Abbey Village RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


LT block logo JOIN THE DEBATE BY ADDING YOUR COMMENTS ON THESE STORIES

Registering to post comments on the Lancashire Telegraph website only takes a few seconds. Click here to go to the registration page.

Lancashire bosses say survey proves speed cameras work


ROAD safety bosses have completed a survey which they said proved speed cameras were the most effective way of ensuring drivers stick to the limit.

The Lancashire Partnership for Road Safety tested three 30mph roads with a fixed camera, without and with an interactive sign that shows passing motorists’ speed.

Samples of speed taken during the lunchtime period showed that the number of drivers travelling at 35mph or above rose from 0.8 per cent with a camera present to 7.4 per cent when the camera was removed.

This then reduced to 5.6 per cent when the driver feedback sign was in use.

The three test sites were the A680 Whalley Road, Great Harwood, the B6243 Preston Road, Grimsargh, and in Preston, the B5411 Tag Lane, Preston.

At a fourth experiment was conducted on the A675 Bolton Road at the entrance to Abbey Village where there had never been a speed camera.

An interactive sign was installed and the results showed the percentage of drivers travelling at 35 mph fell from 33 per cent to 11 per cent after it was installed.

Steve Whitehouse, the project manager for the partnership said: “Saving lives on our roads is what we are about and if an interactive sign was as good as, or better, at keeping drivers below the speed limit then that is what we would use across the county.

“However, this trial has shown us that this particular sign is not as effective as a fixed camera with its associated penalties for those that break the law.

“Speeding puts all road users at risk of injury and death.

“There was just one recorded speed related injury collision during the trial period which is the good news, but local residents at all three former fixed camera sites have asked for their camera to be re-installed amongst fears of increased speeds leading to ‘an accident waiting to happen.

“The residents of Abbey Village have also asked for their Driver Feedback Sign to remain in situ.”

Comments(5)

Insight says...
7:38pm Tue 2 Sep 08

What an interesting test, nothing, illuminated sign or speed camera and from this the 'bosses' conclude that speed cameras are the best solution?

I'd like to say I'm convinced, but oddly enough I'm not going to.

Isn't this test a bit like asking which tastes nicer, cardboard, polystyrene or sawdust?

I'd suggest that using a real patrol car with real police officers in it would win top prize, but surprisingly that option wasn't included.

Oh well, I suppose the drunks and druggies will approve of these findings and be happy to continue to exploit the limitations of speed cameras.

Durham and North Yorkshire don't use fixed cameras and police the roads properly and they have some of the highest success rates in casualty reduction in the country.

If saving lives is what you're all about, why were their methods omitted from this 'so called' test?.

Which is better, an out of control quango?, a polaroid on a pole ... or our once world reknowned traffic police who aren't receiving government funding and are therefore absent from the roads (except for week long crackdowns with splendidly action hero names like 'operation anvil' or some such nonsense and the annual chrimbo drink drive campaign) all the time the partnerships are in the way spinning findings to preserve their self important little jobs?

Insight says...
7:47pm Tue 2 Sep 08

Now we'll hear that real police are too expensive, which of course is complete tosh, because for the same price as just one fixed camera, you could equip three existing police units with ANPR and cover the entire area.

This would indicate a return to policing all the other offences that speed cameras simply aren't dealing with.

The maths are very simple, if real police cars were deployed and even more lives were saved than speed cameras with each life representing a cost of £1.3 million to the tax payer, these 'real' police would pay for themselves 'and' make the roads safer all round.

Sorry chaps, it's simple logic.

Insight says...
8:05pm Tue 2 Sep 08

You see, people who campaign against speed camera are not advocating lawlessness, we're advocating getting tougher than the partnerhips can ever hope to achieve and seeing as the law has been changed to allow the use of unmarked vans containing staff who need wages, all we're saying is, if you're having to pay someone to sit in a van to make up for the inadequacy of easily avoided speed cameras, pay a real traffic police officer to do it instead.

The only element missing from current strategy is actually apprehending a dangerous driver, a job which only real police officers can do and then we're right back to where we started.

Stop the waste and stop the propaganda because all this so called survey really proves is.

Speed cameras are better than nothing ..but only just!

Insight says...
8:20pm Tue 2 Sep 08

One last thing...

When you guys have these week long crack downs, please have the wisdom to read the reports about the frightening large number of convictions that occur when real police return to the area, everything from no insurance and mot to stolen vehicles, drunks, fake documents, speeding in areas where there aren't normally cameras the list goes on and on.

Because it appears that to you, it's a glorious propaganda success, to the general public, it means this kind of behaviour is going on completely undetected and unchallenged the other fifty one weeks of the year.

Aitch says...
8:32pm Tue 2 Sep 08

Steve Whitehouse can say what he likes but he should realise no one believes him. All that these ridiculous revenue raising cameras do is lower the general public's respect for the police. The police used to be held in high regard, now all the law abiding people that have been robbed, Dick Turpin style, on the highways by these people are turning against them. Be aware Mr Policeman, the public are not your friends anymore.


Most popular


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Local Businesses