When news happens, text LT and your photos and videos to 80360. Or contact us by email or phone.
|
|
JOIN THE DEBATE BY ADDING YOUR COMMENTS ON THESE STORIES Registering to post comments on the Lancashire Telegraph website only takes a few seconds. Click here to go to the registration page. |
3:48pm Sunday 7th February 2010 in
UP to £1.9billion of Lancashire taxpayers’ money is set to be spent on a huge new computer contract.
In an unprecedented move, County Hall is advertising for a private-sector computer giant to help it run all of Lancashire’s IT network.
Unions said they were “concerned” about the implications for jobs in what could become Europe’s biggest IT contract.
Bosses say the 10-year deal will save taxpayers money and make services more efficient.
Police and fire authorities as well as district councils will be invited to join the contract, which is being targeted at the likes of IBM and BT.
The scale of the partnership would dwarf Blackburn with Darwen Council’s partnership with Capita Symonds, signed nine years ago.
It has already been put out to tender, and Phil Halsall, Lancashire executive director for resources, said a final decision would be made in the autumn.
A statement by the county council said the changes “had nothing to do with job cuts”.
It said: “We think the best way to continue improving our services to people in Lancashire and to save money is to form a partnership with a private company.”
Under the contract, a new company would be created between the winning bidder and the council, and would be jointly-owned by both parties.
Mr Halsall insisted this meant the arrangement would not be “outsourcing” like the government’s NHS computer contracts that were branded “catastrophic” by opposition parties.
It would have an initial value of £47million which would increase as more work was transferred into the deal.
A total of £1.9billion could go into the contract over the 10 years.
The private company would lend staff to the company and advise how services like HR and payroll, print services and running the pensions system could be made more efficient.
Council workers would be seconded to the company on the same terms and conditions.
Unison rep Carol Lukey said: “This is just outsourcing.
"If it doesn’t work out, or there turns out to be more people than are needed, which is probably the case if they are trying to save money, of course it concerns us.”
Comments(7)
district01
says...
7:00pm Sun 7 Feb 10
Lifeinthemix
says...
11:42pm Sun 7 Feb 10
Mikeee47
says...
12:09pm Mon 8 Feb 10
Richard_Nelson
says...
1:12pm Mon 8 Feb 10
jogalot
says...
1:28pm Mon 8 Feb 10
Richard_Nelson wrote:Totally agree, execs who know nothing about IT always seem to think "Let's get the experts in and everything will be OK". But there are no experts, IT is a constant learning curve, the best experts for the job are those already working there. If it needs to be more efficient and effective, employ some more staff.
£1.9 Billion on an IT contract??? How can LCC afford this? I understand it's over 10 years but that works out at £190 Million per year. That's a hugh sum of money to be spending just on IT. Also District01's comments are totally true, look at the NHS contract, it had hugh over runs, not just in costs but in the time scale needed to setup. The other thing is firms do cut corners to make profits. Why can't LCC keep it's IT under its self!!! I'm totally against this.
Michael@ClitheroeSince58
says...
8:58pm Mon 8 Feb 10
Enter your postcode, town or place name
Search jobs in and around Lancashire
Search Now »
Find the right person for you
Search Now »
Search houses, flats, and all properties
Search Now »
Search new & used cars in and around Lancashire
Search Now »
chrislancs says...
4:08pm Sun 7 Feb 10