Darwen's road delays blamed on gas repairs (From Lancashire Telegraph)
When news happens, text LT and your photos and videos to 80360. Or contact us by email or phone.
Darwen's road delays blamed on gas repairs
7:10pm Thursday 2nd August 2012 in Darwen
DARWEN councillors are laying the blame for recent traffic chaos on contractors carrying out gas main repairs.
Journeys that usually take 15 minutes are now taking an hour, because of roadworks on the A666 at Lynwood, and council bridge widening work on the alternative; Lower Eccleshill Road.
The council has come under fire for allowing two major works to be carried out at the same time.
Brian Taylor, Labour councillor for Darwen’s Sunnyhurst ward, said: “The (bridge) work had been planned for the best part of a year; what would we do with all the men and materials that were scheduled in to be there, as and when we required them?
“We do not have much, if any control, of the utilities, and for them to just turn up and begin working is where the real problem lies.
“We as a council have had to press for weekend working and more commitment to complete as soon as possible from them, in all honesty we shouldn't have to do that.”
Councillor Dave Smith is urging National Grid to put more men on the A666 job, and to work in the early evenings and at weekends. He also urged affected residents to ‘bombard’ National Grid with complaints.
Comments(14)
Excluded again
says...
8:48pm Thu 2 Aug 12
Strangely enough, just about all works done by utilities seem to be either emergencies or works needed to maintain customer supply. Can't think why that might be.
Wishingwell
says...
8:49pm Thu 2 Aug 12
Kes123
says...
9:13pm Thu 2 Aug 12
(1)In this Part “emergency works” means works whose execution at the time when they are executed is required in order to put an end to, or to prevent the occurrence of, circumstances then existing or imminent (or which the person responsible for the works believes on reasonable grounds to be existing or imminent) which are likely to cause danger to persons or property.
(2)Where works comprise items some of which fall within the preceding definition, the expression “emergency works” shall be taken to include such of the items as do not fall within that definition as cannot reasonably be severed from those that do.
(3)Where in any civil or criminal proceedings brought by virtue of any provision of this Part the question arises whether works were emergency works, it is for the person alleging that they were to prove it.
This is not emergency work it is planned mains replacement. Maintaining supply is not covered in the new roads and street act that is for the utilities to manage or get fined by the regulatory body.
A utility cannot just turn up and dig a hole, they must even for emergency work obtain permission for the local authority.
The council are not as innocent as they make out.
They can implement fines for works Not done to the letter of the law and believe me they fine utilities a small fortune
A Darener
says...
7:48am Fri 3 Aug 12
darwen_celeb
says...
9:51am Fri 3 Aug 12
QuizOnMyFace
says...
10:07am Fri 3 Aug 12
Wishingwell wrote:1. How would the residents on Blackburn Road react to the work being done at night, depriving them of sleep?
It just shows the total contempt with which the utility companies have for the public. These roadworks are a joke. There is easily enough space for two lanes of traffic past them tonight but the workforce clocked off and was long gone before the rush hour and couldn't care less. Why cant National Grid work shifts and get the job done fast like the Enviroment Agency lads. They were working late.
2. The work is contracted out to Balfour Beatty who then sub-contract it out. The lads on site are paid by how much pipe they replace, therefore the work is being done as fast as it can SAFELY be done.
QuizOnMyFace
says...
10:13am Fri 3 Aug 12
darwen_celeb wrote:Typical British mentality...It's not queue jumping it's using your brain.
This problem is exacerbated by unhelpful 'courteous drivers' allowing motorist to queue jump merging from Sunnyhurst Lane, having previously sneaked through back roads to bipass town. These drivers get through the lights whilst the queue gets bigger behind them. Further congestion is caused by motorists turning right into Sunnyhurst lane. This needs to be taken into consideration and somehow sorted, the traffic would then move a lot better.
The queue would have the same number of cars in if they joined the back, just local knowledge keeps them one step ahead...nothing wrong with that.
Bluegoose
says...
11:02am Fri 3 Aug 12
pbrock
says...
1:33pm Fri 3 Aug 12
QuizOnMyFace wrote:As can be seen from all the posts, the typical British mentality is "whine, whine, complain, complain.... and whine some more"
darwen_celeb wrote:Typical British mentality...It's not queue jumping it's using your brain.
This problem is exacerbated by unhelpful 'courteous drivers' allowing motorist to queue jump merging from Sunnyhurst Lane, having previously sneaked through back roads to bipass town. These drivers get through the lights whilst the queue gets bigger behind them. Further congestion is caused by motorists turning right into Sunnyhurst lane. This needs to be taken into consideration and somehow sorted, the traffic would then move a lot better.
The queue would have the same number of cars in if they joined the back, just local knowledge keeps them one step ahead...nothing wrong with that.
Crap happens, everyday is not going to be a great day; obstacles will almost always be present.
So adapt, keep moving forward, do not look behind - and will everyone PLEASE STOP WHINING.
--Earth first, we can destroy the other planets later--
darwen_celeb
says...
2:07pm Fri 3 Aug 12
pbrock wrote:Whinge? Merely an observation and a possible solution to relieve the congestion, weirdo.
QuizOnMyFace wrote:As can be seen from all the posts, the typical British mentality is "whine, whine, complain, complain.... and whine some more"
darwen_celeb wrote:Typical British mentality...It's not queue jumping it's using your brain.
This problem is exacerbated by unhelpful 'courteous drivers' allowing motorist to queue jump merging from Sunnyhurst Lane, having previously sneaked through back roads to bipass town. These drivers get through the lights whilst the queue gets bigger behind them. Further congestion is caused by motorists turning right into Sunnyhurst lane. This needs to be taken into consideration and somehow sorted, the traffic would then move a lot better.
The queue would have the same number of cars in if they joined the back, just local knowledge keeps them one step ahead...nothing wrong with that.
Crap happens, everyday is not going to be a great day; obstacles will almost always be present.
So adapt, keep moving forward, do not look behind - and will everyone PLEASE STOP WHINING.
--Earth first, we can destroy the other planets later--
Darwen Malc
says...
12:59am Sat 4 Aug 12
CapitaBackHander
says...
8:09pm Sun 5 Aug 12
totcoms
says...
9:44pm Mon 6 Aug 12
Kes123 says...
8:24pm Thu 2 Aug 12
It doesn't. take much to google it to find that out.
Taken straight for the new roads and street act
If it appears to the street authority—
A that proposed street works are likely to cause serious disruption to traffic, and
B that the disruption would be avoided or reduced if the works were carried out only at certain times,
the authority may give the undertaker such directions as may be appropriate as to the times when the works may or may not be carried out.
Yet more lies from this council!!!!!!!!!