Blackburn RSS Feed


£23m affordable housing scheme unveiled in Blackburn

REBUILDING COMMUNITY Christine Connell at her home in Mosley Walk, Blackburn REBUILDING COMMUNITY Christine Connell at her home in Mosley Walk, Blackburn

A NEW £23million affordable housing development in Blackburn has been unveiled.

Lock 54, in the Infirmary Waterside area of Blackburn, is a partnership between housing association Places for People and Blackburn with Darwen Council.

The development, in the area around the former Warwick and Bailey factory, is one of the final projects completed under housing market renewal (HMR), the multi-million pound scheme axed by the coalition government last year.

Lock 54 has been built in four phases with the first three, comprising 131 one- to four-bedroom homes, now ready and fully occupied.

Another 28 properties are being built as part of phase four and should be completed by the autumn.

Among the 131 homes in phases one to three, 63 were available to own, including 18 that allowed initial rental followed by purchase, five bought with 30 per cent loans and 40 under a shared ownership arrangement.

Of the remaining 68, 41 were rented socially through Places for People and 27 were made available at market rental rates.

The scheme is another example of how East Lancashire’s councils and private developers have tried to provide better low-cost housing in recent years.

In Burnley, Keepmoat is building about 100 homes in Burnley Wood and off Cog Lane in a partnership with council chiefs.

The Doncaster-based housebuilder is also behind an HMR scheme of 60 properties off Blackburn Road, Accrington, which is backed by Hyndburn Council.

Meanwhile, the Duchy of Lancaster, the Queen’s property portfolio group, is building 12 affordable terraced houses in Dunsop Bridge, one of East Lancashire’s most expensive villages.

Blackburn with Darwen Council housing boss Tony Humphrys said: “The Lock 54 development has transformed the Infirmary area, making it a much sought-after place to live.

“The development brings much-needed high-quality family housing for local people who want to remain in the Infirmary area as well as for new residents moving in.”

Pat Egan, Places for People’s managing director for homes, added: “With our partners the Infirmary Waterside area has been transformed into a place where people now want to live.

“It has attracted many new people into the area, helping to revitalise it and has brought back some who used to live here years ago - a clear sign that the areas fortunes are changing for the better.”

The development also included a new ‘green trail’ nearby on the Leeds and Liverpool Canal, and the refurbishment of the Ivy Street community centre.

Christine Connell, who works at the community centre and lives at Lock 54, said: “I’ve lived in the Infirmary area for 37 years and moved into my new home at Lock 54 after the completion of phase one.

“The area has been transformed and it’s great that people now want to live here after a difficult few years and rebuild our community.”

Places for People designed the scheme to appeal to a wide variety of people, including those on low incomes and pensioners.

The 28 homes in phase four will also be available under a range of ownership and rental options.

Lock 54 was funded jointly, with £11.2million from HMR and £11.6million put up by Places for People.

Comments(11)

Graham Hartley says...
12:56am Wed 22 Jun 11

I can't afford twenty-three million pounds.

happycyclist says...
11:41am Wed 22 Jun 11

Why are BwDBC involved? They built up big debts with their housing department years ago and offloaded the stock to TVH.

thermio says...
12:36pm Wed 22 Jun 11

Can't seem to find where they politicise this....oh yes, there it is. Paragraph 3.

Just a bit of info for you, Chris Hopper - easily found on the internet:

"The Joseph Rowntree Foundation, a poverty charity, reported at an early stage that (while remaining generally supportive of the scheme), it was necessary for its success that financial, legal and moral commitments made up to a decade in advance should be supported by UK Central Government long-term funding commitments to 2019. . As of June 2008, however, Central Government funding had been committed only to March 2011, and Parliamentary concerns were expressed "that demolition sites, rather than newly built houses, will be the Programme’s legacy"

mickdork says...
12:47pm Wed 22 Jun 11

thermio wrote:
Can't seem to find where they politicise this....oh yes, there it is. Paragraph 3. Just a bit of info for you, Chris Hopper - easily found on the internet: "The Joseph Rowntree Foundation, a poverty charity, reported at an early stage that (while remaining generally supportive of the scheme), it was necessary for its success that financial, legal and moral commitments made up to a decade in advance should be supported by UK Central Government long-term funding commitments to 2019. . As of June 2008, however, Central Government funding had been committed only to March 2011, and Parliamentary concerns were expressed "that demolition sites, rather than newly built houses, will be the Programme’s legacy"
eh ?

thermio says...
1:17pm Wed 22 Jun 11

mickdork wrote:
thermio wrote:
Can't seem to find where they politicise this....oh yes, there it is. Paragraph 3. Just a bit of info for you, Chris Hopper - easily found on the internet: "The Joseph Rowntree Foundation, a poverty charity, reported at an early stage that (while remaining generally supportive of the scheme), it was necessary for its success that financial, legal and moral commitments made up to a decade in advance should be supported by UK Central Government long-term funding commitments to 2019. . As of June 2008, however, Central Government funding had been committed only to March 2011, and Parliamentary concerns were expressed "that demolition sites, rather than newly built houses, will be the Programme’s legacy"
eh ?
Just for you, Mickdork.
"The housing market renewal (HMR), the multi-million pound scheme axed by the coalition government last year"
As quoted in para.3 was only funded till March 2011 anyway. For it to be a success, it was estimated that funding be required till 2019. Therefore blaming the current government for its' end was making a political statement. Geddit?

A Darener says...
1:32pm Wed 22 Jun 11

Why do they keep building new houses when there are hundreds of empty properties and unsold houses on the market?

disgusted tunbridge wells says...
1:40pm Wed 22 Jun 11

Good point and it's the same at Burnley

happycyclist says...
4:57pm Wed 22 Jun 11

A Darener wrote:
Why do they keep building new houses when there are hundreds of empty properties and unsold houses on the market?
They're being turned into art projects now...

saker says...
11:37pm Wed 22 Jun 11

I dont understand this story at all, in what terms has the development been a success it does not say. The rented units would have been taken up without any issue because they are offered at below market rent, housing corporation's target rent, now called home communities,they would have received gap funding. The acid test is the shared ownership units which the private developer/constructi
on company would have taken a risk on, now has these been sold or have they too be moved to rented units.The whole concept i understood it was to create mixed communities has they happened or it might be the case great places has
moved all the units to rented stock, we need to know.

Graham Hartley says...
12:01am Thu 23 Jun 11

saker wrote:
I dont understand this story at all, in what terms has the development been a success it does not say. The rented units would have been taken up without any issue because they are offered at below market rent, housing corporation's target rent, now called home communities,they would have received gap funding. The acid test is the shared ownership units which the private developer/constructi

on company would have taken a risk on, now has these been sold or have they too be moved to rented units.The whole concept i understood it was to create mixed communities has they happened or it might be the case great places has
moved all the units to rented stock, we need to know.
Thanks, saker, for your comment - saving my time in constructing similar.

Twicki1 says...
3:45pm Thu 23 Jun 11

afordable housing is fine but I watched these being built and was horrified at how shoddy they are, wooden shacks that are made to look like proper brick houses. Maybe now the scheme has been scrapped house sales might improve.

click2find

Most popular


About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree