Insurance Bill goes to the Lords (From Lancashire Telegraph)
When news happens, text LT and your photos and videos to 80360. Or contact us by email or phone.
Jack Straw column RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos
Insurance Bill goes to the Lords
11:01am Thursday 3rd November 2011 in Jack Straw column
By Jack Straw, MP for Blackburn
Regular readers will recall that in mid-September I introduced a Bill into the House of Commons to clean up some of the worst practices of the motor insurance and claims’ industries, which have forced up premiums 40 per cent in a single year (by much more in some areas, including ours).
This Bill has four key parts: 1) To make it impossible to claim damages for ‘whiplash’ except where there had been a real injury which decent doctors could objectively diagnose.
2) To cut in half the £1,200 flat fee which lawyers get for making a claim (for less than £10,000) through the Ministry of Justice electronic ‘portal’.
3) To stop ‘post-code discrimination’ against areas like ours (and others that are even harder hit).
4) To ban ‘referral fees’ – the outrageous trade by which people’s personal details, and their claims, are bought and sold, typically for £600 a case, by claims’ management companies, lawyers, others – and the insurers themselves.
Three days before my Bill was due for debate, Justice Secretary Kenneth Clarke announced that the Government now agreed with me about banning referral fees.
I am very grateful to him.
This Tuesday Mr Clarke was as good as his word, and brought forward new provisions into a Justice Bill already before the House to effect this ban, in respect of personal injury claims.
So far, so good – and Mr Clarke’s new provisions went through the House with all-party support.
However, there is a key issue about how this ban should be enforced.
Mr Clarke believes that it should be done through the various regulators – like the solicitors’ regulatory bodies, and the new Financial Conduct Authority.
I said that’s fine as far as it goes, but the ban should also be backed by criminal sanctions.
So I pushed an amendment to this effect to the vote, but lost.
The Bill will now go to the Lords. I’ll now be working with colleagues there to get the other reforms in my list into the Bill.
Comments are closed on this article.
Comments (4)
1:24pm Thu 3 Nov 11
Jerzei Balowski says...
1:57pm Thu 3 Nov 11
manyarecalled says...
regarding (1) , back injuries are notoriously difficult to diagnose. so that is assuming guilt unless proven innocent.
for (3) , be sure there will be moves to get that watered down.
this leaves (2) . whether the legal profession will vote themselves a pay cut , I don't know.
apart from that , it is a watertight bill. unless of course , it is lost in parliamentary procedure.
fortunately , the relatives of the victims of Hillsborough don't have to wait for your approval.
6:35pm Thu 3 Nov 11
district01 says...
http://www.youtube.c
om/watch?v=1MsKW84b-
7E
6:49pm Thu 3 Nov 11
district01 says...
Because I’ve experienced problems posting web addresses before like the one above I just checked and found that some blank spaces were added and yes it didn’t work again. Two of them were place so after I deleted them the link worked. Perhaps if the content is longer than the column it inserts a blank space?
Interesting - Does anyone know why this happens?