Burnley boss won't waste cash (From Lancashire Telegraph)

Because Kilby decided to take back the 3.2 million we owed him for the grounds out of the 3.16 million we were in the black.And decided that the transfer window was an ideal time to do this.What about that'initial'40 million pumped in by the Russian billionaire ?

How can Kilby decide, he isn't the Chairman? Who is this Russian billionaire you know? How much would you like the club to spend?

midas wrote:
How can Kilby decide, he isn't the Chairman? Who is this Russian billionaire you know? How much would you like the club to spend?

You have hit the nail on the head with that comment,it's all a farce.Quite clearly you dont follow the club very well if you haven't heard about the Russian!!!

We have the right players and great competition - why waste money? Russian billionaire - like that's going to happen!

claret777 wrote:

midas wrote:
How can Kilby decide, he isn't the Chairman? Who is this Russian billionaire you know? How much would you like the club to spend?

You have hit the nail on the head with that comment,it's all a farce.Quite clearly you dont follow the club very well if you haven't heard about the Russian!!!

Let's sell OUR grounds with a 99 year lease then buy OUR own grounds back a few year later ???????? Even ex players are saying its a farce,there again Midas seems to be some kind of Einstein mixed with clever remarks.

claret777 wrote:

midas wrote:
How can Kilby decide, he isn't the Chairman? Who is this Russian billionaire you know? How much would you like the club to spend?

You have hit the nail on the head with that comment,it's all a farce.Quite clearly you dont follow the club very well if you haven't heard about the Russian!!!

Really? The last I heard was that John Sullivan was going over to Russia to try and tempt some Obliarch to invest - where did this 'initial £40 million' come from then?

What is the Russian's name - or is he just called 'The Russian'?

Blackburn fans love horses wrote:

claret777 wrote:

midas wrote:
How can Kilby decide, he isn't the Chairman? Who is this Russian billionaire you know? How much would you like the club to spend?

You have hit the nail on the head with that comment,it's all a farce.Quite clearly you dont follow the club very well if you haven't heard about the Russian!!!

Really? The last I heard was that John Sullivan was going over to Russia to try and tempt some Obliarch to invest - where did this 'initial £40 million' come from then?

What is the Russian's name - or is he just called 'The Russian'?

Does we need to know his name ? He's a billionaire and he's Russian,hence 'the Russian'.

Ahh right, so he doesn't exist then?

investors may or may not exist in the future. To date however nothing has been arranged or agreed.

Strewth some people are just too dim. How do you have the option of wasting money, when you haven't been given any?
Give me strength.

claret777 wrote:

midas wrote: How can Kilby decide, he isn't the Chairman? Who is this Russian billionaire you know? How much would you like the club to spend?

You have hit the nail on the head with that comment,it's all a farce.Quite clearly you dont follow the club very well if you haven't heard about the Russian!!!

i follow the club, you obviously follow the Burnley Express. Come on, tell us all about this Russian as you must be "in the know"!!
.
We sold our ground when we had no money and were in danger of going into administration. We pay over £300k per year rent, why not buy it back?

midas wrote:

claret777 wrote:

midas wrote: How can Kilby decide, he isn't the Chairman? Who is this Russian billionaire you know? How much would you like the club to spend?

You have hit the nail on the head with that comment,it's all a farce.Quite clearly you dont follow the club very well if you haven't heard about the Russian!!!

i follow the club, you obviously follow the Burnley Express. Come on, tell us all about this Russian as you must be "in the know"!!
.
We sold our ground when we had no money and were in danger of going into administration. We pay over £300k per year rent, why not buy it back?

You're right bud. Since Kilby took over and Teasdale to an extent, this club has always been run within its means. The board invest as much as they can but some fans think that they should just pump money in constantly.
Some of them are wealthy chaps but they're not in a position where they can afford to miss a couple of million quid.
I hope that we're not serious about foreign owners. Look at that laughing stock down the road/ Pompey/hearts etc

TodClaret wrote:

midas wrote:

claret777 wrote:

midas wrote: How can Kilby decide, he isn't the Chairman? Who is this Russian billionaire you know? How much would you like the club to spend?

You have hit the nail on the head with that comment,it's all a farce.Quite clearly you dont follow the club very well if you haven't heard about the Russian!!!

i follow the club, you obviously follow the Burnley Express. Come on, tell us all about this Russian as you must be "in the know"!!
.
We sold our ground when we had no money and were in danger of going into administration. We pay over £300k per year rent, why not buy it back?

You're right bud. Since Kilby took over and Teasdale to an extent, this club has always been run within its means. The board invest as much as they can but some fans think that they should just pump money in constantly.
Some of them are wealthy chaps but they're not in a position where they can afford to miss a couple of million quid.
I hope that we're not serious about foreign owners. Look at that laughing stock down the road/ Pompey/hearts etc

Not in a position to miss a couple of million ? Van der Schaff paid over a million pound in wages for 1 appearance for the club,Leon Cort,1.5 million plus wages,and many more.All of a sudden though we cant afford to miss a couple of million all of a sudden ? Remember what Kilby said' It's not a massive amount to pay back,around 3.2 million!!!! So what's 2 million if that's not a massive amount ? Oh,and at the time he said we didn't need to win promotion to the prem to afford it either.

Two very good examples of why you shouldn't buy players (especially in the Jan window) yet you want the club to buy someone just because money should available!
.
Its not Football Manager you know!

claret777 wrote:

TodClaret wrote:

midas wrote:

claret777 wrote:

midas wrote: How can Kilby decide, he isn't the Chairman? Who is this Russian billionaire you know? How much would you like the club to spend?

You have hit the nail on the head with that comment,it's all a farce.Quite clearly you dont follow the club very well if you haven't heard about the Russian!!!

i follow the club, you obviously follow the Burnley Express. Come on, tell us all about this Russian as you must be "in the know"!!
.
We sold our ground when we had no money and were in danger of going into administration. We pay over £300k per year rent, why not buy it back?

You're right bud. Since Kilby took over and Teasdale to an extent, this club has always been run within its means. The board invest as much as they can but some fans think that they should just pump money in constantly.
Some of them are wealthy chaps but they're not in a position where they can afford to miss a couple of million quid.
I hope that we're not serious about foreign owners. Look at that laughing stock down the road/ Pompey/hearts etc

Not in a position to miss a couple of million ? Van der Schaff paid over a million pound in wages for 1 appearance for the club,Leon Cort,1.5 million plus wages,and many more.All of a sudden though we cant afford to miss a couple of million all of a sudden ? Remember what Kilby said' It's not a massive amount to pay back,around 3.2 million!!!! So what's 2 million if that's not a massive amount ? Oh,and at the time he said we didn't need to win promotion to the prem to afford it either.

Hi Tetley.

Different username,same old boring anti-BFC board guff

claret777 wrote:

TodClaret wrote:

midas wrote:

claret777 wrote:

midas wrote: How can Kilby decide, he isn't the Chairman? Who is this Russian billionaire you know? How much would you like the club to spend?

You have hit the nail on the head with that comment,it's all a farce.Quite clearly you dont follow the club very well if you haven't heard about the Russian!!!

i follow the club, you obviously follow the Burnley Express. Come on, tell us all about this Russian as you must be "in the know"!!
.
We sold our ground when we had no money and were in danger of going into administration. We pay over £300k per year rent, why not buy it back?

You're right bud. Since Kilby took over and Teasdale to an extent, this club has always been run within its means. The board invest as much as they can but some fans think that they should just pump money in constantly.
Some of them are wealthy chaps but they're not in a position where they can afford to miss a couple of million quid.
I hope that we're not serious about foreign owners. Look at that laughing stock down the road/ Pompey/hearts etc

Not in a position to miss a couple of million ? Van der Schaff paid over a million pound in wages for 1 appearance for the club,Leon Cort,1.5 million plus wages,and many more.All of a sudden though we cant afford to miss a couple of million all of a sudden ? Remember what Kilby said' It's not a massive amount to pay back,around 3.2 million!!!! So what's 2 million if that's not a massive amount ? Oh,and at the time he said we didn't need to win promotion to the prem to afford it either.

I was talking about personal wealth. Could you put £2m of your own money in and not expect it back?
They don't have to put their money in, do they? It wouldn't be much of a club without it, would it?

UTC

Just for the interest of any soap-dodging Grintwum chicken-gobbler that strays on here and assumes his club has manymanymanymanymany more 'supporters' than Burnley because of the numbers commenting on threads, you're wrong.

I have a Leeds-supporting friend who assumed his club were bigger than most others because they were always on the back page of the red tops he read. Until it was pointed out to him that was because he lives in Leeds and the red-top he was reading was a locally-printed one so bound to be Leeds biased. If he was to go further south and buy the same paper, the Leeds stories would be relegated to the inside pages and the Sheffield clubs would feature more and it would change depending upon the region you bought the paper.

It's the same with this paper. It is glaringly obvious there is a Blackburn bias and as such, it may as well change its name to the Blackburn Telegraph. Since most Burnley fans have got better places to post their views and opinions, they do so. But don't assume the numbers associated with each thread indicate an imbalance in actual supporters. Burnley, pro rata, are better supported than t'Ruhrvurs

TodClaret wrote:

midas wrote:

claret777 wrote:

midas wrote: How can Kilby decide, he isn't the Chairman? Who is this Russian billionaire you know? How much would you like the club to spend?

You have hit the nail on the head with that comment,it's all a farce.Quite clearly you dont follow the club very well if you haven't heard about the Russian!!!

i follow the club, you obviously follow the Burnley Express. Come on, tell us all about this Russian as you must be "in the know"!!
.
We sold our ground when we had no money and were in danger of going into administration. We pay over £300k per year rent, why not buy it back?

You're right bud. Since Kilby took over and Teasdale to an extent, this club has always been run within its means. The board invest as much as they can but some fans think that they should just pump money in constantly.
Some of them are wealthy chaps but they're not in a position where they can afford to miss a couple of million quid.
I hope that we're not serious about foreign owners. Look at that laughing stock down the road/ Pompey/hearts etc

Chelsea, Man City, Spurs, etc;etc;etc.

Depends how lucky you are.

Could you please take Venky's off us? :-)

Chris P Bacon wrote:
Just for the interest of any soap-dodging Grintwum chicken-gobbler that strays on here and assumes his club has manymanymanymanymany more 'supporters' than Burnley because of the numbers commenting on threads, you're wrong.

I have a Leeds-supporting friend who assumed his club were bigger than most others because they were always on the back page of the red tops he read. Until it was pointed out to him that was because he lives in Leeds and the red-top he was reading was a locally-printed one so bound to be Leeds biased. If he was to go further south and buy the same paper, the Leeds stories would be relegated to the inside pages and the Sheffield clubs would feature more and it would change depending upon the region you bought the paper.

It's the same with this paper. It is glaringly obvious there is a Blackburn bias and as such, it may as well change its name to the Blackburn Telegraph. Since most Burnley fans have got better places to post their views and opinions, they do so. But don't assume the numbers associated with each thread indicate an imbalance in actual supporters. Burnley, pro rata, are better supported than t'Ruhrvurs

My word you don't half have several chips on your shoulders don't you?

You should try aiming for one of your mouths at feeding time.

MightyClaret wrote:
UTC

Did you just clear your throat?

owd nick wrote:

Chris P Bacon wrote:
Just for the interest of any soap-dodging Grintwum chicken-gobbler that strays on here and assumes his club has manymanymanymanymany more 'supporters' than Burnley because of the numbers commenting on threads, you're wrong.

I have a Leeds-supporting friend who assumed his club were bigger than most others because they were always on the back page of the red tops he read. Until it was pointed out to him that was because he lives in Leeds and the red-top he was reading was a locally-printed one so bound to be Leeds biased. If he was to go further south and buy the same paper, the Leeds stories would be relegated to the inside pages and the Sheffield clubs would feature more and it would change depending upon the region you bought the paper.

It's the same with this paper. It is glaringly obvious there is a Blackburn bias and as such, it may as well change its name to the Blackburn Telegraph. Since most Burnley fans have got better places to post their views and opinions, they do so. But don't assume the numbers associated with each thread indicate an imbalance in actual supporters. Burnley, pro rata, are better supported than t'Ruhrvurs

My word you don't half have several chips on your shoulders don't you?

You should try aiming for one of your mouths at feeding time.

None whatsoever. Wait a minute, I haven't been conned into opening the door to the Jehovah's Witness of stupidity, have i? If so, I'll have to give my own tenner to myself. If not, another village is looking for you. Get back quick or they'll have to advertise they've got a vacancy for an idiot.

TodClaret wrote:

claret777 wrote:

TodClaret wrote:

midas wrote:

claret777 wrote:

midas wrote: How can Kilby decide, he isn't the Chairman? Who is this Russian billionaire you know? How much would you like the club to spend?

You have hit the nail on the head with that comment,it's all a farce.Quite clearly you dont follow the club very well if you haven't heard about the Russian!!!

i follow the club, you obviously follow the Burnley Express. Come on, tell us all about this Russian as you must be "in the know"!!
.
We sold our ground when we had no money and were in danger of going into administration. We pay over £300k per year rent, why not buy it back?

You're right bud. Since Kilby took over and Teasdale to an extent, this club has always been run within its means. The board invest as much as they can but some fans think that they should just pump money in constantly.
Some of them are wealthy chaps but they're not in a position where they can afford to miss a couple of million quid.
I hope that we're not serious about foreign owners. Look at that laughing stock down the road/ Pompey/hearts etc

Not in a position to miss a couple of million ? Van der Schaff paid over a million pound in wages for 1 appearance for the club,Leon Cort,1.5 million plus wages,and many more.All of a sudden though we cant afford to miss a couple of million all of a sudden ? Remember what Kilby said' It's not a massive amount to pay back,around 3.2 million!!!! So what's 2 million if that's not a massive amount ? Oh,and at the time he said we didn't need to win promotion to the prem to afford it either.

I was talking about personal wealth. Could you put £2m of your own money in and not expect it back?
They don't have to put their money in, do they? It wouldn't be much of a club without it, would it?

Yaawnnnn,like banging head against a brick wall.Ambition!!!!!!!
!!!!!

TodClaret wrote:

claret777 wrote:

TodClaret wrote:

midas wrote:

claret777 wrote:

midas wrote: How can Kilby decide, he isn't the Chairman? Who is this Russian billionaire you know? How much would you like the club to spend?

You have hit the nail on the head with that comment,it's all a farce.Quite clearly you dont follow the club very well if you haven't heard about the Russian!!!

i follow the club, you obviously follow the Burnley Express. Come on, tell us all about this Russian as you must be "in the know"!!
.
We sold our ground when we had no money and were in danger of going into administration. We pay over £300k per year rent, why not buy it back?

You're right bud. Since Kilby took over and Teasdale to an extent, this club has always been run within its means. The board invest as much as they can but some fans think that they should just pump money in constantly.
Some of them are wealthy chaps but they're not in a position where they can afford to miss a couple of million quid.
I hope that we're not serious about foreign owners. Look at that laughing stock down the road/ Pompey/hearts etc

Not in a position to miss a couple of million ? Van der Schaff paid over a million pound in wages for 1 appearance for the club,Leon Cort,1.5 million plus wages,and many more.All of a sudden though we cant afford to miss a couple of million all of a sudden ? Remember what Kilby said' It's not a massive amount to pay back,around 3.2 million!!!! So what's 2 million if that's not a massive amount ? Oh,and at the time he said we didn't need to win promotion to the prem to afford it either.

I was talking about personal wealth. Could you put £2m of your own money in and not expect it back?
They don't have to put their money in, do they? It wouldn't be much of a club without it, would it?

Yaawnnnn,like banging head against a brick wall.Ambition!!!!!!!
!!!!!

claret777 wrote:

TodClaret wrote:

claret777 wrote:

TodClaret wrote:

midas wrote:

claret777 wrote:

midas wrote: How can Kilby decide, he isn't the Chairman? Who is this Russian billionaire you know? How much would you like the club to spend?

You have hit the nail on the head with that comment,it's all a farce.Quite clearly you dont follow the club very well if you haven't heard about the Russian!!!

i follow the club, you obviously follow the Burnley Express. Come on, tell us all about this Russian as you must be "in the know"!!
.
We sold our ground when we had no money and were in danger of going into administration. We pay over £300k per year rent, why not buy it back?

You're right bud. Since Kilby took over and Teasdale to an extent, this club has always been run within its means. The board invest as much as they can but some fans think that they should just pump money in constantly.
Some of them are wealthy chaps but they're not in a position where they can afford to miss a couple of million quid.
I hope that we're not serious about foreign owners. Look at that laughing stock down the road/ Pompey/hearts etc

Not in a position to miss a couple of million ? Van der Schaff paid over a million pound in wages for 1 appearance for the club,Leon Cort,1.5 million plus wages,and many more.All of a sudden though we cant afford to miss a couple of million all of a sudden ? Remember what Kilby said' It's not a massive amount to pay back,around 3.2 million!!!! So what's 2 million if that's not a massive amount ? Oh,and at the time he said we didn't need to win promotion to the prem to afford it either.

I was talking about personal wealth. Could you put £2m of your own money in and not expect it back?
They don't have to put their money in, do they? It wouldn't be much of a club without it, would it?

Yaawnnnn,like banging head against a brick wall.Ambition!!!!!!!

!!!!!

Some clowns on this page.Every time i post it's a back up situ,BORE OFF

Chris P Bacon wrote:

owd nick wrote:

Chris P Bacon wrote:
Just for the interest of any soap-dodging Grintwum chicken-gobbler that strays on here and assumes his club has manymanymanymanymany more 'supporters' than Burnley because of the numbers commenting on threads, you're wrong.

I have a Leeds-supporting friend who assumed his club were bigger than most others because they were always on the back page of the red tops he read. Until it was pointed out to him that was because he lives in Leeds and the red-top he was reading was a locally-printed one so bound to be Leeds biased. If he was to go further south and buy the same paper, the Leeds stories would be relegated to the inside pages and the Sheffield clubs would feature more and it would change depending upon the region you bought the paper.

It's the same with this paper. It is glaringly obvious there is a Blackburn bias and as such, it may as well change its name to the Blackburn Telegraph. Since most Burnley fans have got better places to post their views and opinions, they do so. But don't assume the numbers associated with each thread indicate an imbalance in actual supporters. Burnley, pro rata, are better supported than t'Ruhrvurs

My word you don't half have several chips on your shoulders don't you?

You should try aiming for one of your mouths at feeding time.

None whatsoever. Wait a minute, I haven't been conned into opening the door to the Jehovah's Witness of stupidity, have i? If so, I'll have to give my own tenner to myself. If not, another village is looking for you. Get back quick or they'll have to advertise they've got a vacancy for an idiot.

LOL