Accrington RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


LT block logo JOIN THE DEBATE BY ADDING YOUR COMMENTS ON THESE STORIES

Registering to post comments on the Lancashire Telegraph website only takes a few seconds. Click here to go to the registration page.

Music bills put Accrington traders in a spin


INDEPENDENT traders say they can no longer afford to play music following a crackdown by a royalties collecting agency.

Shops, cafes and salons in Warner Street and Abbey Street were handed music licensing bills dating back a number of years this week from a music licensing company traders say they didn’t know existed.

Affected businesses say they pay annual fees of around £140 to the Performing Rights Society, which collects royalties for songwriters and publishers. However inspectors from a separate agency this week doorstepped businesses demanding a second licence is also paid for.

Inspectors were from the PPL, previously known as Phonographic Performance Ltd, which pays royalties to record companies and performers.

Businesses were quoted fees of £65 for radio, or £130 to play CDs. However hairstylists claim they were told to pay for multiple licenses ‘per seat’ while others were given back-dated invoice amounts of up to three years.

Coun Collette McCormack, who owns Warner Street shop J & C McCormack, said the PPL had informed her they were currently targeting the BB5 postcode.

She said: “Many shops, including myself, thought we were covered - there’s a complete lack of information on it. Plus it makes no sense to charge for the same thing twice, the cost is ridiculous for small businesses.

“They are also a private company and not regulated by anyone, which makes it hard for anyone to look into the fairness of it.”

Warner Street cafe owner Liron Asulin said: “We have reached the point where we just can’t afford to pay any more licenses. It’s horrible to be without music in a cafe but it’s a lot of money.

Businesses are struggling right now anyway, it’s very sad so many should be targeted in this way.”

A spokeswoman for the PPL said they were a not-for-profit service: “PPL operates under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act, 1988 and it is a legal requirement for businesses to have a PPL licence when music is played in public.

“There are many benefits to using music in the workplace, it can increase productivity, improve staff morale and can have significant financial rewards.”

Last month it said it made payments of £840,000 to its member artists.

Comments(12)

happycyclist says...
3:13pm Sat 4 Sep 10

The PPL would be doing us all a service by targetting all the idiots who play loud music from their cars as they're driving around and all the scum who play loud music at all hours of day or night at home with all their windows open. That's music in public which the public don't want to hear.

Stone Island says...
3:21pm Sat 4 Sep 10

happycyclist wrote:
The PPL would be doing us all a service by targetting all the idiots who play loud music from their cars as they're driving around and all the scum who play loud music at all hours of day or night at home with all their windows open. That's music in public which the public don't want to hear.
Thats a very good point. Is there anything more annoying than having that 'music' forced upon us? I think a lot of the youth of today will end up stone deaf, stone deaf i say!

iasiah fartwell says...
3:36pm Sat 4 Sep 10

what!

full moon says...
4:42pm Sat 4 Sep 10

I`d be glad of some silence in these places. I don`t need to be serenaded about some lost love, or how best to drown my sorrows! All I want is to get in and out of these places with whatever i have bought. Oh and that includes them then irritating hairdressers!

CliveE says...
5:42pm Sat 4 Sep 10

If you play music that is over 50 years old,you do not have to pay.
Let's all get those Cliff,Elvis,Perry Como and Buddy Holly records out :)

mavrick says...
5:56pm Sat 4 Sep 10

more greed it seems, how many times do these artists need paying for the same work? everybody should stick together and tell these greedy scumbags to shove their licence. I am sure it would not be long in coming to a more satisfactory arrangement, As for business users i doubt it will affect your business, try it and see.

CliveE says...
6:00pm Sat 4 Sep 10

By any one or more of the following:
• television
• radio
For up to and including 30 stylist/treatment chairs ................
£69.62

By compact disc or equivalent,
For the first 5 stylist/treatment chairs ....................
.............
£69.62
For every additional 5 (or part thereof)
stylist/treatment chairs ....................
.....
£25.32 is the actual cost that they should be charged.I have no idea why it should be more to play a CD,maybe because the music is constant and not interupted by mindless drivel and DJs ,most of whom love the sound of their own voices, talking over the start and end of records that we have paid to listen to.

pez63 says...
6:08pm Sat 4 Sep 10

Park your cars outside your businesses and turn the sterio up full and Pornographic Porformance Ltd can take a run and jump for any licence extortion fees.Simples.

Lifeinthemix says...
12:12pm Sun 5 Sep 10

Well you businesses...lifeint
hemix has a back catologue of music, and access to a massive grouping of active artists....Perhaps we can come to some sort of arrangement whereby you can continue to play music.
.
lifeinthemix22@yahoo
.com

brolyat says...
2:51pm Sun 5 Sep 10

pez63 wrote:
Park your cars outside your businesses and turn the sterio up full and Pornographic Porformance Ltd can take a run and jump for any licence extortion fees.Simples.
"Phonographic Performance Ltd"

mikebuk says...
4:45pm Sun 5 Sep 10

The PPL could collect payment rights going back up to 6 years.

It was set-up to make it easy for artists to get their royalties from music played to avoid having to contact each one individually.

BuckoTheMoose says...
1:35pm Mon 6 Sep 10

Anyone who has received one of these bills, take the following advice. Stop playing CDs and switch to radio. Radio stations pay their own hefty PPL fee in order to broadcast music. No business who plays the radio has to pay again, even though PPL have started to chance it over the past few years. They expect people will pay up rather than challenging it.
If you do get any trouble, I would reccomend challeging them to take you to court. They won't.
Ive had some experience in this area in the past.


Most popular


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Local Businesses