East Lancashire children to be taught languages from seven upwards (From Lancashire Telegraph)
When news happens, text LT and your photos and videos to 80360. Or contact us by email or phone.
East Lancashire children to be taught languages from seven upwards
4:00pm Tuesday 12th June 2012 in News
By Nafeesa Shan, Reporter
LEARNING CURVE The aim is for all pupils from seven upwards to be taught foreign languages
CHILDREN in East Lancashire aged from seven upwards will be taught a foreign language as part of new measures to be introduced by top education bosses.
But children as young as four in the area are already taught a foreign language in some primary schools, it has been revealed.
Education Secretary Michael Gove is set to put forward proposals to make learning a foreign language compulsory for pupils from the age of seven.
Under the plans primary schools could offer lessons in Mandarin, Latin and Greek as well as French, German and Spanish from September 2014.
Ministers said that equipping children with foreign language skills was essential to allow them to compete in a global economy and support economic growth in future.
Simoni Anders, year four teacher responsible for primary modern languages at Haslingden Primary School, said: “We teach in Spanish after there was a big, big drive from government to teach languages in primary school.
“We started teaching it to children in reception and carried on even though it wasn’t made compulsory.
“We are really excited that it could be compulsory by 2014.
“However when we carried out an audit and we found teachers had some basic French and Spanish, and while there were some free courses, funding for other language courses had stopped.
“We are actually finding that teachers and children are now learning together.
“Learning languages creates opportunities. It gives children a global dimension.
“It teaches them respect and awareness of other children in school who might already speak another language.”
Deborah Thorpe, Westholme School French teacher, who teaches the language from year one children upwards, said: “You can see the real progression when children learn another language.
“But it was supposed to be mandatory in 2007-2008 and most primary schools are teaching some form of language.”
Bob Stott, Lancashire County Council's director with responsibility for schools, said: "Our specialist advisers have been working closely with our schools for the last five years to enable and encourage language teaching in primary schools.
"Around 90 per cent of primary schools currently teach at least one language, usually French or Spanish.
“And the children enjoy it very much."
Comments(12)
Twicki1
says...
4:40pm Tue 12 Jun 12
Keith Myath
says...
4:54pm Tue 12 Jun 12
Twicki1 wrote:I had understood the previous contributor's message to be that English already IS a foreign language in plenty of Blackburn schools (but I could be wrong).
About time this was done, its been know for a long time that the younger they learn a language the better they arer at it. And my little boy is 6 and I have to say the improvement in his grammar, writing and spelling at his age is far more advanced than what was previously required. So in answer to the previous message they are doing.
superyob
says...
5:04pm Tue 12 Jun 12
Keith Myath wrote:Agree with izanears.......... why teach foreign languages when most of those who already live here and attend school, STILL wont/cant speak ENGLISH, (even after 4 generations) This should also be a condition on being allowed to enter & stay in the UK Lets teach English 1st. A second European languge could be an option, later on...........
Twicki1 wrote:I had understood the previous contributor's message to be that English already IS a foreign language in plenty of Blackburn schools (but I could be wrong).
About time this was done, its been know for a long time that the younger they learn a language the better they arer at it. And my little boy is 6 and I have to say the improvement in his grammar, writing and spelling at his age is far more advanced than what was previously required. So in answer to the previous message they are doing.
superyob
says...
5:07pm Tue 12 Jun 12
superyob wrote:* a second European language !!
Keith Myath wrote:Agree with izanears.......... why teach foreign languages when most of those who already live here and attend school, STILL wont/cant speak ENGLISH, (even after 4 generations) This should also be a condition on being allowed to enter & stay in the UK Lets teach English 1st. A second European languge could be an option, later on...........
Twicki1 wrote:I had understood the previous contributor's message to be that English already IS a foreign language in plenty of Blackburn schools (but I could be wrong).
About time this was done, its been know for a long time that the younger they learn a language the better they arer at it. And my little boy is 6 and I have to say the improvement in his grammar, writing and spelling at his age is far more advanced than what was previously required. So in answer to the previous message they are doing.
Iftikhar
says...
5:16pm Tue 12 Jun 12
Children that can speak more than one languages do better overall in learning and it will help them excel in a job when they are older. Only an idiot would think that being bi/trilingual is a bad thing. I think its great to be surrounded by foreign languages. There are plenty of benefits to learning them, it increases memory and other brain functions, looks great on a job résumé, and most importantly allows you to connect with a different culture and make new friends. Now is the time to teach them all the different languages you want to because they will just soak up the information. As we get older it becomes harder and harder to retrain our brains to learn a new language.
The earlier kids start learning a Foreign language the better and certainly before they are old enough for prejudices to have set in. Five years old would be better really. The younger kids are the faster they pick up languages. It's uncanny how the very young take to picking up languages. I speak from personal experience with my own young.This is a good start and sure there could be plenty of young foreigners here who could put their foreign languages to use rather than rocking up at the "dole" office - provided they have no predatory tendencies. ehem! It's easier to learn a language when you are younger. Also learning a foreign language helps you understand your own. Although I would want them to be taught this from the first day in school, not putting it off for a few years.
Becoming fluent in secondary school. Dream on! This just goes to show how very little government and its advisors know about the acquisition of a foreign language. I expect the usual carcrash of a curriculum. Majority of children cannot even speak the Standard English to start with. laudable aim Mr G but where will you get the staff from? The workforce survey showed that secondary schools are short of over two thousand language teachers. Foreign languages should only be taught by native speakers.
IA
http://www.londonsch
oolofislamics.org.uk
burner
says...
5:21pm Tue 12 Jun 12
@ parents of native British stock . . . English skills are declining because of lazy speech habits. Writing / spelling / grammar . .all in retreat.
Also, slackness in the Education system. Anyone else on here remember ITA Phonics in the 70s ?
I'm bored of it all !!! NO I AM NOT . . I'm bored WITH it all . . being a prime example.
Chris P Bacon
says...
6:02pm Tue 12 Jun 12
Twicki1 wrote:It always amazes me to see and hear people who believe the ability to speak more than one language bestows intelligence on the speaker. This has been shown to be wrong very near to where we live, actually. In North Wales, the desirability of children speaking both English and Welsh has reduced dramatically thanks to one obvious fact that too many people overlooked; vocabulary! A child of any given age will have a vocabulary of a certain number of words. This isn't dramatically changeable so when the child's vocabulary of, say, 1,000 words is slashed by 50% (half in English, half in Welsh) their ability to communicate effectively in either language is compromised leading to a reduction in exam passes. Once it was discovered that monolingual speakers did better in the predominant language than bi-lingual speakers, the demand dried up. No surprise there, then.
About time this was done, its been know for a long time that the younger they learn a language the better they arer at it. And my little boy is 6 and I have to say the improvement in his grammar, writing and spelling at his age is far more advanced than what was previously required. So in answer to the previous message they are doing.
So what do you call a speaker of three languages? Multi-lingual.
What do you call a speaker of two languages? Bi-Lingual
What do you call a speaker of one language? English.
Noiticer
says...
8:41pm Tue 12 Jun 12
jack daniels
says...
8:54pm Tue 12 Jun 12
Iftikhar wrote:WARNING crazy troll alert.
Foreign languages to be compulsory from age seven. Why wait until 7 to teach kids English? A system in which all primary children learn a foreign language from age seven will give pupils a much stronger foundation, which they can build on in secondary school to become fluent. I am surprised Arabic and Urdu aren't on that list. I think it is excellent that pupils are to be taught English as a second language.
Children that can speak more than one languages do better overall in learning and it will help them excel in a job when they are older. Only an idiot would think that being bi/trilingual is a bad thing. I think its great to be surrounded by foreign languages. There are plenty of benefits to learning them, it increases memory and other brain functions, looks great on a job résumé, and most importantly allows you to connect with a different culture and make new friends. Now is the time to teach them all the different languages you want to because they will just soak up the information. As we get older it becomes harder and harder to retrain our brains to learn a new language.
The earlier kids start learning a Foreign language the better and certainly before they are old enough for prejudices to have set in. Five years old would be better really. The younger kids are the faster they pick up languages. It's uncanny how the very young take to picking up languages. I speak from personal experience with my own young.This is a good start and sure there could be plenty of young foreigners here who could put their foreign languages to use rather than rocking up at the "dole" office - provided they have no predatory tendencies. ehem! It's easier to learn a language when you are younger. Also learning a foreign language helps you understand your own. Although I would want them to be taught this from the first day in school, not putting it off for a few years.
Becoming fluent in secondary school. Dream on! This just goes to show how very little government and its advisors know about the acquisition of a foreign language. I expect the usual carcrash of a curriculum. Majority of children cannot even speak the Standard English to start with. laudable aim Mr G but where will you get the staff from? The workforce survey showed that secondary schools are short of over two thousand language teachers. Foreign languages should only be taught by native speakers.
IA
http://www.londonsch
oolofislamics.org.uk
Bonging Lizard DNA
says...
8:58pm Tue 12 Jun 12
chris283
says...
11:52am Wed 13 Jun 12
Izanears says...
4:04pm Tue 12 Jun 12