Clitheroe community bonfire is cancelled

Fireworks at the Clitheroe bonfire Fireworks at the Clitheroe bonfire

A COMMUNITY bonfire, which has raised £100,000 for charities, has been cancelled.

Plans to stage Clitheroe Community Bonfire on November 3 have fallen apart following organisers’ claims that ‘unreasonable restrictions’ have been placed on them by the local authorities, including the emergency services.

But member organisations from the Ribble Valley Event Safety Advisory Group, including the fire service and Ribble Valley Council, say there are very real safety concerns and a need to control crowds.

Lancashire Fire and Rescue said they had concerns that visitors could find themselves penned in by walls in one section without control of numbers.

However, Ribble Valley Council said it was happy to continue working on a ‘safe and enjoyable’ plan for the event.

Clitheroe Bonfire Committee claimed the free annual bonfire and firework display in the grounds of Clitheroe Castle had been cancelled due to an ‘over zealous’ attitude. The event was one of the few surviving community-organised bonfires in East Lancashire.

The committee includes members of the Rotary Clubs of Clitheroe, Ribblesdale and Pendle View, Clitheroe Round Table and Clitheroe Lions Club.

Bill Barker from the group said: “The bonfire has run in its present form for the last 15 years, and has entertained tens of thousands of Ribble Valley families in a safe and friendly environment, raising more than £100,000 for charities in the area.

“Sadly, the Ribble Valley Event Safety Advisory Group became involved and, at the eleventh hour, made totally unreasonable demands upon us.”

The Event Safety Advisory Group comprises Ribble Valley Council, Lancashire Constabulary, Lancashire Highways Authority, Lancashire Fire and Rescue Service and Lancashire Ambulance Service A spokesman for the fire service said: “From our perspective, we are expecting large numbers. The field near the castle is surrounded by walls and people could find themselves trapped. We were happy for the event to progress if safety concerns were addressed.”

Ribble Valley Council chief Marshal Scott said: “Last year’s bonfire was a huge success, but was attended by many more people than had been envisaged.

“Last week, I attended a meeting and pledged council support for the event, assistance with temporary road closures and traffic management, and financial support.

“It is therefore regrettable that the organisers feel unable to go ahead with the event, but even at this late stage, if they choose to proceed, the council is willing to help them plan for a safe and enjoyable bonfire.”

Comments (18)

12:16pm Fri 28 Sep 12

HarryBosch says...

Sounds like someone's spitting their dummy out here! It's one thing to come up against some jumped up 'elf & safety jobsworth, but when you've got such organizations as the fire and ambulance services raising concerns then it's time to listen. This event is a victim of its own success with many more spectators turning up last year than was originally envisaged. If spectator numbers increase again this year then the risks are very real. Please have a 're-think and take the council up on their offer of practical and financial help. This is a very popular event, don't let down the children and parent's of the Ribble Valley through some momentary surge of anger and frustration. Do the right thing!!
Sounds like someone's spitting their dummy out here! It's one thing to come up against some jumped up 'elf & safety jobsworth, but when you've got such organizations as the fire and ambulance services raising concerns then it's time to listen. This event is a victim of its own success with many more spectators turning up last year than was originally envisaged. If spectator numbers increase again this year then the risks are very real. Please have a 're-think and take the council up on their offer of practical and financial help. This is a very popular event, don't let down the children and parent's of the Ribble Valley through some momentary surge of anger and frustration. Do the right thing!! HarryBosch

12:54pm Fri 28 Sep 12

AnthonyUK says...

The h&s requirements are too excessive. I wouldn't go ahead with unreasonable demands like that either.
The h&s requirements are too excessive. I wouldn't go ahead with unreasonable demands like that either. AnthonyUK

1:09pm Fri 28 Sep 12

HarryBosch says...

AnthonyUK wrote:
The h&s requirements are too excessive. I wouldn't go ahead with unreasonable demands like that either.
That's just the thing AnthonyUK, there are no reports of what H&S requirements are being made. Therefore one can't possibly say wether those demands are reasonable or not. Maybe a little more in depth reporting by LT would enlighten us further.
[quote][p][bold]AnthonyUK[/bold] wrote: The h&s requirements are too excessive. I wouldn't go ahead with unreasonable demands like that either.[/p][/quote]That's just the thing AnthonyUK, there are no reports of what H&S requirements are being made. Therefore one can't possibly say wether those demands are reasonable or not. Maybe a little more in depth reporting by LT would enlighten us further. HarryBosch

1:10pm Fri 28 Sep 12

happycyclist says...

Darwen lost its bommie years ago and it has been lamented ever since. These are real, traditional community events that are being lost because of barmpot rules and regulations.
Darwen lost its bommie years ago and it has been lamented ever since. These are real, traditional community events that are being lost because of barmpot rules and regulations. happycyclist

3:52pm Fri 28 Sep 12

shytalk says...

They wrecked the torchlight procession with unreasonable demands and now the bonfire...How come is it there has never been a problem, yet Ribble valley council manage to invent them? The are doing nothing for Clitheroe except wreck the town by giving planning permission to any developer going and put barmpot rules and regulations in place to stop any community event they can.
Just don't vote for the bar stewards is all i can say.
They wrecked the torchlight procession with unreasonable demands and now the bonfire...How come is it there has never been a problem, yet Ribble valley council manage to invent them? The are doing nothing for Clitheroe except wreck the town by giving planning permission to any developer going and put barmpot rules and regulations in place to stop any community event they can. Just don't vote for the bar stewards is all i can say. shytalk

5:18pm Fri 28 Sep 12

brossen99 says...

The Safety Nazi's have taken over Clitheroe, banning the bonfire is a good match for their 20 Mph Zones, Clitheroe will die as a community if the current trend as led by the Limp-Dumps the idiots who lve there keep electing continues !
The Safety Nazi's have taken over Clitheroe, banning the bonfire is a good match for their 20 Mph Zones, Clitheroe will die as a community if the current trend as led by the Limp-Dumps the idiots who lve there keep electing continues ! brossen99

5:20pm Fri 28 Sep 12

Good call says...

These people are brainwashed jobsworths who have nothing better to do than going around and destroying traditional community events based on "health and safety"
These people are brainwashed jobsworths who have nothing better to do than going around and destroying traditional community events based on "health and safety" Good call

6:12pm Fri 28 Sep 12

BuckoTheMoose says...

I'm going out on a limb here but I bet there has never been a health and safety problem in the past. I bet these jobsworths are simply trying to justify thier own wages
I'm going out on a limb here but I bet there has never been a health and safety problem in the past. I bet these jobsworths are simply trying to justify thier own wages BuckoTheMoose

6:32pm Fri 28 Sep 12

Michael@ClitheroeSince58 says...

BuckoTheMoose wrote:
I'm going out on a limb here but I bet there has never been a health and safety problem in the past. I bet these jobsworths are simply trying to justify thier own wages
I think some people did get slightly hurt many years ago but I can't remember the full facts think the wind blew sparks into the crowd or something like that. The biggest problem for anyone organising anything these days is the people that are out to make a claim for anything they can.
[quote][p][bold]BuckoTheMoose[/bold] wrote: I'm going out on a limb here but I bet there has never been a health and safety problem in the past. I bet these jobsworths are simply trying to justify thier own wages[/p][/quote]I think some people did get slightly hurt many years ago but I can't remember the full facts think the wind blew sparks into the crowd or something like that. The biggest problem for anyone organising anything these days is the people that are out to make a claim for anything they can. Michael@ClitheroeSince58

6:40pm Fri 28 Sep 12

HarryBosch says...

I'm glad you've shown yourself M@C58 as I'm sure your local knowledge is greater than mine but was there not a death last year? Some guy from Formby from what I can recall. Or maybe it was unconnected. Shed any light sir??
I'm glad you've shown yourself M@C58 as I'm sure your local knowledge is greater than mine but was there not a death last year? Some guy from Formby from what I can recall. Or maybe it was unconnected. Shed any light sir?? HarryBosch

7:46pm Fri 28 Sep 12

Forever Blue says...

BuckoTheMoose wrote:
I'm going out on a limb here but I bet there has never been a health and safety problem in the past. I bet these jobsworths are simply trying to justify thier own wages
This night as been run without major incidents for 15years and if there has been a issue on the night at the review meeting that takes place after the event the volunteer organisers take on board for the next year so it won’t happen again.
The volunteers are a group of adult professionals with expert advice at hand they have been trying to communicate with the Ribble Valley ESAG group since March of this year with their plans without success.
A group can only take so much they have their own families, hobbies, and business to run as well.
[quote][p][bold]BuckoTheMoose[/bold] wrote: I'm going out on a limb here but I bet there has never been a health and safety problem in the past. I bet these jobsworths are simply trying to justify thier own wages[/p][/quote]This night as been run without major incidents for 15years and if there has been a issue on the night at the review meeting that takes place after the event the volunteer organisers take on board for the next year so it won’t happen again. The volunteers are a group of adult professionals with expert advice at hand they have been trying to communicate with the Ribble Valley ESAG group since March of this year with their plans without success. A group can only take so much they have their own families, hobbies, and business to run as well. Forever Blue

9:31pm Fri 28 Sep 12

JayEss says...

The H&S people can't win. They make demands and they are being unreasonable but if something was to happen then everyone asks why they were allowed to organise an unsafe event.
The H&S people can't win. They make demands and they are being unreasonable but if something was to happen then everyone asks why they were allowed to organise an unsafe event. JayEss

1:52am Sat 29 Sep 12

Pauliooo says...

Hello everyone who has commented on this page search Save Clitheroe Bonfire on Facebook and help us save it!!!!
Hello everyone who has commented on this page search Save Clitheroe Bonfire on Facebook and help us save it!!!! Pauliooo

2:25pm Sat 29 Sep 12

ClitheroeKid says...

I don’t think we are getting to full picture! What are the ‘unreasonable restrictions’ being placed on the committee? It would be good to know and then we can judge for ourselves if they are indeed ‘unreasonable’ All we have got is a concern from the Fire Service about people been potentially penned in if numbers where not effectively controlled. That concern to me seems quite valid – if something did go horribly wrong what would happen if people couldn’t be evacuated from the castle grounds safely if they were penned in???? Knowing some of the organisers, as I do, I can’t help feeling that they have thrown the toys out of the pram on this and are unwilling to work with the Ribble Valley Event Safety Advisory Group to resolve the situation. They are the professionals and like it or not Health and Safety isn’t something to be taken likely. Please can we have some clarification on what these ‘unreasonable restrictions/demands are? It’s all well and good Bill Barker saying this – but what are they? We could then begin to understand what the problem is. Instead we are just left dangling with one side blaming the other! Or maybe it’s an excuse for the organisers to get out of running things!
I don’t think we are getting to full picture! What are the ‘unreasonable restrictions’ being placed on the committee? It would be good to know and then we can judge for ourselves if they are indeed ‘unreasonable’ All we have got is a concern from the Fire Service about people been potentially penned in if numbers where not effectively controlled. That concern to me seems quite valid – if something did go horribly wrong what would happen if people couldn’t be evacuated from the castle grounds safely if they were penned in???? Knowing some of the organisers, as I do, I can’t help feeling that they have thrown the toys out of the pram on this and are unwilling to work with the Ribble Valley Event Safety Advisory Group to resolve the situation. They are the professionals and like it or not Health and Safety isn’t something to be taken likely. Please can we have some clarification on what these ‘unreasonable restrictions/demands are? It’s all well and good Bill Barker saying this – but what are they? We could then begin to understand what the problem is. Instead we are just left dangling with one side blaming the other! Or maybe it’s an excuse for the organisers to get out of running things! ClitheroeKid

2:27pm Sat 29 Sep 12

ClitheroeKid says...

HarryBosch wrote:
I'm glad you've shown yourself M@C58 as I'm sure your local knowledge is greater than mine but was there not a death last year? Some guy from Formby from what I can recall. Or maybe it was unconnected. Shed any light sir??
Harry, There has been no deaths at the Clitheroe Bonfire. You must be thinking of another event/bonfire else where.
[quote][p][bold]HarryBosch[/bold] wrote: I'm glad you've shown yourself M@C58 as I'm sure your local knowledge is greater than mine but was there not a death last year? Some guy from Formby from what I can recall. Or maybe it was unconnected. Shed any light sir??[/p][/quote]Harry, There has been no deaths at the Clitheroe Bonfire. You must be thinking of another event/bonfire else where. ClitheroeKid

12:45pm Sun 30 Sep 12

Forever Blue says...

ClitheroeKid wrote:
I don’t think we are getting to full picture! What are the ‘unreasonable restrictions’ being placed on the committee? It would be good to know and then we can judge for ourselves if they are indeed ‘unreasonable’ All we have got is a concern from the Fire Service about people been potentially penned in if numbers where not effectively controlled. That concern to me seems quite valid – if something did go horribly wrong what would happen if people couldn’t be evacuated from the castle grounds safely if they were penned in???? Knowing some of the organisers, as I do, I can’t help feeling that they have thrown the toys out of the pram on this and are unwilling to work with the Ribble Valley Event Safety Advisory Group to resolve the situation. They are the professionals and like it or not Health and Safety isn’t something to be taken likely. Please can we have some clarification on what these ‘unreasonable restrictions/demands are? It’s all well and good Bill Barker saying this – but what are they? We could then begin to understand what the problem is. Instead we are just left dangling with one side blaming the other! Or maybe it’s an excuse for the organisers to get out of running things!
Lancashire Fire and Rescue said they had concerns that visitors could find themselves penned in by walls in one section without control of numbers.
They have been miss informed by somebody the safety and control of movements of people around the castle field is paramount at all times for the organisers.
“They are the professionals and like it or not Health and Safety isn’t something to be taken likely”
Quite right Clitheroe Kid and the organisers don’t and never would compromise safety of the event.
Not quite right on part of your comment though Clitheroe Kid the Chairman of ESAG is actually a Building Inspector!!
[quote][p][bold]ClitheroeKid[/bold] wrote: I don’t think we are getting to full picture! What are the ‘unreasonable restrictions’ being placed on the committee? It would be good to know and then we can judge for ourselves if they are indeed ‘unreasonable’ All we have got is a concern from the Fire Service about people been potentially penned in if numbers where not effectively controlled. That concern to me seems quite valid – if something did go horribly wrong what would happen if people couldn’t be evacuated from the castle grounds safely if they were penned in???? Knowing some of the organisers, as I do, I can’t help feeling that they have thrown the toys out of the pram on this and are unwilling to work with the Ribble Valley Event Safety Advisory Group to resolve the situation. They are the professionals and like it or not Health and Safety isn’t something to be taken likely. Please can we have some clarification on what these ‘unreasonable restrictions/demands are? It’s all well and good Bill Barker saying this – but what are they? We could then begin to understand what the problem is. Instead we are just left dangling with one side blaming the other! Or maybe it’s an excuse for the organisers to get out of running things![/p][/quote]Lancashire Fire and Rescue said they had concerns that visitors could find themselves penned in by walls in one section without control of numbers. They have been miss informed by somebody the safety and control of movements of people around the castle field is paramount at all times for the organisers. “They are the professionals and like it or not Health and Safety isn’t something to be taken likely” Quite right Clitheroe Kid and the organisers don’t and never would compromise safety of the event. Not quite right on part of your comment though Clitheroe Kid the Chairman of ESAG is actually a Building Inspector!! Forever Blue

7:16am Mon 1 Oct 12

AnthonyUK says...

Forever Blue wrote:
ClitheroeKid wrote: I don’t think we are getting to full picture! What are the ‘unreasonable restrictions’ being placed on the committee? It would be good to know and then we can judge for ourselves if they are indeed ‘unreasonable’ All we have got is a concern from the Fire Service about people been potentially penned in if numbers where not effectively controlled. That concern to me seems quite valid – if something did go horribly wrong what would happen if people couldn’t be evacuated from the castle grounds safely if they were penned in???? Knowing some of the organisers, as I do, I can’t help feeling that they have thrown the toys out of the pram on this and are unwilling to work with the Ribble Valley Event Safety Advisory Group to resolve the situation. They are the professionals and like it or not Health and Safety isn’t something to be taken likely. Please can we have some clarification on what these ‘unreasonable restrictions/demands are? It’s all well and good Bill Barker saying this – but what are they? We could then begin to understand what the problem is. Instead we are just left dangling with one side blaming the other! Or maybe it’s an excuse for the organisers to get out of running things!
Lancashire Fire and Rescue said they had concerns that visitors could find themselves penned in by walls in one section without control of numbers. They have been miss informed by somebody the safety and control of movements of people around the castle field is paramount at all times for the organisers. “They are the professionals and like it or not Health and Safety isn’t something to be taken likely” Quite right Clitheroe Kid and the organisers don’t and never would compromise safety of the event. Not quite right on part of your comment though Clitheroe Kid the Chairman of ESAG is actually a Building Inspector!!
But if they haven't had problems before then why the sudden kneejerk request to implement additional safety measures? If the Clitheroe Bonfire Committee gives into this then what next? Are the ESAG gonna throw up more and more unnecessary bumf and concerns to the workload of the already busy responsibilities? No wonder more and more events are going to the wall when dogooders throw up additional redtape and restrictions to event organisers that cannot always easily be accommodated.
[quote][p][bold]Forever Blue[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]ClitheroeKid[/bold] wrote: I don’t think we are getting to full picture! What are the ‘unreasonable restrictions’ being placed on the committee? It would be good to know and then we can judge for ourselves if they are indeed ‘unreasonable’ All we have got is a concern from the Fire Service about people been potentially penned in if numbers where not effectively controlled. That concern to me seems quite valid – if something did go horribly wrong what would happen if people couldn’t be evacuated from the castle grounds safely if they were penned in???? Knowing some of the organisers, as I do, I can’t help feeling that they have thrown the toys out of the pram on this and are unwilling to work with the Ribble Valley Event Safety Advisory Group to resolve the situation. They are the professionals and like it or not Health and Safety isn’t something to be taken likely. Please can we have some clarification on what these ‘unreasonable restrictions/demands are? It’s all well and good Bill Barker saying this – but what are they? We could then begin to understand what the problem is. Instead we are just left dangling with one side blaming the other! Or maybe it’s an excuse for the organisers to get out of running things![/p][/quote]Lancashire Fire and Rescue said they had concerns that visitors could find themselves penned in by walls in one section without control of numbers. They have been miss informed by somebody the safety and control of movements of people around the castle field is paramount at all times for the organisers. “They are the professionals and like it or not Health and Safety isn’t something to be taken likely” Quite right Clitheroe Kid and the organisers don’t and never would compromise safety of the event. Not quite right on part of your comment though Clitheroe Kid the Chairman of ESAG is actually a Building Inspector!![/p][/quote]But if they haven't had problems before then why the sudden kneejerk request to implement additional safety measures? If the Clitheroe Bonfire Committee gives into this then what next? Are the ESAG gonna throw up more and more unnecessary bumf and concerns to the workload of the already busy responsibilities? No wonder more and more events are going to the wall when dogooders throw up additional redtape and restrictions to event organisers that cannot always easily be accommodated. AnthonyUK

7:53pm Mon 1 Oct 12

UKIP-Ron says...

all i can say is after 45 years living in clitheroe i have heard it all now,
my informants tell me its the work of one man. so maybe if we throw him into the ribble at high flood that might solve the problem.
the local papers should find out who it is and what its about .and let every one know about it.
my advice to the people who organise it is simple.
stick two fingers up at the sicko and carry on regardless.
the clitheroe grounds are puplic domain of clitheroe town people ( bought in the 1920 s as a war memorial for the dead of ww1 )
so its up to them not some idiot to say if the bonefire will go ahead.
carry on and good luck.
all i can say is after 45 years living in clitheroe i have heard it all now, my informants tell me its the work of one man. so maybe if we throw him into the ribble at high flood that might solve the problem. the local papers should find out who it is and what its about .and let every one know about it. my advice to the people who organise it is simple. stick two fingers up at the sicko and carry on regardless. the clitheroe grounds are puplic domain of clitheroe town people ( bought in the 1920 s as a war memorial for the dead of ww1 ) so its up to them not some idiot to say if the bonefire will go ahead. carry on and good luck. UKIP-Ron

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree