Congestion and pollution fears raised over housing developments in Whalley (From Lancashire Telegraph)
When news happens, text LT and your photos and videos to 80360. Or contact us by email or phone.
Congestion and pollution fears raised over housing developments in Whalley
10:00pm Sunday 20th May 2012 in Whalley
By Vanessa Cornall, Crime reporter
Traffic in Whalley could descend ‘into chaos’ if something is not done to ease the problems with congestion, parking and air pollution, an independent survey has found.
Residents have become so concerned about the problems, the Save Whalley Action group, has paid for an independent traffic survey, by Capita Simmons to identify how the problems will increase over the coming years.
More than 200 residents gathered at Whalley Abbey on Saturday to hear the results of the survey.
The issues have arisen after Dennis Wilson Homes submitted an application to Ribble Valley Council to create a new housing development by 2021.
This application combined with other projected plans, could mean 1,217 news houses in the village in the next nine years.
Ian Richardson, Director of Capita Symonds explained that by 2021 under this scenario queue lengths approaching the two mini roundabouts in the village would stretch up to one km and produce delays for drivers in the region of 15 minutes.
He said: “Whalley’s road network is close to saturation already.
“If something is not done to ease the problem, when the network is put under this extra pressure it will descend into chaos.
“Traffic is like water. It finds the path of least resistance, it will move on to roads less commonly used and flood the entire network.”
As well as the issues with congestion and parking, residents also expressed concerns that extra housing will devalue the village’s heritage, prevent Whalley children attending the already over subscribed primary school and increase air pollution.
Nick Walker, Chairman of Save Whalley Village, said: “We now have hard evidence that key junctions are already at capacity. The message from this work is that within a few years the road network in Whalley will cease to function effectively. Gridlock will be the result unless a proper plan to mitigate the effects is put in place right now.
“A month ago we sent Lancashire County Council this report and requested a meeting to discuss its findings. We have not even received an acknowledgement to our letter. This speaks volumes about their attitude and frankly LCC should be ashamed.”
He also said that group was particularly worried about pollution at the roundabout on King Street where it meets with Accrington Road.
For more information about the survey, visit www.savewhalleyvillage.org.uk
Comments are closed on this article.
Comments (24)
12:18am Mon 21 May 12
Pan-cake says...
“But Ian Richardson, from Capita Highways Consultancy, the firm the council uses for road matters, said: "We have undertaken careful studies to make sure the roads can cope.
"A fourth arm will be added to one junction which we are sure will mean that the traffic keeps moving.
"At the same time, we are confident there will be no blocks for 'blue light' traffic."
Perhaps the ‘Save Whalley Village’ activists should speak the ‘Save Guide Village’ (of 2003 vintage) activists, and check the bonefides of Capita Symonds and its staff. They obviously got the planning wrong at Guide – witness the recent large overhaul of the M65 junction, aimed mainly at modifying the exit slip road to allow room for ‘blue light’ ambulances to get passed all the grid-locked traffic.
Still, other traffic management schemes like the Blackburn orbital route seem to be working well, and the Pelican crossing in High Street at Rishton has worked well after planners found HGVs couldn’t negotiate the ‘build outs’ and had to remove half them days after completing the scheme.
No doubt Save Whalley will be happy with their consultants report, but they should be aware that consultants usually produce the outcome that the people who are paying are expecting.
Good luck with the campaign!
6:48am Mon 21 May 12
2 for 5p says...
Lets just face it you just don't want anyone else living were you are living.
9:21am Mon 21 May 12
midas says...
9:31am Mon 21 May 12
Noiticer says...
10:07am Mon 21 May 12
Stuart Farquar says...
10:28am Mon 21 May 12
happycyclist says...
11:17am Mon 21 May 12
The Mouth says...
So narrow minded - we also pay income tax !!!
11:37am Mon 21 May 12
shytalk says...
They only have themselves to blame then for the desecration of their village..Am sure they will be happy now that the tory planning authority and councillors have all got their brown envelopes.
11:48am Mon 21 May 12
skippy1 says...
12:01pm Mon 21 May 12
skippy1 says...
1:01pm Mon 21 May 12
shytalk says...
1:35pm Mon 21 May 12
skippy1 says...
2:02pm Mon 21 May 12
bburnrover says...
2:58pm Mon 21 May 12
midas says...
3:43pm Mon 21 May 12
did you smash it? says...
.
You set of snot-nosed carrot crunchers need to get real you are nothing special, your village is in fact mainly a dump and your holier-than-thou and condescending attitude as displayed by posters like skippy1 is a disgrace.
6:45pm Mon 21 May 12
wrinkles says...
7:32pm Mon 21 May 12
2 for 5p says...
1200 new homes would be another aprox 5000 people.
Weather there built in whalley or Blackburn you'll need another doctor larger school whatever.
The country is expanding and places like whalley are ideal places for it
9:04pm Mon 21 May 12
Mike Harper says...
And what has it got to do with being middle class or otherwise? Or being an 'incomer'? I was born in the village - does that mean my opinion should count for more? Of course not.
And can't anyone who posts here spell?
12:27am Tue 22 May 12
wrinkles says...
If you did geography at school you'd have learned that we live in a temperate climate which yields the highest growth of food/crops. The world should be putting buildngs on barren land. When you've covered our land with buildings, where will the next generations find food?
9:27am Tue 22 May 12
2 for 5p says...
10:22am Tue 22 May 12
Steve Rush says...
Our council's infrastructure plan to deal with this extra influx of people and cars contains the following:
No extra car parking
No change to the road network
No traffic management scheme
No extra doctors
No extra schools (primary or secondary)
No extra sports facilities
No guarantees water and wastewater can be accommodated
No guarantees for refuse collection
There are lots more issues this large amount of extra houses will generate that the council cannot address. Surely it is not unreasonable to point out important parts of infrastructure shortages to existing and potential new residents.
Surely it is also not unreasonable to defend the area you live in whether it be a town or a village.
11:39am Tue 22 May 12
Noiticer says...
6:51pm Wed 23 May 12
Scott Gant says...
7:30pm Wed 23 May 12
Coeur de Lion says...