Lancashire TelegraphBurnley bound for Austria in pre-season (From Lancashire Telegraph)

When news happens, text LT and your photos and videos to 80360. Or contact us by email or phone.

Burnley bound for Austria in pre-season

Lancashire Telegraph: Burnley bound for Austria in pre-season Burnley bound for Austria in pre-season

BURNLEY will prepare for the Premier League with a pre-season training camp in Austria, and game against Austrian opposition.

The newly promoted Clarets will travel to mainland Europe from July 14 to 21, rounding off the trip with a friendly against FC Grossklein on July 20.

FC GroßKlein, who play in the Styrian championship, are located around two hours south of Vienna and close to Graz.

It is the first pre-season friendly to be confirmed for Burnley.

Ticket prices are as follows: 50 Euros (VIP) includes hospitality, food and beverages; 12 Euros Adult; 6 Euros Children.

All ticket orders are at the disposal of Mr. Zirngast (hans.zirngast@gmxt.at).

Comments (22)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

5:57pm Thu 8 May 14

BurnleyBred says...

Quick question for the LET. When will you reverse the order of the two team crests at the top of your football pages? Given the relative standing of the two teams, Burnley should logically come first. No more hiding behind alphabetical order!
Quick question for the LET. When will you reverse the order of the two team crests at the top of your football pages? Given the relative standing of the two teams, Burnley should logically come first. No more hiding behind alphabetical order! BurnleyBred
  • Score: 15

6:25pm Thu 8 May 14

AnotherPounding4Burnley says...

BurnleyBred wrote:
Quick question for the LET. When will you reverse the order of the two team crests at the top of your football pages? Given the relative standing of the two teams, Burnley should logically come first. No more hiding behind alphabetical order!
when you can pull more than 25,000 at a home game, and won the premier league in the last 30 years, then we will change it gladly.
[quote][p][bold]BurnleyBred[/bold] wrote: Quick question for the LET. When will you reverse the order of the two team crests at the top of your football pages? Given the relative standing of the two teams, Burnley should logically come first. No more hiding behind alphabetical order![/p][/quote]when you can pull more than 25,000 at a home game, and won the premier league in the last 30 years, then we will change it gladly. AnotherPounding4Burnley
  • Score: -18

7:09pm Thu 8 May 14

AnotherPounding4Burnley says...

As you have better away support than at home it will give you the opportunity of getting more than 15K
As you have better away support than at home it will give you the opportunity of getting more than 15K AnotherPounding4Burnley
  • Score: -14

7:23pm Thu 8 May 14

jim 2012 says...

BurnleyBred wrote:
Quick question for the LET. When will you reverse the order of the two team crests at the top of your football pages? Given the relative standing of the two teams, Burnley should logically come first. No more hiding behind alphabetical order!
when burnley get relegated next season there will no need to change anything
[quote][p][bold]BurnleyBred[/bold] wrote: Quick question for the LET. When will you reverse the order of the two team crests at the top of your football pages? Given the relative standing of the two teams, Burnley should logically come first. No more hiding behind alphabetical order![/p][/quote]when burnley get relegated next season there will no need to change anything jim 2012
  • Score: -14

7:40pm Thu 8 May 14

Chris P Bacon says...

Remember lads; SOLIDARITY. Don't feed these low-life trolls (troll? It's entirely possible it's one and the same odious life-form) as they get off on the misery they think they're dishing out.

Buck the fegrudgers!
Remember lads; SOLIDARITY. Don't feed these low-life trolls (troll? It's entirely possible it's one and the same odious life-form) as they get off on the misery they think they're dishing out. Buck the fegrudgers! Chris P Bacon
  • Score: 12

7:49pm Thu 8 May 14

slants says...

so the money grabbing starts lol
so the money grabbing starts lol slants
  • Score: -3

11:57pm Thu 8 May 14

FCBurnley says...

STAYING UP FOREVER
STAYING UP FOREVER FCBurnley
  • Score: 5

8:28am Fri 9 May 14

34 years says...

FCBurnley wrote:
STAYING UP FOREVER
34 years
[quote][p][bold]FCBurnley[/bold] wrote: STAYING UP FOREVER[/p][/quote]34 years 34 years
  • Score: -4

8:42am Fri 9 May 14

RobH2O says...

34 years; its gone and forgotten. Move on. Get behind your team. Stand by them in the appalling times to come. We'll never play you again.
34 years; its gone and forgotten. Move on. Get behind your team. Stand by them in the appalling times to come. We'll never play you again. RobH2O
  • Score: 5

9:15am Fri 9 May 14

RobH2O says...

slants wrote:
so the money grabbing starts lol
Earned as opposed to injected as in the case of Rovers.
[quote][p][bold]slants[/bold] wrote: so the money grabbing starts lol[/p][/quote]Earned as opposed to injected as in the case of Rovers. RobH2O
  • Score: 3

9:16am Fri 9 May 14

RobH2O says...

jim 2012 wrote:
BurnleyBred wrote:
Quick question for the LET. When will you reverse the order of the two team crests at the top of your football pages? Given the relative standing of the two teams, Burnley should logically come first. No more hiding behind alphabetical order!
when burnley get relegated next season there will no need to change anything
So there is in the meantime then. I agree. Numpty.
[quote][p][bold]jim 2012[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]BurnleyBred[/bold] wrote: Quick question for the LET. When will you reverse the order of the two team crests at the top of your football pages? Given the relative standing of the two teams, Burnley should logically come first. No more hiding behind alphabetical order![/p][/quote]when burnley get relegated next season there will no need to change anything[/p][/quote]So there is in the meantime then. I agree. Numpty. RobH2O
  • Score: 3

9:25am Fri 9 May 14

RobH2O says...

AnotherPounding4Burn
ley
wrote:
BurnleyBred wrote:
Quick question for the LET. When will you reverse the order of the two team crests at the top of your football pages? Given the relative standing of the two teams, Burnley should logically come first. No more hiding behind alphabetical order!
when you can pull more than 25,000 at a home game, and won the premier league in the last 30 years, then we will change it gladly.
"and won the Premier League in the last 30 years" - you are so thick it beggars all description. You cannot acquire an honour retrospectively. And you could not have won the Prem prior to 1992, so 30 years is excrement too.

If you actually meant that it'll take us 30 years of future Prem presence, starting now, then that's another prediction - and you know just what a useless Nostradamus you are.
[quote][p][bold]AnotherPounding4Burn ley[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]BurnleyBred[/bold] wrote: Quick question for the LET. When will you reverse the order of the two team crests at the top of your football pages? Given the relative standing of the two teams, Burnley should logically come first. No more hiding behind alphabetical order![/p][/quote]when you can pull more than 25,000 at a home game, and won the premier league in the last 30 years, then we will change it gladly.[/p][/quote]"and won the Premier League in the last 30 years" - you are so thick it beggars all description. You cannot acquire an honour retrospectively. And you could not have won the Prem prior to 1992, so 30 years is excrement too. If you actually meant that it'll take us 30 years of future Prem presence, starting now, then that's another prediction - and you know just what a useless Nostradamus you are. RobH2O
  • Score: 3

10:00am Fri 9 May 14

Super_Clarets says...

34 years wrote:
FCBurnley wrote:
STAYING UP FOREVER
34 years
There, there, I know its hard for some of you goons to let it go, but let it go you must. It's time to move on and change the user name that has served you so well in the past.

You surrendered your 34 year comfort blanket on March 9th 2014, a date forever etched in the minds of all no-dads as your entire world imploded. It wasn't just a nightmare, it REALLY DID HAPPEN.

Burnley are PREMIER LEAGUE, Blackburn Rovers are £60million in debt and heading the same way as Portsmouth.

Cheerio!
[quote][p][bold]34 years[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]FCBurnley[/bold] wrote: STAYING UP FOREVER[/p][/quote]34 years[/p][/quote]There, there, I know its hard for some of you goons to let it go, but let it go you must. It's time to move on and change the user name that has served you so well in the past. You surrendered your 34 year comfort blanket on March 9th 2014, a date forever etched in the minds of all no-dads as your entire world imploded. It wasn't just a nightmare, it REALLY DID HAPPEN. Burnley are PREMIER LEAGUE, Blackburn Rovers are £60million in debt and heading the same way as Portsmouth. Cheerio! Super_Clarets
  • Score: 8

10:15am Fri 9 May 14

Fan@clared says...

AnotherPounding4Burn
ley
wrote:
BurnleyBred wrote:
Quick question for the LET. When will you reverse the order of the two team crests at the top of your football pages? Given the relative standing of the two teams, Burnley should logically come first. No more hiding behind alphabetical order!
when you can pull more than 25,000 at a home game, and won the premier league in the last 30 years, then we will change it gladly.
Interesting. The ground doesn’t hold 25,000 you plank. See what your attendances are next reason. Are you season tickets still being given away by the Cluckmiesters from Pune?
[quote][p][bold]AnotherPounding4Burn ley[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]BurnleyBred[/bold] wrote: Quick question for the LET. When will you reverse the order of the two team crests at the top of your football pages? Given the relative standing of the two teams, Burnley should logically come first. No more hiding behind alphabetical order![/p][/quote]when you can pull more than 25,000 at a home game, and won the premier league in the last 30 years, then we will change it gladly.[/p][/quote]Interesting. The ground doesn’t hold 25,000 you plank. See what your attendances are next reason. Are you season tickets still being given away by the Cluckmiesters from Pune? Fan@clared
  • Score: 3

10:16am Fri 9 May 14

Fan@clared says...

34 years wrote:
FCBurnley wrote:
STAYING UP FOREVER
34 years
5 years and counting.
[quote][p][bold]34 years[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]FCBurnley[/bold] wrote: STAYING UP FOREVER[/p][/quote]34 years[/p][/quote]5 years and counting. Fan@clared
  • Score: 4

10:28am Fri 9 May 14

houseclaret says...

34 years wrote:
FCBurnley wrote:
STAYING UP FOREVER
34 years
How sad. Is that all you have left? How very, very sad.
[quote][p][bold]34 years[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]FCBurnley[/bold] wrote: STAYING UP FOREVER[/p][/quote]34 years[/p][/quote]How sad. Is that all you have left? How very, very sad. houseclaret
  • Score: 2

10:29am Fri 9 May 14

RobH2O says...

houseclaret wrote:
34 years wrote:
FCBurnley wrote:
STAYING UP FOREVER
34 years
How sad. Is that all you have left? How very, very sad.
Hi House Claret. Actually, I think its bloody marvellous! Enjoy the summer!
[quote][p][bold]houseclaret[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]34 years[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]FCBurnley[/bold] wrote: STAYING UP FOREVER[/p][/quote]34 years[/p][/quote]How sad. Is that all you have left? How very, very sad.[/p][/quote]Hi House Claret. Actually, I think its bloody marvellous! Enjoy the summer! RobH2O
  • Score: 2

11:17am Fri 9 May 14

houseclaret says...

RobH2O wrote:
houseclaret wrote:
34 years wrote:
FCBurnley wrote:
STAYING UP FOREVER
34 years
How sad. Is that all you have left? How very, very sad.
Hi House Claret. Actually, I think its bloody marvellous! Enjoy the summer!
Sure will mate. It's world cup time and I will be in the country of the reigning champions when it kicks off. Planning to watch England's first two games in a great little bar (or two).
And then it's back to premier league football. Incidentally what does anyone think of making a move for Ross McCormack from Leeds? Reckon he won't want to stay at that shower at the moment. Speaking of showers, maybe a move for Rhodes would be a good idea, what with FFP and all that.
[quote][p][bold]RobH2O[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]houseclaret[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]34 years[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]FCBurnley[/bold] wrote: STAYING UP FOREVER[/p][/quote]34 years[/p][/quote]How sad. Is that all you have left? How very, very sad.[/p][/quote]Hi House Claret. Actually, I think its bloody marvellous! Enjoy the summer![/p][/quote]Sure will mate. It's world cup time and I will be in the country of the reigning champions when it kicks off. Planning to watch England's first two games in a great little bar (or two). And then it's back to premier league football. Incidentally what does anyone think of making a move for Ross McCormack from Leeds? Reckon he won't want to stay at that shower at the moment. Speaking of showers, maybe a move for Rhodes would be a good idea, what with FFP and all that. houseclaret
  • Score: 2

11:21am Fri 9 May 14

RobH2O says...

houseclaret wrote:
RobH2O wrote:
houseclaret wrote:
34 years wrote:
FCBurnley wrote:
STAYING UP FOREVER
34 years
How sad. Is that all you have left? How very, very sad.
Hi House Claret. Actually, I think its bloody marvellous! Enjoy the summer!
Sure will mate. It's world cup time and I will be in the country of the reigning champions when it kicks off. Planning to watch England's first two games in a great little bar (or two).
And then it's back to premier league football. Incidentally what does anyone think of making a move for Ross McCormack from Leeds? Reckon he won't want to stay at that shower at the moment. Speaking of showers, maybe a move for Rhodes would be a good idea, what with FFP and all that.
Well, most Prem clubs have five forwards. If the tom-toms are to be believed Mr Dyche has £16m to spend spread over this summer and Jan 15 transfer windows. I for one would see both of these players as legitimate targets.
[quote][p][bold]houseclaret[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]RobH2O[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]houseclaret[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]34 years[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]FCBurnley[/bold] wrote: STAYING UP FOREVER[/p][/quote]34 years[/p][/quote]How sad. Is that all you have left? How very, very sad.[/p][/quote]Hi House Claret. Actually, I think its bloody marvellous! Enjoy the summer![/p][/quote]Sure will mate. It's world cup time and I will be in the country of the reigning champions when it kicks off. Planning to watch England's first two games in a great little bar (or two). And then it's back to premier league football. Incidentally what does anyone think of making a move for Ross McCormack from Leeds? Reckon he won't want to stay at that shower at the moment. Speaking of showers, maybe a move for Rhodes would be a good idea, what with FFP and all that.[/p][/quote]Well, most Prem clubs have five forwards. If the tom-toms are to be believed Mr Dyche has £16m to spend spread over this summer and Jan 15 transfer windows. I for one would see both of these players as legitimate targets. RobH2O
  • Score: 2

11:29am Fri 9 May 14

midas says...

RobH2O wrote:
houseclaret wrote:
RobH2O wrote:
houseclaret wrote:
34 years wrote:
FCBurnley wrote: STAYING UP FOREVER
34 years
How sad. Is that all you have left? How very, very sad.
Hi House Claret. Actually, I think its bloody marvellous! Enjoy the summer!
Sure will mate. It's world cup time and I will be in the country of the reigning champions when it kicks off. Planning to watch England's first two games in a great little bar (or two). And then it's back to premier league football. Incidentally what does anyone think of making a move for Ross McCormack from Leeds? Reckon he won't want to stay at that shower at the moment. Speaking of showers, maybe a move for Rhodes would be a good idea, what with FFP and all that.
Well, most Prem clubs have five forwards. If the tom-toms are to be believed Mr Dyche has £16m to spend spread over this summer and Jan 15 transfer windows. I for one would see both of these players as legitimate targets.
I thinbk Gestede would be good cover for Vokes and Barnes and Spurr would be good cover for Mee and Laffertey
[quote][p][bold]RobH2O[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]houseclaret[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]RobH2O[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]houseclaret[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]34 years[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]FCBurnley[/bold] wrote: STAYING UP FOREVER[/p][/quote]34 years[/p][/quote]How sad. Is that all you have left? How very, very sad.[/p][/quote]Hi House Claret. Actually, I think its bloody marvellous! Enjoy the summer![/p][/quote]Sure will mate. It's world cup time and I will be in the country of the reigning champions when it kicks off. Planning to watch England's first two games in a great little bar (or two). And then it's back to premier league football. Incidentally what does anyone think of making a move for Ross McCormack from Leeds? Reckon he won't want to stay at that shower at the moment. Speaking of showers, maybe a move for Rhodes would be a good idea, what with FFP and all that.[/p][/quote]Well, most Prem clubs have five forwards. If the tom-toms are to be believed Mr Dyche has £16m to spend spread over this summer and Jan 15 transfer windows. I for one would see both of these players as legitimate targets.[/p][/quote]I thinbk Gestede would be good cover for Vokes and Barnes and Spurr would be good cover for Mee and Laffertey midas
  • Score: 5

12:36pm Fri 9 May 14

Super_Clarets says...

Realistically I think only Rhodes has the potential to step up to our level, I don't really rate the rest of the Blackburn squad that highly.

It's an interesting one though, as is McCormack who I would love to see join us. The thing with Rhodes is that he would jump at the chance of a move, and only his obscene salary would be in the way, but then again with sensible clauses in any contract its a possibility, and given Blackburn's dire financial outlook I think he'll be available for far less than people think, between £4 - 5million perhaps. There is also the option of a season long loan.

Other players I would like to see linked are Aaron Cresswell and possibly Will Hughes but that one of course depends on the play-off situation.

Considering what Sean Dyche has done with just £400k, the thought of him having £16million to strengthen the squad with is quite a prospect.
Realistically I think only Rhodes has the potential to step up to our level, I don't really rate the rest of the Blackburn squad that highly. It's an interesting one though, as is McCormack who I would love to see join us. The thing with Rhodes is that he would jump at the chance of a move, and only his obscene salary would be in the way, but then again with sensible clauses in any contract its a possibility, and given Blackburn's dire financial outlook I think he'll be available for far less than people think, between £4 - 5million perhaps. There is also the option of a season long loan. Other players I would like to see linked are Aaron Cresswell and possibly Will Hughes but that one of course depends on the play-off situation. Considering what Sean Dyche has done with just £400k, the thought of him having £16million to strengthen the squad with is quite a prospect. Super_Clarets
  • Score: 2

12:38pm Fri 9 May 14

houseclaret says...

Can you imagine if we got Rhodes or Gestede? You wouldn't be able to hear yourself think for the noise of jealous ones throwing themselves off tall buildings (I suggest the town hall for anyone who considers it).
Can you imagine if we got Rhodes or Gestede? You wouldn't be able to hear yourself think for the noise of jealous ones throwing themselves off tall buildings (I suggest the town hall for anyone who considers it). houseclaret
  • Score: 2

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

Get Adobe Flash player
About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree