News RSS Feed


Backing in East Lancashire for tougher penalties for speeding drivers

Tougher penalties on speeding drivers are set to be announced Tougher penalties on speeding drivers are set to be announced

THE families of young motorists killed in speeding cars have backed plans to give tougher penalties to those who break the limit.

Ministers today announced they are considering giving a six-point penalty to drivers who break the speed limit by more than 20mph.

This would mean that a motorist could lose their licence for just two speeding offences.

The consultation also suggests creating formal drug-drive limits in a bid to make prosecutions easier to achieve.

Ministers said the move was aimed at cutting the injury toll with 2,946 deaths and 30,000 serious injuries on British roads last year.

In April 2007, Ashley Connell, 23, of Knowsley Road, Wilpshire, was the front seat passenger in a car driven by his friend Ashley Fielding, 21, of Whalley Banks, Whalley, which crashed in Mellor Lane, Mellor.

Fielding was travelling up to 86mph in the 60mph zone and Ashley Connell died from his injured.

Ashley’s father Mike Connell said: “I agree with the proposal, but it won’t bring Ashley back.

"I wouldn’t wish it on anybody what my family and I have gone through.

"Ashley won’t be the first and he won’t be the last.

“There are just too many wasted lives and people don’t follow the limits.

“A car sped past me at 90mph on Ribchester Road last week, and the driver could have caused a fatal accident, but he wasn’t bothered.

"But I suppose anything that will slow down drivers is a good thing especially if it will save lives.”

On January 9, 2006, Matthew Hannon, 22, of St. Philip’s Road, Blackburn, died after crashing while racing a friend at 60mph on the 30mph Livesey Branch Road.

His father Terry said he was backing the proposals ‘one hundred per cent’.

Related links

He said: “I occasionally take a walk on Livesey Branch Road, where Matthew died.

"I see cars speeding past. It’s like a rat run for young boy racers.

"The proposals are definitely a step in the right direction as far as I’m concerned.”

Steve Whitehouse, project manager for Lancashire Partnership for Road Safety which runs the county’s speed cameras, welcomed the plans.

He said: “According to research carried out, 35 per cent of drivers admit to knowingly breaking the speed limit.

"Of those with points, about a third say they will continue to speed.

"This suggests that the penalty is not harsh enough to deter them and increasing the penalty would appear to make sense.”

Comments(5)

Geoff909 says...
3:58pm Thu 20 Nov 08

I completely agree with the proposals, but will there be any police out there to catch the offenders in the first place? The general attitude is that there is little or no chance of a policeman catching you in the act. We all know that speed cameras slow traffic for a hundred yards or so, but this has come at the cost of the bobby on the beat. Ask yourself when was the last time you saw a policeman stop someone and compare that to how many times you wish someone had been stopped!

Jimpster says...
4:23pm Thu 20 Nov 08

More knee-jerk reaction yes speed limits should be enforced, but how many of these accidents were due to the dead and injured being under the influence of drink or drugs, driving improperly maintained cars or just generally showing off and arseing about with their mates on board. You can legislate all you want and try to wrap society in cotton wool but you cannot make allowances for the mindless idiots who will push the limits and their own safety for whatever reason

shellywelly says...
4:38pm Thu 20 Nov 08

Just a thought.....Train the public to use the hand held devices. We could then be pro active and volunteer an hour or so a week. The police wont be as stretched as they are now and we can catch the speeders in our local area. I would get so much satisfaction in catching the idiots in my area that think they are above the law.

easymonies says...
7:13pm Thu 20 Nov 08

The hand-held devises have been proven to be unreliable because if there is any movement in the device whilst it is reading it will give a false result. That's why you do not see them as often now.

Blondie says...
10:58am Fri 21 Nov 08

Jimpster wrote:
More knee-jerk reaction yes speed limits should be enforced, but how many of these accidents were due to the dead and injured being under the influence of drink or drugs, driving improperly maintained cars or just generally showing off and arseing about with their mates on board. You can legislate all you want and try to wrap society in cotton wool but you cannot make allowances for the mindless idiots who will push the limits and their own safety for whatever reason
Totally agree with the above post.


click2find

Most popular


About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree