Tue 20 Jan 09
A Darener
says...
11:06am Tue 20 Jan 09
NickH1982
says...
11:07am Tue 20 Jan 09
NickH1982
says...
11:09am Tue 20 Jan 09
A Darener wrote:Id rather Kaka went united..
Kaka not going to City, reminds me of when Keane said no to Rovers. Perhaps he is going to United. Now that would be funny.
mshaw28
says...
11:21am Tue 20 Jan 09
NickH1982
says...
11:25am Tue 20 Jan 09
Robbie
says...
11:26am Tue 20 Jan 09
northernmonkey1981
says...
11:27am Tue 20 Jan 09
Robbie wrote:I agree although I reckon we could get 20 for him. Regardless of whether he goes or not, this puts his profile up and indirectly the clubs which is obviously good for us. Thats what i think Ac Milan are doing with kaka. "look at our player, people want him, he must be good, come see our team and watch us on Sky Sports and T'tanta." Although i doubt they have t'tanta in Italy. Or that annoying bird off bb advertising it.
40 million is not going to happen, sell him for 18 million and be done with it.
riono5
says...
11:28am Tue 20 Jan 09
Miller11
says...
11:35am Tue 20 Jan 09
Merlin The Voice of Reason
says...
11:39am Tue 20 Jan 09
jeppo
says...
11:42am Tue 20 Jan 09
NickH1982
says...
11:46am Tue 20 Jan 09
mshaw28
says...
12:03pm Tue 20 Jan 09
Merlin The Voice of Reason wrote:What ever next? - Newsflash from the LET - David Bentley leaves Rovers!!!!!
Old News. This was in the nationals yesterday and over the weekend.
Another LT copy and paste job!
Is this what they learn on their journalism courses these days?
Stone Cold Steve Austin
says...
12:08pm Tue 20 Jan 09
NickH1982
says...
12:12pm Tue 20 Jan 09
mshaw28 wrote:Pennant, we should hijack the pompey deal
Merlin The Voice of Reason wrote: Old News. This was in the nationals yesterday and over the weekend. Another LT copy and paste job! Is this what they learn on their journalism courses these days?What ever next? - Newsflash from the LET - David Bentley leaves Rovers!!!!! Who would we like to see on the right wing boys and girls? Haven't really heard any transfer rumors recently as to the potential right winger which we desperately need
NickH1982
says...
12:16pm Tue 20 Jan 09
BR FC
says...
12:21pm Tue 20 Jan 09
Robbie wrote:Nah, only if Blackburn were gauranteed premiership survival would you do this.
40 million is not going to happen, sell him for 18 million and be done with it.
mshaw28
says...
12:23pm Tue 20 Jan 09
Stone Cold Steve Austin wrote:He wont be leaving Ewoiod for less than £18m in the summer. I've heard thats the only clause in his contract, and if doenst want to play for us and no one wants to give us the full amount i'm sure Sam will put the lad in the reserves.
I agree with Sam 100 percent. Not only that, but look at City. How desperate are they getting? To sell Cruz to what now amounts to a serious relegation rival would be the worst piece of business ever. If we wait till summer then we can get at least £15m as teams like Villa,Everton etc may well join the queue for his services. With that amount of money at his disposal, Sam will bring in some quality replacements.
Anyone going to Sunderland - £15quid a tkt is great value providing we put a decent side out. We have a great chance with the cup this season.
NickH1982
says...
12:26pm Tue 20 Jan 09
Miller11
says...
12:49pm Tue 20 Jan 09
mshaw28
says...
1:20pm Tue 20 Jan 09
Miller11 wrote:Totally agree and get the picture of Ince removed at the top of this page!!!!
Message to the Lancashire Telegraph -
Why do you keep deleting posts off these forums?
I can understand the ones with foul language and abuse, but what really winds me up is the lack of consistency.
Burnley fans come on here, posting silly, senseless things about Rovers and their fans. They are obviously written by mindless morons with no wit, intelligence, or even a basic grasp of English.
As soon as there is a retaliatory comment from Rovers (which are generally well articulated and amusing) they are quickly deleted.
Even if they are free from foul language.
Do you feel the need to protect the inferior? Very noble. Hardly fair though is it?
I've also seen you allow comments stating that 9/11 was a "Jewish conspiracy", yet you remove posts that say people from Burnley are incestuous?? Unbelievable.
Morst the 88th min Heartbreaker
says...
1:55pm Tue 20 Jan 09
Morst the 88th min Heartbreaker
says...
2:12pm Tue 20 Jan 09
bed and breakfast man !
says...
2:25pm Tue 20 Jan 09
Morst the 88th min Heartbreaker wrote:Who else is banging the door down for RSC ?.....NOBODY...!!!
Take the £20m and run. We won't get £10m from anyone else. 31 YEARS AND COUNTING!
Wild Rover
says...
2:44pm Tue 20 Jan 09
NickH1982
says...
4:40pm Tue 20 Jan 09
Merlin The Voice of Reason
says...
11:26pm Tue 20 Jan 09
Miller11 wrote:Maybe the editor is a Claret!
Message to the Lancashire Telegraph -
Why do you keep deleting posts off these forums?
I can understand the ones with foul language and abuse, but what really winds me up is the lack of consistency.
Burnley fans come on here, posting silly, senseless things about Rovers and their fans. They are obviously written by mindless morons with no wit, intelligence, or even a basic grasp of English.
As soon as there is a retaliatory comment from Rovers (which are generally well articulated and amusing) they are quickly deleted.
Even if they are free from foul language.
Do you feel the need to protect the inferior? Very noble. Hardly fair though is it?
I've also seen you allow comments stating that 9/11 was a "Jewish conspiracy", yet you remove posts that say people from Burnley are incestuous?? Unbelievable.
oneofthe6000
says...
12:15am Wed 21 Jan 09
BR FC wrote:Hughes won't be there in Summer!
Robbie wrote: 40 million is not going to happen, sell him for 18 million and be done with it.Nah, only if Blackburn were gauranteed premiership survival would you do this. From a Risk point of view, Sam's comments are spot on. Hughes will still want him in summer.
Morst the 88th min Heartbreaker
says...
8:39am Wed 21 Jan 09
NickH1982 wrote:"The Stars go Blue" by Ryan Adams for me.
Who like the song that the team come out to? the wild rover one
I think that "The final Countdown" was much better, dont you guys think?
Fred Storm
says...
3:56pm Wed 21 Jan 09
Merlin The Voice of Reason wrote:Merlin talks sense:
Miller11 wrote: Message to the Lancashire Telegraph - Why do you keep deleting posts off these forums? I can understand the ones with foul language and abuse, but what really winds me up is the lack of consistency. Burnley fans come on here, posting silly, senseless things about Rovers and their fans. They are obviously written by mindless morons with no wit, intelligence, or even a basic grasp of English. As soon as there is a retaliatory comment from Rovers (which are generally well articulated and amusing) they are quickly deleted. Even if they are free from foul language. Do you feel the need to protect the inferior? Very noble. Hardly fair though is it? I've also seen you allow comments stating that 9/11 was a "Jewish conspiracy", yet you remove posts that say people from Burnley are incestuous?? Unbelievable.Maybe the editor is a Claret! It is well-known that some of the senior staff in BBC Sport, and some London-based tabloid journos, are Clarets, which might explain why Rovers are nearly always last on MOTD (unless playing a top four side) and why some of the press have it in for us.
Search jobs in and around Lancashire
Search Now »
Find the right person for you
Search Now »
Search houses, flats, and all properties
Search Now »
Search new & used cars in and around Lancashire
Search Now »
Comment now! Register or sign in below.
Log in with us
Fields marked with * are mandatory.
Or
Log in with