News RSS Feed


Rossendale windfarm takes shape

10:00pm Friday 18th April 2008

Comments (13)   Have your say »

By Michael Griffiths »

THE first turbines are up-and-running at a controversial windfarm which is set to transform the Rossendale landscape.

Four turbines are now spinning and undergoing tests on the Scout Moor wind farm and another two should be in action within a week.

Engineers have already erected a total of 15 turbines on the hills above Rossendale with work on the 26 turbine windfarm expected to be completed by July.

When completed, it will be the biggest onshore wind farm in England stretching across two miles of moorland.

Each turbine is 60 metres (200 feet) in height and each of its blades will help generate 65 megawatts of electricity, providing power for 40,000 homes.

Parts of Edenfield had to be closed to traffic as the parts for the turbines were transported up to the moors.

Jamie Mathlin, project manager for McNicholas Construction, said: "We have eleven turbines left to do and are managing to build two a week.

"The ironic thing is that it has been really windy of late with winds reaching 100 miles per hour and if it's really windy we can't do the work."

He added: "Work will be most likely completed by mid to late July."

Councillors who have spoken in opposition the wind farm have said they have mixed feelings about the development.

Coun Darryl Smith said: "We had a residents' meeting recently and the majority of people were quite dispondent about it."

But he said the sight of the turbines, which can be seen from up to 20 miles away, are something residents would have to get used to.

Coun Smith added: "The thing is the moor has been lost for time immemorial, it has gone forever. But they are a permanent fixture and they are quite remarkable."

Coun Anne Cheetham said: "They are on the other side of the Moor and they don't make any noise. But they are there now and I have accepted them. I just hope they provide a return on the investment."

The wind farm was given the go-ahead in 2005 despite oppostion from campaigners who criticised the wind turbine's effectiveness in cutting carbon emissions.

But Peel Wind Power who own the farm say it will cut 160,000 tonnes of carbon dioxide emissions from coal-fired power stations.

Your Say YourTelegraph

chris A, rochdale says...
2:06pm Wed 7 May 08

wind farms are an eyesore,but what infuriates me the most is the contract for the turbines going to nordex,at least use a british company so it benefits our engineering economy

Burnley Taxpayer, Burnley says...
9:04am Tue 22 Apr 08

Hard to see how you can make Rossendale look worse? I like wind turbines and can see the Cliviger windfarm from my bedroom window.

same old sheet, rossendale says...
5:11pm Mon 21 Apr 08

Im all for renewable enery if its worthwhile - will these be any good on those cold, cold but wind free days when they are really needed - give me nuclear any day - at least we wont be paying pack the subsidies that these 'farms' have been given. Why not wave power - at least the tide movement is a given every day unless someone is planning on taking the moon away.
Wind Farms - nice idea - but really just not practical and a 8astardisation of the landscape to boot - i bet if people really realised just how far away they could see these turbines from maybe more people would have took the time to object - but then again its only rossendale isnt it so you can do what you like to it because everyone (outside of the area) thinks its a **** hole.

waterfooter, waterfoot says...
2:24pm Sun 20 Apr 08

Every thing has to keep up with the times but should we not think about going back to water power ,The rivers and streams in Rossendale had the power to run all the factorys could this not have been used in some way instead of the windmills that are visable for miles

WayneKerr, says...
8:04pm Sat 19 Apr 08

What a surprise to see the valley numpties only seeing the doom and gloom in everything.

If having an enviromentally friendly solution to supplying electricity is such a problem you need to stop playing the banjo as much and get out more.

Yee Haa Cletus!!

lisajlb, rossendale says...
6:37pm Sat 19 Apr 08

i do not think they are an eyesore in any way shape or form. i see them every day and think they are fantastic. they are neat and at the end of the day are essential as nature is needed to power all the things we demand these days.
bring on more!

just me, my house close to a wind turbine says...
6:26pm Sat 19 Apr 08

A wind turbine has been erected on one of the approach roads that lead into our town centre, its a putrid green colour and a complete eyesore.

removals R me, my front room says...
1:44pm Sat 19 Apr 08

Mike wrote:
I find it hard to describe as eyesores those magnificent marvels of engineering
The H-Bomb was a magnificent marvel of science and engineering but would you like 25 of them outside your garden? Studies in other countries have shown that wind farms are not cost effective .In this part of the country we live in a hilly area with plenty of streams that run all year and modern technology means hydro electric methods are a viable alternative.
the h-bomb was the most usefull invention this centuary

greenman, rossendale says...
12:54pm Sat 19 Apr 08

I agree with mr mr's comments. Many of the people who complain the most are the ones with lights burning all over their houses, and TVs/computers in each room, if they don't want them they should cut down their own consumption before moaning. With the price of oil likely to get even higher in the future, there will be even greater pressure to build more nuclear power stations to cater for their increasing demands, and I know which I prefer. Whatever the arguments against wind power, at least it doesn't make us dependent on imported fuels from unfriendly nations, and has also opened up the moorland to a great many more walkers and cyclists, who normally wouldn't ever go up there (I wonder how many complainers have ever tried walking through all the wet peat up there, which is what Scout Moor is mostly made up of?).

mr mr, rossendale says...
11:58am Sat 19 Apr 08

strange comparison an H-bomb and a wind turbine! however splitting the atom as prevented a third world war and provided us with carbon free fuel for many years.as for hydro power well we my have a few streams and rivers but not enough to provide power for 40,000 homes .you cant just put an hydro unit in a stream and expect big numbers! you need to build a dam and build up an enourmous amount of back pressure..in wich case you end up using an huge amount of land and money..the same argument was used when the national grid was constructed people against pylons it,s the same old argument (not in my back yard)but you flick the switch and expect the lights to come on.the uk population only occupies a mere 7% of land the amount used by wind farms doesent even equate.and I would prefer 26 turbines outside my back garden than just one coal fired power station

Mike, Rossendale says...
10:10am Sat 19 Apr 08

I find it hard to describe as eyesores those magnificent marvels of engineering


The H-Bomb was a magnificent marvel of science and engineering but would you like 25 of them outside your garden?
Studies in other countries have shown that wind farms are not cost effective .In this part of the country we live in a hilly area with plenty of streams that run all year and modern technology means hydro electric methods are a viable alternative.

mr mr, rossendale says...
3:12am Sat 19 Apr 08

I find it hard to describe as eyesores those magnificent marvels of engineering,that make a desolate landscape much more interesting!I believe there will be 26 turbines in total,looking via google earth theres room for a few thousand more,and as for subsidising them well what the hell does that matter if it has reduced the amount of fossil fuel we burn by a few thousand tonnes a year.stop being so selfish about so called blots on the landsacape and realise that windfarms are here to stay and are crucial to the energy needs and the drive to reduce carbon emmissions in this country.

observer, Hyndburn says...
12:05am Sat 19 Apr 08

These eyesores are even visible as far away as Great Harwood. A blot on the skyline. How much are we paying to Peel to subsidise the construction and running of these things? Bucket loads I'm sure. They would never do it if they had to pay the full cost of development.

Your sayYourTelegraph

Register for a FREE Lancashire Telegraph account and you can have your say on today's news and sport by adding comments on articles we publish. The best comments may even get published in the paper.

Please register now or sign in to continue.



Sponsored Adverts By Yahoo

Local Advertisers


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Sponsored Adverts By Yahoo
Sponsored Adverts By Yahoo