Report this comment
  • "
    britguy wrote:
    Why are the words danger-ous, manage-ment, guid-ance and chair-man hyphenated. This is surely incorrect or at least it is according to the Cambridge dictionary...do they spell these words differently in Lancashire.
    I heard a story in the pub the other day that LT news articles are proof-read in India before release.

    There has to be a reason for it because it has been commented on time and time again. I simply can't believe that the reporters file articles like this.

    LT?"
  • This field is mandatory
  • This field is mandatory
  • Please note we will not accept reports with HTML tags or URLs in them.


  • Enter the above word in the box below

Ribble Valley charity run axed on safety grounds

Lancashire Telegraph: popular: Runners in last year’s event popular: Runners in last year’s event

A CHARITY race which was set to attract 1,000 runners has been axed just days before it was due to go ahead.

Organisers have been forced to cancel the Read and Simonstone Run this Saturday after being told they had not met safety regulations.

The people behind the 2.7-mile run, which has taken place through the villages for the past three years, said they had not received enough support from the Ribble Valley Event Safety Advisory Group.

But the safety group said it had repeatedly asked for details of a traffic manag-ement plan, which had not been forthcoming.

Warren Eastham, event organiser, said: “We are only amateurs at organising events and we haven’t been given any support, or guid-ance. We were told we needed a road closure order which the traffic manage-ment company would deal with, but we didn’t know what to ask for.”

The organisers were told they needed to close the A671, the sixth most danger-ous road in the country.

Mr Eastham said the event had gone ahead in previous years with a rolling road block provided by police.

The run was set to raise £5,000 for Macmillan Cancer Support and a cystic fibrosis charity.

Chris Shuttleworth, chair-man of the safety advisory group, said they had supp-orted the event. He added: “We have provided time and advice at a number of meetings with the orga-nisers and repeatedly asked for details of a traffic manag-ement plan.

“This was not forthcoming and on September 1 we contacted the event organ-isers to move the matter forward.

“We were informed the event management plan had not been finalised, as the traffic management company had been changed, hence there was a delay.

"The event organisers were invited to a further meeting on September 6, at which, despite all our best efforts, we were unable to accept their proposals.”

Local Businesses

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree