Bishop of Blackburn's concerns over asylum seeker plan (From Lancashire Telegraph)
When news happens, text LT and your photos and videos to 80360. Or contact us by email or phone.
Bishop of Blackburn's concerns over asylum seeker plan
3:00pm Monday 2nd July 2012 in News
By Bill Jacobs, Local government reporter
THE Bishop of Blackburn has backed Jack Straw and the borough council’s concerns over the possible doubling of asylum seekers coming to the town under a new management system.
The Rt Rev Nicholas Reade spoke out as representatives from Serco, the private company taking over the ‘dispersal’ contract from the local authority, and the UK Borders Agency prepare to visit the town.
They will meet officials from Blackburn with Darwen Council tomorrow before going on to be questioned by asylum seekers settled here under a previous arrangement between the Home Office and the local authority.
MP Mr Straw, who in government struck the original deal in 2000 capping the numbers at 700, has urged Home Secretary Theresa May to reduce that limit to the 350 currently in the borough which council leader Kate Hollern and officials think is enough.
He has also asked her to ensure that the authority has final control of where new asylum seekers are placed, because of issues of social cohesion in the town.
Bishop Reade said: “Asylum seekers are amongst the most vulnerable people in our society.
“While their claim to asylum is being investigated, it is important they are given a welcome and the necessary support.
“This needs to be done in a well-managed way that does not overwhelm the resources of any particular community.
“I am proud of the way in which both the council and the people of Blackburn with Darwen have welcomed asylum seekers living amongst us in recent years. I share some of the concerns expressed by Mr Straw and by councillors, that a sudden doubling in numbers being sent to live here could stretch resources beyond capacity.
“This would not only be to the detriment of permanent residents but also to asylum seekers themselves.”
Vin Purcell, who works for Blackburn Cathedral with the Children’s Society and the local Methodist church supporting the asylum seekers as they settle in the town, has organised tomorrow’s meeting.
He said: “Serco can expect some very searching questions from the asylum seekers about the new arrange- ments.
“There is great concern among them and those of us who work with them that they might make things worse rather than better.”
Comments(22)
stormy
says...
3:32pm Mon 2 Jul 12
berniep
says...
3:40pm Mon 2 Jul 12
juanbbien
says...
3:40pm Mon 2 Jul 12
SilverFox424 wrote:Or incorporate some soup kitchens in the new multimillion pound cloister developments that him and his staff could supervise.
The bishop could let a few asylum seekers stay with him in his palatial home, that would be very Christian and leading by example
madari
says...
3:48pm Mon 2 Jul 12
Social engineering at its best!!
Keep up the good work,let em all in, we really need them!!
Graham Hartley
says...
3:58pm Mon 2 Jul 12
juanbbien wrote:Fine ideas, both; but they are not part of God's plan as divined by His representatives in Blackburn else they would already be effected.
SilverFox424 wrote:Or incorporate some soup kitchens in the new multimillion pound cloister developments that him and his staff could supervise.
The bishop could let a few asylum seekers stay with him in his palatial home, that would be very Christian and leading by example
Do we expect that the Bishop 'spoke out' to great effect? And if other local faith leaders 'speak out' will the effect be cumulative, or will the influence of faith groups reduce because they cannot agree which God(s) is/are running this merry show?
phillip14
says...
4:43pm Mon 2 Jul 12
burner
says...
4:47pm Mon 2 Jul 12
i know alot
says...
5:04pm Mon 2 Jul 12
Hippocroccapig
says...
5:13pm Mon 2 Jul 12
This cap has never been reached and current levels are at just half that - 350. What Straw is now saying is that 700 is too much and should be reduced? If that is the case why did he agree to the 700 cap in ther first place when he was in government?
Info-warrior
says...
5:23pm Mon 2 Jul 12
INFOWARS.COM INFOWARS.COM
BritainfortheBritish
says...
5:27pm Mon 2 Jul 12
dougsie
says...
5:37pm Mon 2 Jul 12
doleboytrotter
says...
8:21pm Mon 2 Jul 12
UKIP-Ron
says...
8:32pm Mon 2 Jul 12
sounds like propergander from straw with an eye on the general election in next few years.. trouble is most in blackburn will believe him.
Black-burn is now living up to its name.
Black Car Guy.
says...
9:30pm Mon 2 Jul 12
berniep wrote:Other countries do not want them. England wants more people to bleed them dry and make the crime rate go up.
When is it going to be questioned as to why the asylum seekers seek refuge here when they have crossed on average of 17 other countries that are regarded as safe havens to get here.could it be the climate or the British tradition or maybe they love the royal family? I don't think so, it could be because Britain is a soft touch with plenty of benefits from the minuet they touch our soil.
i know alot
says...
9:59pm Mon 2 Jul 12
doleboytrotter wrote:told you what your like from Blackburn.Ya come over here and show no respect what so ever...AR*EHOLES
Check this one out - I like foreign people and I like them here, and I particularly like it when they get in your nasty xenophobic little Englander faces..
Malthus
says...
10:14pm Mon 2 Jul 12
nu-b.a.c.
says...
7:38am Tue 3 Jul 12
National politicians are 'in fighting' - labour made the decisions re: numbers in the
first place and now are taking a 'pop' at the conservatives for putting changes in place. Local councilors too - who support part of the present government - are getting in on the act by saying in the news that SERCO need sorting out but what do they say to SERCO when they meet or speak privately with them?
nu-b.a.c.
says...
9:11am Tue 3 Jul 12
Black Car Guy. wrote:More often than not these people do not have a choice as to where they end up. They simply want to get away from persecution - the agents who arrange the removal from their countries are the ones who decide where they go. Some have requested and expected to get to other countries and are amazed when they end up in the UK.
berniep wrote:Other countries do not want them. England wants more people to bleed them dry and make the crime rate go up.
When is it going to be questioned as to why the asylum seekers seek refuge here when they have crossed on average of 17 other countries that are regarded as safe havens to get here.could it be the climate or the British tradition or maybe they love the royal family? I don't think so, it could be because Britain is a soft touch with plenty of benefits from the minuet they touch our soil.
northwesterly
says...
8:55pm Tue 3 Jul 12
kozzy09
says...
11:04pm Tue 3 Jul 12
uton/London/Birmingh
am = The future face of England.
What is happening to this country is marxist social engineering and the cultural and racial genocide of the white british race. Nothing less.
SilverFox424 says...
3:27pm Mon 2 Jul 12