FLUORIDATION of water is aimed at improving children’s dental health. However, all the population will be exposed to it and there is no control on amounts consumed or safety levels.

This is particularly a factor for children, those with some medical condition and those sports training.

Fluoride is not properly excreted in those with impaired kidney function, and can be harmful to those who are sensitive or allergic to it.

Excessive fluoride can damage enamel of developing teeth. Fluoride application to the teeth is recommended as being more effective than if ingested.

Studies suggest it can alter the endocrine system. Toxicology studies suggest it affects the developing brain to cause learning deficit and attention deficit disorder and in adults may cause impaired memory, reduced concentration and play a part in the development of Alzheimer’s disease.

Fluoride used in water is not that used in toothpaste, or that found naturally in water. It is a by-product of industry and may contain impurities such as lead mercury beryllium and arsenic, and is listed as a poison.

Its use as a commercially ingested product contravenes UK and EU regulations on the use of medical substances and the Poisons Act.

Fluoridation of water is not of dental benefit to adults.

If the aim is to improve children’s teeth then would it not be more advisable to tackle the more relevant issues and causes of poor diet and oral hygiene, improve dental education and increased access to dentists?

Can those in charge of deciding on water fluoridation justify the expenditure of £102million when reviews state cost effectiveness is inconclusive?

Can they say with confidence it will provide the desired outcome?

Can they refute with certainty the medical evidence, and verify its safety and absence of side effects.

If not, are they willing to expose the public to the possible negative effects with doubtful benefits?

PATRICIA COOPER, Waterside Terrace, Waterside, Darwen.