Gotcha! Blackburn poppy tin thief caught (From Lancashire Telegraph)

12 weeks jail obviously wasn't long enough for him to learn his lesson, lock him up and threw away the key.

Good work LET.

Be careful, LET. If you call this vermin "despicable", you're probably infringing his human rights and putting in jeopardy his chances of getting a fair hearing!
.
Remember Austin Molloy!

He was very upset!!
Probably upset only because he was caught !!

The LT can obviously play a role in catching lowlifes like this. Let's have more cctv images! Well done LT.

I don't know how people like Scott Parker sleep at night, making a living defending scum like this.
Scott, get a grip, he isn't ashamed of himself at all. He's worthless lowlife scum who will say anything to reduce his sentence.

happycyclist wrote:
The LT can obviously play a role in catching lowlifes like this. Let's have more cctv images! Well done LT.

Though without the blooming adverts!

happycyclist wrote:
I don't know how people like Scott Parker sleep at night, making a living defending scum like this. Scott, get a grip, he isn't ashamed of himself at all. He's worthless lowlife scum who will say anything to reduce his sentence.

To be quite honest I am baffled as to why you don't understand how people defend scum like this.

Surely you must realise it is people of the ilk of Scott Parker and his industry that are bring the country to its knees.

The solicitors, barristers and law firms are making an absolute fortune out of seeing to the so called "rights" of Illegal Immigrants and constant offenders. It is these professionals who coach them in what to say and do so the fat cat lawyers can milk the system for all it is worth.

Yours sincerely "Disgusted" (at the scum being defended and those who defend them

Expect to see more of this scumbag soon. Bring back the stocks ! Well done LT

notchuffed wrote:

happycyclist wrote: I don't know how people like Scott Parker sleep at night, making a living defending scum like this. Scott, get a grip, he isn't ashamed of himself at all. He's worthless lowlife scum who will say anything to reduce his sentence.

To be quite honest I am baffled as to why you don't understand how people defend scum like this. Surely you must realise it is people of the ilk of Scott Parker and his industry that are bring the country to its knees. The solicitors, barristers and law firms are making an absolute fortune out of seeing to the so called "rights" of Illegal Immigrants and constant offenders. It is these professionals who coach them in what to say and do so the fat cat lawyers can milk the system for all it is worth. Yours sincerely "Disgusted" (at the scum being defended and those who defend them

Surely one of the rights that those who we remember on Armistice day fought for was the right to a fair trial. That includes legal representation, whatever the crime.
The defence counsel was almost certainly not one of those "fat cat" lawyers, just one of a number who provide this basic right to those (whether or not they deserve it) and who cannot afford to pay for it themselves.
Save your vitriol for those who do make a killing out of the the well off who seem to think they are above the law, or those who see "compensation" in every accident.

ladysal wrote:

notchuffed wrote:

happycyclist wrote: I don't know how people like Scott Parker sleep at night, making a living defending scum like this. Scott, get a grip, he isn't ashamed of himself at all. He's worthless lowlife scum who will say anything to reduce his sentence.

To be quite honest I am baffled as to why you don't understand how people defend scum like this. Surely you must realise it is people of the ilk of Scott Parker and his industry that are bring the country to its knees. The solicitors, barristers and law firms are making an absolute fortune out of seeing to the so called "rights" of Illegal Immigrants and constant offenders. It is these professionals who coach them in what to say and do so the fat cat lawyers can milk the system for all it is worth. Yours sincerely "Disgusted" (at the scum being defended and those who defend them

Surely one of the rights that those who we remember on Armistice day fought for was the right to a fair trial. That includes legal representation, whatever the crime. The defence counsel was almost certainly not one of those "fat cat" lawyers, just one of a number who provide this basic right to those (whether or not they deserve it) and who cannot afford to pay for it themselves. Save your vitriol for those who do make a killing out of the the well off who seem to think they are above the law, or those who see "compensation" in every accident.

True - The right to a defence is paramount in law. It is supposed to prevent the innocent being wrongly convicted. Yes, that means scumbags getting a defence, but even scumbags are innocent until proven guilty.

Maybe your frustration should be directed at the magistrates who are terrified of jailing anyone these days.

Sorry to put a dampener on this, do the staff involved not have acceess to thier own companies CCTV?

DID they have to see it via LET website?

LET still did a good service by showing the CCTV but I hope they were not trying to mislead us by vague reorting.

ossym wrote:
Sorry to put a dampener on this, do the staff involved not have acceess to thier own companies CCTV?

DID they have to see it via LET website?

LET still did a good service by showing the CCTV but I hope they were not trying to mislead us by vague reorting.

Crikey, you're a tough crowd eh!

Glass half empty perchance?

BuckoTheMoose wrote:

ladysal wrote:

notchuffed wrote:

happycyclist wrote: I don't know how people like Scott Parker sleep at night, making a living defending scum like this. Scott, get a grip, he isn't ashamed of himself at all. He's worthless lowlife scum who will say anything to reduce his sentence.

To be quite honest I am baffled as to why you don't understand how people defend scum like this. Surely you must realise it is people of the ilk of Scott Parker and his industry that are bring the country to its knees. The solicitors, barristers and law firms are making an absolute fortune out of seeing to the so called "rights" of Illegal Immigrants and constant offenders. It is these professionals who coach them in what to say and do so the fat cat lawyers can milk the system for all it is worth. Yours sincerely "Disgusted" (at the scum being defended and those who defend them

Surely one of the rights that those who we remember on Armistice day fought for was the right to a fair trial. That includes legal representation, whatever the crime. The defence counsel was almost certainly not one of those "fat cat" lawyers, just one of a number who provide this basic right to those (whether or not they deserve it) and who cannot afford to pay for it themselves. Save your vitriol for those who do make a killing out of the the well off who seem to think they are above the law, or those who see "compensation" in every accident.

True - The right to a defence is paramount in law. It is supposed to prevent the innocent being wrongly convicted. Yes, that means scumbags getting a defence, but even scumbags are innocent until proven guilty. Maybe your frustration should be directed at the magistrates who are terrified of jailing anyone these days.

Bucko and happycyclist.

Armistce day is one thing I will nevr forget having lost relatives in both WWs.

What I don't do is look at the world through rose tinted glasses. One thing I don't have is frustrations.

I agree the right to defence is paramount but you seem or choose to overlook all the wrongful advertising and defending done by solicitors/barrister
s in "No win No Fee situations and the well known fact that a) They instruct and teach clients on continual ways to find loopholes in our legal system so they can rack up bigger fees.
b) There is practically a separate arm within the legal system specifically set up to again milk the system under Human rights etc.

I really think it is time that the public became aware of the damage these sort of practices are doing to the economy in the same way the Banking system did.

Every £1 they put into their accounts in cases such as this comes out of the pockets of people who work and pay taxes.

Clear the tints from your glasses and wake up to what is happening or are you "preferential clients" as well?

Put him infront of the troops and let him explain his deeds to them.

**** !!!

notchuffed, what do you mean by "are you a preferential client?"

I'm neither a lawyer nor a thieving scumbag.

happycyclist wrote:
The LT can obviously play a role in catching lowlifes like this. Let's have more cctv images! Well done LT.

'i still have visions of the advert when i close my eyes.I'm so happy he as been caught so i no longer have to watch the part of it were the telegraph make their buck from crime.

And the scumbag responsible will get a warm welcome in jail from ex service men who have fallen on hard times and find themselves in the same position as the scumbag that stole from them.If it was up to me i would have sent the scumbag to Afghanistan picking up road side tins and take bets on how many he can find before he joins the service men in the afterlife who can then make things even more intrestring for him 'for more nastier than any of us mere mortals can think of'...say yes to a New World Order and say goodbye to this sort of scum...W.P.O

notchuffed wrote:

BuckoTheMoose wrote:

ladysal wrote:

notchuffed wrote:

happycyclist wrote: I don't know how people like Scott Parker sleep at night, making a living defending scum like this. Scott, get a grip, he isn't ashamed of himself at all. He's worthless lowlife scum who will say anything to reduce his sentence.

To be quite honest I am baffled as to why you don't understand how people defend scum like this. Surely you must realise it is people of the ilk of Scott Parker and his industry that are bring the country to its knees. The solicitors, barristers and law firms are making an absolute fortune out of seeing to the so called "rights" of Illegal Immigrants and constant offenders. It is these professionals who coach them in what to say and do so the fat cat lawyers can milk the system for all it is worth. Yours sincerely "Disgusted" (at the scum being defended and those who defend them

Surely one of the rights that those who we remember on Armistice day fought for was the right to a fair trial. That includes legal representation, whatever the crime. The defence counsel was almost certainly not one of those "fat cat" lawyers, just one of a number who provide this basic right to those (whether or not they deserve it) and who cannot afford to pay for it themselves. Save your vitriol for those who do make a killing out of the the well off who seem to think they are above the law, or those who see "compensation" in every accident.

True - The right to a defence is paramount in law. It is supposed to prevent the innocent being wrongly convicted. Yes, that means scumbags getting a defence, but even scumbags are innocent until proven guilty. Maybe your frustration should be directed at the magistrates who are terrified of jailing anyone these days.

Bucko and happycyclist. Armistce day is one thing I will nevr forget having lost relatives in both WWs. What I don't do is look at the world through rose tinted glasses. One thing I don't have is frustrations. I agree the right to defence is paramount but you seem or choose to overlook all the wrongful advertising and defending done by solicitors/barrister s in "No win No Fee situations and the well known fact that a) They instruct and teach clients on continual ways to find loopholes in our legal system so they can rack up bigger fees. b) There is practically a separate arm within the legal system specifically set up to again milk the system under Human rights etc. I really think it is time that the public became aware of the damage these sort of practices are doing to the economy in the same way the Banking system did. Every £1 they put into their accounts in cases such as this comes out of the pockets of people who work and pay taxes. Clear the tints from your glasses and wake up to what is happening or are you "preferential clients" as well?

"are you "preferential clients" as well? "

I have used a court appointed solicitor for a speeding offence. He was great and all he got paid was the court fee.

This chap will have also been using the court appointed chap.

I totally agree with your stance on ambulance chasers and human rights lawyers, but I don't think that was the type of lawyer used here.

At least now we can put a face to you scumbag

Forget jail, just send him to the front line.

QuarryGang78 wrote:

happycyclist wrote: The LT can obviously play a role in catching lowlifes like this. Let's have more cctv images! Well done LT.

'i still have visions of the advert when i close my eyes.I'm so happy he as been caught so i no longer have to watch the part of it were the telegraph make their buck from crime. And the scumbag responsible will get a warm welcome in jail from ex service men who have fallen on hard times and find themselves in the same position as the scumbag that stole from them.If it was up to me i would have sent the scumbag to Afghanistan picking up road side tins and take bets on how many he can find before he joins the service men in the afterlife who can then make things even more intrestring for him 'for more nastier than any of us mere mortals can think of'...say yes to a New World Order and say goodbye to this sort of scum...W.P.O

Quarry Gang 78, you complete and utter tit.If the NWO was brought in tomorrow it would be absolute hell for the likes of you and me:body scanners everywhere,trial without jury, political dissidents going "missing" a suspension of free speach. and all round hell and slavery.Wake up you twit if you seriously want a NWO then you need help

I'm glad he has been caught, let's hope now that we are not let down by the Justice system.

Michael@ClitheroeSin
ce58 wrote:
I'm glad he has been caught, let's hope now that we are not let down by the Justice system.

let's hope so.


(I miss the 'you don't know him' lunatics)

Keith Myath wrote:
Be careful, LET. If you call this vermin "despicable", you're probably infringing his human rights and putting in jeopardy his chances of getting a fair hearing!
.
Remember Austin Molloy!

This is a fair comment. As much as I abhor the original offence in question, people should realise that this type of trial by media can only serve the perpetrator of the crime. Until a sentence is passed people should be happy that somebody is in custody and that a guilty plea has been put forward. Mark my words, his defence will refer to the outrage of the public.

What a scum bag! !!!

do we really have to chain our charity boxes? is this what the world has come to? get heroin off our streets.

1) bullet
2) head
3) BBQ
4) Mmmm fried criminal on toast!
5) perfect Britain!

"He said: “He is thoroughly ashamed of himself and was very upset when I spoke to him in custody this morning.


"...........I doubt if this is true.He needs a good kicking.

Such righteous indignation!
A thief gets caught stealing from collection tins and the bandwagon groans under the weight of those who leap upon it. I wonder how many pounds were donated to the Poppy (Haig) Fund by the 'whited sepulchres' who put finger to keyboard.
Yes, the crime was as despicable as it was petty perhaps the magistrates could have ordered a period of drug rehabilitation after a custodial sentence, perhaps we need to look more closely at a more effective way of treating offenders, possibly estimating the amount stolen from the various charities (for example £600) and put the man to work until he had repaid the money. Then we would have the same voices complaining that "scum-bags" (what a disgusting Americanism), were taking the jobs away from honest folk!
I have no idea of the age range of contributors to these posts, or their reason for their antipathy to lawyers. As usual, it is most likely to be the politics of envy. Get off your bums go down to the Tech book an Access to HE course, go to uni, study law ergo you will be a 'fat cat'. But remember, while this chap was being filmed, children were being abused, people mugged and murdered, he is one criminal among so many. But then poor old Mrs X doesn't have the appeal of the men and women sent to a useless war in Afghanistan or other places the American masters command their poodles to go.

Walsh wrote:

Keith Myath wrote:
Be careful, LET. If you call this vermin "despicable", you're probably infringing his human rights and putting in jeopardy his chances of getting a fair hearing!
.
Remember Austin Molloy!

This is a fair comment. As much as I abhor the original offence in question, people should realise that this type of trial by media can only serve the perpetrator of the crime. Until a sentence is passed people should be happy that somebody is in custody and that a guilty plea has been put forward. Mark my words, his defence will refer to the outrage of the public.

Hang on… that's not what I meant at all! I was being sarcastic!
.
He's vile scum, and may he rot in hell!