When news happens, text LT and your photos and videos to 80360. Or contact us by email or phone.
11:59am Wednesday 1st February 2012 in Darwen
By Dan Clough, Reporter
A LEADING councillor has questioned why a car wash on the main road through Darwen has been allowed to operate without permission for five years.
After enquiring about water drainage at All Clean, on the junction of Bolton Road and Mill Gap Street, Whitehall Coun David Foster said he made the discovery last week.
He said: “It’s been open for a number of years now, and I’m really surprised that the powers that be at the council haven’t realised this.”
He said an application for the site was originally submitted in 2007 but was subsequently withdrawn, before a decision was made.
But the site had been used as a car wash ever since, apparently without the knowledge of Blackburn with Darwen Council planning enforcement team.
Council officers have now spoken to the landlord and his tenant, and have requested that a planning application be submitted for consideration.
Coun Foster added: “I have no objections to the site being used as a car wash, but it must be done responsibly. With the recent cold weather, I’m worried about drainage on the site and water running on to the pavement and road turning into ice.
“I’ve been told that someone has fallen over, and that’s a serious health and safety problem. If that was an elderly person, it could have dramatic consequences.”
A spokesman for All Clean said: “I’ve had a complaint about the water and I’ve now sorted out the drainage on the site so it’s not going on the road.
“As for the planning permission, the landlord tells me that it’s just a case of re-submitting a renewal form.”
A council spokesperson said: “We have asked for the submission of a planning application. If received, we would then consider if the site can continue to be used as a car wash.
“If that is agreeable in principle we would include conditions that suitable drainage be installed on site.
"If no application is received, appropriate enforcement action would be taken.”
Comments(30)
same-old-story
says...
12:25pm Wed 1 Feb 12
jackmetickler
says...
12:26pm Wed 1 Feb 12
darwenTower
says...
12:51pm Wed 1 Feb 12
jackmetickler wrote:The council charge for planning applications. It could make a profit.
not much point in having a planning dept really if we can all just by-pass them..
Now theres a big saving the council could make..
Dai Darwen
says...
1:40pm Wed 1 Feb 12
happycyclist wrote:If this is the case why has it taken until the 3rd winter to take action.
Quite right. This is a sensible approach by Cllr Foster and he's right to be concerned about the pavements when it is cold, because the run-off from that place the previous two winters went beyond the pavements into the road and was treacherous.
english rose 1
says...
2:36pm Wed 1 Feb 12
Dai Darwen wrote:Planning permission has nothing to do with paying taxes. Unless someone complains about properties not having planning permission in place then it is difficult for the Council to find out as there are only 2 enforcement officers for the whole Borough. There are probably hundreds of (mainly small) developments in all Boroughs that don't have pp. Advertising hoardings abound without pp, - it's up to folk to complain if they think something isn't right.
happycyclist wrote:If this is the case why has it taken until the 3rd winter to take action.
Quite right. This is a sensible approach by Cllr Foster and he's right to be concerned about the pavements when it is cold, because the run-off from that place the previous two winters went beyond the pavements into the road and was treacherous.
If no planning permission does that mean they are not paying the correct tax ??
Have they had government financial help setting up the business ?? If so perhaps they should pay back what should have been paid retrospectively.
Someone somewhere has messed up big style here, right on the main road as well for all to see.
It gets even better.
HappyChappie
says...
3:05pm Wed 1 Feb 12
Dai Darwen
says...
3:27pm Wed 1 Feb 12
english rose 1 wrote:My point is, if the Council do not know what the building or land is being used for then how do they know what to tax the owner for ?
Dai Darwen wrote:Planning permission has nothing to do with paying taxes. Unless someone complains about properties not having planning permission in place then it is difficult for the Council to find out as there are only 2 enforcement officers for the whole Borough. There are probably hundreds of (mainly small) developments in all Boroughs that don't have pp. Advertising hoardings abound without pp, - it's up to folk to complain if they think something isn't right. * Previously this site was used as a builders merchants - fork lift vehicles used to run onto the pavement & road. * The car wash is a better use than the previous builders merchant.happycyclist wrote: Quite right. This is a sensible approach by Cllr Foster and he's right to be concerned about the pavements when it is cold, because the run-off from that place the previous two winters went beyond the pavements into the road and was treacherous.If this is the case why has it taken until the 3rd winter to take action. If no planning permission does that mean they are not paying the correct tax ?? Have they had government financial help setting up the business ?? If so perhaps they should pay back what should have been paid retrospectively. Someone somewhere has messed up big style here, right on the main road as well for all to see. It gets even better.
Aslam Hussain
says...
4:07pm Wed 1 Feb 12
Dai Darwen wrote:Totally agree with You. We cannot condone businesses to operate in this manner.
english rose 1 wrote:My point is, if the Council do not know what the building or land is being used for then how do they know what to tax the owner for ? I also remember the establishment as a garage, whether a car wash is better or not is a matter of opinion. Providing employment and doing a good job is excellent and even better if done above board. I find it a little concerning that establishments without pp needs to have a complaint or query from the public before being investigated. How can anyone find out if no pp has been granted, there will be no record. Why would anyone not apply for pp when they should if not for personal gain ???Dai Darwen wrote:Planning permission has nothing to do with paying taxes. Unless someone complains about properties not having planning permission in place then it is difficult for the Council to find out as there are only 2 enforcement officers for the whole Borough. There are probably hundreds of (mainly small) developments in all Boroughs that don't have pp. Advertising hoardings abound without pp, - it's up to folk to complain if they think something isn't right. * Previously this site was used as a builders merchants - fork lift vehicles used to run onto the pavement & road. * The car wash is a better use than the previous builders merchant.happycyclist wrote: Quite right. This is a sensible approach by Cllr Foster and he's right to be concerned about the pavements when it is cold, because the run-off from that place the previous two winters went beyond the pavements into the road and was treacherous.If this is the case why has it taken until the 3rd winter to take action. If no planning permission does that mean they are not paying the correct tax ?? Have they had government financial help setting up the business ?? If so perhaps they should pay back what should have been paid retrospectively. Someone somewhere has messed up big style here, right on the main road as well for all to see. It gets even better.
darwen_celeb
says...
4:12pm Wed 1 Feb 12
HappyChappie wrote:Agreed.
Lets hope they get planning permission because the lads do a great job cleaning the cars and most importantly, they are working.
timeforcommonsense
says...
4:23pm Wed 1 Feb 12
english rose 1
says...
4:26pm Wed 1 Feb 12
Dai Darwen wrote:Business taxes are set by the Govt not the Council. The business tax register is totally seperate from planning permissions.
english rose 1 wrote:My point is, if the Council do not know what the building or land is being used for then how do they know what to tax the owner for ?
Dai Darwen wrote:Planning permission has nothing to do with paying taxes. Unless someone complains about properties not having planning permission in place then it is difficult for the Council to find out as there are only 2 enforcement officers for the whole Borough. There are probably hundreds of (mainly small) developments in all Boroughs that don't have pp. Advertising hoardings abound without pp, - it's up to folk to complain if they think something isn't right. * Previously this site was used as a builders merchants - fork lift vehicles used to run onto the pavement & road. * The car wash is a better use than the previous builders merchant.happycyclist wrote: Quite right. This is a sensible approach by Cllr Foster and he's right to be concerned about the pavements when it is cold, because the run-off from that place the previous two winters went beyond the pavements into the road and was treacherous.If this is the case why has it taken until the 3rd winter to take action. If no planning permission does that mean they are not paying the correct tax ?? Have they had government financial help setting up the business ?? If so perhaps they should pay back what should have been paid retrospectively. Someone somewhere has messed up big style here, right on the main road as well for all to see. It gets even better.
I also remember the establishment as a garage, whether a car wash is better or not is a matter of opinion.
Providing employment and doing a good job is excellent and even better if done above board.
I find it a little concerning that establishments without pp needs to have a complaint or query from the public before being investigated. How can anyone find out if no pp has been granted, there will be no record.
Why would anyone not apply for pp when they should if not for personal gain ???
darwenTower
says...
4:31pm Wed 1 Feb 12
timeforcommonsense wrote:People can voice opinion whenever they like.
They will get retrospective permission, they always do. Doesn't exactly give people the chance to voice opposition to such plans does it?
sean_brfc
says...
4:33pm Wed 1 Feb 12
HappyChappie wrote:Exactly, I only hear good comments about that place.
Lets hope they get planning permission because the lads do a great job cleaning the cars and most importantly, they are working.
sean_brfc
says...
4:33pm Wed 1 Feb 12
HappyChappie wrote:Exactly, I only hear good comments about that place.
Lets hope they get planning permission because the lads do a great job cleaning the cars and most importantly, they are working.
Izanears
says...
4:59pm Wed 1 Feb 12
Dai Darwen
says...
5:32pm Wed 1 Feb 12
english rose 1 wrote:Perhaps now you are aware and know exactly which department to report a possible misdemeanour to you could be an upstanding citizen and report the matter. Not that I am implying you are anything but. It just seems I know very little about these matters.
Dai Darwen wrote:Business taxes are set by the Govt not the Council. The business tax register is totally seperate from planning permissions. * It's up to the taxman to find out about new businesses & it's the responsibility of the businesses to register for tax. Nowt to do with planning permission. * If you know of someone working and not paying tax just report them to the taxman, - exactly same for planning permission, - if you know of someone not having the right pp just tell the Council. * Unfortunately the Council does not have the resources to scour the Borough, - and for the relatively small fees involved it wouldn't make economic sense. The Council relies on businesses and the public doing the right thing, - but if there is a breach and it's brought to the attention of the Planning Dept they'll try hard to put it right.english rose 1 wrote:My point is, if the Council do not know what the building or land is being used for then how do they know what to tax the owner for ? I also remember the establishment as a garage, whether a car wash is better or not is a matter of opinion. Providing employment and doing a good job is excellent and even better if done above board. I find it a little concerning that establishments without pp needs to have a complaint or query from the public before being investigated. How can anyone find out if no pp has been granted, there will be no record. Why would anyone not apply for pp when they should if not for personal gain ???Dai Darwen wrote:Planning permission has nothing to do with paying taxes. Unless someone complains about properties not having planning permission in place then it is difficult for the Council to find out as there are only 2 enforcement officers for the whole Borough. There are probably hundreds of (mainly small) developments in all Boroughs that don't have pp. Advertising hoardings abound without pp, - it's up to folk to complain if they think something isn't right. * Previously this site was used as a builders merchants - fork lift vehicles used to run onto the pavement & road. * The car wash is a better use than the previous builders merchant.happycyclist wrote: Quite right. This is a sensible approach by Cllr Foster and he's right to be concerned about the pavements when it is cold, because the run-off from that place the previous two winters went beyond the pavements into the road and was treacherous.If this is the case why has it taken until the 3rd winter to take action. If no planning permission does that mean they are not paying the correct tax ?? Have they had government financial help setting up the business ?? If so perhaps they should pay back what should have been paid retrospectively. Someone somewhere has messed up big style here, right on the main road as well for all to see. It gets even better.
s_smith
says...
5:55pm Wed 1 Feb 12
Dai Darwen
says...
7:21pm Wed 1 Feb 12
s_smith wrote:Thanks layman terms .
Oh come on Dai, it is very simple. The council KNOWS when you haven't paid your council tax, because you have paid before and if you are late they know where to contact you. . In the case of Planning Permissions, someone could erect a building without permission and the council cannot possibly know about it unless someone else complains about it. . The Council collect business rates only on behalf of central government, they have little to do with any other part of it.
Dai Darwen
says...
7:21pm Wed 1 Feb 12
s_smith wrote:Thanks layman terms .
Oh come on Dai, it is very simple. The council KNOWS when you haven't paid your council tax, because you have paid before and if you are late they know where to contact you. . In the case of Planning Permissions, someone could erect a building without permission and the council cannot possibly know about it unless someone else complains about it. . The Council collect business rates only on behalf of central government, they have little to do with any other part of it.
happycyclist
says...
8:45pm Wed 1 Feb 12
darwen_celeb wrote:Who said anything about cycling in sub-zero temperatures? I was on about the pavements.
HappyChappie wrote:Agreed.
Lets hope they get planning permission because the lads do a great job cleaning the cars and most importantly, they are working.
The past winters when the roads were ALL treacherous was probably accelerated more by the fact that the numpties at the Council didn't order enough grit or the fact that they dont adequately maintain the roads and pavements to promote sufficient drainage...
...wonder if they have ordered any grit for this week? Probably not.
Anyway, you'd have to be a numpty to cycle in subzero temperatures especially when it is dark, black ice will get you before the forecourt of this carwash, you'd probably be super aware that there's gonna be ice around, so much that you'd dismount or take a wide enough birth to avoid it, making it the safest part of the A666 to cycle in winter.
QuizOnMyFace
says...
8:52am Thu 2 Feb 12
same-old-story
says...
1:50pm Thu 2 Feb 12
Incredible Hulk
says...
5:39pm Thu 2 Feb 12
same-old-story
says...
6:27pm Thu 2 Feb 12
Incredible Hulk wrote:The truth will out .. they've all got to come clean in the end .....
They're not even any good at washing cars. I asked for - and got - my £3.50 back. It was dirtier when I came out than when I went in. Never again.
Darwen83
says...
11:49am Sat 4 Feb 12
Incredible Hulk wrote:As if it did...
They're not even any good at washing cars. I asked for - and got - my £3.50 back. It was dirtier when I came out than when I went in. Never again.
lucymorgan
says...
1:09pm Mon 6 Feb 12
darwen_celeb
says...
9:03pm Tue 7 Feb 12
Incredible Hulk wrote:Don't want to know what you were doing inside your car to make it so dirty whilst they were hosing the pine sap and needles off the body work...
They're not even any good at washing cars. I asked for - and got - my £3.50 back. It was dirtier when I came out than when I went in. Never again.
darwen_celeb
says...
9:03pm Tue 7 Feb 12
Incredible Hulk wrote:Don't want to know what you were doing inside your car to make it so dirty whilst they were hosing the pine sap and needles off the body work...
They're not even any good at washing cars. I asked for - and got - my £3.50 back. It was dirtier when I came out than when I went in. Never again.
darwen_celeb
says...
9:09pm Tue 7 Feb 12
Search jobs in and around Lancashire
Search Now »
Find the right person for you
Search Now »
Search houses, flats, and all properties
Search Now »
Search new & used cars in and around Lancashire
Search Now »
happycyclist says...
12:22pm Wed 1 Feb 12