News RSS Feed


REGISTER NOW TO POST YOUR COMMENTS ON THESE STORIES

It's free and only takes a few seconds. Click here to go to the registration page.

Clitheroe attacker has jail term reduced

9:09pm Tuesday 29th April 2008

comment Comments (4)   Have your say »


A TEENAGE thug who was locked up for 18 months for two drunken and seemingly random early hours attacks on men in Clitheroe has won a six-month reduction in his sentence at the Court of Appeal.

The 17-year-old, who lives in the town but cannot be named for legal reasons, was sentenced to the 18-month detention and training order after admitting assault occasioning actual bodily harm, assault by beating and theft at Burnley Crown Court in January.

But after an appeal to two top judges at the Court of Appeal in London, the youth, who has a string of previous convictions for violence, had his term slashed to 12 months.

His barrister, Clare Thomas, had argued before Mr Justice Butterfield and Mrs Justice Swift that he had not received enough credit for having pleaded guilty and the time he spent behind bars awaiting sentencing.

Giving the court's judgment, Mrs Justice Swift told how the teenager first assaulted Daniel Cowgill as he rode his motor-scooter along a street in the town shortly before 1am on October 7 of last year.

Later, he assaulted Shaun Molyneux, after befriending him as he walked home from a late-night party.

Your Say YourTelegraph

escaped, Spain says...
8:26am Wed 30 Apr 08

Another two bewigged idiots who are out of touch with reality.
This violent toe rag should've been given at least five years.

jcb, says...
9:16am Wed 30 Apr 08

No wonder violent crime is on the increase, and the sooner they get rid of this stupid directive that you get a lesser sentence for pleading guilty the better. If you are guilty you are guilty, full stop.

opinionated, blackburn says...
12:57pm Wed 30 Apr 08

dont be hard on the lad!! after all, he did plead guilty, and its ok to to attack someone if you are going to admit to it. and also dont forget that the culprit gets more legal rights then the victims.

Burnley Taxpayer, Burnley says...
11:05am Thu 1 May 08

It's bad enough that the original sentence was inadequate without the appeal judges reducing it still further. Criminal scum like this (long record apparently) know they can play the system and do minimum time.
Pathetic.

Your sayYourTelegraph

comment Add your comment

Register for a FREE Lancashire Telegraph account and you can have your say on today's news and sport by adding comments on articles we publish. The best comments may even get published in the paper.

Please register now or sign in below to continue.




Forgotten your password?

Hot Jobs


Local Advertisers


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »