Killer Donald Neilson told doctors he didn't want to live (From Lancashire Telegraph)

His life should have ended in 1975. What a waste of money keeping him alive for the past 37 years.

happycyclist wrote:
His life should have ended in 1975. What a waste of money keeping him alive for the past 37 years.

Agreed, total waste of oxygen and other resources.

I hope he suffered a long and painful death. Good riddance.

I challenge anybody to justify keeping this individual alive all this time.

Even the do-gooders of this world would have struggled to argue against the death penalty on this occasion.

happycyclist wrote:
His life should have ended in 1975. What a waste of money keeping him alive for the past 37 years.

Why do we even need prisons?

All CRIMINALS should be recycled!

The meat could be used as food, and the bones and hair for glue and clothing.

We would blood a perfect "good" society for our children to live in.

Who was that chap who suggested similar ?, er Adolf summat.

makaveli96 wrote:

happycyclist wrote:
His life should have ended in 1975. What a waste of money keeping him alive for the past 37 years.

Why do we even need prisons?

All CRIMINALS should be recycled!

The meat could be used as food, and the bones and hair for glue and clothing.

We would blood a perfect "good" society for our children to live in.

Tell that to Derek Astin's family.

No one has the right to take a Life, not even one like this. It's pretty clear he hates the life he has and no longer wants it to continue it, so in my opinion justice is doing an excellent job.

Angry Bob wrote:
I challenge anybody to justify keeping this individual alive all this time.

Even the do-gooders of this world would have struggled to argue against the death penalty on this occasion.

He needs to be kept alive because otherwise, we pander to the wishes of vermin.

He wants a way out, so we give it to him? Grow up.

Brady wants a way out but he won't be given it. Fred West escaped justice by carking himself as did Harold Shipman. The best way to deal with vermin is to make them confront the enormity of their evil, not giving them an easy way out when they're caught.

And only the feeble-minded call for our country to ally with some of the worst, most evil regimes on the planet and kill people in the name of the state so please don't assume anyone going against your blood-**** is a 'do-gooder'.

Chris P Bacon wrote:

Angry Bob wrote:
I challenge anybody to justify keeping this individual alive all this time.

Even the do-gooders of this world would have struggled to argue against the death penalty on this occasion.

He needs to be kept alive because otherwise, we pander to the wishes of vermin.

He wants a way out, so we give it to him? Grow up.

Brady wants a way out but he won't be given it. Fred West escaped justice by carking himself as did Harold Shipman. The best way to deal with vermin is to make them confront the enormity of their evil, not giving them an easy way out when they're caught.

And only the feeble-minded call for our country to ally with some of the worst, most evil regimes on the planet and kill people in the name of the state so please don't assume anyone going against your blood-**** is a 'do-gooder'.

I agree. Why don't we punish him though. I don't mean prison I mean pain! This country's to soft and to politically correct. Torture of vermin would work and should be the way forward. Removal of bodily parts, water torture, lack of sleep, etc etc...

makaveli96 wrote:

Chris P Bacon wrote:

Angry Bob wrote:
I challenge anybody to justify keeping this individual alive all this time.

Even the do-gooders of this world would have struggled to argue against the death penalty on this occasion.

He needs to be kept alive because otherwise, we pander to the wishes of vermin.

He wants a way out, so we give it to him? Grow up.

Brady wants a way out but he won't be given it. Fred West escaped justice by carking himself as did Harold Shipman. The best way to deal with vermin is to make them confront the enormity of their evil, not giving them an easy way out when they're caught.

And only the feeble-minded call for our country to ally with some of the worst, most evil regimes on the planet and kill people in the name of the state so please don't assume anyone going against your blood-**** is a 'do-gooder'.

I agree. Why don't we punish him though. I don't mean prison I mean pain! This country's to soft and to politically correct. Torture of vermin would work and should be the way forward. Removal of bodily parts, water torture, lack of sleep, etc etc...

It's been considered but once the European Court of Human Rights legislation committee got wind of the inhuman suggestion of making them go to Ewok Park EVERY HOME GAME, it was booted out. All the other things on your list are up for ratification though, apparently!

Michael@ClitheroeSin
ce58 wrote:
No one has the right to take a Life, not even one like this. It's pretty clear he hates the life he has and no longer wants it to continue it, so in my opinion justice is doing an excellent job.

Just wanted to point out that he's actually dead chief, died last year. I'm sure it says somthing to that effect in the article.

Babbar Divino wrote:

Michael@ClitheroeSin

ce58 wrote:
No one has the right to take a Life, not even one like this. It's pretty clear he hates the life he has and no longer wants it to continue it, so in my opinion justice is doing an excellent job.

Just wanted to point out that he's actually dead chief, died last year. I'm sure it says somthing to that effect in the article.

Yeah he died last year.

Chris P Bacon wrote:

makaveli96 wrote:

Chris P Bacon wrote:

Angry Bob wrote:
I challenge anybody to justify keeping this individual alive all this time.

Even the do-gooders of this world would have struggled to argue against the death penalty on this occasion.

He needs to be kept alive because otherwise, we pander to the wishes of vermin.

He wants a way out, so we give it to him? Grow up.

Brady wants a way out but he won't be given it. Fred West escaped justice by carking himself as did Harold Shipman. The best way to deal with vermin is to make them confront the enormity of their evil, not giving them an easy way out when they're caught.

And only the feeble-minded call for our country to ally with some of the worst, most evil regimes on the planet and kill people in the name of the state so please don't assume anyone going against your blood-**** is a 'do-gooder'.

I agree. Why don't we punish him though. I don't mean prison I mean pain! This country's to soft and to politically correct. Torture of vermin would work and should be the way forward. Removal of bodily parts, water torture, lack of sleep, etc etc...

It's been considered but once the European Court of Human Rights legislation committee got wind of the inhuman suggestion of making them go to Ewok Park EVERY HOME GAME, it was booted out. All the other things on your list are up for ratification though, apparently!

Some suggested shaving their legs, but that was deemed to be denying them their masculinity. It was decided this is only done by weirdos who want to go faster and grow sideburns.

Michael@ClitheroeSin
ce58 wrote:

Babbar Divino wrote:

Michael@ClitheroeSin


ce58 wrote:
No one has the right to take a Life, not even one like this. It's pretty clear he hates the life he has and no longer wants it to continue it, so in my opinion justice is doing an excellent job.

Just wanted to point out that he's actually dead chief, died last year. I'm sure it says somthing to that effect in the article.

Yeah he died last year.

Then he should be dug up, set on fire, dragged behind a toyota landcruiser and hit with shoes, then set on fire again, then dragged behind the pickup again.
Theres nothing like a good send off.

RUinsane wrote:

Michael@ClitheroeSin

ce58 wrote:

Babbar Divino wrote:

Michael@ClitheroeSin



ce58 wrote:
No one has the right to take a Life, not even one like this. It's pretty clear he hates the life he has and no longer wants it to continue it, so in my opinion justice is doing an excellent job.

Just wanted to point out that he's actually dead chief, died last year. I'm sure it says somthing to that effect in the article.

Yeah he died last year.

Then he should be dug up, set on fire, dragged behind a toyota landcruiser and hit with shoes, then set on fire again, then dragged behind the pickup again.
Theres nothing like a good send off.

Quality!

Chris P Bacon wrote:

Angry Bob wrote:
I challenge anybody to justify keeping this individual alive all this time.

Even the do-gooders of this world would have struggled to argue against the death penalty on this occasion.

He needs to be kept alive because otherwise, we pander to the wishes of vermin.

He wants a way out, so we give it to him? Grow up.

Brady wants a way out but he won't be given it. Fred West escaped justice by carking himself as did Harold Shipman. The best way to deal with vermin is to make them confront the enormity of their evil, not giving them an easy way out when they're caught.

And only the feeble-minded call for our country to ally with some of the worst, most evil regimes on the planet and kill people in the name of the state so please don't assume anyone going against your blood-**** is a 'do-gooder'.

It's a matter of opinion Chris, personally I don't see why the taxpayer should have to fork out £50 K plus per prisoner per year to sustain these individuals who have committed atrocious crimes and will never put anything back into society.

And I'm not in any way suggesting that we take a leaf out of Syria's book when it comes to this topic. There's absolutely nothing feeble minded about wanting to see people like Ian Huntley and Roy Whiting permanently removed from the world, they may be limited in what they can do for the rest of their lives and have to reflect on their bidding but they still ultimately enjoy the gift that they have callously taken away from others.

I'm not assuming that everybody who opposes capital punishment is a do gooder but there are too many people out there who simply give credit to the human rights of people like Huntley for example without weighing it up against the horrific crimes they have committed.

Angry Bob wrote:

Chris P Bacon wrote:

Angry Bob wrote:
I challenge anybody to justify keeping this individual alive all this time.

Even the do-gooders of this world would have struggled to argue against the death penalty on this occasion.

He needs to be kept alive because otherwise, we pander to the wishes of vermin.

He wants a way out, so we give it to him? Grow up.

Brady wants a way out but he won't be given it. Fred West escaped justice by carking himself as did Harold Shipman. The best way to deal with vermin is to make them confront the enormity of their evil, not giving them an easy way out when they're caught.

And only the feeble-minded call for our country to ally with some of the worst, most evil regimes on the planet and kill people in the name of the state so please don't assume anyone going against your blood-**** is a 'do-gooder'.

It's a matter of opinion Chris, personally I don't see why the taxpayer should have to fork out £50 K plus per prisoner per year to sustain these individuals who have committed atrocious crimes and will never put anything back into society.

And I'm not in any way suggesting that we take a leaf out of Syria's book when it comes to this topic. There's absolutely nothing feeble minded about wanting to see people like Ian Huntley and Roy Whiting permanently removed from the world, they may be limited in what they can do for the rest of their lives and have to reflect on their bidding but they still ultimately enjoy the gift that they have callously taken away from others.

I'm not assuming that everybody who opposes capital punishment is a do gooder but there are too many people out there who simply give credit to the human rights of people like Huntley for example without weighing it up against the horrific crimes they have committed.

But you can't have capital punishment. There's no point arguing for it, it won't happen in your great-great grandchildren's lifetimes. I found this http://en.wikipedia.
org/wiki/Howard_Hugh
es_(murderer) looking it up and when you get vile organisations like the BNP (see down page) wanting to bring it back, even they are being told it's a vote loser.

The fact is, we can all be grateful society hasn't sunk to the levels of these vermin and glorify killing. It was the chief hangman, Albert Pierpoint who was instrumental in getting it abolished. It was also illuminating to see schoolyards and workplaces divided when people were being hanged; some celebrated it while others were repulsed. Obviously, I've no experience of that, just what I've been told by older colleagues and workmates.

The £50K plus it costs keeping people like him alive could be spent giving others (children) a better start in life so that they don't end up in a life of crime.

Strange how many are content to see their hard-earned taxpayers' money spent on keeping scum like that alive for decades but begrudge their taxes supporting law-abiding people who are in the unfortunate position of just not having a job.