East Lancashire's gymslip mums on rise

GYMSLIP The latest teenage pregnancy figures are a shock GYMSLIP The latest teenage pregnancy figures are a shock

TEENAGE pregnancies among under-16s in Burnley have soared by more than 40 per cent over the past 10 years.

And the number of pregnancies among under-18s has also increased, according to latest official statistics.

There were 98 births for under 18s, up from 91 the previous year.

In Rossendale the figure jumped from 55 to 63 in the same period.

And in 2001-3 there were 52 births involving under-16s, which had increased to 60 by 2008-10, figures by the Office for National Statistics show.

Bank Hall, one of Burnley’s most deprived wards, is in the top 10 for under-18 conceptions in the county.

The extra teen births come at a time when the rates in neighbouring Hyndburn and Pendle have dropped, and only a slight increase was recorded for Blackburn with Darwen.

Burnley MP Gordon Birtwistle blamed the failings of advice services for the shock figures. Several youth advice shops have been closed because of cutbacks.

“The county council needs to get a grip on this - they are receiving the funding and should be sorting this out,” he said.

Countywide research shows that nearly 90 per cent of teenage mothers in Burnley had no educational qualifications, with greater percentages recorded in the town’s central terraced estates.

Lancashire Care NHS Foundation Trust, which has assumed responsibility for sexual health services from NHS East Lancashire, has appointed three teenage health co-ordinators, one each for Burnley, Pendle and Rossendale.

A spokesman said that since 1998 there had been a ‘considerable reduction’ in under-18 conceptions, from 146 to 98 currently.

He added: “Although there have been slight fluctuations and increases in particular area, the downward trend is positive and a step in the right direction.

“We will continue to work with our partners to ensure that young people in East Lancashire are able to make informed choices about contraception and sexual health.”

Generally under-18 conception rates have been falling in Burnley, from a high of 146 in 1998 to below 100 in recent years.

Rossendale councillor Gladys Sandiford, a retired midwife, said that the valley’s rates were a ‘surprise’ given the standards of education offered by local high schools.

She added: “When you have mothers who are significantly younger or older then this more likely to give rise to problems in pregnancy and births.

“Babies can often be born premature, or underweight, and they do not get off to the best starts in life.

“It does concern me that there has been this blip, after so many years of progress, and I hope that through more education, through our excellent local schools, that we may able to get the message across to girls, for their own good and that of their babies.”

In a county council report, information officer Afzal Patel said: “The life chances of teenage parents and their children are worse than those of older parents and their children.

“Teenage mothers are likely to experience a poorer standard of living and poorer mental health.

“The children of teenage mothers are also likely to do less well in educational terms, are more likely to become economically inactive and more likely to become teenage mothers themselves.

“The infant mortality rate for babies of teenage mothers is 60 per cent higher than for older mothers. Around half of teenage conceptions end in abortion, suggesting that they are unplanned.”

Comments(14)

Black Car Guy. says...
11:43am Thu 23 Aug 12

Is it high because they dont need to work and soon as they are pregnant they can get free hand outs and free homes?

darwenTower says...
12:23pm Thu 23 Aug 12

I believe that the burden should remain with the families rather than become the problem of society at large.

If their own parents were going to have to fund the upbringing of these children I can guarantee that many of these pregnancies would not happen.

charles22 says...
2:23pm Thu 23 Aug 12

Having read this article and the editorial in today's newspaper, this is one of the weakest piece of writing I have ever read in the Telegraph. At no time does it state that sex with a girl under the age of 16 is a crime and is punishable by a prison sentence. What efforts are being made to track down those responsible?
What about the moral prespective in all of this - it is all very well for a member of parliament to continually complain that it is lack of spending is the cause of this, but money is not always the answer. Surely part of this problem goes back to having a moral code higher than that of an alley cat.

halfhearted says...
2:25pm Thu 23 Aug 12

People go to work and pay National Insurnace,not for these types but for a decent Health Service,Pension etc. But this Government and previous ones have robbed the pot to make life easy for those who bleed the system.
Many but all of these young people will live off the state for most if not the rest of their lives. They will reach pension age and receive more than one who has worked. This is not right.
The Government has yest again borrowed more to support the Welfare system.. It is time to call a halt,stop supporting those who choose to go down this path.

timeforcommonsense says...
2:55pm Thu 23 Aug 12

I think it has to be said that in these days of teaching children about sex education at primary school and over sexualisation of our music industry it is no surprise that kids are dabbling in sex and typically ending up pregnant. It's time we addressed such issues. The music industry needs to take a long hard look at itself, if you need to be graphically sexual to sell your music then obviously your supposed talent isn't enough. There is nothing creepier and more morally wrong than hearing a 5 year old singing explicit lyrics. As for teaching our children about sex education at an earlier age, who the hell thought that was a good idea? If you teach someone about something they are going to want to experiment with the things they are being taught. It's like teaching a five year old how to drive a car and then saying "but don't do it for another 13 years will you".

timeforcommonsense says...
2:55pm Thu 23 Aug 12

I think it has to be said that in these days of teaching children about sex education at primary school and over sexualisation of our music industry it is no surprise that kids are dabbling in sex and typically ending up pregnant. It's time we addressed such issues. The music industry needs to take a long hard look at itself, if you need to be graphically sexual to sell your music then obviously your supposed talent isn't enough. There is nothing creepier and more morally wrong than hearing a 5 year old singing explicit lyrics. As for teaching our children about sex education at an earlier age, who the hell thought that was a good idea? If you teach someone about something they are going to want to experiment with the things they are being taught. It's like teaching a five year old how to drive a car and then saying "but don't do it for another 13 years will you".

prince of darkness says...
3:27pm Thu 23 Aug 12

halfhearted wrote:
People go to work and pay National Insurnace,not for these types but for a decent Health Service,Pension etc. But this Government and previous ones have robbed the pot to make life easy for those who bleed the system.
Many but all of these young people will live off the state for most if not the rest of their lives. They will reach pension age and receive more than one who has worked. This is not right.
The Government has yest again borrowed more to support the Welfare system.. It is time to call a halt,stop supporting those who choose to go down this path.
Well said.
If the hand outs wernt so easy would reduce these numbers.Throwing money at this problems not the answer, more like the cause.They should be made responsible for their own actions not expect free help.But then morals all out of the window these days.

Excluded again says...
3:32pm Thu 23 Aug 12

Its always strange how the girls get all the blame, even if they are at least trying to bring up the baby?

It takes two to make a baby (if I remember my biology lessons correctly). The last recorded instances of a woman giving birth without having sex with a man was 2000 years ago - and some people don't even believe that case.

Why do the men get away with it? The baby is as much their responsibility as the woman's.

Izanears says...
4:25pm Thu 23 Aug 12

Black Car Guy. wrote:
Is it high because they dont need to work and soon as they are pregnant they can get free hand outs and free homes?
Just remind me again about how much the government has spent on Sex Education.

darwenTower says...
4:47pm Thu 23 Aug 12

Excluded again wrote:
Its always strange how the girls get all the blame, even if they are at least trying to bring up the baby?

It takes two to make a baby (if I remember my biology lessons correctly). The last recorded instances of a woman giving birth without having sex with a man was 2000 years ago - and some people don't even believe that case.

Why do the men get away with it? The baby is as much their responsibility as the woman's.
The 'men' get away with it because they don't give birth. Maybe they shouldn't but it's a moot point if they aren't working and have no means of helping to raise a child financially.

This governments of this country have, for decades, been using our tax money to fund the overpopulation of the country by the feckless.

How many decent hard working families do you know who have no kids, or a small number of children, by choice and due to financial limitations?

So what do we get? The feckless become the majority.

I'm not suggesting that all of these teenagers will make bad parents but even at the absolute best, the situation is less than ideal.

BacupBoy says...
8:27pm Thu 23 Aug 12

Teenage pregnancies are going up becuase morals are going down

accy lad and proud says...
8:40pm Thu 23 Aug 12

BacupBoy wrote:
Teenage pregnancies are going up becuase morals are going down
Morals or knickers !

ste.g says...
9:28pm Thu 23 Aug 12

halfhearted wrote:
People go to work and pay National Insurnace,not for these types but for a decent Health Service,Pension etc. But this Government and previous ones have robbed the pot to make life easy for those who bleed the system.
Many but all of these young people will live off the state for most if not the rest of their lives. They will reach pension age and receive more than one who has worked. This is not right.
The Government has yest again borrowed more to support the Welfare system.. It is time to call a halt,stop supporting those who choose to go down this path.
spot on

Sajdin says...
8:49pm Fri 24 Aug 12

nice to see my comment being deleted, anyone realise that 99% of these girls are white? can someone explain why that is?

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree