Send us your news tips, photos and videos Text LT and your message to 80360 or click here for more ways to contact us »
REGISTER NOW TO POST YOUR COMMENTS ON THESE STORIES
It's free and only takes a few seconds. Click here to go to the registration page.
4:06pm Friday 25th April 2008
Blackburn town hall has seen its fair share of twists and turns in the past year, and there could well be plenty more after May 1.
Going into the election, the balance of power is held by three councillors who have all become independent since last May - Arif Waghat, Michael Johnson and Yusuf Sidat.
Labour needs to take two seats, and not lose any, to regain overall control of the council.
In Blackburn, Liberal Democrat and Conservative candidates are not standing against each other - although party leaders insist this is a coincidence and no deal has been done.
But in Darwen the battle will be fierce as the For Darwen group, which was largely responsible for Labour's losses last year, fields another seven candidates. Party leader Tony Melia could be in a strong strategic position if power sharing is discussed when the dust settles, although For Darwen is down to two councillors after Coun Johnson left the party.
Council leader Tory Colin Rigby is up for election in North Turton with Tockholes, as is regeneration executive member Alan Cottam, although both are regarded as safe Tory seats.
Labour stalwart Dave Smith could face a stiff challenge from Andrew Graham of For Darwen, which won a seat in Coun Smith's Sunnyhurst ward last time around.
But it is likely four tightly-contested wards - Earcroft, Marsh House, Little Harwood and Corporation Park - could hold the key to power.
Marsh House is a major Labour target, where Kevin Connor is being challenged by former Labour adult social care chief Frank Connor, as well as Tory and For Darwen candidates.
Lib Dem Abdul Rehman's Corporation Park seat could be under threat from Labour candidate Shaukat Hussain, and in LIttle Harwood, Labour's Abdul Patel will face a stiff challenge from Tory candidate Imran Khan.
Earcroft, where one of the seats was taken by the For Darwen Party last year, will see Labour's Moira Barrett under pressure from Lib Dem, For Darwen, Conservative and England First.
Seats held by two retiring Labour councillors are also up for grabs - Hussain Akhtar in Shear Brow, and Jim Blackburn, in Shadsworth with Whitebirk.
Two independent candidates, Trevor Holden (Roe Lee) and Francis Apaloo (Shear Brow) are standing.
thomas, Darwen says...
6:24pm Fri 25 Apr 08
brossen99, says...
7:38pm Fri 25 Apr 08
dickyhead, says...
9:09pm Fri 25 Apr 08
ononsg, says...
9:13pm Fri 25 Apr 08
brossen99 wrote:You were not wrong my friend
It was going to be a letter but the thought police at LET wouldn\\\'t publish it.
j.vani, says...
1:20am Sat 26 Apr 08
Dave Smith, Darwen says...
11:54am Sat 26 Apr 08
Kick Labour out of Darwen., Darwen on says...
1:11pm Sat 26 Apr 08
Councillor Michael Johnson, Home says...
1:34pm Sat 26 Apr 08
THE ORIGINAL REALIST, Darwen says...
2:13pm Sat 26 Apr 08
Andy B, Darwen says...
2:49pm Sat 26 Apr 08
soap opera, coronation st says...
9:54pm Sat 26 Apr 08
Apolitical, Darwen says...
3:14pm Sun 27 Apr 08
BigPete, darwen says...
8:40pm Sun 27 Apr 08
THE ORIGINAL REALIST, Darwen says...
10:04pm Sun 27 Apr 08
Wilky, BLACKPOOL says...
10:37pm Sun 27 Apr 08
JH, darwen says...
12:06pm Mon 28 Apr 08
Darwen Patriot, Lancashire says...
12:12pm Mon 28 Apr 08
Councillor Michael Johnson wrote:Most of that is true. However only about half of the For Darwen Party founders were ex-BNP or Ex-EFP. Some were former Lib-Dems. What is odd is why did For Darwen Party leader Tony Melia stand AGAINST the Darwen independents in 2004 in Earcroft? Why was he against an independent Darwen then - but says he for a Darwen town council now? I voted for Max last year - but I'm NOT voting for For Darwen this time - whats the point - they are just as bad as the rest of them.
Why cant For Darwen members post under their own Names. It is disgusting that they post under the name of Dave Smith when i know he has not placed this post. Unfortunatly for some members of For Darwen they have not got the ability to keep their mouths shut when drinking in the pub. Leading members of For Darwen were in the Engineers pub Thursday night saying my wife was out leafletting for england First which is untrue. She was actually picking up Sam Stones daughter and looking after her. If the members who have stated this would like to ask Sam he will put them right no problem. A customer of the pub phoned me up and told me they were stiring things up in the Engin. Is this the standard of councillor you want? Last night Tony Melia and for darwen members were out canvasing Earcroft (friday) i am sure they would have noticed my wife if she was in the same area leafletting. She was part of the party committe. It is a joke realy as qutie a lot of the members of For Darwen are Ex supporters of BNP and Canversers of BNP. You also seemt to have forgot that Most of the main players were full supporters of England First some who stood for EFP and leafleted and canvased for them. All the leaflets For Darwen use are England First Leaflets they are only being allowed to use them because EFP are allowing them to do so this is because EFP have the copyrite. Tony Melia attempted to copyrite the last For Darwen leaflet wich it strange as i designed it and most of the wording on it is mine, never mind the fact that the photographs are the sole property of my wife who is a proffesional photographer and all her pictures are covered by copyrite. The For Darwen party have not been given permission to use any of the pictuers or information. So lets get real Who is conning who? Stealing my design, my ideas, my wifes photographs and attempting to steal the glory for the new Darwen Stadiun which i sorted out for the club and the council. I can prove all the above without any problem as all the above is FACT. Can Tony Melia and for darwen prove me wrong? TALK ABOUT PEOPLE IN GLASS HOUSES.
Councillor Michael Johnson, says...
12:52pm Mon 28 Apr 08
Andy B wrote:Andy, Quite right and a fair question. I have been waiting for some one to look at what is being stated and question the facts without just srunning people down.
Cllr Johnson - you stated above \"It is a joke realy as qutie a lot of the members of For Darwen are Ex supporters of BNP and Canversers of BNP.\" As an Ex-For Darwen member, and a man who has proclaimed himself as one of the forming members of the party, were you aware that supporters of the BNP were helping you canvas. If you did, why did you not state this at the time? Why are you only doing it now, when you have left/kicked out (depending on who you believe)?
Fed up with anti-labour propganda, Darwen says...
4:36pm Mon 28 Apr 08
Apolitical wrote:Arrrrrrrrraggggghhhh
There is great opposition to Labour nationally . The Labour Party is currently made up of Stalinists, Trotskyists, Old and New Labour, they themselves are a coalition. Even BwD Council administration has a former Militant Tendency member in a senior position, and for 20 years or more Labour has been appointing Labour supporters into council jobs, just as they have politicised the Civil Service, which was unheard of ten or more years ago. For parties who oppose these left wing extremists to decide not to stand against each other is a sensible step, why split the vote and put a party in power that you do not want. That is crass stupidity, when a coalition is in being not that I am too content with them, they should appoint a better leader, someone who is up front. We have seen Labour candidates scurrying from door to door promising house owners that their homes were to be refurbished and within months of the election Labour were Compulsorily Purchasing those same homes. That happened at Redearth and they allotted the land to a Labour Party donor to build an Academy he was investigated as part of the Cash for Honours enquiry, but of course the Director of Public Prosecutions declared there was no evidence of corruption, as could be expected. He was not made aware that houses had been corruptly declared unfit by council employees, who were not qualified and a Public Enquiry reversed that decision. Some home owners had accepted valuations for their homes below market value an absolute travesty and wholly dishonest. We see politicians of all colours taking unfair advantage (too mild a word) of the expenses available to them at the expense of taxpayers you and me. I would suggest that the major offenders are Labour M.Ps. If you want fairness in the coming Local Elections vote anything but Labour. It would be nice to see Parliament governed by a coalition anything but Labour. I have said before, I am not politically aligned, there is no party which represents the middle Englishman, but I am a Democrat.
sour Grapes, Earcroft says...
5:06pm Mon 28 Apr 08
Councillor Michael Johnson wrote:Gosh he must have eaten a whole bunch of bad grapes.
Why cant For Darwen members post under their own Names. It is disgusting that they post under the name of Dave Smith when i know he has not placed this post. Unfortunatly for some members of For Darwen they have not got the ability to keep their mouths shut when drinking in the pub. Leading members of For Darwen were in the Engineers pub Thursday night saying my wife was out leafletting for england First which is untrue. She was actually picking up Sam Stones daughter and looking after her. If the members who have stated this would like to ask Sam he will put them right no problem. A customer of the pub phoned me up and told me they were stiring things up in the Engin. Is this the standard of councillor you want? Last night Tony Melia and for darwen members were out canvasing Earcroft (friday) i am sure they would have noticed my wife if she was in the same area leafletting. She was part of the party committe. It is a joke realy as qutie a lot of the members of For Darwen are Ex supporters of BNP and Canversers of BNP. You also seemt to have forgot that Most of the main players were full supporters of England First some who stood for EFP and leafleted and canvased for them. All the leaflets For Darwen use are England First Leaflets they are only being allowed to use them because EFP are allowing them to do so this is because EFP have the copyrite. Tony Melia attempted to copyrite the last For Darwen leaflet wich it strange as i designed it and most of the wording on it is mine, never mind the fact that the photographs are the sole property of my wife who is a proffesional photographer and all her pictures are covered by copyrite. The For Darwen party have not been given permission to use any of the pictuers or information. So lets get real Who is conning who? Stealing my design, my ideas, my wifes photographs and attempting to steal the glory for the new Darwen Stadiun which i sorted out for the club and the council. I can prove all the above without any problem as all the above is FACT. Can Tony Melia and for darwen prove me wrong? TALK ABOUT PEOPLE IN GLASS HOUSES.
Apolitical, Darwen says...
9:38pm Mon 28 Apr 08
Jacquie, Home says...
12:20pm Tue 29 Apr 08
Add your comment
Register for a FREE Lancashire Telegraph account and you can have your say on today's news and sport by adding comments on articles we publish. The best comments may even get published in the paper.
Please register now or sign in below to continue.
Enter your postcode, town or place name
Search jobs in and around Lancashire
Search Now »
Find the right person for you
Search Now »
Search houses, flats, and all properties
Search Now »
Search new & used cars in and around Lancashire
Search Now »
brossen99, says...
5:04pm Fri 25 Apr 08
The alleged road safety benefits are less than clear, heavily traffic calmed Burnley reported a 44% reduction in child deaths over the past seven years, yet Ribble Valley with minimal traffic calming also reported a fall of 42%. It would appear that traffic calming has become a TB infested sacred cow for the eco-fascist leaning groups like FoE who were originally and still campaign for its introduction.
It must be reasonable to believe that if politicians continue to introduce traffic calming, anything else they claim to do allegedly in the interest of combating global warming is little more than a marketing scam aimed at those with a lower than average IQ or just poorly educated in science.
When you consider that traffic calming encourages the ownership of large 4 by 4's in towns which further increase the potential pollution generated by traffic, and the only beneficiaries are oil companies and other corporate interests its a bad deal for the people not just the planet. Traffic calming is yet another example of politically inspired false economic growth which limits our ability to compete in the global economy.
Any government serious about protecting the global environment would be actively removing traffic calming from the streets, perhaps its time we got back to true British values as portrayed in the monolog " The Lion and Albert " as far as road safety is concerned.
Speeding can be addressed in most cases by the provision of simple flashing warning signs, but the empty speed cameras at each end of the village of Copster Green on the A59 appear to work admirably in keeping traffic to the 40 Mph limit. The relatively inexpensive measure of simply painting speed camera timing lines on the road at strategic places could also be proven to work for controlling speed without increasing pollution.
I suspect that politicians cling to their quasi-religious position on traffic calming in order to protect the raft of overpaid parasites who design such schemes. Perhaps the money spent on traffic calming could be spent more wisely and efficiently on other areas of council service or simply keeping the roads adequately repaired.