Report this comment
  • "The Council have been an absolute disgrace in the way they have vandalised Darwen Cemetery. It breaks my heart to see all the headstones that their thugs have managed to push over. Now they are ratting on the "In perpetuity" agreements and are obviously eager to let Friends of Darwen Cemetery take on more responsibility. This really highlights the lack of concern Blackburn has for Darwen."
  • This field is mandatory
  • This field is mandatory
  • Please note we will not accept reports with HTML tags or URLs in them.


  • Enter the above word in the box below

Darwen cemetery scheme is welcomed

Darwen cemetery scheme is welcomed

First published in News Lancashire Telegraph: Photograph of the Author by , Reporter

THE council has welcomed the launch of a new grave maintenance service by a Darwen friends group.

Under the new scheme, the Friends of Darwen Cemetery would carry out work to graves four times a year for a fee of £20.

Before the service can be signed up to, volunteers from the group will do a one-off clearance of the grave site, undertaking heavy work to ensure the grave is left in an easy to maintain state.

This will involve removing the top 5cm of soil and covering the grave space in weed control membrane and a layer of white stone chippings.

Blackburn with Darwen Council’s executive member for environment Coun Faryad Hussain said: “I think this is a very good idea from the Friends of Darwen Cemetery.

“It is innovative, will be a good affordable service for relatives and will help the group get income to continue its great work.

“We are fully supportive of it. By everyone working together we can make the borough a better place. The council no longer offers a perpetuity service and there is only a very few graves still maintained under this scheme.”

Local Businesses

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree