- Mobile site
- E-Newsletters
-
- News feed
- Find us on Twitter
@lancstelegraph
News, sport and entertainment from all over East Lancashire
@blackburnrovers
All the latest news from Blackburn Rovers
@burnleyfc
All the latest news from the Clarets
@lt_blackburn
Latest news from Blackburn
@lt_burnley
Latest news from Burnley
@lt_darwen
Latest news from Darwen
@lt_hyndburn
Latest news from Hyndburn
@lt_pendle
Latest news from Pendle
@lt_ribblevalley
Latest news from Ribble Valley
@lt_rossendale
Latest news from Rossendale
- Find us on Facebook
The Lancashire Telegraph
News, sport and entertainment from all over East Lancashire
Second bid to build Darwen homes (From Lancashire Telegraph)
When news happens, text LT and your photos and videos to 80360. Or contact us by email or phone.
Second bid to build Darwen homes
12:00pm Monday 24th September 2012 in News
CONTROVERSIAL plans for 133 new homes that were thrown out by the planning department last year are to be resubmitted this week.
The plans to develop land between Pole Lane and Spring Meadows were refused by Blackburn with Darwen’s planning committee in January last year.
Developers Ruttle Plant Holdings appealed to the Planning Inspectorate in October but the council’s decision was upheld.
But a year on the developers are back for another go.
Paul Sedgwick, of Sedgwick Associates, which is representing the developer, said the build would fit in with the council’s ‘core strategy’ for development.
He said: “The council’s core strategy requires 625 new homes a year. So far they are about 600 short of that. There will also be 20 per cent affordable homes.”
Mr Sedgwick said this sort of development was required under Government policy.
He said: “The Government said it needed house building to aid economic recovery. This should be seen as a positive contribution.”
In response to criticisms over building on a greenfield site instead of brownfield, Mr Sedgwick said there was no demand for brownfield builds.
He said: “The trouble with brownfield is it is not where people want to build as it isn’t where people are looking to buy houses.
“At the moment, the only people who can afford homes or mortgages are those moving up the property ladder. This is good as they free up houses for people lower down the ladder.”
Marsh House town councillor Simon Huggill said he was still opposed to the plans.
He said: “I can’t see anything has changed. It shows a disregard for residents and the Planning Inspectorate. I am a great believer in the sustaining of our countryside.”
Comments are closed on this article.
Comments (22)
2:03pm Mon 24 Sep 12
eastlancslad says...
Simon Huggill, you are dead right. Stick to your guns, and don't let the -------- grind you down!
Paul Sedgwick, don't you know that what a government minister says depends on the ploitical situation at the time he says it. It's not written in blood. Anyway government ministers in my experience rarely have any expertise in any field other than talking themselves up
Ruttle Homes, maximising your profit is what building on green field sites is all about. I don't have a problem with making a profit, but please do not think we are stupid. Most of us arn't.
Which bit of 'we dont want your homes here' do you not understand?
2:34pm Mon 24 Sep 12
Bat E Karen says...
If they built houses of a decent size, with reasonable gardens and a bit of landscaping on brownfield, I'm sure people would look to buy them.
The Council should keep hold of as much greenfield land as possible and tidy up the scruffy areas that have been left to fester.
3:08pm Mon 24 Sep 12
english rose 1 says...
'Safeguarded land' means the land has been earmarked for future housing development. (Town Councillor Huggill knows this full well).
*
The main reason it was refused last time is that development was premature in that other brownfield sites hadn't been developed yet.
*
The Tory/Lib-Dem Government has complicated things by insisting that all Councils bring forward more land for development.
*
This land will be developed for housing at some point in the future - it's the timing that's the issue.
8:18pm Mon 24 Sep 12
johndarwen says...
Blackburn will give in this time and alow the building work to comence. Time to find a plane and leave this sinking (stinking) town and leave it to the people that are making this place look like the back of beyond.
10:41pm Mon 24 Sep 12
salcat says...
3:41pm Tue 25 Sep 12
Darwenwolf says...
4:04pm Tue 25 Sep 12
Chrissy camel says...
It's only a matter of time before the planning is passed. Like English rose quoted "'Safeguarded land' means the land has been earmarked for future housing development. (Town Councillor Huggill knows this full well)." You only have to do your homework/research to know this!
Bring on the development!!!!
4:11pm Tue 25 Sep 12
Darwenwolf says...
4:16pm Tue 25 Sep 12
Darwenwolf says...
4:22pm Tue 25 Sep 12
Darwenwolf says...
5:01pm Tue 25 Sep 12
Chrissy camel says...
6:07pm Tue 25 Sep 12
Darwenwolf says...
6:24pm Tue 25 Sep 12
Chrissy camel says...
6:43pm Tue 25 Sep 12
Darwenwolf says...
6:43pm Tue 25 Sep 12
pyeman2010 says...
7:18pm Tue 25 Sep 12
Chrissy camel says...
The 6ft crater that every car tries to avoid opposite the cottages will be sorted too. So not only is it making the run down area look much better but stopping possible accidents happening every time someone swerves around the craters and saving people money in car repairs.
No doubt someone will comment saying these things can be fixed without the planning permission being passed but how long has the water flowed across pole lane? Years is the answer! How many times do these holes get filled in reappearing weeks later?
All small things but all things that effect people on a daily basis.
The doubters and moaner are just the people that don't want houses looking nicer and better kept than that of their own (Simon Huggill)!!
10:18pm Tue 25 Sep 12
Darwenwolf says...
10:26am Wed 26 Sep 12
Chrissy camel says...
11:14am Wed 26 Sep 12
Darwenwolf says...
12:51am Thu 27 Sep 12
english rose 1 says...
*
When he was a Borough Councillor Simon Huggill proposed that the Academy should be built on the Moorland site not this piece of land on Pole Ln.
12:09pm Thu 27 Sep 12
Darwenwolf says...
6:20pm Thu 27 Sep 12
Darwenwolf says...