When news happens, text LT and your photos and videos to 80360. Or contact us by email or phone.
9:00am Tuesday 14th July 2009
A GROUNDBREAKING project set up to tackle sexual exploitation of children in Blackburn with Darwen has led to a dramatic increase in the number of people being prosecuted.
Since the Engage team was set up in March 2008, the number of offences investigated has risen from an average of two cases a year to 100.
The team, which is a partnership of police, social services, health groups and children’s charities, specialises in tracking down offenders who groom teenagers for sex, and offers support and protection to the victims and their families.
It was set up after the Lancashire Telegraph’s Keep Them Safe campaign highlighted the problem of girls being groomed for sex by older, often - but not exclusively - Asian men.
The aim of the campaign was to raise awareness of how predatory men were plying young girls with alcohol and drugs and bribing them with gifts in return for sex.
Yesterday the increase in prosecutions since the project was launched was praised as ‘terrific news’ by Blackburn MP and Justice Secretary Jack Straw, while police hailed the team for their ‘exceptional work’.
It comes as the Engage team has been recognised nationally and internationally for its work.
The team was named as one of three of the top entries in the Tilley Awards, a national scheme set up to recognise innovative crime fighting projects and representatives will appear at a major conference in October to share their experience with charities, local authorities and police forces across Britain.
The team has also been selected to tell of their success at an international conference in America.
DCI Martin Kay, of Lancashire police, said: “The work of the team has had a huge impact on the lives and well being of children and their families across Blackburn with Darwen and East Lancashire.
“This kind of exceptional work shows what can be achieved when working in partnership with other agencies and charities and the fact that more and more people are having the confidence in the police and other agencies to come forward is testament to the dedication and commitment of the team.“ Jack Straw, Blackburn MP and Justice Secretary, said: "This is terrific news.
"It will provide parents and vulnerable people with great reassurance.
"My congratulations go to the police and everyone else involved."
The team was set up in March 2008 and since over 180 potentially vulnerable children have been referred to Engage.
Before it was set up only two people were charged with six offences between them in the three years from 2005 to 2007.
In the year since its launch 37 people have been charged with more than 100 offences of sexual explotation.
Freya, 14, who is unable to give her full name, is one of the young girls the Engage team has been working with.
Speaking of her experience, she said: “I was frightened, but felt trapped in the situation.
"The men made me feel like I was ‘damaged goods’ and no-one else would want me.
“But now I’m getting help from the Engage team and I’m starting to realise that none of this is my fault and my life doesn’t have to be this way.”
Organisations such as Brook, Lifeline, Blackburn with Darwen Primary Care Trust and Barnardo’s also make up a large part of the team.
Laurence Loft, chairman of the Local Safeguarding Children Board, said: “Sexual exploitation is a worldwide problem and I hope that what has been achieved here in Blackburn with Darwen will inspire others to set up similar projects to address the issue.” The Engage team will soon be moving into a new base when the Boulevard Pub, next to Blackburn railway station, undergoes a £1.1million revamp.
Other organisations to be based at the new centre include the police, NHS, sexual health experts the Brook Advisory Service, and Barnardos.
Sgt Mark Whelan, from the Engage team, said: “We have done a lot of good work to raise awareness of sexual exploitation and as a result we are receiving almost four referrals each week.
“By pooling the skills from a number of different organisations we are seeing a growing number of prosecutions at court and are successfully helping to protect children from being sexually exploited.”
Akki, Accy says...
11:05am Tue 14 Jul 09
truth1234, darwen says...
11:43am Tue 14 Jul 09
sambam, nelson says...
12:06pm Tue 14 Jul 09
truth1234 wrote:LET I feel that it is appaling that you have removed many of the post. Yes i agree that if something is vividly offensive/racist/una
pathetic telegraph removing posts yet again. free speech unless u speak up for white people.
Mike Costa, Blackburn says...
12:37pm Tue 14 Jul 09
bgrs, says...
12:54pm Tue 14 Jul 09
timeforcommonsense, Clayton_le_moors says...
12:55pm Tue 14 Jul 09
sambam wrote:I could not agree more. It is the people who feel they have to 'protect' minority groups who create massive frustration which in turn is labled as racism, which in turn creates more frustration. Shame on the narrow minded, short sighted editorial staff of the L.E.T
truth1234 wrote: pathetic telegraph removing posts yet again. free speech unless u speak up for white people.LET I feel that it is appaling that you have removed many of the post. Yes i agree that if something is vividly offensive/racist/una cceptable then then you have a duty to remove such comments. However what is the point of having such forums if people cannot share thet views. I see that all my post have remained intact as i am talking in defense of the vast mulsim/asian poplulation. This in itself is unfair and is only going to intensify hate and bitterness amongst the people who's post you are trying to remove. These pages should be for healthy discussion but this can only be allowed if all opinions can be viewed.
RAyzer, BURNLEY says...
3:49pm Tue 14 Jul 09
sambam, nelson says...
5:04pm Tue 14 Jul 09
RAyzer wrote:Well said RAyzar...not often i agree with you but you've hit the nail on the head
dont just blame asians,what a bout the kids parents??they should be telling them not to get in these cars just for weed and a ride in a souped up astra/B.M.W,educate these kids...and theres plenty of white peados around to...stop **** footing around,hand down big sentances AND SORT THESE OLD SENIAL JUDGES OUT who think its the norm to be a peado..
Barb Dwyer, my town says...
5:50pm Tue 14 Jul 09
easymonies, Disneyland says...
6:01pm Tue 14 Jul 09
mazx4, blackburn says...
6:52pm Tue 14 Jul 09
Wikidi, Accrington says...
7:23pm Tue 14 Jul 09
retired one, Blackburn says...
8:36pm Tue 14 Jul 09
truth1234 wrote:I totally agree, my earlier post was removed. I wonder if it was because I mentioned Salim Mulla.
pathetic telegraph removing posts yet again. free speech unless u speak up for white people.
NelsonPatriot, Nelson says...
9:23pm Tue 14 Jul 09
Woody Riversider, Blackburn says...
10:29am Wed 15 Jul 09
NelsonPatriot wrote:I like this post/article....
Sambam, although you may mean well, I think you're a bit misguided with your, how shall I put it, "mental conditioning" of trying to frame the parameters of debate. You quickly came to the 'rescue' of the "whole" Asian community by trying to fend off criticisms of it, but it’s easy to try and paint a picture which isn't there, to try and silence harsh criticisms aimed at the Asian sector of society. Nobody blames the WHOLE Asian community for these acts, and its folly to suggest people do. What is the case however, is that the vast majority (in fact, I’d say almost entirely exclusively - despite what the paper has to print for the sake of preventing inter-community violence)are Asian Muslim males. If around 90%+ of these cases are Asian males, then it’s quite right to be very vociferous and condemning that general sector of society. The problem lies in their court. It doesn’t mean somebody is suggesting that every single Asian male is a grooming paedophile, but what it does mean is that the blame is being sent where its due. Pretending it could be anybody and it is being done by anybody is not doing anyone any favours. I keep a close eye on these matters, and I can assure you I have not seen any major case with the white population as perpetrators anywhere in the country. Almost exclusively they have been Asian Muslim males and Black males. Whether it’s Burnley and Pendle, Blackburn, Blackpool, Bradford, Leicester, Birmingham, or further afield the story is often the same. That some in the country are perhaps Turkish, and possibly classed as 'white' on some census forms is here nor there. This particular twist of the crime is not even confined to this country, it is also prevalent in other European countries with the same kinds of demographic mix. Of course, there are white paedophiles. Of course there’s the odd looking chap hanging around the park swings or some luring piano teacher taking liberties or whatever - but let’s be absolutely plain here - the mentality, the attitude, the scene and the scale of abuse along with the cocktail of drugs and deep damaging mental scars on these poor girls (that lasts months, years, often a lifetime) is an entirely different situation. Some letching saddo on a computer webcam, or some loner getting his jollies around park gates is a far cry from what lay beneath this particular grooming of girls by Asian Muslim youths and older men. In fact, to try and hide/minimise that it is almost exclusively (if not fully exclusively) Asian males doing this is putting young girls at risk for the sake of Political Correctness. Whether it’s polite to say so or not, they should be told (without any fear of "racism" labels) who are the most likely to groom them in this way. The only reason the caveat is emphasised in the newspaper story is to try and prevent rioting or attacks on the Asian community, and a cynical attempt to stop certain political parties from pointing it out. It is in the guidelines of the National Union of Journalists to do so, and the organisations like the Police and child welfare teams are usually 'that way out' when it comes to these matters. As for Rayzer.....wow, are you an apologist for these paedophiles?. Perhaps Im mistaken but that seems to be the thrust of your argument when you strip it down to basics. What are you suggesting, that because parents aren’t watching their daughters' every single move it's okay for the predators to act?. If I left a briefcase in my car with some sandwiches in, that does not mean that I deserve to have my car broken into by thieves. It is not *my* fault the crime was committed, it is the actions of the criminal who decided to break into my car and *they alone* who is responsible for the crime. I concede that we are in a very broken society where many parents can't even control their children and many don’t know where they are or what they are up to - but that in itself is no excuse for them being abused in this way. Teenage girls often rebel against their parents and in case you weren’t aware - this is part of the "scene" behind these groomers. They try and set the girl away from the parents until the point is reached where the parent’s warnings and such are not taken seriously and acted against in sheer bloody mindedness. They are made to distrust their family, reject the authority of the parents, or eventually made to feel so ashamed and in too deep with sex and drugs etc that they are held hostage by their own actions, and blackmailed "if you don’t do it, I will tell your mum what a 'slag' you are and what you've done" or even threats of serious violence. Etc etc. This is the idea of grooming, to take rebellious and unconfident young girls and set them against their parents' already flagging control. To make them feel "grown up" and involved in a sort of street culture of fast car rides, drugs, sex and alcohol that is alluring and exciting at that age. These victims see these people as their "friends" and often don’t want to prosecute, and because they’ve been conditioned by liberalist society in general to be so easy-going about sex and drug taking, and being 'colour blind' etc despite their parents' warnings - many don't see a problem with getting involved with any of it at the start. Unless you plan on locking young people in their bedrooms or installing tracking devices and CCTV around the neighbourhood to keep track of daughters, I don’t know what else somebody would do with a 13/14 year old girl who disappears random evenings until very late. Like somebody trying to make out that a rape victim “had it coming" because they dress a certain way or act a certain way, it is unacceptable to think this way and is on the way to being the mindset of an appeaser. It is the kind of attitude that if women don’t cover up or otherwise don’t conform to strict conservative social norms they are prey for rape like 'leaving a piece of chicken out for a cat' (to paraphrase an Australian Imam). It’s good to know that the team is cracking down on it, but it’s taken long enough - we've all known in these areas that it’s been going on for a decade or more. I think only a potent brew of pressure from the outside has seen this be taken up seriously. When it was brought up a good few years ago in Bradford, for the sake of "community cohesion" the problem was outright denied by the Chief Constable there and a television broadcast discussing the matter was postponed because it could have had explosive reactions at the ballot box in the then up-coming election. Some out there are still taking the line that this whole problem was a "racist myth" made up out of fresh air. But many normal people are far from in denial and have no qualms at pointing out just who is predominantly behind this. People can only obscure the truth for so long. It is a secret scourge on society, because nobody knows when and where, and what scale this problem is. I think there would be hell to pay if it was more open and visible in society. Tides are turning in that regard. It is good that these teams are there, because I know for a fact that if this had continued without such teams there are many people out there who are quite ready and willing to get together and try and get on top of this situation without the police being involved. Good luck to the team, we have to show this is not acceptable and we need to get proper court rulings that are fitting as a deterrent. But that’s where it usually falls down. Like many police schemes and such, they do a lot of expensive, emotional, time consuming work to see it come to a disheartening conviction at the end of it. Good luck to the team, its good to hear they are having some impact. Sadly though, this is a situation that isnt going to go away, and I bet its just the tip of the iceberg.
sambam, nelson says...
10:39am Wed 15 Jul 09
NelsonPatriot wrote:NelsonPatriot, You've put arguement forward really well and i understantd what you trying to say. Maybe I am defensive of Asians.
Sambam, although you may mean well, I think you're a bit misguided with your, how shall I put it, "mental conditioning" of trying to frame the parameters of debate. You quickly came to the 'rescue' of the "whole" Asian community by trying to fend off criticisms of it, but it’s easy to try and paint a picture which isn't there, to try and silence harsh criticisms aimed at the Asian sector of society. Nobody blames the WHOLE Asian community for these acts, and its folly to suggest people do. What is the case however, is that the vast majority (in fact, I’d say almost entirely exclusively - despite what the paper has to print for the sake of preventing inter-community violence)are Asian Muslim males. If around 90%+ of these cases are Asian males, then it’s quite right to be very vociferous and condemning that general sector of society. The problem lies in their court. It doesn’t mean somebody is suggesting that every single Asian male is a grooming paedophile, but what it does mean is that the blame is being sent where its due. Pretending it could be anybody and it is being done by anybody is not doing anyone any favours. I keep a close eye on these matters, and I can assure you I have not seen any major case with the white population as perpetrators anywhere in the country. Almost exclusively they have been Asian Muslim males and Black males. Whether it’s Burnley and Pendle, Blackburn, Blackpool, Bradford, Leicester, Birmingham, or further afield the story is often the same. That some in the country are perhaps Turkish, and possibly classed as 'white' on some census forms is here nor there. This particular twist of the crime is not even confined to this country, it is also prevalent in other European countries with the same kinds of demographic mix. Of course, there are white paedophiles. Of course there’s the odd looking chap hanging around the park swings or some luring piano teacher taking liberties or whatever - but let’s be absolutely plain here - the mentality, the attitude, the scene and the scale of abuse along with the cocktail of drugs and deep damaging mental scars on these poor girls (that lasts months, years, often a lifetime) is an entirely different situation. Some letching saddo on a computer webcam, or some loner getting his jollies around park gates is a far cry from what lay beneath this particular grooming of girls by Asian Muslim youths and older men. In fact, to try and hide/minimise that it is almost exclusively (if not fully exclusively) Asian males doing this is putting young girls at risk for the sake of Political Correctness. Whether it’s polite to say so or not, they should be told (without any fear of "racism" labels) who are the most likely to groom them in this way. The only reason the caveat is emphasised in the newspaper story is to try and prevent rioting or attacks on the Asian community, and a cynical attempt to stop certain political parties from pointing it out. It is in the guidelines of the National Union of Journalists to do so, and the organisations like the Police and child welfare teams are usually 'that way out' when it comes to these matters. As for Rayzer.....wow, are you an apologist for these paedophiles?. Perhaps Im mistaken but that seems to be the thrust of your argument when you strip it down to basics. What are you suggesting, that because parents aren’t watching their daughters' every single move it's okay for the predators to act?. If I left a briefcase in my car with some sandwiches in, that does not mean that I deserve to have my car broken into by thieves. It is not *my* fault the crime was committed, it is the actions of the criminal who decided to break into my car and *they alone* who is responsible for the crime. I concede that we are in a very broken society where many parents can't even control their children and many don’t know where they are or what they are up to - but that in itself is no excuse for them being abused in this way. Teenage girls often rebel against their parents and in case you weren’t aware - this is part of the "scene" behind these groomers. They try and set the girl away from the parents until the point is reached where the parent’s warnings and such are not taken seriously and acted against in sheer bloody mindedness. They are made to distrust their family, reject the authority of the parents, or eventually made to feel so ashamed and in too deep with sex and drugs etc that they are held hostage by their own actions, and blackmailed "if you don’t do it, I will tell your mum what a 'slag' you are and what you've done" or even threats of serious violence. Etc etc. This is the idea of grooming, to take rebellious and unconfident young girls and set them against their parents' already flagging control. To make them feel "grown up" and involved in a sort of street culture of fast car rides, drugs, sex and alcohol that is alluring and exciting at that age. These victims see these people as their "friends" and often don’t want to prosecute, and because they’ve been conditioned by liberalist society in general to be so easy-going about sex and drug taking, and being 'colour blind' etc despite their parents' warnings - many don't see a problem with getting involved with any of it at the start. Unless you plan on locking young people in their bedrooms or installing tracking devices and CCTV around the neighbourhood to keep track of daughters, I don’t know what else somebody would do with a 13/14 year old girl who disappears random evenings until very late. Like somebody trying to make out that a rape victim “had it coming" because they dress a certain way or act a certain way, it is unacceptable to think this way and is on the way to being the mindset of an appeaser. It is the kind of attitude that if women don’t cover up or otherwise don’t conform to strict conservative social norms they are prey for rape like 'leaving a piece of chicken out for a cat' (to paraphrase an Australian Imam). It’s good to know that the team is cracking down on it, but it’s taken long enough - we've all known in these areas that it’s been going on for a decade or more. I think only a potent brew of pressure from the outside has seen this be taken up seriously. When it was brought up a good few years ago in Bradford, for the sake of "community cohesion" the problem was outright denied by the Chief Constable there and a television broadcast discussing the matter was postponed because it could have had explosive reactions at the ballot box in the then up-coming election. Some out there are still taking the line that this whole problem was a "racist myth" made up out of fresh air. But many normal people are far from in denial and have no qualms at pointing out just who is predominantly behind this. People can only obscure the truth for so long. It is a secret scourge on society, because nobody knows when and where, and what scale this problem is. I think there would be hell to pay if it was more open and visible in society. Tides are turning in that regard. It is good that these teams are there, because I know for a fact that if this had continued without such teams there are many people out there who are quite ready and willing to get together and try and get on top of this situation without the police being involved. Good luck to the team, we have to show this is not acceptable and we need to get proper court rulings that are fitting as a deterrent. But that’s where it usually falls down. Like many police schemes and such, they do a lot of expensive, emotional, time consuming work to see it come to a disheartening conviction at the end of it. Good luck to the team, its good to hear they are having some impact. Sadly though, this is a situation that isnt going to go away, and I bet its just the tip of the iceberg.
stevieg, says...
11:44am Wed 15 Jul 09
Slimplynth, Blackburn says...
12:49pm Wed 15 Jul 09
Enter your postcode, town or place name
Search jobs in and around Lancashire
Search Now »
Find the right person for you
Search Now »
Search houses, flats, and all properties
Search Now »
Search new & used cars in and around Lancashire
Search Now »
sambam, nelson says...
10:31am Tue 14 Jul 09
But if alaways baffles me when a story like this comes out the mere mention of asians gets people attacking the whole asian/muslim community. We have had stories most notably of peodophiles in our area...who happen to be white. Does this mean that all us white people condone such behaviour and at fault for these people doing this.
You get 5cums, benifit scroungers, junkies and drug dealers from all backgrounds.
Yes we do have a issue with older asian me targeting vulnerble white girls and the Engage team are doing a fatastic job in attempting to eradicate this. They are similar problems in Birmingham with members of the black community and in Notthingham with members of the white community.
Yes i do agree with you retiredone. i do feel that Salim Mulla needs to be more pro-active in his response to the issue. He is very defensive in his approach when something's gone wrong i feel that he needs to be just as critical of issues as this.