Lancashire TelegraphSingh's New Year managerial aim (From Lancashire Telegraph)

When news happens, text LT and your photos and videos to 80360. Or contact us by email or phone.

Singh's New Year managerial aim

SHEBBY Singh admits he would like to appoint a new manager at Blackburn Rovers tomorrow – after revealing he has already submitted his favoured candidates to owners Venky’s.

Rovers’ under fire global advisor, who received a torrent of abuse from the travelling fans during Saturday’s 3-1 win at Barnsley, is now waiting for the green light from his bosses to make a move after identifying candidates for the job.

Reserve team boss Gary Bowyer guided a spirited Rovers to just their second win in 11 matches at Oakwell but Singh is hopeful a permanent appointment can soon be made.

Singh held talks with former Aston Villa caretaker boss Kevin MacDonald last week about a potential head coach role at the club, but was still planning to bring in a manager.

The Malaysian bizarrely distanced the club from MacDonald in a radio interview on Saturday, claiming he wanted to be his friend, as well as denying considering offering coach Judan Ali a role in some capacity.

The Lancashire Telegraph understands that Singh’s determination to add coaches before a manager has cooled after receiving a fierce backlash from supporters on Friday morning.

It is believed he now regards ‘experience’ as an important factor as he waits for feedback on his suggestions to Venky’s. Singh said: “I have made my submissions to my bosses.

“They will receive it, then we will talk about it. We would like to make an appointment on New Year’s Day to start the New Year in the right way and to see the back of a horrible 2012.”

Bowyer will take charge of first team affairs for tomorrow’s visit of Nottingham Forest, with the appointment of a new manager far from certain by the end of tomorrow, despite Singh’s hopes.

Director of operations Paul Agnew and managing director Derek Shaw, who returned from meeting the owners in India yesterday, are understood to have different ideas about who to appoint next as boss.

Singh declined to comment on reports that Shaw and Agnew had travelled to India to voice their concern over his alleged interference, other than saying: “My lawyers have advised me not to comment on that.”

He did however talk about having to fight battles inside the club during a fans phone-in show on BBC Radio Five Live on Saturday night.

He said: “As with every organisation not everyone is fighting the same cause. Individuals have their own agenda, this is common wherever you go. I have been fighting the regular battles.”

He also told the show’s co-host, former Rovers player Robbie Savage, how the side needed coaching. He said: “We would like to be coached.

“I think coaching is very, very important. Then comes managing.

“It is not a ready made team, we are in transition, we are rebuilding, not only the football aspect but the emotional aspect of the players, the emotional health of the players after relegation.

“A lot of things have to be considered. I put up my hands and say if I got it wrong I got it wrong.

“Experience is something we are looking at, and I have had a conversation with a couple of very, very experienced managers.

“But there is no secret formula.” Singh has also asked the Lancashire Telegraph to thank the supporters as well as Gary Bowyer and his temporary management team for their efforts at Oakwell.

He said: “While I am disappointed about the reaction towards me, the fans were fantastic in their support of the players and Gary and his team. That is what matters.

“Gary is an unsung hero at the club, and he and his team were brilliant on Saturday. It was a tremendous effort from everyone."

Comments (132)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

10:12am Mon 31 Dec 12

8 Ball Deluxe says...

Shaggy out, yellow ball corner pocket.
Shaggy out, yellow ball corner pocket. 8 Ball Deluxe
  • Score: 0

10:26am Mon 31 Dec 12

Bangkok Rover says...

I'd rather have Shaw choose the manager than Singh. Bringing in coaches first then back-tracking after negative fans' reaction - what a shambles. Singh out. HNY to all!
I'd rather have Shaw choose the manager than Singh. Bringing in coaches first then back-tracking after negative fans' reaction - what a shambles. Singh out. HNY to all! Bangkok Rover
  • Score: 0

10:27am Mon 31 Dec 12

tiojo says...

Mr Singh's interview with Robbie Savage was a masterclass in evasion and contradictory footballing cliches. Everything you would expect from the erratic TV pundit that he is. The fact that he is in charge of the club is just an indication of the scale of the problem. Just as significant is the fact that Messrs Shaw and Agnew who are supposedly part of the senior management of the club have nothing to say. Rovers are going nowhere but downhill.
Mr Singh's interview with Robbie Savage was a masterclass in evasion and contradictory footballing cliches. Everything you would expect from the erratic TV pundit that he is. The fact that he is in charge of the club is just an indication of the scale of the problem. Just as significant is the fact that Messrs Shaw and Agnew who are supposedly part of the senior management of the club have nothing to say. Rovers are going nowhere but downhill. tiojo
  • Score: 0

10:28am Mon 31 Dec 12

drunken donut says...

As for Shabby on radio 5 live, it is better to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool than to open it and remove all doubt.
As for Shabby on radio 5 live, it is better to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool than to open it and remove all doubt. drunken donut
  • Score: 0

10:30am Mon 31 Dec 12

gembeli says...

What an absolute joker.I wouldn't trust him to make the tea.Hope your on the phone to him Andy and ask him which version of his explanations are we to believe.Better be quick though a new version will be out later today.
What an absolute joker.I wouldn't trust him to make the tea.Hope your on the phone to him Andy and ask him which version of his explanations are we to believe.Better be quick though a new version will be out later today. gembeli
  • Score: 0

10:34am Mon 31 Dec 12

ChrisDeBerg says...

Singh you turd, we dont care if you are unhappy about the way we vented our anger at you on Saturday... You deserve everything you get!

Shaw and Agnew are no Williams and Finn, but they know a hell of a lot more than you, your a failure in your football career and a Malaysian tv pundit at best. YET, you had to put your stamp on employing Berg rather than an experienced manager like Ian Holloway, why? Because you have no idea do you!?

When Berg was employed I actually thought, you know what, maybe not a bad appointment. 10 games later I still thought we had a good manager that had just seen a few performances go the wrong way. January would have been massive for Berg, changing some backroom staff would have been good for him too...

But here we are, 2 months later than where we was when 'say the opposite to what is going on' Singh said we was making the right decisions and we are back to where we was 2 months ago. The only issue now is we dont have the managers that were available back then and we will DEFINITELY not have a manager in quick enough to assess the current squad to make an informed decision on who to replace in the January window... Even if we do employ them tomorrow!!

You really are a 1st class turd and deserve to be sacked... WHY ARE YOU EVEN HERE? WE DO NOT NEED YOU AND YOU ADD NOTHING TO THE CLUB BUT CONFUSION! SHAW AND AGNEW DO NOT NEED YOU HERE SO GO HOME AND LEAVE BRFC ALONE!! WE WILL BE BETTER OFF WITHOUT YOU!

RTID
Singh you turd, we dont care if you are unhappy about the way we vented our anger at you on Saturday... You deserve everything you get! Shaw and Agnew are no Williams and Finn, but they know a hell of a lot more than you, your a failure in your football career and a Malaysian tv pundit at best. YET, you had to put your stamp on employing Berg rather than an experienced manager like Ian Holloway, why? Because you have no idea do you!? When Berg was employed I actually thought, you know what, maybe not a bad appointment. 10 games later I still thought we had a good manager that had just seen a few performances go the wrong way. January would have been massive for Berg, changing some backroom staff would have been good for him too... But here we are, 2 months later than where we was when 'say the opposite to what is going on' Singh said we was making the right decisions and we are back to where we was 2 months ago. The only issue now is we dont have the managers that were available back then and we will DEFINITELY not have a manager in quick enough to assess the current squad to make an informed decision on who to replace in the January window... Even if we do employ them tomorrow!! You really are a 1st class turd and deserve to be sacked... WHY ARE YOU EVEN HERE? WE DO NOT NEED YOU AND YOU ADD NOTHING TO THE CLUB BUT CONFUSION! SHAW AND AGNEW DO NOT NEED YOU HERE SO GO HOME AND LEAVE BRFC ALONE!! WE WILL BE BETTER OFF WITHOUT YOU! RTID ChrisDeBerg
  • Score: 0

10:37am Mon 31 Dec 12

sonny says...

More Anti-Shebby Singh propaganda from Paul Agnew & Derek Shaw doing the rounds this weekend in the tabloids, Agnew&Shaw are the really poison at BRFC any fan that does a little research(other than reading the tabloids) knows that. Singh's a nutter but his heart seems to be in the right place, Shebbys just very misguided because his so-called Colleagues have being playing him from day one(just like they have been playing the venkys from day 1 of there take-over).
More Anti-Shebby Singh propaganda from Paul Agnew & Derek Shaw doing the rounds this weekend in the tabloids, Agnew&Shaw are the really poison at BRFC any fan that does a little research(other than reading the tabloids) knows that. Singh's a nutter but his heart seems to be in the right place, Shebbys just very misguided because his so-called Colleagues have being playing him from day one(just like they have been playing the venkys from day 1 of there take-over). sonny
  • Score: 0

10:39am Mon 31 Dec 12

wanderingrover says...

drunken donut wrote:
As for Shabby on radio 5 live, it is better to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool than to open it and remove all doubt.
indeed
[quote][p][bold]drunken donut[/bold] wrote: As for Shabby on radio 5 live, it is better to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool than to open it and remove all doubt.[/p][/quote]indeed wanderingrover
  • Score: 0

10:41am Mon 31 Dec 12

Roverthere says...

The sooner Shaw and Agnew are out the better!
The sooner Shaw and Agnew are out the better! Roverthere
  • Score: 0

10:42am Mon 31 Dec 12

Roverthere says...

The sooner Shaw and Agnew are gone the better!
The sooner Shaw and Agnew are gone the better! Roverthere
  • Score: 0

10:44am Mon 31 Dec 12

sonny says...

Saddest thing is that the ignorant small minded section of rovers fans are lapping up the Agnew/Singh fabricated BS propaganda, How can anybody not see that Agnew his been behind every suspicous thing that has happened at this club since Venkys took over, he hates all the fans because we didnt get behind his partner in crime Kean and theres strong reasons to believe he is himself just a puppet for a certain Horrid agent we all know and love!
Saddest thing is that the ignorant small minded section of rovers fans are lapping up the Agnew/Singh fabricated BS propaganda, How can anybody not see that Agnew his been behind every suspicous thing that has happened at this club since Venkys took over, he hates all the fans because we didnt get behind his partner in crime Kean and theres strong reasons to believe he is himself just a puppet for a certain Horrid agent we all know and love! sonny
  • Score: 0

10:46am Mon 31 Dec 12

8 Ball Deluxe says...

Coaching, coaching is very important and so is managering, managering is important too. And what about running, running has to be involved at some point but not just running on the spot with a bit of kicking, kicking is always good but much better away from your goal box.
I also find passing, passing is sometimes overlooked in the game today. And also I think that tackling, tackling can work to some degree. But not from behind, no, no, no, no, no, Ryan giggs tackles like all good centre halves should do I enjoy watching him play there for England at Lords
An excert from the upcoming Football training bible from Junad Ali and Shebbys school of soccer
Coaching, coaching is very important and so is managering, managering is important too. And what about running, running has to be involved at some point but not just running on the spot with a bit of kicking, kicking is always good but much better away from your goal box. I also find passing, passing is sometimes overlooked in the game today. And also I think that tackling, tackling can work to some degree. But not from behind, no, no, no, no, no, Ryan giggs tackles like all good centre halves should do I enjoy watching him play there for England at Lords An excert from the upcoming Football training bible from Junad Ali and Shebbys school of soccer 8 Ball Deluxe
  • Score: 0

10:48am Mon 31 Dec 12

bobinspain says...

Vote with your wallets BRFC supporters.
Boycott home games and get the message through to Venky's and Singh.
I admire your stoicism in defence of your team on these threads, but the perpetrators of your club's downfall don't give a flying **** for your opinions.
Hit 'em where it hurts.
(and buena suerte).
Vote with your wallets BRFC supporters. Boycott home games and get the message through to Venky's and Singh. I admire your stoicism in defence of your team on these threads, but the perpetrators of your club's downfall don't give a flying **** for your opinions. Hit 'em where it hurts. (and buena suerte). bobinspain
  • Score: 0

10:48am Mon 31 Dec 12

wanderingrover says...

Shebby Singh brought in to improve communication between owners and supporters.

- Can't define his own job
- Can't answer a question without contradicting himself or sounding nonsensical
- Can't understand it's not a good idea to praise Tottenham's result when he's employed by Rovers
- No experience of English football or management yet seems to be running a club based on the fact he's Asia's equivalent of Mark Lawrenson

Chances of any decent football manager not purely coming for the money - 0%

More tragedy than comedy.
Shebby Singh brought in to improve communication between owners and supporters. - Can't define his own job - Can't answer a question without contradicting himself or sounding nonsensical - Can't understand it's not a good idea to praise Tottenham's result when he's employed by Rovers - No experience of English football or management yet seems to be running a club based on the fact he's Asia's equivalent of Mark Lawrenson Chances of any decent football manager not purely coming for the money - 0% More tragedy than comedy. wanderingrover
  • Score: 0

10:54am Mon 31 Dec 12

bburnrover says...

Yes we are all totally agreed Singh should resign as he is a negative influence on the clubs progress.We do not require a global adviser so spend his salary on a decent defender.
Yes we are all totally agreed Singh should resign as he is a negative influence on the clubs progress.We do not require a global adviser so spend his salary on a decent defender. bburnrover
  • Score: 0

11:04am Mon 31 Dec 12

Big Rover says...

What's a Global Advisor?
Shebby laughs and replied 'I'm not telling you.'

This clown is treating us all with contempt & is wrecking Rovers.
Our Gullible Aspirer!
What's a Global Advisor? Shebby laughs and replied 'I'm not telling you.' This clown is treating us all with contempt & is wrecking Rovers. Our Gullible Aspirer! Big Rover
  • Score: 0

11:09am Mon 31 Dec 12

greenscreener says...

8 Ball Deluxe wrote:
Coaching, coaching is very important and so is managering, managering is important too. And what about running, running has to be involved at some point but not just running on the spot with a bit of kicking, kicking is always good but much better away from your goal box.
I also find passing, passing is sometimes overlooked in the game today. And also I think that tackling, tackling can work to some degree. But not from behind, no, no, no, no, no, Ryan giggs tackles like all good centre halves should do I enjoy watching him play there for England at Lords
An excert from the upcoming Football training bible from Junad Ali and Shebbys school of soccer
Excellent break there 8-ball, enjoyed that one !
[quote][p][bold]8 Ball Deluxe[/bold] wrote: Coaching, coaching is very important and so is managering, managering is important too. And what about running, running has to be involved at some point but not just running on the spot with a bit of kicking, kicking is always good but much better away from your goal box. I also find passing, passing is sometimes overlooked in the game today. And also I think that tackling, tackling can work to some degree. But not from behind, no, no, no, no, no, Ryan giggs tackles like all good centre halves should do I enjoy watching him play there for England at Lords An excert from the upcoming Football training bible from Junad Ali and Shebbys school of soccer[/p][/quote]Excellent break there 8-ball, enjoyed that one ! greenscreener
  • Score: 0

11:09am Mon 31 Dec 12

mammamiauk says...

Shabby Shebby, get out of our club, you have already been described as a 'buffoon' by people on Sky TV after your interview on Radio 5 Live.

I used to live in Malaysia for a while and remember you as someone who just talked too much but knows nothing about football! When I heard you were coming to join Rovers, I thought you would make us a laughing stock and you certainly have!!

And yes, I agree with the comments by ChrisDeBerg above that whilst Shaw and Agnew are no Williams and Finn, they know SO MUCH MORE than you, Shabby.

On the subject of our new Manager, The Mirror has reported today that Alan Curbishley, Phil Brown, Billy Davies and Iain Dowie are in the frame.

What is happening to our beloved Rovers?!
Shabby Shebby, get out of our club, you have already been described as a 'buffoon' by people on Sky TV after your interview on Radio 5 Live. I used to live in Malaysia for a while and remember you as someone who just talked too much but knows nothing about football! When I heard you were coming to join Rovers, I thought you would make us a laughing stock and you certainly have!! And yes, I agree with the comments by ChrisDeBerg above that whilst Shaw and Agnew are no Williams and Finn, they know SO MUCH MORE than you, Shabby. On the subject of our new Manager, The Mirror has reported today that Alan Curbishley, Phil Brown, Billy Davies and Iain Dowie are in the frame. What is happening to our beloved Rovers?! mammamiauk
  • Score: 0

11:11am Mon 31 Dec 12

Captain Dreckley says...

The only thing I think we can all agree with Shebby on is that 2012 was a terrible year and we will all be glad to see the back of it. As for a manager tomorrow, let's believe it when we see it. Obviously Singh does not like the supporter hostility towards him and this is reflected in the increasing number of 180 degree turns he is making. For the club to move on, the infighting has to stop. Talk of enemies within really shows what a mess the executive infrastructure is in with reports of Shaw and Agnew in India trying to get rid of Singh. What is obvious is that venkys back Singh and despatch Shaw and Agnew or they get rid of Singh. The current triangle of struggle cannot remain, although Venkys do have a third option, get rid of all three and bring in a new executive team with extensive experience of the English game (like we used to have).
All the very best for the new year to the team and Rovers supporters everywhere and let's start 2013 like we ended 2012 with 3 points.
The only thing I think we can all agree with Shebby on is that 2012 was a terrible year and we will all be glad to see the back of it. As for a manager tomorrow, let's believe it when we see it. Obviously Singh does not like the supporter hostility towards him and this is reflected in the increasing number of 180 degree turns he is making. For the club to move on, the infighting has to stop. Talk of enemies within really shows what a mess the executive infrastructure is in with reports of Shaw and Agnew in India trying to get rid of Singh. What is obvious is that venkys back Singh and despatch Shaw and Agnew or they get rid of Singh. The current triangle of struggle cannot remain, although Venkys do have a third option, get rid of all three and bring in a new executive team with extensive experience of the English game (like we used to have). All the very best for the new year to the team and Rovers supporters everywhere and let's start 2013 like we ended 2012 with 3 points. Captain Dreckley
  • Score: 0

11:13am Mon 31 Dec 12

Venkytrash says...

The global adviser was on the pitch after the dingles game being applauded!!!! He was without doubt a half wit then!!!! Why did people cheer this Malaysian tea boy then? I for one couldn't understand it?
The global adviser was on the pitch after the dingles game being applauded!!!! He was without doubt a half wit then!!!! Why did people cheer this Malaysian tea boy then? I for one couldn't understand it? Venkytrash
  • Score: 0

11:13am Mon 31 Dec 12

mike55 says...

I would really welcome a statement on the true situation at the club from Robert Coar,a Rovers director and sole survivor of the Venky's takeover.
Can you arrange that Andy?
That should be your New Year's resolution.
However, I am not holding my breath.
I would really welcome a statement on the true situation at the club from Robert Coar,a Rovers director and sole survivor of the Venky's takeover. Can you arrange that Andy? That should be your New Year's resolution. However, I am not holding my breath. mike55
  • Score: 0

11:16am Mon 31 Dec 12

Ripley 7 says...

Shebby's interview on 606 with Robbie Savage was truly scary. This guy running our club couldn't give a straight, honest answer to anything. Robbie didn't know whether to laugh or cry – he clearly still cares about Rovers. I boycotted, no season ticket renewal after following Rovers for decades, then when Kean went, I returned. When Berg was appointed I bought a half-season ticket and looked forward to giving the team my support from the Blackburn End. Now it looks like we're in for a repeat of last season – bad atmosphere and no direction. At least we get to go to the circus every fortnight!
Shebby's interview on 606 with Robbie Savage was truly scary. This guy running our club couldn't give a straight, honest answer to anything. Robbie didn't know whether to laugh or cry – he clearly still cares about Rovers. I boycotted, no season ticket renewal after following Rovers for decades, then when Kean went, I returned. When Berg was appointed I bought a half-season ticket and looked forward to giving the team my support from the Blackburn End. Now it looks like we're in for a repeat of last season – bad atmosphere and no direction. At least we get to go to the circus every fortnight! Ripley 7
  • Score: 0

11:16am Mon 31 Dec 12

McRover says...

There's no doubt that Singh is a complete buffon, I'd agree with you there. I do believe, however, that Agnew and Shaw are the real villans here and am in no doubt that all the stories leaked to press come from them. They were both brought in by Kean and they're allegiance is to a certain management company run by a certain agent. They ALL need to be removed and replaced with decent football people who don't have their own agenda. Unfortunately I don't believe Venkys have the sense to do this.Worrying times ahead.
There's no doubt that Singh is a complete buffon, I'd agree with you there. I do believe, however, that Agnew and Shaw are the real villans here and am in no doubt that all the stories leaked to press come from them. They were both brought in by Kean and they're allegiance is to a certain management company run by a certain agent. They ALL need to be removed and replaced with decent football people who don't have their own agenda. Unfortunately I don't believe Venkys have the sense to do this.Worrying times ahead. McRover
  • Score: 0

11:23am Mon 31 Dec 12

To.guy says...

The problem with rovers fans is that venkys have nurtured such suspicion in us we are now compelled to identify the suspect. We have to realize that there isn't just one. We have a complicated crime ring and with venkys as the clueless ringleader there is a play off going on between the others - Agnew,shaw, Singh possibly with influence from JA. Singh is the bumbling stool pigeon. Agnew(don't forget means ally ) and shaw are playing him like a fiddle. Agnew is not to be trusted. If they get Singh out, we are in deeper trouble believe me.
The problem with rovers fans is that venkys have nurtured such suspicion in us we are now compelled to identify the suspect. We have to realize that there isn't just one. We have a complicated crime ring and with venkys as the clueless ringleader there is a play off going on between the others - Agnew,shaw, Singh possibly with influence from JA. Singh is the bumbling stool pigeon. Agnew(don't forget means ally ) and shaw are playing him like a fiddle. Agnew is not to be trusted. If they get Singh out, we are in deeper trouble believe me. To.guy
  • Score: 0

11:25am Mon 31 Dec 12

moh says...

sonny wrote:
More Anti-Shebby Singh propaganda from Paul Agnew & Derek Shaw doing the rounds this weekend in the tabloids, Agnew&Shaw are the really poison at BRFC any fan that does a little research(other than reading the tabloids) knows that. Singh's a nutter but his heart seems to be in the right place, Shebbys just very misguided because his so-called Colleagues have being playing him from day one(just like they have been playing the venkys from day 1 of there take-over).
Singh is stupid, instead of putting Agnew as general manager and responsible for communication in limelight he is taking all the flak. Get Agnew to make statements so every word, sentence he says is analysed over and over again and then speculation, innuendos, rumours can spiral as is the case at present. Just take a back seat Singh. He gets paid to do that. Also find the mole within the club who have been allegedly leaking information including team sheets well before passed to opposition teams. There re people undermining the club and need to be weeded out..
[quote][p][bold]sonny[/bold] wrote: More Anti-Shebby Singh propaganda from Paul Agnew & Derek Shaw doing the rounds this weekend in the tabloids, Agnew&Shaw are the really poison at BRFC any fan that does a little research(other than reading the tabloids) knows that. Singh's a nutter but his heart seems to be in the right place, Shebbys just very misguided because his so-called Colleagues have being playing him from day one(just like they have been playing the venkys from day 1 of there take-over).[/p][/quote]Singh is stupid, instead of putting Agnew as general manager and responsible for communication in limelight he is taking all the flak. Get Agnew to make statements so every word, sentence he says is analysed over and over again and then speculation, innuendos, rumours can spiral as is the case at present. Just take a back seat Singh. He gets paid to do that. Also find the mole within the club who have been allegedly leaking information including team sheets well before passed to opposition teams. There re people undermining the club and need to be weeded out.. moh
  • Score: 0

11:26am Mon 31 Dec 12

To.guy says...

To.guy wrote:
The problem with rovers fans is that venkys have nurtured such suspicion in us we are now compelled to identify the suspect. We have to realize that there isn't just one. We have a complicated crime ring and with venkys as the clueless ringleader there is a play off going on between the others - Agnew,shaw, Singh possibly with influence from JA. Singh is the bumbling stool pigeon. Agnew(don't forget means ally ) and shaw are playing him like a fiddle. Agnew is not to be trusted. If they get Singh out, we are in deeper trouble believe me.
Meant to say keans ally
[quote][p][bold]To.guy[/bold] wrote: The problem with rovers fans is that venkys have nurtured such suspicion in us we are now compelled to identify the suspect. We have to realize that there isn't just one. We have a complicated crime ring and with venkys as the clueless ringleader there is a play off going on between the others - Agnew,shaw, Singh possibly with influence from JA. Singh is the bumbling stool pigeon. Agnew(don't forget means ally ) and shaw are playing him like a fiddle. Agnew is not to be trusted. If they get Singh out, we are in deeper trouble believe me.[/p][/quote]Meant to say keans ally To.guy
  • Score: 0

11:29am Mon 31 Dec 12

Rover Pete says...

Has anybody a clue as to what Venky's are trying to do with Rovers?
They have not done one single thing right. How on earth did this shower end up so called millionaires? It must be very easy to make money in India. The farce still goes on. Singh is obviously crazy and totally out of his depth but Venky's still trust him and think he can walk on water.
We are going down to League 1 - no question. But why, oh why, are Venky's so happy to see it happen? There is nothing in it for them, is there?
Now it looks as though Givet, Pederson, Dunn and Robinson are going to be sold in January. Another bad move and a downwards step. Do Venky's know or care how stupid they have made themselves and the few supporters (myself included!) that are still left going to matches?
Has anybody a clue as to what Venky's are trying to do with Rovers? They have not done one single thing right. How on earth did this shower end up so called millionaires? It must be very easy to make money in India. The farce still goes on. Singh is obviously crazy and totally out of his depth but Venky's still trust him and think he can walk on water. We are going down to League 1 - no question. But why, oh why, are Venky's so happy to see it happen? There is nothing in it for them, is there? Now it looks as though Givet, Pederson, Dunn and Robinson are going to be sold in January. Another bad move and a downwards step. Do Venky's know or care how stupid they have made themselves and the few supporters (myself included!) that are still left going to matches? Rover Pete
  • Score: 0

11:38am Mon 31 Dec 12

roversammo says...

Who are the experienced managers out there? Of course there is Hughes but I don't think him or his staff would want to touch us. Plus he's never managed in the championship. Surely they will be looking at decent championship bosses like Grayson, Jones or even Davies. Not big names but people who know the league and can steady the ship. I actually thought Keith hill was a decent prospect, honest and truthfull, but results have gone against him lately and we need a manager with a winning mentality ie not sparky or hill. Thoughts of being a top side again are pointless, a top eight championship side is the best we can hope for with these retches in charge......... Oh, happy friggin new year I'm off getting drunk and arguing with dingles. RTID
Who are the experienced managers out there? Of course there is Hughes but I don't think him or his staff would want to touch us. Plus he's never managed in the championship. Surely they will be looking at decent championship bosses like Grayson, Jones or even Davies. Not big names but people who know the league and can steady the ship. I actually thought Keith hill was a decent prospect, honest and truthfull, but results have gone against him lately and we need a manager with a winning mentality ie not sparky or hill. Thoughts of being a top side again are pointless, a top eight championship side is the best we can hope for with these retches in charge......... Oh, happy friggin new year I'm off getting drunk and arguing with dingles. RTID roversammo
  • Score: 0

11:43am Mon 31 Dec 12

1952 rover says...

Will someone put us out of our misery and SACK this buffoon. He is making us a laughing stock. Go now please.
Will someone put us out of our misery and SACK this buffoon. He is making us a laughing stock. Go now please. 1952 rover
  • Score: 0

11:47am Mon 31 Dec 12

mike55 says...

The continuing pantomime at Rovers is like watching the tv series Homeland - I have no idea who are the good guys and who are the bad guys. Indeed do we have any good guys at the club? SS seems to be playing 'Championship Manager',becoming more dictatorial by the day and developing a cult of personality which will eventually see him purge the enemies within (Shaw and Agnew) sooner rather than later. Meanwhile Shaw and Agnew go and grass to Mummy in India that SS is not playing fair and trying to oust them or at least go behind their backs.And the question beckons,who is putting out all these press leaks every day about all the shenanigans going on at Ewood?

Meanwhile we have disaffected players on high wages who will want to leave in January though I cannot imagine there will be too many takers.

At this moment in time I would rather Rovers did a Rangers- be demoted to whatever League and start again under different ownership but with Rovers true interests at heart ( and I say that supporting Rovers for over 60 years).

Why can't we have a decent owner and chairman like Dave Whelan,an ex Rover?
The continuing pantomime at Rovers is like watching the tv series Homeland - I have no idea who are the good guys and who are the bad guys. Indeed do we have any good guys at the club? SS seems to be playing 'Championship Manager',becoming more dictatorial by the day and developing a cult of personality which will eventually see him purge the enemies within (Shaw and Agnew) sooner rather than later. Meanwhile Shaw and Agnew go and grass to Mummy in India that SS is not playing fair and trying to oust them or at least go behind their backs.And the question beckons,who is putting out all these press leaks every day about all the shenanigans going on at Ewood? Meanwhile we have disaffected players on high wages who will want to leave in January though I cannot imagine there will be too many takers. At this moment in time I would rather Rovers did a Rangers- be demoted to whatever League and start again under different ownership but with Rovers true interests at heart ( and I say that supporting Rovers for over 60 years). Why can't we have a decent owner and chairman like Dave Whelan,an ex Rover? mike55
  • Score: 0

11:49am Mon 31 Dec 12

unclejacklegend says...

Venkytrash wrote:
The global adviser was on the pitch after the dingles game being applauded!!!! He was without doubt a half wit then!!!! Why did people cheer this Malaysian tea boy then? I for one couldn't understand it?
I was still applauding the manager and players as they left the pitch when shabby scuttled over and muscled in on the applause. What a grade A b3ll3nd he really is!
[quote][p][bold]Venkytrash[/bold] wrote: The global adviser was on the pitch after the dingles game being applauded!!!! He was without doubt a half wit then!!!! Why did people cheer this Malaysian tea boy then? I for one couldn't understand it?[/p][/quote]I was still applauding the manager and players as they left the pitch when shabby scuttled over and muscled in on the applause. What a grade A b3ll3nd he really is! unclejacklegend
  • Score: 0

11:52am Mon 31 Dec 12

Is Eckersley playing? says...

How can Singh give the Indians a list of his preferred candidates for Madam
to make a decision and what will her decision be based on? Blind leading the blind. Surely the FA or the football league should be calling for an explanation
from the clowns. And what about Taylor of the Players Union. Not a word. Is he looking after his members interests, nit to mention him being a so-called pseudo Rovers fan. Does no-one out there care?
How can Singh give the Indians a list of his preferred candidates for Madam to make a decision and what will her decision be based on? Blind leading the blind. Surely the FA or the football league should be calling for an explanation from the clowns. And what about Taylor of the Players Union. Not a word. Is he looking after his members interests, nit to mention him being a so-called pseudo Rovers fan. Does no-one out there care? Is Eckersley playing?
  • Score: 0

11:52am Mon 31 Dec 12

gembeli says...

What an absolute joker.I wouldn't trust him to make the tea.Hope your on the phone to him Andy and ask him which version of his explanations are we to believe.Better be quick though a new version will be out later today.
What an absolute joker.I wouldn't trust him to make the tea.Hope your on the phone to him Andy and ask him which version of his explanations are we to believe.Better be quick though a new version will be out later today. gembeli
  • Score: 0

11:54am Mon 31 Dec 12

holmesy69 says...

Shebby is the one we need to get out of the as he thinks he can pick the team and who rovers buy **** off shebby
Shebby is the one we need to get out of the as he thinks he can pick the team and who rovers buy **** off shebby holmesy69
  • Score: 0

11:55am Mon 31 Dec 12

MerlinTheVoiceofReason2 says...

McRover wrote:
There's no doubt that Singh is a complete buffon, I'd agree with you there. I do believe, however, that Agnew and Shaw are the real villans here and am in no doubt that all the stories leaked to press come from them. They were both brought in by Kean and they're allegiance is to a certain management company run by a certain agent. They ALL need to be removed and replaced with decent football people who don't have their own agenda. Unfortunately I don't believe Venkys have the sense to do this.Worrying times ahead.
Shebby's 5 Live interview was a masterclass in obfuscation. However, if you read between the lines you can just about decipher what he's (wrongly in my view) trying to do.
He prattled on about watching BRFC for many years and us not having a "footballing philosophy" - that's key to his whole approach and the basis for him interfering at every level at the club. What he wants is (1) to decide and impose his own footballing philosophy and style; (2) put in place a coaching regime that will deliver that philosophy - hence his moves to put in coaches first before a manager, who not only teach footballing skills but do the fitness, diet and psychology stuff; and then (3) a manager is put in place to motivate the team on match days. In Shebby's model, the manager is almost superfluous - and therefore doesn't need to be expensive, doesn't need to be influential and doesn't need to be a big name. In fact, he's just a figurehead and someone who speaks with the media. In order to maintain this "philosophy", Shebby WILL get involved in transfers and team selection. It is clear that SS thinks Portugese players in particular fit in well with his "philosophy" and they are cheap to boot. Unfortunately, this model is not really in use in England. Managers DO have a much bigger role - they do get involved in transfers (of course sanctioned by the chequebook holders), they do select the team and they do decide on footballing tactics and style of play. What SS and Venkys are trying to do - and it won't work - is flip the English model on its' head. Hence the total mess at Ewood. Hence the internal divisions - Agnew, Shaw et al wanting to do things in the traditional way, SS trying to take complete control of the club to impose his vision and having to talk nonsense all the time to the media to explain these bizarre comedic chain of events. Let Shaw take control and bring back some sanity.
[quote][p][bold]McRover[/bold] wrote: There's no doubt that Singh is a complete buffon, I'd agree with you there. I do believe, however, that Agnew and Shaw are the real villans here and am in no doubt that all the stories leaked to press come from them. They were both brought in by Kean and they're allegiance is to a certain management company run by a certain agent. They ALL need to be removed and replaced with decent football people who don't have their own agenda. Unfortunately I don't believe Venkys have the sense to do this.Worrying times ahead.[/p][/quote]Shebby's 5 Live interview was a masterclass in obfuscation. However, if you read between the lines you can just about decipher what he's (wrongly in my view) trying to do. He prattled on about watching BRFC for many years and us not having a "footballing philosophy" - that's key to his whole approach and the basis for him interfering at every level at the club. What he wants is (1) to decide and impose his own footballing philosophy and style; (2) put in place a coaching regime that will deliver that philosophy - hence his moves to put in coaches first before a manager, who not only teach footballing skills but do the fitness, diet and psychology stuff; and then (3) a manager is put in place to motivate the team on match days. In Shebby's model, the manager is almost superfluous - and therefore doesn't need to be expensive, doesn't need to be influential and doesn't need to be a big name. In fact, he's just a figurehead and someone who speaks with the media. In order to maintain this "philosophy", Shebby WILL get involved in transfers and team selection. It is clear that SS thinks Portugese players in particular fit in well with his "philosophy" and they are cheap to boot. Unfortunately, this model is not really in use in England. Managers DO have a much bigger role - they do get involved in transfers (of course sanctioned by the chequebook holders), they do select the team and they do decide on footballing tactics and style of play. What SS and Venkys are trying to do - and it won't work - is flip the English model on its' head. Hence the total mess at Ewood. Hence the internal divisions - Agnew, Shaw et al wanting to do things in the traditional way, SS trying to take complete control of the club to impose his vision and having to talk nonsense all the time to the media to explain these bizarre comedic chain of events. Let Shaw take control and bring back some sanity. MerlinTheVoiceofReason2
  • Score: 0

11:55am Mon 31 Dec 12

holmesy69 says...

holmesy69 wrote:
Shebby is the one we need to get out of the as he thinks he can pick the team and who rovers buy **** off shebby
club
[quote][p][bold]holmesy69[/bold] wrote: Shebby is the one we need to get out of the as he thinks he can pick the team and who rovers buy **** off shebby[/p][/quote]club holmesy69
  • Score: 0

11:55am Mon 31 Dec 12

holmesy69 says...

holmesy69 wrote:
Shebby is the one we need to get out of the as he thinks he can pick the team and who rovers buy **** off shebby
club
[quote][p][bold]holmesy69[/bold] wrote: Shebby is the one we need to get out of the as he thinks he can pick the team and who rovers buy **** off shebby[/p][/quote]club holmesy69
  • Score: 0

11:55am Mon 31 Dec 12

holmesy69 says...

holmesy69 wrote:
Shebby is the one we need to get out of the as he thinks he can pick the team and who rovers buy **** off shebby
club
[quote][p][bold]holmesy69[/bold] wrote: Shebby is the one we need to get out of the as he thinks he can pick the team and who rovers buy **** off shebby[/p][/quote]club holmesy69
  • Score: 0

11:55am Mon 31 Dec 12

holmesy69 says...

holmesy69 wrote:
Shebby is the one we need to get out of the as he thinks he can pick the team and who rovers buy **** off shebby
club
[quote][p][bold]holmesy69[/bold] wrote: Shebby is the one we need to get out of the as he thinks he can pick the team and who rovers buy **** off shebby[/p][/quote]club holmesy69
  • Score: 0

11:55am Mon 31 Dec 12

holmesy69 says...

holmesy69 wrote:
Shebby is the one we need to get out of the as he thinks he can pick the team and who rovers buy **** off shebby
club
[quote][p][bold]holmesy69[/bold] wrote: Shebby is the one we need to get out of the as he thinks he can pick the team and who rovers buy **** off shebby[/p][/quote]club holmesy69
  • Score: 0

11:55am Mon 31 Dec 12

holmesy69 says...

holmesy69 wrote:
Shebby is the one we need to get out of the as he thinks he can pick the team and who rovers buy **** off shebby
club
[quote][p][bold]holmesy69[/bold] wrote: Shebby is the one we need to get out of the as he thinks he can pick the team and who rovers buy **** off shebby[/p][/quote]club holmesy69
  • Score: 0

11:55am Mon 31 Dec 12

holmesy69 says...

holmesy69 wrote:
Shebby is the one we need to get out of the as he thinks he can pick the team and who rovers buy **** off shebby
club
[quote][p][bold]holmesy69[/bold] wrote: Shebby is the one we need to get out of the as he thinks he can pick the team and who rovers buy **** off shebby[/p][/quote]club holmesy69
  • Score: 0

11:55am Mon 31 Dec 12

holmesy69 says...

holmesy69 wrote:
Shebby is the one we need to get out of the as he thinks he can pick the team and who rovers buy **** off shebby
club
[quote][p][bold]holmesy69[/bold] wrote: Shebby is the one we need to get out of the as he thinks he can pick the team and who rovers buy **** off shebby[/p][/quote]club holmesy69
  • Score: 0

11:55am Mon 31 Dec 12

holmesy69 says...

holmesy69 wrote:
Shebby is the one we need to get out of the as he thinks he can pick the team and who rovers buy **** off shebby
club
[quote][p][bold]holmesy69[/bold] wrote: Shebby is the one we need to get out of the as he thinks he can pick the team and who rovers buy **** off shebby[/p][/quote]club holmesy69
  • Score: 0

11:56am Mon 31 Dec 12

Langho blue says...

Why Agnew and Shaw remain at the club is beyond me. Surely if the owners back Shebby then these two need removing ASAP!

Pretty certain Shebby's heart is in the right place, even if he has some daft ideas and puts his foot in it often!

AGNEW should be the focus of the fans ire. Where can all the leaks to the press be coming from? Surely not our over promoted pr guy - The guy who targeted the fans whilst Kean was here.
Why Agnew and Shaw remain at the club is beyond me. Surely if the owners back Shebby then these two need removing ASAP! Pretty certain Shebby's heart is in the right place, even if he has some daft ideas and puts his foot in it often! AGNEW should be the focus of the fans ire. Where can all the leaks to the press be coming from? Surely not our over promoted pr guy - The guy who targeted the fans whilst Kean was here. Langho blue
  • Score: 0

11:57am Mon 31 Dec 12

eddyo says...

Rover Pete wrote:
Has anybody a clue as to what Venky's are trying to do with Rovers?
They have not done one single thing right. How on earth did this shower end up so called millionaires? It must be very easy to make money in India. The farce still goes on. Singh is obviously crazy and totally out of his depth but Venky's still trust him and think he can walk on water.
We are going down to League 1 - no question. But why, oh why, are Venky's so happy to see it happen? There is nothing in it for them, is there?
Now it looks as though Givet, Pederson, Dunn and Robinson are going to be sold in January. Another bad move and a downwards step. Do Venky's know or care how stupid they have made themselves and the few supporters (myself included!) that are still left going to matches?
Daddy started the Venkys business and like all spoiled, rich kids they will blow it all - a bit like Jack's brood.
[quote][p][bold]Rover Pete[/bold] wrote: Has anybody a clue as to what Venky's are trying to do with Rovers? They have not done one single thing right. How on earth did this shower end up so called millionaires? It must be very easy to make money in India. The farce still goes on. Singh is obviously crazy and totally out of his depth but Venky's still trust him and think he can walk on water. We are going down to League 1 - no question. But why, oh why, are Venky's so happy to see it happen? There is nothing in it for them, is there? Now it looks as though Givet, Pederson, Dunn and Robinson are going to be sold in January. Another bad move and a downwards step. Do Venky's know or care how stupid they have made themselves and the few supporters (myself included!) that are still left going to matches?[/p][/quote]Daddy started the Venkys business and like all spoiled, rich kids they will blow it all - a bit like Jack's brood. eddyo
  • Score: 0

11:59am Mon 31 Dec 12

ChrisDeBerg says...

Couldnt make a direct anagram work with shebbys title of 'Shebby Singh, Global Advisor'... Here are some words made from the letters in it though:

His Royal Badness
Load bearing boss
Early diagnosis
Behaving Badly
Biobehavioral
Diagnosis, oral bs


RTID
Couldnt make a direct anagram work with shebbys title of 'Shebby Singh, Global Advisor'... Here are some words made from the letters in it though: His Royal Badness Load bearing boss Early diagnosis Behaving Badly Biobehavioral Diagnosis, oral bs RTID ChrisDeBerg
  • Score: 0

12:02pm Mon 31 Dec 12

Darwener living in Canada says...

Rover Pete wrote:
Has anybody a clue as to what Venky's are trying to do with Rovers?
They have not done one single thing right. How on earth did this shower end up so called millionaires? It must be very easy to make money in India. The farce still goes on. Singh is obviously crazy and totally out of his depth but Venky's still trust him and think he can walk on water.
We are going down to League 1 - no question. But why, oh why, are Venky's so happy to see it happen? There is nothing in it for them, is there?
Now it looks as though Givet, Pederson, Dunn and Robinson are going to be sold in January. Another bad move and a downwards step. Do Venky's know or care how stupid they have made themselves and the few supporters (myself included!) that are still left going to matches?
Rovers will not be relegated to League 1 as you stated, even I know there are more than 3 teams more dire than us at the moment. As for the players you mentioned leaving in January so what? They are too slow/old and not fit enough for this league and I would add a few more players to your list. They have been good servants but needs must and teams need fast paced players in this league with zero time on the ball.
[quote][p][bold]Rover Pete[/bold] wrote: Has anybody a clue as to what Venky's are trying to do with Rovers? They have not done one single thing right. How on earth did this shower end up so called millionaires? It must be very easy to make money in India. The farce still goes on. Singh is obviously crazy and totally out of his depth but Venky's still trust him and think he can walk on water. We are going down to League 1 - no question. But why, oh why, are Venky's so happy to see it happen? There is nothing in it for them, is there? Now it looks as though Givet, Pederson, Dunn and Robinson are going to be sold in January. Another bad move and a downwards step. Do Venky's know or care how stupid they have made themselves and the few supporters (myself included!) that are still left going to matches?[/p][/quote]Rovers will not be relegated to League 1 as you stated, even I know there are more than 3 teams more dire than us at the moment. As for the players you mentioned leaving in January so what? They are too slow/old and not fit enough for this league and I would add a few more players to your list. They have been good servants but needs must and teams need fast paced players in this league with zero time on the ball. Darwener living in Canada
  • Score: 0

12:03pm Mon 31 Dec 12

madrover says...

why do venky's need a global advisor. Shaw and agnew should be communicating with fans and B.R.A.G. Agnew's and Singh's power struggles are damaging the club ,they both need to get off there high horses and work as a team . Personally i think singh should go so Agnew and Shaw can run our club without being undermined by a clueless t.v pundit who talks crap
why do venky's need a global advisor. Shaw and agnew should be communicating with fans and B.R.A.G. Agnew's and Singh's power struggles are damaging the club ,they both need to get off there high horses and work as a team . Personally i think singh should go so Agnew and Shaw can run our club without being undermined by a clueless t.v pundit who talks crap madrover
  • Score: 0

12:04pm Mon 31 Dec 12

buckoff says...

this just about sums up shaggy ding / venkys
/http://www.dailymai
l.co.uk/sport/footba
ll/article-2253666/H
enning-Berg-sacked-B
lackburn-Rovers-owne
rs-USELESS.html
this just about sums up shaggy ding / venkys /http://www.dailymai l.co.uk/sport/footba ll/article-2253666/H enning-Berg-sacked-B lackburn-Rovers-owne rs-USELESS.html buckoff
  • Score: 0

12:06pm Mon 31 Dec 12

8 Ball Deluxe says...

holmesy69 wrote:
holmesy69 wrote:
Shebby is the one we need to get out of the as he thinks he can pick the team and who rovers buy **** off shebby
club
The as club?
[quote][p][bold]holmesy69[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]holmesy69[/bold] wrote: Shebby is the one we need to get out of the as he thinks he can pick the team and who rovers buy **** off shebby[/p][/quote]club[/p][/quote]The as club? 8 Ball Deluxe
  • Score: 0

12:07pm Mon 31 Dec 12

8 Ball Deluxe says...

holmesy69 wrote:
holmesy69 wrote:
Shebby is the one we need to get out of the as he thinks he can pick the team and who rovers buy **** off shebby
club
You playing golf today?
[quote][p][bold]holmesy69[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]holmesy69[/bold] wrote: Shebby is the one we need to get out of the as he thinks he can pick the team and who rovers buy **** off shebby[/p][/quote]club[/p][/quote]You playing golf today? 8 Ball Deluxe
  • Score: 0

12:07pm Mon 31 Dec 12

Captain Dreckley says...

Rover Pete wrote:
Has anybody a clue as to what Venky's are trying to do with Rovers?
They have not done one single thing right. How on earth did this shower end up so called millionaires? It must be very easy to make money in India. The farce still goes on. Singh is obviously crazy and totally out of his depth but Venky's still trust him and think he can walk on water.
We are going down to League 1 - no question. But why, oh why, are Venky's so happy to see it happen? There is nothing in it for them, is there?
Now it looks as though Givet, Pederson, Dunn and Robinson are going to be sold in January. Another bad move and a downwards step. Do Venky's know or care how stupid they have made themselves and the few supporters (myself included!) that are still left going to matches?
Venkys didn't buy Rovers for the love of the game or club, they bought it to introduce the Venkys brand to a Europe hence the desire to play in the champions league. They anticipated the degree of publicity associated with champions league clubs and that publicity carrying association with the Venkys brand. Get the brand known in Europe and the UK then introduce the chicken shops. Venkys have certainly got the publicity but not how they expected. I think a certain Colonel can sleep soundly at night not fearing competition from this lot. What has transpired is that Venkys have done a Ratner ( anyone remember Gerald Ratner???)
[quote][p][bold]Rover Pete[/bold] wrote: Has anybody a clue as to what Venky's are trying to do with Rovers? They have not done one single thing right. How on earth did this shower end up so called millionaires? It must be very easy to make money in India. The farce still goes on. Singh is obviously crazy and totally out of his depth but Venky's still trust him and think he can walk on water. We are going down to League 1 - no question. But why, oh why, are Venky's so happy to see it happen? There is nothing in it for them, is there? Now it looks as though Givet, Pederson, Dunn and Robinson are going to be sold in January. Another bad move and a downwards step. Do Venky's know or care how stupid they have made themselves and the few supporters (myself included!) that are still left going to matches?[/p][/quote]Venkys didn't buy Rovers for the love of the game or club, they bought it to introduce the Venkys brand to a Europe hence the desire to play in the champions league. They anticipated the degree of publicity associated with champions league clubs and that publicity carrying association with the Venkys brand. Get the brand known in Europe and the UK then introduce the chicken shops. Venkys have certainly got the publicity but not how they expected. I think a certain Colonel can sleep soundly at night not fearing competition from this lot. What has transpired is that Venkys have done a Ratner ( anyone remember Gerald Ratner???) Captain Dreckley
  • Score: 0

12:16pm Mon 31 Dec 12

MerlinTheVoiceofReason2 says...

eddyo wrote:
Rover Pete wrote:
Has anybody a clue as to what Venky's are trying to do with Rovers?
They have not done one single thing right. How on earth did this shower end up so called millionaires? It must be very easy to make money in India. The farce still goes on. Singh is obviously crazy and totally out of his depth but Venky's still trust him and think he can walk on water.
We are going down to League 1 - no question. But why, oh why, are Venky's so happy to see it happen? There is nothing in it for them, is there?
Now it looks as though Givet, Pederson, Dunn and Robinson are going to be sold in January. Another bad move and a downwards step. Do Venky's know or care how stupid they have made themselves and the few supporters (myself included!) that are still left going to matches?
Daddy started the Venkys business and like all spoiled, rich kids they will blow it all - a bit like Jack's brood.
Yes, it's a fantastic publicity vehicle for them. One of the Rao brothers said they had had more publicity for the Venky's brand than they could ever have imagined. Global coverage. The more farce there is at Ewood, the more coverage they get. Consider the cost of running Rovers to be a part of the global advertising/ marketing budget for the V H Group. The Club itself was bought by way of mortgage of assets.
[quote][p][bold]eddyo[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Rover Pete[/bold] wrote: Has anybody a clue as to what Venky's are trying to do with Rovers? They have not done one single thing right. How on earth did this shower end up so called millionaires? It must be very easy to make money in India. The farce still goes on. Singh is obviously crazy and totally out of his depth but Venky's still trust him and think he can walk on water. We are going down to League 1 - no question. But why, oh why, are Venky's so happy to see it happen? There is nothing in it for them, is there? Now it looks as though Givet, Pederson, Dunn and Robinson are going to be sold in January. Another bad move and a downwards step. Do Venky's know or care how stupid they have made themselves and the few supporters (myself included!) that are still left going to matches?[/p][/quote]Daddy started the Venkys business and like all spoiled, rich kids they will blow it all - a bit like Jack's brood.[/p][/quote]Yes, it's a fantastic publicity vehicle for them. One of the Rao brothers said they had had more publicity for the Venky's brand than they could ever have imagined. Global coverage. The more farce there is at Ewood, the more coverage they get. Consider the cost of running Rovers to be a part of the global advertising/ marketing budget for the V H Group. The Club itself was bought by way of mortgage of assets. MerlinTheVoiceofReason2
  • Score: 0

12:23pm Mon 31 Dec 12

BeardwoodB says...

Venkytrash wrote:
The global adviser was on the pitch after the dingles game being applauded!!!! He was without doubt a half wit then!!!! Why did people cheer this Malaysian tea boy then? I for one couldn't understand it?
Very well said, because some Rovers fans are as deluded as Singh after a beer.
[quote][p][bold]Venkytrash[/bold] wrote: The global adviser was on the pitch after the dingles game being applauded!!!! He was without doubt a half wit then!!!! Why did people cheer this Malaysian tea boy then? I for one couldn't understand it?[/p][/quote]Very well said, because some Rovers fans are as deluded as Singh after a beer. BeardwoodB
  • Score: 0

12:31pm Mon 31 Dec 12

MerlinTheVoiceofReason2 says...

Ray Gunn wrote:
Lets Just hope they get the right man for the job this time and that our lads can take some confidence from the win at oakwell, with that in mind saggy ping needs to go, i know alot on here are blowing up his arse, but as a global adviser your job is to advise, and lets be honest he's not done a great job at advising...the bloke knows very little about English football let alone how to listen to fans, he avoids questions like the plague and he's only aim is to please the chicken farmers and keep his well paid job....therefore OUT WITH PING....and i hope this past year has been a wake up call for the Chicken lot...and that you cant just appoint a bloke to global adviser because he's the same nationality as you, a coach because you like his Bollywood films or a manager because he comes on the cheep and will dance to your tune....it doesn't work like that in fooball...if anything if we were to have a global adviser then he should be British...and before the tree huggers start with the racist cr*p, there was none intended, but British/English football is marketed as a product and you need someone who has grown up with a product who has worked on the product, who has lived and breathed the product to be able to truly sell the product for it's true worth, but back to the venkys, this is there last chance to get it right, they need to leave the running of the club to the manager and his staff, they need to INVEST and invest wisely to get us back to the premier league and not to start penny pinching again, they need to get us fans back on their side, our club does need investment and to be honest as a fan i don't really care where it comes from as long as it's done in the best interest of the club and its supporters, yes the venkys are in this to make a profit, but to enable the owners to start making a profit there will be time of losses at the start, and this is largely down to their own stupidity by getting rid of some top people at the club, so now they have to start again and thus incur losses, but thats a way of life, if the venkys are in this for the long haul then its a small price to pay to build a successful football club....however if there intentions are to take, take, take from the club then they may as well pack their bags now because they may think of us LOWER CLASS fans as stupid, we're not and we can see through the haze of c*ap and they will never have the true backing of the fans and as such there will be no harmony at the club....HAPPY NEW YEAR GUYS AND GIRLS,,,,,,,COYB
Shebby is not the same nationality as the Venkys. They are Indian and he is Malaysian - born in Kluang, Johor.
[quote][p][bold]Ray Gunn[/bold] wrote: Lets Just hope they get the right man for the job this time and that our lads can take some confidence from the win at oakwell, with that in mind saggy ping needs to go, i know alot on here are blowing up his arse, but as a global adviser your job is to advise, and lets be honest he's not done a great job at advising...the bloke knows very little about English football let alone how to listen to fans, he avoids questions like the plague and he's only aim is to please the chicken farmers and keep his well paid job....therefore OUT WITH PING....and i hope this past year has been a wake up call for the Chicken lot...and that you cant just appoint a bloke to global adviser because he's the same nationality as you, a coach because you like his Bollywood films or a manager because he comes on the cheep and will dance to your tune....it doesn't work like that in fooball...if anything if we were to have a global adviser then he should be British...and before the tree huggers start with the racist cr*p, there was none intended, but British/English football is marketed as a product and you need someone who has grown up with a product who has worked on the product, who has lived and breathed the product to be able to truly sell the product for it's true worth, but back to the venkys, this is there last chance to get it right, they need to leave the running of the club to the manager and his staff, they need to INVEST and invest wisely to get us back to the premier league and not to start penny pinching again, they need to get us fans back on their side, our club does need investment and to be honest as a fan i don't really care where it comes from as long as it's done in the best interest of the club and its supporters, yes the venkys are in this to make a profit, but to enable the owners to start making a profit there will be time of losses at the start, and this is largely down to their own stupidity by getting rid of some top people at the club, so now they have to start again and thus incur losses, but thats a way of life, if the venkys are in this for the long haul then its a small price to pay to build a successful football club....however if there intentions are to take, take, take from the club then they may as well pack their bags now because they may think of us LOWER CLASS fans as stupid, we're not and we can see through the haze of c*ap and they will never have the true backing of the fans and as such there will be no harmony at the club....HAPPY NEW YEAR GUYS AND GIRLS,,,,,,,COYB[/p][/quote]Shebby is not the same nationality as the Venkys. They are Indian and he is Malaysian - born in Kluang, Johor. MerlinTheVoiceofReason2
  • Score: 0

12:35pm Mon 31 Dec 12

To.guy says...

So Bowyer confirms that he was not part of the decision to leave those senior players out of the squad on Saturday. Singh lied again.
So Bowyer confirms that he was not part of the decision to leave those senior players out of the squad on Saturday. Singh lied again. To.guy
  • Score: 0

12:39pm Mon 31 Dec 12

mike55 says...

Shebby Singh rather than wasting time showing Judan Ali how Rovers coach their team (not too well) should spend his time visiting Wigan Athletic, a glowing example of how a small town English club runs and operates a successful operation.It would be time well spent. Get the Venkys to arrange a visit too!!
Shebby Singh rather than wasting time showing Judan Ali how Rovers coach their team (not too well) should spend his time visiting Wigan Athletic, a glowing example of how a small town English club runs and operates a successful operation.It would be time well spent. Get the Venkys to arrange a visit too!! mike55
  • Score: 0

12:42pm Mon 31 Dec 12

Angry From Accrington says...

Well it looks like he has made his takeover official! This two bit mediocre Malaysian media muppet has elevated himself to the the role of running one of the oldest and proudest football clubs in England. If Shaw and Agnew stand back and allow this to happen they should hang their heads in shame and resign right now. Every syllable of his statement is designed to reinforce the fact that HE is call ing the shots and I simply can not believe that the Venky organisation can not see through this shallow snake. His appointment of Berg has cost the club 15 league places and at least £1.5m in compensation and yet he still has the temerity to flaunt himself on Radio 5, not realising that the sole purpose was to expose him to natuional ridicule. I feel that Venky's need to appoint an Intergallactic Advisor to the Global Advisor as quickly as possible and as Accrington is, of course, centre of the universe, I am happy to make myself available.
Well it looks like he has made his takeover official! This two bit mediocre Malaysian media muppet has elevated himself to the the role of running one of the oldest and proudest football clubs in England. If Shaw and Agnew stand back and allow this to happen they should hang their heads in shame and resign right now. Every syllable of his statement is designed to reinforce the fact that HE is call ing the shots and I simply can not believe that the Venky organisation can not see through this shallow snake. His appointment of Berg has cost the club 15 league places and at least £1.5m in compensation and yet he still has the temerity to flaunt himself on Radio 5, not realising that the sole purpose was to expose him to natuional ridicule. I feel that Venky's need to appoint an Intergallactic Advisor to the Global Advisor as quickly as possible and as Accrington is, of course, centre of the universe, I am happy to make myself available. Angry From Accrington
  • Score: 0

12:49pm Mon 31 Dec 12

Ray Gunn says...

MerlinTheVoiceofReas
on2
wrote:
Ray Gunn wrote:
Lets Just hope they get the right man for the job this time and that our lads can take some confidence from the win at oakwell, with that in mind saggy ping needs to go, i know alot on here are blowing up his arse, but as a global adviser your job is to advise, and lets be honest he's not done a great job at advising...the bloke knows very little about English football let alone how to listen to fans, he avoids questions like the plague and he's only aim is to please the chicken farmers and keep his well paid job....therefore OUT WITH PING....and i hope this past year has been a wake up call for the Chicken lot...and that you cant just appoint a bloke to global adviser because he's the same nationality as you, a coach because you like his Bollywood films or a manager because he comes on the cheep and will dance to your tune....it doesn't work like that in fooball...if anything if we were to have a global adviser then he should be British...and before the tree huggers start with the racist cr*p, there was none intended, but British/English football is marketed as a product and you need someone who has grown up with a product who has worked on the product, who has lived and breathed the product to be able to truly sell the product for it's true worth, but back to the venkys, this is there last chance to get it right, they need to leave the running of the club to the manager and his staff, they need to INVEST and invest wisely to get us back to the premier league and not to start penny pinching again, they need to get us fans back on their side, our club does need investment and to be honest as a fan i don't really care where it comes from as long as it's done in the best interest of the club and its supporters, yes the venkys are in this to make a profit, but to enable the owners to start making a profit there will be time of losses at the start, and this is largely down to their own stupidity by getting rid of some top people at the club, so now they have to start again and thus incur losses, but thats a way of life, if the venkys are in this for the long haul then its a small price to pay to build a successful football club....however if there intentions are to take, take, take from the club then they may as well pack their bags now because they may think of us LOWER CLASS fans as stupid, we're not and we can see through the haze of c*ap and they will never have the true backing of the fans and as such there will be no harmony at the club....HAPPY NEW YEAR GUYS AND GIRLS,,,,,,,COYB
Shebby is not the same nationality as the Venkys. They are Indian and he is Malaysian - born in Kluang, Johor.
out of all that i typed you pick up on this, it wasn't intended as a fact, more an example...omg
[quote][p][bold]MerlinTheVoiceofReas on2[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Ray Gunn[/bold] wrote: Lets Just hope they get the right man for the job this time and that our lads can take some confidence from the win at oakwell, with that in mind saggy ping needs to go, i know alot on here are blowing up his arse, but as a global adviser your job is to advise, and lets be honest he's not done a great job at advising...the bloke knows very little about English football let alone how to listen to fans, he avoids questions like the plague and he's only aim is to please the chicken farmers and keep his well paid job....therefore OUT WITH PING....and i hope this past year has been a wake up call for the Chicken lot...and that you cant just appoint a bloke to global adviser because he's the same nationality as you, a coach because you like his Bollywood films or a manager because he comes on the cheep and will dance to your tune....it doesn't work like that in fooball...if anything if we were to have a global adviser then he should be British...and before the tree huggers start with the racist cr*p, there was none intended, but British/English football is marketed as a product and you need someone who has grown up with a product who has worked on the product, who has lived and breathed the product to be able to truly sell the product for it's true worth, but back to the venkys, this is there last chance to get it right, they need to leave the running of the club to the manager and his staff, they need to INVEST and invest wisely to get us back to the premier league and not to start penny pinching again, they need to get us fans back on their side, our club does need investment and to be honest as a fan i don't really care where it comes from as long as it's done in the best interest of the club and its supporters, yes the venkys are in this to make a profit, but to enable the owners to start making a profit there will be time of losses at the start, and this is largely down to their own stupidity by getting rid of some top people at the club, so now they have to start again and thus incur losses, but thats a way of life, if the venkys are in this for the long haul then its a small price to pay to build a successful football club....however if there intentions are to take, take, take from the club then they may as well pack their bags now because they may think of us LOWER CLASS fans as stupid, we're not and we can see through the haze of c*ap and they will never have the true backing of the fans and as such there will be no harmony at the club....HAPPY NEW YEAR GUYS AND GIRLS,,,,,,,COYB[/p][/quote]Shebby is not the same nationality as the Venkys. They are Indian and he is Malaysian - born in Kluang, Johor.[/p][/quote]out of all that i typed you pick up on this, it wasn't intended as a fact, more an example...omg Ray Gunn
  • Score: 0

12:53pm Mon 31 Dec 12

blueblooded says...

mike55 wrote:
The continuing pantomime at Rovers is like watching the tv series Homeland - I have no idea who are the good guys and who are the bad guys. Indeed do we have any good guys at the club? SS seems to be playing 'Championship Manager',becoming more dictatorial by the day and developing a cult of personality which will eventually see him purge the enemies within (Shaw and Agnew) sooner rather than later. Meanwhile Shaw and Agnew go and grass to Mummy in India that SS is not playing fair and trying to oust them or at least go behind their backs.And the question beckons,who is putting out all these press leaks every day about all the shenanigans going on at Ewood?

Meanwhile we have disaffected players on high wages who will want to leave in January though I cannot imagine there will be too many takers.

At this moment in time I would rather Rovers did a Rangers- be demoted to whatever League and start again under different ownership but with Rovers true interests at heart ( and I say that supporting Rovers for over 60 years).

Why can't we have a decent owner and chairman like Dave Whelan,an ex Rover?
By the end of this week, either Singh will have gone or he will indeed become all-powerful.

My thoughts are that as Merlinthevoiceofreas
on2's very shrewd analysis, Shebby is trying to make his mark on the team and club and while I still maintain the rumours of him forcing team selections are exaggerated, I also feel he is wanting to become the next Wenger/Mourinho in the future after guiding this club to success as he believes he can. The Kean debacle has allowed him to cement his position, but he was brought in for exactly the reasons of "fighting the enemies" as he claims, as Venky's probably felt they were losing control of what was happening at the club.

That said, calling for Singh's dismissal is not going to be counter-productive at this moment, as will protesting or boycotting. He appointed Berg on results based continued employment,and fired him after deciding it wasn't working. As concerned as Venky's will have been by the continued tumble down turn results wise, they will probably at this moment breathing a sigh of relief that they didn't have to go through the Kean fiasco again and I very much doubt Singh has been damaged much by the sacking - probably a lot more damage from the bumbling interview the other day, but not significantly so.

The solution? Shout from the rooftops, Social media sites - Twitter especially, who should be the next manager. I don't particularly like Hughes, McLeish was my choice after Berg's sacking, but with him out of the running, Im putting my mark against Hughes.

Hughes has a HUGE backroom that follow him and he can bring stability to the club AND curb Singh's Championship Manager aspirations whilst we get the club back on an even keel.

Singh likes to listen to play to the crowds, let's voice in Unison our choices of REALISTIC and AVAILABLE managers that have either shown interest or you think would come to the club and do what is necessary.

HUGHES IN.
[quote][p][bold]mike55[/bold] wrote: The continuing pantomime at Rovers is like watching the tv series Homeland - I have no idea who are the good guys and who are the bad guys. Indeed do we have any good guys at the club? SS seems to be playing 'Championship Manager',becoming more dictatorial by the day and developing a cult of personality which will eventually see him purge the enemies within (Shaw and Agnew) sooner rather than later. Meanwhile Shaw and Agnew go and grass to Mummy in India that SS is not playing fair and trying to oust them or at least go behind their backs.And the question beckons,who is putting out all these press leaks every day about all the shenanigans going on at Ewood? Meanwhile we have disaffected players on high wages who will want to leave in January though I cannot imagine there will be too many takers. At this moment in time I would rather Rovers did a Rangers- be demoted to whatever League and start again under different ownership but with Rovers true interests at heart ( and I say that supporting Rovers for over 60 years). Why can't we have a decent owner and chairman like Dave Whelan,an ex Rover?[/p][/quote]By the end of this week, either Singh will have gone or he will indeed become all-powerful. My thoughts are that as Merlinthevoiceofreas on2's very shrewd analysis, Shebby is trying to make his mark on the team and club and while I still maintain the rumours of him forcing team selections are exaggerated, I also feel he is wanting to become the next Wenger/Mourinho in the future after guiding this club to success as he believes he can. The Kean debacle has allowed him to cement his position, but he was brought in for exactly the reasons of "fighting the enemies" as he claims, as Venky's probably felt they were losing control of what was happening at the club. That said, calling for Singh's dismissal is not going to be counter-productive at this moment, as will protesting or boycotting. He appointed Berg on results based continued employment,and fired him after deciding it wasn't working. As concerned as Venky's will have been by the continued tumble down turn results wise, they will probably at this moment breathing a sigh of relief that they didn't have to go through the Kean fiasco again and I very much doubt Singh has been damaged much by the sacking - probably a lot more damage from the bumbling interview the other day, but not significantly so. The solution? Shout from the rooftops, Social media sites - Twitter especially, who should be the next manager. I don't particularly like Hughes, McLeish was my choice after Berg's sacking, but with him out of the running, Im putting my mark against Hughes. Hughes has a HUGE backroom that follow him and he can bring stability to the club AND curb Singh's Championship Manager aspirations whilst we get the club back on an even keel. Singh likes to listen to play to the crowds, let's voice in Unison our choices of REALISTIC and AVAILABLE managers that have either shown interest or you think would come to the club and do what is necessary. HUGHES IN. blueblooded
  • Score: 0

12:55pm Mon 31 Dec 12

blueblooded says...

IS going to be counter - productive I meant to say. Whoopsee.
IS going to be counter - productive I meant to say. Whoopsee. blueblooded
  • Score: 0

12:55pm Mon 31 Dec 12

Is Eckersley playing? says...

mike55 wrote:
Shebby Singh rather than wasting time showing Judan Ali how Rovers coach their team (not too well) should spend his time visiting Wigan Athletic, a glowing example of how a small town English club runs and operates a successful operation.It would be time well spent. Get the Venkys to arrange a visit too!!
What a good post! A first class chairman and a loyal, well respected manager. What a combination!
[quote][p][bold]mike55[/bold] wrote: Shebby Singh rather than wasting time showing Judan Ali how Rovers coach their team (not too well) should spend his time visiting Wigan Athletic, a glowing example of how a small town English club runs and operates a successful operation.It would be time well spent. Get the Venkys to arrange a visit too!![/p][/quote]What a good post! A first class chairman and a loyal, well respected manager. What a combination! Is Eckersley playing?
  • Score: 0

1:02pm Mon 31 Dec 12

bburnrover says...

The main problem lies with the Venkeys they cannot appreciate English football and eliev Shebby is what they require to alleviate their defeciencies.
We are not going to ge new ownes so we have topt up with this as we put up with Kean's disastrous time here.The Venkeys need to let English people run the club and stay out of it alltogether.Alan Curbishly is the best name mentioned but Mark Hughs would be great as I think he was our best ever maager especially in the bargain basement transfers he made mo money rom his transfers than he was paid.
The main problem lies with the Venkeys they cannot appreciate English football and eliev Shebby is what they require to alleviate their defeciencies. We are not going to ge new ownes so we have topt up with this as we put up with Kean's disastrous time here.The Venkeys need to let English people run the club and stay out of it alltogether.Alan Curbishly is the best name mentioned but Mark Hughs would be great as I think he was our best ever maager especially in the bargain basement transfers he made mo money rom his transfers than he was paid. bburnrover
  • Score: 0

1:02pm Mon 31 Dec 12

McRover says...

MerlinTheVoiceofReas
on2
wrote:
McRover wrote:
There's no doubt that Singh is a complete buffon, I'd agree with you there. I do believe, however, that Agnew and Shaw are the real villans here and am in no doubt that all the stories leaked to press come from them. They were both brought in by Kean and they're allegiance is to a certain management company run by a certain agent. They ALL need to be removed and replaced with decent football people who don't have their own agenda. Unfortunately I don't believe Venkys have the sense to do this.Worrying times ahead.
Shebby's 5 Live interview was a masterclass in obfuscation. However, if you read between the lines you can just about decipher what he's (wrongly in my view) trying to do.
He prattled on about watching BRFC for many years and us not having a "footballing philosophy" - that's key to his whole approach and the basis for him interfering at every level at the club. What he wants is (1) to decide and impose his own footballing philosophy and style; (2) put in place a coaching regime that will deliver that philosophy - hence his moves to put in coaches first before a manager, who not only teach footballing skills but do the fitness, diet and psychology stuff; and then (3) a manager is put in place to motivate the team on match days. In Shebby's model, the manager is almost superfluous - and therefore doesn't need to be expensive, doesn't need to be influential and doesn't need to be a big name. In fact, he's just a figurehead and someone who speaks with the media. In order to maintain this "philosophy", Shebby WILL get involved in transfers and team selection. It is clear that SS thinks Portugese players in particular fit in well with his "philosophy" and they are cheap to boot. Unfortunately, this model is not really in use in England. Managers DO have a much bigger role - they do get involved in transfers (of course sanctioned by the chequebook holders), they do select the team and they do decide on footballing tactics and style of play. What SS and Venkys are trying to do - and it won't work - is flip the English model on its' head. Hence the total mess at Ewood. Hence the internal divisions - Agnew, Shaw et al wanting to do things in the traditional way, SS trying to take complete control of the club to impose his vision and having to talk nonsense all the time to the media to explain these bizarre comedic chain of events. Let Shaw take control and bring back some sanity.
Can't disagree with any of that except that Shaw is not to be trusted either. From what I've been told from someone who works at Brockhall, he and Agnew are assocciated wth the management company that Kean belonged to and we all know who runs that particular company. They all need running out of town and the sooner the better.
[quote][p][bold]MerlinTheVoiceofReas on2[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]McRover[/bold] wrote: There's no doubt that Singh is a complete buffon, I'd agree with you there. I do believe, however, that Agnew and Shaw are the real villans here and am in no doubt that all the stories leaked to press come from them. They were both brought in by Kean and they're allegiance is to a certain management company run by a certain agent. They ALL need to be removed and replaced with decent football people who don't have their own agenda. Unfortunately I don't believe Venkys have the sense to do this.Worrying times ahead.[/p][/quote]Shebby's 5 Live interview was a masterclass in obfuscation. However, if you read between the lines you can just about decipher what he's (wrongly in my view) trying to do. He prattled on about watching BRFC for many years and us not having a "footballing philosophy" - that's key to his whole approach and the basis for him interfering at every level at the club. What he wants is (1) to decide and impose his own footballing philosophy and style; (2) put in place a coaching regime that will deliver that philosophy - hence his moves to put in coaches first before a manager, who not only teach footballing skills but do the fitness, diet and psychology stuff; and then (3) a manager is put in place to motivate the team on match days. In Shebby's model, the manager is almost superfluous - and therefore doesn't need to be expensive, doesn't need to be influential and doesn't need to be a big name. In fact, he's just a figurehead and someone who speaks with the media. In order to maintain this "philosophy", Shebby WILL get involved in transfers and team selection. It is clear that SS thinks Portugese players in particular fit in well with his "philosophy" and they are cheap to boot. Unfortunately, this model is not really in use in England. Managers DO have a much bigger role - they do get involved in transfers (of course sanctioned by the chequebook holders), they do select the team and they do decide on footballing tactics and style of play. What SS and Venkys are trying to do - and it won't work - is flip the English model on its' head. Hence the total mess at Ewood. Hence the internal divisions - Agnew, Shaw et al wanting to do things in the traditional way, SS trying to take complete control of the club to impose his vision and having to talk nonsense all the time to the media to explain these bizarre comedic chain of events. Let Shaw take control and bring back some sanity.[/p][/quote]Can't disagree with any of that except that Shaw is not to be trusted either. From what I've been told from someone who works at Brockhall, he and Agnew are assocciated wth the management company that Kean belonged to and we all know who runs that particular company. They all need running out of town and the sooner the better. McRover
  • Score: 0

1:10pm Mon 31 Dec 12

dangerous dave says...

We all know what Shabby Singh wants - just wish someone would give it to him - equally Shaw and definately Agnew and Hendry need removing from their posts in favour of new Directors with credibility within the game - as for our Mr Coar - well you wont here anything from him - no he wont upset the applecart for fear of being sacked then loosing his position within the FA - again he is in it for himself!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!
If you have nt read the Mail its a must giving the best insight to whats happening in repect of power struggle/legal fightings within the club - yes our beloved Club is in tatters with the antics of these morons!!!!!!!
OUT WITH THE LOT OF THEM
We all know what Shabby Singh wants - just wish someone would give it to him - equally Shaw and definately Agnew and Hendry need removing from their posts in favour of new Directors with credibility within the game - as for our Mr Coar - well you wont here anything from him - no he wont upset the applecart for fear of being sacked then loosing his position within the FA - again he is in it for himself!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!! If you have nt read the Mail its a must giving the best insight to whats happening in repect of power struggle/legal fightings within the club - yes our beloved Club is in tatters with the antics of these morons!!!!!!! OUT WITH THE LOT OF THEM dangerous dave
  • Score: 0

1:15pm Mon 31 Dec 12

Wild Rover says...

Cant be bothered with the quote button but I agree (unusual event) with Merlin's post above.It is pretty much spot on in my view
Rovers fans, keep steady and don't panic ! There always hope.....I think?
Cant be bothered with the quote button but I agree (unusual event) with Merlin's post above.It is pretty much spot on in my view Rovers fans, keep steady and don't panic ! There always hope.....I think? Wild Rover
  • Score: 0

1:43pm Mon 31 Dec 12

Jonny Bovril says...

sonny wrote:
More Anti-Shebby Singh propaganda from Paul Agnew & Derek Shaw doing the rounds this weekend in the tabloids, Agnew&Shaw are the really poison at BRFC any fan that does a little research(other than reading the tabloids) knows that. Singh's a nutter but his heart seems to be in the right place, Shebbys just very misguided because his so-called Colleagues have being playing him from day one(just like they have been playing the venkys from day 1 of there take-over).
Agreed sonny. Note just some of the stories that have got to the LT over recent days regarding all the Portuguese players in the team, SS doing the training, KM and JA hired as coaches etc. All since refuted and none proved correct - as yet. PA has strong press links and I suspect he is behind a lot of the negative stuff coming from within. People who have met SS tend to say he is eccentric, probably out of his depth, but has generally been true to his word. It wouldn't surprise me to find out that the managers/ coaches A & S have been pushing are linked to the Agent who shall remain nameless.
I read a blog lately from Glen Mullen where he also casts doubts over the role PA plays at the club. Truth is none of us really know. We all suspect 'dark forces' at the club. I just don't think it's SS. That said I'd have JW back in a second! Aye
[quote][p][bold]sonny[/bold] wrote: More Anti-Shebby Singh propaganda from Paul Agnew & Derek Shaw doing the rounds this weekend in the tabloids, Agnew&Shaw are the really poison at BRFC any fan that does a little research(other than reading the tabloids) knows that. Singh's a nutter but his heart seems to be in the right place, Shebbys just very misguided because his so-called Colleagues have being playing him from day one(just like they have been playing the venkys from day 1 of there take-over).[/p][/quote]Agreed sonny. Note just some of the stories that have got to the LT over recent days regarding all the Portuguese players in the team, SS doing the training, KM and JA hired as coaches etc. All since refuted and none proved correct - as yet. PA has strong press links and I suspect he is behind a lot of the negative stuff coming from within. People who have met SS tend to say he is eccentric, probably out of his depth, but has generally been true to his word. It wouldn't surprise me to find out that the managers/ coaches A & S have been pushing are linked to the Agent who shall remain nameless. I read a blog lately from Glen Mullen where he also casts doubts over the role PA plays at the club. Truth is none of us really know. We all suspect 'dark forces' at the club. I just don't think it's SS. That said I'd have JW back in a second! Aye Jonny Bovril
  • Score: 0

1:48pm Mon 31 Dec 12

srvp28 says...

ChrisDeBerg wrote:
Couldnt make a direct anagram work with shebbys title of 'Shebby Singh, Global Advisor'... Here are some words made from the letters in it though:

His Royal Badness
Load bearing boss
Early diagnosis
Behaving Badly
Biobehavioral
Diagnosis, oral bs


RTID
Challenge accepted, so to speak. It could take a while though so I'll leave you with an anagram I prepared earlier.

My fantasy football team is called, 'Suave Canteen Kits'.

Here's a clue, it has nothing to do with fancy tabards...
[quote][p][bold]ChrisDeBerg[/bold] wrote: Couldnt make a direct anagram work with shebbys title of 'Shebby Singh, Global Advisor'... Here are some words made from the letters in it though: His Royal Badness Load bearing boss Early diagnosis Behaving Badly Biobehavioral Diagnosis, oral bs RTID[/p][/quote]Challenge accepted, so to speak. It could take a while though so I'll leave you with an anagram I prepared earlier. My fantasy football team is called, 'Suave Canteen Kits'. Here's a clue, it has nothing to do with fancy tabards... srvp28
  • Score: 0

1:54pm Mon 31 Dec 12

edmy says...

Read the latest from the Daily Mail We have a contagious disease at Ewood it is called the Venkys. all it touches are doomed.
"THE VENKYS" They sacked Sam, They appointed Kean, They got rid of a fantastic Board and several other prominent office staff. They presided over the removal of several senior players. They appointed Shebby. Who else is there to blame. If the don't sell soon we won't have a club worth jacks**t to sell.
Revealed: From boardroom split to player revolt, the inside story of crisis engulfing Blackburn

Senior players revolt after poor start to season
Derek Shaw wants controversial Shebby Singh out
Club no closer to naming successor to Henning Berg


Read more: http://www.dailymail
.co.uk/sport/footbal
l/article-2255191/Bl
ackburn-Rovers-crisi
s-players-revolt-She
bby-Singh
Read the latest from the Daily Mail We have a contagious disease at Ewood it is called the Venkys. all it touches are doomed. "THE VENKYS" They sacked Sam, They appointed Kean, They got rid of a fantastic Board and several other prominent office staff. They presided over the removal of several senior players. They appointed Shebby. Who else is there to blame. If the don't sell soon we won't have a club worth jacks**t to sell. Revealed: From boardroom split to player revolt, the inside story of crisis engulfing Blackburn Senior players revolt after poor start to season Derek Shaw wants controversial Shebby Singh out Club no closer to naming successor to Henning Berg Read more: http://www.dailymail .co.uk/sport/footbal l/article-2255191/Bl ackburn-Rovers-crisi s-players-revolt-She bby-Singh edmy
  • Score: 0

2:09pm Mon 31 Dec 12

Dukes says...

hope its a experience manager shebby i still want out.
hope its a experience manager shebby i still want out. Dukes
  • Score: 0

2:26pm Mon 31 Dec 12

BAPA4 says...

We keep thinking it can't possibly get any worse and then it does.We are the laughing stock of the football world thanks to Venky's et al.GET THIS SHABBY MAN AWAY FROM OUR CLUB.
We keep thinking it can't possibly get any worse and then it does.We are the laughing stock of the football world thanks to Venky's et al.GET THIS SHABBY MAN AWAY FROM OUR CLUB. BAPA4
  • Score: 0

2:26pm Mon 31 Dec 12

bburnrover says...

S Singh out please! who else would allow an idiot like this guy loose on their football club? He is like a young lad on fantasy football.

You are only as good as the people yu employ so Venkeys employed Singh and Singh employed Berg -I rest my case.
S Singh out please! who else would allow an idiot like this guy loose on their football club? He is like a young lad on fantasy football. You are only as good as the people yu employ so Venkeys employed Singh and Singh employed Berg -I rest my case. bburnrover
  • Score: 0

2:35pm Mon 31 Dec 12

Dan11 says...

So Shabby Minge has presented some names to DESAI. What is DESAI going to chose the manager based on?
I like him because he has a SLAP HEAD like Kean? The Blind leading the Blind it really is.
So Shabby Minge has presented some names to DESAI. What is DESAI going to chose the manager based on? I like him because he has a SLAP HEAD like Kean? The Blind leading the Blind it really is. Dan11
  • Score: 0

2:44pm Mon 31 Dec 12

bobinspain says...

blueblooded wrote:
mike55 wrote:
The continuing pantomime at Rovers is like watching the tv series Homeland - I have no idea who are the good guys and who are the bad guys. Indeed do we have any good guys at the club? SS seems to be playing 'Championship Manager',becoming more dictatorial by the day and developing a cult of personality which will eventually see him purge the enemies within (Shaw and Agnew) sooner rather than later. Meanwhile Shaw and Agnew go and grass to Mummy in India that SS is not playing fair and trying to oust them or at least go behind their backs.And the question beckons,who is putting out all these press leaks every day about all the shenanigans going on at Ewood?

Meanwhile we have disaffected players on high wages who will want to leave in January though I cannot imagine there will be too many takers.

At this moment in time I would rather Rovers did a Rangers- be demoted to whatever League and start again under different ownership but with Rovers true interests at heart ( and I say that supporting Rovers for over 60 years).

Why can't we have a decent owner and chairman like Dave Whelan,an ex Rover?
By the end of this week, either Singh will have gone or he will indeed become all-powerful.

My thoughts are that as Merlinthevoiceofreas

on2's very shrewd analysis, Shebby is trying to make his mark on the team and club and while I still maintain the rumours of him forcing team selections are exaggerated, I also feel he is wanting to become the next Wenger/Mourinho in the future after guiding this club to success as he believes he can. The Kean debacle has allowed him to cement his position, but he was brought in for exactly the reasons of "fighting the enemies" as he claims, as Venky's probably felt they were losing control of what was happening at the club.

That said, calling for Singh's dismissal is not going to be counter-productive at this moment, as will protesting or boycotting. He appointed Berg on results based continued employment,and fired him after deciding it wasn't working. As concerned as Venky's will have been by the continued tumble down turn results wise, they will probably at this moment breathing a sigh of relief that they didn't have to go through the Kean fiasco again and I very much doubt Singh has been damaged much by the sacking - probably a lot more damage from the bumbling interview the other day, but not significantly so.

The solution? Shout from the rooftops, Social media sites - Twitter especially, who should be the next manager. I don't particularly like Hughes, McLeish was my choice after Berg's sacking, but with him out of the running, Im putting my mark against Hughes.

Hughes has a HUGE backroom that follow him and he can bring stability to the club AND curb Singh's Championship Manager aspirations whilst we get the club back on an even keel.

Singh likes to listen to play to the crowds, let's voice in Unison our choices of REALISTIC and AVAILABLE managers that have either shown interest or you think would come to the club and do what is necessary.

HUGHES IN.
As a neutral observer, I can't understand your faith in Hughes as a manager.
He's hardly inspirational. He had an appalling track record at QPR, where incidentally, he spent like a man with no arms and insisted on being surrounded by his own (highly paid) acolytes.
Given that Venky's have short arms and notoriously long pockets, I doubt they'd fork out the spondulicks required to tempt him to BRFC in any event.
I wouldn't pay him to run a whelk stall.
[quote][p][bold]blueblooded[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]mike55[/bold] wrote: The continuing pantomime at Rovers is like watching the tv series Homeland - I have no idea who are the good guys and who are the bad guys. Indeed do we have any good guys at the club? SS seems to be playing 'Championship Manager',becoming more dictatorial by the day and developing a cult of personality which will eventually see him purge the enemies within (Shaw and Agnew) sooner rather than later. Meanwhile Shaw and Agnew go and grass to Mummy in India that SS is not playing fair and trying to oust them or at least go behind their backs.And the question beckons,who is putting out all these press leaks every day about all the shenanigans going on at Ewood? Meanwhile we have disaffected players on high wages who will want to leave in January though I cannot imagine there will be too many takers. At this moment in time I would rather Rovers did a Rangers- be demoted to whatever League and start again under different ownership but with Rovers true interests at heart ( and I say that supporting Rovers for over 60 years). Why can't we have a decent owner and chairman like Dave Whelan,an ex Rover?[/p][/quote]By the end of this week, either Singh will have gone or he will indeed become all-powerful. My thoughts are that as Merlinthevoiceofreas on2's very shrewd analysis, Shebby is trying to make his mark on the team and club and while I still maintain the rumours of him forcing team selections are exaggerated, I also feel he is wanting to become the next Wenger/Mourinho in the future after guiding this club to success as he believes he can. The Kean debacle has allowed him to cement his position, but he was brought in for exactly the reasons of "fighting the enemies" as he claims, as Venky's probably felt they were losing control of what was happening at the club. That said, calling for Singh's dismissal is not going to be counter-productive at this moment, as will protesting or boycotting. He appointed Berg on results based continued employment,and fired him after deciding it wasn't working. As concerned as Venky's will have been by the continued tumble down turn results wise, they will probably at this moment breathing a sigh of relief that they didn't have to go through the Kean fiasco again and I very much doubt Singh has been damaged much by the sacking - probably a lot more damage from the bumbling interview the other day, but not significantly so. The solution? Shout from the rooftops, Social media sites - Twitter especially, who should be the next manager. I don't particularly like Hughes, McLeish was my choice after Berg's sacking, but with him out of the running, Im putting my mark against Hughes. Hughes has a HUGE backroom that follow him and he can bring stability to the club AND curb Singh's Championship Manager aspirations whilst we get the club back on an even keel. Singh likes to listen to play to the crowds, let's voice in Unison our choices of REALISTIC and AVAILABLE managers that have either shown interest or you think would come to the club and do what is necessary. HUGHES IN.[/p][/quote]As a neutral observer, I can't understand your faith in Hughes as a manager. He's hardly inspirational. He had an appalling track record at QPR, where incidentally, he spent like a man with no arms and insisted on being surrounded by his own (highly paid) acolytes. Given that Venky's have short arms and notoriously long pockets, I doubt they'd fork out the spondulicks required to tempt him to BRFC in any event. I wouldn't pay him to run a whelk stall. bobinspain
  • Score: 0

2:44pm Mon 31 Dec 12

blueblooded says...

edmy wrote:
Read the latest from the Daily Mail We have a contagious disease at Ewood it is called the Venkys. all it touches are doomed.
"THE VENKYS" They sacked Sam, They appointed Kean, They got rid of a fantastic Board and several other prominent office staff. They presided over the removal of several senior players. They appointed Shebby. Who else is there to blame. If the don't sell soon we won't have a club worth jacks**t to sell.
Revealed: From boardroom split to player revolt, the inside story of crisis engulfing Blackburn

Senior players revolt after poor start to season
Derek Shaw wants controversial Shebby Singh out
Club no closer to naming successor to Henning Berg


Read more: http://www.dailymail

.co.uk/sport/footbal

l/article-2255191/Bl

ackburn-Rovers-crisi

s-players-revolt-She

bby-Singh
Seriously?

You call that inside story?

Every man and his dog knows senior players were not impressed with Berg's appointment and the Daily Fail's exclusive already tells you who spun THAT leak.

"Shaw, An experienced administrator.. "

"That was the last straw.." Really Derek? Haven't heard an awful lot from you or that other Anderson stooge up to now. What happened? Singh taking all your power away to continue stealing money from the club via your dodgy agent dealings spoiled your plans?

As Sonny said, Singh may be a lot of things, but stripping the club of its assets isnt one of them. His ambitions are much less sinister - small comfort that it is - but it's becoming very apparent now who the "enemy" he referred to are, and the sooner they're gone the better.

With regard to the Senior players who are not happy, you are getting premiership wages to sit on your butts and to be brutally honest, you are average to downright mediocre in some cases, and if you want away in January, feel free to go. I very much doubt the big clubs are going to be hammering at the door to get most of you, but all the best and thank you for your contribution over the years is all I have to say to you.

HUGHES IN.
[quote][p][bold]edmy[/bold] wrote: Read the latest from the Daily Mail We have a contagious disease at Ewood it is called the Venkys. all it touches are doomed. "THE VENKYS" They sacked Sam, They appointed Kean, They got rid of a fantastic Board and several other prominent office staff. They presided over the removal of several senior players. They appointed Shebby. Who else is there to blame. If the don't sell soon we won't have a club worth jacks**t to sell. Revealed: From boardroom split to player revolt, the inside story of crisis engulfing Blackburn Senior players revolt after poor start to season Derek Shaw wants controversial Shebby Singh out Club no closer to naming successor to Henning Berg Read more: http://www.dailymail .co.uk/sport/footbal l/article-2255191/Bl ackburn-Rovers-crisi s-players-revolt-She bby-Singh[/p][/quote]Seriously? You call that inside story? Every man and his dog knows senior players were not impressed with Berg's appointment and the Daily Fail's exclusive already tells you who spun THAT leak. "Shaw, An experienced administrator.. " "That was the last straw.." Really Derek? Haven't heard an awful lot from you or that other Anderson stooge up to now. What happened? Singh taking all your power away to continue stealing money from the club via your dodgy agent dealings spoiled your plans? As Sonny said, Singh may be a lot of things, but stripping the club of its assets isnt one of them. His ambitions are much less sinister - small comfort that it is - but it's becoming very apparent now who the "enemy" he referred to are, and the sooner they're gone the better. With regard to the Senior players who are not happy, you are getting premiership wages to sit on your butts and to be brutally honest, you are average to downright mediocre in some cases, and if you want away in January, feel free to go. I very much doubt the big clubs are going to be hammering at the door to get most of you, but all the best and thank you for your contribution over the years is all I have to say to you. HUGHES IN. blueblooded
  • Score: 0

2:58pm Mon 31 Dec 12

blueblooded says...

bobinspain wrote:
blueblooded wrote:
mike55 wrote:
The continuing pantomime at Rovers is like watching the tv series Homeland - I have no idea who are the good guys and who are the bad guys. Indeed do we have any good guys at the club? SS seems to be playing 'Championship Manager',becoming more dictatorial by the day and developing a cult of personality which will eventually see him purge the enemies within (Shaw and Agnew) sooner rather than later. Meanwhile Shaw and Agnew go and grass to Mummy in India that SS is not playing fair and trying to oust them or at least go behind their backs.And the question beckons,who is putting out all these press leaks every day about all the shenanigans going on at Ewood?

Meanwhile we have disaffected players on high wages who will want to leave in January though I cannot imagine there will be too many takers.

At this moment in time I would rather Rovers did a Rangers- be demoted to whatever League and start again under different ownership but with Rovers true interests at heart ( and I say that supporting Rovers for over 60 years).

Why can't we have a decent owner and chairman like Dave Whelan,an ex Rover?
By the end of this week, either Singh will have gone or he will indeed become all-powerful.

My thoughts are that as Merlinthevoiceofreas


on2's very shrewd analysis, Shebby is trying to make his mark on the team and club and while I still maintain the rumours of him forcing team selections are exaggerated, I also feel he is wanting to become the next Wenger/Mourinho in the future after guiding this club to success as he believes he can. The Kean debacle has allowed him to cement his position, but he was brought in for exactly the reasons of "fighting the enemies" as he claims, as Venky's probably felt they were losing control of what was happening at the club.

That said, calling for Singh's dismissal is not going to be counter-productive at this moment, as will protesting or boycotting. He appointed Berg on results based continued employment,and fired him after deciding it wasn't working. As concerned as Venky's will have been by the continued tumble down turn results wise, they will probably at this moment breathing a sigh of relief that they didn't have to go through the Kean fiasco again and I very much doubt Singh has been damaged much by the sacking - probably a lot more damage from the bumbling interview the other day, but not significantly so.

The solution? Shout from the rooftops, Social media sites - Twitter especially, who should be the next manager. I don't particularly like Hughes, McLeish was my choice after Berg's sacking, but with him out of the running, Im putting my mark against Hughes.

Hughes has a HUGE backroom that follow him and he can bring stability to the club AND curb Singh's Championship Manager aspirations whilst we get the club back on an even keel.

Singh likes to listen to play to the crowds, let's voice in Unison our choices of REALISTIC and AVAILABLE managers that have either shown interest or you think would come to the club and do what is necessary.

HUGHES IN.
As a neutral observer, I can't understand your faith in Hughes as a manager.
He's hardly inspirational. He had an appalling track record at QPR, where incidentally, he spent like a man with no arms and insisted on being surrounded by his own (highly paid) acolytes.
Given that Venky's have short arms and notoriously long pockets, I doubt they'd fork out the spondulicks required to tempt him to BRFC in any event.
I wouldn't pay him to run a whelk stall.
As I said Bob, not my first choice, but we need a STRONG experienced manager with leadership and his own backroom. If not Hughes, it still needs someone who can stabilise the team and remove the need for all this extra "administration" and "advisor" garbage that's corrupting the club into oblivion.

Who would be your choice?
[quote][p][bold]bobinspain[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]blueblooded[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]mike55[/bold] wrote: The continuing pantomime at Rovers is like watching the tv series Homeland - I have no idea who are the good guys and who are the bad guys. Indeed do we have any good guys at the club? SS seems to be playing 'Championship Manager',becoming more dictatorial by the day and developing a cult of personality which will eventually see him purge the enemies within (Shaw and Agnew) sooner rather than later. Meanwhile Shaw and Agnew go and grass to Mummy in India that SS is not playing fair and trying to oust them or at least go behind their backs.And the question beckons,who is putting out all these press leaks every day about all the shenanigans going on at Ewood? Meanwhile we have disaffected players on high wages who will want to leave in January though I cannot imagine there will be too many takers. At this moment in time I would rather Rovers did a Rangers- be demoted to whatever League and start again under different ownership but with Rovers true interests at heart ( and I say that supporting Rovers for over 60 years). Why can't we have a decent owner and chairman like Dave Whelan,an ex Rover?[/p][/quote]By the end of this week, either Singh will have gone or he will indeed become all-powerful. My thoughts are that as Merlinthevoiceofreas on2's very shrewd analysis, Shebby is trying to make his mark on the team and club and while I still maintain the rumours of him forcing team selections are exaggerated, I also feel he is wanting to become the next Wenger/Mourinho in the future after guiding this club to success as he believes he can. The Kean debacle has allowed him to cement his position, but he was brought in for exactly the reasons of "fighting the enemies" as he claims, as Venky's probably felt they were losing control of what was happening at the club. That said, calling for Singh's dismissal is not going to be counter-productive at this moment, as will protesting or boycotting. He appointed Berg on results based continued employment,and fired him after deciding it wasn't working. As concerned as Venky's will have been by the continued tumble down turn results wise, they will probably at this moment breathing a sigh of relief that they didn't have to go through the Kean fiasco again and I very much doubt Singh has been damaged much by the sacking - probably a lot more damage from the bumbling interview the other day, but not significantly so. The solution? Shout from the rooftops, Social media sites - Twitter especially, who should be the next manager. I don't particularly like Hughes, McLeish was my choice after Berg's sacking, but with him out of the running, Im putting my mark against Hughes. Hughes has a HUGE backroom that follow him and he can bring stability to the club AND curb Singh's Championship Manager aspirations whilst we get the club back on an even keel. Singh likes to listen to play to the crowds, let's voice in Unison our choices of REALISTIC and AVAILABLE managers that have either shown interest or you think would come to the club and do what is necessary. HUGHES IN.[/p][/quote]As a neutral observer, I can't understand your faith in Hughes as a manager. He's hardly inspirational. He had an appalling track record at QPR, where incidentally, he spent like a man with no arms and insisted on being surrounded by his own (highly paid) acolytes. Given that Venky's have short arms and notoriously long pockets, I doubt they'd fork out the spondulicks required to tempt him to BRFC in any event. I wouldn't pay him to run a whelk stall.[/p][/quote]As I said Bob, not my first choice, but we need a STRONG experienced manager with leadership and his own backroom. If not Hughes, it still needs someone who can stabilise the team and remove the need for all this extra "administration" and "advisor" garbage that's corrupting the club into oblivion. Who would be your choice? blueblooded
  • Score: 0

3:27pm Mon 31 Dec 12

lancs1985 says...

lancs1985 wrote:
A club full of 1st class idiots
Shaw trashed Preston
Shebby doesn't no his arse from elbow
And Agnew well well
Keans little bum licker, changing job titles, making senior staff jobs untenable ie John newsham,

Get the whole sherbang down the m65 to dingle land

Rovers will be same or build again till these 3pillocks are gone!!!!!

RIP BRFC
Will never be the same again
[quote][p][bold]lancs1985[/bold] wrote: A club full of 1st class idiots Shaw trashed Preston Shebby doesn't no his arse from elbow And Agnew well well Keans little bum licker, changing job titles, making senior staff jobs untenable ie John newsham, Get the whole sherbang down the m65 to dingle land Rovers will be same or build again till these 3pillocks are gone!!!!! RIP BRFC[/p][/quote]Will never be the same again lancs1985
  • Score: 0

3:29pm Mon 31 Dec 12

srvp28 says...

blueblooded wrote:
edmy wrote:
Read the latest from the Daily Mail We have a contagious disease at Ewood it is called the Venkys. all it touches are doomed.
"THE VENKYS" They sacked Sam, They appointed Kean, They got rid of a fantastic Board and several other prominent office staff. They presided over the removal of several senior players. They appointed Shebby. Who else is there to blame. If the don't sell soon we won't have a club worth jacks**t to sell.
Revealed: From boardroom split to player revolt, the inside story of crisis engulfing Blackburn

Senior players revolt after poor start to season
Derek Shaw wants controversial Shebby Singh out
Club no closer to naming successor to Henning Berg


Read more: http://www.dailymail


.co.uk/sport/footbal


l/article-2255191/Bl


ackburn-Rovers-crisi


s-players-revolt-She


bby-Singh
Seriously?

You call that inside story?

Every man and his dog knows senior players were not impressed with Berg's appointment and the Daily Fail's exclusive already tells you who spun THAT leak.

"Shaw, An experienced administrator.. "

"That was the last straw.." Really Derek? Haven't heard an awful lot from you or that other Anderson stooge up to now. What happened? Singh taking all your power away to continue stealing money from the club via your dodgy agent dealings spoiled your plans?

As Sonny said, Singh may be a lot of things, but stripping the club of its assets isnt one of them. His ambitions are much less sinister - small comfort that it is - but it's becoming very apparent now who the "enemy" he referred to are, and the sooner they're gone the better.

With regard to the Senior players who are not happy, you are getting premiership wages to sit on your butts and to be brutally honest, you are average to downright mediocre in some cases, and if you want away in January, feel free to go. I very much doubt the big clubs are going to be hammering at the door to get most of you, but all the best and thank you for your contribution over the years is all I have to say to you.

HUGHES IN.
In what capacity can Shaw or Agnew make money from any transfer dealings exactly?
[quote][p][bold]blueblooded[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]edmy[/bold] wrote: Read the latest from the Daily Mail We have a contagious disease at Ewood it is called the Venkys. all it touches are doomed. "THE VENKYS" They sacked Sam, They appointed Kean, They got rid of a fantastic Board and several other prominent office staff. They presided over the removal of several senior players. They appointed Shebby. Who else is there to blame. If the don't sell soon we won't have a club worth jacks**t to sell. Revealed: From boardroom split to player revolt, the inside story of crisis engulfing Blackburn Senior players revolt after poor start to season Derek Shaw wants controversial Shebby Singh out Club no closer to naming successor to Henning Berg Read more: http://www.dailymail .co.uk/sport/footbal l/article-2255191/Bl ackburn-Rovers-crisi s-players-revolt-She bby-Singh[/p][/quote]Seriously? You call that inside story? Every man and his dog knows senior players were not impressed with Berg's appointment and the Daily Fail's exclusive already tells you who spun THAT leak. "Shaw, An experienced administrator.. " "That was the last straw.." Really Derek? Haven't heard an awful lot from you or that other Anderson stooge up to now. What happened? Singh taking all your power away to continue stealing money from the club via your dodgy agent dealings spoiled your plans? As Sonny said, Singh may be a lot of things, but stripping the club of its assets isnt one of them. His ambitions are much less sinister - small comfort that it is - but it's becoming very apparent now who the "enemy" he referred to are, and the sooner they're gone the better. With regard to the Senior players who are not happy, you are getting premiership wages to sit on your butts and to be brutally honest, you are average to downright mediocre in some cases, and if you want away in January, feel free to go. I very much doubt the big clubs are going to be hammering at the door to get most of you, but all the best and thank you for your contribution over the years is all I have to say to you. HUGHES IN.[/p][/quote]In what capacity can Shaw or Agnew make money from any transfer dealings exactly? srvp28
  • Score: 0

3:32pm Mon 31 Dec 12

A Rover 45 years and over says...

I just think this is one of the sadest situations the Club has ever been in.With all this in fighting between the main men with Shebby talking about lawers etc.They should all have the same agenda and be singhing from the same hymn sheet. Why can't they all take a step back sit down together and make sensible decisions for the benefit of the Cllub who pays their wages. One thing you can say about Shebby he is genuine in his passion for the Club and as fought the Kean institution all the way and it's a pity his judgements seem to be off course sometimes and he likes to rule his way. I don't think he will have a hidden agenda like some people may have. Therefore they must stop all this rubbish, sit down together and do their jobs for the sake of everybody..
I just think this is one of the sadest situations the Club has ever been in.With all this in fighting between the main men with Shebby talking about lawers etc.They should all have the same agenda and be singhing from the same hymn sheet. Why can't they all take a step back sit down together and make sensible decisions for the benefit of the Cllub who pays their wages. One thing you can say about Shebby he is genuine in his passion for the Club and as fought the Kean institution all the way and it's a pity his judgements seem to be off course sometimes and he likes to rule his way. I don't think he will have a hidden agenda like some people may have. Therefore they must stop all this rubbish, sit down together and do their jobs for the sake of everybody.. A Rover 45 years and over
  • Score: 0

3:38pm Mon 31 Dec 12

MerlinTheVoiceofReason2 says...

In summary, the club wasn't broken, didn't need mending but it does now. Venkys should focus on feeding chickens, admit they've "fubar'd", pick the phone up to John Williams and grovel, then hand him a pot of gold.
In summary, the club wasn't broken, didn't need mending but it does now. Venkys should focus on feeding chickens, admit they've "fubar'd", pick the phone up to John Williams and grovel, then hand him a pot of gold. MerlinTheVoiceofReason2
  • Score: 0

3:40pm Mon 31 Dec 12

To.guy says...

edmy wrote:
Read the latest from the Daily Mail We have a contagious disease at Ewood it is called the Venkys. all it touches are doomed.
"THE VENKYS" They sacked Sam, They appointed Kean, They got rid of a fantastic Board and several other prominent office staff. They presided over the removal of several senior players. They appointed Shebby. Who else is there to blame. If the don't sell soon we won't have a club worth jacks**t to sell.
Revealed: From boardroom split to player revolt, the inside story of crisis engulfing Blackburn

Senior players revolt after poor start to season
Derek Shaw wants controversial Shebby Singh out
Club no closer to naming successor to Henning Berg


Read more: http://www.dailymail

.co.uk/sport/footbal

l/article-2255191/Bl

ackburn-Rovers-crisi

s-players-revolt-She

bby-Singh
You do know Daily Mail isn't gospel don't you?
[quote][p][bold]edmy[/bold] wrote: Read the latest from the Daily Mail We have a contagious disease at Ewood it is called the Venkys. all it touches are doomed. "THE VENKYS" They sacked Sam, They appointed Kean, They got rid of a fantastic Board and several other prominent office staff. They presided over the removal of several senior players. They appointed Shebby. Who else is there to blame. If the don't sell soon we won't have a club worth jacks**t to sell. Revealed: From boardroom split to player revolt, the inside story of crisis engulfing Blackburn Senior players revolt after poor start to season Derek Shaw wants controversial Shebby Singh out Club no closer to naming successor to Henning Berg Read more: http://www.dailymail .co.uk/sport/footbal l/article-2255191/Bl ackburn-Rovers-crisi s-players-revolt-She bby-Singh[/p][/quote]You do know Daily Mail isn't gospel don't you? To.guy
  • Score: 0

3:49pm Mon 31 Dec 12

leitchy says...

How can Shaw and Agnew now work with Shebby??

Something has to give....hopefully Shebbys job...

Taxi 4 Shebby!!
How can Shaw and Agnew now work with Shebby?? Something has to give....hopefully Shebbys job... Taxi 4 Shebby!! leitchy
  • Score: 0

3:57pm Mon 31 Dec 12

garyintandem says...

sonny wrote:
More Anti-Shebby Singh propaganda from Paul Agnew & Derek Shaw doing the rounds this weekend in the tabloids, Agnew&Shaw are the really poison at BRFC any fan that does a little research(other than reading the tabloids) knows that. Singh's a nutter but his heart seems to be in the right place, Shebbys just very misguided because his so-called Colleagues have being playing him from day one(just like they have been playing the venkys from day 1 of there take-over).
at least you admit you'e a nutter shebby
[quote][p][bold]sonny[/bold] wrote: More Anti-Shebby Singh propaganda from Paul Agnew & Derek Shaw doing the rounds this weekend in the tabloids, Agnew&Shaw are the really poison at BRFC any fan that does a little research(other than reading the tabloids) knows that. Singh's a nutter but his heart seems to be in the right place, Shebbys just very misguided because his so-called Colleagues have being playing him from day one(just like they have been playing the venkys from day 1 of there take-over).[/p][/quote]at least you admit you'e a nutter shebby garyintandem
  • Score: 0

4:34pm Mon 31 Dec 12

merlinrabbit says...

leitchy wrote:
How can Shaw and Agnew now work with Shebby?? Something has to give....hopefully Shebbys job... Taxi 4 Shebby!!
You are all missing something. all three are useless, devisive, manipulative, clueless etc. it's just that Shebby demonstrates his failings openly. the other two just do it behind the scenes. You will be complaining if we fall into the power of Paul Agnew. Some fans need to be a bit more savvy about the problems down there.
[quote][p][bold]leitchy[/bold] wrote: How can Shaw and Agnew now work with Shebby?? Something has to give....hopefully Shebbys job... Taxi 4 Shebby!![/p][/quote]You are all missing something. all three are useless, devisive, manipulative, clueless etc. it's just that Shebby demonstrates his failings openly. the other two just do it behind the scenes. You will be complaining if we fall into the power of Paul Agnew. Some fans need to be a bit more savvy about the problems down there. merlinrabbit
  • Score: 0

4:38pm Mon 31 Dec 12

blueblooded says...

srvp28 wrote:
blueblooded wrote:
edmy wrote:
Read the latest from the Daily Mail We have a contagious disease at Ewood it is called the Venkys. all it touches are doomed.
"THE VENKYS" They sacked Sam, They appointed Kean, They got rid of a fantastic Board and several other prominent office staff. They presided over the removal of several senior players. They appointed Shebby. Who else is there to blame. If the don't sell soon we won't have a club worth jacks**t to sell.
Revealed: From boardroom split to player revolt, the inside story of crisis engulfing Blackburn

Senior players revolt after poor start to season
Derek Shaw wants controversial Shebby Singh out
Club no closer to naming successor to Henning Berg


Read more: http://www.dailymail



.co.uk/sport/footbal



l/article-2255191/Bl



ackburn-Rovers-crisi



s-players-revolt-She



bby-Singh
Seriously?

You call that inside story?

Every man and his dog knows senior players were not impressed with Berg's appointment and the Daily Fail's exclusive already tells you who spun THAT leak.

"Shaw, An experienced administrator.. "

"That was the last straw.." Really Derek? Haven't heard an awful lot from you or that other Anderson stooge up to now. What happened? Singh taking all your power away to continue stealing money from the club via your dodgy agent dealings spoiled your plans?

As Sonny said, Singh may be a lot of things, but stripping the club of its assets isnt one of them. His ambitions are much less sinister - small comfort that it is - but it's becoming very apparent now who the "enemy" he referred to are, and the sooner they're gone the better.

With regard to the Senior players who are not happy, you are getting premiership wages to sit on your butts and to be brutally honest, you are average to downright mediocre in some cases, and if you want away in January, feel free to go. I very much doubt the big clubs are going to be hammering at the door to get most of you, but all the best and thank you for your contribution over the years is all I have to say to you.

HUGHES IN.
In what capacity can Shaw or Agnew make money from any transfer dealings exactly?
You've never heard of a kickback? :/
[quote][p][bold]srvp28[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]blueblooded[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]edmy[/bold] wrote: Read the latest from the Daily Mail We have a contagious disease at Ewood it is called the Venkys. all it touches are doomed. "THE VENKYS" They sacked Sam, They appointed Kean, They got rid of a fantastic Board and several other prominent office staff. They presided over the removal of several senior players. They appointed Shebby. Who else is there to blame. If the don't sell soon we won't have a club worth jacks**t to sell. Revealed: From boardroom split to player revolt, the inside story of crisis engulfing Blackburn Senior players revolt after poor start to season Derek Shaw wants controversial Shebby Singh out Club no closer to naming successor to Henning Berg Read more: http://www.dailymail .co.uk/sport/footbal l/article-2255191/Bl ackburn-Rovers-crisi s-players-revolt-She bby-Singh[/p][/quote]Seriously? You call that inside story? Every man and his dog knows senior players were not impressed with Berg's appointment and the Daily Fail's exclusive already tells you who spun THAT leak. "Shaw, An experienced administrator.. " "That was the last straw.." Really Derek? Haven't heard an awful lot from you or that other Anderson stooge up to now. What happened? Singh taking all your power away to continue stealing money from the club via your dodgy agent dealings spoiled your plans? As Sonny said, Singh may be a lot of things, but stripping the club of its assets isnt one of them. His ambitions are much less sinister - small comfort that it is - but it's becoming very apparent now who the "enemy" he referred to are, and the sooner they're gone the better. With regard to the Senior players who are not happy, you are getting premiership wages to sit on your butts and to be brutally honest, you are average to downright mediocre in some cases, and if you want away in January, feel free to go. I very much doubt the big clubs are going to be hammering at the door to get most of you, but all the best and thank you for your contribution over the years is all I have to say to you. HUGHES IN.[/p][/quote]In what capacity can Shaw or Agnew make money from any transfer dealings exactly?[/p][/quote]You've never heard of a kickback? :/ blueblooded
  • Score: 0

4:42pm Mon 31 Dec 12

CARover says...

Singh, your advice has got this club nowhere so stick it where the sun does not shine, your experience in football is so thin you are see through….except for in India……resign now and let someone with real football knowledge do the job....go now
Singh, your advice has got this club nowhere so stick it where the sun does not shine, your experience in football is so thin you are see through….except for in India……resign now and let someone with real football knowledge do the job....go now CARover
  • Score: 0

5:05pm Mon 31 Dec 12

Dublin rover says...

so new years day we find out who the new boss is ?.is that in the morning or or 2014 hehe. but as i said in other posts all 3 must go. they must get on there knees and ask john willams and tony parks to come back. then we would get a good manager.i have got a feeling the venkys look at theses pages. so do the right thing venkys sell up or get john and tony in who love the club and know how to run it .And to all my fellow rovers fans
have a happy new
so new years day we find out who the new boss is ?.is that in the morning or or 2014 hehe. but as i said in other posts all 3 must go. they must get on there knees and ask john willams and tony parks to come back. then we would get a good manager.i have got a feeling the venkys look at theses pages. so do the right thing venkys sell up or get john and tony in who love the club and know how to run it .And to all my fellow rovers fans have a happy new Dublin rover
  • Score: 0

5:05pm Mon 31 Dec 12

leitchy says...

merlinrabbit wrote:
leitchy wrote:
How can Shaw and Agnew now work with Shebby?? Something has to give....hopefully Shebbys job... Taxi 4 Shebby!!
You are all missing something. all three are useless, devisive, manipulative, clueless etc. it's just that Shebby demonstrates his failings openly. the other two just do it behind the scenes. You will be complaining if we fall into the power of Paul Agnew. Some fans need to be a bit more savvy about the problems down there.
Maybe true...but I'm going off the likely thing to happen...Venkys will not sack all 3 of them so in my opinion I would rather Shebby leave then any1 else.

Hughes in..!
[quote][p][bold]merlinrabbit[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]leitchy[/bold] wrote: How can Shaw and Agnew now work with Shebby?? Something has to give....hopefully Shebbys job... Taxi 4 Shebby!![/p][/quote]You are all missing something. all three are useless, devisive, manipulative, clueless etc. it's just that Shebby demonstrates his failings openly. the other two just do it behind the scenes. You will be complaining if we fall into the power of Paul Agnew. Some fans need to be a bit more savvy about the problems down there.[/p][/quote]Maybe true...but I'm going off the likely thing to happen...Venkys will not sack all 3 of them so in my opinion I would rather Shebby leave then any1 else. Hughes in..! leitchy
  • Score: 0

5:06pm Mon 31 Dec 12

peely says...

srvp28 wrote:
blueblooded wrote:
edmy wrote:
Read the latest from the Daily Mail We have a contagious disease at Ewood it is called the Venkys. all it touches are doomed.
"THE VENKYS" They sacked Sam, They appointed Kean, They got rid of a fantastic Board and several other prominent office staff. They presided over the removal of several senior players. They appointed Shebby. Who else is there to blame. If the don't sell soon we won't have a club worth jacks**t to sell.
Revealed: From boardroom split to player revolt, the inside story of crisis engulfing Blackburn

Senior players revolt after poor start to season
Derek Shaw wants controversial Shebby Singh out
Club no closer to naming successor to Henning Berg


Read more: http://www.dailymail



.co.uk/sport/footbal



l/article-2255191/Bl



ackburn-Rovers-crisi



s-players-revolt-She



bby-Singh
Seriously?

You call that inside story?

Every man and his dog knows senior players were not impressed with Berg's appointment and the Daily Fail's exclusive already tells you who spun THAT leak.

"Shaw, An experienced administrator.. "

"That was the last straw.." Really Derek? Haven't heard an awful lot from you or that other Anderson stooge up to now. What happened? Singh taking all your power away to continue stealing money from the club via your dodgy agent dealings spoiled your plans?

As Sonny said, Singh may be a lot of things, but stripping the club of its assets isnt one of them. His ambitions are much less sinister - small comfort that it is - but it's becoming very apparent now who the "enemy" he referred to are, and the sooner they're gone the better.

With regard to the Senior players who are not happy, you are getting premiership wages to sit on your butts and to be brutally honest, you are average to downright mediocre in some cases, and if you want away in January, feel free to go. I very much doubt the big clubs are going to be hammering at the door to get most of you, but all the best and thank you for your contribution over the years is all I have to say to you.

HUGHES IN.
In what capacity can Shaw or Agnew make money from any transfer dealings exactly?
"In what capacity can Shaw or Agnew make any money from transfer dealings ". Oh. Per lease , come on - do we really need to spell it out how this agent / club employee bung works ! The whole scenario stinks from top to bottom , it's now just a case of who can make the most before the ship goes t"st up ! And the mug paying fans left in the lurch while greedy players/ agents /senior management move on to pastures new with their pockets filled not to mention foreign bank accounts!
[quote][p][bold]srvp28[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]blueblooded[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]edmy[/bold] wrote: Read the latest from the Daily Mail We have a contagious disease at Ewood it is called the Venkys. all it touches are doomed. "THE VENKYS" They sacked Sam, They appointed Kean, They got rid of a fantastic Board and several other prominent office staff. They presided over the removal of several senior players. They appointed Shebby. Who else is there to blame. If the don't sell soon we won't have a club worth jacks**t to sell. Revealed: From boardroom split to player revolt, the inside story of crisis engulfing Blackburn Senior players revolt after poor start to season Derek Shaw wants controversial Shebby Singh out Club no closer to naming successor to Henning Berg Read more: http://www.dailymail .co.uk/sport/footbal l/article-2255191/Bl ackburn-Rovers-crisi s-players-revolt-She bby-Singh[/p][/quote]Seriously? You call that inside story? Every man and his dog knows senior players were not impressed with Berg's appointment and the Daily Fail's exclusive already tells you who spun THAT leak. "Shaw, An experienced administrator.. " "That was the last straw.." Really Derek? Haven't heard an awful lot from you or that other Anderson stooge up to now. What happened? Singh taking all your power away to continue stealing money from the club via your dodgy agent dealings spoiled your plans? As Sonny said, Singh may be a lot of things, but stripping the club of its assets isnt one of them. His ambitions are much less sinister - small comfort that it is - but it's becoming very apparent now who the "enemy" he referred to are, and the sooner they're gone the better. With regard to the Senior players who are not happy, you are getting premiership wages to sit on your butts and to be brutally honest, you are average to downright mediocre in some cases, and if you want away in January, feel free to go. I very much doubt the big clubs are going to be hammering at the door to get most of you, but all the best and thank you for your contribution over the years is all I have to say to you. HUGHES IN.[/p][/quote]In what capacity can Shaw or Agnew make money from any transfer dealings exactly?[/p][/quote]"In what capacity can Shaw or Agnew make any money from transfer dealings ". Oh. Per lease , come on - do we really need to spell it out how this agent / club employee bung works ! The whole scenario stinks from top to bottom , it's now just a case of who can make the most before the ship goes t"st up ! And the mug paying fans left in the lurch while greedy players/ agents /senior management move on to pastures new with their pockets filled not to mention foreign bank accounts! peely
  • Score: 0

5:10pm Mon 31 Dec 12

edmy says...

leitchy wrote:
How can Shaw and Agnew now work with Shebby?? Something has to give....hopefully Shebbys job... Taxi 4 Shebby!!
I do know that the Daily Mail is not gospel (contrary to your sarcasm) merely pointing anyone that is interested to another viewpoint.
[quote][p][bold]leitchy[/bold] wrote: How can Shaw and Agnew now work with Shebby?? Something has to give....hopefully Shebbys job... Taxi 4 Shebby!![/p][/quote]I do know that the Daily Mail is not gospel (contrary to your sarcasm) merely pointing anyone that is interested to another viewpoint. edmy
  • Score: 0

5:12pm Mon 31 Dec 12

blueblooded says...

lancs1985 wrote:
lancs1985 wrote:
A club full of 1st class idiots
Shaw trashed Preston
Shebby doesn't no his arse from elbow
And Agnew well well
Keans little bum licker, changing job titles, making senior staff jobs untenable ie John newsham,

Get the whole sherbang down the m65 to dingle land

Rovers will be same or build again till these 3pillocks are gone!!!!!

RIP BRFC
Will never be the same again
Change is part of life. Not all change is good, but one must adapt to the change or get left behind. In Rovers case, sitting there reminiscing about the good old days is all that's left for those who cannot accept that things will never be the same again. For these people I heartily recommend finding another interest and moving on with your life as its not going to get any better for you.

For everyone else, we know what we need, as long as we get the right person, we can still have a club to build on and get behind. Venky's arent going anywhere in the short term, and what they would leave behind wouldn't be anything that would resemble a club competing in league football, People keep assuming we've hit rock bottom, It might feel that way from where we were, but it certainly isn't in jumping distance to how far we could fall should the unthinkable ever happen.

We need an experienced manager and we need the full force of the real fans to get behind him and whatever team we are left with this next year.
[quote][p][bold]lancs1985[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]lancs1985[/bold] wrote: A club full of 1st class idiots Shaw trashed Preston Shebby doesn't no his arse from elbow And Agnew well well Keans little bum licker, changing job titles, making senior staff jobs untenable ie John newsham, Get the whole sherbang down the m65 to dingle land Rovers will be same or build again till these 3pillocks are gone!!!!! RIP BRFC[/p][/quote]Will never be the same again[/p][/quote]Change is part of life. Not all change is good, but one must adapt to the change or get left behind. In Rovers case, sitting there reminiscing about the good old days is all that's left for those who cannot accept that things will never be the same again. For these people I heartily recommend finding another interest and moving on with your life as its not going to get any better for you. For everyone else, we know what we need, as long as we get the right person, we can still have a club to build on and get behind. Venky's arent going anywhere in the short term, and what they would leave behind wouldn't be anything that would resemble a club competing in league football, People keep assuming we've hit rock bottom, It might feel that way from where we were, but it certainly isn't in jumping distance to how far we could fall should the unthinkable ever happen. We need an experienced manager and we need the full force of the real fans to get behind him and whatever team we are left with this next year. blueblooded
  • Score: 0

5:12pm Mon 31 Dec 12

edmy says...

edmy wrote:
leitchy wrote: How can Shaw and Agnew now work with Shebby?? Something has to give....hopefully Shebbys job... Taxi 4 Shebby!!
I do know that the Daily Mail is not gospel (contrary to your sarcasm) merely pointing anyone that is interested to another viewpoint.
posted on wrong comment sorry
[quote][p][bold]edmy[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]leitchy[/bold] wrote: How can Shaw and Agnew now work with Shebby?? Something has to give....hopefully Shebbys job... Taxi 4 Shebby!![/p][/quote]I do know that the Daily Mail is not gospel (contrary to your sarcasm) merely pointing anyone that is interested to another viewpoint.[/p][/quote]posted on wrong comment sorry edmy
  • Score: 0

5:13pm Mon 31 Dec 12

edmy says...

To.guy wrote:
edmy wrote: Read the latest from the Daily Mail We have a contagious disease at Ewood it is called the Venkys. all it touches are doomed. "THE VENKYS" They sacked Sam, They appointed Kean, They got rid of a fantastic Board and several other prominent office staff. They presided over the removal of several senior players. They appointed Shebby. Who else is there to blame. If the don't sell soon we won't have a club worth jacks**t to sell. Revealed: From boardroom split to player revolt, the inside story of crisis engulfing Blackburn Senior players revolt after poor start to season Derek Shaw wants controversial Shebby Singh out Club no closer to naming successor to Henning Berg Read more: http://www.dailymail .co.uk/sport/footbal l/article-2255191/Bl ackburn-Rovers-crisi s-players-revolt-She bby-Singh
You do know Daily Mail isn't gospel don't you?
I do know that the Daily Mail is not gospel (contrary to your sarcasm) merely pointing anyone that is interested to another viewpoint.
[quote][p][bold]To.guy[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]edmy[/bold] wrote: Read the latest from the Daily Mail We have a contagious disease at Ewood it is called the Venkys. all it touches are doomed. "THE VENKYS" They sacked Sam, They appointed Kean, They got rid of a fantastic Board and several other prominent office staff. They presided over the removal of several senior players. They appointed Shebby. Who else is there to blame. If the don't sell soon we won't have a club worth jacks**t to sell. Revealed: From boardroom split to player revolt, the inside story of crisis engulfing Blackburn Senior players revolt after poor start to season Derek Shaw wants controversial Shebby Singh out Club no closer to naming successor to Henning Berg Read more: http://www.dailymail .co.uk/sport/footbal l/article-2255191/Bl ackburn-Rovers-crisi s-players-revolt-She bby-Singh[/p][/quote]You do know Daily Mail isn't gospel don't you?[/p][/quote]I do know that the Daily Mail is not gospel (contrary to your sarcasm) merely pointing anyone that is interested to another viewpoint. edmy
  • Score: 0

5:25pm Mon 31 Dec 12

srvp28 says...

blueblooded wrote:
srvp28 wrote:
blueblooded wrote:
edmy wrote:
Read the latest from the Daily Mail We have a contagious disease at Ewood it is called the Venkys. all it touches are doomed.
"THE VENKYS" They sacked Sam, They appointed Kean, They got rid of a fantastic Board and several other prominent office staff. They presided over the removal of several senior players. They appointed Shebby. Who else is there to blame. If the don't sell soon we won't have a club worth jacks**t to sell.
Revealed: From boardroom split to player revolt, the inside story of crisis engulfing Blackburn

Senior players revolt after poor start to season
Derek Shaw wants controversial Shebby Singh out
Club no closer to naming successor to Henning Berg


Read more: http://www.dailymail




.co.uk/sport/footbal




l/article-2255191/Bl




ackburn-Rovers-crisi




s-players-revolt-She




bby-Singh
Seriously?

You call that inside story?

Every man and his dog knows senior players were not impressed with Berg's appointment and the Daily Fail's exclusive already tells you who spun THAT leak.

"Shaw, An experienced administrator.. "

"That was the last straw.." Really Derek? Haven't heard an awful lot from you or that other Anderson stooge up to now. What happened? Singh taking all your power away to continue stealing money from the club via your dodgy agent dealings spoiled your plans?

As Sonny said, Singh may be a lot of things, but stripping the club of its assets isnt one of them. His ambitions are much less sinister - small comfort that it is - but it's becoming very apparent now who the "enemy" he referred to are, and the sooner they're gone the better.

With regard to the Senior players who are not happy, you are getting premiership wages to sit on your butts and to be brutally honest, you are average to downright mediocre in some cases, and if you want away in January, feel free to go. I very much doubt the big clubs are going to be hammering at the door to get most of you, but all the best and thank you for your contribution over the years is all I have to say to you.

HUGHES IN.
In what capacity can Shaw or Agnew make money from any transfer dealings exactly?
You've never heard of a kickback? :/
Yesterday you asked me if I had any proof/evidence to back-up my OPINIONS, accused fellow fans of stirring up hatred and scoffed at them for believing everything the papers print. Yet, here you are saying that Shaw and Agnew are getting kick-backs from player transfers.

Hmmm, I'm sure you know what's coming next but I'll ask you anyway: do you have any proof or evidence to substantiate your claims?
[quote][p][bold]blueblooded[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]srvp28[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]blueblooded[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]edmy[/bold] wrote: Read the latest from the Daily Mail We have a contagious disease at Ewood it is called the Venkys. all it touches are doomed. "THE VENKYS" They sacked Sam, They appointed Kean, They got rid of a fantastic Board and several other prominent office staff. They presided over the removal of several senior players. They appointed Shebby. Who else is there to blame. If the don't sell soon we won't have a club worth jacks**t to sell. Revealed: From boardroom split to player revolt, the inside story of crisis engulfing Blackburn Senior players revolt after poor start to season Derek Shaw wants controversial Shebby Singh out Club no closer to naming successor to Henning Berg Read more: http://www.dailymail .co.uk/sport/footbal l/article-2255191/Bl ackburn-Rovers-crisi s-players-revolt-She bby-Singh[/p][/quote]Seriously? You call that inside story? Every man and his dog knows senior players were not impressed with Berg's appointment and the Daily Fail's exclusive already tells you who spun THAT leak. "Shaw, An experienced administrator.. " "That was the last straw.." Really Derek? Haven't heard an awful lot from you or that other Anderson stooge up to now. What happened? Singh taking all your power away to continue stealing money from the club via your dodgy agent dealings spoiled your plans? As Sonny said, Singh may be a lot of things, but stripping the club of its assets isnt one of them. His ambitions are much less sinister - small comfort that it is - but it's becoming very apparent now who the "enemy" he referred to are, and the sooner they're gone the better. With regard to the Senior players who are not happy, you are getting premiership wages to sit on your butts and to be brutally honest, you are average to downright mediocre in some cases, and if you want away in January, feel free to go. I very much doubt the big clubs are going to be hammering at the door to get most of you, but all the best and thank you for your contribution over the years is all I have to say to you. HUGHES IN.[/p][/quote]In what capacity can Shaw or Agnew make money from any transfer dealings exactly?[/p][/quote]You've never heard of a kickback? :/[/p][/quote]Yesterday you asked me if I had any proof/evidence to back-up my OPINIONS, accused fellow fans of stirring up hatred and scoffed at them for believing everything the papers print. Yet, here you are saying that Shaw and Agnew are getting kick-backs from player transfers. Hmmm, I'm sure you know what's coming next but I'll ask you anyway: do you have any proof or evidence to substantiate your claims? srvp28
  • Score: 0

5:30pm Mon 31 Dec 12

Dan11 says...

Dublin rover wrote:
so new years day we find out who the new boss is ?.is that in the morning or or 2014 hehe. but as i said in other posts all 3 must go. they must get on there knees and ask john willams and tony parks to come back. then we would get a good manager.i have got a feeling the venkys look at theses pages. so do the right thing venkys sell up or get john and tony in who love the club and know how to run it .And to all my fellow rovers fans
have a happy new
New Years day. I will not be holding my breath expecting an announcement for sure. DESAI will probably want to meet their wives first for a cup of tea before making a decision.
[quote][p][bold]Dublin rover[/bold] wrote: so new years day we find out who the new boss is ?.is that in the morning or or 2014 hehe. but as i said in other posts all 3 must go. they must get on there knees and ask john willams and tony parks to come back. then we would get a good manager.i have got a feeling the venkys look at theses pages. so do the right thing venkys sell up or get john and tony in who love the club and know how to run it .And to all my fellow rovers fans have a happy new[/p][/quote]New Years day. I will not be holding my breath expecting an announcement for sure. DESAI will probably want to meet their wives first for a cup of tea before making a decision. Dan11
  • Score: 0

5:43pm Mon 31 Dec 12

srvp28 says...

peely wrote:
srvp28 wrote:
blueblooded wrote:
edmy wrote:
Read the latest from the Daily Mail We have a contagious disease at Ewood it is called the Venkys. all it touches are doomed.
"THE VENKYS" They sacked Sam, They appointed Kean, They got rid of a fantastic Board and several other prominent office staff. They presided over the removal of several senior players. They appointed Shebby. Who else is there to blame. If the don't sell soon we won't have a club worth jacks**t to sell.
Revealed: From boardroom split to player revolt, the inside story of crisis engulfing Blackburn

Senior players revolt after poor start to season
Derek Shaw wants controversial Shebby Singh out
Club no closer to naming successor to Henning Berg


Read more: http://www.dailymail




.co.uk/sport/footbal




l/article-2255191/Bl




ackburn-Rovers-crisi




s-players-revolt-She




bby-Singh
Seriously?

You call that inside story?

Every man and his dog knows senior players were not impressed with Berg's appointment and the Daily Fail's exclusive already tells you who spun THAT leak.

"Shaw, An experienced administrator.. "

"That was the last straw.." Really Derek? Haven't heard an awful lot from you or that other Anderson stooge up to now. What happened? Singh taking all your power away to continue stealing money from the club via your dodgy agent dealings spoiled your plans?

As Sonny said, Singh may be a lot of things, but stripping the club of its assets isnt one of them. His ambitions are much less sinister - small comfort that it is - but it's becoming very apparent now who the "enemy" he referred to are, and the sooner they're gone the better.

With regard to the Senior players who are not happy, you are getting premiership wages to sit on your butts and to be brutally honest, you are average to downright mediocre in some cases, and if you want away in January, feel free to go. I very much doubt the big clubs are going to be hammering at the door to get most of you, but all the best and thank you for your contribution over the years is all I have to say to you.

HUGHES IN.
In what capacity can Shaw or Agnew make money from any transfer dealings exactly?
"In what capacity can Shaw or Agnew make any money from transfer dealings ". Oh. Per lease , come on - do we really need to spell it out how this agent / club employee bung works ! The whole scenario stinks from top to bottom , it's now just a case of who can make the most before the ship goes t"st up ! And the mug paying fans left in the lurch while greedy players/ agents /senior management move on to pastures new with their pockets filled not to mention foreign bank accounts!
Don't talk to me like I'm a simpleton, I'm well aware of the amount of corruption in some sports. However, seeing as you have no proof of this I don't think you should be making those accusations. Just because you don't like someone it doesn't mean they're on the take.

It's almost as ridiculous as those people saying that Hendry is only being kept on because he owes money to someone from the Walker Trust. This is the same Walker Trust, I assume, who sold the club to Venky's over two years ago, long before Hendry was hired?

There's far too many people on here who want to believe that the club is rotten to the core just because they don't like the initial influence Jerome Anderson had at the club. These same people will try to convince you that he still has some influence, despite Venky's saying he doesn't.
[quote][p][bold]peely[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]srvp28[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]blueblooded[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]edmy[/bold] wrote: Read the latest from the Daily Mail We have a contagious disease at Ewood it is called the Venkys. all it touches are doomed. "THE VENKYS" They sacked Sam, They appointed Kean, They got rid of a fantastic Board and several other prominent office staff. They presided over the removal of several senior players. They appointed Shebby. Who else is there to blame. If the don't sell soon we won't have a club worth jacks**t to sell. Revealed: From boardroom split to player revolt, the inside story of crisis engulfing Blackburn Senior players revolt after poor start to season Derek Shaw wants controversial Shebby Singh out Club no closer to naming successor to Henning Berg Read more: http://www.dailymail .co.uk/sport/footbal l/article-2255191/Bl ackburn-Rovers-crisi s-players-revolt-She bby-Singh[/p][/quote]Seriously? You call that inside story? Every man and his dog knows senior players were not impressed with Berg's appointment and the Daily Fail's exclusive already tells you who spun THAT leak. "Shaw, An experienced administrator.. " "That was the last straw.." Really Derek? Haven't heard an awful lot from you or that other Anderson stooge up to now. What happened? Singh taking all your power away to continue stealing money from the club via your dodgy agent dealings spoiled your plans? As Sonny said, Singh may be a lot of things, but stripping the club of its assets isnt one of them. His ambitions are much less sinister - small comfort that it is - but it's becoming very apparent now who the "enemy" he referred to are, and the sooner they're gone the better. With regard to the Senior players who are not happy, you are getting premiership wages to sit on your butts and to be brutally honest, you are average to downright mediocre in some cases, and if you want away in January, feel free to go. I very much doubt the big clubs are going to be hammering at the door to get most of you, but all the best and thank you for your contribution over the years is all I have to say to you. HUGHES IN.[/p][/quote]In what capacity can Shaw or Agnew make money from any transfer dealings exactly?[/p][/quote]"In what capacity can Shaw or Agnew make any money from transfer dealings ". Oh. Per lease , come on - do we really need to spell it out how this agent / club employee bung works ! The whole scenario stinks from top to bottom , it's now just a case of who can make the most before the ship goes t"st up ! And the mug paying fans left in the lurch while greedy players/ agents /senior management move on to pastures new with their pockets filled not to mention foreign bank accounts![/p][/quote]Don't talk to me like I'm a simpleton, I'm well aware of the amount of corruption in some sports. However, seeing as you have no proof of this I don't think you should be making those accusations. Just because you don't like someone it doesn't mean they're on the take. It's almost as ridiculous as those people saying that Hendry is only being kept on because he owes money to someone from the Walker Trust. This is the same Walker Trust, I assume, who sold the club to Venky's over two years ago, long before Hendry was hired? There's far too many people on here who want to believe that the club is rotten to the core just because they don't like the initial influence Jerome Anderson had at the club. These same people will try to convince you that he still has some influence, despite Venky's saying he doesn't. srvp28
  • Score: 0

5:45pm Mon 31 Dec 12

blueblooded says...

srvp28 wrote:
blueblooded wrote:
srvp28 wrote:
blueblooded wrote:
edmy wrote:
Read the latest from the Daily Mail We have a contagious disease at Ewood it is called the Venkys. all it touches are doomed.
"THE VENKYS" They sacked Sam, They appointed Kean, They got rid of a fantastic Board and several other prominent office staff. They presided over the removal of several senior players. They appointed Shebby. Who else is there to blame. If the don't sell soon we won't have a club worth jacks**t to sell.
Revealed: From boardroom split to player revolt, the inside story of crisis engulfing Blackburn

Senior players revolt after poor start to season
Derek Shaw wants controversial Shebby Singh out
Club no closer to naming successor to Henning Berg


Read more: http://www.dailymail





.co.uk/sport/footbal





l/article-2255191/Bl





ackburn-Rovers-crisi





s-players-revolt-She





bby-Singh
Seriously?

You call that inside story?

Every man and his dog knows senior players were not impressed with Berg's appointment and the Daily Fail's exclusive already tells you who spun THAT leak.

"Shaw, An experienced administrator.. "

"That was the last straw.." Really Derek? Haven't heard an awful lot from you or that other Anderson stooge up to now. What happened? Singh taking all your power away to continue stealing money from the club via your dodgy agent dealings spoiled your plans?

As Sonny said, Singh may be a lot of things, but stripping the club of its assets isnt one of them. His ambitions are much less sinister - small comfort that it is - but it's becoming very apparent now who the "enemy" he referred to are, and the sooner they're gone the better.

With regard to the Senior players who are not happy, you are getting premiership wages to sit on your butts and to be brutally honest, you are average to downright mediocre in some cases, and if you want away in January, feel free to go. I very much doubt the big clubs are going to be hammering at the door to get most of you, but all the best and thank you for your contribution over the years is all I have to say to you.

HUGHES IN.
In what capacity can Shaw or Agnew make money from any transfer dealings exactly?
You've never heard of a kickback? :/
Yesterday you asked me if I had any proof/evidence to back-up my OPINIONS, accused fellow fans of stirring up hatred and scoffed at them for believing everything the papers print. Yet, here you are saying that Shaw and Agnew are getting kick-backs from player transfers.

Hmmm, I'm sure you know what's coming next but I'll ask you anyway: do you have any proof or evidence to substantiate your claims?
I'm not saying they are. I asked a question. A valid one, since its all everyone has said about the set up after Kean was installed and players sold off and cheapos brought in. Its not exactly a breaking story or news that fans have questioned agents involvement .. or did you miss that?
[quote][p][bold]srvp28[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]blueblooded[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]srvp28[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]blueblooded[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]edmy[/bold] wrote: Read the latest from the Daily Mail We have a contagious disease at Ewood it is called the Venkys. all it touches are doomed. "THE VENKYS" They sacked Sam, They appointed Kean, They got rid of a fantastic Board and several other prominent office staff. They presided over the removal of several senior players. They appointed Shebby. Who else is there to blame. If the don't sell soon we won't have a club worth jacks**t to sell. Revealed: From boardroom split to player revolt, the inside story of crisis engulfing Blackburn Senior players revolt after poor start to season Derek Shaw wants controversial Shebby Singh out Club no closer to naming successor to Henning Berg Read more: http://www.dailymail .co.uk/sport/footbal l/article-2255191/Bl ackburn-Rovers-crisi s-players-revolt-She bby-Singh[/p][/quote]Seriously? You call that inside story? Every man and his dog knows senior players were not impressed with Berg's appointment and the Daily Fail's exclusive already tells you who spun THAT leak. "Shaw, An experienced administrator.. " "That was the last straw.." Really Derek? Haven't heard an awful lot from you or that other Anderson stooge up to now. What happened? Singh taking all your power away to continue stealing money from the club via your dodgy agent dealings spoiled your plans? As Sonny said, Singh may be a lot of things, but stripping the club of its assets isnt one of them. His ambitions are much less sinister - small comfort that it is - but it's becoming very apparent now who the "enemy" he referred to are, and the sooner they're gone the better. With regard to the Senior players who are not happy, you are getting premiership wages to sit on your butts and to be brutally honest, you are average to downright mediocre in some cases, and if you want away in January, feel free to go. I very much doubt the big clubs are going to be hammering at the door to get most of you, but all the best and thank you for your contribution over the years is all I have to say to you. HUGHES IN.[/p][/quote]In what capacity can Shaw or Agnew make money from any transfer dealings exactly?[/p][/quote]You've never heard of a kickback? :/[/p][/quote]Yesterday you asked me if I had any proof/evidence to back-up my OPINIONS, accused fellow fans of stirring up hatred and scoffed at them for believing everything the papers print. Yet, here you are saying that Shaw and Agnew are getting kick-backs from player transfers. Hmmm, I'm sure you know what's coming next but I'll ask you anyway: do you have any proof or evidence to substantiate your claims?[/p][/quote]I'm not saying they are. I asked a question. A valid one, since its all everyone has said about the set up after Kean was installed and players sold off and cheapos brought in. Its not exactly a breaking story or news that fans have questioned agents involvement .. or did you miss that? blueblooded
  • Score: 0

6:00pm Mon 31 Dec 12

Stone Island: says...

Darwener living in Canada wrote:
Rover Pete wrote:
Has anybody a clue as to what Venky's are trying to do with Rovers?
They have not done one single thing right. How on earth did this shower end up so called millionaires? It must be very easy to make money in India. The farce still goes on. Singh is obviously crazy and totally out of his depth but Venky's still trust him and think he can walk on water.
We are going down to League 1 - no question. But why, oh why, are Venky's so happy to see it happen? There is nothing in it for them, is there?
Now it looks as though Givet, Pederson, Dunn and Robinson are going to be sold in January. Another bad move and a downwards step. Do Venky's know or care how stupid they have made themselves and the few supporters (myself included!) that are still left going to matches?
Rovers will not be relegated to League 1 as you stated, even I know there are more than 3 teams more dire than us at the moment. As for the players you mentioned leaving in January so what? They are too slow/old and not fit enough for this league and I would add a few more players to your list. They have been good servants but needs must and teams need fast paced players in this league with zero time on the ball.
There were three worse teams than us in the PL last season. Then we went and lost EIGHT of our last nine games.

I wouldn't rule anything out, with IDIOTS like Shabby Minge calling the shots.
[quote][p][bold]Darwener living in Canada[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Rover Pete[/bold] wrote: Has anybody a clue as to what Venky's are trying to do with Rovers? They have not done one single thing right. How on earth did this shower end up so called millionaires? It must be very easy to make money in India. The farce still goes on. Singh is obviously crazy and totally out of his depth but Venky's still trust him and think he can walk on water. We are going down to League 1 - no question. But why, oh why, are Venky's so happy to see it happen? There is nothing in it for them, is there? Now it looks as though Givet, Pederson, Dunn and Robinson are going to be sold in January. Another bad move and a downwards step. Do Venky's know or care how stupid they have made themselves and the few supporters (myself included!) that are still left going to matches?[/p][/quote]Rovers will not be relegated to League 1 as you stated, even I know there are more than 3 teams more dire than us at the moment. As for the players you mentioned leaving in January so what? They are too slow/old and not fit enough for this league and I would add a few more players to your list. They have been good servants but needs must and teams need fast paced players in this league with zero time on the ball.[/p][/quote]There were three worse teams than us in the PL last season. Then we went and lost EIGHT of our last nine games. I wouldn't rule anything out, with IDIOTS like Shabby Minge calling the shots. Stone Island:
  • Score: 0

6:11pm Mon 31 Dec 12

RoverInRotterdam says...

It seems pretty obvious that the 'leaks' to the media are eminating from quite a few sources at the club ,all of the using it for their own agenda, and NONE with the interests of the club in mind. The only chance we have of surviving this continuing destruction is for there to be a complete clearout,all the way from Hendry way up to Coar,then for our 'out of their depth' owners to finally admit that they have no idea what they are doing,and to contact J.W, ( or someone of his standing,not connected to a certain agency in any way ) with regards to him being given a free rein and financial backing to use his experience and vast contacts to bring in his own team and begin the re-construction of our once proud and respected Football Club. If the owners,as i fully expect,are not prepared to do this, they should immediately turn the Club over to the Blackburn Trust( i forget the proper title - sorry) for whatever sum they can raise. The last 3 years have cost the venkys NOTHING, but has given the sort of worldwide coverage of their brand that would have cost them millions up on millions normally,because although they have made our Club the laughing stock of the football world, there has surely been no damage regarding their chicken buisinesses, just worldwide recognition . If the venkys have any honour,self respect or decency whatsoever , they should do the right thing or GO !!! R.T.I.D. Since 1969
It seems pretty obvious that the 'leaks' to the media are eminating from quite a few sources at the club ,all of the using it for their own agenda, and NONE with the interests of the club in mind. The only chance we have of surviving this continuing destruction is for there to be a complete clearout,all the way from Hendry way up to Coar,then for our 'out of their depth' owners to finally admit that they have no idea what they are doing,and to contact J.W, ( or someone of his standing,not connected to a certain agency in any way ) with regards to him being given a free rein and financial backing to use his experience and vast contacts to bring in his own team and begin the re-construction of our once proud and respected Football Club. If the owners,as i fully expect,are not prepared to do this, they should immediately turn the Club over to the Blackburn Trust( i forget the proper title - sorry) for whatever sum they can raise. The last 3 years have cost the venkys NOTHING, but has given the sort of worldwide coverage of their brand that would have cost them millions up on millions normally,because although they have made our Club the laughing stock of the football world, there has surely been no damage regarding their chicken buisinesses, just worldwide recognition . If the venkys have any honour,self respect or decency whatsoever , they should do the right thing or GO !!! R.T.I.D. Since 1969 RoverInRotterdam
  • Score: 0

6:17pm Mon 31 Dec 12

blueblooded says...

Regardless of whether these individuals are still involved with the aforementioned agent or not, one thing is for sure. They have presided over one of the most disastrous period in our clubs history and watched it tumble to where into relegation.

I ask again, why are they now asking for Singh's removal having communicated zilch to the fans and contributed even less to its success?

Why are the articles in the rag trade showing them as having had enough of Singh, when Kean's disastrous tenure seemed not to bother them enough to warrant demanding his removal?

The "experienced administrator" that is Shaw seemingly, why have we lost our best players and resources and replaced with unknowns and over-the -hill has beens? I don't recall hearing them throwing a tantrum at those ridiculous decisions.
Regardless of whether these individuals are still involved with the aforementioned agent or not, one thing is for sure. They have presided over one of the most disastrous period in our clubs history and watched it tumble to where into relegation. I ask again, why are they now asking for Singh's removal having communicated zilch to the fans and contributed even less to its success? Why are the articles in the rag trade showing them as having had enough of Singh, when Kean's disastrous tenure seemed not to bother them enough to warrant demanding his removal? The "experienced administrator" that is Shaw seemingly, why have we lost our best players and resources and replaced with unknowns and over-the -hill has beens? I don't recall hearing them throwing a tantrum at those ridiculous decisions. blueblooded
  • Score: 0

6:44pm Mon 31 Dec 12

srvp28 says...

blueblooded wrote:
srvp28 wrote:
blueblooded wrote:
srvp28 wrote:
blueblooded wrote:
edmy wrote:
Read the latest from the Daily Mail We have a contagious disease at Ewood it is called the Venkys. all it touches are doomed.
"THE VENKYS" They sacked Sam, They appointed Kean, They got rid of a fantastic Board and several other prominent office staff. They presided over the removal of several senior players. They appointed Shebby. Who else is there to blame. If the don't sell soon we won't have a club worth jacks**t to sell.
Revealed: From boardroom split to player revolt, the inside story of crisis engulfing Blackburn

Senior players revolt after poor start to season
Derek Shaw wants controversial Shebby Singh out
Club no closer to naming successor to Henning Berg


Read more: http://www.dailymail






.co.uk/sport/footbal






l/article-2255191/Bl






ackburn-Rovers-crisi






s-players-revolt-She






bby-Singh
Seriously?

You call that inside story?

Every man and his dog knows senior players were not impressed with Berg's appointment and the Daily Fail's exclusive already tells you who spun THAT leak.

"Shaw, An experienced administrator.. "

"That was the last straw.." Really Derek? Haven't heard an awful lot from you or that other Anderson stooge up to now. What happened? Singh taking all your power away to continue stealing money from the club via your dodgy agent dealings spoiled your plans?

As Sonny said, Singh may be a lot of things, but stripping the club of its assets isnt one of them. His ambitions are much less sinister - small comfort that it is - but it's becoming very apparent now who the "enemy" he referred to are, and the sooner they're gone the better.

With regard to the Senior players who are not happy, you are getting premiership wages to sit on your butts and to be brutally honest, you are average to downright mediocre in some cases, and if you want away in January, feel free to go. I very much doubt the big clubs are going to be hammering at the door to get most of you, but all the best and thank you for your contribution over the years is all I have to say to you.

HUGHES IN.
In what capacity can Shaw or Agnew make money from any transfer dealings exactly?
You've never heard of a kickback? :/
Yesterday you asked me if I had any proof/evidence to back-up my OPINIONS, accused fellow fans of stirring up hatred and scoffed at them for believing everything the papers print. Yet, here you are saying that Shaw and Agnew are getting kick-backs from player transfers.

Hmmm, I'm sure you know what's coming next but I'll ask you anyway: do you have any proof or evidence to substantiate your claims?
I'm not saying they are. I asked a question. A valid one, since its all everyone has said about the set up after Kean was installed and players sold off and cheapos brought in. Its not exactly a breaking story or news that fans have questioned agents involvement .. or did you miss that?
I suggest you reread what you typed before you try patronising me as that is exactly what you've said.
[quote][p][bold]blueblooded[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]srvp28[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]blueblooded[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]srvp28[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]blueblooded[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]edmy[/bold] wrote: Read the latest from the Daily Mail We have a contagious disease at Ewood it is called the Venkys. all it touches are doomed. "THE VENKYS" They sacked Sam, They appointed Kean, They got rid of a fantastic Board and several other prominent office staff. They presided over the removal of several senior players. They appointed Shebby. Who else is there to blame. If the don't sell soon we won't have a club worth jacks**t to sell. Revealed: From boardroom split to player revolt, the inside story of crisis engulfing Blackburn Senior players revolt after poor start to season Derek Shaw wants controversial Shebby Singh out Club no closer to naming successor to Henning Berg Read more: http://www.dailymail .co.uk/sport/footbal l/article-2255191/Bl ackburn-Rovers-crisi s-players-revolt-She bby-Singh[/p][/quote]Seriously? You call that inside story? Every man and his dog knows senior players were not impressed with Berg's appointment and the Daily Fail's exclusive already tells you who spun THAT leak. "Shaw, An experienced administrator.. " "That was the last straw.." Really Derek? Haven't heard an awful lot from you or that other Anderson stooge up to now. What happened? Singh taking all your power away to continue stealing money from the club via your dodgy agent dealings spoiled your plans? As Sonny said, Singh may be a lot of things, but stripping the club of its assets isnt one of them. His ambitions are much less sinister - small comfort that it is - but it's becoming very apparent now who the "enemy" he referred to are, and the sooner they're gone the better. With regard to the Senior players who are not happy, you are getting premiership wages to sit on your butts and to be brutally honest, you are average to downright mediocre in some cases, and if you want away in January, feel free to go. I very much doubt the big clubs are going to be hammering at the door to get most of you, but all the best and thank you for your contribution over the years is all I have to say to you. HUGHES IN.[/p][/quote]In what capacity can Shaw or Agnew make money from any transfer dealings exactly?[/p][/quote]You've never heard of a kickback? :/[/p][/quote]Yesterday you asked me if I had any proof/evidence to back-up my OPINIONS, accused fellow fans of stirring up hatred and scoffed at them for believing everything the papers print. Yet, here you are saying that Shaw and Agnew are getting kick-backs from player transfers. Hmmm, I'm sure you know what's coming next but I'll ask you anyway: do you have any proof or evidence to substantiate your claims?[/p][/quote]I'm not saying they are. I asked a question. A valid one, since its all everyone has said about the set up after Kean was installed and players sold off and cheapos brought in. Its not exactly a breaking story or news that fans have questioned agents involvement .. or did you miss that?[/p][/quote]I suggest you reread what you typed before you try patronising me as that is exactly what you've said. srvp28
  • Score: 0

6:50pm Mon 31 Dec 12

buzzinfly says...

Bangkok Rover wrote:
I'd rather have Shaw choose the manager than Singh. Bringing in coaches first then back-tracking after negative fans' reaction - what a shambles. Singh out. HNY to all!
And send us rght back into the 80's? He'd probably bring in Billy Davies.

Shaw and Agnew no idea, and nowhere to be seen or heard since they were employed.

They did a real good job at Preston didn't they!

Knives out boys, you watch my back, I'll watch yours.
[quote][p][bold]Bangkok Rover[/bold] wrote: I'd rather have Shaw choose the manager than Singh. Bringing in coaches first then back-tracking after negative fans' reaction - what a shambles. Singh out. HNY to all![/p][/quote]And send us rght back into the 80's? He'd probably bring in Billy Davies. Shaw and Agnew no idea, and nowhere to be seen or heard since they were employed. They did a real good job at Preston didn't they! Knives out boys, you watch my back, I'll watch yours. buzzinfly
  • Score: 0

7:01pm Mon 31 Dec 12

juanbbien says...

Dublin rover wrote:
so new years day we find out who the new boss is ?.is that in the morning or or 2014 hehe. but as i said in other posts all 3 must go. they must get on there knees and ask john willams and tony parks to come back. then we would get a good manager.i have got a feeling the venkys look at theses pages. so do the right thing venkys sell up or get john and tony in who love the club and know how to run it .And to all my fellow rovers fans
have a happy new
Why do we keep going on about John Williams,Tom Finn,Tony Parkes etc as much as they are respected it's never going happen with this lot so what's the point in keep putting their names forward,all the best to us ROVERS fans
[quote][p][bold]Dublin rover[/bold] wrote: so new years day we find out who the new boss is ?.is that in the morning or or 2014 hehe. but as i said in other posts all 3 must go. they must get on there knees and ask john willams and tony parks to come back. then we would get a good manager.i have got a feeling the venkys look at theses pages. so do the right thing venkys sell up or get john and tony in who love the club and know how to run it .And to all my fellow rovers fans have a happy new[/p][/quote]Why do we keep going on about John Williams,Tom Finn,Tony Parkes etc as much as they are respected it's never going happen with this lot so what's the point in keep putting their names forward,all the best to us ROVERS fans juanbbien
  • Score: 0

7:13pm Mon 31 Dec 12

alfa111 says...

Is Eckersley playing? wrote:
mike55 wrote:
Shebby Singh rather than wasting time showing Judan Ali how Rovers coach their team (not too well) should spend his time visiting Wigan Athletic, a glowing example of how a small town English club runs and operates a successful operation.It would be time well spent. Get the Venkys to arrange a visit too!!
What a good post! A first class chairman and a loyal, well respected manager. What a combination!
Second that fella but as we know all to well venkys and coco the clown no better than anybody else when it comes to football .
[quote][p][bold]Is Eckersley playing?[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]mike55[/bold] wrote: Shebby Singh rather than wasting time showing Judan Ali how Rovers coach their team (not too well) should spend his time visiting Wigan Athletic, a glowing example of how a small town English club runs and operates a successful operation.It would be time well spent. Get the Venkys to arrange a visit too!![/p][/quote]What a good post! A first class chairman and a loyal, well respected manager. What a combination![/p][/quote]Second that fella but as we know all to well venkys and coco the clown no better than anybody else when it comes to football . alfa111
  • Score: 0

7:22pm Mon 31 Dec 12

blueblooded says...

srvp28 wrote:
blueblooded wrote:
srvp28 wrote:
blueblooded wrote:
srvp28 wrote:
blueblooded wrote:
edmy wrote:
Read the latest from the Daily Mail We have a contagious disease at Ewood it is called the Venkys. all it touches are doomed.
"THE VENKYS" They sacked Sam, They appointed Kean, They got rid of a fantastic Board and several other prominent office staff. They presided over the removal of several senior players. They appointed Shebby. Who else is there to blame. If the don't sell soon we won't have a club worth jacks**t to sell.
Revealed: From boardroom split to player revolt, the inside story of crisis engulfing Blackburn

Senior players revolt after poor start to season
Derek Shaw wants controversial Shebby Singh out
Club no closer to naming successor to Henning Berg


Read more: http://www.dailymail







.co.uk/sport/footbal







l/article-2255191/Bl







ackburn-Rovers-crisi







s-players-revolt-She







bby-Singh
Seriously?

You call that inside story?

Every man and his dog knows senior players were not impressed with Berg's appointment and the Daily Fail's exclusive already tells you who spun THAT leak.

"Shaw, An experienced administrator.. "

"That was the last straw.." Really Derek? Haven't heard an awful lot from you or that other Anderson stooge up to now. What happened? Singh taking all your power away to continue stealing money from the club via your dodgy agent dealings spoiled your plans?

As Sonny said, Singh may be a lot of things, but stripping the club of its assets isnt one of them. His ambitions are much less sinister - small comfort that it is - but it's becoming very apparent now who the "enemy" he referred to are, and the sooner they're gone the better.

With regard to the Senior players who are not happy, you are getting premiership wages to sit on your butts and to be brutally honest, you are average to downright mediocre in some cases, and if you want away in January, feel free to go. I very much doubt the big clubs are going to be hammering at the door to get most of you, but all the best and thank you for your contribution over the years is all I have to say to you.

HUGHES IN.
In what capacity can Shaw or Agnew make money from any transfer dealings exactly?
You've never heard of a kickback? :/
Yesterday you asked me if I had any proof/evidence to back-up my OPINIONS, accused fellow fans of stirring up hatred and scoffed at them for believing everything the papers print. Yet, here you are saying that Shaw and Agnew are getting kick-backs from player transfers.

Hmmm, I'm sure you know what's coming next but I'll ask you anyway: do you have any proof or evidence to substantiate your claims?
I'm not saying they are. I asked a question. A valid one, since its all everyone has said about the set up after Kean was installed and players sold off and cheapos brought in. Its not exactly a breaking story or news that fans have questioned agents involvement .. or did you miss that?
I suggest you reread what you typed before you try patronising me as that is exactly what you've said.
I dont need to patronise you srvp, your posts speak for themselves.

But just to humour you:

"That was the last straw.." Really Derek? Haven't heard an awful lot from you or that other Anderson stooge up to now. What happened? Singh taking all your power away to continue stealing money from the club via your dodgy agent dealings spoiled your plans? "

FYI, the "?" at the end is called a question mark, used for denoting that a question is being asked.

Now THAT's patronising. Feel free to argue about the merits of the question but maybe tomorrow when the word of the day toilet paper brings a new word.
[quote][p][bold]srvp28[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]blueblooded[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]srvp28[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]blueblooded[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]srvp28[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]blueblooded[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]edmy[/bold] wrote: Read the latest from the Daily Mail We have a contagious disease at Ewood it is called the Venkys. all it touches are doomed. "THE VENKYS" They sacked Sam, They appointed Kean, They got rid of a fantastic Board and several other prominent office staff. They presided over the removal of several senior players. They appointed Shebby. Who else is there to blame. If the don't sell soon we won't have a club worth jacks**t to sell. Revealed: From boardroom split to player revolt, the inside story of crisis engulfing Blackburn Senior players revolt after poor start to season Derek Shaw wants controversial Shebby Singh out Club no closer to naming successor to Henning Berg Read more: http://www.dailymail .co.uk/sport/footbal l/article-2255191/Bl ackburn-Rovers-crisi s-players-revolt-She bby-Singh[/p][/quote]Seriously? You call that inside story? Every man and his dog knows senior players were not impressed with Berg's appointment and the Daily Fail's exclusive already tells you who spun THAT leak. "Shaw, An experienced administrator.. " "That was the last straw.." Really Derek? Haven't heard an awful lot from you or that other Anderson stooge up to now. What happened? Singh taking all your power away to continue stealing money from the club via your dodgy agent dealings spoiled your plans? As Sonny said, Singh may be a lot of things, but stripping the club of its assets isnt one of them. His ambitions are much less sinister - small comfort that it is - but it's becoming very apparent now who the "enemy" he referred to are, and the sooner they're gone the better. With regard to the Senior players who are not happy, you are getting premiership wages to sit on your butts and to be brutally honest, you are average to downright mediocre in some cases, and if you want away in January, feel free to go. I very much doubt the big clubs are going to be hammering at the door to get most of you, but all the best and thank you for your contribution over the years is all I have to say to you. HUGHES IN.[/p][/quote]In what capacity can Shaw or Agnew make money from any transfer dealings exactly?[/p][/quote]You've never heard of a kickback? :/[/p][/quote]Yesterday you asked me if I had any proof/evidence to back-up my OPINIONS, accused fellow fans of stirring up hatred and scoffed at them for believing everything the papers print. Yet, here you are saying that Shaw and Agnew are getting kick-backs from player transfers. Hmmm, I'm sure you know what's coming next but I'll ask you anyway: do you have any proof or evidence to substantiate your claims?[/p][/quote]I'm not saying they are. I asked a question. A valid one, since its all everyone has said about the set up after Kean was installed and players sold off and cheapos brought in. Its not exactly a breaking story or news that fans have questioned agents involvement .. or did you miss that?[/p][/quote]I suggest you reread what you typed before you try patronising me as that is exactly what you've said.[/p][/quote]I dont need to patronise you srvp, your posts speak for themselves. But just to humour you: "That was the last straw.." Really Derek? Haven't heard an awful lot from you or that other Anderson stooge up to now. What happened? Singh taking all your power away to continue stealing money from the club via your dodgy agent dealings spoiled your plans? " FYI, the "?" at the end is called a question mark, used for denoting that a question is being asked. Now THAT's patronising. Feel free to argue about the merits of the question but maybe tomorrow when the word of the day toilet paper brings a new word. blueblooded
  • Score: 0

7:23pm Mon 31 Dec 12

Reg Rover says...

REG IS BACK

I apologise for my absence over the past 8 weeks.
Obviously a lot of things have happened at Ewood during that time.
Just when I thought things were for the better following the departure of Steve (the man who could not win football matches) Kean along comes ‘loose cannon’ Shebby Singh pic above with weird and wonderful ideas that defy any logic.
With the possibility of a former Bollywood film star becoming the new Rovers manager, the cub is beyond a laughing stock.
I predicted at the beginning of this season when Rovers were in 4th place after a handful of games and Kean was still in place. That the Rovers would another relegation battle.
The same opinion applies even though Kean has gone. The scatter gun transfer policy of Kean and Singh has resulted in the signing of extremely mediocre players. The team is terrible and is flattered by it’ League position of 15th.
Any Rovers fan under the illusion that Rovers can mount a promotion challenge are sadly deluded.
Fighting off relegation and staying in the Championship is the only issue and some people need a reality check.
Clearly this site needs to spring back into action to highlight some of the issues blighting Ewood Park.
Reg will now return out of semi-retirement in the new year, Mrs Desai, Balaji and Ventkatesh Rao, Jerome Anderson and Shebby Singh, you have been warned.
REG IS BACK. WATCH THIS SPACE.
Reg.
www.regoftherovers.c
o.uk
REG IS BACK I apologise for my absence over the past 8 weeks. Obviously a lot of things have happened at Ewood during that time. Just when I thought things were for the better following the departure of Steve (the man who could not win football matches) Kean along comes ‘loose cannon’ Shebby Singh pic above with weird and wonderful ideas that defy any logic. With the possibility of a former Bollywood film star becoming the new Rovers manager, the cub is beyond a laughing stock. I predicted at the beginning of this season when Rovers were in 4th place after a handful of games and Kean was still in place. That the Rovers would another relegation battle. The same opinion applies even though Kean has gone. The scatter gun transfer policy of Kean and Singh has resulted in the signing of extremely mediocre players. The team is terrible and is flattered by it’ League position of 15th. Any Rovers fan under the illusion that Rovers can mount a promotion challenge are sadly deluded. Fighting off relegation and staying in the Championship is the only issue and some people need a reality check. Clearly this site needs to spring back into action to highlight some of the issues blighting Ewood Park. Reg will now return out of semi-retirement in the new year, Mrs Desai, Balaji and Ventkatesh Rao, Jerome Anderson and Shebby Singh, you have been warned. REG IS BACK. WATCH THIS SPACE. Reg. www.regoftherovers.c o.uk Reg Rover
  • Score: 0

7:32pm Mon 31 Dec 12

srvp28 says...

blueblooded wrote:
srvp28 wrote:
blueblooded wrote:
srvp28 wrote:
blueblooded wrote:
srvp28 wrote:
blueblooded wrote:
edmy wrote:
Read the latest from the Daily Mail We have a contagious disease at Ewood it is called the Venkys. all it touches are doomed.
"THE VENKYS" They sacked Sam, They appointed Kean, They got rid of a fantastic Board and several other prominent office staff. They presided over the removal of several senior players. They appointed Shebby. Who else is there to blame. If the don't sell soon we won't have a club worth jacks**t to sell.
Revealed: From boardroom split to player revolt, the inside story of crisis engulfing Blackburn

Senior players revolt after poor start to season
Derek Shaw wants controversial Shebby Singh out
Club no closer to naming successor to Henning Berg


Read more: http://www.dailymail








.co.uk/sport/footbal








l/article-2255191/Bl








ackburn-Rovers-crisi








s-players-revolt-She








bby-Singh
Seriously?

You call that inside story?

Every man and his dog knows senior players were not impressed with Berg's appointment and the Daily Fail's exclusive already tells you who spun THAT leak.

"Shaw, An experienced administrator.. "

"That was the last straw.." Really Derek? Haven't heard an awful lot from you or that other Anderson stooge up to now. What happened? Singh taking all your power away to continue stealing money from the club via your dodgy agent dealings spoiled your plans?

As Sonny said, Singh may be a lot of things, but stripping the club of its assets isnt one of them. His ambitions are much less sinister - small comfort that it is - but it's becoming very apparent now who the "enemy" he referred to are, and the sooner they're gone the better.

With regard to the Senior players who are not happy, you are getting premiership wages to sit on your butts and to be brutally honest, you are average to downright mediocre in some cases, and if you want away in January, feel free to go. I very much doubt the big clubs are going to be hammering at the door to get most of you, but all the best and thank you for your contribution over the years is all I have to say to you.

HUGHES IN.
In what capacity can Shaw or Agnew make money from any transfer dealings exactly?
You've never heard of a kickback? :/
Yesterday you asked me if I had any proof/evidence to back-up my OPINIONS, accused fellow fans of stirring up hatred and scoffed at them for believing everything the papers print. Yet, here you are saying that Shaw and Agnew are getting kick-backs from player transfers.

Hmmm, I'm sure you know what's coming next but I'll ask you anyway: do you have any proof or evidence to substantiate your claims?
I'm not saying they are. I asked a question. A valid one, since its all everyone has said about the set up after Kean was installed and players sold off and cheapos brought in. Its not exactly a breaking story or news that fans have questioned agents involvement .. or did you miss that?
I suggest you reread what you typed before you try patronising me as that is exactly what you've said.
I dont need to patronise you srvp, your posts speak for themselves.

But just to humour you:

"That was the last straw.." Really Derek? Haven't heard an awful lot from you or that other Anderson stooge up to now. What happened? Singh taking all your power away to continue stealing money from the club via your dodgy agent dealings spoiled your plans? "

FYI, the "?" at the end is called a question mark, used for denoting that a question is being asked.

Now THAT's patronising. Feel free to argue about the merits of the question but maybe tomorrow when the word of the day toilet paper brings a new word.
So that's twice you've tried to patronise me and twice you've failed.

"Singh taking all your power away to continue stealing money from the club via your dodgy agent dealings spoiled your plans?"

Yes, it's a question but it still contains the premise that you believe them to be taking kickbacks from underhand dealings. If you'd asked, "WERE you stealing money from the club before Singh came along, etc..." then it becomes a question without any personal beliefs attached to it.

I hope you've got some Aloe Vera to hand because you just got burned!
[quote][p][bold]blueblooded[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]srvp28[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]blueblooded[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]srvp28[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]blueblooded[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]srvp28[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]blueblooded[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]edmy[/bold] wrote: Read the latest from the Daily Mail We have a contagious disease at Ewood it is called the Venkys. all it touches are doomed. "THE VENKYS" They sacked Sam, They appointed Kean, They got rid of a fantastic Board and several other prominent office staff. They presided over the removal of several senior players. They appointed Shebby. Who else is there to blame. If the don't sell soon we won't have a club worth jacks**t to sell. Revealed: From boardroom split to player revolt, the inside story of crisis engulfing Blackburn Senior players revolt after poor start to season Derek Shaw wants controversial Shebby Singh out Club no closer to naming successor to Henning Berg Read more: http://www.dailymail .co.uk/sport/footbal l/article-2255191/Bl ackburn-Rovers-crisi s-players-revolt-She bby-Singh[/p][/quote]Seriously? You call that inside story? Every man and his dog knows senior players were not impressed with Berg's appointment and the Daily Fail's exclusive already tells you who spun THAT leak. "Shaw, An experienced administrator.. " "That was the last straw.." Really Derek? Haven't heard an awful lot from you or that other Anderson stooge up to now. What happened? Singh taking all your power away to continue stealing money from the club via your dodgy agent dealings spoiled your plans? As Sonny said, Singh may be a lot of things, but stripping the club of its assets isnt one of them. His ambitions are much less sinister - small comfort that it is - but it's becoming very apparent now who the "enemy" he referred to are, and the sooner they're gone the better. With regard to the Senior players who are not happy, you are getting premiership wages to sit on your butts and to be brutally honest, you are average to downright mediocre in some cases, and if you want away in January, feel free to go. I very much doubt the big clubs are going to be hammering at the door to get most of you, but all the best and thank you for your contribution over the years is all I have to say to you. HUGHES IN.[/p][/quote]In what capacity can Shaw or Agnew make money from any transfer dealings exactly?[/p][/quote]You've never heard of a kickback? :/[/p][/quote]Yesterday you asked me if I had any proof/evidence to back-up my OPINIONS, accused fellow fans of stirring up hatred and scoffed at them for believing everything the papers print. Yet, here you are saying that Shaw and Agnew are getting kick-backs from player transfers. Hmmm, I'm sure you know what's coming next but I'll ask you anyway: do you have any proof or evidence to substantiate your claims?[/p][/quote]I'm not saying they are. I asked a question. A valid one, since its all everyone has said about the set up after Kean was installed and players sold off and cheapos brought in. Its not exactly a breaking story or news that fans have questioned agents involvement .. or did you miss that?[/p][/quote]I suggest you reread what you typed before you try patronising me as that is exactly what you've said.[/p][/quote]I dont need to patronise you srvp, your posts speak for themselves. But just to humour you: "That was the last straw.." Really Derek? Haven't heard an awful lot from you or that other Anderson stooge up to now. What happened? Singh taking all your power away to continue stealing money from the club via your dodgy agent dealings spoiled your plans? " FYI, the "?" at the end is called a question mark, used for denoting that a question is being asked. Now THAT's patronising. Feel free to argue about the merits of the question but maybe tomorrow when the word of the day toilet paper brings a new word.[/p][/quote]So that's twice you've tried to patronise me and twice you've failed. "Singh taking all your power away to continue stealing money from the club via your dodgy agent dealings spoiled your plans?" Yes, it's a question but it still contains the premise that you believe them to be taking kickbacks from underhand dealings. If you'd asked, "WERE you stealing money from the club before Singh came along, etc..." then it becomes a question without any personal beliefs attached to it. I hope you've got some Aloe Vera to hand because you just got burned! srvp28
  • Score: 0

7:39pm Mon 31 Dec 12

Stone Island: says...

alfa111 wrote:
Is Eckersley playing? wrote:
mike55 wrote:
Shebby Singh rather than wasting time showing Judan Ali how Rovers coach their team (not too well) should spend his time visiting Wigan Athletic, a glowing example of how a small town English club runs and operates a successful operation.It would be time well spent. Get the Venkys to arrange a visit too!!
What a good post! A first class chairman and a loyal, well respected manager. What a combination!
Second that fella but as we know all to well venkys and coco the clown no better than anybody else when it comes to football .
I third it. BUT, is that not how we operated before we got taken over by charlatans? The vermin in India seem to have their own agenda. God knows what it is, but they seem hell bent on doing it their way, which will ultimately end in complete disaster, possibly even extinction.
[quote][p][bold]alfa111[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Is Eckersley playing?[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]mike55[/bold] wrote: Shebby Singh rather than wasting time showing Judan Ali how Rovers coach their team (not too well) should spend his time visiting Wigan Athletic, a glowing example of how a small town English club runs and operates a successful operation.It would be time well spent. Get the Venkys to arrange a visit too!![/p][/quote]What a good post! A first class chairman and a loyal, well respected manager. What a combination![/p][/quote]Second that fella but as we know all to well venkys and coco the clown no better than anybody else when it comes to football .[/p][/quote]I third it. BUT, is that not how we operated before we got taken over by charlatans? The vermin in India seem to have their own agenda. God knows what it is, but they seem hell bent on doing it their way, which will ultimately end in complete disaster, possibly even extinction. Stone Island:
  • Score: 0

8:04pm Mon 31 Dec 12

blueblooded says...

srvp28 wrote:
blueblooded wrote:
srvp28 wrote:
blueblooded wrote:
srvp28 wrote:
blueblooded wrote:
srvp28 wrote:
blueblooded wrote:
edmy wrote:
Read the latest from the Daily Mail We have a contagious disease at Ewood it is called the Venkys. all it touches are doomed.
"THE VENKYS" They sacked Sam, They appointed Kean, They got rid of a fantastic Board and several other prominent office staff. They presided over the removal of several senior players. They appointed Shebby. Who else is there to blame. If the don't sell soon we won't have a club worth jacks**t to sell.
Revealed: From boardroom split to player revolt, the inside story of crisis engulfing Blackburn

Senior players revolt after poor start to season
Derek Shaw wants controversial Shebby Singh out
Club no closer to naming successor to Henning Berg


Read more: http://www.dailymail









.co.uk/sport/footbal









l/article-2255191/Bl









ackburn-Rovers-crisi









s-players-revolt-She









bby-Singh
Seriously?

You call that inside story?

Every man and his dog knows senior players were not impressed with Berg's appointment and the Daily Fail's exclusive already tells you who spun THAT leak.

"Shaw, An experienced administrator.. "

"That was the last straw.." Really Derek? Haven't heard an awful lot from you or that other Anderson stooge up to now. What happened? Singh taking all your power away to continue stealing money from the club via your dodgy agent dealings spoiled your plans?

As Sonny said, Singh may be a lot of things, but stripping the club of its assets isnt one of them. His ambitions are much less sinister - small comfort that it is - but it's becoming very apparent now who the "enemy" he referred to are, and the sooner they're gone the better.

With regard to the Senior players who are not happy, you are getting premiership wages to sit on your butts and to be brutally honest, you are average to downright mediocre in some cases, and if you want away in January, feel free to go. I very much doubt the big clubs are going to be hammering at the door to get most of you, but all the best and thank you for your contribution over the years is all I have to say to you.

HUGHES IN.
In what capacity can Shaw or Agnew make money from any transfer dealings exactly?
You've never heard of a kickback? :/
Yesterday you asked me if I had any proof/evidence to back-up my OPINIONS, accused fellow fans of stirring up hatred and scoffed at them for believing everything the papers print. Yet, here you are saying that Shaw and Agnew are getting kick-backs from player transfers.

Hmmm, I'm sure you know what's coming next but I'll ask you anyway: do you have any proof or evidence to substantiate your claims?
I'm not saying they are. I asked a question. A valid one, since its all everyone has said about the set up after Kean was installed and players sold off and cheapos brought in. Its not exactly a breaking story or news that fans have questioned agents involvement .. or did you miss that?
I suggest you reread what you typed before you try patronising me as that is exactly what you've said.
I dont need to patronise you srvp, your posts speak for themselves.

But just to humour you:

"That was the last straw.." Really Derek? Haven't heard an awful lot from you or that other Anderson stooge up to now. What happened? Singh taking all your power away to continue stealing money from the club via your dodgy agent dealings spoiled your plans? "

FYI, the "?" at the end is called a question mark, used for denoting that a question is being asked.

Now THAT's patronising. Feel free to argue about the merits of the question but maybe tomorrow when the word of the day toilet paper brings a new word.
So that's twice you've tried to patronise me and twice you've failed.

"Singh taking all your power away to continue stealing money from the club via your dodgy agent dealings spoiled your plans?"

Yes, it's a question but it still contains the premise that you believe them to be taking kickbacks from underhand dealings. If you'd asked, "WERE you stealing money from the club before Singh came along, etc..." then it becomes a question without any personal beliefs attached to it.

I hope you've got some Aloe Vera to hand because you just got burned!
I just figured out tomorrows word of the day for you srvp.. its pedantic.

Also how old are you? Burned?

Hmm... 28 should be an age of maturity.. but people mature at different rates I suppose. Do yourself a favour, read back through both our posts and come back when you figure out what was wrong with the conversation. Till then I'll just assume your petulance is due to some need of attention, which clearly from your posts is telling.
[quote][p][bold]srvp28[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]blueblooded[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]srvp28[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]blueblooded[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]srvp28[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]blueblooded[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]srvp28[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]blueblooded[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]edmy[/bold] wrote: Read the latest from the Daily Mail We have a contagious disease at Ewood it is called the Venkys. all it touches are doomed. "THE VENKYS" They sacked Sam, They appointed Kean, They got rid of a fantastic Board and several other prominent office staff. They presided over the removal of several senior players. They appointed Shebby. Who else is there to blame. If the don't sell soon we won't have a club worth jacks**t to sell. Revealed: From boardroom split to player revolt, the inside story of crisis engulfing Blackburn Senior players revolt after poor start to season Derek Shaw wants controversial Shebby Singh out Club no closer to naming successor to Henning Berg Read more: http://www.dailymail .co.uk/sport/footbal l/article-2255191/Bl ackburn-Rovers-crisi s-players-revolt-She bby-Singh[/p][/quote]Seriously? You call that inside story? Every man and his dog knows senior players were not impressed with Berg's appointment and the Daily Fail's exclusive already tells you who spun THAT leak. "Shaw, An experienced administrator.. " "That was the last straw.." Really Derek? Haven't heard an awful lot from you or that other Anderson stooge up to now. What happened? Singh taking all your power away to continue stealing money from the club via your dodgy agent dealings spoiled your plans? As Sonny said, Singh may be a lot of things, but stripping the club of its assets isnt one of them. His ambitions are much less sinister - small comfort that it is - but it's becoming very apparent now who the "enemy" he referred to are, and the sooner they're gone the better. With regard to the Senior players who are not happy, you are getting premiership wages to sit on your butts and to be brutally honest, you are average to downright mediocre in some cases, and if you want away in January, feel free to go. I very much doubt the big clubs are going to be hammering at the door to get most of you, but all the best and thank you for your contribution over the years is all I have to say to you. HUGHES IN.[/p][/quote]In what capacity can Shaw or Agnew make money from any transfer dealings exactly?[/p][/quote]You've never heard of a kickback? :/[/p][/quote]Yesterday you asked me if I had any proof/evidence to back-up my OPINIONS, accused fellow fans of stirring up hatred and scoffed at them for believing everything the papers print. Yet, here you are saying that Shaw and Agnew are getting kick-backs from player transfers. Hmmm, I'm sure you know what's coming next but I'll ask you anyway: do you have any proof or evidence to substantiate your claims?[/p][/quote]I'm not saying they are. I asked a question. A valid one, since its all everyone has said about the set up after Kean was installed and players sold off and cheapos brought in. Its not exactly a breaking story or news that fans have questioned agents involvement .. or did you miss that?[/p][/quote]I suggest you reread what you typed before you try patronising me as that is exactly what you've said.[/p][/quote]I dont need to patronise you srvp, your posts speak for themselves. But just to humour you: "That was the last straw.." Really Derek? Haven't heard an awful lot from you or that other Anderson stooge up to now. What happened? Singh taking all your power away to continue stealing money from the club via your dodgy agent dealings spoiled your plans? " FYI, the "?" at the end is called a question mark, used for denoting that a question is being asked. Now THAT's patronising. Feel free to argue about the merits of the question but maybe tomorrow when the word of the day toilet paper brings a new word.[/p][/quote]So that's twice you've tried to patronise me and twice you've failed. "Singh taking all your power away to continue stealing money from the club via your dodgy agent dealings spoiled your plans?" Yes, it's a question but it still contains the premise that you believe them to be taking kickbacks from underhand dealings. If you'd asked, "WERE you stealing money from the club before Singh came along, etc..." then it becomes a question without any personal beliefs attached to it. I hope you've got some Aloe Vera to hand because you just got burned![/p][/quote]I just figured out tomorrows word of the day for you srvp.. its pedantic. Also how old are you? Burned? Hmm... 28 should be an age of maturity.. but people mature at different rates I suppose. Do yourself a favour, read back through both our posts and come back when you figure out what was wrong with the conversation. Till then I'll just assume your petulance is due to some need of attention, which clearly from your posts is telling. blueblooded
  • Score: 0

8:20pm Mon 31 Dec 12

Roverthere says...

A happy New Year to all Rovers fans, Let's start with a win tomorrow!
A happy New Year to all Rovers fans, Let's start with a win tomorrow! Roverthere
  • Score: 0

8:33pm Mon 31 Dec 12

kiwipom73 says...

For the first time I listened (with greart embarressment may I add...) to Singh on 606.
It would be like hearing someone with a Russian accent talking about the future of Lancashire cricket club !!!! (Just is not right....neither is it cricket or football !!!)
How many times he said "you know" before giving his evasive "dribble" to a question) I lost count half way through his time on air.
He certainly LOVES TO HEAR HIMSELF and also trys very hard to please all the people all of the time....YET, certainly does not "fool all the people" by a long shoot !!!
You get a feeling he is hell bent on being "Mr Popular" to feed his own ego and have the Venky,s hear what they wanting to hear...
Again, we can only go back to the background of the Venky,s & Singh,s whom both parties are without the slightest sign of experience at this level of Football we therefore can expect NO wisdom in decisions to be made for the future of the club.
Very sad to think there are people in the club playing their own power game to the detriment of the club....this also is very bad for the clubs future indeed.
Money plays a great part for many individuals and sadly it is very hard to see where the loyalty and honour of playing ...and being a part of the future of Blackburn Rovers, begins....and money (& ego,s) becoming the number one incensive !!!!!!?????
"you know" I love this Blackburn Rovers..."you know" I always think of Jack Walker "you know" ....and great players like Bryan Douglas & Ronnie Clayton you know....and I want the fans to know "you know" I want glory to return to the club you know....and I will be working day & night "you know" to make this happen.....ARE WE HAVING A LAUGH !!!
Very best wishes to all true Rovers supporters everywhere....
For the first time I listened (with greart embarressment may I add...) to Singh on 606. It would be like hearing someone with a Russian accent talking about the future of Lancashire cricket club !!!! (Just is not right....neither is it cricket or football !!!) How many times he said "you know" before giving his evasive "dribble" to a question) I lost count half way through his time on air. He certainly LOVES TO HEAR HIMSELF and also trys very hard to please all the people all of the time....YET, certainly does not "fool all the people" by a long shoot !!! You get a feeling he is hell bent on being "Mr Popular" to feed his own ego and have the Venky,s hear what they wanting to hear... Again, we can only go back to the background of the Venky,s & Singh,s whom both parties are without the slightest sign of experience at this level of Football we therefore can expect NO wisdom in decisions to be made for the future of the club. Very sad to think there are people in the club playing their own power game to the detriment of the club....this also is very bad for the clubs future indeed. Money plays a great part for many individuals and sadly it is very hard to see where the loyalty and honour of playing ...and being a part of the future of Blackburn Rovers, begins....and money (& ego,s) becoming the number one incensive !!!!!!????? "you know" I love this Blackburn Rovers..."you know" I always think of Jack Walker "you know" ....and great players like Bryan Douglas & Ronnie Clayton you know....and I want the fans to know "you know" I want glory to return to the club you know....and I will be working day & night "you know" to make this happen.....ARE WE HAVING A LAUGH !!! Very best wishes to all true Rovers supporters everywhere.... kiwipom73
  • Score: 0

8:41pm Mon 31 Dec 12

wilyrover says...

Shebby Singh is merely a puppet on a string. He took pelters for the delay in appointing Berg and now he is going to rush in and announce the Norwegians successor in a sop to the supporters. The man hasn't a clue. He is delusional, misguided and completely out of his depth. It's time for him to return to the warmth of a TV studio. However judging by his interview on 606, he's not good at that either. The man doesn't even seem to know what his job entails and now he has reputedly alienated Derek Shaw and Paul Agnew. He is a loose cannon and needs to leave the club now.
Shebby Singh is merely a puppet on a string. He took pelters for the delay in appointing Berg and now he is going to rush in and announce the Norwegians successor in a sop to the supporters. The man hasn't a clue. He is delusional, misguided and completely out of his depth. It's time for him to return to the warmth of a TV studio. However judging by his interview on 606, he's not good at that either. The man doesn't even seem to know what his job entails and now he has reputedly alienated Derek Shaw and Paul Agnew. He is a loose cannon and needs to leave the club now. wilyrover
  • Score: 0

8:42pm Mon 31 Dec 12

srvp28 says...

blueblooded wrote:
srvp28 wrote:
blueblooded wrote:
srvp28 wrote:
blueblooded wrote:
srvp28 wrote:
blueblooded wrote:
srvp28 wrote:
blueblooded wrote:
edmy wrote:
Read the latest from the Daily Mail We have a contagious disease at Ewood it is called the Venkys. all it touches are doomed.
"THE VENKYS" They sacked Sam, They appointed Kean, They got rid of a fantastic Board and several other prominent office staff. They presided over the removal of several senior players. They appointed Shebby. Who else is there to blame. If the don't sell soon we won't have a club worth jacks**t to sell.
Revealed: From boardroom split to player revolt, the inside story of crisis engulfing Blackburn

Senior players revolt after poor start to season
Derek Shaw wants controversial Shebby Singh out
Club no closer to naming successor to Henning Berg


Read more: http://www.dailymail










.co.uk/sport/footbal










l/article-2255191/Bl










ackburn-Rovers-crisi










s-players-revolt-She










bby-Singh
Seriously?

You call that inside story?

Every man and his dog knows senior players were not impressed with Berg's appointment and the Daily Fail's exclusive already tells you who spun THAT leak.

"Shaw, An experienced administrator.. "

"That was the last straw.." Really Derek? Haven't heard an awful lot from you or that other Anderson stooge up to now. What happened? Singh taking all your power away to continue stealing money from the club via your dodgy agent dealings spoiled your plans?

As Sonny said, Singh may be a lot of things, but stripping the club of its assets isnt one of them. His ambitions are much less sinister - small comfort that it is - but it's becoming very apparent now who the "enemy" he referred to are, and the sooner they're gone the better.

With regard to the Senior players who are not happy, you are getting premiership wages to sit on your butts and to be brutally honest, you are average to downright mediocre in some cases, and if you want away in January, feel free to go. I very much doubt the big clubs are going to be hammering at the door to get most of you, but all the best and thank you for your contribution over the years is all I have to say to you.

HUGHES IN.
In what capacity can Shaw or Agnew make money from any transfer dealings exactly?
You've never heard of a kickback? :/
Yesterday you asked me if I had any proof/evidence to back-up my OPINIONS, accused fellow fans of stirring up hatred and scoffed at them for believing everything the papers print. Yet, here you are saying that Shaw and Agnew are getting kick-backs from player transfers.

Hmmm, I'm sure you know what's coming next but I'll ask you anyway: do you have any proof or evidence to substantiate your claims?
I'm not saying they are. I asked a question. A valid one, since its all everyone has said about the set up after Kean was installed and players sold off and cheapos brought in. Its not exactly a breaking story or news that fans have questioned agents involvement .. or did you miss that?
I suggest you reread what you typed before you try patronising me as that is exactly what you've said.
I dont need to patronise you srvp, your posts speak for themselves.

But just to humour you:

"That was the last straw.." Really Derek? Haven't heard an awful lot from you or that other Anderson stooge up to now. What happened? Singh taking all your power away to continue stealing money from the club via your dodgy agent dealings spoiled your plans? "

FYI, the "?" at the end is called a question mark, used for denoting that a question is being asked.

Now THAT's patronising. Feel free to argue about the merits of the question but maybe tomorrow when the word of the day toilet paper brings a new word.
So that's twice you've tried to patronise me and twice you've failed.

"Singh taking all your power away to continue stealing money from the club via your dodgy agent dealings spoiled your plans?"

Yes, it's a question but it still contains the premise that you believe them to be taking kickbacks from underhand dealings. If you'd asked, "WERE you stealing money from the club before Singh came along, etc..." then it becomes a question without any personal beliefs attached to it.

I hope you've got some Aloe Vera to hand because you just got burned!
I just figured out tomorrows word of the day for you srvp.. its pedantic.

Also how old are you? Burned?

Hmm... 28 should be an age of maturity.. but people mature at different rates I suppose. Do yourself a favour, read back through both our posts and come back when you figure out what was wrong with the conversation. Till then I'll just assume your petulance is due to some need of attention, which clearly from your posts is telling.
If you try to patronise someone they are well within their rights to correct you without being called pedantic. for starters ut doesnt fit in with the context or thread of the conversation. Just because you try to make other people look stupid it doesn't mean you're always right. You tried to belittle me, like you do everyone else on here, but you ended up making yourself look stupid.

Trying to make out that I'm juvenile because I used the word 'burned', or making out that I'm intellectually inferior to you by referencing 'Word of the Day' toilet paper is not only desperate but also very sad. Even if either were true, which they're not, it still doesn't detract from the fact that your patronising was premature. If anything, It would have been better if I was juvenile and stupid, it would make your humbling all the better.

I've reread our conversation and there's nothing in there to convince me that I was wrong. All I've learned is that you're so hell bent on being right all the time that when you're wrong you try and detract from other people's arguments by insulting them and insinuating that they're not as intelligent as you.

I dare say that this is where you'll type something along the lines of, 'I don't have to insinuate anything, your posts prove my point'. Or something equally as childish. Just for the record, 28 isn't my age, so I guess that's another thing you were wrong about. Not that age has a direct correlation to intelligence.

It doesn't matter what insults you come back with, and you will, it won't change the fact that you had the smug grin wiped off your face for a change. Even if you won't admit it, anybody who reads this thread will know it.

Perhaps one of your resolutions should be to stop exerting your self-importance over your fellow fans. Don't waste my time again.

Happy New Year.
[quote][p][bold]blueblooded[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]srvp28[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]blueblooded[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]srvp28[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]blueblooded[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]srvp28[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]blueblooded[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]srvp28[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]blueblooded[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]edmy[/bold] wrote: Read the latest from the Daily Mail We have a contagious disease at Ewood it is called the Venkys. all it touches are doomed. "THE VENKYS" They sacked Sam, They appointed Kean, They got rid of a fantastic Board and several other prominent office staff. They presided over the removal of several senior players. They appointed Shebby. Who else is there to blame. If the don't sell soon we won't have a club worth jacks**t to sell. Revealed: From boardroom split to player revolt, the inside story of crisis engulfing Blackburn Senior players revolt after poor start to season Derek Shaw wants controversial Shebby Singh out Club no closer to naming successor to Henning Berg Read more: http://www.dailymail .co.uk/sport/footbal l/article-2255191/Bl ackburn-Rovers-crisi s-players-revolt-She bby-Singh[/p][/quote]Seriously? You call that inside story? Every man and his dog knows senior players were not impressed with Berg's appointment and the Daily Fail's exclusive already tells you who spun THAT leak. "Shaw, An experienced administrator.. " "That was the last straw.." Really Derek? Haven't heard an awful lot from you or that other Anderson stooge up to now. What happened? Singh taking all your power away to continue stealing money from the club via your dodgy agent dealings spoiled your plans? As Sonny said, Singh may be a lot of things, but stripping the club of its assets isnt one of them. His ambitions are much less sinister - small comfort that it is - but it's becoming very apparent now who the "enemy" he referred to are, and the sooner they're gone the better. With regard to the Senior players who are not happy, you are getting premiership wages to sit on your butts and to be brutally honest, you are average to downright mediocre in some cases, and if you want away in January, feel free to go. I very much doubt the big clubs are going to be hammering at the door to get most of you, but all the best and thank you for your contribution over the years is all I have to say to you. HUGHES IN.[/p][/quote]In what capacity can Shaw or Agnew make money from any transfer dealings exactly?[/p][/quote]You've never heard of a kickback? :/[/p][/quote]Yesterday you asked me if I had any proof/evidence to back-up my OPINIONS, accused fellow fans of stirring up hatred and scoffed at them for believing everything the papers print. Yet, here you are saying that Shaw and Agnew are getting kick-backs from player transfers. Hmmm, I'm sure you know what's coming next but I'll ask you anyway: do you have any proof or evidence to substantiate your claims?[/p][/quote]I'm not saying they are. I asked a question. A valid one, since its all everyone has said about the set up after Kean was installed and players sold off and cheapos brought in. Its not exactly a breaking story or news that fans have questioned agents involvement .. or did you miss that?[/p][/quote]I suggest you reread what you typed before you try patronising me as that is exactly what you've said.[/p][/quote]I dont need to patronise you srvp, your posts speak for themselves. But just to humour you: "That was the last straw.." Really Derek? Haven't heard an awful lot from you or that other Anderson stooge up to now. What happened? Singh taking all your power away to continue stealing money from the club via your dodgy agent dealings spoiled your plans? " FYI, the "?" at the end is called a question mark, used for denoting that a question is being asked. Now THAT's patronising. Feel free to argue about the merits of the question but maybe tomorrow when the word of the day toilet paper brings a new word.[/p][/quote]So that's twice you've tried to patronise me and twice you've failed. "Singh taking all your power away to continue stealing money from the club via your dodgy agent dealings spoiled your plans?" Yes, it's a question but it still contains the premise that you believe them to be taking kickbacks from underhand dealings. If you'd asked, "WERE you stealing money from the club before Singh came along, etc..." then it becomes a question without any personal beliefs attached to it. I hope you've got some Aloe Vera to hand because you just got burned![/p][/quote]I just figured out tomorrows word of the day for you srvp.. its pedantic. Also how old are you? Burned? Hmm... 28 should be an age of maturity.. but people mature at different rates I suppose. Do yourself a favour, read back through both our posts and come back when you figure out what was wrong with the conversation. Till then I'll just assume your petulance is due to some need of attention, which clearly from your posts is telling.[/p][/quote]If you try to patronise someone they are well within their rights to correct you without being called pedantic. for starters ut doesnt fit in with the context or thread of the conversation. Just because you try to make other people look stupid it doesn't mean you're always right. You tried to belittle me, like you do everyone else on here, but you ended up making yourself look stupid. Trying to make out that I'm juvenile because I used the word 'burned', or making out that I'm intellectually inferior to you by referencing 'Word of the Day' toilet paper is not only desperate but also very sad. Even if either were true, which they're not, it still doesn't detract from the fact that your patronising was premature. If anything, It would have been better if I was juvenile and stupid, it would make your humbling all the better. I've reread our conversation and there's nothing in there to convince me that I was wrong. All I've learned is that you're so hell bent on being right all the time that when you're wrong you try and detract from other people's arguments by insulting them and insinuating that they're not as intelligent as you. I dare say that this is where you'll type something along the lines of, 'I don't have to insinuate anything, your posts prove my point'. Or something equally as childish. Just for the record, 28 isn't my age, so I guess that's another thing you were wrong about. Not that age has a direct correlation to intelligence. It doesn't matter what insults you come back with, and you will, it won't change the fact that you had the smug grin wiped off your face for a change. Even if you won't admit it, anybody who reads this thread will know it. Perhaps one of your resolutions should be to stop exerting your self-importance over your fellow fans. Don't waste my time again. Happy New Year. srvp28
  • Score: 0

9:14pm Mon 31 Dec 12

blueblooded says...

srvp28 wrote:
blueblooded wrote:
srvp28 wrote:
blueblooded wrote:
srvp28 wrote:
blueblooded wrote:
srvp28 wrote:
blueblooded wrote:
srvp28 wrote:
blueblooded wrote:
edmy wrote:
Read the latest from the Daily Mail We have a contagious disease at Ewood it is called the Venkys. all it touches are doomed.
"THE VENKYS" They sacked Sam, They appointed Kean, They got rid of a fantastic Board and several other prominent office staff. They presided over the removal of several senior players. They appointed Shebby. Who else is there to blame. If the don't sell soon we won't have a club worth jacks**t to sell.
Revealed: From boardroom split to player revolt, the inside story of crisis engulfing Blackburn

Senior players revolt after poor start to season
Derek Shaw wants controversial Shebby Singh out
Club no closer to naming successor to Henning Berg


Read more: http://www.dailymail











.co.uk/sport/footbal











l/article-2255191/Bl











ackburn-Rovers-crisi











s-players-revolt-She











bby-Singh
Seriously?

You call that inside story?

Every man and his dog knows senior players were not impressed with Berg's appointment and the Daily Fail's exclusive already tells you who spun THAT leak.

"Shaw, An experienced administrator.. "

"That was the last straw.." Really Derek? Haven't heard an awful lot from you or that other Anderson stooge up to now. What happened? Singh taking all your power away to continue stealing money from the club via your dodgy agent dealings spoiled your plans?

As Sonny said, Singh may be a lot of things, but stripping the club of its assets isnt one of them. His ambitions are much less sinister - small comfort that it is - but it's becoming very apparent now who the "enemy" he referred to are, and the sooner they're gone the better.

With regard to the Senior players who are not happy, you are getting premiership wages to sit on your butts and to be brutally honest, you are average to downright mediocre in some cases, and if you want away in January, feel free to go. I very much doubt the big clubs are going to be hammering at the door to get most of you, but all the best and thank you for your contribution over the years is all I have to say to you.

HUGHES IN.
In what capacity can Shaw or Agnew make money from any transfer dealings exactly?
You've never heard of a kickback? :/
Yesterday you asked me if I had any proof/evidence to back-up my OPINIONS, accused fellow fans of stirring up hatred and scoffed at them for believing everything the papers print. Yet, here you are saying that Shaw and Agnew are getting kick-backs from player transfers.

Hmmm, I'm sure you know what's coming next but I'll ask you anyway: do you have any proof or evidence to substantiate your claims?
I'm not saying they are. I asked a question. A valid one, since its all everyone has said about the set up after Kean was installed and players sold off and cheapos brought in. Its not exactly a breaking story or news that fans have questioned agents involvement .. or did you miss that?
I suggest you reread what you typed before you try patronising me as that is exactly what you've said.
I dont need to patronise you srvp, your posts speak for themselves.

But just to humour you:

"That was the last straw.." Really Derek? Haven't heard an awful lot from you or that other Anderson stooge up to now. What happened? Singh taking all your power away to continue stealing money from the club via your dodgy agent dealings spoiled your plans? "

FYI, the "?" at the end is called a question mark, used for denoting that a question is being asked.

Now THAT's patronising. Feel free to argue about the merits of the question but maybe tomorrow when the word of the day toilet paper brings a new word.
So that's twice you've tried to patronise me and twice you've failed.

"Singh taking all your power away to continue stealing money from the club via your dodgy agent dealings spoiled your plans?"

Yes, it's a question but it still contains the premise that you believe them to be taking kickbacks from underhand dealings. If you'd asked, "WERE you stealing money from the club before Singh came along, etc..." then it becomes a question without any personal beliefs attached to it.

I hope you've got some Aloe Vera to hand because you just got burned!
I just figured out tomorrows word of the day for you srvp.. its pedantic.

Also how old are you? Burned?

Hmm... 28 should be an age of maturity.. but people mature at different rates I suppose. Do yourself a favour, read back through both our posts and come back when you figure out what was wrong with the conversation. Till then I'll just assume your petulance is due to some need of attention, which clearly from your posts is telling.
If you try to patronise someone they are well within their rights to correct you without being called pedantic. for starters ut doesnt fit in with the context or thread of the conversation. Just because you try to make other people look stupid it doesn't mean you're always right. You tried to belittle me, like you do everyone else on here, but you ended up making yourself look stupid.

Trying to make out that I'm juvenile because I used the word 'burned', or making out that I'm intellectually inferior to you by referencing 'Word of the Day' toilet paper is not only desperate but also very sad. Even if either were true, which they're not, it still doesn't detract from the fact that your patronising was premature. If anything, It would have been better if I was juvenile and stupid, it would make your humbling all the better.

I've reread our conversation and there's nothing in there to convince me that I was wrong. All I've learned is that you're so hell bent on being right all the time that when you're wrong you try and detract from other people's arguments by insulting them and insinuating that they're not as intelligent as you.

I dare say that this is where you'll type something along the lines of, 'I don't have to insinuate anything, your posts prove my point'. Or something equally as childish. Just for the record, 28 isn't my age, so I guess that's another thing you were wrong about. Not that age has a direct correlation to intelligence.

It doesn't matter what insults you come back with, and you will, it won't change the fact that you had the smug grin wiped off your face for a change. Even if you won't admit it, anybody who reads this thread will know it.

Perhaps one of your resolutions should be to stop exerting your self-importance over your fellow fans. Don't waste my time again.

Happy New Year.
I wont bother requoting as its annoying but actually the only word that came to mind was YAWN. Jesus how boring was that post? it reminded me of Shebby's how to waffle and say nothing of real importance.

Maybe I'll reread it at midnight if I'm having trouble sleeping. srvp, I honestly wouldn't know where to start with your posts. you seemingly only to want to pick fights to prove pointless points to the point, that the point itself is lost.

Its new years eve. Lighten up and go have drink. I don't know which is worse, you for your boring the pants off me or me replying back to you.

And yes. Happy New Year to you too.
[quote][p][bold]srvp28[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]blueblooded[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]srvp28[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]blueblooded[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]srvp28[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]blueblooded[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]srvp28[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]blueblooded[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]srvp28[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]blueblooded[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]edmy[/bold] wrote: Read the latest from the Daily Mail We have a contagious disease at Ewood it is called the Venkys. all it touches are doomed. "THE VENKYS" They sacked Sam, They appointed Kean, They got rid of a fantastic Board and several other prominent office staff. They presided over the removal of several senior players. They appointed Shebby. Who else is there to blame. If the don't sell soon we won't have a club worth jacks**t to sell. Revealed: From boardroom split to player revolt, the inside story of crisis engulfing Blackburn Senior players revolt after poor start to season Derek Shaw wants controversial Shebby Singh out Club no closer to naming successor to Henning Berg Read more: http://www.dailymail .co.uk/sport/footbal l/article-2255191/Bl ackburn-Rovers-crisi s-players-revolt-She bby-Singh[/p][/quote]Seriously? You call that inside story? Every man and his dog knows senior players were not impressed with Berg's appointment and the Daily Fail's exclusive already tells you who spun THAT leak. "Shaw, An experienced administrator.. " "That was the last straw.." Really Derek? Haven't heard an awful lot from you or that other Anderson stooge up to now. What happened? Singh taking all your power away to continue stealing money from the club via your dodgy agent dealings spoiled your plans? As Sonny said, Singh may be a lot of things, but stripping the club of its assets isnt one of them. His ambitions are much less sinister - small comfort that it is - but it's becoming very apparent now who the "enemy" he referred to are, and the sooner they're gone the better. With regard to the Senior players who are not happy, you are getting premiership wages to sit on your butts and to be brutally honest, you are average to downright mediocre in some cases, and if you want away in January, feel free to go. I very much doubt the big clubs are going to be hammering at the door to get most of you, but all the best and thank you for your contribution over the years is all I have to say to you. HUGHES IN.[/p][/quote]In what capacity can Shaw or Agnew make money from any transfer dealings exactly?[/p][/quote]You've never heard of a kickback? :/[/p][/quote]Yesterday you asked me if I had any proof/evidence to back-up my OPINIONS, accused fellow fans of stirring up hatred and scoffed at them for believing everything the papers print. Yet, here you are saying that Shaw and Agnew are getting kick-backs from player transfers. Hmmm, I'm sure you know what's coming next but I'll ask you anyway: do you have any proof or evidence to substantiate your claims?[/p][/quote]I'm not saying they are. I asked a question. A valid one, since its all everyone has said about the set up after Kean was installed and players sold off and cheapos brought in. Its not exactly a breaking story or news that fans have questioned agents involvement .. or did you miss that?[/p][/quote]I suggest you reread what you typed before you try patronising me as that is exactly what you've said.[/p][/quote]I dont need to patronise you srvp, your posts speak for themselves. But just to humour you: "That was the last straw.." Really Derek? Haven't heard an awful lot from you or that other Anderson stooge up to now. What happened? Singh taking all your power away to continue stealing money from the club via your dodgy agent dealings spoiled your plans? " FYI, the "?" at the end is called a question mark, used for denoting that a question is being asked. Now THAT's patronising. Feel free to argue about the merits of the question but maybe tomorrow when the word of the day toilet paper brings a new word.[/p][/quote]So that's twice you've tried to patronise me and twice you've failed. "Singh taking all your power away to continue stealing money from the club via your dodgy agent dealings spoiled your plans?" Yes, it's a question but it still contains the premise that you believe them to be taking kickbacks from underhand dealings. If you'd asked, "WERE you stealing money from the club before Singh came along, etc..." then it becomes a question without any personal beliefs attached to it. I hope you've got some Aloe Vera to hand because you just got burned![/p][/quote]I just figured out tomorrows word of the day for you srvp.. its pedantic. Also how old are you? Burned? Hmm... 28 should be an age of maturity.. but people mature at different rates I suppose. Do yourself a favour, read back through both our posts and come back when you figure out what was wrong with the conversation. Till then I'll just assume your petulance is due to some need of attention, which clearly from your posts is telling.[/p][/quote]If you try to patronise someone they are well within their rights to correct you without being called pedantic. for starters ut doesnt fit in with the context or thread of the conversation. Just because you try to make other people look stupid it doesn't mean you're always right. You tried to belittle me, like you do everyone else on here, but you ended up making yourself look stupid. Trying to make out that I'm juvenile because I used the word 'burned', or making out that I'm intellectually inferior to you by referencing 'Word of the Day' toilet paper is not only desperate but also very sad. Even if either were true, which they're not, it still doesn't detract from the fact that your patronising was premature. If anything, It would have been better if I was juvenile and stupid, it would make your humbling all the better. I've reread our conversation and there's nothing in there to convince me that I was wrong. All I've learned is that you're so hell bent on being right all the time that when you're wrong you try and detract from other people's arguments by insulting them and insinuating that they're not as intelligent as you. I dare say that this is where you'll type something along the lines of, 'I don't have to insinuate anything, your posts prove my point'. Or something equally as childish. Just for the record, 28 isn't my age, so I guess that's another thing you were wrong about. Not that age has a direct correlation to intelligence. It doesn't matter what insults you come back with, and you will, it won't change the fact that you had the smug grin wiped off your face for a change. Even if you won't admit it, anybody who reads this thread will know it. Perhaps one of your resolutions should be to stop exerting your self-importance over your fellow fans. Don't waste my time again. Happy New Year.[/p][/quote]I wont bother requoting as its annoying but actually the only word that came to mind was YAWN. Jesus how boring was that post? it reminded me of Shebby's how to waffle and say nothing of real importance. Maybe I'll reread it at midnight if I'm having trouble sleeping. srvp, I honestly wouldn't know where to start with your posts. you seemingly only to want to pick fights to prove pointless points to the point, that the point itself is lost. Its new years eve. Lighten up and go have drink. I don't know which is worse, you for your boring the pants off me or me replying back to you. And yes. Happy New Year to you too. blueblooded
  • Score: 0

9:41pm Mon 31 Dec 12

srvp28 says...

blueblooded wrote:
srvp28 wrote:
blueblooded wrote:
srvp28 wrote:
blueblooded wrote:
srvp28 wrote:
blueblooded wrote:
srvp28 wrote:
blueblooded wrote:
srvp28 wrote:
blueblooded wrote:
edmy wrote:
Read the latest from the Daily Mail We have a contagious disease at Ewood it is called the Venkys. all it touches are doomed.
"THE VENKYS" They sacked Sam, They appointed Kean, They got rid of a fantastic Board and several other prominent office staff. They presided over the removal of several senior players. They appointed Shebby. Who else is there to blame. If the don't sell soon we won't have a club worth jacks**t to sell.
Revealed: From boardroom split to player revolt, the inside story of crisis engulfing Blackburn

Senior players revolt after poor start to season
Derek Shaw wants controversial Shebby Singh out
Club no closer to naming successor to Henning Berg


Read more: http://www.dailymail












.co.uk/sport/footbal












l/article-2255191/Bl












ackburn-Rovers-crisi












s-players-revolt-She












bby-Singh
Seriously?

You call that inside story?

Every man and his dog knows senior players were not impressed with Berg's appointment and the Daily Fail's exclusive already tells you who spun THAT leak.

"Shaw, An experienced administrator.. "

"That was the last straw.." Really Derek? Haven't heard an awful lot from you or that other Anderson stooge up to now. What happened? Singh taking all your power away to continue stealing money from the club via your dodgy agent dealings spoiled your plans?

As Sonny said, Singh may be a lot of things, but stripping the club of its assets isnt one of them. His ambitions are much less sinister - small comfort that it is - but it's becoming very apparent now who the "enemy" he referred to are, and the sooner they're gone the better.

With regard to the Senior players who are not happy, you are getting premiership wages to sit on your butts and to be brutally honest, you are average to downright mediocre in some cases, and if you want away in January, feel free to go. I very much doubt the big clubs are going to be hammering at the door to get most of you, but all the best and thank you for your contribution over the years is all I have to say to you.

HUGHES IN.
In what capacity can Shaw or Agnew make money from any transfer dealings exactly?
You've never heard of a kickback? :/
Yesterday you asked me if I had any proof/evidence to back-up my OPINIONS, accused fellow fans of stirring up hatred and scoffed at them for believing everything the papers print. Yet, here you are saying that Shaw and Agnew are getting kick-backs from player transfers.

Hmmm, I'm sure you know what's coming next but I'll ask you anyway: do you have any proof or evidence to substantiate your claims?
I'm not saying they are. I asked a question. A valid one, since its all everyone has said about the set up after Kean was installed and players sold off and cheapos brought in. Its not exactly a breaking story or news that fans have questioned agents involvement .. or did you miss that?
I suggest you reread what you typed before you try patronising me as that is exactly what you've said.
I dont need to patronise you srvp, your posts speak for themselves.

But just to humour you:

"That was the last straw.." Really Derek? Haven't heard an awful lot from you or that other Anderson stooge up to now. What happened? Singh taking all your power away to continue stealing money from the club via your dodgy agent dealings spoiled your plans? "

FYI, the "?" at the end is called a question mark, used for denoting that a question is being asked.

Now THAT's patronising. Feel free to argue about the merits of the question but maybe tomorrow when the word of the day toilet paper brings a new word.
So that's twice you've tried to patronise me and twice you've failed.

"Singh taking all your power away to continue stealing money from the club via your dodgy agent dealings spoiled your plans?"

Yes, it's a question but it still contains the premise that you believe them to be taking kickbacks from underhand dealings. If you'd asked, "WERE you stealing money from the club before Singh came along, etc..." then it becomes a question without any personal beliefs attached to it.

I hope you've got some Aloe Vera to hand because you just got burned!
I just figured out tomorrows word of the day for you srvp.. its pedantic.

Also how old are you? Burned?

Hmm... 28 should be an age of maturity.. but people mature at different rates I suppose. Do yourself a favour, read back through both our posts and come back when you figure out what was wrong with the conversation. Till then I'll just assume your petulance is due to some need of attention, which clearly from your posts is telling.
If you try to patronise someone they are well within their rights to correct you without being called pedantic. for starters ut doesnt fit in with the context or thread of the conversation. Just because you try to make other people look stupid it doesn't mean you're always right. You tried to belittle me, like you do everyone else on here, but you ended up making yourself look stupid.

Trying to make out that I'm juvenile because I used the word 'burned', or making out that I'm intellectually inferior to you by referencing 'Word of the Day' toilet paper is not only desperate but also very sad. Even if either were true, which they're not, it still doesn't detract from the fact that your patronising was premature. If anything, It would have been better if I was juvenile and stupid, it would make your humbling all the better.

I've reread our conversation and there's nothing in there to convince me that I was wrong. All I've learned is that you're so hell bent on being right all the time that when you're wrong you try and detract from other people's arguments by insulting them and insinuating that they're not as intelligent as you.

I dare say that this is where you'll type something along the lines of, 'I don't have to insinuate anything, your posts prove my point'. Or something equally as childish. Just for the record, 28 isn't my age, so I guess that's another thing you were wrong about. Not that age has a direct correlation to intelligence.

It doesn't matter what insults you come back with, and you will, it won't change the fact that you had the smug grin wiped off your face for a change. Even if you won't admit it, anybody who reads this thread will know it.

Perhaps one of your resolutions should be to stop exerting your self-importance over your fellow fans. Don't waste my time again.

Happy New Year.
I wont bother requoting as its annoying but actually the only word that came to mind was YAWN. Jesus how boring was that post? it reminded me of Shebby's how to waffle and say nothing of real importance.

Maybe I'll reread it at midnight if I'm having trouble sleeping. srvp, I honestly wouldn't know where to start with your posts. you seemingly only to want to pick fights to prove pointless points to the point, that the point itself is lost.

Its new years eve. Lighten up and go have drink. I don't know which is worse, you for your boring the pants off me or me replying back to you.

And yes. Happy New Year to you too.
My posts are boring and I'm only interested in picking fights? Hmmm, 'pot, kettle, black' definitely springs to mind, especially seeing as how it was you who got on my case yesterday. All I was doing today was pointing out the hypocrisy in your posts. You're still doing it on another page.

I suggest you take your own advice and lighten up yourself.
[quote][p][bold]blueblooded[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]srvp28[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]blueblooded[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]srvp28[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]blueblooded[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]srvp28[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]blueblooded[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]srvp28[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]blueblooded[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]srvp28[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]blueblooded[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]edmy[/bold] wrote: Read the latest from the Daily Mail We have a contagious disease at Ewood it is called the Venkys. all it touches are doomed. "THE VENKYS" They sacked Sam, They appointed Kean, They got rid of a fantastic Board and several other prominent office staff. They presided over the removal of several senior players. They appointed Shebby. Who else is there to blame. If the don't sell soon we won't have a club worth jacks**t to sell. Revealed: From boardroom split to player revolt, the inside story of crisis engulfing Blackburn Senior players revolt after poor start to season Derek Shaw wants controversial Shebby Singh out Club no closer to naming successor to Henning Berg Read more: http://www.dailymail .co.uk/sport/footbal l/article-2255191/Bl ackburn-Rovers-crisi s-players-revolt-She bby-Singh[/p][/quote]Seriously? You call that inside story? Every man and his dog knows senior players were not impressed with Berg's appointment and the Daily Fail's exclusive already tells you who spun THAT leak. "Shaw, An experienced administrator.. " "That was the last straw.." Really Derek? Haven't heard an awful lot from you or that other Anderson stooge up to now. What happened? Singh taking all your power away to continue stealing money from the club via your dodgy agent dealings spoiled your plans? As Sonny said, Singh may be a lot of things, but stripping the club of its assets isnt one of them. His ambitions are much less sinister - small comfort that it is - but it's becoming very apparent now who the "enemy" he referred to are, and the sooner they're gone the better. With regard to the Senior players who are not happy, you are getting premiership wages to sit on your butts and to be brutally honest, you are average to downright mediocre in some cases, and if you want away in January, feel free to go. I very much doubt the big clubs are going to be hammering at the door to get most of you, but all the best and thank you for your contribution over the years is all I have to say to you. HUGHES IN.[/p][/quote]In what capacity can Shaw or Agnew make money from any transfer dealings exactly?[/p][/quote]You've never heard of a kickback? :/[/p][/quote]Yesterday you asked me if I had any proof/evidence to back-up my OPINIONS, accused fellow fans of stirring up hatred and scoffed at them for believing everything the papers print. Yet, here you are saying that Shaw and Agnew are getting kick-backs from player transfers. Hmmm, I'm sure you know what's coming next but I'll ask you anyway: do you have any proof or evidence to substantiate your claims?[/p][/quote]I'm not saying they are. I asked a question. A valid one, since its all everyone has said about the set up after Kean was installed and players sold off and cheapos brought in. Its not exactly a breaking story or news that fans have questioned agents involvement .. or did you miss that?[/p][/quote]I suggest you reread what you typed before you try patronising me as that is exactly what you've said.[/p][/quote]I dont need to patronise you srvp, your posts speak for themselves. But just to humour you: "That was the last straw.." Really Derek? Haven't heard an awful lot from you or that other Anderson stooge up to now. What happened? Singh taking all your power away to continue stealing money from the club via your dodgy agent dealings spoiled your plans? " FYI, the "?" at the end is called a question mark, used for denoting that a question is being asked. Now THAT's patronising. Feel free to argue about the merits of the question but maybe tomorrow when the word of the day toilet paper brings a new word.[/p][/quote]So that's twice you've tried to patronise me and twice you've failed. "Singh taking all your power away to continue stealing money from the club via your dodgy agent dealings spoiled your plans?" Yes, it's a question but it still contains the premise that you believe them to be taking kickbacks from underhand dealings. If you'd asked, "WERE you stealing money from the club before Singh came along, etc..." then it becomes a question without any personal beliefs attached to it. I hope you've got some Aloe Vera to hand because you just got burned![/p][/quote]I just figured out tomorrows word of the day for you srvp.. its pedantic. Also how old are you? Burned? Hmm... 28 should be an age of maturity.. but people mature at different rates I suppose. Do yourself a favour, read back through both our posts and come back when you figure out what was wrong with the conversation. Till then I'll just assume your petulance is due to some need of attention, which clearly from your posts is telling.[/p][/quote]If you try to patronise someone they are well within their rights to correct you without being called pedantic. for starters ut doesnt fit in with the context or thread of the conversation. Just because you try to make other people look stupid it doesn't mean you're always right. You tried to belittle me, like you do everyone else on here, but you ended up making yourself look stupid. Trying to make out that I'm juvenile because I used the word 'burned', or making out that I'm intellectually inferior to you by referencing 'Word of the Day' toilet paper is not only desperate but also very sad. Even if either were true, which they're not, it still doesn't detract from the fact that your patronising was premature. If anything, It would have been better if I was juvenile and stupid, it would make your humbling all the better. I've reread our conversation and there's nothing in there to convince me that I was wrong. All I've learned is that you're so hell bent on being right all the time that when you're wrong you try and detract from other people's arguments by insulting them and insinuating that they're not as intelligent as you. I dare say that this is where you'll type something along the lines of, 'I don't have to insinuate anything, your posts prove my point'. Or something equally as childish. Just for the record, 28 isn't my age, so I guess that's another thing you were wrong about. Not that age has a direct correlation to intelligence. It doesn't matter what insults you come back with, and you will, it won't change the fact that you had the smug grin wiped off your face for a change. Even if you won't admit it, anybody who reads this thread will know it. Perhaps one of your resolutions should be to stop exerting your self-importance over your fellow fans. Don't waste my time again. Happy New Year.[/p][/quote]I wont bother requoting as its annoying but actually the only word that came to mind was YAWN. Jesus how boring was that post? it reminded me of Shebby's how to waffle and say nothing of real importance. Maybe I'll reread it at midnight if I'm having trouble sleeping. srvp, I honestly wouldn't know where to start with your posts. you seemingly only to want to pick fights to prove pointless points to the point, that the point itself is lost. Its new years eve. Lighten up and go have drink. I don't know which is worse, you for your boring the pants off me or me replying back to you. And yes. Happy New Year to you too.[/p][/quote]My posts are boring and I'm only interested in picking fights? Hmmm, 'pot, kettle, black' definitely springs to mind, especially seeing as how it was you who got on my case yesterday. All I was doing today was pointing out the hypocrisy in your posts. You're still doing it on another page. I suggest you take your own advice and lighten up yourself. srvp28
  • Score: 0

11:34pm Mon 31 Dec 12

goldfinger59 says...

http://www.pastemaga
zine.com/articles/20
12/09/groucho-marxs-
hilarious-letter-of-
apology-to-woody.htm
l
http://www.pastemaga zine.com/articles/20 12/09/groucho-marxs- hilarious-letter-of- apology-to-woody.htm l goldfinger59
  • Score: 0

12:54am Tue 1 Jan 13

dallydally says...

Shebby is a prat. Tomorrow will come and go with no news of a Manager. All he does is manipulate supporters for his own ego. It was a sad day when this idiot was appointed.
Shebby is a prat. Tomorrow will come and go with no news of a Manager. All he does is manipulate supporters for his own ego. It was a sad day when this idiot was appointed. dallydally
  • Score: 0

6:15am Tue 1 Jan 13

yellow man says...

sonny wrote:
More Anti-Shebby Singh propaganda from Paul Agnew & Derek Shaw doing the rounds this weekend in the tabloids, Agnew&Shaw are the really poison at BRFC any fan that does a little research(other than reading the tabloids) knows that. Singh's a nutter but his heart seems to be in the right place, Shebbys just very misguided because his so-called Colleagues have being playing him from day one(just like they have been playing the venkys from day 1 of there take-over).
Absolutely correct but not forgetting Anderson with Messrs Agnew and Shaw but we must support the club at games to lift the players. We must try and support their efforts during matches and only call for these three to leave after the final whistle.
[quote][p][bold]sonny[/bold] wrote: More Anti-Shebby Singh propaganda from Paul Agnew & Derek Shaw doing the rounds this weekend in the tabloids, Agnew&Shaw are the really poison at BRFC any fan that does a little research(other than reading the tabloids) knows that. Singh's a nutter but his heart seems to be in the right place, Shebbys just very misguided because his so-called Colleagues have being playing him from day one(just like they have been playing the venkys from day 1 of there take-over).[/p][/quote]Absolutely correct but not forgetting Anderson with Messrs Agnew and Shaw but we must support the club at games to lift the players. We must try and support their efforts during matches and only call for these three to leave after the final whistle. yellow man
  • Score: 0

8:41am Tue 1 Jan 13

BRFC75 says...

srvp28 wrote:
peely wrote:
srvp28 wrote:
blueblooded wrote:
edmy wrote:
Read the latest from the Daily Mail We have a contagious disease at Ewood it is called the Venkys. all it touches are doomed.
"THE VENKYS" They sacked Sam, They appointed Kean, They got rid of a fantastic Board and several other prominent office staff. They presided over the removal of several senior players. They appointed Shebby. Who else is there to blame. If the don't sell soon we won't have a club worth jacks**t to sell.
Revealed: From boardroom split to player revolt, the inside story of crisis engulfing Blackburn

Senior players revolt after poor start to season
Derek Shaw wants controversial Shebby Singh out
Club no closer to naming successor to Henning Berg


Read more: http://www.dailymail





.co.uk/sport/footbal





l/article-2255191/Bl





ackburn-Rovers-crisi





s-players-revolt-She





bby-Singh
Seriously?

You call that inside story?

Every man and his dog knows senior players were not impressed with Berg's appointment and the Daily Fail's exclusive already tells you who spun THAT leak.

"Shaw, An experienced administrator.. "

"That was the last straw.." Really Derek? Haven't heard an awful lot from you or that other Anderson stooge up to now. What happened? Singh taking all your power away to continue stealing money from the club via your dodgy agent dealings spoiled your plans?

As Sonny said, Singh may be a lot of things, but stripping the club of its assets isnt one of them. His ambitions are much less sinister - small comfort that it is - but it's becoming very apparent now who the "enemy" he referred to are, and the sooner they're gone the better.

With regard to the Senior players who are not happy, you are getting premiership wages to sit on your butts and to be brutally honest, you are average to downright mediocre in some cases, and if you want away in January, feel free to go. I very much doubt the big clubs are going to be hammering at the door to get most of you, but all the best and thank you for your contribution over the years is all I have to say to you.

HUGHES IN.
In what capacity can Shaw or Agnew make money from any transfer dealings exactly?
"In what capacity can Shaw or Agnew make any money from transfer dealings ". Oh. Per lease , come on - do we really need to spell it out how this agent / club employee bung works ! The whole scenario stinks from top to bottom , it's now just a case of who can make the most before the ship goes t"st up ! And the mug paying fans left in the lurch while greedy players/ agents /senior management move on to pastures new with their pockets filled not to mention foreign bank accounts!
Don't talk to me like I'm a simpleton, I'm well aware of the amount of corruption in some sports. However, seeing as you have no proof of this I don't think you should be making those accusations. Just because you don't like someone it doesn't mean they're on the take.

It's almost as ridiculous as those people saying that Hendry is only being kept on because he owes money to someone from the Walker Trust. This is the same Walker Trust, I assume, who sold the club to Venky's over two years ago, long before Hendry was hired?

There's far too many people on here who want to believe that the club is rotten to the core just because they don't like the initial influence Jerome Anderson had at the club. These same people will try to convince you that he still has some influence, despite Venky's saying he doesn't.
Think if you have a look at Hendry`s creditors when he went bankrupt , he owed Howard Walker 150 ,000 pounds NOT the Walker trust ,this was a personal loan from Howard Walker to Hendry ,Hendry went bankrupt owing him this money, so as Coar a close friend of Howard Walker simlpy organised the job as a means to pay Walker his money back, obviously it is illegal, to pay back a preferred unsecured creditor it is against the law but it happens all the time, also Coar is a Burnley fan and tried to get on the board there years ago, so try and get your facts right before commenting.
[quote][p][bold]srvp28[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]peely[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]srvp28[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]blueblooded[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]edmy[/bold] wrote: Read the latest from the Daily Mail We have a contagious disease at Ewood it is called the Venkys. all it touches are doomed. "THE VENKYS" They sacked Sam, They appointed Kean, They got rid of a fantastic Board and several other prominent office staff. They presided over the removal of several senior players. They appointed Shebby. Who else is there to blame. If the don't sell soon we won't have a club worth jacks**t to sell. Revealed: From boardroom split to player revolt, the inside story of crisis engulfing Blackburn Senior players revolt after poor start to season Derek Shaw wants controversial Shebby Singh out Club no closer to naming successor to Henning Berg Read more: http://www.dailymail .co.uk/sport/footbal l/article-2255191/Bl ackburn-Rovers-crisi s-players-revolt-She bby-Singh[/p][/quote]Seriously? You call that inside story? Every man and his dog knows senior players were not impressed with Berg's appointment and the Daily Fail's exclusive already tells you who spun THAT leak. "Shaw, An experienced administrator.. " "That was the last straw.." Really Derek? Haven't heard an awful lot from you or that other Anderson stooge up to now. What happened? Singh taking all your power away to continue stealing money from the club via your dodgy agent dealings spoiled your plans? As Sonny said, Singh may be a lot of things, but stripping the club of its assets isnt one of them. His ambitions are much less sinister - small comfort that it is - but it's becoming very apparent now who the "enemy" he referred to are, and the sooner they're gone the better. With regard to the Senior players who are not happy, you are getting premiership wages to sit on your butts and to be brutally honest, you are average to downright mediocre in some cases, and if you want away in January, feel free to go. I very much doubt the big clubs are going to be hammering at the door to get most of you, but all the best and thank you for your contribution over the years is all I have to say to you. HUGHES IN.[/p][/quote]In what capacity can Shaw or Agnew make money from any transfer dealings exactly?[/p][/quote]"In what capacity can Shaw or Agnew make any money from transfer dealings ". Oh. Per lease , come on - do we really need to spell it out how this agent / club employee bung works ! The whole scenario stinks from top to bottom , it's now just a case of who can make the most before the ship goes t"st up ! And the mug paying fans left in the lurch while greedy players/ agents /senior management move on to pastures new with their pockets filled not to mention foreign bank accounts![/p][/quote]Don't talk to me like I'm a simpleton, I'm well aware of the amount of corruption in some sports. However, seeing as you have no proof of this I don't think you should be making those accusations. Just because you don't like someone it doesn't mean they're on the take. It's almost as ridiculous as those people saying that Hendry is only being kept on because he owes money to someone from the Walker Trust. This is the same Walker Trust, I assume, who sold the club to Venky's over two years ago, long before Hendry was hired? There's far too many people on here who want to believe that the club is rotten to the core just because they don't like the initial influence Jerome Anderson had at the club. These same people will try to convince you that he still has some influence, despite Venky's saying he doesn't.[/p][/quote]Think if you have a look at Hendry`s creditors when he went bankrupt , he owed Howard Walker 150 ,000 pounds NOT the Walker trust ,this was a personal loan from Howard Walker to Hendry ,Hendry went bankrupt owing him this money, so as Coar a close friend of Howard Walker simlpy organised the job as a means to pay Walker his money back, obviously it is illegal, to pay back a preferred unsecured creditor it is against the law but it happens all the time, also Coar is a Burnley fan and tried to get on the board there years ago, so try and get your facts right before commenting. BRFC75
  • Score: 0

10:24am Tue 1 Jan 13

owd nick says...

wilyrover wrote:
Shebby Singh is merely a puppet on a string. He took pelters for the delay in appointing Berg and now he is going to rush in and announce the Norwegians successor in a sop to the supporters. The man hasn't a clue. He is delusional, misguided and completely out of his depth. It's time for him to return to the warmth of a TV studio. However judging by his interview on 606, he's not good at that either. The man doesn't even seem to know what his job entails and now he has reputedly alienated Derek Shaw and Paul Agnew. He is a loose cannon and needs to leave the club now.
Come on, you love him really! :-)

Happy new year to all who care about Rovers, everyone who takes the time to post on here does that in spades or they wouldn't bother, we may not agree with each other all of the time but we are all true fans.

In reality there is nowt we can do about the situation at Ewood apart from getting behind the players and coaching staff against a decent Forest side this afternoon and praying for a win.

With Shebby, Shaw and Agnew playing "My dick is bigger than yours" and Venky's burying their heads in chicken manure as usual I suspect the bumpy ride we have experienced for the last two years isn't over by a long chalk.

I am actually looking forward to getting down to Ewood today, either I haven't sobered up yet or the Valium has kicked in :-)
[quote][p][bold]wilyrover[/bold] wrote: Shebby Singh is merely a puppet on a string. He took pelters for the delay in appointing Berg and now he is going to rush in and announce the Norwegians successor in a sop to the supporters. The man hasn't a clue. He is delusional, misguided and completely out of his depth. It's time for him to return to the warmth of a TV studio. However judging by his interview on 606, he's not good at that either. The man doesn't even seem to know what his job entails and now he has reputedly alienated Derek Shaw and Paul Agnew. He is a loose cannon and needs to leave the club now.[/p][/quote]Come on, you love him really! :-) Happy new year to all who care about Rovers, everyone who takes the time to post on here does that in spades or they wouldn't bother, we may not agree with each other all of the time but we are all true fans. In reality there is nowt we can do about the situation at Ewood apart from getting behind the players and coaching staff against a decent Forest side this afternoon and praying for a win. With Shebby, Shaw and Agnew playing "My dick is bigger than yours" and Venky's burying their heads in chicken manure as usual I suspect the bumpy ride we have experienced for the last two years isn't over by a long chalk. I am actually looking forward to getting down to Ewood today, either I haven't sobered up yet or the Valium has kicked in :-) owd nick
  • Score: 0

10:24am Tue 1 Jan 13

Dan11 says...

Ok, Shabby Minge the clock is ticking and we are waiting for our new manager to be announced!
I hope you are not the kind of man to make promises you cannot keep Shabby because that would make us all very disappointed.
I calculate we have only about 10 hours now of today UK Time for you to pull something out of your box of frogs.
Ok, Shabby Minge the clock is ticking and we are waiting for our new manager to be announced! I hope you are not the kind of man to make promises you cannot keep Shabby because that would make us all very disappointed. I calculate we have only about 10 hours now of today UK Time for you to pull something out of your box of frogs. Dan11
  • Score: 0

10:26am Tue 1 Jan 13

moh says...

yellow man wrote:
sonny wrote:
More Anti-Shebby Singh propaganda from Paul Agnew & Derek Shaw doing the rounds this weekend in the tabloids, Agnew&Shaw are the really poison at BRFC any fan that does a little research(other than reading the tabloids) knows that. Singh's a nutter but his heart seems to be in the right place, Shebbys just very misguided because his so-called Colleagues have being playing him from day one(just like they have been playing the venkys from day 1 of there take-over).
Absolutely correct but not forgetting Anderson with Messrs Agnew and Shaw but we must support the club at games to lift the players. We must try and support their efforts during matches and only call for these three to leave after the final whistle.
some sensible posts, cheer the lads today for a positive results, hope there are no arguments between fans at match and we can watch the game in good atmosphere,
[quote][p][bold]yellow man[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]sonny[/bold] wrote: More Anti-Shebby Singh propaganda from Paul Agnew & Derek Shaw doing the rounds this weekend in the tabloids, Agnew&Shaw are the really poison at BRFC any fan that does a little research(other than reading the tabloids) knows that. Singh's a nutter but his heart seems to be in the right place, Shebbys just very misguided because his so-called Colleagues have being playing him from day one(just like they have been playing the venkys from day 1 of there take-over).[/p][/quote]Absolutely correct but not forgetting Anderson with Messrs Agnew and Shaw but we must support the club at games to lift the players. We must try and support their efforts during matches and only call for these three to leave after the final whistle.[/p][/quote]some sensible posts, cheer the lads today for a positive results, hope there are no arguments between fans at match and we can watch the game in good atmosphere, moh
  • Score: 0

10:30am Tue 1 Jan 13

owd nick says...

yellow man wrote:
sonny wrote:
More Anti-Shebby Singh propaganda from Paul Agnew & Derek Shaw doing the rounds this weekend in the tabloids, Agnew&Shaw are the really poison at BRFC any fan that does a little research(other than reading the tabloids) knows that. Singh's a nutter but his heart seems to be in the right place, Shebbys just very misguided because his so-called Colleagues have being playing him from day one(just like they have been playing the venkys from day 1 of there take-over).
Absolutely correct but not forgetting Anderson with Messrs Agnew and Shaw but we must support the club at games to lift the players. We must try and support their efforts during matches and only call for these three to leave after the final whistle.
Agreed, we can't go back to the bear-pit days of last season, the players confidence is pretty low and any negative reaction from the crowd during the game could cost us points, just as it did last season.

Lets support the players and coaching staff then make our feelings felt about the idiots in charge after the game.
[quote][p][bold]yellow man[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]sonny[/bold] wrote: More Anti-Shebby Singh propaganda from Paul Agnew & Derek Shaw doing the rounds this weekend in the tabloids, Agnew&Shaw are the really poison at BRFC any fan that does a little research(other than reading the tabloids) knows that. Singh's a nutter but his heart seems to be in the right place, Shebbys just very misguided because his so-called Colleagues have being playing him from day one(just like they have been playing the venkys from day 1 of there take-over).[/p][/quote]Absolutely correct but not forgetting Anderson with Messrs Agnew and Shaw but we must support the club at games to lift the players. We must try and support their efforts during matches and only call for these three to leave after the final whistle.[/p][/quote]Agreed, we can't go back to the bear-pit days of last season, the players confidence is pretty low and any negative reaction from the crowd during the game could cost us points, just as it did last season. Lets support the players and coaching staff then make our feelings felt about the idiots in charge after the game. owd nick
  • Score: 0

10:38am Tue 1 Jan 13

whappen says...

Is Eckersley playing? wrote:
How can Singh give the Indians a list of his preferred candidates for Madam to make a decision and what will her decision be based on? Blind leading the blind. Surely the FA or the football league should be calling for an explanation from the clowns. And what about Taylor of the Players Union. Not a word. Is he looking after his members interests, nit to mention him being a so-called pseudo Rovers fan. Does no-one out there care?
It most certainly is the blind leading the blind, not to mention the deaf and the stupid.

The FA or Football League can't and won't investigate how a club is being managed; that is the owners' prerogative. Venkys will say they have acted as they saw fit and can point to spending a shed load of cash on transfers and wages as proof they are not "asset stripping" as has been suggested on here countless times.

They have appointed Singh as some kind of b@st@rd offspring of a Director of Football and CEO. Sadly he is grossly under qualified for either, let alone a combination of the two.

Peter Scudamore said there are only so many things the fit and proper test can consider; the owners turning out to be f@cking useless is not one of them.

As for Taylor; he is the highest paid union official in history. The operative word there is "union". He represents the well being of his members and the disproportionatly high wages some of Rovers' players "earn" would not seem a reason for him or the PFA to have any cause for concern. Their interests are being looked after quite nicely thanks very much without him having to stick his nose in.

Who knows who the villains are? Singh shouldn't be within a million miles of Ewood whilst Agnew is grossly underqualified and Shaw a proven failure at PNE. They would all seem bizarre appointments until you realise how they all got their jobs in the first place. Venkys had no idea who to give Singh's job apart from Singh himself whilst the other two were promoted and appointed resp. on the say so of Kean. He was forced out by Singh, allegedly, so there is little wonder there are serious ructions within the club.

Ultimately Venkys are the ignorant and inept villains although the others have played leading roles in the farce.
[quote][p][bold]Is Eckersley playing?[/bold] wrote: How can Singh give the Indians a list of his preferred candidates for Madam to make a decision and what will her decision be based on? Blind leading the blind. Surely the FA or the football league should be calling for an explanation from the clowns. And what about Taylor of the Players Union. Not a word. Is he looking after his members interests, nit to mention him being a so-called pseudo Rovers fan. Does no-one out there care?[/p][/quote]It most certainly is the blind leading the blind, not to mention the deaf and the stupid. The FA or Football League can't and won't investigate how a club is being managed; that is the owners' prerogative. Venkys will say they have acted as they saw fit and can point to spending a shed load of cash on transfers and wages as proof they are not "asset stripping" as has been suggested on here countless times. They have appointed Singh as some kind of b@st@rd offspring of a Director of Football and CEO. Sadly he is grossly under qualified for either, let alone a combination of the two. Peter Scudamore said there are only so many things the fit and proper test can consider; the owners turning out to be f@cking useless is not one of them. As for Taylor; he is the highest paid union official in history. The operative word there is "union". He represents the well being of his members and the disproportionatly high wages some of Rovers' players "earn" would not seem a reason for him or the PFA to have any cause for concern. Their interests are being looked after quite nicely thanks very much without him having to stick his nose in. Who knows who the villains are? Singh shouldn't be within a million miles of Ewood whilst Agnew is grossly underqualified and Shaw a proven failure at PNE. They would all seem bizarre appointments until you realise how they all got their jobs in the first place. Venkys had no idea who to give Singh's job apart from Singh himself whilst the other two were promoted and appointed resp. on the say so of Kean. He was forced out by Singh, allegedly, so there is little wonder there are serious ructions within the club. Ultimately Venkys are the ignorant and inept villains although the others have played leading roles in the farce. whappen
  • Score: 0

10:42am Tue 1 Jan 13

srvp28 says...

BRFC75 wrote:
srvp28 wrote:
peely wrote:
srvp28 wrote:
blueblooded wrote:
edmy wrote:
Read the latest from the Daily Mail We have a contagious disease at Ewood it is called the Venkys. all it touches are doomed.
"THE VENKYS" They sacked Sam, They appointed Kean, They got rid of a fantastic Board and several other prominent office staff. They presided over the removal of several senior players. They appointed Shebby. Who else is there to blame. If the don't sell soon we won't have a club worth jacks**t to sell.
Revealed: From boardroom split to player revolt, the inside story of crisis engulfing Blackburn

Senior players revolt after poor start to season
Derek Shaw wants controversial Shebby Singh out
Club no closer to naming successor to Henning Berg


Read more: http://www.dailymail






.co.uk/sport/footbal






l/article-2255191/Bl






ackburn-Rovers-crisi






s-players-revolt-She






bby-Singh
Seriously?

You call that inside story?

Every man and his dog knows senior players were not impressed with Berg's appointment and the Daily Fail's exclusive already tells you who spun THAT leak.

"Shaw, An experienced administrator.. "

"That was the last straw.." Really Derek? Haven't heard an awful lot from you or that other Anderson stooge up to now. What happened? Singh taking all your power away to continue stealing money from the club via your dodgy agent dealings spoiled your plans?

As Sonny said, Singh may be a lot of things, but stripping the club of its assets isnt one of them. His ambitions are much less sinister - small comfort that it is - but it's becoming very apparent now who the "enemy" he referred to are, and the sooner they're gone the better.

With regard to the Senior players who are not happy, you are getting premiership wages to sit on your butts and to be brutally honest, you are average to downright mediocre in some cases, and if you want away in January, feel free to go. I very much doubt the big clubs are going to be hammering at the door to get most of you, but all the best and thank you for your contribution over the years is all I have to say to you.

HUGHES IN.
In what capacity can Shaw or Agnew make money from any transfer dealings exactly?
"In what capacity can Shaw or Agnew make any money from transfer dealings ". Oh. Per lease , come on - do we really need to spell it out how this agent / club employee bung works ! The whole scenario stinks from top to bottom , it's now just a case of who can make the most before the ship goes t"st up ! And the mug paying fans left in the lurch while greedy players/ agents /senior management move on to pastures new with their pockets filled not to mention foreign bank accounts!
Don't talk to me like I'm a simpleton, I'm well aware of the amount of corruption in some sports. However, seeing as you have no proof of this I don't think you should be making those accusations. Just because you don't like someone it doesn't mean they're on the take.

It's almost as ridiculous as those people saying that Hendry is only being kept on because he owes money to someone from the Walker Trust. This is the same Walker Trust, I assume, who sold the club to Venky's over two years ago, long before Hendry was hired?

There's far too many people on here who want to believe that the club is rotten to the core just because they don't like the initial influence Jerome Anderson had at the club. These same people will try to convince you that he still has some influence, despite Venky's saying he doesn't.
Think if you have a look at Hendry`s creditors when he went bankrupt , he owed Howard Walker 150 ,000 pounds NOT the Walker trust ,this was a personal loan from Howard Walker to Hendry ,Hendry went bankrupt owing him this money, so as Coar a close friend of Howard Walker simlpy organised the job as a means to pay Walker his money back, obviously it is illegal, to pay back a preferred unsecured creditor it is against the law but it happens all the time, also Coar is a Burnley fan and tried to get on the board there years ago, so try and get your facts right before commenting.
Reread what I wrote and you'll see that I never said Hendry owed the Walkers Trust money, I said there are people on here who say it. Get your facts right before commenting.
[quote][p][bold]BRFC75[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]srvp28[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]peely[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]srvp28[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]blueblooded[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]edmy[/bold] wrote: Read the latest from the Daily Mail We have a contagious disease at Ewood it is called the Venkys. all it touches are doomed. "THE VENKYS" They sacked Sam, They appointed Kean, They got rid of a fantastic Board and several other prominent office staff. They presided over the removal of several senior players. They appointed Shebby. Who else is there to blame. If the don't sell soon we won't have a club worth jacks**t to sell. Revealed: From boardroom split to player revolt, the inside story of crisis engulfing Blackburn Senior players revolt after poor start to season Derek Shaw wants controversial Shebby Singh out Club no closer to naming successor to Henning Berg Read more: http://www.dailymail .co.uk/sport/footbal l/article-2255191/Bl ackburn-Rovers-crisi s-players-revolt-She bby-Singh[/p][/quote]Seriously? You call that inside story? Every man and his dog knows senior players were not impressed with Berg's appointment and the Daily Fail's exclusive already tells you who spun THAT leak. "Shaw, An experienced administrator.. " "That was the last straw.." Really Derek? Haven't heard an awful lot from you or that other Anderson stooge up to now. What happened? Singh taking all your power away to continue stealing money from the club via your dodgy agent dealings spoiled your plans? As Sonny said, Singh may be a lot of things, but stripping the club of its assets isnt one of them. His ambitions are much less sinister - small comfort that it is - but it's becoming very apparent now who the "enemy" he referred to are, and the sooner they're gone the better. With regard to the Senior players who are not happy, you are getting premiership wages to sit on your butts and to be brutally honest, you are average to downright mediocre in some cases, and if you want away in January, feel free to go. I very much doubt the big clubs are going to be hammering at the door to get most of you, but all the best and thank you for your contribution over the years is all I have to say to you. HUGHES IN.[/p][/quote]In what capacity can Shaw or Agnew make money from any transfer dealings exactly?[/p][/quote]"In what capacity can Shaw or Agnew make any money from transfer dealings ". Oh. Per lease , come on - do we really need to spell it out how this agent / club employee bung works ! The whole scenario stinks from top to bottom , it's now just a case of who can make the most before the ship goes t"st up ! And the mug paying fans left in the lurch while greedy players/ agents /senior management move on to pastures new with their pockets filled not to mention foreign bank accounts![/p][/quote]Don't talk to me like I'm a simpleton, I'm well aware of the amount of corruption in some sports. However, seeing as you have no proof of this I don't think you should be making those accusations. Just because you don't like someone it doesn't mean they're on the take. It's almost as ridiculous as those people saying that Hendry is only being kept on because he owes money to someone from the Walker Trust. This is the same Walker Trust, I assume, who sold the club to Venky's over two years ago, long before Hendry was hired? There's far too many people on here who want to believe that the club is rotten to the core just because they don't like the initial influence Jerome Anderson had at the club. These same people will try to convince you that he still has some influence, despite Venky's saying he doesn't.[/p][/quote]Think if you have a look at Hendry`s creditors when he went bankrupt , he owed Howard Walker 150 ,000 pounds NOT the Walker trust ,this was a personal loan from Howard Walker to Hendry ,Hendry went bankrupt owing him this money, so as Coar a close friend of Howard Walker simlpy organised the job as a means to pay Walker his money back, obviously it is illegal, to pay back a preferred unsecured creditor it is against the law but it happens all the time, also Coar is a Burnley fan and tried to get on the board there years ago, so try and get your facts right before commenting.[/p][/quote]Reread what I wrote and you'll see that I never said Hendry owed the Walkers Trust money, I said there are people on here who say it. Get your facts right before commenting. srvp28
  • Score: 0

10:49am Tue 1 Jan 13

whappen says...

Captain Dreckley wrote:
Rover Pete wrote: Has anybody a clue as to what Venky's are trying to do with Rovers? They have not done one single thing right. How on earth did this shower end up so called millionaires? It must be very easy to make money in India. The farce still goes on. Singh is obviously crazy and totally out of his depth but Venky's still trust him and think he can walk on water. We are going down to League 1 - no question. But why, oh why, are Venky's so happy to see it happen? There is nothing in it for them, is there? Now it looks as though Givet, Pederson, Dunn and Robinson are going to be sold in January. Another bad move and a downwards step. Do Venky's know or care how stupid they have made themselves and the few supporters (myself included!) that are still left going to matches?
Venkys didn't buy Rovers for the love of the game or club, they bought it to introduce the Venkys brand to a Europe hence the desire to play in the champions league. They anticipated the degree of publicity associated with champions league clubs and that publicity carrying association with the Venkys brand. Get the brand known in Europe and the UK then introduce the chicken shops. Venkys have certainly got the publicity but not how they expected. I think a certain Colonel can sleep soundly at night not fearing competition from this lot. What has transpired is that Venkys have done a Ratner ( anyone remember Gerald Ratner???)
Yes I do. Venkys have gone one better though in that everybody knows we're sh!t without them having to state the obvious.
[quote][p][bold]Captain Dreckley[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Rover Pete[/bold] wrote: Has anybody a clue as to what Venky's are trying to do with Rovers? They have not done one single thing right. How on earth did this shower end up so called millionaires? It must be very easy to make money in India. The farce still goes on. Singh is obviously crazy and totally out of his depth but Venky's still trust him and think he can walk on water. We are going down to League 1 - no question. But why, oh why, are Venky's so happy to see it happen? There is nothing in it for them, is there? Now it looks as though Givet, Pederson, Dunn and Robinson are going to be sold in January. Another bad move and a downwards step. Do Venky's know or care how stupid they have made themselves and the few supporters (myself included!) that are still left going to matches?[/p][/quote]Venkys didn't buy Rovers for the love of the game or club, they bought it to introduce the Venkys brand to a Europe hence the desire to play in the champions league. They anticipated the degree of publicity associated with champions league clubs and that publicity carrying association with the Venkys brand. Get the brand known in Europe and the UK then introduce the chicken shops. Venkys have certainly got the publicity but not how they expected. I think a certain Colonel can sleep soundly at night not fearing competition from this lot. What has transpired is that Venkys have done a Ratner ( anyone remember Gerald Ratner???)[/p][/quote]Yes I do. Venkys have gone one better though in that everybody knows we're sh!t without them having to state the obvious. whappen
  • Score: 0

11:57am Tue 1 Jan 13

hornbypeggy says...

I agree with the lions share of comments , but I have 2 points

1 Continue writing on here EFFECTIVENESS = NIL
2 Vote with your feet EFFECTIVENESS =ACTION WILL BE TAKEN
I agree with the lions share of comments , but I have 2 points 1 Continue writing on here EFFECTIVENESS = NIL 2 Vote with your feet EFFECTIVENESS =ACTION WILL BE TAKEN hornbypeggy
  • Score: 0

12:17pm Tue 1 Jan 13

BRFC75 says...

srvp28 wrote:
BRFC75 wrote:
srvp28 wrote:
peely wrote:
srvp28 wrote:
blueblooded wrote:
edmy wrote:
Read the latest from the Daily Mail We have a contagious disease at Ewood it is called the Venkys. all it touches are doomed.
"THE VENKYS" They sacked Sam, They appointed Kean, They got rid of a fantastic Board and several other prominent office staff. They presided over the removal of several senior players. They appointed Shebby. Who else is there to blame. If the don't sell soon we won't have a club worth jacks**t to sell.
Revealed: From boardroom split to player revolt, the inside story of crisis engulfing Blackburn

Senior players revolt after poor start to season
Derek Shaw wants controversial Shebby Singh out
Club no closer to naming successor to Henning Berg


Read more: http://www.dailymail







.co.uk/sport/footbal







l/article-2255191/Bl







ackburn-Rovers-crisi







s-players-revolt-She







bby-Singh
Seriously?

You call that inside story?

Every man and his dog knows senior players were not impressed with Berg's appointment and the Daily Fail's exclusive already tells you who spun THAT leak.

"Shaw, An experienced administrator.. "

"That was the last straw.." Really Derek? Haven't heard an awful lot from you or that other Anderson stooge up to now. What happened? Singh taking all your power away to continue stealing money from the club via your dodgy agent dealings spoiled your plans?

As Sonny said, Singh may be a lot of things, but stripping the club of its assets isnt one of them. His ambitions are much less sinister - small comfort that it is - but it's becoming very apparent now who the "enemy" he referred to are, and the sooner they're gone the better.

With regard to the Senior players who are not happy, you are getting premiership wages to sit on your butts and to be brutally honest, you are average to downright mediocre in some cases, and if you want away in January, feel free to go. I very much doubt the big clubs are going to be hammering at the door to get most of you, but all the best and thank you for your contribution over the years is all I have to say to you.

HUGHES IN.
In what capacity can Shaw or Agnew make money from any transfer dealings exactly?
"In what capacity can Shaw or Agnew make any money from transfer dealings ". Oh. Per lease , come on - do we really need to spell it out how this agent / club employee bung works ! The whole scenario stinks from top to bottom , it's now just a case of who can make the most before the ship goes t"st up ! And the mug paying fans left in the lurch while greedy players/ agents /senior management move on to pastures new with their pockets filled not to mention foreign bank accounts!
Don't talk to me like I'm a simpleton, I'm well aware of the amount of corruption in some sports. However, seeing as you have no proof of this I don't think you should be making those accusations. Just because you don't like someone it doesn't mean they're on the take.

It's almost as ridiculous as those people saying that Hendry is only being kept on because he owes money to someone from the Walker Trust. This is the same Walker Trust, I assume, who sold the club to Venky's over two years ago, long before Hendry was hired?

There's far too many people on here who want to believe that the club is rotten to the core just because they don't like the initial influence Jerome Anderson had at the club. These same people will try to convince you that he still has some influence, despite Venky's saying he doesn't.
Think if you have a look at Hendry`s creditors when he went bankrupt , he owed Howard Walker 150 ,000 pounds NOT the Walker trust ,this was a personal loan from Howard Walker to Hendry ,Hendry went bankrupt owing him this money, so as Coar a close friend of Howard Walker simlpy organised the job as a means to pay Walker his money back, obviously it is illegal, to pay back a preferred unsecured creditor it is against the law but it happens all the time, also Coar is a Burnley fan and tried to get on the board there years ago, so try and get your facts right before commenting.
Reread what I wrote and you'll see that I never said Hendry owed the Walkers Trust money, I said there are people on here who say it. Get your facts right before commenting.
NO srvp28 YOUR THE ONLY PERSON THAT WROTE HENDRY OWED THE WALKER TRUST, AND ALSO YOU MOCKED THE PEOPLE WHO COMMENTED ON THE CUNNING SCHEME THAT HAS BEEN SET UP TO PAY BACK HOWARD WALKER..

HENDRY OWED/OWES HOWARD WALKER 150,000 POUNDS FOR A PERSONAL LOAN HE GOT FROM H.WALKER A FEW MONTHS BEFORE HENDRY WENT BANKRUPT .

THE PLOT IS THAT HENDRY GOT THE JOB AT ROVERS SO WALKER COULD GET HIS MONEY BACK FROM HENDRY`S WAGES HENCE THE 8,000 POUNDS A WEEK FOR THE ASSISTANT COACH TO THE RESERVE TEAM ,A MASSIVE SALARY TO PAY A MAN DOING HIS JOB SHOULD BE ABOUT 8,000 POUNDS A WEEK, HIGHLY ILLEGAL BUT STILL QUITE AN OBVIOUS ASSUMPTION.
[quote][p][bold]srvp28[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]BRFC75[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]srvp28[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]peely[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]srvp28[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]blueblooded[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]edmy[/bold] wrote: Read the latest from the Daily Mail We have a contagious disease at Ewood it is called the Venkys. all it touches are doomed. "THE VENKYS" They sacked Sam, They appointed Kean, They got rid of a fantastic Board and several other prominent office staff. They presided over the removal of several senior players. They appointed Shebby. Who else is there to blame. If the don't sell soon we won't have a club worth jacks**t to sell. Revealed: From boardroom split to player revolt, the inside story of crisis engulfing Blackburn Senior players revolt after poor start to season Derek Shaw wants controversial Shebby Singh out Club no closer to naming successor to Henning Berg Read more: http://www.dailymail .co.uk/sport/footbal l/article-2255191/Bl ackburn-Rovers-crisi s-players-revolt-She bby-Singh[/p][/quote]Seriously? You call that inside story? Every man and his dog knows senior players were not impressed with Berg's appointment and the Daily Fail's exclusive already tells you who spun THAT leak. "Shaw, An experienced administrator.. " "That was the last straw.." Really Derek? Haven't heard an awful lot from you or that other Anderson stooge up to now. What happened? Singh taking all your power away to continue stealing money from the club via your dodgy agent dealings spoiled your plans? As Sonny said, Singh may be a lot of things, but stripping the club of its assets isnt one of them. His ambitions are much less sinister - small comfort that it is - but it's becoming very apparent now who the "enemy" he referred to are, and the sooner they're gone the better. With regard to the Senior players who are not happy, you are getting premiership wages to sit on your butts and to be brutally honest, you are average to downright mediocre in some cases, and if you want away in January, feel free to go. I very much doubt the big clubs are going to be hammering at the door to get most of you, but all the best and thank you for your contribution over the years is all I have to say to you. HUGHES IN.[/p][/quote]In what capacity can Shaw or Agnew make money from any transfer dealings exactly?[/p][/quote]"In what capacity can Shaw or Agnew make any money from transfer dealings ". Oh. Per lease , come on - do we really need to spell it out how this agent / club employee bung works ! The whole scenario stinks from top to bottom , it's now just a case of who can make the most before the ship goes t"st up ! And the mug paying fans left in the lurch while greedy players/ agents /senior management move on to pastures new with their pockets filled not to mention foreign bank accounts![/p][/quote]Don't talk to me like I'm a simpleton, I'm well aware of the amount of corruption in some sports. However, seeing as you have no proof of this I don't think you should be making those accusations. Just because you don't like someone it doesn't mean they're on the take. It's almost as ridiculous as those people saying that Hendry is only being kept on because he owes money to someone from the Walker Trust. This is the same Walker Trust, I assume, who sold the club to Venky's over two years ago, long before Hendry was hired? There's far too many people on here who want to believe that the club is rotten to the core just because they don't like the initial influence Jerome Anderson had at the club. These same people will try to convince you that he still has some influence, despite Venky's saying he doesn't.[/p][/quote]Think if you have a look at Hendry`s creditors when he went bankrupt , he owed Howard Walker 150 ,000 pounds NOT the Walker trust ,this was a personal loan from Howard Walker to Hendry ,Hendry went bankrupt owing him this money, so as Coar a close friend of Howard Walker simlpy organised the job as a means to pay Walker his money back, obviously it is illegal, to pay back a preferred unsecured creditor it is against the law but it happens all the time, also Coar is a Burnley fan and tried to get on the board there years ago, so try and get your facts right before commenting.[/p][/quote]Reread what I wrote and you'll see that I never said Hendry owed the Walkers Trust money, I said there are people on here who say it. Get your facts right before commenting.[/p][/quote]NO srvp28 YOUR THE ONLY PERSON THAT WROTE HENDRY OWED THE WALKER TRUST, AND ALSO YOU MOCKED THE PEOPLE WHO COMMENTED ON THE CUNNING SCHEME THAT HAS BEEN SET UP TO PAY BACK HOWARD WALKER.. HENDRY OWED/OWES HOWARD WALKER 150,000 POUNDS FOR A PERSONAL LOAN HE GOT FROM H.WALKER A FEW MONTHS BEFORE HENDRY WENT BANKRUPT . THE PLOT IS THAT HENDRY GOT THE JOB AT ROVERS SO WALKER COULD GET HIS MONEY BACK FROM HENDRY`S WAGES HENCE THE 8,000 POUNDS A WEEK FOR THE ASSISTANT COACH TO THE RESERVE TEAM ,A MASSIVE SALARY TO PAY A MAN DOING HIS JOB SHOULD BE ABOUT 8,000 POUNDS A WEEK, HIGHLY ILLEGAL BUT STILL QUITE AN OBVIOUS ASSUMPTION. BRFC75
  • Score: 0

12:22pm Tue 1 Jan 13

BRFC75 says...

BRFC75 wrote:
srvp28 wrote:
BRFC75 wrote:
srvp28 wrote:
peely wrote:
srvp28 wrote:
blueblooded wrote:
edmy wrote:
Read the latest from the Daily Mail We have a contagious disease at Ewood it is called the Venkys. all it touches are doomed.
"THE VENKYS" They sacked Sam, They appointed Kean, They got rid of a fantastic Board and several other prominent office staff. They presided over the removal of several senior players. They appointed Shebby. Who else is there to blame. If the don't sell soon we won't have a club worth jacks**t to sell.
Revealed: From boardroom split to player revolt, the inside story of crisis engulfing Blackburn

Senior players revolt after poor start to season
Derek Shaw wants controversial Shebby Singh out
Club no closer to naming successor to Henning Berg


Read more: http://www.dailymail








.co.uk/sport/footbal








l/article-2255191/Bl








ackburn-Rovers-crisi








s-players-revolt-She








bby-Singh
Seriously?

You call that inside story?

Every man and his dog knows senior players were not impressed with Berg's appointment and the Daily Fail's exclusive already tells you who spun THAT leak.

"Shaw, An experienced administrator.. "

"That was the last straw.." Really Derek? Haven't heard an awful lot from you or that other Anderson stooge up to now. What happened? Singh taking all your power away to continue stealing money from the club via your dodgy agent dealings spoiled your plans?

As Sonny said, Singh may be a lot of things, but stripping the club of its assets isnt one of them. His ambitions are much less sinister - small comfort that it is - but it's becoming very apparent now who the "enemy" he referred to are, and the sooner they're gone the better.

With regard to the Senior players who are not happy, you are getting premiership wages to sit on your butts and to be brutally honest, you are average to downright mediocre in some cases, and if you want away in January, feel free to go. I very much doubt the big clubs are going to be hammering at the door to get most of you, but all the best and thank you for your contribution over the years is all I have to say to you.

HUGHES IN.
In what capacity can Shaw or Agnew make money from any transfer dealings exactly?
"In what capacity can Shaw or Agnew make any money from transfer dealings ". Oh. Per lease , come on - do we really need to spell it out how this agent / club employee bung works ! The whole scenario stinks from top to bottom , it's now just a case of who can make the most before the ship goes t"st up ! And the mug paying fans left in the lurch while greedy players/ agents /senior management move on to pastures new with their pockets filled not to mention foreign bank accounts!
Don't talk to me like I'm a simpleton, I'm well aware of the amount of corruption in some sports. However, seeing as you have no proof of this I don't think you should be making those accusations. Just because you don't like someone it doesn't mean they're on the take.

It's almost as ridiculous as those people saying that Hendry is only being kept on because he owes money to someone from the Walker Trust. This is the same Walker Trust, I assume, who sold the club to Venky's over two years ago, long before Hendry was hired?

There's far too many people on here who want to believe that the club is rotten to the core just because they don't like the initial influence Jerome Anderson had at the club. These same people will try to convince you that he still has some influence, despite Venky's saying he doesn't.
Think if you have a look at Hendry`s creditors when he went bankrupt , he owed Howard Walker 150 ,000 pounds NOT the Walker trust ,this was a personal loan from Howard Walker to Hendry ,Hendry went bankrupt owing him this money, so as Coar a close friend of Howard Walker simlpy organised the job as a means to pay Walker his money back, obviously it is illegal, to pay back a preferred unsecured creditor it is against the law but it happens all the time, also Coar is a Burnley fan and tried to get on the board there years ago, so try and get your facts right before commenting.
Reread what I wrote and you'll see that I never said Hendry owed the Walkers Trust money, I said there are people on here who say it. Get your facts right before commenting.
NO srvp28 YOUR THE ONLY PERSON THAT WROTE HENDRY OWED THE WALKER TRUST, AND ALSO YOU MOCKED THE PEOPLE WHO COMMENTED ON THE CUNNING SCHEME THAT HAS BEEN SET UP TO PAY BACK HOWARD WALKER..

HENDRY OWED/OWES HOWARD WALKER 150,000 POUNDS FOR A PERSONAL LOAN HE GOT FROM H.WALKER A FEW MONTHS BEFORE HENDRY WENT BANKRUPT .

THE PLOT IS THAT HENDRY GOT THE JOB AT ROVERS SO WALKER COULD GET HIS MONEY BACK FROM HENDRY`S WAGES HENCE THE 8,000 POUNDS A WEEK FOR THE ASSISTANT COACH TO THE RESERVE TEAM ,A MASSIVE SALARY TO PAY A MAN DOING HIS JOB SHOULD BE ABOUT 8,000 POUNDS A WEEK, HIGHLY ILLEGAL BUT STILL QUITE AN OBVIOUS ASSUMPTION.
THAT SHOULD READ THE ASSISTANT COACH TO THE RESERVES SHOULD EARN A MAXIMUN OF 800 POUNDS A WEEK. NOT 8,000 A WEEK WHICH IT IS WELL DOCUMENTED SOMEHOW OR OTHER HE MANAGES TO GET ROVERS TO PAY HIM , REMEMBER ULTIMATELY THE SUPPORTERS PAY ALL THE WAGES..
[quote][p][bold]BRFC75[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]srvp28[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]BRFC75[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]srvp28[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]peely[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]srvp28[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]blueblooded[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]edmy[/bold] wrote: Read the latest from the Daily Mail We have a contagious disease at Ewood it is called the Venkys. all it touches are doomed. "THE VENKYS" They sacked Sam, They appointed Kean, They got rid of a fantastic Board and several other prominent office staff. They presided over the removal of several senior players. They appointed Shebby. Who else is there to blame. If the don't sell soon we won't have a club worth jacks**t to sell. Revealed: From boardroom split to player revolt, the inside story of crisis engulfing Blackburn Senior players revolt after poor start to season Derek Shaw wants controversial Shebby Singh out Club no closer to naming successor to Henning Berg Read more: http://www.dailymail .co.uk/sport/footbal l/article-2255191/Bl ackburn-Rovers-crisi s-players-revolt-She bby-Singh[/p][/quote]Seriously? You call that inside story? Every man and his dog knows senior players were not impressed with Berg's appointment and the Daily Fail's exclusive already tells you who spun THAT leak. "Shaw, An experienced administrator.. " "That was the last straw.." Really Derek? Haven't heard an awful lot from you or that other Anderson stooge up to now. What happened? Singh taking all your power away to continue stealing money from the club via your dodgy agent dealings spoiled your plans? As Sonny said, Singh may be a lot of things, but stripping the club of its assets isnt one of them. His ambitions are much less sinister - small comfort that it is - but it's becoming very apparent now who the "enemy" he referred to are, and the sooner they're gone the better. With regard to the Senior players who are not happy, you are getting premiership wages to sit on your butts and to be brutally honest, you are average to downright mediocre in some cases, and if you want away in January, feel free to go. I very much doubt the big clubs are going to be hammering at the door to get most of you, but all the best and thank you for your contribution over the years is all I have to say to you. HUGHES IN.[/p][/quote]In what capacity can Shaw or Agnew make money from any transfer dealings exactly?[/p][/quote]"In what capacity can Shaw or Agnew make any money from transfer dealings ". Oh. Per lease , come on - do we really need to spell it out how this agent / club employee bung works ! The whole scenario stinks from top to bottom , it's now just a case of who can make the most before the ship goes t"st up ! And the mug paying fans left in the lurch while greedy players/ agents /senior management move on to pastures new with their pockets filled not to mention foreign bank accounts![/p][/quote]Don't talk to me like I'm a simpleton, I'm well aware of the amount of corruption in some sports. However, seeing as you have no proof of this I don't think you should be making those accusations. Just because you don't like someone it doesn't mean they're on the take. It's almost as ridiculous as those people saying that Hendry is only being kept on because he owes money to someone from the Walker Trust. This is the same Walker Trust, I assume, who sold the club to Venky's over two years ago, long before Hendry was hired? There's far too many people on here who want to believe that the club is rotten to the core just because they don't like the initial influence Jerome Anderson had at the club. These same people will try to convince you that he still has some influence, despite Venky's saying he doesn't.[/p][/quote]Think if you have a look at Hendry`s creditors when he went bankrupt , he owed Howard Walker 150 ,000 pounds NOT the Walker trust ,this was a personal loan from Howard Walker to Hendry ,Hendry went bankrupt owing him this money, so as Coar a close friend of Howard Walker simlpy organised the job as a means to pay Walker his money back, obviously it is illegal, to pay back a preferred unsecured creditor it is against the law but it happens all the time, also Coar is a Burnley fan and tried to get on the board there years ago, so try and get your facts right before commenting.[/p][/quote]Reread what I wrote and you'll see that I never said Hendry owed the Walkers Trust money, I said there are people on here who say it. Get your facts right before commenting.[/p][/quote]NO srvp28 YOUR THE ONLY PERSON THAT WROTE HENDRY OWED THE WALKER TRUST, AND ALSO YOU MOCKED THE PEOPLE WHO COMMENTED ON THE CUNNING SCHEME THAT HAS BEEN SET UP TO PAY BACK HOWARD WALKER.. HENDRY OWED/OWES HOWARD WALKER 150,000 POUNDS FOR A PERSONAL LOAN HE GOT FROM H.WALKER A FEW MONTHS BEFORE HENDRY WENT BANKRUPT . THE PLOT IS THAT HENDRY GOT THE JOB AT ROVERS SO WALKER COULD GET HIS MONEY BACK FROM HENDRY`S WAGES HENCE THE 8,000 POUNDS A WEEK FOR THE ASSISTANT COACH TO THE RESERVE TEAM ,A MASSIVE SALARY TO PAY A MAN DOING HIS JOB SHOULD BE ABOUT 8,000 POUNDS A WEEK, HIGHLY ILLEGAL BUT STILL QUITE AN OBVIOUS ASSUMPTION.[/p][/quote]THAT SHOULD READ THE ASSISTANT COACH TO THE RESERVES SHOULD EARN A MAXIMUN OF 800 POUNDS A WEEK. NOT 8,000 A WEEK WHICH IT IS WELL DOCUMENTED SOMEHOW OR OTHER HE MANAGES TO GET ROVERS TO PAY HIM , REMEMBER ULTIMATELY THE SUPPORTERS PAY ALL THE WAGES.. BRFC75
  • Score: 0

12:57pm Tue 1 Jan 13

srvp28 says...

BRFC75 wrote:
BRFC75 wrote:
srvp28 wrote:
BRFC75 wrote:
srvp28 wrote:
peely wrote:
srvp28 wrote:
blueblooded wrote:
edmy wrote:
Read the latest from the Daily Mail We have a contagious disease at Ewood it is called the Venkys. all it touches are doomed.
"THE VENKYS" They sacked Sam, They appointed Kean, They got rid of a fantastic Board and several other prominent office staff. They presided over the removal of several senior players. They appointed Shebby. Who else is there to blame. If the don't sell soon we won't have a club worth jacks**t to sell.
Revealed: From boardroom split to player revolt, the inside story of crisis engulfing Blackburn

Senior players revolt after poor start to season
Derek Shaw wants controversial Shebby Singh out
Club no closer to naming successor to Henning Berg


Read more: http://www.dailymail









.co.uk/sport/footbal









l/article-2255191/Bl









ackburn-Rovers-crisi









s-players-revolt-She









bby-Singh
Seriously?

You call that inside story?

Every man and his dog knows senior players were not impressed with Berg's appointment and the Daily Fail's exclusive already tells you who spun THAT leak.

"Shaw, An experienced administrator.. "

"That was the last straw.." Really Derek? Haven't heard an awful lot from you or that other Anderson stooge up to now. What happened? Singh taking all your power away to continue stealing money from the club via your dodgy agent dealings spoiled your plans?

As Sonny said, Singh may be a lot of things, but stripping the club of its assets isnt one of them. His ambitions are much less sinister - small comfort that it is - but it's becoming very apparent now who the "enemy" he referred to are, and the sooner they're gone the better.

With regard to the Senior players who are not happy, you are getting premiership wages to sit on your butts and to be brutally honest, you are average to downright mediocre in some cases, and if you want away in January, feel free to go. I very much doubt the big clubs are going to be hammering at the door to get most of you, but all the best and thank you for your contribution over the years is all I have to say to you.

HUGHES IN.
In what capacity can Shaw or Agnew make money from any transfer dealings exactly?
"In what capacity can Shaw or Agnew make any money from transfer dealings ". Oh. Per lease , come on - do we really need to spell it out how this agent / club employee bung works ! The whole scenario stinks from top to bottom , it's now just a case of who can make the most before the ship goes t"st up ! And the mug paying fans left in the lurch while greedy players/ agents /senior management move on to pastures new with their pockets filled not to mention foreign bank accounts!
Don't talk to me like I'm a simpleton, I'm well aware of the amount of corruption in some sports. However, seeing as you have no proof of this I don't think you should be making those accusations. Just because you don't like someone it doesn't mean they're on the take.

It's almost as ridiculous as those people saying that Hendry is only being kept on because he owes money to someone from the Walker Trust. This is the same Walker Trust, I assume, who sold the club to Venky's over two years ago, long before Hendry was hired?

There's far too many people on here who want to believe that the club is rotten to the core just because they don't like the initial influence Jerome Anderson had at the club. These same people will try to convince you that he still has some influence, despite Venky's saying he doesn't.
Think if you have a look at Hendry`s creditors when he went bankrupt , he owed Howard Walker 150 ,000 pounds NOT the Walker trust ,this was a personal loan from Howard Walker to Hendry ,Hendry went bankrupt owing him this money, so as Coar a close friend of Howard Walker simlpy organised the job as a means to pay Walker his money back, obviously it is illegal, to pay back a preferred unsecured creditor it is against the law but it happens all the time, also Coar is a Burnley fan and tried to get on the board there years ago, so try and get your facts right before commenting.
Reread what I wrote and you'll see that I never said Hendry owed the Walkers Trust money, I said there are people on here who say it. Get your facts right before commenting.
NO srvp28 YOUR THE ONLY PERSON THAT WROTE HENDRY OWED THE WALKER TRUST, AND ALSO YOU MOCKED THE PEOPLE WHO COMMENTED ON THE CUNNING SCHEME THAT HAS BEEN SET UP TO PAY BACK HOWARD WALKER..

HENDRY OWED/OWES HOWARD WALKER 150,000 POUNDS FOR A PERSONAL LOAN HE GOT FROM H.WALKER A FEW MONTHS BEFORE HENDRY WENT BANKRUPT .

THE PLOT IS THAT HENDRY GOT THE JOB AT ROVERS SO WALKER COULD GET HIS MONEY BACK FROM HENDRY`S WAGES HENCE THE 8,000 POUNDS A WEEK FOR THE ASSISTANT COACH TO THE RESERVE TEAM ,A MASSIVE SALARY TO PAY A MAN DOING HIS JOB SHOULD BE ABOUT 8,000 POUNDS A WEEK, HIGHLY ILLEGAL BUT STILL QUITE AN OBVIOUS ASSUMPTION.
THAT SHOULD READ THE ASSISTANT COACH TO THE RESERVES SHOULD EARN A MAXIMUN OF 800 POUNDS A WEEK. NOT 8,000 A WEEK WHICH IT IS WELL DOCUMENTED SOMEHOW OR OTHER HE MANAGES TO GET ROVERS TO PAY HIM , REMEMBER ULTIMATELY THE SUPPORTERS PAY ALL THE WAGES..
"It's almost as ridiculous as those people saying Hendry is only being kept on because he owes money to someone from the Walker Trust."

That's a reference to what OTHER people have said on here.
[quote][p][bold]BRFC75[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]BRFC75[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]srvp28[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]BRFC75[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]srvp28[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]peely[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]srvp28[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]blueblooded[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]edmy[/bold] wrote: Read the latest from the Daily Mail We have a contagious disease at Ewood it is called the Venkys. all it touches are doomed. "THE VENKYS" They sacked Sam, They appointed Kean, They got rid of a fantastic Board and several other prominent office staff. They presided over the removal of several senior players. They appointed Shebby. Who else is there to blame. If the don't sell soon we won't have a club worth jacks**t to sell. Revealed: From boardroom split to player revolt, the inside story of crisis engulfing Blackburn Senior players revolt after poor start to season Derek Shaw wants controversial Shebby Singh out Club no closer to naming successor to Henning Berg Read more: http://www.dailymail .co.uk/sport/footbal l/article-2255191/Bl ackburn-Rovers-crisi s-players-revolt-She bby-Singh[/p][/quote]Seriously? You call that inside story? Every man and his dog knows senior players were not impressed with Berg's appointment and the Daily Fail's exclusive already tells you who spun THAT leak. "Shaw, An experienced administrator.. " "That was the last straw.." Really Derek? Haven't heard an awful lot from you or that other Anderson stooge up to now. What happened? Singh taking all your power away to continue stealing money from the club via your dodgy agent dealings spoiled your plans? As Sonny said, Singh may be a lot of things, but stripping the club of its assets isnt one of them. His ambitions are much less sinister - small comfort that it is - but it's becoming very apparent now who the "enemy" he referred to are, and the sooner they're gone the better. With regard to the Senior players who are not happy, you are getting premiership wages to sit on your butts and to be brutally honest, you are average to downright mediocre in some cases, and if you want away in January, feel free to go. I very much doubt the big clubs are going to be hammering at the door to get most of you, but all the best and thank you for your contribution over the years is all I have to say to you. HUGHES IN.[/p][/quote]In what capacity can Shaw or Agnew make money from any transfer dealings exactly?[/p][/quote]"In what capacity can Shaw or Agnew make any money from transfer dealings ". Oh. Per lease , come on - do we really need to spell it out how this agent / club employee bung works ! The whole scenario stinks from top to bottom , it's now just a case of who can make the most before the ship goes t"st up ! And the mug paying fans left in the lurch while greedy players/ agents /senior management move on to pastures new with their pockets filled not to mention foreign bank accounts![/p][/quote]Don't talk to me like I'm a simpleton, I'm well aware of the amount of corruption in some sports. However, seeing as you have no proof of this I don't think you should be making those accusations. Just because you don't like someone it doesn't mean they're on the take. It's almost as ridiculous as those people saying that Hendry is only being kept on because he owes money to someone from the Walker Trust. This is the same Walker Trust, I assume, who sold the club to Venky's over two years ago, long before Hendry was hired? There's far too many people on here who want to believe that the club is rotten to the core just because they don't like the initial influence Jerome Anderson had at the club. These same people will try to convince you that he still has some influence, despite Venky's saying he doesn't.[/p][/quote]Think if you have a look at Hendry`s creditors when he went bankrupt , he owed Howard Walker 150 ,000 pounds NOT the Walker trust ,this was a personal loan from Howard Walker to Hendry ,Hendry went bankrupt owing him this money, so as Coar a close friend of Howard Walker simlpy organised the job as a means to pay Walker his money back, obviously it is illegal, to pay back a preferred unsecured creditor it is against the law but it happens all the time, also Coar is a Burnley fan and tried to get on the board there years ago, so try and get your facts right before commenting.[/p][/quote]Reread what I wrote and you'll see that I never said Hendry owed the Walkers Trust money, I said there are people on here who say it. Get your facts right before commenting.[/p][/quote]NO srvp28 YOUR THE ONLY PERSON THAT WROTE HENDRY OWED THE WALKER TRUST, AND ALSO YOU MOCKED THE PEOPLE WHO COMMENTED ON THE CUNNING SCHEME THAT HAS BEEN SET UP TO PAY BACK HOWARD WALKER.. HENDRY OWED/OWES HOWARD WALKER 150,000 POUNDS FOR A PERSONAL LOAN HE GOT FROM H.WALKER A FEW MONTHS BEFORE HENDRY WENT BANKRUPT . THE PLOT IS THAT HENDRY GOT THE JOB AT ROVERS SO WALKER COULD GET HIS MONEY BACK FROM HENDRY`S WAGES HENCE THE 8,000 POUNDS A WEEK FOR THE ASSISTANT COACH TO THE RESERVE TEAM ,A MASSIVE SALARY TO PAY A MAN DOING HIS JOB SHOULD BE ABOUT 8,000 POUNDS A WEEK, HIGHLY ILLEGAL BUT STILL QUITE AN OBVIOUS ASSUMPTION.[/p][/quote]THAT SHOULD READ THE ASSISTANT COACH TO THE RESERVES SHOULD EARN A MAXIMUN OF 800 POUNDS A WEEK. NOT 8,000 A WEEK WHICH IT IS WELL DOCUMENTED SOMEHOW OR OTHER HE MANAGES TO GET ROVERS TO PAY HIM , REMEMBER ULTIMATELY THE SUPPORTERS PAY ALL THE WAGES..[/p][/quote]"It's almost as ridiculous as those people saying Hendry is only being kept on because he owes money to someone from the Walker Trust." That's a reference to what OTHER people have said on here. srvp28
  • Score: 0

1:48pm Tue 1 Jan 13

owd nick says...

srvp28 wrote:
BRFC75 wrote:
BRFC75 wrote:
srvp28 wrote:
BRFC75 wrote:
srvp28 wrote:
peely wrote:
srvp28 wrote:
blueblooded wrote:
edmy wrote:
Read the latest from the Daily Mail We have a contagious disease at Ewood it is called the Venkys. all it touches are doomed.
"THE VENKYS" They sacked Sam, They appointed Kean, They got rid of a fantastic Board and several other prominent office staff. They presided over the removal of several senior players. They appointed Shebby. Who else is there to blame. If the don't sell soon we won't have a club worth jacks**t to sell.
Revealed: From boardroom split to player revolt, the inside story of crisis engulfing Blackburn

Senior players revolt after poor start to season
Derek Shaw wants controversial Shebby Singh out
Club no closer to naming successor to Henning Berg


Read more: http://www.dailymail










.co.uk/sport/footbal










l/article-2255191/Bl










ackburn-Rovers-crisi










s-players-revolt-She










bby-Singh
Seriously?

You call that inside story?

Every man and his dog knows senior players were not impressed with Berg's appointment and the Daily Fail's exclusive already tells you who spun THAT leak.

"Shaw, An experienced administrator.. "

"That was the last straw.." Really Derek? Haven't heard an awful lot from you or that other Anderson stooge up to now. What happened? Singh taking all your power away to continue stealing money from the club via your dodgy agent dealings spoiled your plans?

As Sonny said, Singh may be a lot of things, but stripping the club of its assets isnt one of them. His ambitions are much less sinister - small comfort that it is - but it's becoming very apparent now who the "enemy" he referred to are, and the sooner they're gone the better.

With regard to the Senior players who are not happy, you are getting premiership wages to sit on your butts and to be brutally honest, you are average to downright mediocre in some cases, and if you want away in January, feel free to go. I very much doubt the big clubs are going to be hammering at the door to get most of you, but all the best and thank you for your contribution over the years is all I have to say to you.

HUGHES IN.
In what capacity can Shaw or Agnew make money from any transfer dealings exactly?
"In what capacity can Shaw or Agnew make any money from transfer dealings ". Oh. Per lease , come on - do we really need to spell it out how this agent / club employee bung works ! The whole scenario stinks from top to bottom , it's now just a case of who can make the most before the ship goes t"st up ! And the mug paying fans left in the lurch while greedy players/ agents /senior management move on to pastures new with their pockets filled not to mention foreign bank accounts!
Don't talk to me like I'm a simpleton, I'm well aware of the amount of corruption in some sports. However, seeing as you have no proof of this I don't think you should be making those accusations. Just because you don't like someone it doesn't mean they're on the take.

It's almost as ridiculous as those people saying that Hendry is only being kept on because he owes money to someone from the Walker Trust. This is the same Walker Trust, I assume, who sold the club to Venky's over two years ago, long before Hendry was hired?

There's far too many people on here who want to believe that the club is rotten to the core just because they don't like the initial influence Jerome Anderson had at the club. These same people will try to convince you that he still has some influence, despite Venky's saying he doesn't.
Think if you have a look at Hendry`s creditors when he went bankrupt , he owed Howard Walker 150 ,000 pounds NOT the Walker trust ,this was a personal loan from Howard Walker to Hendry ,Hendry went bankrupt owing him this money, so as Coar a close friend of Howard Walker simlpy organised the job as a means to pay Walker his money back, obviously it is illegal, to pay back a preferred unsecured creditor it is against the law but it happens all the time, also Coar is a Burnley fan and tried to get on the board there years ago, so try and get your facts right before commenting.
Reread what I wrote and you'll see that I never said Hendry owed the Walkers Trust money, I said there are people on here who say it. Get your facts right before commenting.
NO srvp28 YOUR THE ONLY PERSON THAT WROTE HENDRY OWED THE WALKER TRUST, AND ALSO YOU MOCKED THE PEOPLE WHO COMMENTED ON THE CUNNING SCHEME THAT HAS BEEN SET UP TO PAY BACK HOWARD WALKER..

HENDRY OWED/OWES HOWARD WALKER 150,000 POUNDS FOR A PERSONAL LOAN HE GOT FROM H.WALKER A FEW MONTHS BEFORE HENDRY WENT BANKRUPT .

THE PLOT IS THAT HENDRY GOT THE JOB AT ROVERS SO WALKER COULD GET HIS MONEY BACK FROM HENDRY`S WAGES HENCE THE 8,000 POUNDS A WEEK FOR THE ASSISTANT COACH TO THE RESERVE TEAM ,A MASSIVE SALARY TO PAY A MAN DOING HIS JOB SHOULD BE ABOUT 8,000 POUNDS A WEEK, HIGHLY ILLEGAL BUT STILL QUITE AN OBVIOUS ASSUMPTION.
THAT SHOULD READ THE ASSISTANT COACH TO THE RESERVES SHOULD EARN A MAXIMUN OF 800 POUNDS A WEEK. NOT 8,000 A WEEK WHICH IT IS WELL DOCUMENTED SOMEHOW OR OTHER HE MANAGES TO GET ROVERS TO PAY HIM , REMEMBER ULTIMATELY THE SUPPORTERS PAY ALL THE WAGES..
"It's almost as ridiculous as those people saying Hendry is only being kept on because he owes money to someone from the Walker Trust."

That's a reference to what OTHER people have said on here.
FFS, why don't you lot book a room and swap bodily fluids or something.
[quote][p][bold]srvp28[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]BRFC75[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]BRFC75[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]srvp28[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]BRFC75[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]srvp28[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]peely[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]srvp28[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]blueblooded[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]edmy[/bold] wrote: Read the latest from the Daily Mail We have a contagious disease at Ewood it is called the Venkys. all it touches are doomed. "THE VENKYS" They sacked Sam, They appointed Kean, They got rid of a fantastic Board and several other prominent office staff. They presided over the removal of several senior players. They appointed Shebby. Who else is there to blame. If the don't sell soon we won't have a club worth jacks**t to sell. Revealed: From boardroom split to player revolt, the inside story of crisis engulfing Blackburn Senior players revolt after poor start to season Derek Shaw wants controversial Shebby Singh out Club no closer to naming successor to Henning Berg Read more: http://www.dailymail .co.uk/sport/footbal l/article-2255191/Bl ackburn-Rovers-crisi s-players-revolt-She bby-Singh[/p][/quote]Seriously? You call that inside story? Every man and his dog knows senior players were not impressed with Berg's appointment and the Daily Fail's exclusive already tells you who spun THAT leak. "Shaw, An experienced administrator.. " "That was the last straw.." Really Derek? Haven't heard an awful lot from you or that other Anderson stooge up to now. What happened? Singh taking all your power away to continue stealing money from the club via your dodgy agent dealings spoiled your plans? As Sonny said, Singh may be a lot of things, but stripping the club of its assets isnt one of them. His ambitions are much less sinister - small comfort that it is - but it's becoming very apparent now who the "enemy" he referred to are, and the sooner they're gone the better. With regard to the Senior players who are not happy, you are getting premiership wages to sit on your butts and to be brutally honest, you are average to downright mediocre in some cases, and if you want away in January, feel free to go. I very much doubt the big clubs are going to be hammering at the door to get most of you, but all the best and thank you for your contribution over the years is all I have to say to you. HUGHES IN.[/p][/quote]In what capacity can Shaw or Agnew make money from any transfer dealings exactly?[/p][/quote]"In what capacity can Shaw or Agnew make any money from transfer dealings ". Oh. Per lease , come on - do we really need to spell it out how this agent / club employee bung works ! The whole scenario stinks from top to bottom , it's now just a case of who can make the most before the ship goes t"st up ! And the mug paying fans left in the lurch while greedy players/ agents /senior management move on to pastures new with their pockets filled not to mention foreign bank accounts![/p][/quote]Don't talk to me like I'm a simpleton, I'm well aware of the amount of corruption in some sports. However, seeing as you have no proof of this I don't think you should be making those accusations. Just because you don't like someone it doesn't mean they're on the take. It's almost as ridiculous as those people saying that Hendry is only being kept on because he owes money to someone from the Walker Trust. This is the same Walker Trust, I assume, who sold the club to Venky's over two years ago, long before Hendry was hired? There's far too many people on here who want to believe that the club is rotten to the core just because they don't like the initial influence Jerome Anderson had at the club. These same people will try to convince you that he still has some influence, despite Venky's saying he doesn't.[/p][/quote]Think if you have a look at Hendry`s creditors when he went bankrupt , he owed Howard Walker 150 ,000 pounds NOT the Walker trust ,this was a personal loan from Howard Walker to Hendry ,Hendry went bankrupt owing him this money, so as Coar a close friend of Howard Walker simlpy organised the job as a means to pay Walker his money back, obviously it is illegal, to pay back a preferred unsecured creditor it is against the law but it happens all the time, also Coar is a Burnley fan and tried to get on the board there years ago, so try and get your facts right before commenting.[/p][/quote]Reread what I wrote and you'll see that I never said Hendry owed the Walkers Trust money, I said there are people on here who say it. Get your facts right before commenting.[/p][/quote]NO srvp28 YOUR THE ONLY PERSON THAT WROTE HENDRY OWED THE WALKER TRUST, AND ALSO YOU MOCKED THE PEOPLE WHO COMMENTED ON THE CUNNING SCHEME THAT HAS BEEN SET UP TO PAY BACK HOWARD WALKER.. HENDRY OWED/OWES HOWARD WALKER 150,000 POUNDS FOR A PERSONAL LOAN HE GOT FROM H.WALKER A FEW MONTHS BEFORE HENDRY WENT BANKRUPT . THE PLOT IS THAT HENDRY GOT THE JOB AT ROVERS SO WALKER COULD GET HIS MONEY BACK FROM HENDRY`S WAGES HENCE THE 8,000 POUNDS A WEEK FOR THE ASSISTANT COACH TO THE RESERVE TEAM ,A MASSIVE SALARY TO PAY A MAN DOING HIS JOB SHOULD BE ABOUT 8,000 POUNDS A WEEK, HIGHLY ILLEGAL BUT STILL QUITE AN OBVIOUS ASSUMPTION.[/p][/quote]THAT SHOULD READ THE ASSISTANT COACH TO THE RESERVES SHOULD EARN A MAXIMUN OF 800 POUNDS A WEEK. NOT 8,000 A WEEK WHICH IT IS WELL DOCUMENTED SOMEHOW OR OTHER HE MANAGES TO GET ROVERS TO PAY HIM , REMEMBER ULTIMATELY THE SUPPORTERS PAY ALL THE WAGES..[/p][/quote]"It's almost as ridiculous as those people saying Hendry is only being kept on because he owes money to someone from the Walker Trust." That's a reference to what OTHER people have said on here.[/p][/quote]FFS, why don't you lot book a room and swap bodily fluids or something. owd nick
  • Score: 0

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

Get Adobe Flash player
About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree