Opinion RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


Cycling boom could be good for East Lancs

THE idea of the county and particularly East Lancashire becoming the country’s top destination for cyclists is great.

We’ve got a head start in promoting the area by having the president of the fantastically successful British Cycling (Brian Cookson), the governing body of the sport in the UK, working in Pendle.

Cycling is healthy and we have some great countryside to explore and excellent venues like Lee Quarry in Rossendale being developed.

The money mountain bikers and more leisurely pedallers could bring in to East Lancashire as visitors is another reason why they should be encouraged.

But cash has to be invested in facilities specially for two-wheel enthusiasts to stop them ruining the countryside for others.

Walkers were the first to follow the historic network of footpaths and they turn out in their thousands through the week as well as at weekends to stroll across moorland and through fields and forests.

The county and Blackburn with Darwen councils have done a lot of maintain and develop these walkways.

They also employ rangers and have managed to do a fair job of keeping out the idiots who a few years ago threatened to invade and destroy many open areas by illegally speeding about on off-road motorbikes.

Mountain bikers don’t make any noise (apart from the heavy breathing of less-fit cyclists) but the men and women in lycra don’t half make a mess of footpaths.

Comparatively firm walkways are quickly churned up into mudbaths that mean water finds its way into even the best walking boots and on sloping ground its difficult to stay upright.

Segregation is the key and in the same way that horse riders have to stick to official bridleways – we must develop cycleways.

The Dutch and Germans have superb networks of cycle tracks and solid routes that keep those on two wheels away from walkers – and motorists too.

Getting more people out cycling on East Lancashire’s roads is another laudable idea – but in order for this to be successful there need to be big changes in the mindset of motorists as well as cash.

We must have cycle lanes properly marked on roads, not the stupid sections that suddenly appear for a few hundred yards and then vanish – as if they have been randomly drawn by a workman with a tin of paint.

And drivers need show cyclists the same courtesy as the Dutch rather than treating them as an annoying obstacle that should be forced into the nearest hedge!

Comments(3)

sean_brfc says...
2:37pm Wed 8 Feb 12

Good article, but not sure about complete segregation of footpaths and cycle tracks. I would rather see more investment in maintaining existing tracks (but by all means increase the size of the network) then cyclists and walkers can try and get on and everyone is allowed everywhere.

charliechinuk says...
9:37am Thu 9 Feb 12

I am not very confident on roads, due to a bicycle accident (where a van swerved into me) so I tend to stick to cycle paths so more cycle paths will be great for me.

happycyclist says...
11:58am Fri 10 Feb 12

This is a mixed-up and confusing article. Cycle lanes on roads/pavements are a completely different proposition to off-road facilities.

As for 'men and women in lycra don't have make a mess of footpaths...' well apart from the fact that they shouldn't legally be on footpaths, this article dispels some myths about erosion caused by mountain-bikers.

http://www.ctc.org.u
k/resources/Magazine
/201103042.pdf

The legal issue of rights of way needs redressing so that it is fit for the 21st century and the changing needs of those who use the outdoors as their playground, and rather than rely on antiquated laws, it might be better to think along the lines of impact when deciding where mountain-bikers should be allowed. There are miles of designated public footpaths that are perfectly suitable for cyclists, and many miles of bridleways that are not. Much of the animosity between walkers and mountain-bikers is because walkers are content to lazily use a line of pink dots on an OS map as the base of their argument, when morally and ethically it's not an argument they've got, it's just a giant chip on their shoulder.

That's not to say that there isn't lots that the biking fraternity can't do to help matters, because there is. Just like the roads, there's plenty of room for everyone if everyone has a bit of consideration for everyone else.

click2find

Most popular


About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree